Ordinary Meeting of Council

TO BE HELD ON Tuesday, 5 February 2013 AT 7.00pm

Level 3 Council Chambers

 

Agenda

** ** ** ** ** **

 

 

NOTE:  For Full Details, See Council’s Website –

www.kmc.nsw.gov.au under the link to business papers

 

 

 

 

APOLOGIEs

 

 

 

DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

 

 

 

Confirmation of Reports to be Considered in Closed Meeting

 

 

 

Address the Council

NOTE:           Persons who address the Council should be aware that their address will be tape recorded.

 

 

 

Documents Circulated to Councillors

 

 

 

CONFIRMATION OF MINUTEs

 

Minutes of Ordinary Meeting of Council                                                                         8

File: S02131

Meeting held 11 December 2012

Minutes numbered 368 to 390

 

 

minutes from the Mayor

 

MM.1       Council to host Emergency Services Forums during 2013                                    73

 

File: S09408

 

Ku-ring-gai is surrounded by bushland which is one of its greatest assets.  However, with hundreds of houses along the bushland interface, the LGA is mainly at risk from bushfire and storm hazards and these risks need to be managed.

 

Notable events in the past involving wind storms and bushfires include:

 

·      On the afternoon of 21 January 1991, a devastating wind storm swept across the northern suburbs of Sydney. Mature blue gums trees were uprooted and foliage stripped.

·      In January 1994, Ku-ring-gai was severely affected by several of the fires which ringed Sydney and several homes were destroyed and areas of bushland burnt.

·      In December 2001, a wind storm swept across the northern suburbs of Sydney, affecting trees and impacting power lines, access and transport.

·      In January 2002, bushfires swept through the Lane Cove River State recreation area, skirting South Turramurra and Pymble. 

 

The extent of these hazards are usually characterised by the scope of their impact being community-wide, with medium to long-term effects.  Because they do not occur very often there is frequently a lack of social preparedness, and in some cases complacency may have set in.

 

Following discussions with members of the RFS and SES I would like to propose that Council host a series of local meetings in conjunction with the Emergency Services where discussions can be held on a range of emergency issues.  These include preparedness for storms and bushfires, as well as preparation of evacuation plans, agency contacts in emergencies, information alerts and kits.

 

There should be at least one meeting in the north and one in the south of the Council area, with more if needed.

 

 

MM.2       Financial Assistance Program - Economic and Social Development Initiatives 74

 

File: FY00430/4

 

For over 10 years Council has provided approximately $90,000 per year to community and cultural groups through the Financial Assistance Program. Last year this amount was significantly increased to $168,000 through a partnership that was developed between Council and the Turramurra Community Bank.

 

The current funding categories the Financial Assistance Program are Community Development Grants, Arts and Cultural Grants, and Small Equipment Grants.

 

Participant feedback from the recent Economic and Social Development Committee meeting, held in December 2012, proposed Council provide seed funding to assist the business sector in the engagement of the community in economic and social development initiatives, for example, small festivals and special events at our village centres and shopping malls.

 

It is therefore proposed that Council include an additional category in the Financial Assistance Program titled Economic and Social Development Grants, that will enable community or business groups to apply for funding to develop small events or festivals, or other projects that will encourage community engagement in economic and social development initiatives throughout Ku-ring-gai.

 

This proposal has been discussed with our partners in the Financial Assistance Program, the Turramurra Community Bank, who are supportive of it.

  

 

Petitions

 

 

GENERAL BUSINESS

 

i.               The Mayor to invite Councillors to nominate any item(s) on the Agenda that they wish to have a site inspection.

 

ii.             The Mayor to invite Councillors to nominate any item(s) on the Agenda that they wish to adopt in accordance with the officer’s recommendation allowing for minor changes without debate.

 

 

GB.1        Local Government and Shires Association (LGSA) - 2013 Tourism Conference 75

 

File: S02235

 

To advise Council of the Local Government and Shires Association (LGSA) 2013 Tourism Conference.

 

Recommendation:

 

That any Councillors interested in attending the 2013 LGSA Tourism Conference at Shoal Bay advise the General Manager by Friday, 8 February 2013.

 

GB.2        Request for Sponsorship - Ku-ring-gai Philharmonic Orchestra                          87

 

File: FY00275/5

 

To advise Council of a sponsorship request from the Ku-ring-gai Philharmonic Orchestra (KPO).

 

Recommendation:

 

That Council provide sponsorship of $20,000 to the Ku-ring-gai Philharmonic Orchestra.

 

GB.3        2013 LGMA National Congress and Business Expo - May 2013                           99

 

File: CY00043/5

 

To advise Councillors of the 2013 Local Government Managers Australia (LGMA) National Congress and Business Expo to be held in Hobart, Tasmania between 19 and 21 May 2013.

 

Recommendation:

 

That any Councillors interested in attending the 2013 LGMA National Congress and Business Expo in Hobart advise the General Manager by Friday, 15 February 2013.

 

GB.4        Committee on Electoral Matters Inquiry into the 2012 Local Government Elections                                                                                                                                              105

 

File: S08820

 

To consider the invitation from the Parliament of NSW Committee on Electoral Matters to make a submission to the Inquiry into the 2012 Local Government Elections.

 

Recommendation:

 

That Council consider whether to make a submission to the Committee, provide any comments for possible inclusion into the submission to the General Manager by Friday, 8 February 2013 and that a further report containing the draft submission be referred to the Ordinary Meeting of Council to be held on the 26 February 2013 for endorsement by Council before being referred to the Committee.

 

GB.5        Amendment to Council Meeting Schedule for 2013                                               112

 

File: S02355

 

To propose an amendment to Council’s adopted meeting cycle for 2013 to avoid Meetings being held during school holiday periods.

 

Recommendation:

 

That the amendments to Council’s Meeting Cycle for 2013 be adopted.

 

GB.6        Review of Financial Assistance Grants - Request for Contribution of Funds 122

 

File: S06748/3

 

To consider the request from Sutherland Shire Council to a number of Councils for a financial contribution to engage expertise by the way of a consultant to prepare a submission on behalf of the involved Councils to the review of Financial Assistance Grants (FAGs) being held by the Commonwealth Grants Commission.

 

Recommendation:

 

That Council considers whether it would like to contribute to this request for financial support from Sutherland Shire Council to engage the services of a consultant to prepare a submission to the Commission on the Financial Assistance Grants.

 

 

 

 

 

GB.7        Investment Report as at 31 December 2012                                                             139

 

File: S05273

 

To present to Council investments portfolio performance for December 2012.

 

Recommendation:

 

That the summary of investments performance for December 2012 be received and noted; and that the Certificate of the Responsible Accounting Officer be noted and report adopted. 

 

GB.8        Draft Abandoned Shopping Trolley Policy                                                               149

 

File: S02668

 

To present to Council the proposed Abandoned Shopping Trolley Policy.

 

Recommendation:

 

That the draft Abandoned Shopping Trolley Policy, as attached to this report be adopted by Council.

 

GB.9        Land Subdivision of Precinct 1 into 13 Lots                                                             163

 

File: DA0442/12

 

Ward: Roseville

Applicant/Owner: Defence Housing Australia

 

The purpose of the report is to determine the subdivision of Precinct 1 into 13 lots, consistent with the development pattern envisaged under MP06_0130.

 

Recommendation:

 

Approval.

 

GB.10      9 Wonga Wonga Street, Turramurra - Demolish Existing Dwelling and Construct a Development containing 10 Self Care Apartments over Basement Parking - SEPP (Housing for Seniors or People with a Disability) 2004                                      201

 

File: DA0385/12

 

Ward: Wahroonga

Applicant: W R L Property Group Pty Ltd

Owner: Mrs H E Wood

 

Demolish existing dwelling and construct a development containing 10 self care apartments over basement parking – SEPP (Housing for Seniors or People with a Disability) 2004.

 

Recommendation:

 

Approval.

 

GB.11      Draft Local Centres Development Control Plan for exhibition                            303

 

File: CY00054/5

 

For Council to consider the draft of the Ku-ring-gai Local Centres Development Control Plan (Attachment 1) for public exhibition.

 

Recommendation:

 

That Council endorse the draft Ku-ring-gai (Local Centres) DCP for public exhibition.

  

 

Extra Reports Circulated to Meeting

 

 

Motions of which due Notice has been given

 

NM.1       Emergency Bushfire Flyer                                                                                             317

 

File: S02546

 

Notice of Motion from Councillor Chantelle Fornari-Orsmond dated 29 January 2013

 

During the election campaign, I received numerous concerns from residents about the evacuation processes in the event of a major bushfire particularly in the North Turramurra area. This concern was also raised by NTAG when a public meeting was recently held to discuss what happens in the event of a major bushfire.

 

While Council staff and the Police that were present on the day explained the procedures of evacuation, there was only a relatively small resident’s representation present to gain an understanding of the process.

 

I have had further discussions with the Police Local Commander of the Ku-ring-gai Hornsby District and also the Local Fire Controller for the RFS. They are supportive of Council undertaking the distribution of a flyer to all residents in a bush fire prone area to advise them of what happens in the event of an emergency and when evacuation is involved.

 

It is not intended that this flyer cover material already in distribution but it is intended to be mainly directed at the evacuation process.

 

The process will involve discussions and approval of the District Emergency Management Committee and also the Bushfire Management Committee.

 

The preliminary estimates for the cost of preparing the flyer and distribution to over 15,000 residents is estimated to be less than $10,000 and it is recommended that this be considered as a project to be included in the 2013/14 budget.

 

 

 

I move that:

 

"1.     Council support the preparation of an information flyer to all houses in bushfire prone areas.

 

2.       The flyer be approved by the District Emergency Management Committee and the Bushfire Management Committee prior to printing.

 

3.       Funding of up to $10,000 be made available in the project budget for 2013/14 for possible distribution of the flyer in August/September 2013.

 

4.       Council approach the Local Community Bank to seek possible sponsorship for this project."

 

NM.2       Replacing and Upgrading Council's Public Toilets                                               319

 

File: S04461

 

Notice of Motion from Councillor Chantelle Fornari-Orsmond dated 29 January 2013

 

For quite some time I have been concerned about the standard of Council’s public toilets.  Since being elected as a Councillor I have been approached by a number of residents about the condition of Council’s public toilets in terms of appearance and cleanliness.

 

While I understand that Council has a program to gradually upgrade a number of the public toilets, I am concerned that any refurbishment work may not result in a suitable outcome in quite a number of cases.  It may be more appropriate to demolish and replace those toilets with new facilities that can incorporate self cleansing and automatic locking facilities.

 

Council is using the Local Government Renewal Scheme loan subsidy program to accelerate the upgrade to a number of facilities and it may be better to replace 2 facilities per year over the next 4 years under this program.

 

It is not intended that the new facilities funding under the Section 94 program be included in this program.

 

Therefore, I am requesting that a report be brought back for Council’s consideration as soon as possible including a review of the current public toilets upgrade program and a revised upgrade program incorporating the following objectives:

 

·        Replacing 2 toilet facilities per year with new facilities commencing in 2013/14 for
4 years

·        Upgrade 2 toilet facilities per year to include floor and wall tiling, new toilets, improve lighting and new hand basins

·        Provide Council with a maintenance schedule on the cleaning requirements that includes cleaning of the light fittings and removal of cobwebs

·        Inclusion of a sign that provides a contact number for reporting poor standards of cleaning and appearance.

 

The recent upgrade of the toilet at Wahroonga car park has incorporated a number of the above initiatives and it would be valuable for this practice to continue.

 

I move that:

 

"A report be brought back to Council reviewing the public toilet replacement and maintenance program with the aim of achieving the above objectives."

  

 

 

BUSINESS WITHOUT NOTICE – SUBJECT TO CLAUSE 241 OF GENERAL REGULATIONS

 

 

Questions Without Notice

 

 

Inspections Committee – SETTING OF TIME, DATE AND RENDEZVOUS

 

 

** ** ** ** ** **


Minute                                           Ku-ring-gai Council                                                    Page

MINUTES OF Ordinary Meeting of Council
HELD ON Tuesday, 11 December 2012

 

Present:

The Mayor, Councillor E Malicki (Chairperson) (Comenarra Ward)

Councillor J Pettett (Comenarra Ward)

Councillor D Citer (Gordon Ward)

Councillors C Berlioz & D Ossip (St Ives Ward)

Councillors J Anderson & D Armstrong (Roseville Ward)

Councillor C Fornari-Orsmond (Wahroonga Ward)

 

 

Staff Present:

General Manager (John McKee)

Director Development & Regulation (Michael Miocic)

Director Operations (Greg Piconi)

Director Community (Janice Bevan)

Director Strategy & Environment (Andrew Watson)

Acting Director Corporate (John Giovinazzo)

Acting Manager Finance (Angela Apostol)

Manager Records & Governance (Matt Ryan)

Minutes Secretary (Sigrid Banzer)

 

 

The Meeting commenced at 7.00pm

 

The Mayor offered the Prayer

 

 

368

Apologies

 

File: S02194

 

Councillor Cheryl Szatow tendered an apology for non-attendance [family reasons] and requested a leave of absence.

 

Councillor Duncan McDonald tendered an apology for non-attendance (illness) and requested a leave of absence.

 

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Fornari-Orsmond/Pettett)

 

That the apologies by Councillors Szatow and McDonald be accepted and leave of absence granted.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

 

 

 

 

DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

 

The Mayor adverted to the necessity for Councillors and staff to declare a Pecuniary Interest/Conflict of Interest in any item on the Business Paper.

 

The Mayor, Councillor Elaine Malicki declared a non significant, non pecuniary conflict of interest regarding GB.6 - 55 Killeaton Street, St Ives - Demolition of Existing Structures and Construction of Six (6) Dwellings - SEPP (Housing for Seniors or People with a Disability) [she advised that she knows a neighbour to the development and has met and been photographed with him but only in his capacity as an SES member. I don’t believe this will cloud my judgement in any way at all.]

 

 

369

CONFIRMATION OF REPORTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN CLOSED MEETING

 

File: S02499

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Ossip/Fornari-Orsmond)

 

A.     That in accordance with the provisions of Section 10 of the Local Government Act 1993, all officers’ reports be released to the press and public, with the exception of the following Confidential reports and their respective attachments:

 

C.1      Open Space Acquisition - Roseville

C.2      Rembrandt Notes 2006 - 2 "SURF" CPDO

C.3      General Manager's Performance Agreement

 

B.     That in accordance with the provisions of Section 10 of the Local Government Act 1993, all officers’ reports be released to the press and public, with the exception of confidential attachments to the following General Business reports:

 

GB.5    5 -15 Boundary Street Roseville - Supplementary Report

 

Attachment 6:      Legal Advice from HWL Ebsworth dated 21 September 2012

Attachment 7:      Legal Advice from HWL Ebsworth dated 25 October 2012

Attachment 8:       Legal Advice from HWL Ebsworth dated 26 November 2012

 

GB.10  Easement at 6 - 8A Drovers Way, Lindfield

 

Attachment 2:      Confidential A2

Attachment 3:      Confidential A3

 

GB.11  Creation of a Temporary Easement/Licence on Council's Community Land at St Ives

 

Attachment 4:     A4 - Written request with financial offer

 

GB.12  Creation of an easement for drainage purposes over Council land, Lot 7 DP16246, Edenborough Road, Lindfield

 

Attachment 3:      Valuation report

 

GB.13  Tender T67/2012 - Road and Footpath Sweeping Contract

 

Attachment 1:      Tender Committee Summary Report

Attachment 2:      Evaluation Spreadsheet

Attachment 3:      Corporate Score Card Report - All Sweeper Hire Pty Ltd

Attachment 4:      Corporate Score Card Report - Specialised Pavement Services Pty Ltd

 

GB.14  Tender T65/2012 - Princes Street Neighbourhood Centre Upgrade Works

 

Attachment 1:      Tenders Received

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

DOCUMENTS CIRCULATED TO COUNCILLORS

 

The Mayor adverted to the documents circulated in the Councillors’ papers and advised that the following matters would be dealt with at the appropriate time during the meeting:

 

Late Items:

Minutes of Ordinary Meeting of Council held 4 December 2012 - Minutes numbered 349 to 367.

 

Refer PT.1 - Petition to Rezone the Council-owned Car Park in Havilah Lane to be Operational and Facilitate the Commercial Redevelopment of Lindfield - (One Hundred and Thirty-six [136] Signatures)

 

Memorandums:

Minutes of Ordinary Meeting of Council held 20 November 2012 - Memorandum by Manager Records and Governance dated
10 December 2012 advising Councillors of the accuracy of the voting for Minute No 345 - Economic and Social Development Advisory
Committee - Appointment of Members.

 

Refer GB.5 - 5 -15 Boundary Street, Roseville - Supplementary Report - Memorandum from Director Development and Regulation dated 11 December 2012 advising Councillors of a late legal opinion submitted by the applicant on Monday, 10 December 2012.

 

Refer GB.5 - 5 -15 Boundary Street, Roseville - Supplementary Report - Memorandum from Director Development and Regulation dated 11 December 2012 advising Councillors of a typographical error in the recommendation on page 64 of the Council Meeting Business Paper in that the reference to "5-13 Boundary Street" in Part B of the recommendation is incorrect and should read "5-15 Boundary Street".

Councillors Information:

Bushfire Prone Land Maps - Memorandum from Manager Urban and Heritage Planning dated 11 December 2012 in answer to a Question Without Notice raised by Councillor David Ossip at the Ordinary Meeting of Council held on 4 December 2012

 

Traffic Flow along the Pacific Highway – Memorandum from Director operations dated 10 December 2012 in answer to a Question Without Notice raised by Councillor Duncan McDonald at the Ordinary Meeting of Council held on 4 December 2012.

 

 

Late Confidential Items:

Refer C.3 -General Manager's Performance Agreement - refer to item regarding Confidential Reports to be considered in Closed Meeting - Confidential Item circulated to Councillors ONLY

 

 

CONFIRMATION OF MINUTEs

 

 

370

Minutes of Ordinary Meeting of Council

 

File: S02131

 

 

Meeting held 4 December 2012

Minutes numbered 349 to 367

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Berlioz/Armstrong)

 

That Minutes numbered 349 to 367 circulated to Councillors were taken as read and confirmed as an accurate record of the proceedings of the Ordinary Meeting of Council held on 4 December 2012 and also included Minute No 351 [Vide Minute No 345] -Economic and Social Development Advisory Committee - Appointment of Members  of the Ordinary Meeting of Council held on 20 November 2012.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

A Motion was moved by

Councillors Anderson and Berlioz

that the Confidential Mayoral Minute be dealt with in Closed Session

at the end of the Meeting

was CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

 

PETITIONS

 

 

371

Petition to Council to Zone Council-owned Car Park in Havilah Lane as Operational and facilitate the Commercial Redevelopment of Lindfield - (Nineteen [19] Signatures)

 

File: S09449

Vide: PT.1

 

 

"We the residents of Ku-ring-gai listed below, petition the Council to rezone the Council-owned Car Park at 9 Havilah Lane, Lindfield to operational and allow its sale to facilitate the redevelopment of the Lindfield Avenue shops."

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Anderson/Armstrong)

 

That the petition be received and referred to the appropriate Officer of Council for attention.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

GENERAL BUSINESS

 

 

372

28 Wolseley Road, Lindfield - Alterations and Additions to an Existing Dwelling including the Construction of a Cabana

 

File: DA0363/12

Vide: GB.4

 

 

To determine Development Application No DA0363/12 for alterations and additions to an existing dwelling including the construction of a Cabana at 28 Wolseley Road, Lindfield.

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Anderson/Armstrong)

 

That consideration of Development Application No DA0363/12 - Alterations and Additions to an existing dwelling including the construction of a Cabana at 28 Wolseley Road, Lindfield be deferred pending a site inspection.

 

For the Resolution:                 Councillors Armstrong, Citer, Ossip, Anderson, Berlioz and Fornari-Orsmond

 

Against the Resolution:           The Mayor, Councillor E Malicki and Councillor Pettett

 

 

 

373

Christmas/New Year Recess Delegations 2012/2013

 

File: CY00259/4

Vide: GB.3

 

 

To grant appropriate Delegations during the Christmas/New Year recess period for 2012/2013

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Anderson/Armstrong)

 

A.       That the following Delegations of Authority be granted to the Mayor, Deputy Mayor and the General Manager for the Christmas/New Year recess period for 2011/2012 as follows:

 

1.       That the Mayor, Councillor Elaine Malicki, the Deputy Mayor, Councillor Cheryl Szatow and the General Manager, John McKee, be granted authority to exercise all powers, authorities, duties and functions of Council except those set out in Section 377 of the Local Government Act 1993 during the period 11 December 2012 to 5 February 2013, subject to the following conditions:

 

a.       Such powers, authorities and functions may only be exercised by unanimous agreement between the Mayor, Deputy Mayor and General Manager.

 

b.       Any such power, authority, duty or function shall only be exercised by the Mayor, Deputy Mayor and General Manager jointly where they are of the opinion that the exercise of any such power, authority, duty or function could not be deferred until the meeting of Council on 5 February 2013.

 

B.       That consultation, subject to their availability, be held with Ward Councillors on matters where they would normally be contacted before delegation is exercised.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

 

374

55 Killeaton Street, St Ives - Demolition of Existing Structures and Construction of Six (6) Dwellings - SEPP (Housing for Seniors or People with a Disability)

 

File: DA0262/12

Vide: GB.6

 

 

Demolition of existing structures and construction of six (6) dwellings – SEPP (Housing for seniors or people with a disability).

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Anderson/Berlioz)

 

PURSUANT TO SECTION 80(1) OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT ACT, 1979

 

THAT the Council, as the consent authority, grant development consent to DA0262/12 for demolition of existing structures and construction of six (6) dwellings pursuant to – SEPP (Housing for seniors or people with a disability) on land at 55 Killeaton Street, St Ives, for a period of two (2) years from the date of the Notice of Determination, subject to the following conditions:

 

Conditions that identify approved plans:

 

1.    Approved architectural plans and documentation (new development)

 

The development must be carried out in accordance with the following plans and documentation listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, except where amended by other conditions of this consent:

 

Plan no.

Drawn by

Dated

Architectural Plans:

DA01 -0 06 Amendment B

DA10

Fortey + Grant Architecture

20/09/12

DA02 Amendment C -

Bins

Located

Fortey + Grant Architecture

5/11/12

Landscape Plans:

One/Two (27.12/354) &

Two/Two (27.12/355)

Iscape Landscape

Architecture

Sept 2012

G0120189/C1 Issue 2),

C2 (Issue 3), C3 (Issue 2), C4 (Issue 2), C5 (Issue 1), C6 (Issue 3), C7 (Issue 2)

ACOR Appleyard

10 & 11/2012

 

Document(s)

Dated

Colours and finishes schedule

DA08 Amendment A, prepared by Fortey + Grant Architecture

4 July 2012

Basix certificate No. 428869M_02

26 October 2012

Arboricultural Impact Report, prepared by Guy Paroissien

24 September 2012

Access Report prepared by Mark Relf

2 October 2012

 

Reason:      To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

2.    Inconsistency between documents

 

In the event of any inconsistency between conditions of this consent and the drawings/documents referred to above, the conditions of this consent prevail.

 

Reason:      To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

3.     Approved landscape plans

 

Landscape works shall be carried out in accordance with the following landscape plan(s), listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, except where amended by other conditions of this consent:

 

Plan no.

Drawn by

Dated

27.12/354

iScape

September 2012

 

Reason:      To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

 

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to demolition, excavation or construction:

 

4.    Road opening permit

 

The opening of any footway, roadway, road shoulder or any part of the road reserve shall not be carried out without a road opening permit being obtained from Council (upon payment of the required fee) beforehand.

 

Reason:     Statutory requirement (Roads Act 1993 Section 138) and to maintain the integrity of Council’s infrastructure.

 

5.    Notice of commencement

 

At least 48 hours prior to the commencement of any development (including demolition, excavation, shoring or underpinning works), a notice of commencement of building or subdivision work form and appointment of the principal certifying authority form shall be submitted to Council.

 

Reason:      Statutory requirement.

 

6.    Notification of builder’s details

 

Prior to the commencement of any development or excavation works, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be notified in writing of the name and contractor licence number of the owner/builder intending to carry out the approved works.

 

Reason:      Statutory requirement.

 

7.    Construction and traffic management plan

 

The applicant must submit to Council a Construction Traffic Management Plan (TMP), which is to be approved prior to the commencement of any works on site.

 

The plan is to consist of a report with Traffic Control Plans attached.

 

The report is to contain commitments which must be followed by the demolition and excavation contractor, builder, owner and subcontractors.  The TMP applies to all persons associated with demolition, excavation and construction of the development.

 

The report is to contain construction vehicle routes for approach and departure to and from all directions.

 

The report is to contain a site plan showing entry and exit points.  Swept paths are to be shown on the site plan showing access and egress for an 11 metre long heavy rigid vehicle.

 

The Traffic Control Plans are to be prepared by a qualified person (red card holder).  One must be provided for each of the following stages of the works:

 

·       Demolition

·       Excavation

·       Concrete pour

·       Construction of vehicular crossing and reinstatement of footpath

·       Traffic control for vehicles reversing into or out of the site.

 

Traffic controllers must be in place at the site entry and exit points to control heavy vehicle movements in order to maintain the safety of pedestrians and other road users. 

 

When a satisfactory TMP is received, a letter of approval will be issued with conditions attached.  Traffic management at the site must comply with the approved TMP as well as any conditions in the letter issued by Council.  Council’s Rangers will be patrolling the site regularly and fines will be issued for any non-compliance with this condition.

 

All demolition and construction vehicles should be contained wholly within the site as a work zone permit will not be approved on Killeaton Street due to its close proximity to the traffic signals and ‘No Parking’ restriction on Killeaton Street unless approved by Roads & Maritime Services.

 

Reason:     To ensure that appropriate measures have been considered during all phases of the construction process in a manner that maintains the environmental amenity and ensures the ongoing safety and protection of people.

 

7a.   Construction Management Requirements - RMS

 

All demolition and construction vehicles should be contained wholly within the site as a work zone permit will not be approved on Killeaton Street due to its close proximity to the traffic. Signals.

 

All construction vehicles are to enter and leave the site in a forward direction.

 

All work associated with the proposed development is to be at no cost to the RMS.

 

Reason:  To ensure RMS requirements are satisfied.

 

8.    Sediment controls

 

Prior to any work commencing on site, sediment and erosion control measures shall be installed along the contour immediately downslope of any future disturbed areas.

 

The form of the sediment controls to be installed on the site shall be determined by reference to the ‘NSW Department of Housing manual ‘Managing Urban Stormwater: Soils and Construction’. The erosion controls shall be maintained in an operational condition until the development activities have been completed and the site fully stabilised. Sediment shall be removed from the sediment controls following each heavy or prolonged rainfall period.

 

Reason:      To preserve and enhance the natural environment.

 

9.    Erosion and drainage management

 

Earthworks and/or demolition of any existing buildings shall not commence until an erosion and sediment control plan is submitted to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority.  The plan shall comply with the guidelines set out in the NSW Department of Housing manual "Managing Urban Stormwater: Soils and Construction" certificate. Erosion and sediment control works shall be implemented in accordance with the erosion and sediment control plan.

 

Reason:      To preserve and enhance the natural environment.

 

10.   Tree protection fencing

 

To preserve the following tree/s, no work shall commence until the area beneath their canopy is fenced off at the specified radius from the trunk/s to prevent any activities, storage or the disposal of materials within the fenced area.  The fence/s shall be maintained intact until the completion of all demolition/building work on site.

 

Tree/Location

Radius from trunk

#8 x Cupressocyparis leylandii ‘Leighton’s Green’

Adjacent to eastern site boundary in neighbouring property

2.0m

 

Reason:      To protect existing trees during the construction phase.

 

11.   Tree protection fencing excluding structure

 

To preserve the following tree/s, no work shall commence until the area beneath their canopy excluding that area of the existing driveway shall be fenced off for the specified radius from the trunk to prevent any activities, storage or the disposal of materials within the fenced area.  The fence/s shall be maintained intact until the completion of all demolition/building work on site:

 

Tree/Location

Radius from trunk

#1 Syncarpia glomulifera (Turpentine)

Adjacent to south-west site corner

11.0m

#2 Eucalyptus globoidea (White Stringybark) adjacent to the site frontage

5.0m

#3 Eucalyptus scoparia (Wallangarra White Gum)

Adjacent to south-east site corner

8.5m

#4 Eucalyptus pilularis (Blackbutt)

Adjacent to eastern site boundary in front garden

8.0m

#5 Eucalyptus pilularis (Blackbutt)

Centrally located in front garden

12.0m

#6 Eucalyptus saligna (Sydney Blue Gum)

Centrally located in front garden

12.0m

 

Reason:      To protect existing trees during the construction phase.

 

12.   Tree protective fencing type galvanised mesh

 

The tree protection fencing shall be constructed of galvanised pipe at 2.4 metre spacing and connected by securely attached chain mesh fencing to a minimum height of 1.8 metres in height prior to work commencing.

 

Reason:     To protect existing trees during construction phase.

 

13.   Tree protection signage

 

Prior to works commencing, tree protection signage is to be attached to each tree protection zone, displayed in a prominent position and the sign repeated at 10 metres intervals or closer where the fence changes direction.  Each sign shall contain in a clearly legible form, the following information:

 

Tree protection zone.

 

·       This fence has been installed to prevent damage to the trees and their growing environment both above and below ground and access is restricted.

·       Any encroachment not previously approved within the tree protection zone shall be the subject of an arborist's report.

·       The arborist's report shall provide proof that no other alternative is available.

·       The Arborist's report shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority for further consultation with Council.

·       The name, address, and telephone number of the developer.

 

Reason:      To protect existing trees during the construction phase.

 

14.   Tree protection mulching

 

Prior to works commencing and throughout construction, the area of the tree protection zone is to be mulched to a depth of 100mm with composted organic material being 75% Eucalyptus leaf litter and 25% wood.

 

Reason:      To protect existing trees during the construction phase.

 

15.   Tree protection – avoiding soil compaction

 

To preserve the following tree/s and avoid soil compaction, no work shall commence until temporary measures to avoid soil compaction (eg rumble boards) as per AS4970-2009 within the specified radius of the following tree/s is/are installed:

 

Tree/Location

Radius from trunk

#1 Syncarpia glomulifera (Turpentine)

Adjacent to south-west site corner

11.0m

#2 Eucalyptus globoidea (White Stringybark) adjacent to the site frontage

5.0m

#3 Eucalyptus scoparia (Wallangarra White Gum)

Adjacent to south-east site corner

8.5m

#4 Eucalyptus pilularis (Blackbutt)

Adjacent to eastern site boundary in front garden

8.0m

#5 Eucalyptus pilularis (Blackbutt)

Centrally located in front garden

12.0m

#6 Eucalyptus saligna (Sydney Blue Gum)

Centrally located in front garden

12.0m

 

Reason:      To protect existing trees during the construction phase.

 

16.   Tree fencing inspection

 

Upon installation of the required tree protection measures, an inspection of the site by the Principal Certifying Authority is required to verify that tree protection measures comply with all relevant conditions.

 

Reason:      To protect existing trees during the construction phase.

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of the construction certificate:

 

17.   Amendments to approved landscape plan

 

Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the approved landscape plans, listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, have been amended in accordance with the requirements of this condition as well as other conditions of this consent:

 

Plan no.

Drawn by

Dated

27.12/354

iScape

September 2012

 

The above landscape plan(s) shall be amended in the following ways:

 

·       The proposed masonry courtyard wall for Unit 6 is to be deleted, existing levels and grades retained and the fence constructed as a lightweight structure (as per arborist’s recommendations).

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the landscape plan has been amended as required by this condition.

 

Note:     An amended plan, prepared by a landscape architect or qualified landscape designer shall be submitted to the Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:     To ensure adequate landscaping of the site.

 

18.   Amendments to approved architectural plan/s

 

Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the approved architectural plans, listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, have been amended in accordance with the requirements of this condition as well as other conditions of this consent:

 

Plan no.

Drawn by

Dated

DA-01 B

DA-02 B

DA-04 B

DA-05 B

DA-06 B

Fortey + Grant

20/09/2012

 

The above architectural plan(s) shall be amended in the following ways:

 

·       The masonry courtyard wall for Unit 6 is to be deleted, existing levels and grades retained and the fence constructed as a lightweight structure (as per arborist’s recommendations).

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the architectural plans have been amended as required by this condition.

 

Note:     Amended plans, prepared by a suitably qualified professional shall be submitted to the Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:      To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

19.   Long service levy

 

In accordance with Section 109F(i) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act a Construction Certificate shall not be issued until any long service levy payable under Section 34 of the Building and Construction Industry Long Service Payments Act 1986 (or where such levy is payable by instalments, the first instalment of the levy) has been paid. Council is authorised to accept payment. Where payment has been made elsewhere, proof of payment is to be provided to Council.

 

Reason:      Statutory requirement.

 

20.   Builder’s indemnity insurance

 

The applicant, builder, developer or person who does the work on this development, must arrange builder’s indemnity insurance and submit the certificate of insurance in accordance with the requirements of Part 6 of the Home Building Act 1989 to the Certifying Authority for endorsement of the plans accompanying the Construction Certificate.

 

It is the responsibility of the applicant, builder or developer to arrange the builder's indemnity insurance for residential building work over the value of $20,000. The builder's indemnity insurance does not apply to commercial or industrial building work or to residential work valued at less than $20,000, nor to work undertaken by persons holding an owner/builder's permit issued by the Department of Fair Trading (unless the owner/builder's property is sold within 7 years of the commencement of the work).

 

Reason:      Statutory requirement.

 

21.   Outdoor lighting

 

Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that all outdoor lighting will comply with AS/NZ1158.3: 1999 Pedestrian Area (Category P) Lighting and AS4282: 1997 Control of the Obtrusive Effects of Outdoor Lighting.

 

Note:         Details demonstrating compliance with these requirements are to be submitted prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate.

 

Reason:    To provide high quality external lighting for security without adverse affects on public amenity from excessive illumination levels.

 

22.   Access for people with disabilities (residential)

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that access for people with disabilities to and from and between the public domain, residential units and all common open space areas is provided. Consideration must be given to the means of dignified and equitable access.

 

Compliant access provisions for people with disabilities shall be clearly shown on the  plans submitted with the Construction Certificate.  All details shall be provided to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate. All details shall be prepared in consideration of the Disability Discrimination Act, and the relevant provisions of AS1428.1, AS1428.2, AS1428.4 and AS 1735.12.

 

Reason:     To ensure the provision of equitable and dignified access for all people in accordance with disability discrimination legislation and relevant Australian Standards.

 

23.   Stormwater management plan

 

Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, the applicant must submit, for approval by the Principal Certifying Authority, scale construction plans and specifications in relation to the stormwater management and disposal system for the development. The plan(s) must be based on Stormwater Management Plans Job No. GO120189, Drawing No. C1 to C7 issue 2, dated September 2012, prepared by ACOR Appleyard Consultants Pty Ltd and must include the following detail:

 

·       exact location and reduced level of discharge point to the public drainage system

·       Layout of the property drainage system components, including but not limited to (as required) gutters, downpipes, spreaders,  pits, swales, kerbs, cut-off and intercepting drainage structures, subsoil drainage, flushing facilities and all ancillary stormwater plumbing - all designed for a 235mm/hour rainfall intensity for a duration of five (5) minutes (1:50 year storm recurrence)

·       location(s), dimensions and specifications for the required rainwater storage and reuse tanks and systems and where proprietary products are to be used, manufacturer specifications or equivalent shall be provided

·       specifications for reticulated pumping facilities (including pump type and manufacturer specifications) and ancillary plumbing to fully utilise rainwater in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Council Development Control Plan 47 and/or BASIX commitments

·       details of the required on-site detention tanks required by Ku-ring-gai Water Management DCP 47, including dimensions, materials, locations, orifice and discharge control pit details as required (refer Chapter 6 and Appendices 2, 3 and 5 of DCP 47 for volume, PSD and design requirements)

·       the required basement stormwater pump-out system is to cater for driveway runoff and subsoil drainage (refer appendix 7.1.1 of Development Control Plan 47 for design)

 

The above construction drawings and specifications are to be prepared by a qualified and experienced civil/hydraulic engineer in accordance with Council’s Water Management Development Control Plan 47, Australian Standards 3500.2 and 3500.3 - Plumbing and Drainage Code and the Building Code of Australia.

 

Reason:      To protect the environment.

 

24.   Stormwater retention / detention

 

Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that:

 

1.     A mandatory rainwater retention and re-use system, comprising storage tanks and ancillary plumbing is provided. The minimum total storage volume of the rainwater tank system, and the prescribed re-use of the water on site must satisfy all relevant BASIX commitments and the requirements specified in Chapter 6 of Ku-ring-gai Water Management Development Control Plan 47; and

 

2.     An on-site stormwater detention system must be provided to control the rate of runoff leaving the site. The minimum volume of the required on-site detention system must be determined in accordance with Chapter 6 of the Ku-ring-gai Council Water Management Development Control Plan 47 - having regard to the specified volume concession offered in lieu of installing rainwater retention tanks. The on-site detention system must be designed by a qualified civil/hydraulic engineer and must satisfy the design controls set out in Appendix 5 of DCP 47.

 

Reason:      To protect the environment.

 

24a. Stormwater discharge

 

Council should ensure that post-development storm water discharge from the subject site into the RMS drainage system does not exceed the pre-development discharge. Should there be changes to RMS drainage system then detailed design plans and hydraulic calculations of the stormwater drainage system are to be submitted to RMS for approval, prior to the commencement of any works.

 

Details should be forwarded to:

 

The Sydney Asset Management

Roads and Maritime Services

P0 Box 973 Parramatta CBD 2124.

 

A plan checking fee will be payable and a performance bond may be required before RMS approval is issued. With regard to the Civil Works requirement please contact the RMS Project Engineer, External Works -on (02) 8849 2114 or fax (02) 8849 2766.

 

Reason:  Satisfy requirements by RMS.

 

25.   Paving near trees

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that paving works within the specified radius of the trunk/s of the following tree/s will be of a type and construction to ensure that existing water infiltration and gaseous exchange to the tree/s root system is maintained:

 

Tree/Location

Radius from trunk

#1 Syncarpia glomulifera (Turpentine)

Adjacent to south-west site corner

11.0m

#3 Eucalyptus scoparia (Wallangarra White Gum)

Adjacent to south-east site corner

8.5m

#4 Eucalyptus pilularis (Blackbutt)

Adjacent to eastern site boundary in front garden

8.0m

#5 Eucalyptus pilularis (Blackbutt)

Centrally located in front garden

12.0m

#6 Eucalyptus saligna (Sydney Blue Gum)

Centrally located in front garden

12.0m

 

Note:     Details of the paving prepared by a suitably qualified professional shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:      To protect existing trees.

 

26.   Noise from plant in residential zone

 

Where any form of mechanical ventilation equipment or other noise generating plant is proposed as part of the development, prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate the Certifying Authority, shall be satisfied that the operation of an individual piece of equipment or operation of equipment in combination will not exceed more than 5dB(A) above the background level during the day when measured at the site’s boundaries and shall not exceed the background level at night (10.00pm –6.00 am) when measured at the boundary of the site.

 

C1.  Note:  A certificate from an appropriately qualified acoustic engineer is to be submitted with the Construction Certificate, certifying that all mechanical ventilation equipment or other noise generating plant in isolation or in combination with other plant will comply with the above requirements.

 

Reason:      To comply with best practice standards for residential acoustic amenity.

 

27.   Driveway crossing levels

 

Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, driveway and associated footpath levels for any new, reconstructed or extended sections of driveway crossings between the property boundary and road alignment must be obtained from Ku-ring-gai Council. Such levels are only able to be issued by Council under the Roads Act 1993.  All footpath crossings, laybacks and driveways are to be constructed according to Council's specifications "Construction of Gutter Crossings and Footpath Crossings".

 

Specifications are issued with alignment levels after completing the necessary application form at Customer Services and payment of the assessment fee. When completing the request for driveway levels application from Council, the applicant must attach a copy of the relevant development application drawing which indicates the position and proposed level of the proposed driveway at the boundary alignment.

 

This development consent is for works wholly within the property. Development consent does not imply approval of footpath or driveway levels, materials or location within the road reserve, regardless of whether this information is shown on the development application plans. The grading of such footpaths or driveways outside the property shall comply with Council's standard requirements.  The suitability of the grade of such paths or driveways inside the property is the sole responsibility of the applicant and the required alignment levels fixed by Council may impact upon these levels.

 

The construction of footpaths and driveways outside the property in materials other than those approved by Council is not permitted.

 

Reason:      To provide suitable vehicular access without disruption to pedestrian and vehicular traffic.

 

28.   Drainage of paved areas

 

All new exposed impervious areas graded towards adjacent property and/or habitable areas are to be drained via the main drainage system. This may require the installation of suitable inlets pits, cut-off structures (e.g. kerb), and/or barriers that direct such runoff to the formal drainage system. Details of such measures shall be shown on the Construction Certificate drawings, to the satisfaction of the Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:      To control surface run off and protect the environment.

 

29.   Vehicular access and garaging

 

Driveways and vehicular access ramps must be designed not to scrape the underside of cars. In all respects, the proposed vehicle access and accommodation arrangements must be designed and constructed to comply with Australian Standard 2890.1 – 2004 “Off-Street car parking”. Details are to be provided to and approved by the Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate.

 

Reason:      To ensure that parking spaces are in accordance with the approved development.

 

30.   Utility provider requirements

 

Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, the applicant must make contact with all relevant utility providers whose services will be impacted upon by the development. A written copy of the requirements of each provider, as determined necessary by the Certifying Authority, must be obtained.  All utility services or appropriate conduits for the same must be provided by the developer in accordance with the specifications of the utility providers.

 

Reason:      To ensure compliance with the requirements of relevant utility providers.

 

31.   Underground services

 

All electrical services (existing and proposed) shall be undergrounded from the proposed building on the site to the appropriate power pole(s) or other connection point. Undergrounding of services must not disturb the root system of existing trees and shall be undertaken in accordance with the requirements of the relevant service provided. Documentary evidence that the relevant service provider has been consulted and that their requirements have been met are to be provided to the Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate. All electrical and telephone services to the subject property must be placed underground and any redundant poles are to be removed at the expense of the applicant.

 

Reason:      To provide infrastructure that facilitates the future improvement of the streetscape by relocation of overhead lines below ground.

 

31a. Swept paths - RMS

 

The swept path of the longest vehicle (including garbage trucks) entering and exiting the subject site, as well as manoeuvrability through the site and loading area, shall be in accordance with AUSTROADS. In this regard, a plan shall be submitted to Council for approval, which shows that the proposed development complies with this requirement.

 

Reason:  To ensure requirements of RMS are satisfied.

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of the construction certificate or prior to demolition, excavation or construction (whichever comes first):

 

32.   Infrastructure restorations fee

 

To ensure that damage to Council Property as a result of construction activity is rectified in a timely matter:

 

a)      All work or activity taken in furtherance of the development the subject of this approval must be undertaken in a manner to avoid damage to Council Property and must not jeopardise the safety of any person using or occupying the adjacent public areas.

 

b)      The applicant, builder, developer or any person acting in reliance on this approval shall be responsible for making good any damage to Council Property, and for the removal from Council Property of any waste bin, building materials, sediment, silt, or any other material or article.

 

c)      The Infrastructure Restoration Fee must be paid to the Council by the applicant prior to both the issue of the Construction Certificate and the commencement of any earthworks or construction.

 

d)      In consideration of payment of the Infrastructure Restorations Fee, Council will undertake such inspections of Council Property as Council considers necessary and also undertake, on behalf of the applicant, such restoration work to Council Property, if any, that Council considers necessary as a consequence of the development. The provision of such restoration work by the Council does not absolve any person of the responsibilities contained in (a) to (b) above. Restoration work to be undertaken by the Council referred to in this condition is limited to work that can be undertaken by Council at a cost of not more than the Infrastructure Restorations Fee payable pursuant to this condition.

 

e)      In this condition:

 

“Council Property” includes any road, footway, footpath paving, kerbing, guttering, crossings, street furniture, seats, letter bins, trees, shrubs, lawns, mounds, bushland, and similar structures or features on any road or public road within the meaning of the Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) or any public place; and

 

“Infrastructure Restoration Fee” means the Infrastructure Restorations Fee calculated in accordance with the Schedule of Fees & Charges adopted by Council as at the date of payment and the cost of any inspections required by the Council of Council Property associated with this condition.

 

Reason:      To maintain public infrastructure.

 

33.   Section 94 Development Contributions - Non-Centres.

(For DAs determined on or after 19 December 2010).

 

This development is subject to a development contribution calculated in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010, being a s94 Contributions Plan in effect under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, as follows:

 

Key Community Infrastructure

Amount

Local parks and local sporting facilities

$61,903.96

Local recreation and cultural facilities;

Local social facilities

$10,593.69

Total:

$72,497.65

 

The contribution shall be paid to Council prior to the issue of any Construction Certificate, Linen Plan, Certificate of Subdivision or Occupation Certificate whichever comes first in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010.

 

The contributions specified above are subject to indexation and may vary at the time of payment in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 to reflect changes in the consumer price index and housing price index.  Prior to payment, please contact Council directly to verify the current payable contributions.

 

Copies of Council’s Contribution Plans can be viewed at Council Chambers, 818 Pacific Hwy Gordon or on Council’s website at www.kmc.nsw.gov.au.

 

Reason:     To ensure the provision, extension or augmentation of the Key Community Infrastructure identified in Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 that will, or is likely to be, required as a consequence of the development.

 

Conditions to be satisfied during the demolition, excavation and construction phases:

 

34.   Prescribed conditions

 

The applicant shall comply with any relevant prescribed conditions of development consent under clause 98 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation. For the purposes of section 80A (11) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, the following conditions are prescribed in relation to a development consent for development that involves any building work:

 

·       The work must be carried out in accordance with the requirements of the Building Code of Australia

·       In the case of residential building work for which the Home Building Act 1989 requires there to be a contract of insurance in force in accordance with Part 6 of that Act, that such a contract of insurance is in force before any works commence.

 

Reason:      Statutory requirement.

 

35.   Hours of work

 

Demolition, excavation, construction work and deliveries of building material and equipment must not take place outside the hours of 7.00am to 5.00pm Monday to Friday and 8.00am to 12 noon Saturday. No work and no deliveries are to take place on Sundays and public holidays.

 

Excavation or removal of any materials using machinery of any kind, including compressors and jack hammers, must be limited to between 7.30am and 5.00pm Monday to Friday, with a respite break of 45 minutes between 12 noon 1.00pm.

 

Where it is necessary for works to occur outside of these hours (ie) placement of concrete for large floor areas on large residential/commercial developments or where building processes require the use of oversized trucks and/or cranes that are restricted by the RTA from travelling during daylight hours to deliver, erect or remove machinery, tower cranes, pre-cast panels, beams, tanks or service equipment to or from the site, approval for such activities will be subject to the issue of an "outside of hours works permit" from Council as well as notification of the surrounding properties likely to be affected by the proposed works.

 

Note:            Failure to obtain a permit to work outside of the approved hours will result in on the spot fines being issued.

 

Reason:      To ensure reasonable standards of amenity for occupants of neighbouring properties.

 

36.   Approved plans to be on site

 

A copy of all approved and certified plans, specifications and documents incorporating conditions of consent and certification (including the Construction Certificate if required for the work) shall be kept on site at all times during the demolition, excavation and construction phases and must be readily available to any officer of Council or the Principal Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:      To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

37.   Statement of compliance with Australian Standards

 

The demolition work shall comply with the provisions of Australian Standard AS2601: 2001 The Demolition of Structures. The work plans required by AS2601: 2001 shall be accompanied by a written statement from a suitably qualified person that the proposal contained in the work plan comply with the safety requirements of the Standard. The work plan and the statement of compliance shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the commencement of any works.

 

Reason:      To ensure compliance with the Australian Standards.

 

 

38.   Site notice

 

A site notice shall be erected on the site prior to any work commencing and shall be displayed throughout the works period.

 

The site notice must:

 

·       be prominently displayed at the boundaries of the site for the purposes of informing the public that unauthorised entry to the site is not permitted

·       display project details including, but not limited to the details of the builder, Principal Certifying Authority and structural engineer

·       be durable and weatherproof

·       display the approved hours of work, the name of the site/project manager, the responsible managing company (if any), its address and 24 hour contact phone number for any inquiries, including construction/noise complaint are to be displayed on the site notice

·       be mounted at eye level on the perimeter hoardings/fencing and is to state that unauthorised entry to the site is not permitted

 

Reason:      To ensure public safety and public information.

 

39.   Dust control

 

During excavation, demolition and construction, adequate measures shall be taken to prevent dust from affecting the amenity of the neighbourhood. The following measures must be adopted:

 

·       physical barriers shall be erected at right angles to the prevailing wind direction or shall be placed around or over dust sources to prevent wind or activity from generating dust

·       earthworks and scheduling activities shall be managed to coincide with the next stage of development to minimise the amount of time the site is left cut or exposed

·       all materials shall be stored or stockpiled at the best locations

·       the ground surface should be dampened slightly to prevent dust from becoming airborne but should not be wet to the extent that run-off occurs

·       all vehicles carrying spoil or rubble to or from the site shall at all times be covered to prevent the escape of dust

·       all equipment wheels shall be washed before exiting the site using manual or automated sprayers and drive-through washing bays

·       gates shall be closed between vehicle movements and shall be fitted with shade cloth

·       cleaning of footpaths and roadways shall be carried out daily

 

Reason:      To protect the environment and amenity of surrounding properties.

 

40.   Use of road or footpath

 

During excavation, demolition and construction phases, no building materials, plant or the like are to be stored on the road or footpath without written approval being obtained from Council beforehand.  The pathway shall be kept in a clean, tidy and safe condition during building operations.  Council reserves the right, without notice, to rectify any such breach and to charge the cost against the applicant/owner/builder, as the case may be.

 

Reason:      To ensure safety and amenity of the area.

 

41.   Toilet facilities

 

During excavation, demolition and construction phases, toilet facilities are to be provided, on the work site, at the rate of one toilet for every 20 persons or part of 20 persons employed at the site.

 

Reason:      Statutory requirement.

 

42.   Protection of public places

 

If the work involved in the erection, demolition or construction of the development is likely to cause pedestrian or vehicular traffic in a public place to be obstructed or rendered inconvenient, or building involves the enclosure of a public place, a hoarding or fence must be erected between the work site and the public place.

 

If necessary, a hoarding is to be erected, sufficient to prevent any substance from, or in connection with, the work falling into the public place.

 

The work site must be kept lit between sunset and sunrise if it is likely to be hazardous to persons in the public place.

 

Any hoarding, fence or awning is to be removed when the work has been completed.

 

Reason:      To protect public places.

 

43.   Recycling of building material (general)

 

During demolition and construction, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that building materials suitable for recycling have been forwarded to an appropriate registered business dealing in recycling of materials. Materials to be recycled must be kept in good order.

 

Reason:      To facilitate recycling of materials.

 

44.   Road reserve safety

 

All public footways and roadways fronting and adjacent to the site must be maintained in a safe condition at all times during the course of the development works. Construction materials must not be stored in the road reserve. A safe pedestrian circulation route and a pavement/route free of trip hazards must be maintained at all times on or adjacent to any public access ways fronting the construction site.  Where public infrastructure is damaged, repair works must be carried out when and as directed by Council officers. Where pedestrian circulation is diverted on to the roadway or verge areas, clear directional signage and protective barricades must be installed in accordance with AS1742-3 (1996) “Traffic Control Devices for Work on Roads”. If pedestrian circulation is not satisfactorily maintained across the site frontage, and action is not taken promptly to rectify the defects, Council may undertake proceedings to stop work.

 

Reason:      To ensure safe public footways and roadways during construction.

 

45.   Services

 

Where required, the adjustment or inclusion of any new utility service facilities must be carried out by the applicant and in accordance with the requirements of the relevant utility authority. These works shall be at no cost to Council. It is the applicants’ full responsibility to make contact with the relevant utility authorities to ascertain the impacts of the proposal upon utility services (including water, phone, gas and the like). Council accepts no responsibility for any matter arising from its approval to this application involving any influence upon utility services provided by another authority.

 

Reason:      Provision of utility services.

 

46.   Erosion control

 

Temporary sediment and erosion control and measures are to be installed prior to the commencement of any works on the site. These measures must be maintained in working order during construction works up to completion. All sediment traps must be cleared on a regular basis and after each major storm and/or as directed by the Principal Certifying Authority and Council officers.

 

Reason:      To protect the environment from erosion and sedimentation.

 

47.   Drainage to street

 

Stormwater runoff from all new impervious areas and subsoil drainage systems shall be piped to the street drainage system.  New drainage line connections to the street drainage system shall conform and comply with the requirements of Sections 5.3 and 5.4 of Ku-ring-gai Water Management Development Control Plan No. 47.

 

Reason:      To protect the environment.

 

48.   Grated drain at garage

 

A 200mm wide grated channel/trench drain, with a heavy-duty removable galvanised grate is to be provided in front of the garage door/basement parking slab to collect driveway runoff. The channel drain shall be connected to the main drainage system and must have an outlet of minimum diameter 150mm to prevent blockage by silt and debris.

 

Reason:      Stormwater control.

 

49.   Sydney Water Section 73 Compliance Certificate

 

The applicant must obtain a Section 73 Compliance Certificate under the Sydney Water Act 1994. An application must be made through an authorised Water Servicing
Co-ordinator. The applicant is to refer to “Your Business” section of Sydney Water’s web site at www.sydneywater.com.au then the “e-develop” icon or telephone 13 20 92. Following application a “Notice of Requirements” will detail water and sewer extensions to be built and charges to be paid. Please make early contact with the
Co-ordinator, since building of water/sewer extensions can be time consuming and may impact on other services and building, driveway or landscape design.

 

Reason:      Statutory requirement.

 

50.   Arborist’s report

 

The tree/s to be retained shall be inspected, monitored and treated by an AQF5 Arborist during and after completion of development works to ensure their long term survival.  Regular inspections and documentation from the Arborist to the Principal Certifying Authority is required at the following times or phases of work:

 

Tree/Location

Time of inspection

#1 Syncarpia glomulifera (Turpentine)

Adjacent to south-west site corner

* Immediately prior to the commencement of ANY works on site.

 

* At the completion of demolition works and prior to regrading.

 

*At the completion of grading works.

 

*Prior to the pouring of concrete slabs

 

* At three monthly intervals during construction works

 

* Direct supervision of existing driveway removal and new driveway construction

 

* At the completion of all works on site

#3 Eucalyptus scoparia (Wallangarra White Gum)

Adjacent to south-east site corner

#4 Eucalyptus pilularis (Blackbutt)

Adjacent to eastern site boundary in front garden

#5 Eucalyptus pilularis (Blackbutt)

Centrally located in front garden

#6 Eucalyptus saligna (Sydney Blue Gum)

Centrally located in front garden

#9 Erythrina crista galli (Cockscomb Coral Tree)

Adjacent to eastern site boundary in neighbouring property

 

#2 Eucalyptus globoidea (White Stringybark) adjacent to site frontage

 

Reason:      To ensure protection of existing trees.

 

51.   Treatment of tree roots

 

If tree roots are severed for the purposes of constructing the approved works, they shall be cut cleanly by hand, by an experienced AQF3 Arborist/Horticulturist.  All pruning works shall be undertaken as specified in Australian Standard 4373-2007 – Pruning of Amenity Trees.

 

Reason:      To protect existing trees.

 

52.   Cutting of tree roots

 

No tree roots of 30mm or greater in diameter located within the specified radius of the trunk/s of the following tree/s shall be severed or injured in the process of any works during the construction period.  All pruning works shall be undertaken as specified in Australian Standard 4373-2007 – Pruning of Amenity Trees:

 

Tree/Location

Radius from trunk

#1 Syncarpia glomulifera (Turpentine)

Adjacent to south-west site corner

11.0m

#3 Eucalyptus scoparia (Wallangarra White Gum)

Adjacent to south-east site corner

8.5m

#4 Eucalyptus pilularis (Blackbutt)

Adjacent to eastern site boundary in front garden

8.0m

#5 Eucalyptus pilularis (Blackbutt)

Centrally located in front garden

12.0m

#6 Eucalyptus saligna (Sydney Blue Gum)

Centrally located in front garden

12.0m

#8 x Cupressocyparis leylandii ‘Leighton’s Green’

Adjacent to eastern site boundary in neighbouring property

3.0m

#9 Erythrina crista galli (Cockscomb Coral Tree)

Adjacent to eastern site boundary in neighbouring property

6.0m

 

Reason:      To protect existing trees.

 

53.   Approved tree works

 

Approval is given for the following works to be undertaken to trees on the site. All trees are to be clearly tagged and numbered consistent with the arborists report prior to the removal of any trees.

 

Tree/Location

Approved tree works

#7 Callistemon viminalis (Weeping Bottlebrush)

Adjacent to western site boundary in front garden

Removal

 

Removal or pruning of any other tree on the site is not approved, excluding species exempt under Council’s Tree Preservation Order.

 

Reason:      To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

54.   Hand excavation

 

All excavation within the specified radius of the trunk/s of the following tree/s shall be hand dug:

 

Tree/Location

Radius from trunk

#1 Syncarpia glomulifera (Turpentine)

Adjacent to south-west site corner

11.0m

#2 Eucalyptus globoidea (White Stringybark) adjacent to the site frontage

5.0m

#3 Eucalyptus scoparia (Wallangarra White Gum)

Adjacent to south-east site corner

8.5m

#4 Eucalyptus pilularis (Blackbutt)

Adjacent to eastern site boundary in front garden

8.0m

#5 Eucalyptus pilularis (Blackbutt)

Centrally located in front garden

12.0m

#6 Eucalyptus saligna (Sydney Blue Gum)

Centrally located in front garden

12.0m

#8 x Cupressocyparis leylandii ‘Leighton’s Green’

Adjacent to eastern site boundary in neighbouring property

3.0m

#9 Erythrina crista galli (Cockscomb Coral Tree)

Adjacent to eastern site boundary in neighbouring property

6.0m

 

Reason:      To protect existing trees.

 

55.   No storage of materials beneath trees

 

No activities, storage or disposal of materials shall take place beneath the canopy of any tree protected under Council's Tree Preservation Order at any time.

 

Reason:      To protect existing trees.

 

56.   Removal of refuse

 

All builders' refuse, spoil and/or material unsuitable for use in landscape areas shall be removed from the site on completion of the building works.

 

Reason:      To protect the environment.

 

57.   Canopy replenishment trees to be planted

 

The canopy replenishment trees to be planted shall be maintained in a healthy and vigorous condition until they attain a height of 5.0 metres whereby they will be protected by Council’s Tree Preservation Order.  Any of the trees found faulty, damaged, dying or dead shall be replaced with the same species.

 

Reason:      To maintain the treed character of the area.

 

58.   Driveway removal/tree protection

 

To minimise adverse impacts to retained trees the following is to be undertaken;

 

·       The existing concrete driveway be removed in sections using small plant eg bobcat and hand tools under the direct supervision of the AQF5 project arborist

·       Existing roots under the driveway shall be covered with a minimum of 75mm depth of moistened washed river sand or soil mix to prevent drying out and desiccation until the final soil mix and mulch is added to the area.

 

Reason:      To protect existing trees.

 

59.   Existing driveway/site access

 

To minimise adverse impacts to existing trees, the existing concrete driveway is to be retained in situ until the completion of construction works for the new dwellings and the majority of landscape hard works.

 

Reason:      To protect existing trees.

 

60.   On site retention of waste dockets

 

All demolition, excavation and construction waste dockets are to be retained on site, or at suitable location, in order to confirm which facility received materials generated from the site for recycling or disposal.

 

·       Each docket is to be an official receipt from a facility authorised to accept the material type, for disposal or processing.

·       This information is to be made available at the request of an Authorised Officer of Council.

 

Reason:     To protect the environment.

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate:

 

61.   Compliance with BASIX Certificate

 

Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that all commitments listed in BASIX Certificate No.428869M_02 have been complied with.

 

Reason:      Statutory requirement.

 

62.   Mechanical ventilation

 

Following completion, installation and testing of all the mechanical ventilation systems, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied of the following prior to the issue of any Occupation Certificate:

 

1.      The installation and performance of the mechanical systems complies with:

 

·       The Building Code of Australia

·       Australian Standard AS1668

·       Australian Standard AS3666 where applicable

 

2.      The mechanical ventilation system in isolation and in association with other mechanical ventilation equipment, when in operation will not be audible within a habitable room in any other residential premises before 7am and after 10pm Monday to Friday and before 8am and after 10pm Saturday, Sunday and public holidays. The operation of the unit outside these restricted hours shall emit a noise level of not greater than 5dbA above the background when measured at the nearest adjoining boundary.

 

Note:     Written confirmation from an acoustic engineer that the development achieves the above requirements is to be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate.

 

Reason:      To protect the amenity of surrounding properties.

 

63.   Completion of landscape works

 

Prior to the release of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that all landscape works, including the removal of all noxious and/or environmental weed species, have been undertaken in accordance with the approved plan(s) and conditions of consent.

 

Reason:      To ensure that the landscape works are consistent with the development consent.

 

64.   Retention and re-use positive covenant

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the applicant must create a positive covenant and restriction on the use of land under Section 88E of the Conveyancing Act 1919, burdening the property with the requirement to maintain the site stormwater retention and re-use facilities on the property.

 

The terms of the instruments are to be generally in accordance with the Council's "draft terms of Section 88B instruments for protection of retention and re-use facilities" and to the satisfaction of Council (refer to appendices of Ku-ring-gai Water Management Development Control Plan No. 47). For existing titles, the positive covenant and the restriction on the use of land is to be created through an application to the Land Titles Office in the form of a request using forms 13PC and 13RPA. The relative location of the reuse and retention facility, in relation to the building footprint, must be shown on a scale sketch, attached as an annexure to the request forms.

 

Registered title documents showing the covenants and restrictions must be submitted to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate.

 

Reason:      To protect the environment.

 

65.   Provision of copy of OSD designs if Council is not the PCA

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the following must be provided to Council’s Development Engineer:

 

·       A copy of the approved Construction Certificate stormwater detention/retention design for the site

·       A copy of any works-as-executed drawings required by this consent

·       The Engineer’s certification of the as-built system.

 

Reason:      For Council to maintain its database of as-constructed on-site stormwater detention systems.

 

66.   Certification of drainage works

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that:

 

·       the stormwater drainage works have been satisfactorily completed in accordance with the approved Construction Certificate drainage plans

·       the minimum retention and on-site detention storage volume requirements of BASIX and Ku-ring-gai Water Management Development Control Plan No. 47 respectively, have been achieved

·       retained water is connected and available for use

·       basement and subsoil areas are able to drain via a pump/sump system installed in accordance with AS3500.3 and Appendix 7.1.1 of Ku-ring-gai Water Management Development Control Plan No. 47

·       all grates potentially accessible by children are secured

·       components of the new drainage system have been installed by a licensed plumbing contractor in accordance with the Plumbing and Drainage Code AS3500.3 2003 and the Building Code of Australia

·       all enclosed floor areas, including habitable and garage floor levels, are safeguarded from outside stormwater runoff ingress by suitable differences in finished levels, gradings and provision of stormwater collection devices

 

The rainwater certification sheet contained in Appendix 13 of the Ku-ring-gai Water Management Development Control Plan No. 47, must be completed and attached to the certification. Where an on-site detention system has been constructed, the on-site detention certification sheet contained in Appendix 4 of DCP 47 must also be completed and attached to the certification.

 

Note:     Evidence from a qualified and experienced consulting civil/hydraulic engineer documenting compliance with the above is to be provided to Council prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate.

 

Reason:      To protect the environment.

 

67.   WAE plans for stormwater management and disposal (dual occupancy and above)

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, a registered surveyor must provide a works as executed survey of the completed stormwater drainage and management systems. The survey must be submitted to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate. The survey must indicate:

 

·       as built (reduced) surface and invert levels for all drainage pits

·       gradients of drainage lines, materials and dimensions

·       as built (reduced) level(s) at the approved point of discharge to the public drainage system

·       as built location and internal dimensions of all detention and retention structures on the property (in plan view) and horizontal distances to nearest adjacent boundaries and structures on site

·       the achieved storage volumes of the installed retention and detention storages and derivative calculations

·       as built locations of all access pits and grates in the detention and retention system(s), including dimensions

·       the size of the orifice or control fitted to any on-site detention system

·       dimensions of the discharge control pit and access grates

·       the maximum depth of storage possible over the outlet control

·       top water levels of storage areas and indicative RL’s through the overland flow path in the event of blockage of the on-site detention system

 

The works as executed plan(s) must show the as built details above in comparison to those shown on the drainage plans approved with the Construction Certificate prior to commencement of works. All relevant levels and details indicated must be marked in red on a copy of the Principal Certifying Authority stamped construction certificate stormwater plans.

 

Reason:      To protect the environment.

 

68.   OSD positive covenant/restriction

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the applicant must create a positive covenant and restriction on the use of land under Section 88E of the Conveyancing Act 1919, burdening the owner with the requirement to maintain the on-site stormwater detention facilities on the lot.

 

The terms of the instruments are to be generally in accordance with the Council's "draft terms of Section 88B instrument for protection of on-site detention facilities" and to the satisfaction of Council (refer to appendices of Ku-ring-gai Council Water Management DCP 47). For existing titles, the positive covenant and the restriction on the use of land is to be created through an application to the Land Titles Office in the form of a request using forms 13PC and 13RPA. The relative location of the on-site detention facility, in relation to the building footprint, must be shown on a scale sketch, attached as an annexure to the request forms.

 

Registered title documents, showing the covenants and restrictions, must be submitted and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate.

 

Reason:      To protect the environment.

 

69.   Sydney Water Section 73 Compliance Certificate

 

Prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate the Section 73 Sydney water Compliance Certificate must be obtained and submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority

 

Reason:      Statutory requirement.

 

 

 

70.   Reinstatement of redundant crossings and completion of infrastructure works

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority must be satisfied that he or she has received a signed inspection form from Council which states that the following works in the road reserve have been completed:

 

·       new concrete driveway crossing in accordance with levels and specifications issued by Council

·       removal of all redundant driveway crossings and kerb laybacks (or sections thereof) and reinstatement of these areas to footpath, turfed verge and upright kerb and gutter (reinstatement works to match surrounding adjacent infrastructure with respect to integration of levels and materials)

·       full repair and resealing of any road surface damaged during construction

·       full replacement of damaged sections of grass verge to match existing

 

This inspection may not be carried out by the Private Certifier because restoration of Council property outside the boundary of the site is not a matter listed in Clause 161 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000.

 

All works must be completed in accordance with the General Specification for the Construction of Road and Drainage Works in Ku-ring-gai Council, dated November 2004. The Occupation Certificate must not be issued until all damaged public infrastructure caused as a result of construction works on the subject site (including damage caused by, but not limited to, delivery vehicles, waste collection, contractors, sub contractors, concrete vehicles) is fully repaired to the satisfaction of Council. Repair works shall be at no cost to Council.

 

Reason:      To protect the streetscape.

 

71.   Infrastructure repair

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority must be satisfied that any damaged public infrastructure caused as a result of construction works (including damage caused by, but not limited to, delivery vehicles, waste collection, contractors, sub contractors, concrete vehicles) is fully repaired to the satisfaction of Council Development Engineer and at no cost to Council.

 

Reason:      To protect public infrastructure.

 

72.   Mechanical ventilation

 

Prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that all mechanical ventilation systems are installed in accordance with Part F4.5 of the Building Code of Australia and comply with Australian Standards AS1668.2 and AS3666 Microbial Control of Air Handling and Water Systems of Building.

 

Reason:      To ensure adequate levels of health and amenity to the occupants of the building.

 

 

 

 

73.   Restriction on land title – seniors living development

 

Prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that restriction as to use of land under Section 88E of the Conveyancing Act 1919, has been created restricting the occupation of the premises to:

 

·      people 55 or over or people who have a disability

·      people who live with people 55 or over or people who have a disability

·      staff employed to assist in the administration of and provision of services to housing provided in this development

 

Reason:  To ensure that the development meets the provisions of the Seniors Living SEPP.

 

74.   Construction Standards - Housing for Seniors or People with a Disability.

 

Prior to the issue of an occupation certificate or occupation of the development (what ever comes first), certification shall be provided from an accredited access consultant to the certifying authority which demonstrates that the fit out and construction of the development satisfies the design criteria of SEPP (Housing for Seniors or People with a Disability) 2004.

 

Reason:   To ensure compliance with SEPP (Housing for Seniors or People with a Disability) 2004.

 

74a  Pedestrian and vehicular safety requirements - RMS

 

All pedestrian crossings on the subject site are to be clearly sign posted and marked on the road to ensure safety for pedestrians.

 

Vegetation and proposed landscaping/fencing must not hinder sight lines to and from the proposed access driveways to motorists, pedestrians and cyclists.

 

The layout of the proposed car parking areas associated with the subject development (including, driveways, grades, turn paths, sight distance requirements, aisle widths, aisle lengths, and parking bay dimensions) are to be in accordance with AS 2890.1- 2004 and AS 2890.2 - 2002.

 

Reason:  To ensure requirements of RMS are satisfied.

 

Conditions to be satisfied at all times:

 

75.   SEPP Seniors Living Advertising

 

All advertising, signage, marketing or promotion of the sale of the dwellings in this development shall make clear reference to the fact that this is a SEPP Seniors Living development and that at least one occupier shall be aged 55 years or over or have a disability.

 

Reason:    To ensure that the development meets the provisions of the Seniors Living SEP

 

76.   Noise control – plant and machinery

 

All noise generating equipment associated with any proposed mechanical ventilation system/s shall be located and/or soundproofed so the equipment is not audible within a habitable room in any other residential premises before 7am and after 10pm Monday to Friday and before 8am and after 10pm Saturday, Sunday and public holidays.  The operation of the unit outside these restricted hours shall emit a noise level of not greater than 5dbA above the background when measured at the nearest boundary.

 

Reason:      To protect the amenity of surrounding residents.

 

77.   Car parking

 

At all times, the visitor car parking spaces are to be clearly identified and are to be for the exclusive use of visitors to the site. On site permanent car parking spaces are not to be used by those other than an occupant or tenant of the subject building. Any occupant, tenant, lessee or registered proprietor of the development site or part thereof shall not enter into an agreement to lease, license or transfer ownership of any car parking spaces to those other than an occupant, tenant or lessee of the building.  These requirements are to be enforced through the following:

 

·       restrictive covenant placed on title pursuant to Section 88B of the Conveyancing Act, 1919

·       restriction on use under Section 68 of the Strata Schemes (Leasehold Development) Act, 1986 to all lots comprising in part or whole car parking spaces

 

Reason:      To ensure adequate provision of visitor parking spaces.

 

78.     Servicing of Waste Bins

 

On the night prior to the waste bins being serviced by Council, the occupiers of each unit are place to the waste receptacles out the front of each unit for servicing. Where the resident is unable to undertake this, it is the responsibility of the sites owner or body corporate to undertake this.

 

Reason: To ensure the amenity of the development.

 

79.   Outdoor lighting

 

At all times for the life of the approved development, all outdoor lighting shall not detrimentally impact upon the amenity of other premises and adjacent dwellings and shall comply with, where relevant, AS/NZ1158.3: 1999 Pedestrian Area (Category P) Lighting and AS4282: 1997 Control of the Obtrusive Effects of Outdoor Lighting.

 

Reason:  To protect the amenity of surrounding properties.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

 

 

 

375

Community Energy Efficiency Program

 

File: S02679

Vide: GB.9

 

 

To seek Council’s endorsement to submit a grant application to the Commonwealth Government, under the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP), for energy efficiency measures as part of the building and office refurbishment of 828 Pacific Highway, Gordon.

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Anderson/Fornari-Orsmond)

 

That Council endorses a grant application submission to the Commonwealth Government, under the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP), for energy efficiency measures as part of the building and office refurbishment of 828 Pacific Highway, Gordon.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

376

Creation of a Temporary Easement/Licence on Council's Community Land at St Ives

 

File: S04988

Vide: GB.11

 

 

For Council to consider a request for the installation of temporary rock anchors into Council-owned land at 210 Mona Vale Road, St Ives, being Lot 12 DP29167.

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Anderson/Berlioz)

 

A.     That Council approve the easement/licence for the installation of temporary rock anchors into council owned land at 210 Mona Vale Road, St Ives, being Lot 12 DP29167.

 

B.     That Council accept the compensation amount as determined by the valuation and the applicant is to be responsible for all costs associated with the creation and registration of the easement/licence.

 

C.     That Council authorise the Mayor and General Manager to execute all associated documentation for the creation and registration of the easement/licence.

 

D.     That Council authorise the affixing of the Common Seal to the documentation associated with the creation and registration of the easement/licence.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

 

377

Creation of an Easement for Drainage Purposes over Council Land, Lot 7 DP16246, Edenborough Road, Lindfield

 

File: DA0580/09

Vide: GB.12

 

 

To seek approval to create an easement for drainage purposes over Council land described as Lot 7 DP16246, Edenborough Road, Lindfield (Edenborough Park).

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Anderson/Armstrong)

 

A.     That Council approve the creation of an easement over Lot 7 DP16246, Edenborough Road, Lindfield, benefiting Lot 4 DP438604 and Lot B DP418739.

 

B.     That Council request the applicant to submit an amended easement plan, Section 88B Instrument and Administration Sheet.

 

C.     That Council accept the compensation amount and the applicant to be responsible for all costs associated with the creation and registration of the easement.

 

D.     That Council authorise the Mayor and General Manager to execute all associated documentation for the creation and registration of the easement.

 

E.     That Council authorise the affixing of the Common Seal to the documentation associated with the creation and registration of the easement.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

378

Tender T67/2012 - Road and Footpath Sweeping Contract

 

File: S09498/2

Vide: GB.13

 

 

To consider the tenders received for the supply of road and footpath cleaning service contract and appoint the preferred tenderer.

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Anderson/Pettett)

 

A.     That Council accepts the tender from Specialised Pavement Services Pty Ltd to carry out the road and footpath cleaning contract for seven (7) years with a three (3) year option to extend.

 

B.     That the Mayor and General Manager be delegated authority to execute all tender documents on Council’s behalf in relation to the Contract.

 

C.     That the Seal of Council be affixed to all necessary Contract documents.

 

D.     That all tenderers be advised of Council’s decision in accordance with Clause 178 of the Local Government Tendering Regulations.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

379

Tender T65/2012 - Princes Street Neighbourhood Centre Upgrade Works

 

File: S09415

Vide: GB.14

 

 

To consider the tenders received for Princes Street Neighbourhood Centre Upgrade, Turramurra.

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Ossip/Fornari-Orsmond)

 

A.    That Council decline to accept any of the tender submissions for T65/2012 Princes Street Neighbourhood Centre Upgrade Works on the basis all tenders received are above Council’s funds for the project.

 

B.    That Council approve the work to be broken into separate components with contractors, to be appointed, utilising quotations already received for the relocation of Telstra cables and pits, and relocation of underground electricity cables.

 

C.    That the remaining works be re-tendered through an open tender process following completion of the utility relocation works.

 

D.    That all tenderers be advised of Council’s decision in accordance with Clause 178 of the Local Government Tendering Regulations.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

380

Open Space Acquisition - Roseville

 

File: S04601

Vide: C.1

 

 

In accordance with the Local Government Act 1993 and the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005, in the opinion of the General Manager, the following business is of a kind as referred to in section 10A(2)(c), of the Act, and should be dealt with in a part of the meeting closed to the public.

 

Section 10A(2)(c) of the Act permits the meeting to be closed to the public in respect of information that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business.

 

The matter is classified confidential because it deals with the proposed acquisition and/or disposal of property.

 

It is not in the public interest to release this information as it would prejudice Council’s ability to acquire and/or dispose of the property on appropriate terms and conditions.

 

Report by Acting Director Strategy and Environment (Deborah Silva) dated 3 December 2012

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Anderson/Armstrong)

 

That Council proceed in the manner recommended in the report.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

381

General Manager's Performance Agreement

 

File: CY00254/4

Vide: C.3

 

 

In accordance with the Local Government Act 1993 and the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005, in the opinion of the General Manager, the following business is of a kind as referred to in section 10A(2)(a), of the Act, and should be dealt with in a part of the meeting closed to the public.

 

Section 10A(2)(a) of the Act permits the meeting to be closed to the public for business relating to personnel matters concerning particular individuals (other than Councillors).

 

Confidential Mayoral Minute by the Mayor, Councillor Elaine Malicki dated 4 December 2012

 

 

Resolved:

 

Moved: Councillors Ossip/Armstrong

 

A.     That Council receive and accept the Committee’s report.

 

B.     That the General Manager and his staff be commended for their good work.

 

C.     That the Mayor and General Manager sign and date the Performance Agreement as official record of the monitoring period for the 2012/2013 year, with one copy of the document held in the Mayor’s file and the other copy given to the General Manager.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

Standing Orders were suspended to deal with items

where there are speakers after a

Motion was moved by Councillors Berlioz and Anderson was

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

 

382

5 -15 Boundary Street Roseville - Supplementary Report

 

File: DA0053/12

Vide: GB.5

 

 

The following members of the public addressed Council:

 

L Priddle

G Boston

 

 

To determine Development Application DA0053/12, proposing demolition of existing dwellings and construction of two residential flat buildings containing 53 units, basement parking, landscaping and associated works at 5 -15 Boundary Street, Roseville.

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Ossip/Anderson)

 

A.       That the Council, as the consent authority, is of the opinion that the proposal includes works of a permanent character on land reserved for the purposes of widening of existing county roads and in accordance with Clause 13(2) of the KPSO, but the Council, as the responsible authority is not of the opinion that the purpose for which the land is reserved cannot be carried into effect within a reasonable time after the appointed day, 1 October 1971.

 

AND

 

B.       That the Council, as the consent authority, refuse to grant development consent to DA0053/12 for the demolition of existing dwellings and construction of 2 residential flat buildings containing 53 units, basement parking, landscaping and associated works at 5 – 15 Boundary Street, Roseville for the following reasons:

 

PROHIBITED DEVELOPMENT

 

The development is prohibited by Clause 13(1) of the KSPO.

 

Particulars

 

(a)     The proposal seeks consent to carry out works of a permanent character on land reserved for the purposes of widening of existing country roads. The proposal includes landscaping works and retaining structures upon 5, 7, 9, 11 and
15 Boundary Street where the land is reserved for road widening.

(b)     Clause 13(1) of the KPSO prohibits works of a permanent character on an area so reserved, subject to Clause 13(2).

(c)     Clause 13(2) provides that such works may be carried out where it appears to the responsible authority that the purpose for which the land is reserved cannot be carried into effect within a reasonable time after the appointed day.

(d)     The appointed day is 1 October 1971.

(e)     Lot 19 within DP 1143956 is not a public road. Lot 19 within DP 1143956 was not compulsorily acquired for the purposes of the Roads Act 1993.

(f)      A relevant opinion for the purposes of Clause 13(2) has not been formed.

(g)     Ku-ring-gai Council as consent authority is the responsible authority for the purposes of Clause 13(2).

(h)     An opinion that the purpose for which the reserved land cannot be carried into effect within a reasonable time of the appointed day is not formed for the following reasons:

 

·        The road reserve is for the purpose of “widening of existing county roads”

·        The RMS advice dated 4 September 2012 indicates it is currently developing a road widening project in Boundary Street, Roseville. The RMS has indicated construction will commence in March 2014.

·        In November 2012, the Roads and Maritime Authority released a community update brochure of the concept design for the road widening of Boundary Street seeking public comment.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

383

100 Eton Road, Lindfield - Construction of a 2 Storey Residential Flat Building containing 23 Units with Basement Car Parking and Associated Site Works and Landscaping

 

File: DA0270/12

Vide: GB.7

 

 

The following members of the public addressed Council:

 

D Robinson

P Wells

S Collins

 

 

Construction of a two storey residential flat building for 23 units with basement car parking and associated site works and landscaping.

 

 

 

Councillor Ossip withdrew during discussion

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Anderson/Pettett)

 

A.       THAT Council, as the consent authority, grant development consent to DA0270/12 for the construction of a two storey residential flat building containing 23 units, including ancillary site works, basement and landscaping on land at 100 Eton Road, Lindfield for a period of two (2) years from the date of the Notice of Determination, subject to the following conditions:

 

The conditions of consent are as follows:

 

1.     Approved architectural plans and documentation

 

The development must be carried out in accordance with the following plans and documentation listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, except where amended by other conditions of this consent:

 

Plan no.

Drawn by

Dated

P1_DA02.101[B]

Batessmart

5/9/12

P1_DA02.200[B]

Batessmart

5/9/12

P1_DA02.201[B]

Batessmart

5/9/12

P1_DA02.202[B]

Batessmart

5/9/12

P1_DA07.001[B]

Batessmart

5/9/12

P1_DA07.002[B]

Batessmart

5/9/12

P1_DA08.001[B]

Batessmart

5/9/12

P1_DA11.001[B]

Batessmart

5/9/12

P1_DA00.001[B]

Batessmart

5/9/12

P1A-DA-L-3

Turf Design

06-09-12

P1A-DA-L-5

Turf Design

06-09-12

P1A-DA-L-6

Turf Design

06-09-12

P1A-DA-L-7

Turf Design

06-09-12

P1A-DA-L-8

Turf Design

06-09-12

 

Document(s)

Dated

Colours and finishes schedule S11427

02 July 2012

Bush fire risk assessment and certification, prepared by Daniel Copland - Project No. 11GOSBUS-0152

5 September 2012

 

Reason:    To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination

 

2.     Inconsistency between documents

 

In the event of any inconsistency between conditions of this consent and the drawings/documents referred to above, the conditions of this consent prevail.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to demolition, excavation or construction:

 

3.     Road opening permit

 

The opening of any footway, roadway, road shoulder or any part of the road reserve shall not be carried out without a road opening permit being obtained from Council (upon payment of the required fee) beforehand.

 

Reason:       Statutory requirement (Roads Act 1993 Section 138) and to maintain the integrity of Council’s infrastructure.

 

4.     Notice of commencement

 

At least 48 hours prior to the commencement of any development (including demolition, excavation, shoring or underpinning works), a notice of commencement of building or subdivision work form and appointment of the principal certifying authority form shall be submitted to Council.

 

Reason:    Statutory requirement.

 

5.     Notification of builder’s details

 

Prior to the commencement of any development or excavation works, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be notified in writing of the name and contractor licence number of the owner/builder intending to carry out the approved works.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

6.     Dilapidation survey and report (public infrastructure)

 

Prior to the commencement of any development or excavation works on site, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a dilapidation report on the visible and structural condition of all structures of the following public infrastructure, has been completed and submitted to Council:

 

Public infrastructure

 

·          Grosvenor Road, Austral Avenue, Eton Road (Austral Avenue to site entrance).

·          Road 1 from Eton Road to Road 2.

·          Road 2 from Road 1 to the Precinct 1A site access point.

 

The report must be completed by a consulting structural/civil engineer. Particular attention must be paid to accurately recording (both written and photographic) existing damaged areas on the aforementioned infrastructure so that Council is fully informed when assessing any damage to public infrastructure caused as a result of the development.

 

The developer may be held liable to any recent damage to public infrastructure in the vicinity of the site, where such damage is not accurately recorded by the requirements of this condition prior to the commencement of works.

 

Note:              A written acknowledgment from Council must be obtained (attesting to this condition being appropriately satisfied) and submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the commencement of any excavation works.

 

Reason:         To record the structural condition of public infrastructure before works commence.

 

7.     Dilapidation survey and report (private property)

 

Prior to the commencement of any demolition or excavation works on site, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a dilapidation report on the visible and structural condition of all structures upon the following lands, has been completed and submitted to Council:

 

Address

 

·          Screen Australia - 101 Eton Road

 

The dilapidation report must include a photographic survey of adjoining properties detailing their physical condition, both internally and externally, including such items as walls ceilings, roof and structural members. The report must be completed by a consulting structural/geotechnical engineer as determined necessary by that professional based on the excavations for the proposal and the recommendations of the submitted geotechnical report.

 

In the event that access for undertaking the dilapidation survey is denied by a property owner, the applicant must demonstrate in writing to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority that all reasonable steps have been taken to obtain access and advise the affected property owner of the reason for the survey and that these steps have failed.

 

Note:              A copy of the dilapidation report is to be provided to Council prior to any excavation works been undertaken. The dilapidation report is for record keeping purposes only and may be used by an applicant or affected property owner to assist in any civil action required to resolve any dispute over damage to adjoining properties arising from works.

 

Reason:         To record the structural condition of likely affected properties before works commence.

 

8.     Construction and traffic management plan

 

The applicant must submit to Council a Construction Traffic Management Plan (CTMP), which is to be approved prior to the commencement of any works on site.

 

The plan is to consist of a report with Traffic Control Plans attached.

 

The report is to contain commitments which must be followed by the demolition and excavation contractor, builder, owner and subcontractors.  The CTMP applies to all persons associated with demolition, excavation and construction of the development.

 

The report is to contain construction vehicle routes for approach and departure to and from all directions.

 

The report is to contain a site plan showing entry and exit points.  Swept paths are to be shown on the site plan showing access and egress for an 11 metre long heavy rigid vehicle.

 

The Traffic Control Plans are to be prepared by a qualified person (red card holder).  One must be provided for each of the following stages of the works:

 

o    Excavation

o    Concrete pour

 

Traffic controllers must be in place at the site entry and exit points to control heavy vehicle movements in order to maintain the safety of pedestrians and other road users. 

 

When a satisfactory CTMP is received, a letter of approval will be issued with conditions attached.  Traffic management at the site must comply with the approved CTMP as well as any conditions in the letter issued by Council.  Council’s Rangers will be patrolling the site regularly and fines may be issued for any non-compliance with this condition.

 

Reason:         To ensure that appropriate measures have been considered during all phases of the construction process in a manner that maintains the environmental amenity and ensures the ongoing safety and protection of people.

 

9.     Erosion and drainage management

 

Earthworks and/or demolition of any existing buildings shall not commence until an erosion and sediment control plan is submitted to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority.  The plan shall comply with the guidelines set out in the NSW Department of Housing manual "Managing Urban Stormwater: Soils and Construction" certificate. Erosion and sediment control works shall be implemented in accordance with the erosion and sediment control plan.

 

Reason:         To preserve and enhance the natural environment.

 

10.   Tree protection fencing/ground protection

 

To preserve the following tree/s, no work shall commence until the area beneath their canopy is fenced off or ground protection installed as per following Tree Management Plans to prevent any activities, storage or the disposal of materials within the fenced area.  The fencing/ground protection shall be maintained intact until the completion of all demolition/building work on site.

 

Plan no.

Drawn by

Date

TMP01 Sheets 1- 2

Naturally Trees

6/09/12

 

The tree protection fencing shall be constructed of galvanised pipe at 2.4 metre spacing’s and connected by securely attached chain mesh fencing to a minimum height of 1.8 metres in height prior to work commencing. Ground protection shall be in accordance with AS4970-2009 Protection of trees on development sites.

 

Reason : To protect existing trees during construction phase

 

11.   Tree fencing inspection

 

Upon installation of the required tree protection measures, an inspection of the site by the Principal Certifying Authority is required to verify that tree protection measures comply with all relevant conditions.

 

Reason:    To protect existing trees during the construction phase.

 

12.   Construction waste management plan

 

Prior to the commencement of any works, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a waste management plan, prepared by a suitably qualified person, has been prepared in accordance with Council’s DCP 40 – Construction and Demolition Waste Management.

 

The plan shall address all issues identified in DCP 40, including but not limited to: the estimated volume of waste and method for disposal for the construction and operation phases of the development.

 

Note:               The plan shall be provided to the Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:          To ensure appropriate management of construction waste.

 

13.   Noise and vibration management plan

 

Prior to the commencement of any works, a noise and vibration management plan is to be prepared by a suitably qualified expert addressing the likely noise and vibration from demolition, excavation and construction of the proposed development and provided to the Principal Certifying Authority.  The management plan is to identify amelioration measures to achieve the best practice objectives of AS 2436-2010 and NSW Department of Environment and Climate Change Interim Construction Noise Guidelines. The report shall be prepared in consultation with any geotechnical report that itemises equipment to be used for excavation works.

 

The management plan shall address, but not be limited to, the following matters:

 

·      identification of the specific activities that will be carried out and associated noise sources

·      identification of all potentially affected sensitive receivers, including residences, churches, commercial premises, schools and properties containing noise sensitive equipment

·      the construction noise objective specified in the conditions of this consent

·      the construction vibration criteria specified in the conditions of this consent

·      determination of appropriate noise and vibration objectives for each identified sensitive receiver

·      noise and vibration monitoring, reporting and response procedures

·      assessment of potential noise and vibration from the proposed demolition, excavation and construction activities, including noise from construction vehicles and any traffic diversions

·      description of specific mitigation treatments, management methods and procedures that will be implemented to control noise and vibration during construction

·      construction timetabling to minimise noise impacts including time and duration restrictions, respite periods and frequency

·      procedures for notifying residents of construction activities that are likely to affect their amenity through noise and vibration

·      contingency plans to be implemented in the event of non-compliances and/or noise complaints

 

Reason:      To protect the amenity afforded to surrounding residents during the construction process.

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of the construction certificate:

 

 

14.   Amendments to approved landscape plans

 

Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the approved landscape plans, listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, have been amended in accordance with the requirements of this condition as well as other conditions of this consent:

 

Plan no.

Drawn by

Date

P1A_DA-L-3/B

Turf Design

6/09/12

 

The following changes are required to the Landscape Plan:

 

1.   The proposed plant species to the raised planters and building surrounds are to be amended to be in accordance with the low screening shrubs and groundcovers shown on the Landscape Sections, Turf Design, P1A_DA-L-7/B and P1A_DA-L-8/B, 6/09/12 and in accordance with the letter from the bush fire consultant, Eco Logical, dated 16 October 2012.

 

2.   The proposed planting of Tristaniopsis laurina are to be substituted with a species representative of the dry sandstone ridgetop vegetation such as Elaeocarpus reticulatus or similar.

 

3.   Landscape plans to include levels of proposed drainage pits.

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the landscape plan has been amended as required by this condition.

 

Note:              An amended plan, prepared by a landscape architect or qualified landscape designer shall be submitted to the Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:       To ensure adequate landscaping of the site

 

15.   Amendments to approved engineering plans

 

Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the approved engineering plan(s), listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, have been amended in accordance with the requirements of this condition as well as other conditions of this consent:

 

Plan no.

Drawn by

Dated

20 0127501C SK05 P4

Bonacci Group

11.07.12

 

The above engineering plan(s) shall be amended as follows:

 

1.     An alternative failsafe overflow such as a high-level overflow is to be provided for the detention system, to prevent surcharging into the barbecue area through the grate at RL66.50.

 

2.     Section 1 is to be developed to reflect the actual proposed ground levels at the pit lids and the correct orifice plate and discharge control pit configuration.

 

The above amendments are required to ensure compliance with Ku-ring-gai Water Management Development Control Plan 47 and the approved landscape plan.

 

Note:              An amended engineering plan, prepared by a qualified engineer shall be submitted to the Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

16.   Long service levy

 

In accordance with Section 109F(i) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act a Construction Certificate shall not be issued until any long service levy payable under Section 34 of the Building and Construction Industry Long Service Payments Act 1986 (or where such levy is payable by instalments, the first instalment of the levy) has been paid. Council is authorised to accept payment. Where payment has been made elsewhere, proof of payment is to be provided to Council.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

17.   Builder’s indemnity insurance

 

The applicant, builder, developer or person who does the work on this development, must arrange builder’s indemnity insurance and submit the certificate of insurance in accordance with the requirements of Part 6 of the Home Building Act 1989 to the Certifying Authority for endorsement of the plans accompanying the Construction Certificate.

 

It is the responsibility of the applicant, builder or developer to arrange the builder's indemnity insurance for residential building work over the value of $20,000. The builder's indemnity insurance does not apply to commercial or industrial building work or to residential work valued at less than $20,000, nor to work undertaken by persons holding an owner/builder's permit issued by the Department of Fair Trading (unless the owner/builder's property is sold within 7 years of the commencement of the work).

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

18.   External service pipes and the like prohibited

 

Proposed water pipes, waste pipes, stack work, duct work, mechanical ventilation plant and the like must be located within the building.  Details confirming compliance with this condition must be shown on construction certificate plans and detailed with construction certificate specifications.  Required external vents or vent pipes on the roof or above the eaves must be shown on construction certificate plans and detailed with construction certificate specifications.  External vents or roof vent pipes must not be visible from any place unless detailed upon development consent plans.  Where there is any proposal to fit external service pipes or the like this must be detailed in an amended development (S96) application and submitted to Council for determination.

 

Vent pipes required by Sydney Water must not be placed on the front elevation of the building or front roof elevation.  The applicant, owner and builder must protect the appearance of the building from the public place and the appearance of the streetscape by elimination of all external services excluding vent pipes required by Sydney Water and those detailed upon development consent plans.

 

Reason:         To protect the streetscape and the integrity of the approved development.

 

19.   Access for people with disabilities (residential)

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that access for people with disabilities to and from and between the public domain, residential units and all common open space areas is provided. Consideration must be given to the means of dignified and equitable access.

 

Compliant access provisions for people with disabilities shall be clearly shown on the  plans submitted with the Construction Certificate.  All details shall be provided to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate. All details shall be prepared in consideration of the Disability Discrimination Act, and the relevant provisions of AS1428.1, AS1428.2, AS1428.4 and AS 1735.12.

 

Reason:           To ensure the provision of equitable and dignified access for all people in accordance with disability discrimination legislation and relevant Australian Standards.

 

20.   Adaptable units

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the nominated adaptable units within the development application, G.02, G.08 & 1.08 are designed as adaptable housing in accordance with the provisions of Australian Standard AS4299-1995: Adaptable Housing.

 

Note:              Evidence from an appropriately qualified professional demonstrating compliance with this control is to be submitted to and approved by the Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate.

 

Reason:    Disabled access & amenity.

 

21.   Stormwater management plan

 

Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, the applicant must submit, for approval by the Principal Certifying Authority, scale construction plans and specifications in relation to the stormwater management and disposal system for the development. The plan(s) must be in accordance with Bonacci Group Drawings 20 0127501C SK05 P4 and SK07 P3 and must also include the following detail:

 

·      the required basement stormwater pump-out system is to cater for subsoil drainage and driveway runoff in the event that the grated drain becomes blocked or its capacity is exceeded. (refer appendix 7.1.1 of Development Control Plan 47 for design)

 

Reason:    To protect the environment.

 

22.   Excavation for services

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that no proposed underground services (ie: water, sewerage, drainage, gas or other service) unless previously approved by conditions of consent, are located beneath the canopy of any tree protected under Council’s Tree Preservation Order, located on the subject allotment and adjoining allotments.

 

Note:              A plan detailing the routes of these services and trees protected under the Tree Preservation Order shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:         To ensure the protection of trees.

 

23.   Basement car parking details

 

Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, certified parking layout plan(s) to scale showing all aspects of the vehicle access and accommodation arrangements must be submitted to and approved by the Certifying Authority. A qualified civil/traffic engineer must review the proposed vehicle access and accommodation layout and provide written certification on the plans that:

 

·          all parking space dimensions, driveway and aisle widths, driveway grades, transitions, circulation ramps, blind aisle situations and other trafficked areas comply with Australian Standard 2890.1 – 2004 “Off-street car parking”

·          a clear height clearance of 2.6 metres (required under DCP40 for waste collection trucks) is provided over the designated garbage collection truck manoeuvring areas within the basement

·          no doors or gates are provided in the access driveways to the basement carpark which would prevent unrestricted access for internal garbage collection at any time from the basement garbage storage and collection area

·          the vehicle access and accommodation arrangements are to be constructed and marked in accordance with the certified plans

 

Reason:         To ensure that parking spaces are in accordance with the approved development.

 

24.   Vehicular access and garaging

 

Driveways and vehicular access ramps must be designed not to scrape the underside of cars. In all respects, the proposed vehicle access and accommodation arrangements must be designed and constructed to comply with Australian Standard 2890.1 – 2004 “Off-Street car parking”. Details are to be provided to and approved by the Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate.

 

Reason:         To ensure that parking spaces are in accordance with the approved development.

 

25.   Car parking allocation

 

Car parking required for the development shall be allocated in the following way:

 

Resident car spaces

32

Visitor spaces

6

Total spaces

38

 

Each adaptable dwelling must be provided with car parking complying with the dimensional and location requirements of AS2890.1 – parking spaces for people with disabilities.

 

At least one visitor space shall also comply with the dimensional and location requirements of AS2890.1 – parking spaces for people with disabilities.

 

Consideration must be given to the means of access from disabled car parking spaces to other areas within the building and to footpath and roads and shall be clearly shown on the plans submitted with the Construction Certificate.

 

Reason:         To ensure equity of access and appropriate facilities are available for people with disabilities in accordance with federal legislation.

 

26.   Number of bicycle spaces

 

The basement car park shall be adapted to provide 8 bicycle spaces in accordance with DCP 55. The bicycle parking spaces shall be designed in accordance with AS2890.3. Details shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the Certifying Authority prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate.

 

Reason:         To provide alternative modes of transport to and from the site.

 

27.   Utility provider requirements

 

Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, the applicant must make contact with all relevant utility providers whose services will be impacted upon by the development. A written copy of the requirements of each provider, as determined necessary by the Certifying Authority, must be obtained.  All utility services or appropriate conduits for the same must be provided by the developer in accordance with the specifications of the utility providers.

 

Reason:         To ensure compliance with the requirements of relevant utility providers.

 

28.   Underground services

 

All electrical services (existing and proposed) shall be undergrounded from the proposed building on the site to the appropriate power pole(s) or other connection point. Undergrounding of services must not disturb the root system of existing trees and shall be undertaken in accordance with the requirements of the relevant service provided. Documentary evidence that the relevant service provider has been consulted and that their requirements have been met are to be provided to the Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate. All electrical and telephone services to the subject property must be placed underground and any redundant poles are to be removed at the expense of the applicant.

 

Reason:         To provide infrastructure that facilitates the future improvement of the streetscape by relocation of overhead lines below ground.

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of the construction certificate or prior to demolition, excavation or construction (whichever comes first):

 

29.   Infrastructure restorations fee

 

To ensure that damage to Council Property as a result of construction activity is rectified in a timely matter:

 

a)      All work or activity taken in furtherance of the development the subject of this approval must be undertaken in a manner to avoid damage to Council Property and must not jeopardise the safety of any person using or occupying the adjacent public areas.

 

b)      The applicant, builder, developer or any person acting in reliance on this approval shall be responsible for making good any damage to Council Property, and for the removal from Council Property of any waste bin, building materials, sediment, silt, or any other material or article.

 

c)      The Infrastructure Restoration Fee must be paid to the Council by the applicant prior to both the issue of the Construction Certificate and the commencement of any earthworks or construction.

 

d)      In consideration of payment of the Infrastructure Restorations Fee, Council will undertake such inspections of Council Property as Council considers necessary and also undertake, on behalf of the applicant, such restoration work to Council Property, if any, that Council considers necessary as a consequence of the development. The provision of such restoration work by the Council does not absolve any person of the responsibilities contained in (a) to (b) above. Restoration work to be undertaken by the Council referred to in this condition is limited to work that can be undertaken by Council at a cost of not more than the Infrastructure Restorations Fee payable pursuant to this condition.

 

e)      In this condition:

 

“Council Property” includes any road, footway, footpath paving, kerbing, guttering, crossings, street furniture, seats, letter bins, trees, shrubs, lawns, mounds, bushland, and similar structures or features on any road or public road within the meaning of the Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) or any public place; and

 

“Infrastructure Restoration Fee” means the Infrastructure Restorations Fee calculated in accordance with the Schedule of Fees & Charges adopted by Council as at the date of payment and the cost of any inspections required by the Council of Council Property associated with this condition.

 

Reason:    To maintain public infrastructure.

 

 

 

30.   Bush fire risk certification

 

Bush fire protection measures shall be carried out in accordance with the following bush fire risk assessment, report and certificate, listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, except where amended by other conditions of this consent:

 

Document title

Prepared by

Dated

Bushfire Protection Assessment 11GOSBUS-0152

Ecological Australia

5 September 2012

 

Prior to the issue of the construction certificate, the principal certifying authority must be satisfied that the construction certificate is in accordance with the recommendations of the report and certificate as listed above.

 

Reason:    To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

Conditions to be satisfied during the demolition, excavation and construction phases:

 

31.   Prescribed conditions

 

The applicant shall comply with any relevant prescribed conditions of development consent under clause 98 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation. For the purposes of section 80A (11) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, the following conditions are prescribed in relation to a development consent for development that involves any building work:

 

·       The work must be carried out in accordance with the requirements of the Building Code of Australia

·       In the case of residential building work for which the Home Building Act 1989 requires there to be a contract of insurance in force in accordance with Part 6 of that Act, that such a contract of insurance is in force before any works commence.

 

Reason:      Statutory requirement.

 

32.     Hours of work

 

Demolition, excavation, construction work and deliveries of building material and equipment must not take place outside the hours of 7.00am to 5.00pm Monday to Friday and 8.00am to 12 noon Saturday. No work and no deliveries are to take place on Sundays and public holidays.

 

Excavation or removal of any materials using machinery of any kind, including compressors and jack hammers, must be limited to between 7.30am and 5.00pm Monday to Friday, with a respite break of 45 minutes between 12 noon 1.00pm.

 

Where it is necessary for works to occur outside of these hours (ie) placement of concrete for large floor areas on large residential/commercial developments or where building processes require the use of oversized trucks and/or cranes that are restricted by the RTA from travelling during daylight hours to deliver, erect or remove machinery, tower cranes, pre-cast panels, beams, tanks or service equipment to or from the site, approval for such activities will be subject to the issue of an "outside of hours works permit" from Council as well as notification of the surrounding properties likely to be affected by the proposed works.

 

Note:            Failure to obtain a permit to work outside of the approved hours will result in on the spot fines being issued.

 

Reason:        To ensure reasonable standards of amenity for occupants of neighbouring properties.

 

33.   Temporary irrigation

 

Temporary irrigation within the Tree Protection Fencing is to be provided.  Irrigation volumes are to be determined by the Project Arborist.

 

Reason:  To protect trees to be retained on site.

 

34.   Demolition of existing site structures

 

To preserve the health and condition of existing trees to be retained,  all demolition of existing building and landscape structures including tree removal, are to be undertaken within the access restricted to the existing roads and parking areas and in accordance with Section 2, Appendix 6 and Appendix 7, Arboricultural Impact Appraisal and Method Statement, Naturally Trees, 6/09/12. Where vehicular access is required across existing soft landscape area, temporary ground protection capable of supporting the vehicles is to be constructed in accordance with Section 4.5.3, AS4970-2009 Protection of trees on development sites.

 

Reason:       To protect trees to be retained on site.

 

35.   Approved plans to be on site

 

A copy of all approved and certified plans, specifications and documents incorporating conditions of consent and certification (including the Construction Certificate if required for the work) shall be kept on site at all times during the demolition, excavation and construction phases and must be readily available to any officer of Council or the Principal Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

36.   Construction noise

 

During excavation, demolition and construction phases, noise generated from the site shall be controlled in accordance with the recommendations of the approved noise and vibration management plan.

 

Reason:         To ensure reasonable standards of amenity to neighbouring properties.

 

37.   Site notice

 

A site notice shall be erected on the site prior to any work commencing and shall be displayed throughout the works period.

 

The site notice must:

 

·      be prominently displayed at the boundaries of the site for the purposes of informing the public that unauthorised entry to the site is not permitted

·      display project details including, but not limited to the details of the builder, Principal Certifying Authority and structural engineer

·      be durable and weatherproof

·      display the approved hours of work, the name of the site/project manager, the responsible managing company (if any), its address and 24 hour contact phone number for any inquiries, including construction/noise complaint are to be displayed on the site notice

·      be mounted at eye level on the perimeter hoardings/fencing and is to state that unauthorised entry to the site is not permitted

 

Reason:         To ensure public safety and public information.

 

38.   Dust control

 

During excavation, demolition and construction, adequate measures shall be taken to prevent dust from affecting the amenity of the neighbourhood. The following measures must be adopted:

 

·      physical barriers shall be erected at right angles to the prevailing wind direction or shall be placed around or over dust sources to prevent wind or activity from generating dust

·      earthworks and scheduling activities shall be managed to coincide with the next stage of development to minimise the amount of time the site is left cut or exposed

·      all materials shall be stored or stockpiled at the best locations

·      the ground surface should be dampened slightly to prevent dust from becoming airborne but should not be wet to the extent that run-off occurs

·      all vehicles carrying spoil or rubble to or from the site shall at all times be covered to prevent the escape of dust

·      all equipment wheels shall be washed before exiting the site using manual or automated sprayers and drive-through washing bays

·      gates shall be closed between vehicle movements and shall be fitted with shade cloth

·      cleaning of footpaths and roadways shall be carried out daily

 

Reason:         To protect the environment and amenity of surrounding properties.

 

39.   Post-construction dilapidation report

 

The applicant shall engage a suitably qualified person to prepare a post construction dilapidation report at the completion of the construction works. This report is to ascertain whether the construction works created any structural damage to adjoining buildings, infrastructure and roads. The report is to be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority. In ascertaining whether adverse structural damage has occurred to adjoining buildings, infrastructure and roads, the Principal Certifying Authority must:

 

·      compare the post-construction dilapidation report with the pre-construction dilapidation report

·      have written confirmation from the relevant authority that there is no adverse structural damage to their infrastructure and roads.

 

A copy of this report is to be forwarded to Council at the completion of the construction works.

 

Reason:         Management of records.

 

40.   Further geotechnical input

 

The geotechnical and hydro-geological works implementation, inspection, testing and monitoring program for the excavation and construction works must be in accordance with the report by Douglas Partners. Over the course of the works, a qualified geotechnical/hydro-geological engineer must complete the following:

 

·      further geotechnical investigations and testing recommended in the above report(s) and as determined necessary

·      further monitoring and inspection at the hold points recommended in the above report(s) and as determined necessary

·      written report(s) including certification(s) of the geotechnical inspection, testing and monitoring programs

 

Reason:         To ensure the safety and protection of property.

 

41.   Compliance with submitted geotechnical report

 

A contractor with specialist excavation experience must undertake the excavations for the development and a suitably qualified and consulting geotechnical engineer must oversee excavation.

 

Geotechnical aspects of the development work, namely:

 

·      appropriate excavation method and vibration control

·      support and retention of excavated faces

·      hydro-geological considerations

 

must be undertaken in accordance with the recommendations of the geotechnical report prepared by Douglas Partners. Approval must be obtained from all affected property owners, including Ku-ring-gai Council, where rock anchors (both temporary and permanent) are proposed below adjoining property(ies).

 

Consultation should be held with Screen Australia regarding any specific vibration tolerances for their specialised equipment, as recommended in the geotechnical report.

 

Reason:         To ensure the safety and protection of property.

 

42.   Use of road or footpath

 

During excavation, demolition and construction phases, no building materials, plant or the like are to be stored on the road or footpath without written approval being obtained from Council beforehand.  The pathway shall be kept in a clean, tidy and safe condition during building operations.  Council reserves the right, without notice, to rectify any such breach and to charge the cost against the applicant/owner/builder, as the case may be.

 

Reason:         To ensure safety and amenity of the area.

 

43.   Guarding excavations

 

All excavation, demolition and construction works shall be properly guarded and protected with hoardings or fencing to prevent them from being dangerous to life and property.

 

Reason:         To ensure public safety.

 

44.   Toilet facilities

 

During excavation, demolition and construction phases, toilet facilities are to be provided, on the work site, at the rate of one toilet for every 20 persons or part of 20 persons employed at the site.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

45.   Recycling of building material

 

During demolition and construction, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that building materials suitable for recycling have been forwarded to an appropriate registered business dealing in recycling of materials. Materials to be recycled must be kept in good order.

 

Reason:         To facilitate recycling of materials.

 

Reason:         To ensure the ongoing safety and protection of property.

 

46.   Road reserve safety

 

All public footways and roadways fronting and adjacent to the site must be maintained in a safe condition at all times during the course of the development works. Construction materials must not be stored in the road reserve. A safe pedestrian circulation route and a pavement/route free of trip hazards must be maintained at all times on or adjacent to any public access ways fronting the construction site.  Where public infrastructure is damaged, repair works must be carried out when and as directed by Council officers. Where pedestrian circulation is diverted on to the roadway or verge areas, clear directional signage and protective barricades must be installed in accordance with AS1742-3 (1996) “Traffic Control Devices for Work on Roads”. If pedestrian circulation is not satisfactorily maintained across the site frontage, and action is not taken promptly to rectify the defects, Council may undertake proceedings to stop work.

 

Reason:         To ensure safe public footways and roadways during construction.

 

 

 

47.   Services

 

Where required, the adjustment or inclusion of any new utility service facilities must be carried out by the applicant and in accordance with the requirements of the relevant utility authority. These works shall be at no cost to Council. It is the applicants’ full responsibility to make contact with the relevant utility authorities to ascertain the impacts of the proposal upon utility services (including water, phone, gas and the like). Council accepts no responsibility for any matter arising from its approval to this application involving any influence upon utility services provided by another authority.

 

Reason:         Provision of utility services.

 

48.   Sydney Water Section 73 Compliance Certificate

 

The applicant must obtain a Section 73 Compliance Certificate under the Sydney Water Act 1994. An application must be made through an authorised Water Servicing
Co-ordinator. The applicant is to refer to “Your Business” section of Sydney Water’s web site at www.sydneywater.com.au then the “e-develop” icon or telephone 13 20 92. Following application a “Notice of Requirements” will detail water and sewer extensions to be built and charges to be paid. Please make early contact with the
Co-ordinator, since building of water/sewer extensions can be time consuming and may impact on other services and building, driveway or landscape design.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

49.   Arborist’s report

 

The trees to be retained shall be inspected, monitored and treated by a Project Arborist who must be a qualified (AQF) Level 5 arborist in accordance with AS4970-2009 Protection of trees on development sites.  Regular inspections and documentation from the Project Arborist to the Principal Certifying Authority are required including at the following times or phases of work. All monitoring shall be recorded and provided to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to completion of the works.  

 

Schedule

Tree/location

Time of inspection

As shown on Tree Management Plans, TMP01 Sheets 1- 2, prepared by Naturally Trees and dated 6/09/12

As per Programme of arboricultural imput,  Appendix 7, Arboricultural Impact Appraisal and Method Statement, Naturally Trees, 6/09/12.  

 

Reason:         To ensure protection of existing trees.

 

50.   Canopy/root pruning

 

Canopy and/or root pruning of the following tree(s) which is necessary to accommodate the approved building works shall be undertaken by an experienced AQF level 3 Arborist under the supervision of the Project Arborist and in accordance with the reduction pruning clause of AS4373-2007. All other branches are to be tied back and protected during construction, under the supervision of a qualified arborist.

 

Schedule

Tree/location

Tree works

 

Tree117/Corymbia maculata (Spotted Gum) located within the road verge of Road 1

 

Minor canopy pruning for building

 

Tree119/Eucalyptus botryoides (Bangalay) located within the road verge of Road 1

 

Minor root pruning for basement

 

Tree135/Eucalyptus pilularis (Blackbutt) located on eastern boundary, within the adjoining property

 

Minor canopy pruning for building

 

Tree185/Eucalyptus haemastoma (Scribbly Gum) located within the road verge of Road 4B

Minor canopy pruning for building

 

 

Reason:         To protect the environment.

 

51.   Treatment of tree roots

 

If tree roots are required to be severed for the purposes of constructing the approved works, they shall be cut cleanly by hand, by an experienced Arborist/Horticulturist with a minimum qualification of Horticulture Certificate or Tree Surgery Certificate.  All pruning works shall be undertaken as specified in Australian Standard 4373-2007 – Pruning of Amenity Trees.

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees.

 

52.   Hand excavation

 

All excavation except for basement and driveways within the specified radius of the trunk(s) of the following tree(s) shall be hand dug under the supervision of the Project Arborist.

 

Schedule

Tree/location

Radius

Tree117/Corymbia maculata (Spotted Gum) located within the road verge of Road 1

 

12m

Tree119/Eucalyptus botryoides (Bangalay) located within the road verge of Road 1

 

10m

Tree135/Eucalyptus pilularis (Blackbutt) located on eastern boundary, within the adjoining property

 

14m

Tree185/Eucalyptus haemastoma (Scribbly Gum) located within the road verge of Road 4B

7m

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees.

 

53.   No storage of materials beneath trees

 

No activities, storage or disposal of materials shall take place beneath the canopy of any tree protected under Council's Tree Preservation Order at any time.

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees.

 

54.   Removal of refuse

 

All builders' refuse, spoil and/or material unsuitable for use in landscape areas shall be removed from the site on completion of the building works.

 

Reason:         To protect the environment.

 

55.   Canopy replenishment trees to be planted

 

All trees to be planted shall be maintained in a healthy and vigorous condition until they attain a height of 5.0 metres whereafter will be protected by Council’s Tree Preservation Order.  Any of the trees found faulty, damaged, dying or dead shall be replaced with the same species

 

Reason:    To maintain the treed character of the area.

 

56.   Survey and inspection of waste collection clearance and path of travel

 

At the stage when formwork for the ground floor slab is in place and prior to concrete being poured, a registered surveyor is to:

 

·      ascertain the reduced level of the underside of the slab at the driveway entry,

·      certify that the level is not lower than the level shown on the approved DA plans; and

·      certify that the minimum headroom of 2.6 metres will be available for the full path of travel of the small waste collection vehicle from the street to the collection area.

·      This certification is to be provided to Council’s Development Engineer prior to any concrete being poured for the ground floor slab.

·      No work is to proceed until Council has undertaken an inspection to determine clearance and path of travel.

 

At the stage when formwork for the ground floor slab is in place and prior to concrete being poured, Council’s Development Engineer and Manager Waste Services are to carry out an inspection of the site to confirm the clearance available for the full path of travel of the small waste collection vehicle from the street to the collection area.  This inspection may not be carried out by a private certifier because waste management is not a matter listed in Clause 161 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000.

 

Reason:       To ensure access will be available for Council’s contractors to collect waste from the collection point.

 

57.   On site retention of waste dockets

 

All demolition, excavation and construction waste dockets are to be retained on site, or at suitable location, in order to confirm which facility received materials generated from the site for recycling or disposal.

 

·      Each docket is to be an official receipt from a facility authorised to accept the material type, for disposal or processing.

·      This information is to be made available at the request of an Authorised Officer of Council.

 

Reason:       To protect the environment.

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate:

 

58.   Construction of roads and stormwater infrastructure

 

Prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that Roads 2, 4A and 4B and stormwater pipework for Precinct 1 associated with DA0677/11 have been completed and that the subject development is connected to this infrastructure.

 

Reason:         To provide for legal and physical vehicular access and stormwater disposal.

 

59.   Easement for waste collection

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, an easement for waste collection is to be created under Section 88B of the Conveyancing Act 1919. This is to permit legal access for Council, Council’s contractors and their vehicles over the subject property for the purpose of collecting waste from the property.  The terms of the easement are to be generally in accordance with Council’s draft terms for an easement for waste collection and shall be to the satisfaction of Council’s Development Engineer.

 

Reason:         To permit legal access for Council, Council’s contractors and their vehicles over the subject site for waste collection.

 

60.     Maintenance of water quality measures

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the applicant must create a positive covenant and restriction on the use of land under Section 88E of the Conveyancing Act 1919, burdening the owner with the requirement to maintain the water quality measures (Stormfilter cartridges) on the lot.

 

For existing titles, the positive covenant and the restriction on the use of land is to be created through an application to the Land Titles Office in the form of a request using forms 13PC and 13RPA. The relative location of the cartridges, in relation to the building footprint, must be shown on a scale sketch, attached as an annexure to the request forms.

 

Registered title documents, showing the covenants and restrictions, must be submitted and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate.

 

Reason:         To protect the environment.

 

 

 

 

61.   Compliance with BASIX Certificate

 

Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that all commitments listed in BASIX Certificate No. 432458M_04 have been complied with.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

62.   Clotheslines and clothes dryers

 

Prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the units either have access to an external clothes line located in common open space or have a mechanical clothes dryer installed.

 

Reason:         To provide access to clothes drying facilities.

 

63.   Mechanical ventilation

 

Following completion, installation and testing of all the mechanical ventilation systems, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied of the following prior to the issue of any Occupation Certificate:

 

1.     The installation and performance of the mechanical systems complies with:

 

·       The Building Code of Australia

·       Australian Standard AS1668

·       Australian Standard AS3666 where applicable

 

2.     The mechanical ventilation system in isolation and in association with other mechanical ventilation equipment, when in operation will not be audible within a habitable room in any other residential premises adjoining the development site before 7am and after 10pm Monday to Friday and before 8am and after 10pm Saturday, Sunday and public holidays. The operation of the unit(s) outside these restricted hours shall emit a noise level of not greater than 5dbA above the background when measured at the nearest adjoining boundary.

 

Note:              Written confirmation from an acoustic engineer that the development achieves the above requirements is to be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate.

 

Reason:         To protect the amenity of surrounding properties.

 

64.   Completion of landscape works

 

Prior to the release of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that all landscape works, including the removal of all noxious and/or environmental weed species, have been undertaken in accordance with the approved plan(s) and conditions of consent.

 

Reason:          To ensure that the landscape works are consistent with the development consent.

 

65.   Completion of tree works

 

Prior to the release of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that all tree works, including pruning in accordance with AS4373-2007 or remediation works in accordance with AS4370-2009, have been undertaken in accordance with the approved plan(s) and conditions of consent.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the tree works are consistent with the development consent.

 

66.   Accessibility

 

Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that:

 

·      the lift design and associated functions are compliant with AS 1735.12 & AS 1428.2

·      the level and direction of travel, both in lifts and lift lobbies, is audible and visible

·      the controls for lifts are accessible to all persons and control buttons and lettering are raised

·      international symbols have been used with specifications relating to signs, symbols and size of lettering complying with AS 1428.2

·      the height of lettering on signage is in accordance with AS 1428.1 – 1993

·      the signs and other information indicating access and services incorporate tactile communication methods in addition to the visual methods

 

Reason:         Disabled access & services.

 

67.   Retention and re-use positive covenant

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the applicant must create a positive covenant and restriction on the use of land under Section 88E of the Conveyancing Act 1919, burdening the property with the requirement to maintain the site stormwater retention and re-use facilities on the property.

 

The terms of the instruments are to be generally in accordance with the Council's "draft terms of Section 88B instruments for protection of retention and re-use facilities" and to the satisfaction of Council (refer to appendices of Ku-ring-gai Water Management Development Control Plan No. 47). For existing titles, the positive covenant and the restriction on the use of land is to be created through an application to the Land Titles Office in the form of a request using forms 13PC and 13RPA. The relative location of the reuse and retention facility, in relation to the building footprint, must be shown on a scale sketch, attached as an annexure to the request forms.

 

Registered title documents showing the covenants and restrictions must be submitted to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate.

 

Reason:         To protect the environment.

 

 

 

68.   Provision of copy of OSD designs if Council is not the PCA

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the following must be provided to Council’s Development Engineer:

 

·      a copy of the approved Construction Certificate stormwater detention/retention design for the site

·      a copy of any works-as-executed drawings required by this consent

·      the Engineer’s certification of the as-built system.

 

Reason:         For Council to maintain its database of as-constructed on-site stormwater detention systems.

 

69.   Certification of drainage works

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that:

 

·      the stormwater drainage works have been satisfactorily completed in accordance with the approved Construction Certificate drainage plans

·      the minimum retention and on-site detention storage volume requirements of BASIX and Ku-ring-gai Water Management Development Control Plan No. 47 respectively, have been achieved

·      retained water is connected and available for use

·      basement and subsoil areas are able to drain via a pump/sump system installed in accordance with AS3500.3 and Appendix 7.1.1 of Ku-ring-gai Water Management Development Control Plan No. 47

·      all grates potentially accessible by children are secured

·      components of the new drainage system have been installed by a licensed plumbing contractor in accordance with the Plumbing and Drainage Code AS3500.3 2003 and the Building Code of Australia

·      all enclosed floor areas, including habitable and garage floor levels, are safeguarded from outside stormwater runoff ingress by suitable differences in finished levels, gradings and provision of stormwater collection devices

 

The rainwater certification sheet contained in Appendix 13 of the Ku-ring-gai Water Management Development Control Plan No. 47, must be completed and attached to the certification. Where an on-site detention system has been constructed, the on-site detention certification sheet contained in Appendix 4 of DCP 47 must also be completed and attached to the certification.

 

Note:              Evidence from a qualified and experienced consulting civil/hydraulic engineer documenting compliance with the above is to be provided to Council prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate.

 

Reason:         To protect the environment.

 

 

 

 

 

70.     WAE plans for stormwater management and disposal (dual occupancy and above)

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, a registered surveyor must provide a works as executed survey of the completed stormwater drainage and management systems. The survey must be submitted to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate. The survey must indicate:

 

·      as built (reduced) surface and invert levels for all drainage pits

·      gradients of drainage lines, materials and dimensions

·      as built (reduced) level(s) at the approved point of discharge to the public drainage system

·      as built location and internal dimensions of all detention and retention structures on the property (in plan view) and horizontal distances to nearest adjacent boundaries and structures on site

·      the achieved storage volumes of the installed retention and detention storages and derivative calculations

·      as built locations of all access pits and grates in the detention and retention system(s), including dimensions

·      the size of the orifice or control fitted to any on-site detention system

·      dimensions of the discharge control pit and access grates

·      the maximum depth of storage possible over the outlet control

·      top water levels of storage areas and indicative RL’s through the overland flow path in the event of blockage of the on-site detention system

 

The works as executed plan(s) must show the as built details above in comparison to those shown on the drainage plans approved with the Construction Certificate prior to commencement of works. All relevant levels and details indicated must be marked in red on a copy of the Principal Certifying Authority stamped construction certificate stormwater plans.

 

Reason:         To protect the environment.

 

71.   Basement pump-out maintenance

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a maintenance regime has been prepared for the basement stormwater pump-out system.

 

Note:              A maintenance regime specifying that the system is to be regularly inspected and checked by qualified practitioners is to be prepared by a suitable qualified professional and provided to the Principal Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:         To protect the environment.

 

72.   Sydney Water Section 73 Compliance Certificate

 

Prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate the Section 73 Sydney water Compliance Certificate must be obtained and submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority

 

Reason:      Statutory requirement.

 

73.   Infrastructure repair

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority must be satisfied that any damaged public infrastructure caused as a result of construction works (including damage caused by, but not limited to, delivery vehicles, waste collection, contractors, sub contractors, concrete vehicles) is fully repaired to the satisfaction of Council Development Engineer and at no cost to Council.

 

Reason:         To protect public infrastructure.

 

74.   Fire safety certificate

 

Prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a Fire Safety Certificate for all the essential fire or other safety measures forming part of this consent has been completed and provided to Council.

 

Note:              A copy of the Fire Safety Certificate must be submitted to Council.

 

Reason:         To ensure suitable fire safety measures are in place.

 

Conditions to be satisfied at all times:

 

Reason:      To protect the amenity of surrounding properties.

 

75.   Car parking

 

At all times, the visitor car parking spaces are to be clearly identified and are to be for the exclusive use of visitors to the site. On site permanent car parking spaces are not to be used by those other than an occupant or tenant of the subject building. Any occupant, tenant, lessee or registered proprietor of the development site or part thereof shall not enter into an agreement to lease, license or transfer ownership of any car parking spaces to those other than an occupant, tenant or lessee of the building. 

 

The use of Visitor’s Spaces and Tenant Spaces are to be protected and are to be enforced through the following:

 

·          restrictive covenant placed on title pursuant to Section 88B of the Conveyancing Act, 1919

·          restriction on use under Section 39 of the Strata Schemes (Freehold Development) Act, 1973  to all lots comprising in part or whole car parking spaces

 

Reason:         To ensure car parking is available for residents and their visitor’s.

 

76.   Concept approval

 

All works associated with the development and its ongoing use shall have regard to, and be undertaken in accordance with the Conditions and supporting documentation of Concept Approval MP06_0130.

 

Reason:   To ensure compliance with the Concept Approval.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY by those present

 

 

Councillor Ossip returned

 

 

384

Councillor Representation on KOPWA Board

 

File: S03086

Vide: GB.1

 

 

To provide Councillors information in relation to its Councillor nomination to KOPWA (formerly Ku-ring-gai Old People's Welfare Association).

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Anderson/Fornari-Orsmond)

 

That Council receive and note the report.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

 

385

Investment Report as at 30 November 2012

 

File: S05273

Vide: GB.2

 

 

To present to Council investments portfolio performance for November 2012.

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Ossip/Berlioz)

 

A.    That the summary of investments and performance for November 2012 be received and noted.

 

B.    That the Certificate of the Responsible Accounting Officer be noted and the report adopted.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

386

Ku-ring-gai Bicycle Plan

 

File: S02777

Vide: GB.8

 

 

To consider the submissions from the public exhibition of the draft Ku-ring-gai Bicycle Plan.

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Fornari-Orsmond/Citer)

 

A.     That the Ku-ring-gai Bicycle Plan be adopted, to guide the provision of cycling facilities and to support a culture of cycling in Ku-ring-gai.

 

B.     That the Ku-ring-gai Bicycle Plan be used as a tool to lobby for regional and state cycling improvements and funding opportunities.

 

C.     That persons who made a submission during the exhibition be notified of Council’s decision.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

387

Easement at 6 - 8A Drovers Way, Lindfield

 

File: DA0085/12

Vide: GB.10

 

 

To consider a request in relation to the extinguishment of the existing easement and creation of a new easement at 6 - 8A Drovers Way, Lindfield, benefiting Council for drainage purposes.

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Anderson/Armstrong)

 

A.     That the General Manager is delegated to negotiate Council’s requirements including compensation for the extinguishment of the existing easement and creation of the new easement at 6 – 8A Drovers Way Lindfield.

 

B.     Subject to the General Manager completing negotiations that Council grant approval for the extinguishment of the existing easement and creation of the new easement at 6 – 8A Drovers Way, Lindfield.

 

C.     That authority is given to the General Manager and the Mayor to affix the Common Seal of the Council to the Instrument for the release of the easement and creation of the new easement any other relevant documents.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

388

Draft Pymble Business Park Development Control Plan- Exhibition

 

File: S09007

Vide: GB.15

 

 

To have Council consider the Draft Pymble Business Park Development Control Plan for public exhibition.

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Fornari-Orsmond/Berlioz)

 

A.     That Council adopt the Draft Development Control Plan - Pymble Business Park for exhibition.

 

B.     That the Draft Development Control Plan - Pymble Business Park be exhibited in accordance with the requirements of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979 and Regulations.

 

C.     A report is brought back to Council at the conclusion of the exhibition period.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE

 

 

389

Request for a Pedestrian Bridge over Pacific Highway at Lindfield

 

File: S09064

Vide: QN.1

 

 

Question Without Notice from Councillor Jennifer Anderson

 

I refer to a recent Community Ideas Forum held in Lindfield at which residents called for a pedestrian bridge over the Pacific Highway at Lindfield, noting that Council is currently preparing a Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan, and ask, bearing in mind the NSW State Government's recent announcement of a new commuter car park on the Woodford Lane Car Park on the western side of the Highway, that is, on the opposite side of the Highway to the rail station, whether Council officers will review the potential need for a pedestrian overbridge in the event of imminent construction of the commuter car park?

 

Answer by Director Strategy and Environment

 

I am happy to raise that matter with Transport for NSW in our discussions, if Councillors are OK with that.

 

 

 

 

Inspections Committee – SETTING OF TIME, DATE AND RENDEZVOUS

 

 

An Inspections Committee will take place to view the following property:

 

28 Wolseley Road, Lindfield

 

The Director Development and Regulation, Michael Miocic, advised Council that there were 3 dates that the inspection could take place and that they are 15 and 22 December 2012 and 19 January 2013 but would seek consensus by sending to the Councillors suggested dates and times for the Inspections Committee to be held.

 

 

 

Council resolved itself into Closed Meeting

with the Press and Public Excluded to deal with the following item

after a Motion moved by Councillors Anderson and Fornari-Orsmond

was CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

 

390

Rembrandt Notes 2006 - 2 "SURF" CPDO

 

File: S05597

Vide: C.2

 

 

In accordance with the Local Government Act 1993 and the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005, in the opinion of the General Manager, the following business is of a kind as referred to in section 10A(2)(g), of the Act, and should be dealt with in a part of the meeting closed to the public.

 

Section 10A(2)(g) of the Act permits the meeting to be closed to the public for business relating to advice concerning litigation, or advice that would otherwise be privileged from production in legal proceedings on the ground of legal professional privilege.

 

This matter is classified confidential under section 10A(2)(g) because it contains advice concerning a legal matter that:

 

(a)   is a substantial issue relating to a matter in which the Council is involved

(b)   is clearly identified in the advice, and

(c)   is fully discussed in that advice.

 

It is not in the public interest to release details of the legal advice as it would prejudice Council’s position in court proceedings.

 

Report by the General Manager dated 3 December 2012

 

 

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Anderson/Fornari-Orsmond)

 

That Council proceed in accordance with Option A.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

The General Manager adverted to the consideration of the matter referred to in the Minute numbered 390, and to the resolution contained in such Minute.

 

 

 

 

The Meeting closed at 8.20pm

 

 

The Minutes of the Ordinary Meeting of Council held on 11 December 2012 (Pages 1 - 77) were confirmed as a full and accurate record of proceedings on 5 February 2013

 

 

 

 

 

          __________________________                                 __________________________

                   General Manager                                                         Mayor / Chairperson

 

 

 


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 5 February 2013

MM.1 / 73

 

 

Item MM.1

S09408

 

23 January 2013

 

 

Mayoral Minute

 

 

Council to host Emergency Services Forums during 2013

 

Ku-ring-gai is surrounded by bushland which is one of its greatest assets.  However, with hundreds of houses along the bushland interface, the LGA is mainly at risk from bushfire and storm hazards and these risks need to be managed.

 

Notable events in the past involving wind storms and bushfires include:

 

·      On the afternoon of 21 January 1991, a devastating wind storm swept across the northern suburbs of Sydney. Mature blue gums trees were uprooted and foliage stripped.

·      In January 1994, Ku-ring-gai was severely affected by several of the fires which ringed Sydney and several homes were destroyed and areas of bushland burnt.

·      In December 2001, a wind storm swept across the northern suburbs of Sydney, affecting trees and impacting power lines, access and transport.

·      In January 2002, bushfires swept through the Lane Cove River State recreation area, skirting South Turramurra and Pymble. 

 

The extent of these hazards are usually characterised by the scope of their impact being community-wide, with medium to long-term effects.  Because they do not occur very often there is frequently a lack of social preparedness, and in some cases complacency may have set in.

 

Following discussions with members of the RFS and SES I would like to propose that Council host a series of local meetings in conjunction with the Emergency Services where discussions can be held on a range of emergency issues.  These include preparedness for storms and bushfires, as well as preparation of evacuation plans, agency contacts in emergencies, information alerts and kits.

 

There should be at least one meeting in the north and one in the south of the Council area, with more if needed.

 

Recommendation:

 

That Council hold Emergency Services Forums in conjunction with the Emergency Services.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Elaine Malicki

Mayor

 

 

 

  


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 5 February 2013

MM.2 / 74

 

 

Item MM.2

FY00430/4

 

29 January 2013

 

 

Mayoral Minute

 

 

Financial Assistance Program -

Economic and Social Development Initiatives

 

 

For over 10 years Council has provided approximately $90,000 per year to community and cultural groups through the Financial Assistance Program. Last year this amount was significantly increased to $168,000 through a partnership that was developed between Council and the Turramurra Community Bank.

 

The current funding categories the Financial Assistance Program are Community Development Grants, Arts and Cultural Grants, and Small Equipment Grants.

 

Participant feedback from the recent Economic and Social Development Committee meeting, held in December 2012, proposed Council provide seed funding to assist the business sector in the engagement of the community in economic and social development initiatives, for example, small festivals and special events at our village centres and shopping malls.

 

It is therefore proposed that Council include an additional category in the Financial Assistance Program titled Economic and Social Development Grants, that will enable community or business groups to apply for funding to develop small events or festivals, or other projects that will encourage community engagement in economic and social development initiatives throughout
Ku-ring-gai.

 

This proposal has been discussed with our partners in the Financial Assistance Program, the Turramurra Community Bank, who are supportive of it.

 

Recommendation:

 

That Council’s Financial Assistance Program categories and guidelines be amended to incorporate a category for Economic and Social Development Initiatives Grants.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Elaine Malicki

Mayor

 

 

 

   


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 5 February 2013

GB.1 / 75

 

 

Item GB.1

S02235

 

4 January 2013

 

 

Local Government and Shires Association (LGSA) - 2013 Tourism Conference

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

purpose of report:

To advise Council of the Local Government and Shires Association (LGSA) 2013 Tourism Conference.

 

 

background:

The 2013 LGSA Tourism Conference will be held at Shoal Bay from 11–13 March and will be hosted by Port Stephens Council.

 

 

comments:

The theme of this year’s conference is “Leadership and Innovation”.  The program also includes site visits, workshops, key notes, panel discussions and creative networking opportunities.

 

 

recommendation:

That any Councillors interested in attending the 2013 LGSA Tourism Conference at Shoal Bay advise the General Manager by Friday, 8 February 2013.

 

 

 


  

Purpose of Report

 

To advise Council of the Local Government and Shires Association (LGSA) 2013 Tourism Conference.

 

Background

 

This is an annual conference held by the LGSA especially to support local government initiatives in tourism.   The 2013 LGSA Tourism Conference will be held at Shoal Bay from 11–13 March.  This year’s host will be Port Stephens Council.

 

Comments

 

The theme of this year’s conference is “Leadership and Innovation”.  The program includes site visits, workshops, key notes, panel discussions and creative networking opportunities. 

 

The conference will cover local government case studies, site visits to successful tourism projects and it will enable councillors to share information with other elected members, tourism professionals and staff from Destination NSW and the Tourism Industry Council. 

 

The organisers indicate that the conference will be relevant to Mayors, Councillors, General Managers and anyone working in or with local government whose role involves: tourism promotion and development, economic development, marketing, special events, media, community strategic planning, town planning, cultural services and infrastructure provision.

 

The conference invitation, brochure and draft program is at Attachment A1.

 

Governance Matters

 

The Policy on Payment of Expenses and Provision of Facilities to Councillors applies in this case.  Council shall meet expenses incurred by Councillors attending conferences, seminars and training when authorised by resolution of Council.

 

Risk Management

 

Not applicable.

 

Financial Considerations

 

The registration fee for the 2013 Conference is $693.00 per delegate.  Travel and accommodation costs will be additional.

 

Social Considerations

 

Not applicable.

 

 

 

 

Environmental Considerations

 

Not applicable.

 

Community Consultation

 

Not applicable.

 

Internal Consultation

 

Not applicable.

 

Summary

 

The 2013 LGSA Tourism Conference will be held at Shoal Bay from 11–13 March and will be hosted by Port Stephens Council.  The theme of this year’s conference is “Leadership and Innovation”.  The program also includes site visits, workshops, key notes, panel discussions and creative networking opportunities.  The registration fee for the 2013 Conference is $693.00 per delegate plus additional travel and accommodation costs.  The Policy on Payment of Expenses and Provision of Facilities to Councillors applies in this case.  Council shall meet expenses incurred by Councillors attending conferences, seminars and training when authorised by resolution of Council.  The conference invitation, brochure and draft program is at Attachment A1.

 

Recommendation:

 

That any Councillors interested in attending the 2013 LGSA Tourism Conference at Shoal Bay advise the General Manager by Friday, 8 February 2013.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Don Sutherland

Manager Economic and Social Development

 

 

 

 

John McKee

General Manager

 

 

Attachments:

A1View

Conference Invitation, Draft Program and Registration details

 

2013/014191

  


APPENDIX No: 1 - Conference Invitation, Draft Program and Registration details

 

Item No: GB.1

 

PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 5 February 2013

GB.2 / 87

 

 

Item GB.2

FY00275/5

 

21 January 2013

 

 

Request for Sponsorship -

Ku-ring-gai Philharmonic Orchestra

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

purpose of report:

To advise Council of a sponsorship request from the Ku-ring-gai Philharmonic Orchestra (KPO).

 

 

background:

Ku-ring-gai Council helped to establish the Ku-ring-gai Philharmonic Orchestra in 1971 and has supported it through the Financial Assistance to Community Groups program. In 2008 Council decided to sponsor the orchestra, which provided a more structured approach and agreed upon mutual benefits.

 

 

comments:

The KPO has requested $25,000 in sponsorship to support its activities including symphony concerts, musical education in local child care centres and pre-schools, free community concerts, a school competition and choral concert. The KPO also would like to purchase acoustic shields to protect their players from hearing loss.

 

 

recommendation:

That Council provide sponsorship of $20,000 to the Ku-ring-gai Philharmonic Orchestra.

 

 

 


  

Purpose of Report

 

To advise Council of a sponsorship request from the Ku-ring-gai Philharmonic Orchestra (KPO).

 

Background

 

With a pool of more than 150 musicians, the Ku-ring-gai Philharmonic is a full-scale community orchestra, which consistently receives high critical acclaim for its performances.

 

Ku-ring-gai Council helped to establish the KPO in 1971 and has supported it through the Financial Assistance to Community Groups program.

 

In 2008 Council decided to sponsor the orchestra, which provided a more structured approach and agreed upon mutual benefits.

 

Over the past four years of the sponsorship arrangement, Council has received significant benefits including the logo featuring on all promotional material and opportunities to have banners displayed at all KPO concerts.

 

Comments

 

The KPO has requested $25,000 for sponsorship the 2013 year, to support its activities. These include symphony concerts, musical education in local child care centres and pre-schools, free community concerts, a school competition and choral concert. They also would like to purchase acoustic shields to protect their players from hearing loss. For more information see Attachment A1 – sponsorship proposal for more information.

 

Prior to 2012 Ku-ring-gai Council sponsored the KPO for $20,000 per year. To celebrate the orchestra’s 40th anniversary in 2012, Council increased the sponsorship to $25,000. The extra $5,000 was for the KPO to produce a 40th anniversary publication. While research was conducted into the publication, it has not yet been produced.  For more information see Attachment A2 – the sponsorship evaluation report.

 

Governance Matters

 

The sponsorship proposal complies with Council’s Sponsorship and Donations Policy.

 

Risk Management

 

If any of the activities conducted by the KPO are not well organised or professionally produced, Council could be associated with a reputational risk. However this is mitigated by the KPO having over 40 years experience of conducting successful events in the Ku-ring-gai community.

 

Financial Considerations

 

Council has $24,200 remaining in its sponsorship budget for the 2012/2013 financial year.

If Council sponsored the KPO for the full $25,000 requested, an extra $800 would need to be reallocated to the sponsorship budget and adjusted at the next budget quarterly review.

 

Additionally the sponsorship budget would be exhausted for the remainder of the 2012/13 financial year

 

Social Considerations

 

This sponsorship will allow the Ku-ring-gai Philharmonic Orchestra to continue to provide quality musical performances for the Ku-ring-gai community.

 

The orchestra works with many different community segments to grow and develop musical talent, from the very young through to seniors.

 

Environmental Considerations

 

Not applicable.

 

Community Consultation

 

Not applicable.

 

Internal Consultation

 

Not applicable.

 

Summary

 

The Ku-ring-gai Philharmonic Orchestra is seeking $25,000 in sponsorship for 2012/13. Prior to 2011/12, Council sponsored the KPO for $20,000 per year. Last year the KPO celebrated their 40th anniversary and received an extra $5,000 from Council to produce an anniversary publication, which is not yet complete.

 

Council has $24,200 remaining in the sponsorship budget for 2012/13. If Council were to sponsor the KPO for the full $25,000 requested, an extra $800 would need to be sourced for the sponsorship budget, and adjusted at the next budget quarterly review.

 

Additionally the sponsorship budget would be exhausted for the remainder of the 2012/13 financial year.

 

Recommendation:

 

That Council provide sponsorship for the Ku-ring-gai Philharmonic Orchestra for $20,000 in 2013.

 

 

 

Tiffiny Kellar

Manager Communications

 

Janice Bevan

Director Community

 

 

Attachments:

A1View

Ku-ring-gai Philharmonic Orchestra - sponsorship proposal 2013

 

2013/015451

 

A2View

Ku-ring-gai Philharmonic Orchestra - sponsorship evaluation report - 2012

 

2013/015453

  


APPENDIX No: 1 - Ku-ring-gai Philharmonic Orchestra - sponsorship proposal 2013

 

Item No: GB.2

 

 

 

 

Mr John McKee                                                                   16 January 2013

General Manager

Ku-ring-gai Council

818 Pacific Hwy

Gordon NSW 2073

 

Dear Mr McKee,

 

Re:          Ku-ring-gai Council sponsorship of

Ku-ring-gai Philharmonic Orchestra

 

I write to request renewal of the $25,000  sponsorship by Ku-ring-gai Council of

Ku-ring-gai Philharmonic Orchestra (KPO) for 2013.

 

In 2012 KPO celebrated 40 years of music making in the community. The extensive range of activities presented in this anniversary year could not have been planned or undertaken without the invaluable support of Council.  These are outlined in the enclosed/attached 2012 Sponsorship Evaluation Report.

 

Sponsorship for 2013 is sought to enable:

·    KPO to present high quality symphony concerts in Ku-ring-gai and promote ‘Destination Ku-ring-gai’

·    Kids Proms concerts themed ‘Animal Safari’ will be held on Sunday 19 May at St Ives High School. From March to May KPO musicians will go to a number of childcare centres and pre-schools, and we are talking with the Childrens Services Librarian at Gordon Library to give presentations about the music and demonstrations of instruments prior to the concerts as an education project. These concerts will also feature local composer Nigel Westlake’s Penguin Circus.

·    Community Concerts: four free chamber music concerts will be held in local retirement villages and church venues to provide accessible music for seniors and families.  Planning for the 2014 outdoor concert in Wahroonga Park, given logistics for outdoor performances are significant.

·    The NSW Secondary Schools Concerto Competition attracting talented young musicians from across the state will again be a feature for 2013. The resources and organisation required for Audition day, Semi-Finals recitals and the Finals Concert and the competition generally are large and complex.

 

 

·    In November KPO will partner with the Macquarie University Singers to present Carl Orff’s Carmina Burana.  The ambition to present a major choral program and promote singing in Ku-ring-gai has been longstanding. KPO will work with local choral groups to ensure maximum collaboration and participation.

·    Acoustic Shields for wind players.  Research by longstanding clarinettist Martin Brown into potential hearing loss from close exposure to brass instruments (copy of report attached) has led to a recommendation to purchase 6 acoustic shields at $300 each.  These would be used by players in both KPO and the Kuringai Youth Orchestra.

·    The next ‘behind the scenes’ organisational priority is to explore purchase and implementation of Tessitura database software developed specifically for cultural organisations.  We aim to progress research into potential application for KPO to use Tessitura in 2013.

 

KPO will seek to work with Council leveraging these events and projects to raise awareness and profile of both Ku-ring-gai Philharmonic Orchestra and the relationship between KPO and Ku-ring-gai Council across the Ku-ring-gai community. KPO welcomes Council’s assistance in this objective and opportunities to jointly achieve these aims.

 

Ku-ring-gai Philharmonic Orchestra’s activities and aims align closely with Council’s cultural policy objectives, contributing significantly to the Ku-ring-gai cultural landscape.  The orchestra works with many different community segments, from the very young right through to seniors, both independent and in retirement and care facilities.  The KPO continues to support and work closely with Kuringai Youth Orchestra to promote involvement by local youth in classical music.

 

Performance venues and rehearsal facilities are an ongoing challenge for KPO. We strive continuously to ensure a good working relationship with local schools, but find we are always ‘second fiddle’ ; performance dates can be cancelled despite agreements being in place. It is extremely difficult to plan in this way given the long-term commitments artists make and our planning processes. KPO continues to advocate the need for Council to implement a long term vision and plan for a quality 500 seat community performance space in Ku-ring-gai, to represent the rich cultural tapestry of our community and promote Ku-ring-gai as a cultural destination.

 

KPO is fortunate to have a very high quality Artistic Director in Ronald Prussing whose musicianship and connections in the music world brings great value to the orchestra and spreads the name of Ku-ring-gai not only across the state but also in the national music arena. Classical music identity and Ku-ring-gai resident Guy Noble has recently accepted the role of KPO Patron and spoke at the final concert for 2012.

 

KPO’s volunteer musicians are committed to providing high quality orchestral music and cultural engagement for a diverse range of demographics across Ku-ring-gai.

 

 

 

 

 

KPO has a long-term commitment to Ku-ring-gai’s cultural development and supports Council’s strategies to assist cultural activities in the area to grow and thrive. I trust Council will consider this submission favourably.

 

 

 

Yours sincerely,

 

 

 

 

 

 

Anne Cahill 

President

Ku-ring-gai Philharmonic Orchestra

Email: annecahill@optusnet.com.au

Tel: 02 9416 4199

Mob: 0412 797 223

 

Cc

Janice Bevan, Director Community

Tiffiny Kellar, Manager Communications

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


APPENDIX No: 2 - Ku-ring-gai Philharmonic Orchestra - sponsorship evaluation report - 2012

 

Item No: GB.2

 

Ku-ring-gai Council Sponsorship of Ku-ring-gai Philharmonic Orchestra

 

2012 Evaluation Report

 

2012 was Ku-ring-gai Philharmonic Orchestra’s 40th Anniversary year. 

 

Highlights of 2012 were:

 

·    Fortieth Anniversary Spectacular concert launched by the Premier & member for

          Ku-ring-gai Hon Barry O’Farrell and reception

·    Outdoor performance at Council’s Wahroonga Park Concert on 15th September, themed ‘Last Night at the Proms Ku-ring-gai Style’, enjoyed by an audience of over 3,000 local residents.  KPO would like to make this a biennial event and plan for a similar style performance in 2014.

·    NSW Secondary Schools Concerto Competition Finals Concert: always a highlight of the year support and profile for highly talented young musicians. Clr Rakesh Duncombe presented the Multiple Concerto section prize.

·    Presentation by Mayor Elaine Malicki to KPO players with Over 25 Years of Service at the final performance for 2012 in November.

·    KPO History Project: extensive research was carried out through 2012 and is ongoing.  Data about performances, performers, conductors, soloists and repertoire has been centrally collated.  Stories and snapshots with statistics worked into bite-sized profiles will be presented in printed programs throughout 2013 for eventual presentation as an e-book with a limited print run.

·    Re-branding project was carried out in 2012. The suite of new logos and visual presentation of online and print marketing collateral was a significant undertaking, aimed the raise the bar of KPO’s visual presentation, as reflected in the 2012 brochure and collateral.

·    Three new works were commissioned for performance during 2012 as 40th anniversary projects: a brass fanfare by John Peterson, given four performances; a cello concerto by Mark Isaacs Invocations for Cello & Orchestra was premiered at two performances in May with soloist Julian Smiles and a work for young audiences Life is But a Dream by Katy Abbott featured in Kids Proms concerts.

 

Ku-ring-gai Council’s logo and brand presence was featured in annual brochure, flyers & posters, concert programs, banners & on website; a Message from the Mayor was included in the Anniversary Spectacular Concert & Concerto Competition Finals Concert programs. The Mayor and Councillors were involved in activities throughout the year.  Council’s support was acknowledged in spoken addresses throughout 2012.

 

Sponsorship by Council to KPO is greatly valued.  Both organisations have strong alignment in supporting accessible cultural development in Ku-ring-gai for all ages and promoting

Ku-ring-gai as a destination for cultural activities.  Council’s sponsorship helps KPO to leverage additional support from other government agencies and local businesses.  KPO would not have been able to achieve both the ‘behind the scenes’ developments and high profile activities held during 2012 without Council’s support.  Thank you.

 


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 5 February 2013

GB.3 / 94

 

 

Item GB.3

CY00043/5

 

4 January 2013

 

 

2013 LGMA National Congress and

Business Expo - May 2013

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

purpose of report:

To advise Councillors of the 2013 Local Government Managers Australia (LGMA) National Congress and Business Expo to be held in Hobart, Tasmania between 19 and 21 May 2013.

 

 

background:

The LGMA hosts an annual National Congress and Business Expo. The 2013 Congress theme is Great Society: what is local government’s role?

Delegates will hear from speakers on what the future will hold for most local governments, review the existing indicators that measure the value of cities, explore the elements that make societies great and focus on what is local government’s role in the creation of a great society.

 

 

comments:

The Congress will provide a platform for Councillors to hear and discuss the issues facing many local governments in the future.

 

 

recommendation:

That any Councillors interested in attending the 2013 LGMA National Congress and Business Expo in Hobart advise the General Manager by Friday, 15 February 2013.

 

 

 


  

Purpose of Report

 

To advise Councillors of the 2013 Local Government Managers Australia (LGMA) National Congress and Business Expo to be held in Hobart, Tasmania between 19 and 21 May 2013. 

 

Background

 

The LGMA hosts an annual National Congress and Business Expo. The 2013 Congress theme is Great Society: what is local government’s role?

Delegates will hear from speakers on what the future will hold for most local governments, review the existing indicators that measure the value of cities, explore the elements that make societies great and focus on what is local government’s role in the creation of a great society.

 

Comments

 

The Congress will provide a platform for Councillors to hear and discuss the issues facing many local governments in the future.

 

Governance Matters

 

The Policy on Payment of Expenses and Provision of Facilities to Councillors provides for Council to meet the reasonable costs of Councillors attending conferences authorised by resolution of Council.

 

Risk Management

 

There are no risk management considerations associated with the recommendations in this report.

 

Financial Considerations

 

The cost of attending the Congress is $1475 for a LGMA member and $1775 for non-members. Airfares and accommodation costs will be additional.

 

Attendance is provided for in the Councillor’s conference budget in accordance with the Payment of Expenses and Provision of Facilities Policy.

 

Council has an annual budget of $33,000 for Councillor’s attendance at conferences with $18,066 remaining in the 2012/2013 financial year.

 

Social Considerations

 

There are no social considerations associated with the recommendations in this report.

 

Environmental Considerations

 

There are no environmental considerations associated with the recommendations in this report.

 

Community Consultation

 

None undertaken or required.

 

Internal Consultation

 

None undertaken or required.

 

Summary

 

To advise Councillors of the 2013 Local Government Managers Australia (LGMA) National Congress and Business Expo to be held in Hobart, Tasmania between 19 and 21 May 2013.

 

The LGMA hosts an annual National Congress and Business Expo. The 2013 Congress theme is Great Society: what is local government’s role?

Delegates will hear from speakers on what the future will hold for most local governments, review the existing indicators that measure the value of cities, explore the elements that make societies great and focus on what is local government’s role in the creation of a great society.

 

Recommendation:

 

That any Councillors interested in attending the 2013 LGMA National Congress and Business Expo in Hobart advise the General Manager by Friday, 15 February 2013.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Matt Ryan

Manager Records & Governance

 

 

 

 

John Giovinazzo

Acting Director Corporate

 

 

Attachments:

A1View

2013 LGMA National Congress and Business Expo - Hobart - 19 - 21/05/2013

 

2012/307397

  


APPENDIX No: 1 - 2013 LGMA National Congress and Business Expo - Hobart - 19 - 21/05/2013

 

Item No: GB.3

 




 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 5 February 2013

GB.4 / 100

 

 

Item GB.4

S08820

 

9 January 2013

 

 

Committee on Electoral Matters Inquiry into the 2012 Local Government Elections

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

purpose of report:

To consider the invitation from the Parliament of NSW Committee on Electoral Matters to make a submission to the Inquiry into the 2012 Local Government Elections.

 

 

background:

The 2012 Local Government Elections were held on Saturday, 8 September 2012. The Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters has been referred an Inquiry into the 2012 Local Government Elections. The Committee will examine matters relating to the cost of the elections, the experience of councils that conducted their own elections, and any issues arising from non-residential voting. The Committee will also consider possible legislative changes to improve the efficiency of the election processes, and remove any barriers to candidate participation. Complete terms of reference of the Committee have been included in the attachment.

 

 

comments:

The Committee has invited Council to make a submission addressing the specific terms of reference.

 

 

recommendation:

That Council consider whether to make a submission to the Committee, provide any comments for possible inclusion into the submission to the General Manager by Friday, 8 February 2013 and that a further report containing the draft submission be referred to the Ordinary Meeting of Council to be held on the 26 February 2013 for endorsement by Council before being referred to the Committee.

 

 

 


  

Purpose of Report

 

To consider the invitation from the Parliament of NSW Committee on Electoral Matters to make a submission to the Inquiry into the 2012 Local Government Elections.  

 

Background

 

The 2012 Local Government Elections were held on Saturday, 8 September 2012.

 

The Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters has been referred an Inquiry into the 2012 Local Government Elections. The Committee will examine matters relating to the cost of the elections, the experience of councils that conducted their own elections, and any issues arising from non-residential voting. The Committee will also consider possible legislative changes to improve the efficiency of the election processes, and remove any barriers to candidate participation. Complete terms of reference of the Committee have been included in the attachment (see Attachment A1).

 

Comments

 

The Committee has invited Council to make a submission addressing the specific terms of reference.

 

Governance Matters

 

Elections are to be administered by the General Manager of Council, or by the NSW Electoral Commissioner, in accordance with the provisions of Section 296 of the Local Government Act 1993.

 

Risk Management

 

There are no major risk management considerations associated with the recommendations in this report.

 

Financial Considerations

 

There are no financial management considerations associated with the recommendations in this report.

 

Social Considerations

 

There are no social management considerations associated with the recommendations in this report.

 

Environmental Considerations

 

There are no environmental management considerations associated with the recommendations in this report.

 

 

 

Community Consultation

 

None undertaken or required.

 

Internal Consultation

 

None undertaken or required.

 

Summary

 

The 2012 Local Government Elections were held on Saturday, 8 September 2012.

 

The Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters has been referred an Inquiry into the 2012 Local Government Elections. The Committee will examine matters relating to the cost of the elections, the experience of councils that conducted their own elections, and any issues arising from non-residential voting. The Committee will also consider possible legislative changes to improve the efficiency of the election processes, and remove any barriers to candidate participation. Complete terms of reference of the Committee have been included in the attachment.

 

The Committee has invited Council to make a submission addressing the specific terms of reference.

 

Recommendation:

 

A.       That Council consider whether to make a submission to the Committee.

B.       That Councillors provide any comments for possible inclusion into the submission to the General Manager by Friday, 8 February 2013.

C.       That a further report containing the draft submission be referred to the Ordinary Meeting of Council to be held on the 26 February 2013 for endorsement by Council before being referred to the Committee.

 

 

 

 

 

Matt Ryan

Manager Records & Governance

 

 

 

 

John Giovinazzo

Acting Director Corporate

 

 

Attachments:

A1View

Invitation to make submission - Committee on Electoral Matters Inquiry into the 2012 Local Government Elections

 

2012/312190

  


APPENDIX No: 1 - Invitation to make submission - Committee on Electoral Matters Inquiry into the 2012 Local Government Elections

 

Item No: GB.4

 





 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 5 February 2013

GB.5 / 107

 

 

Item GB.5

S02355

 

10 January 2013

 

 

Amendment to Council Meeting

Schedule for 2013

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

purpose of report:

To propose an amendment to Council’s adopted meeting cycle for 2013 to avoid Meetings being held during school holiday periods.

 

 

background:

Council adopted a meeting cycle for 2013 at the Ordinary Meeting of Council held on the 9 October 2012. There was an error in the recommendation of the report which has Council Meetings scheduled during three of the school holiday periods.

 

 

comments:

A draft amendment to the 2013 Council Meeting Cycle has been prepared for Council’s consideration.

 

 

recommendation:

That the amendments to Council’s Meeting Cycle for 2013 be adopted.

 

 

 


  

Purpose of Report

 

To propose an amendment to Council’s adopted meeting cycle for 2013 to avoid Meetings being held during school holiday periods.

 

Background

 

Council adopted a meeting cycle for 2013 at the Ordinary Meeting of Council held on 9 October 2012.  There was an error in the recommendation of the report which has Council Meetings scheduled during two of the school holiday periods.

 

Comments

 

A draft amendment to the 2013 Council Meeting Cycle has been prepared for Council’s consideration.

 

The school holiday periods for 2013 are:

 

Term 1:      Monday, 15 April 2013 to Friday, 26 April 2013

Term 2:      Monday, 1 July 2013 to Friday, 12 July 2013

Term 3:      Monday, 23 September 2013 to Monday, 7 October 2013

Term 4:      Monday 23 December 2013 to Tuesday, 28 January 2014

 

There are scheduled Council Meetings that fall within some of these periods.  Council has in the past resolved to re-schedule meetings during school holidays. To avoid the school holiday period and spread the meetings more evenly, the cycle should be amended.

 

It is recommended to amend the Meeting Cycle for 2013, as follows:

 

School Holidays: 15 April to 26 April 2013

 

30 April 2013              Ordinary Meeting of Council         (transferred from 23 April 2013)

 

School Holidays: 1 July to 12 July 2013

 

16 and 30 July 2013   Ordinary Meetings of Council       (transferred from 9 and 23 July 2013)

 

School Holidays: 23 September to 7 October 2013

 

17 September 2013   Ordinary Meeting of Council        (transferred from 24 September 2013)

 

School Holidays: 23 December to 28 January 2014

 

There are no proposed scheduled meetings during this school holiday break.

 

 

 

 

Governance Matters

 

Section 9 of the Local Government Act 1993 requires Council to give notice to the public of the times and places of its meetings. It has been Council’s usual practice in the past to resolve to amend its meeting cycle to take into account any school holidays.

 

Risk Management

 

The scheduling of Council meetings during school holidays could affect the ability of some community members attending meetings.

 

Financial Considerations

 

There are no financial considerations associated with this report.

 

Social Considerations

 

There are no social considerations associated with this report.

 

Environmental Considerations

 

There are no environmental considerations associated with this report.

 

Community Consultation

 

None undertaken or required.

 

Internal Consultation

 

None undertaken or required.

 

 

Summary

 

Section 9 of the Local Government Act 1993 requires Council to give notice to the public of the times and places of its meetings. It has been Council’s usual practice in the past to resolve to amend its meeting cycle to take into account the school holiday breaks.

 

Recommendation:

 

The proposed amendment to the 2013 meeting cycle is as follows:

 

For 2013:

 

February:                   5 February 2013              Ordinary Meeting of Council

                                 26 February 2013              Ordinary Meeting of Council

 

March:                     12 March 2013                  Ordinary Meeting of Council

                                 26 March 2013                  Ordinary Meeting of Council

 

April:                          9 April 2013                     Ordinary Meeting of Council

                                 30 April 2013                     Ordinary Meeting of Council

 

May:                         14 May 2013                      Ordinary Meeting of Council

                                 28 May 2013                      Ordinary Meeting of Council

 

June:                        11 June 2013                     Ordinary Meeting of Council

                                 25 June 2013                     Ordinary Meeting of Council

 

July:                         16 July 2013                      Ordinary Meeting of Council

                                 30 July 2013                      Ordinary Meeting of Council

 

August:                    13 August 2013                 Ordinary Meeting of Council

                                 27 August 2013                 Ordinary Meeting of Council

 

September:             10 September 2013          Ordinary Meeting of Council

                                 17 September 2013          Ordinary Meeting of Council

 

October:                     8 October 2013                Ordinary Meeting of Council

                                 22 October 2013                Ordinary Meeting of Council

 

November:              12 November 2013           Ordinary Meeting of Council

                                 26 November 2013           Ordinary Meeting of Council

 

December:                 3 December 2013            Ordinary Meeting of Council

                                 10 December 2013            Ordinary Meeting of Council

 

 

 

 

 

 

Christie Spry

Governance Officer

 

 

 

 

Matt Ryan

Manager Records & Governance

 

 

 

 

John Giovinazzo

Acting Director Corporate

 

 

 

Attachments:

A1View

Previous Report - Council Meeting Cycle for 2012

 

2013/006394

  


APPENDIX No: 1 - Previous Report - Council Meeting Cycle for 2012

 

Item No: GB.5

 







 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 5 February 2013

GB.6 / 117

 

 

Item GB.6

S06748/3

 

17 January 2013

 

 

Review of Financial Assistance Grants - Request for Contribution of Funds

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

purpose of report:

To consider the request from Sutherland Shire Council to a number of Councils for a financial contribution to engage expertise by the way of a consultant to prepare a submission on behalf of the involved Councils to the review of Financial Assistance Grants (FAGs) being held by the Commonwealth Grants Commission.

 

 

background:

A number of Councils which are currently on the minimum per capita FAG’s are concerned at the potential outcome of the Commonwealth Grants Commission’s 2013 Inquiry into Improving Local Government Financial Sustainability. The Commission has been asked to identify tangible measures for improving the impact of the Local Government FAGs on the effectiveness of local governments and their ability to provide service and asset renewal obligations. There is a growing movement for redistribution of FAG’s and if this occurs it may have a serious impact on these Councils.

Sutherland Shire Council is seeking the support from other ‘per capita minimum’ councils to engage the services of a consultant to prepare the submission.

 

 

comments:

The cost of the contribution will be dependant upon the number of Council’s participating, however it has been estimated that it could be between $4,000 to $5,000 per Council.

 

 

recommendation:

That Council considers whether it would like to contribute to this request for financial support from Sutherland Shire Council to engage the services of a consultant to prepare a submission to the Commission on the Financial Assistance Grants.

 

 

 


  

Purpose of Report

 

To consider the request from Sutherland Shire Council to a number of Councils for a financial contribution to engage expertise by the way of a consultant to prepare a submission on behalf of the involved Councils to the review of Financial Assistance Grants (FAGs) being held by the Commonwealth Grants Commission.

 

Background

 

A number of Councils which are currently on the minimum per capital Financial Assistance Grants are concerned at the potential outcome of the Commonwealth Grants Commission’s 2013 Inquiry into Improving Local Government Financial Sustainability. The Commission has been asked to identify tangible measures for improving the impact of the Local Governance Financial Assistance Grants (FAGs) on the effectiveness of local governments and their ability to provide service and asset renewal obligations. There is a growing movement for redistribution of Financial Assistance Grants and if this occurs it may have a serious impact on these Councils.

Sutherland Shire Council has written to a number of Councils (see Attachment A2) and is seeking the support from other ‘per capita minimum’ councils to engage the services of a consultant to prepare a submission to the Commission. Sutherland Shire Council has developed a consultant engagement brief (see Attachment A3) and has advised expressions of interest have already been received for the consultancy. Sutherland Shire Council is intending to interview two (2) parties later this month (see Attachment A1).

 

Comments

 

The indicative cost of the financial contribution will be dependant upon the number of Council’s participating, however it has been estimated that it could be between $4,000 and $5,000. All financial contributions would be equally split between the Councils involved.

 

Governance Matters

 

There is no governance considerations associated with the recommendation in this report.

 

Risk Management

 

There is a medium risk to Council if the review of the FAGs by the Commission results in the redistribution of financial assistance grants from Councils which may be deemed to have large financial capacity to Councils that require greater assistance. Council’s receiving the minimum per capita allocation under the financial assistance grants may be targeted and could suffer significant financial loss from the review.

 

Council currently receives approximately $2.5 million dollars a year from the Financial Assistance Grants.

 

A significant proportion of this grant is allocated to road works and any reduction in the allocation to road works will have a significant impact on the program and Council’s attempt to reduce the cost to bring its roads up to a satisfactory standard.

 

Financial Considerations

 

The indicative cost of the financial contribution will be dependant upon the number of Council’s participating, however it has been estimated that it could be between $4,000 and $5,000. All financial contributions would be equally split.

 

If Council approves the payment of this contribution, funding will need to be allocated in the Delivery Program and Operational Plan 2013/14.

 

Social Considerations

 

There is a risk that if Council’s receiving the minimum per capita allocation under the Financial Assistance Grants are targeted that some of Council’s Maintenance programs and the management of Council’s assets could be severely affected.

 

Environmental Considerations

 

There are no environmental considerations associated with the recommendation in this report.

 

Community Consultation

 

None undertaken or required.

 

Internal Consultation

 

Consultation has taken place between the Corporate Department and the Operations Department particularly on the impact of the loss of funding for roads.

 

Summary

 

To consider the request from Sutherland Shire Council to a number of Councils for a financial contribution to engage expertise by the way of a consultant to prepare a submission on behalf of the involved Councils to the review of Financial Assistance Grants being held by the Commonwealth Grants Commission.

A number of Councils which are currently on the ‘per capita minimum’ Financial Assistance Grants are concerned at the potential outcome of the Commonwealth Grants Commission’s 2013 Inquiry into Improving Local Government Financial Sustainability. The Commission has been asked to identify tangible measures for improving the impact of the Local Government Financial Assistance Grants (FAGs) on the effectiveness of local governments and their ability to provide service and asset renewal obligations. There is a growing movement for redistribution of Financial Assistance Grants and if this occurs it may have a serious impact on these ‘per capita minimum’ Councils.

Sutherland Shire Council has written to a number of Councils and is seeking the support from other ‘per capita minimum’ councils to engage the services of a consultant to prepare a submission to the Commission on behalf of the Council’s involved. Sutherland Shire Council has developed a consultant engagement brief and has advised expressions of interest have been already received for the consultancy. Sutherland Shire Council is intending to interview two (2) parties later this month.

 

Recommendation:

 

That Council considers whether it would like to contribute to this request for financial support from Sutherland Shire Council to engage the services of a consultant to prepare a submission to the Commission on the review of Financial Assistance Grants.

 

 

 

 

 

Christie Spry

Governance Officer

 

 

 

 

Matt Ryan

Manager Records & Governance

 

 

 

 

John Giovinazzo

Acting Director Corporate

 

 

 

Attachments:

A1View

Email from Sutherland Shire Council - Review of Financial Assistance Grants

 

2013/012835

 

A2View

Letter from Sutherland Shire Council - Review of Financial Assistance Grants

 

2013/012837

 

A3View

Draft Consultant Engagement Brief from Sutherland Shire Council - Review of Financial Assistance Grants

 

2013/012839

  


APPENDIX No: 1 - Email from Sutherland Shire Council - Review of Financial Assistance Grants

 

Item No: GB.6

 



 


APPENDIX No: 2 - Letter from Sutherland Shire Council - Review of Financial Assistance Grants

 

Item No: GB.6

 




APPENDIX No: 3 - Draft Consultant Engagement Brief from Sutherland Shire Council - Review of Financial Assistance Grants

 

Item No: GB.6

 








 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 5 February 2013

GB.7 / 134

 

 

Item GB.7

S05273

 

17 January 2013

 

 

Investment Report As At 31 December 2012

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

purpose of report:

To present to Council investments portfolio performance for December 2012.

 

 

background:

Council’s investments are reported monthly to Council in accordance with the Local Government Act 1993, the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 and Council’s Investment Policy.

 

 

comments:

The net return on investments for the 6 months ending December 2012 was $2,583,500 against a budget of $2,256,200, giving an YTD favourable variance of $327,300.

 

 

recommendation:

That the summary of investments performance for December 2012 be received and noted; and that the Certificate of the Responsible Accounting Officer be noted and report adopted. 

 

 

 


  

Purpose of Report

 

To present to Council investments portfolio performance for December 2012.

 

Background

 

Council’s investments are reported monthly to Council in accordance with the Local Government Act 1993, the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 and Council’s Investment Policy.

 

Comments

 

Investment Portfolio Performance Snapshot

 

The table below provides the investments portfolio performance against targets identified in Council’s Investment Policy as well as other key performance indicators based on industry benchmarks.

 

 

 

 

Cumulative Investment Return against Budget

 

The net return on investments for the 6 months ending December 2012 was $2,583,500 against a budget of $2,256,200, giving an YTD favourable variance of $327,300.

 

The total return on investments (interest and capital gain/loss) for the month of December is provided below.

 

 

 

 

A comparison of the cumulative investment returns against year to date budget is shown in Chart 1 below.

 

Chart 1 - Cumulative Investment Return YTD vs. Budget

 

 

 

Cash Flow and Investment Movements

 

Council’s total investment portfolio at the end of December 2012 is $74,396,300, a decrease of $21,386,500 since July 2012. The net cash outflow for the month was $25,377,900 mainly due to the acquisition of the administration building at 828 Pacific Highway Gordon.

 

During the month, no investments matured and there was one new investment made.

 

Table 1 below provides detailed movement of investments during the month by institution name, investment rating and interest rates.

 

 

Table 1 – Investment Movements (December 2012)

 

 

 

 

 

Investment Performance against Industry Benchmarks

 

Overall during the month of December the investments performance was well above industry benchmark. The benchmarks are specific to the type of investment and details provided below.

 

Ø Cash and at call investments are compared against the 11am Cash Rate. This applies to AMP Business Easy Saver Account and Westpac Maxi-I Investment Account.

 

Ø UBS Bank Bill Index is used for all other investments except Cash.

 

A comparison of the portfolio returns against investment benchmarks is provided in Table 2 below.

 

Table 2 - Investments Performance against Industry Benchmarks

 

 

 

 

Table below provides a summary of all investments by type and performance during the month. Attachment A1 provides definitions in relation to different types of investments.

 

 

Table 3 - Investments Portfolio Summary

 

 

 

* Weighted average returns excluding Cash/At Call

 

Investment by Credit rating and Maturity Profile

 

The allocation of Council’s investment by credit rating and the maturity profile are shown in the chart below:

 

Chart 2 - Credit Rating (Actual level of investment compared to proportion permitted by policy)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chart 3 - Maturity Profile (Excludes Cash)

 

 

There were no investments that matured/redeemed during the month of December.

 

Economic Analysis

 

International

 

·    December was a positive month for risk markets with equity and credit markets improving in response to positive news releases predominantly in the U.S and China. The US economy appears to be ticking along quite nicely with data releases showing a drop in unemployment to 7.7% with 146,000 new jobs created and retail sales coming in better than expected whilst industrial production also outperformed.

 

·    Fiscal cliff negotiations delivered a partial solution at the last possible moment in the US with tax rates for high income earners rising, spending cuts will be the next area of political jousting with an expectation that by the end of February an agreed package could be worked out. The US debt ceiling has again been reached and will also require a political solution to be reached. Both these areas will likely dominate news flow and markets over the next quarter.

 

Domestic

 

·    Domestic data releases were not so positive with almost all data showing a weaker than estimated local economy. This weakness and the flow on likely increased risks to growth lead the RBA to once again cut the official rate of interest by 25 basis points down to 3.00%. Locally, markets showed little reaction to the expected rate cut which is now seen down at an emergency setting in an attempt to stimulate an unsteady economy. The market however is still expecting more to come with some commentators looking for a cash rate at around 2% by year end 2013.

 

·    Domestic data releases were generally weak as mentioned above with retail sales showing no growth and Quarter 3 Gross Domestic Product showing only modest growth (+0.3%). Both business confidence and consumer confidence were dull which flowed on to zero growth in private sector credit. In addition, building approvals data released for October showed a drop of 7.6%. On the positive side of things employment data was again acceptable with November numbers showing a 14,000 job increase and the rate dropping down to 5.2%.

 

 

Governance Matters

 

Council’s investments are made in accordance with the Local Government Act (1993), the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 and Council’s Investment Policy which was adopted by Council on 20 April 2010.

 

Section 212 of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 states:

 

(1)     The responsible accounting officer of a council:

 

(a)     must provide the council with a written report (setting out details of all money that the council has invested under section 625 of the Act) to be presented:

 

(i)      if only one ordinary meeting of the council is held in a month, at that meeting, or

 

(ii)     if more than one such meeting is held in a month, at whichever of those meetings the council by resolution determines, and

 

(b)     must include in the report a certificate as to whether or not the investment has been made in accordance with the Act, the regulations and the council’s investment policies.

 

(2)     The report must be made up to the last day of the month immediately preceding the meeting.

 

Risk Management

 

The major risk associated with investments is price risk and that being the capital value of investments may fluctuate due to changes in market prices. These changes can be triggered by factors specific to individual financial instruments, their issuers or by factors affecting similar instruments traded in a market.

 

Cash & Investments are also subject to interest rate risk as changes in interest rates could also have an adverse impact on returns and income.

 

A further risk associated with Cash & Investments is credit risk where the investment counterparty may not complete their obligations particular to a financial instrument, resulting either a capital or income loss.

 

Council manages these risks by diversifying its portfolio and only purchasing investments with high credit ratings or capital guarantees.

 

Council’s new investments are considered low risk as they are only made in a form of investment notified by order of the Minister for Local Government and Council’s adopted Investment Policy. 

 

All investments are made with consideration of advice from Council’s appointed investment advisor, Denison Financial Advisory Services.

 

Financial Considerations

 

The budget for interest on investments for the financial year 2012/2013 is $4,512,400. Of this amount approximately $2,972,400 is restricted for the benefit of future expenditure relating to developers’ contributions, $583,300 transferred to the internally restricted Infrastructure & Facility Reserve, and the remainder of $956,700 is available for operations.

 

Social Considerations

 

Not applicable.

 

Environmental Considerations

 

Not applicable.

 

Community Consultation

 

None undertaken or required.

 

Internal Consultation

 

None undertaken or required.

 

Certification - Responsible Accounting Officer

 

I hereby certify that the investments listed in the attached report have been made in accordance with Section 625 of the Local Government Act 1993, clause 212 of the Local Government General Regulation 2005 and Council’s Investment Policy which was adopted by Council on 20 April 2010.

 

Summary

 

As at 31 December2012:

 

 

Ø Council’s total investment portfolio is $74,396,300, which is a decrease of $21,386,500 compared to an opening balance of $95,782,800 at 1 July 2012.

 

Ø Council’s net return on investments for the 6 months ending December 2012 was $2,583,500 against a budget of $2,256,200, giving an YTD favourable variance of $327,300.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recommendation:

 

A.   That the summary of investments and performance for December 2012 be received and noted.

 

B.   That the Certificate of the Responsible Accounting Officer be noted and the report adopted.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tony Ly

Financial Accounting Officer

 

 

 

 

Angela Apostol

Acting Manager Finance

 

 

 

 

John McKee

General Manager

 

 

 

Attachments:

A1View

Investments definitions specific to Council’s investment portfolio

 

2012/223363

  


APPENDIX No: 1 - Investments definitions specific to Council’s investment portfolio

 

Item No: GB.7

 


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 5 February 2013

GB.8 / 143

 

 

Item GB.8

S02668

 

6 November 2012

 

 

Draft Abandoned Shopping Trolley Policy

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

purpose of report:

To present to Council the proposed Abandoned Shopping Trolley Policy.

 

 

background:

On 28 August 2012 Council resolved to place the draft Abandoned Shopping Trolley Policy on public exhibition.

 

 

comments:

The draft Abandoned Shopping Trolley Policy was placed on public exhibition from Friday 28 September to Friday,
26 October 2012. This report provides an assessment of the submissions received and recommended amendments to the  draft Abandoned Shopping Trolley Policy

 

 

recommendation:

That the draft Abandoned Shopping Trolley Policy, as attached to this report be adopted by Council.

 

 

 


  

Purpose of Report

 

To present to Council the proposed Abandoned Shopping Trolley Policy. 

 

 

Background

 

On 5 March 2012, Council, in an attempt to engage both the retailer and shopper, resolved to call for the development of a policy to control shopping trolleys in retail centres within Ku-ring-gai. It had been noted that the increasing housing densities near local community shopping precincts was having a corresponding affect on the incidence of abandoned shopping trolleys on street verges outside nearby multi unit housing developments and upon other community lands. This emergent practice is creating problems in terms of visual clutter and pedestrian and motoring hazards.

 

On 28 August 2012, Council considered and endorsed a draft abandoned shopping trolley policy for the purpose of public exhibition.

 

 

Comments

 

The draft Abandoned Shopping Trolley Policy was placed on public exhibition from Friday 28 September to Friday 26 October 2012. At the close of the exhibition 8 written submissions, including a posting on Council’s face book page, were received.

 

The public exhibition also attracted two telephone calls from residents voicing their support for the proposed policy and a request and subsequent meeting with a  representatives of “Trolley Trackers.” This report provides an assessment of the submissions and recommendations for appropriate amendments to draft Abandoned Shopping Trolley Policy.

 

Copies of the written submissions received have been circulated to all Councillors separately.

 

Written  submissions were received from:

 

Julia Eagles                                     Julia.eagles@optusneet.com.au

Viswa Mohan                                    (via face book)

Paul Cleary                                                clea1pau@police.nsw.gov.au

Nicky Lord                                       407/3 Sturt place St Ives       Nicky.Lord@stryker.com

Tracey Goulston                               PO Box 63 St Ives         - gorgeouscalling@hotmail.com

Coles Supermarkets                       L3/6 Griffnock Ave, Macquarie Park NSW  2113

Mark Taylor                                     mark@bob.sh

R A Johnson                                     24 Stanley Close, St Ives 2075

 

The submissions raised the following issues:

 

 

 

 

 

Any written educational materials developed should be translated into the most common languages in use within Ku-ring-gai

 

It is the intention to supply all educational materials in accordance with Council’s Access and Equity Policy.

 

The policy should be a compromise that allows use of trolleys by those walking to and from the shops as this is a healthy community option and eases congestion in car parks. Coin operated trolleys with refund would support this style of policy. The deposit should be set high enough to encourage trolley return by the shopper or other persons.

 

It is the long term intention, with the redevelopment of our local centres, that trolleys be restricted to the immediate shopping precinct. In the interim, it would be preferable if Council could persuade existing supermarkets to install coin deposit trolley return systems.

 

Council should continue to support members of the community who cannot drive, such as the elderly, with schemes such as a Shopping Bus provided by Ku-ring-gai Neighbourhood centre.

 

Council supports community shopping via use of its library bus and partnership with the Hornsby Ku-ring-gai Community Transport bus service.

 

Abandoned shopping trolleys make the area ugly and give the perception of the area being unsafe. Council should consider the policy on abandoned shopping trolleys with an updated graffiti management policy.

 

Council is currently implementing a new graffiti management system with “vandaltrak”, a smart phone application for graffiti reporting and management.

 

Council should provide an abandoned trolley retrieval system.

 

The provision of such a system would be costly. A specialty truck with lifting or ramp equipment, staff and an impounding area would need to be provided. The experiences in other local government areas indicate that this is not a sustainable option. Supermarkets operators are generally unwilling to retrieve impounded objects, as the trolleys are, in some cases damaged. The fee Council would need to set to achieve full cost recovery of the service would not be attractive to supermarket operators as they would be able to purchase new trolleys at only a marginally greater cost.  Woolworths successfully appealed a case against Waverly Council in 1999 regarding impounding fees.

 

It is considered more appropriate that supermarkets, as the owners of trolleys, be solely responsible for their collection and containment.

 

The  policy should advocate a full containment system within the premises similar to that in the Willoughby Council area.

 

The proposed policy requires all future development of stores, both new and those undergoing significant renovation or upgrade, to include a trolley management system that discourages removal of the trolleys off site. Containment systems suggested being coin/operated deposit systems, wheel locking systems or physical barriers such as bollards or specialty paving.

 

It is acknowledged that the trolleys provided by major stores within the Chatswood CBD , specifically within the  Westfield and Chatswood Chase complexes, are contained by electronic wheel locking systems. These systems were installed at the time of major redevelopment of the centres. The feedback from centre management is that the systems are generally successful but that some shoppers tamper with the trolleys, using screwdrivers to disable the locking devices. Those trolleys that manage to escape the electronic wheel locking system are collected via contractors employed by the supermarkets and returned to the stores.

 

It is interesting to note that other local village shops within the Willoughby local government area , such as Northbridge Woolworths and IGA Castlecrag have no containment or deposit  systems currently in place. Those centres and shops are very similar to the current style within Ku-ring-gai. That is, the shops which open directly out onto public footpaths , roadways or Council car parks.

 

The relevance of case law regarding Woolworths vs Waverly Council

 

This appeal in 1999 concerned the impounding fees being charged by Waverly Council for the impounding of 10 trolleys. At the time, the cost being claimed by Council against Woolworths was $100 per trolley.

 

The case was not in regard to management of trolleys as suggested in one of the submissions.

 

Legal argument was put regarding the actual fee as to why the fee was not differential for each trolley dependent on the number of days impounded.  Legal argument was also put against the time frame permitted to appeal the impounding of the trolleys.

 

Initially, the case was dismissed by the Waverly Local Court. Woolworths then appealed to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court found that the matter should not have been dismissed and referred it back to the local court.

 

There is no reported decision of the local court but for an internet search it would appear that mediation was instigated to settle the case, with both parties being mindful of the costs that had been incurred in the Supreme Court hearing.

 

Press releases at the time refer to both parties adopting a code of practice for abandoned shopping trolleys.

 

Council may issue penalties for a breach under Environmental Planning & Assessment Act, 1979 in respect of fire safety.

 

It is agreed that Council may issue penalties in respect of either blocking a fire exit or non compliance with a condition of consent.

 

However, as the draft policy is generally concerned with abandoned trolleys in public areas, fire safety is not the focus or currently an issue for this policy. Council has in place other measures under its fire safety program to address this matter.

 

 

 

 

General enforcement powers

 

The draft policy sets out Council’s powers under the Impounding Act, 1993, which is the appropriate legislation to deal with abandoned articles on public lands. The Act states “a person who abandons an article in a public place is guilty of an offence.” It is the individual, usually the shopper, who abandons the trolley that is at fault. Regulatory officers do regularly patrol the area in an attempt to accost offenders and educate them. The adoption of this policy and the generation and supply of targeted educational materials would provide a much needed resource to the regulatory officer’s kit.

 

Shopping trolley return bays

 

The draft policy calls for the adequate supply of shopping trolley return bays in all car parks utilised by shoppers to encourage the return of trolleys to a single location in order to minimise the potential for injury or damage to other users of the area. One of the submissions calls on Council not to supply such facilities on its land.  Two other submissions called on Council to include within its policy suitable wording to ensure that an adequate number of trolley bays are supplied. Two telephone callers to Council, attracted by the public advertisement of the draft policy, called for Council to supply trolley collection bays near bus stops and taxi ranks , so that those shoppers who use public transport, can safely stack trolleys together before boarding a bus or a taxi.   In direct response to these submissions, the draft policy has been suitably amended so as to include a provision within the “design principles for trolley bays” for designers and developers to include a sufficient number of trolley bays near bus stops and taxi ranks.

 

It is also important that a sufficient supply of trolley bays should be provided, whether on private lands or within Council car parks in shopping districts so that shoppers with young children can safely return a trolley and maintain close proximity, and line of sight to their vehicle, as children  may be in a child car seat whilst the goods are unloaded. The draft policy has been amended so as to more clearly indicate these requirements.

 

 

Governance Matters

 

Nil

 

 

Risk Management

 

Council’s Risk Manager has advised that Council does not accept and cannot be held liable for the irresponsible actions of patrons using trolleys. Council understands that each shop and or centre management maintains their own insurance cover to deal with such situations. Council advises any enquirer that incidents with trolleys are simply fortuitous and beyond Council’s control and we are unable to assist them with their claim, referring then back to the shop or centre in question.

 

There is no risk to Council wether a policy to deal with abandoned trolleys is adopted or not.

 

 

 

 

Financial Considerations

 

Implementation of the policy is expected to cost in the order of $14,000 with a further $1,500 annually allocated for on going education. This program will need to be funded from Council’s Environmental Levy Fund.

 

The funding is required to support targeted education programs and the initial audit of supermarkets.

 

 

Social Considerations

 

Some community members believe that an accumulation of abandoned shopping trolleys give the perception of the area being unsafe. To allow the continuation of such practices un-checked would certainly erode the amenity of the local neighbourhoods. In order to actively address the problems there needs to be a firm commitment from shoppers and supermarket management, with Council taking an educational, support, facilitation and enforcement role.

 

Environmental Considerations

 

Implementation of this policy would assist in preserving the visual amenity of Ku-ring-gai Local Government Area as wayward trolleys can become an environmental hazard in our bushland, creeks and waterways.

 

The University of Newcastle has shown that the production involved in the replacement of every 20 shopping trolleys, would discharge an additional tonne of carbon dioxide into the earth’s atmosphere.

 

Community Consultation

 

The draft Abandoned Shopping Trolley Policy was placed on exhibition in accordance with Council’s resolution of 28 August 2012.

 

Advertisements and editorial articles were placed in the local papers; a notice was placed on Council’s web home page and face book posting. All advertisements and notices advised of the public exhibition period Friday 28 September to Friday 26 October 2012.

 

The public exhibition resulted in seven written submissions, 2 telephone calls and one face to face meeting.

 

As a consequence of issues raised during the consultation period, the following amendments have been made to the exhibited draft policy:

 

Off site retrieval

 

Replaced “centralised services such as “Trolley Trackers”” with the words “Contract trolley collection service providers” so as to be generic in nature, rather than service operator specific.

 

Publicising systems

 

Included a specific requirement for “all educational material to be supplied in accordance with Council’s Access and Equity Policy”

 

Shopping trolley bays

 

·    Included within the design principles the need for “a sufficient number of bays to be provided so that shoppers with young children can safely return a trolley and maintain a line of sight to their vehicle as children may be in a car seat when goods are unloaded”

 

·    “consideration should be given to supplying trolley bays near bus stops and taxi stands so that shoppers who use public transport can safely stack trolleys before boarding a bus or a train.”

 

Implementation through the development application process

 

Included an interim step for Council to meet with all local supermarkets and encourage their voluntary adoption of a suitable trolley management system, even if they are not planning on formally upgrading their stores at this stage.

 

 

Internal Consultation

 

Consultation with other departments of Council has occurred where relevant in the preparation of this report and draft policy.

 

Summary

 

On 28 August 2012 Council resolved to place the draft Abandoned Shopping Trolley Policy on exhibition. A total of 11 submissions were received, 8 written, 2 telephone calls and one face to face meeting in response to the exhibition. This report provides an assessment of the submissions received.

 

The preparation of the draft policy has involved extensive investigations of both local and overseas policies and systems dealing with shopping trolley management. It is the conclusion that there is no one best solution to the problem.  Best practice management solutions include a mix of education, understanding of the individual  local retail centre and its interface with public domain, car parking and public transport arrangements, and finally,  supermarket commitments to work with shoppers and local authorities.

 

In order to be effective, any commitment to fix the problem of abandoned shopping trolleys must include shoppers and supermarket management with Council taking an educational, support, facilitation and enforcement role.

 

Recommendation

 

A.       That the draft Abandoned Shopping Trolley Policy as attached to the report be adopted by Council.

 

B.       That Council meet with local supermarket managers, advise them of our policy to deal with abandoned shopping trolleys and seek their voluntary adoption of a suitable shopping trolley management plan that would assist in curtailing the problem.

 

C.       That all persons who made submissions be notified of Council’s decision.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Anne Seaton

Manager Regulation & Compliance

 

 

 

 

Michael Miocic

Director Development & Regulation

 

 

Attachments:

A1View

Draft Abandoned Shopping Trolley Policy

 

2013/020958

  


APPENDIX No: 1 - Draft Abandoned Shopping Trolley Policy

 

Item No: GB.8

 

KU-RING-GAI COUNCIL

 

DRAFT ABANDONED SHOPPING TROLLEYS POLICY

 

 

 

 

1.    PURPOSE

 

To address the ongoing problem of shopping trolleys being abandoned or left unattended in public places, providing a guide for Council staff, retailers, developers and the community on how to manage shopping trolleys so as to reduce trolley abandonment.

 

2.    SCOPE

 

This policy applies to all shopping centres, supermarkets and other retail businesses supplying trolleys for its customers that are located within Ku‑ring‑gai.

 

3.    OBJECTIVES

 

·      To preserve the visual amenity of the Ku-ring-gai Local Government Area.

·      To recognise and respond to community expectations in minimising the problem of abandoned shopping trolleys.

·      To provide for the safety of shoppers, pedestrians and road users.

·      To clarify Council’s obligations in dealing with abandoned or unattended shopping trolleys.

·      To guide retailers and shopping centre management on the on-going management of shopping trolleys and Council’s expectations.

·      To provide a framework and guide for development applicants and Council staff assessing Development Applications for supermarkets  and other substantial retail outlets that supply shopping trolleys, on implementation of a trolley containment system that encourages the confinement of trolleys to the retailers’ premises.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Approved

 

Position

Name

Signature

Date

Manager Compliance & Regulation

Anne Seaton

 

 

Director Development & Regulation

Michael Miocic

 

 

General Manager

John McKee

 

 

 

 

4.    INTRODUCTION

 

Shopping trolleys are an integral part of the retail distribution network. Trolleys are a principal shopping aid providing an effective and practical means of transporting purchased goods.

 

In times past, shopping trolleys were usually taken from the store to a nearby vehicle. Goods were unloaded and the trolley was either immediately returned to the store or placed within a designated trolley collection area within the shopping precinct. On occasion, trolleys were found outside of the retail area. In recent times, particularly with the increasing housing densities within and near our local centres, trolleys are commonly being found discarded many blocks from any retail store. It is evident that residents living in accommodation near local centres, choose to transport their goods back to their residences in a shopping trolley rather than relying on a motor vehicle. The trolleys once unloaded are discarded on the street verge and are rarely returned to the retailer by the shopper. This practice is creating problems in terms of visual clutter and pedestrian and motoring hazards.

 

This policy attempts to engage both the retailer and shopper in a more responsible course of action so as to manage this problem within and around our developing local centres.

 

5.  BACKGROUND

 

It is estimated there are more than two million shopping trolleys across the country, or one trolley for every eleven  Australians.  Many of these trolleys are stolen and left abandoned. Across Australia, the retail industry spends more that $200 million a year collecting, repairing, maintaining and replacing trolleys. As well as being a significant cost, wayward trolleys can become an environmental hazard in our  bushland and waterways.

 

Saving trolleys which would otherwise have to be replaced helps reduce waste and carbon pollution. Research by Associate Professor John Lucas and his team from the University of Newcastle has shown that the production  involved in the replacement  of every  20 shopping trolleys would discharge an additional tonne of carbon dioxide into the earth’s atmosphere.

 

The difficulties presented in managing shopping trolleys effectively and the risks that abandoned trolleys present vary from store to store, so there is no “one-size fits all” solution. This policy presents a range of options and a process for evaluating and addressing trolley abandonment that can form the basis for discussion with trolley owners and serve to guide Council, as an enforcement authority, in dealing with this problem.

 

Many in the community are of the opinion that Council may issue monetary penalties against retailers whose shopping trolleys are found abandoned in the local area. This is not the correct.  Abandoned articles are governed by the Impounding Act 1993. The Act states “a person who abandons an article in a public place is guilty of an offence.”  There is no regulatory offence committed by the retailer who supplies the trolley. It is the individual, usually the shopper, who abandons the trolley, that is at fault.

 

6.    MANAGING THE ISSUE

 

Assessing the problem

 

In the first instance, retailers should have a system of regularly monitoring trolley numbers to determine if any are being lost from their stores. Where significant losses are identified, retailers should review their trolley management procedures to identify how these can be reduced.

 

The risk and urgency of remedial action will be increased by a number of factor such as proximity to vulnerable watercourses or high levels of concern /complaint from the local community.

 

Tackling the problem.

 

Where a significant trolley abandonment problem is identified retailers will need to take remedial steps. Physically preventing trolleys from leaving shopping centres/ retail areas  is always the preferred approach, though this is not always possible.

 

Where trolleys are not in use for long periods ( e.g. when the store is closed) it is good practice to secure them. Where trolleys are being lost during trading hours, several devices are available to make it harder for trolleys to be removed from shops and shopping centres.

 

These devices are not always appropriate for every store location and will not prevent trolleys being removed by determined persons. There are several devices available including;

 

·    Wheel locking devices fitted to wheels that activate when the trolley crosses cables/ magnetic paving in the ground at either exits or the entire perimeter of the premises.

·    Installation of bollards or specialised paving presenting a physical barrier to the removal of trolleys from premises.

·    Trolley locks that require insertion of a coin to release the trolley.

 

So as not to disadvantage any particular retailer, all retailers supplying trolleys should adopt a similar approach in the installation of such devices.

 

Off site retrieval

 

Where trolleys from a particular store are known to be regularly abandoned, retailers should have in place a system to ensure trolleys are collected within a reasonable time frame.

 

Contract trolley collection service providers usually have agreed routes, servicing known hot spots for abandoned trolleys  Centralised services such as “Trolley Trackers” accept  general reports from the public, which are referred to the appropriate collector for prompt collection.

 

Retailers who choose to operate their own independent collection system should ensure that they direct staff to collect trolleys on and off site within a one kilometre radius along designated routes to cover as efficiently as possible the locations where trolleys are most likely to be abandoned.

 

No matter what system is in place, retailers should advertise the ways in which customers can report abandoned trolleys, e.g. through a local hotline or direct number to the store.

 

This will help to identify where the trolleys are being abandoned and enable them to be collected quickly.

 

Publicising systems

 

Retailers should clearly mark their trolleys so that the owner can easily be identified and alerted, this will assist in the quick return of the trolley to the correct store. Where trolley hotline phone numbers are available, retailers should provide these details on the trolley to assist in the return of trolleys.

 

Publicising the systems in place may be done in various ways.  This may include notices within the retail store both written and verbal over in-store messaging, notices upon trolley endplate advertising signage and advertising in local newspapers or other media.

 

All educational materials should be supplied in accordance with Council’s Access and Equity Policy.

 

Shopping trolley return bays

 

Trolley bays provide a simple and effective method for the interim storage and collection of shopping trolleys. They are required to be provided in all car parks utilised by shoppers  to encourage shoppers to return trolleys to a single location to minimise potential for injury or damage to other users of the area. Bays may be located in either car parking areas or pedestrian areas depending on which will cause the least inconvenience to users and encourage maximum participation.

 

Design principles for trolley bays include

 

·    bays should be clearly visible to encourage use and to avoid collisions by cars and pedestrians

·    rails or walls should be sufficiently high to be seen by car drivers and pedestrians and should be light coloured and incorporate reflectorised panels if the area is used at night

·    bays should be graded so that free rolling trolleys move into rather than out of the bay

·    rails should be rounded to reduce chance of injury

·    a buffer should be incorporated to stop trolleys rolling right through the bay

·    parking bays adjacent to the trolley bay should be treated as though they were next to a wall

·    foundations should be designed to resist damage by vandals

·    a sufficient number of bays should be provided so that shoppers with young children can safely return a trolley and maintain a line of sight to their vehicle as children may be in a car seat when goods are unloaded

·    consideration should be given to supplying trolley bays near bus stops and taxi stands so that shoppers who use public transport can safely nest trolleys before alighting on the bus or within the taxi

 

Bays located on Council land require the prior approval of Council and may be subject to payment of an annual fee for lease of the land occupied.

 

Development Applications relating to stores that supply trolleys

 

DAs for all future development of stores, both new, and those undergoing significant renovation or upgrade, post adoption of this policy are to include a trolley management system that discourages the removal of trolleys off site.

 

DAs for supermarkets, department stores and substantial retail outlets are to include a Plan of Management (POM) for the on-site storage, collection, (both on and off site) and the management of shopping trolleys provided by one or more retailers within the shopping centre.

 

The POM shall include:

 

·    the location and design principles for trolley storage bays.

·    a trolley containment system that encourages the confinement of trolleys to the retailer’s premises. Containment systems may include the following ( but not limited to):

-     coin/token operated systems with refund

-     trolleys with wheel locks activated by radio signal or magnetic strip

-     specialised paving, installation of bollards or other physical barriers that limit the removal of trolleys from the centre

 

The POM shall also include reference regarding the intended signage and public education programs which may include (but not limited to):

 

-     signage within stores and car parks

-     signage at entry and exit points of stores and car parks

-     signage on trolleys

-     pamphlets in stores explaining the need for customer co-operation

-     local newspaper publicity

-     in-store messaging over PA systems

 

The POM should include the commitment of the retailer or shopping centre management to the implementation of actions identified within the POM.

 

In the interim, Council should meet with all local supermarkets and encourage their voluntary adoption of a suitable trolley management system.

 

7.    RESPONSIBILITIES

 

The Director Development and Regulation is responsible for the publicising and implementation of the policy, particularly in regard to the application of the policy to future development applications for shopping centres, supermarkets and other retail stores supplying shopping trolleys for their customers.

 

Council’s regulatory officers will address legislative non-compliances. Regulatory staff will also assist with the reporting of abandoned trolleys so as to ensure quick retrieval by the trolley owners.

 

The community should recognise that shopping trolleys are provided as a courtesy and a service. Where Council finds it necessary to deal with abandoned trolleys, this cost is ultimately passed onto the ratepayer. The community should acknowledge that it is an offence to abandon a trolley in a public place and this may lead to a fine.

 

8.    REVIEW

 

This policy will be reviewed within five years of adoption or earlier should circumstances arise to warrant a revision.

 

9.    APPLICATION OF ESD PRINCIPLES

 

Ecological and social integrity – minimizing potential community and environmental impacts of abandoned or unattended shopping trolleys.

 

 

 


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 5 February 2013

GB.9 / 156

 

 

Item GB.9

DA0442/12

 

12 November 2012

 

 

development application

 

 

Summary Sheet

 

Report title:

Land Subdivision of Precinct 1 into 13 lots

ITEM/AGENDA NO:

GB.9

 

 

Application No:

DA0442/12

Property Details:

100 Eton Road, Lindfield – UTS Ku-ring-gai Campus

Lot & DP No:  Lot 1, DP 1151638; Proposed Lot 6 DP 270770

Site area:           1.89Ha

Zoning: R1 -  General Residential

Ward:

Roseville

Proposal/Purpose:

The purpose of the report is to determine the subdivision of Precinct 1 into 13 lots, consistent with the development pattern envisaged under MP06_0130.

 

Type of Consent:

Integrated – S.100B Rural Fires Act 1997

Applicant:

Defence Housing Australia

Owner:

Defence Housing Australia

Date Lodged:

31 October 2012

Recommendation:

Approval.

 

 

  

 


Purpose of Report

 

The purpose of the report is to determine the subdivision of Precinct 1 into 13 lots, consistent with the development pattern envisaged under MP06_0130.

 

Executive Summary

 

In 2008, the NSW Minister for Planning under the now repealed Part 3A of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979  granted consent for a Concept plan that facilitated redevelopment of the UTS Ku-ring-gai Campus for medium density residential development of up to 345 dwellings in the form of apartments, attached dwellings (townhouses) and detached single dwellings.

 

Council at its meeting of 26 June 2012, determined DA0677/11 which represented the first application for development on site, pursuant to the development scheme envisaged under Concept Approval MP06_0130. Subsequent to DA0677/11, Council has also approved a DA for residential flat developments on site being DA0270/12.

 

The application before Council seeks to further subdivide an allotment of land created under the initial subdivision of the site under DA0677/11.

 

Precinct 1 (or Lot 6 in the subdivision of DA0677/11) in the Concept Approval contains 10 dwelling houses, a 2 storey residential flat building and 12 small lot dwelling houses. This subdivision application seeks to create the 10 lots for the dwelling houses, a dedicated allotment for the residential flat building, a ‘super lot’ for the future small lot dwelling houses and a dedicated lot for the road. Precinct 1 will be a Community Subdivision arrangement and the roadway servicing the allotments will be a private road.

 

The proposed development is assessed as being satisfactory for the site and is generally consistent with the Part 3A Concept Approval as required.

 

History

 

Site

 

In 1967, work began on the initial stages of what is today UTS Ku-ring-gai. Following construction in several stages, the site reached its current capacity and configuration in the mid 1980’s.

 

After failed rezoning attempts in the early parts of the 2000’s, the Minister for Planning announced on 12 December 2005 that the NSW Department of Planning would consider the subject site as a state significant site and on 14 June 2007 declared a Major Project under the now repealed Part 3A of the EP&A Act for the site’s redevelopment. A Concept plan for the site’s redevelopment was subsequently lodged. On 11 June 2008, the Minister for Planning approved Concept plan MP06_0130 and at this time also gazetted amendments to Schedule 3 of SEPP (Major Development) 2005 which established the necessary planning framework for the redevelopment of the UTS Ku-ring-gai site.

 

The Concept Approval (Annexure B) has undergone 4 modifications, with these modifications mostly addressing errors within the Concept Approval’s conditions. Although the second and third modifications to the Concept Approval addressed errors, it also changed to a degree the approved concept, including the reconfiguration of Precincts 2 & 3, facilitated the retention of the University’s gym and footbridge and also included the realignment of zone boundaries to improve the future configuration of the development. The changes also included amendments to SEPP (Major Development) 2005 to enable demolition and subdivision on site that had otherwise been overlooked by the Department. The most recent modification considered by the Department redistributed dwelling yields throughout the site and re-aligned building footprints to be consistent with the Urban Design Guidelines.

 

To that end, the Concept Approval currently consents to the following:

 

·    retention and adaptive reuse of the main campus building for either an educational or commercial use, subject to separate approval

·    provision of a 9,800sqm soccer field and 300sqm of community space to be dedicated to Ku-ring-gai Council

·    dedication of 34,570sqm of bushland to the NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service

·    new residential development ranging from detached single dwellings to 5 storey residential flat buildings for a maximum of 345 dwellings. The ratio of this is broken down into 10 single lot dwellings, 25 integrated dwellings (or townhouses) and 310 apartments

·    a street and pedestrian network that extends and integrates with the existing streets and footpaths

·    asset protection zones for bushfire management

 

The current application is derived from the development scheme within the Concept Approval. As the Minister’s Approval is for a concept only, the detail necessary to successfully realise a large scale brown field development of this capacity necessitates a series of further development applications. Council has the delegation to determine these under the provisions of the Concept Approval and the special development provisions of the KPSO (which were recently migrated to it from the Major Development SEPP by the Department of Planning and Infrastructure).

 

An assessment of the subject Development Application against the Concept Approval is provided in this report.

 

Pre-DA

 

No Pre-DA was held in respect of this application.

 

DA History

 

31 October 2012 – Application lodged

 

8 November 2012 – Application notified

 

 

 

 

 

The Site

 

Site Description

 

Site Description

 

Visual character study category:

Post 1968

Easements/rights of way:

Yes – various drainage easements and rights of way

Heritage Item:

Yes – Local

Heritage conservation area:

No

In the vicinity of a heritage item:

No

Bush fire prone land:

Yes

Endangered species:

Yes – Darwina biflora; Red Crowned Toadlet

Urban bushland:

Yes

Contaminated land:

No

 

 

The subject site is known as 100 Eton Road, Lindfield (comprising Lot 1 DP 1151638), known commonly as UTS Ku-ring-gai. The University still occupies and operates from the site.

 

The UTS Ku-ring-gai campus is a 20.8ha parcel of land which is bounded by the Lane Cove National Park to the east, south and west and residential development in the suburb of Lindfield to the north.

 

The portion of the site being redeveloped is the northern section of the site, with the existing university buildings to remain.

 

The resultant developable portion of the site is 13.68ha and includes bushland which surrounds the UTS campus buildings, car parking areas dedicated to the campus, sporting facilities (including oval and tennis courts), a childcare centre as well as associated internal roads.

 

The site is located within the catchments of College, Sugarbag and Blue Gum Creeks, which are tributaries of the Lane Cove River, flowing into Sydney Harbour. Topographically, the already developed portions of the site are on sandstone plateaus, which fall away to steep, heavily vegetated gullies. Vegetation communities vary with the topography and aspect of the site and include vegetation communities of Heath-leaved Banksia / Scribbly Gum closed bushland; Sydney Red Gum Forest; Sydney Red Gum / Sydney Peppermint Forest / Red Bloodwood Open Forest. These communities support known threatened species including Darwina biflora, Pseudophyrne australis – Red crowned toadlet and Ninox strenua – Powerful owl.

 

The developable portion of the site has been broken up into a series of land zonings under KPSO to facilitate its redevelopment. Attachment A highlights the various zones established by the KPSO (derived from the Major Development SEPP), as well as the site’s spatial setting.

 

The aerial photograph below details the part of the site being subdivided under this application:

 

Surrounding development

 

The UTS Ku-ring-gai site is located on the periphery of the Ku-ring-gai Local Government Area and is bounded, with the exception of the northern part of the site, by the Lane Cove National Park. The land to the north of the site accommodates low density residential development located along Winchester, Lyle and Kimo Streets. The Film Australia site (101 Eton Road) is located in the middle of the UTS site and effectively divides the north into two blocks. Historically, surrounding development has been undertaken to respond to the varying topography of the surrounding area. The aerial photograph below (Figure 1) highlights surrounding development patterns within the vicinity of the UTS Ku-ring-gai site.

 

 

Figure 1

 

The Proposal

 

The development proposed is for a ‘paper subdivision’ to create the following lots:

 

·    Lot 1 –  for the community road servicing Precinct 1

·    Lots 2 to 11 – for the detached housing within Precinct 1

·    Lot 12 – for the residential flat building approved under DA0270/12

·    Lot 13 – super lot for the future small lot housing within Precinct 1.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The extract from the submitted plans details the lots to be created:

 

Consultation

 

Community

 

The application was notified to surrounding residents for a period of 14 days (8 November to 22 November 2012), as required by Council’s Notification DCP 56.

 

During the notification period, one submission was received as follows:

 

1.       Office of Environment & Heritage – PO Box 668, Parramatta NSW

 

The Office of Environment & Heritage has considered the proposed development. It is noted that the threatened plant species Darwina biflora, has been recorded at the location of the proposed subdivision. This does not appear to be acknowledged in the information supporting the application. The OEH recommends that Council assess the impacts of the development on the threatened species, notwithstanding that the subdivision does not involve any physical works

 

The area of the site being subdivided as part of this development application does not contain any Darwina biflora. Areas of the site containing the threatened species have been clearly identified and protected under the Concept Approval. Council’s Ecological Assessment Officer has reviewed the development application and is satisfied the development will not impact upon the identified communities of Darwina biflora.

 

Within Council

 

Engineering:

 

The application was referred to Council’s Development Engineer. Due to the minor nature of the subdivision and that no physical works were proposed, no issues were raised with the proposal, subject to conditions (Condition 17).

 

Landscaping:

 

The application was referred to Council’s Landscape Assessment Officer. The following comments were provided:

 

Site characteristics

The site falls to the north and west from the existing carpark. The site supports an area of bushland that back onto residential properties. Lot 2 adjoins the Asset Protection Zone (APZ). Lot 11 adjoins Screen Australia

 

Tree impacts

No physical works are proposed as part of this development.

 

Bushfire

All lots are required to be maintained as Inner Protection Areas in accordance with Planning for Bushfire Protection 2006.

 

Conclusion

The proposal is considered acceptable. No landscape conditions are required.

 

Ecology:

 

Council’s Ecological Assessment Officer has considered the proposed subdivision, as well as the associated management plans from the Concept Approval. In the case of the identified areas of Darwina Biflora and habitat for the red-crowned toadlet, the management and protection practices proposed are assessed as being satisfactory and consistent with the framework established as part of the Major Project assessment.

 

External bodies

 

Rural Fire Service:

 

As the proposed development application represents subdivision of bushfire prone plan, pursuant of S.100B of the Rural Fires Act 1997, the development is integrated development. The application was referred to the Rural Fire Service, who provided concurrence, subject to the following conditions being imposed (Condition 10):

 

This response is to be deemed a bush fire safety authority as required under section

100B of the 'Rural Fires Act 1997' and is issued subject to the following numbered

conditions:

 

Asset Protection Zones

The intent of measures is to provide sufficient space and maintain reduced fuel

loads so as to ensure radiant heat levels of buildings are below critical limits and to

prevent direct flame contact with a building. To achieve this, the following conditions

shall apply:

 

1.   At the issue of subdivision certificate and in perpetuity the entire property shall be managed as an inner protection area (IPA) as outlined within section 4.1.3 and Appendix 5 of 'Planning for Bush Fire Protection 2006' and the NSW Rural Fire Service's document 'Standards for asset protection zones'.

 

Statutory Provisions

State Environmental Planning Policies

 

State Environmental Planning Policy No. 19- Urban Bushland

 

The provisions of SEPP 19 require consideration of the impact of development, where development adjoins a bushland reserve for public open space purposes, as is the case in this instance.

 

In accordance with SEPP 19 (clause 9), the consent authority must not grant consent on land unless it has taken into account:

 

(c)     the need to retain any bushland on the land,

 

(d)     the effect of the proposed development on bushland zoned or reserved for public open space purposes and, in particular, on the erosion of soils, the siltation of streams and waterways and the spread of weeds and exotic plants within the bushland, and

 

(e)     any other matters which, in the opinion of the approving or consent authority, are relevant to the protection and preservation of bushland zoned, or reserved for public open space purposes

 

The bushland areas on site are for the purposes of SEPP 19 urban bushland areas.

 

The Concept Approval assessment and its accompanying conditions placed an important emphasis upon the retention of bushland on site, which required the preparation and implementation of detailed landscape, threatened species, weed, vegetation and bushfire management plans. Having these plans in place for perpetuity will ensure the integrity of the remaining bushland which will adjoin the Edgelea development once completed. In this regard, the development is assessed as satisfying the matters for consideration called up by SEPP 19.

 

State Environmental Planning Policy (Sydney Harbour Catchment) 2005

 

Matters for consideration under SEPP 2005 include biodiversity, ecology and environmental protection, public access to and scenic qualities of foreshores and waterways, maintenance of views, control of boat facilities and maintenance of a working harbour. The proposal is in close proximity to and in view of the Lane Cove river, however, adequate measures have been incorporated into the Concept Approval to ensure that the ecological and biodiversity values of the site are protected and that the scenic quality of the site when viewed from the river is maintained. This includes the protection of significant vegetation upon the site and carefully considered placement of built form.

 

 

 

 

Ku-ring-gai Planning Scheme Ordinance

 

In its declaration as a Major Project and issue of a Concept Approval, the redevelopment of the UTS Ku-ring-gai was also supported by a series of controls and zoning pursuant of SEPP (Major Development) 2005. At the time, the site was declared a State Significant Site. Schedule 3, Part 30 of the SEPP dealt specifically with the UTS Ku-ring-gai site, establishing a series of controls for this site. However, on 21 December 2012, the NSW Department of Planning and Infrastructure approved an amendment to the KPSO which migrated these controls from the SEPP to the KPSO.

 

The following Clauses of the KPSO are relevant to the assessment of the application:

 

26W Application of Part

 

(1)     This Part applies to the land identified on the Land Application Map, referred to in the Part as the UTS Ku-ring-gai Campus site.

(2)     No other provisions of this Ordinance apply to the UTS Ku-ring-gai Campus site.

 

The application has only been considered against the specific controls for the UTS Ku-ring-gai campus site and not the rest of the controls and considerations of the KPSO.

 

26ZH – Subdivision-consent requirements

 

Land within the UTS Ku-ring-gai Campus site maybe subdivided, but only with development consent.

 

Subdivision is being sought, subject to consent being issued, satisfying the requirements of Clause 26ZH.  

 

SEPP (Infrastructure) 2007

 

The UTS Ku-ring-gai site is burdened below ground by a land dedication for the Epping to Chatswood rail line. This rail line is contained within a tunnel that extends up to 90 metres below the surface of the site.

 

Clause 86 of the Infrastructure SEPP requires that where development is proposed within 25 metres (horizontally) of the rail corridor (which is the case in this instance), if excavation associated with the development is to extend 2 metres below ground level, the development is to be referred to Railcorp for its consideration and concurrence.

 

Works associated with the subdivision do not involve excavation below ground level of more than 2m within 25 metres of the rail corridor. In this respect, the development does not trigger referral to Railcorp under the SEPP.

 

Further, the development is otherwise satisfactory with regard to the considerations prompted by the SEPP.

 

Concept Approval MP06_130

 

The function of the Concept Approval is to give in-principle approval for the redevelopment of the UTS Ku-ring-gai site. This approval gives the developer certainty with regards to the redevelopment potential of the site, what portions of the site are developable and what further work needs to be done to realise the development envisaged under the Concept Approval.

 

The Concept Approval requires that the final composition of the development be generally consistent with the terms of the Concept Approval as well as the preparation of specific management plans and further studies, the timing of which is dependant on the delivery of the development.

 

The subdivision of the site at this time essentially prepares the site for development consistent with the Concept Approval, however as it is the first stage of the development, certain conditions of the Concept Approval are to be satisfied with, or prior to the first development application. In this regard, the following conditions of the Concept Approval are relevant:

 

Schedule 2 – Terms of approval and modifications – UTS Ku-ring-gai Campus

 

A1.   Development description

 

(1)     Except as modified by this Consent, Concept Plan approval is granted only to the carrying out of development solely within the Concept Plan area as described in the document titled Preferred Project Report and Statement of Commitments UTS Ku-ring-gai Campus Lindfield, SEPP Major Projects and Concept Plan Volumes 1 and 2 dated February 2008 and prepared by JBA Planning Consultants and DEM Architects.

 

The proposed subdivision creates residential lots consistent with the layout for residential lots shown on the Concept Approval. This application is considered to be in accordance with the terms of Condition A1.

 

A2.   Development in accordance with plans and documentation

 

(1)     Except as modified by this approval, the development shall generally be in accordance with the following plans and documentation (including any appendices therein):

 

(a)     Preferred Project Report and Statement of Commitments UTS Ku-ring-gai Campus Lindfield, SEPP Major Projects and Concept Plan Volumes 1 and 2 dated February 2008 and prepared by JBA Planning Consultants and DEM Architects;

(b)     Modification report by JBA Urban Planning Consultants dated February 2010 and its revised appendices, including University of Technology Sydney Ku-ring-gai Campus State Significant Site Amendment Concept Plan, DEM, April 2010, letter from JBA Urban Planning Consultants dated 24 March 2010 and its attachments; and

(c)     Modification report by JBA Urban Planning Consultants dated 26 July 2011 and its appendices.

 

The application to Council was considered against the plans and associated documentation listed within Condition A2. Of particular note is satisfaction of the proposed development (and application) with the matters specified within the Statement of Commitments. Council‘s assessment of the development against the relevant sections of the Statement of Commitments concludes that the proposal is consistent with the commitments made by the proponent at the time that the Concept Approval was granted. A detailed assessment of the proposed development against the required criteria is provided in Annexure C.

 

B13.        Contributions

 

(1)     The Proponent shall enter into arrangements for the transfer of that land identified in the additional commitments provided by the Proponent by letter dated 13 May 2008 in accordance with those commitments, including:

(a)     a minimum 9,800sqm of land for an adult sized soccer field and curtilage to Council;

(b)     300sqm for a community facility to Council is to be located in the Zone RE1 Public Recreation within the site as agreed with Council; and

(c)     land zoned E1 to DECC

Note: these items will be in lieu of s.94 Contributions in future applications

(2)     The land identified in B13(1)(a),(b) and (c) above is to be transferred to the State or Council (as indicated above) at no cost to Council.

(3)     Arrangements for the transfer of land identified in:

(a)     B13(1)(a) is to occur in accordance with the provisions in the Voluntary Planning Agreement between the landowner and Council;

(b)     B13(1)(b) is to occur in accordance with the provisions in the Voluntary Planning Agreement between the landowner and the Council; and

(c)     B13(1)(c) is to occur prior to or with the first application for development on the site.

(4)     Internal roads must be dedicated to Council, in the event that Council are unwilling to accept this dedication, a positive covenant must be placed on the title of that land to allow public access.

(5)     The dedication referred to in (4) above shall not apply to the internal roads associated with the curtilage of the existing educational establishment, if used for continual educational purposes, as reflected in documentation referred to in condition A2(1)(b) Part A, Schedule 2 of this approval.

 

Council resolved to enter into the required Voluntary Planning Agreement within DA0677/11, on
26 June 2012, and therefore no Section 94 developer contributions will be payable.

 

B14.        Dedication and management of roads

 

(1)     The proponent is to dedicate, in accordance with any Council requirements, the road entrance to the Site from the end of the public road to the sports oval and car parking area and bus stop to allow for public access.

(2)     The dedication referred to in (1) shall be undertaken in accordance with the provision in the Voluntary Planning Agreement between the landowner and the Council.

 

The subdivision proposed in Precinct 1 will depend on private roads, controlled and managed by the associated Community Subdivision. As Council accepted the required dedication of roads as part of DA 0677/11, Condition B14 has already been satisfied and does not form part of this application.

 

Schedule 3 – Future applications

 

A1.   Further approvals and the carrying out of works / activities

 

(1)     Where future development is subject to Part 4 or Part 5 of the Act, the consent authority must only determine future applications for development where they are consistent with the terms of approval of Concept Plan No. 06_0130 as described in Part A of Schedule 1 and subject to the modifications of approval set out in Part A and B of Schedule 2 and 3.

(2)     In accordance with section 75P(2)(a1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, future applications for approval must comply with the following conditions.

 

A2.   Design guidelines

 

(1)     Future development applications are to be in accordance with the design guidelines referred to on page 2 of the revised Statement of Commitments.

 

The proposed subdivision is consistent with the Urban Design Guidelines (UDG’s), the assessment against which is contained further in this report.

 

Edgelea Urban Design Guidelines

 

Condition B1 of the Concept Approval required prior to the first application being determined by Council that the applicant, to Council’s satisfaction, prepared detailed design guidelines to be used to inform and guide the development of the site. The UDG’s have been prepared and adopted by Council. The following assessment against the relevant sections of the UDG’s is provided:

 

2.3.1 Site layout and building controls

 

Controls – Precinct 1

The indicative location of dwelling house types DH1-1 to DH1-3 is shown below in Figure 2.3.1-2. The minimum lot size is to be 583m². The minimum lot frontage is to be 22m excluding corner lots.

 

The subdivision proposes 13 lots as follows –

 

·    10 lots for residential development

·    1 super lot for future residential integrated housing (shown above to be indicatively subdivided)

·    1 lot for the residential flat building approved under DA0270/12

·    1 lot for the private road, servicing the proposed allotments.

 

The submitted subdivision layout for the 13 allotments is consistent with the Edgelea Urban Design Guidelines.

 

With regard to the other controls of Clause 2.3.1, the 10 dwelling house allotments are 583m2 in area and have frontages (where they are not on a street corner) of 22m. The development is therefore assessed as satisfying the applicable parts of the Edgelea Urban Design Guidelines.

 

Process of subdivision:

 

An important note pertinent to this subdivision is that the lot being subdivided, Lot 6, is yet to be formally registered. Lot 6 exists by virtue of the subdivision approved pursuant of DA0677/11, however has not been formally created as it is not registered with the Department of Lands. Until such time that the lot is formally registered (along with the rest of the lots created under DA0677/11), it will be necessary that this application be approved on a deferred commencement basis requiring proof of form registration of Lot 6 prior to the issue of an operational consent, as land cannot be subdivided that is yet to be legally created, despite the lot to be subdivided existing pursuant of a development consent.

 

The reason for this being that prior to a subdivision of land being formally registered with the Department of Lands, all the conditions associated with the subdivision are to be satisfied.

 

Once this occurs and the subdivision is registered, the development consent becomes operable.

 

Subdivision Code

 

The allotments created by this application are consistent with the scope of development that is envisaged under the Concept Approval. The allotment boundaries proposed reflect the different development precincts established under the Concept Approval.

 

The proposed lots will all have access to a private road which has been sized for the likely traffic flows and vehicles likely to access them, including Council’s waste vehicles. The areas of these allotments range from 583m2 for the smallest single residential lot to 4,269 m2 being the super lot for the future integrated housing (which Council will consider separately). It is noted that the proposed lots are less than the minimum lot sizes specified by Council’s Subdivision Code, however, these lots are consistent with the sizes of the lots for the Concept Plan and consistent with the sizing and layout of the UDG’s.

 

Similarly, the environmental considerations prompted by Council’s Subdivision Code have been dealt with extensively within the Major Project Assessment, with the protection and enhancement of the environmentally sensitive areas of the site covered in the many associated management plans.

 

As the subdivision is a ‘paper’ subdivision in that it does not involve any construction or works, no trees are to be removed. Once the lots subject of this subdivision are created, any future development on those lots which requires tree removal will be considered on a case by case basis.

 

The public reserve requirements of Council’s Subdivision Code have been provided for and accommodated as part of the works associated DA0677/11. As that application (required by the Concept Approval), included the construction of a 9,800m2 soccer oval which is dedicated to Council, that oval will serve as a public reserve requirements for the entire UTS redevelopment envisaged by the Concept Plan. In this regard the public reserve requirements of the UDG’s have been satisfied.

 

The development satisfies the requirements of Council’s Subdivision Code.

 

Section 94 Plan

 

Unlike other subdivisions considered by Council, this subdivision or for that matter the entire development does not attract a contribution pursuant of Council’s S94 plan, as the requirements for such are dealt with via Condition B13 of the Concept Approval and the associated Voluntary Planning Agreement (discussed elsewhere in this report). Condition B13 of Concept Approval MP06_0130 states:

 

…..B13.     Contributions

              

(6)     The proponent shall enter into arrangements for the transfer of that land identified in the additional commitments provided by the Proponent by letter dated 13 May 2008 in accordance with those commitments, including:

(a)     a minimum 9,800sqm of land for an adult soccer field and curtilage to Council;

(b)     300sqm for a community facility to Council to be located in the Zone RE1 Public Recreation within the site as agreed with Council, and;

(c)     land zoned E1 to the DECC

 

Note:       These items will be in lieu of s.94 contributions in future applications……

 

(3)  Arrangements for the transfer of land identified in:

(a)     B13(1)(a) is to occur in accordance with the provisions of the Voluntary Planning Agreement between the landowner and the Council;

(b)        B13(b) is to occur in accordance with the provisions in the Voluntary Planning Agreement between the landowner and the Council…..

 

Pursuant to the terms of Condition B13, the appropriate transfer to Council of the required lands has been covered within the associated Voluntary Planning Agreement, which Council resolved to enter into on 26 June 2012. Therefore, the application is not subject to Council’s Contributions Plan.

 

Likely Impacts

 

As the proposed development is a ‘paper subdivision’ with no physical works and as it is generated from the development envisaged under Concept Approval MP06_0130, the proposal is assessed as having an acceptable impact upon the surrounding natural, social, economic and built environments.

 

Suitability of the Site

 

The site is assessed as being suitable for the proposed development, noting the extent of development facilitated pursuant of Concept Approval MP06_0130

 

Public Interest

 

The approval of the proposed subdivision is considered to be in the public interest as discussed in the body of the report.

 

Conclusion

 

Having regard to the provisions of Section 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, the proposed development is considered satisfactory. Therefore, it is recommended that the application be approved.

 

Recommendation:

 

A.       THAT the Council, as the consent authority, grant a deferred development consent to DA0442/12, for the subdivision of proposed Lot 6 into 13 lots, on land at 100 Eton Road, Lindfield, subject to the matters listed in Schedule A  being satisfied within 12 months of a date of determination, and subject to conditions in Schedule B for a period of two (2) years from the date of the satisfaction of Schedule A, consistent with the following:

 

Schedule A: Deferred Commencement - Terms to be satisfied prior to the consent operating

 

The following deferred commencement terms must be complied with to the satisfaction of Council within 12 months of the date of this deferred commencement consent, prior to the issue of an operational development consent:

 

The subdivision created pursuant of DA0677/11 shall be finalised and registered at the Department of Lands. Proof of registration of this subdivision shall be provided to Council prior to the issue of an operational consent.

 

Schedule B: Conditions of development consent

 

1.     Approved architectural plans and documentation (new development)

 

The development must be carried out in accordance with the following plans and documentation listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, except where amended by other conditions of this consent:

 

Plan no.

Drawn by

Dated

Draft Precinct 1 Surveyors Ref: G243-DP2

Peter William Vandergraaf

27.08.2012

 

Document(s)

Dated

Bush fire risk assessment and certification, prepared by Ecological - Precinct 1B only

25 October 2012

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

2.     Inconsistency between documents

 

In the event of any inconsistency between conditions of this consent and the drawings/documents referred to above, the conditions of this consent prevail.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of a Subdivision certificate:

 

3.     Rural Fire Service requirements

 

Asset Protection Zones

 

The intent of measures is to provide sufficient space and maintain reduced fuel

loads so as to ensure radiant heat levels of buildings are below critical limits and to

prevent direct flame contact with a building. To achieve this, the following conditions

shall apply:

 

1.       At the issue of subdivision certificate and in perpetuity the entire property shall be managed as an inner protection area (IPA) as outlined within section 4.1.3 and Appendix 5 of 'Planning for Bush Fire Protection 2006' and the NSW Rural Fire Service's document 'Standards for asset protection zones,'

 

Reason:       Statutory requirement.

 

4.     Easement for waste collection

 

Prior to issue of the Subdivision Certificate, an easement for waste collection is to be created under Section 88B of the Conveyancing Act 1919. This is to permit legal access for Council, Council’s contractors and their vehicles over the subject property for the purpose of collecting waste from the property.  The terms of the easement are to be generally in accordance with Council’s draft terms for an easement for waste collection and shall be to the satisfaction of Council’s Development Engineer.

 

Reason:         To permit legal access for Council, Council’s contractors and their vehicles over the subject site for waste collection.

 

5.     Sydney Water Section 73 Compliance Certificate

 

Prior to release of the linen plan/issue of the subdivision certificate, the Section 73 Sydney Water compliance certificate which refers to the subdivision application must be obtained and submitted to the Council.

 

Reason:        Statutory requirement.

 

6.     Provision of services

 

Prior to issue of the Subdivision Certificate, separate underground electricity, gas and phone or appropriate conduits for the same, must be provided to each allotment to the satisfaction of the utility provider. A suitably qualified and experienced engineer or surveyor is to provide certification that all new lots have ready underground access to the services of electricity, gas and phone. Alternatively, a letter from the relevant supply authorities stating the same may be submitted to satisfy this condition.

 

Reason:         Access to public utilities.

 

7.     Issue of Subdivision Certificate

 

The Subdivision Certificate must not be issued until all conditions of development consent have been satisfied.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development is completed prior to transfer of responsibility for the site and development to another person.

 

8.     Submission of 88b instrument

 

Prior to the issue of the Subdivision Certificate, the applicant must submit an original instrument under Section 88B of the Conveyancing Act with the plan of subdivision, plus six (6) copies to Council. Ku-ring-gai Council must be named as the authority whose consent is required to release, vary or modify the burdens.

 

Reason:         To create all required easements, rights-of-carriageway, positive covenants, restrictions-on-use or other burdens/benefits as may be required.

 

9.     Submission of plans of subdivision

 

For endorsement of the subdivision certificate, the applicant shall submit an original plan of subdivision plus 6 copies, suitable for endorsement by Council. The following details must be submitted with the plan of subdivision and its copies:

 

a)     the endorsement fee current a the time of lodgement

b)     the 88B instrument plus 6 copies

c)     a copy of the Occupation Certificate issued for DA0677/11

d)     all surveyor’s and/or consulting engineers’ certification(s) required under this subdivision consent

e)     The Section 73 (Sydney Water) Compliance Certificate for the subdivision.

 

Council will check the consent conditions on the subdivision. Failure to submit the required information will delay endorsement of the linen plan and may require payment of rechecking fees. Plans and copies of subdivision must not be folded. Council will not accept bonds in lieu of completing subdivision works.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

10.   General easement/R.O.W. provision and certification

 

Prior to issue of the Subdivision Certificate, a registered surveyor is to provide details to Council that all physical structures are fully contained within the proposed allotments or will be fully covered by the proposed burdens upon registration of the final plan of subdivision.  Alternatively, where the surveyor is of the opinion that creation of burdens and benefits is not required, then proof to this effect must be submitted to Council.

 

This condition includes the interallotment stormwater drainage easement along the rear of Lots 5 to 11.

 

Reason:         To ensure that all physical structures are fully contained within the proposed allotments or will be fully covered by the proposed burdens upon registration of the final plan of subdivision.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adam Richardson

Executive Assessment Officer

 

 

 

 

Selwyn Segall

Team Leader - Development Assessment North

 

 

 

 

Corrie Swanepoel

Manager Development Assessment Services

 

 

 

 

Michael Miocic

Director Development & Regulation

 

 

Attachments:

A1View

A1 - Zoning Extract

 

2012/309183

 

A2View

A2 - Public Opinion

 

2012/309179

 

A3View

B - Concept Approval

 

2012/147981

 

A4View

C - Statement of Commitments

 

2012/308526

 

A5View

D - Plan of Subdivision

 

2013/004706

  


APPENDIX No: 1 - A1 - Zoning Extract

 

Item No: GB.9

 


APPENDIX No: 2 - A2 - Public Opinion

 

Item No: GB.9

 


APPENDIX No: 3 - B - Concept Approval

 

Item No: GB.9

 











APPENDIX No: 4 - C - Statement of Commitments

 

Item No: GB.9

 

 

Assessment Statement of Commitments                                                                          

Response

Satisfactory

1.1

Planning Agreements.  A Voluntary Planning Agreement (VPA) will be negotiated that addresses the current plans to offset section 94 contributions by the provision of the soccer field and the community space which can accommodate a child care centre.

DHA and Ku-ring-gai Council have agreed to terms and prepared a draft Voluntary Planning Agreement under DA0677/11.

Y

1.2

Ecological Sustainable Development

Any proposed dwellings within the site will comply with BASIX requirements for water conservation and thermal and energy efficiency.

N/A

N/A

Staging

Consideration will need to be given to the staging and delivery of the development of the Concept Plan.  The staging of the development components will need to have regard to:

§ Minimisation of construction impacts upon adjoining properties;

§ Protection of existing public benefits and access;

§ Construction access; and

§ Timing of infrastructure provision.

A detailed project staging plan will be submitted with the first project application.

The Concept Staging Plan has been provided to Council, under DA0677/11. This commitment is satisfied.

 

Y

Built Form 

§ Floor to ceiling heights will be limited to 3.5 metres.

§ Urban design guidelines will be developed for single lots, integrated lots, and residential flat buildings prior to the first stage of development, to be outlined in the project staging plan to be submitted with the first project application.

N/A

N/A

1.3

Contamination

§ A hazardous material audit which will include sampling and identification of asbestos and Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) will be completed to determine the extent and integrity of the hazardous building materials which exist on the site;

§ Any demolition/removal of Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) and asbestos containing material will be conducted in accordance with current NSW EPA waste classification and disposal guidelines, and WorkCover occupation health and safety procedures:

§ At the project or development application stage, a limited and targeted Phase 2 intrusive contamination assessment at the northern property boundary will be undertaken to assess whether any contamination, from potentials sources identified on the Film Australia site, has migrated onto the UTS property. This would involve the drilling and collection of soil samples as the installation of ground water wells. In addition, limited surface soil sampling will be conducted across the sports oval and any other sporting fields which may have been treated with organochlorine/ organophosphate pesticides. The results of Phase 2 soil and groundwater investigation will be assessed against the relevant land use criteria stated by NSW EPA, NEPM and ANZECC guidelines. If concentrations of contaminants exceed the relevant land use guideline a remedial action plan will be developed, with remediation and validation works completed in accordance with NSW EPA guidelines, CLM Act (1997) and SEPP 55.

 

This commitment was considered and addressed under DA0677/11. It is taken that contamination investigations required by the Statement of Commitments has been sufficiently satisfied, with the site not identified as not being contaminated.

Y

1.4

Flora and Fauna

Flora and Fauna Indirect impacts on bushland such as weeds, feral and domestic animals and fire will be managed by the implementation of management plans and strategies including:

§ A Threatened Species Management Plan that will address:

o   Feral and domestic management strategies to minimise habitats post construction for feral animals and restrictions and controls for domestic cats and dogs

o   Retention of areas of native vegetation and habitat for threatened flora and fauna within the site, including retention of D. biflora plants and habitat;

o   Fencing and flagging of all D. biflora plants to be retained within the development area. A minimum of two D.biflora habitats will be retained to the east and west of the village green. Any D.biflora habitats located in the APZ will be managed accordingly ;

o   Translocation of soil and seeds from D.biflora habitat where this will be impacted by the development area.  Translocation will be detailed within a plan prior to any works beginning on the site;

o   A monitoring program will be developed to ensure the viability of the D.biflora and determine the success of translocation of seeds

§ A Weed Management Plan will be prepared as part of project applications to link into storm water control strategies.

§ An Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan will be developed to address both the construction phase and subdivision phase to ensure erosion and sedimentation controls will be put in place prior to any works beginning to ensure that any potential increase in runoff from removal of vegetation or leaf litter does not impact on downstream or off-site environments and development does not contribute to environmental damage of the waterways, bushland or air quality

§ A Vegetation Management Plan for the site that will address:

o   Retention and protection of trees, particularly hollow bearing trees within the development area where possible;

o   Retention of existing understorey vegetation within landscaped areas.  These pockets will be rehabilitated as required to remove exotic species and enhance native shrubs and ground covers;

o   Pre-clearance surveys will be conducted by ecologists to ensure all fauna are removed prior to clearance and ecologists on site during all vegetation clearance activities to capture any displaced fauna;

o   Harvesting of seed banks for the purposes of on-site regeneration.  Greening Australia would be consulted regarding the best way to salvage soil seeds and canopy held seeds.  These could be used in landscaping or regeneration of disturbed bushland areas adjacent to developed areas.

o   All riparian corridors will be protected and maintained

o   The Red Crowned Toadlet breeding habitat and surrounding habitat will be protected and managed

o   Fencing during construction of all areas of native vegetation that will not be removed for development, as protection from machinery and personnel;

§ Before future residents move in, information packages detailing the environmental sensitivity of the site including information on the threatened species and habitats will be provided to ensure greater awareness and involvement.

§ In addition, no activities will be undertaken within DECC land.

§ All non-APZ bushland on the site, south west of the 50 metre APZ will be dedicated to DECC with their approval, and will be initiated with the approval of the first Project or Development Application.

 

The commitments concerning flora and fauna were considered and addressed as part of DA0677/11. The scope of works proposed as part of this application are assessed as being consistent with the management plans required under the flora and fauna commitments.

 

Y

1.5

Trees

A Landscape Management Plan for the site that will address:

§ Retention or replacement of planting around the oval

§ Long term preservation and maintenance of tree assets

§ Retention and maintenance of planting along the entry road from Eton Road

§ Retention of the planted retaining wall between the existing oval and tennis courts retained.

 

The landscape management plan was provided and approved under DA0677/11. The works associated with this application are assessed as being consistent with the landscape management plan.

 

Y

1.6

Infrastructure

§ A comprehensive infrastructure delivery plan will be prepared to ensure that the site can be adequately serviced with all utility services including gas, electricity, water, sewer and telecommunications, etc.  The Plan will demonstrate that:

o   Sewer infrastructure will be augmented to service the new development

o   Gas, Power and Potable water will be augmented where required to meet the requirements of new development

§ A comprehensive stormwater management plan will be prepared which addresses

o   Water flow;

o   Water quality;

o   Water catchments;

o   Water conservation;

o   Water retention; and

o   Water treatment and re-use.

§ Above ground swales are to be constructed and vegetated with native species and indigenous flora conserved wherever possible

§ Water detention areas are to be provided within the development area

§ Cut and fill will be balanced across the site, any fill that is required will be clean fill

 

An infrastructure delivery plan and stormwater management plan were submitted and approved as part of DA0677/11. The proposed development is assessed as being consistent with these plans, noting that the capture and disposal of stormwater generated by the lots being created by this development has been included as part of the civil works associated with DA0677/11.

 

Y

1.7

Bushfire

§ All development on the site will be carried out in accordance with the Planning for Bushfire guidelines.

§ An APZ to be incorporated and maintained, as per the requirements of the Planning for Bushfire Protection Guidelines 2006, and the recommendations of the consultant report prepared by Barry Eadie Consulting;

§ An APZ of a minimum width of 50 metre will be maintained between the south-east edge of the existing building and the north-west edge of the site;

§ An APZ of a minimum width of 60 metres is to be maintain to the east of the residential development, to the north east of the site.

§ Detailed management practices will be outlined in a Bushfire Management Plan including management practices within the APZ prior to occupation of the site

§ Detailed Fire Emergency/ Evacuation plan will be developed prior to occupation of the site

§ The existing fire trail will be upgraded to meet Planning for Bushfire Protection Guidelines 2006 and will be extended to connect with proposed residential development to the NW to provide adequate access for fire fighting and management procedures

§ Prior to any clearance for the Asset Protection Zone (APZ) and fire trail creation, a survey will be conducted to identify any hollow bearing trees or trees considered to provide important fauna habitat.  Such trees will be flagged and locations recorded with a GPS and mapped.  These trees will be avoided.

§ Small shrubs and ground cover to 50cm will be retained within the APZ.  Large shrubs can be retained in vegetation clumps where they will not result in fore spreading to tree canopies;

§ Rocky outcrops and rock will be avoided by the fire trail.  No rock will be removed from the APZ or fire trail areas; and

§ Wooden bridges will be built over the drainage lines for construction of the fire trail so that these environments are not disturbed

§ Significant trees will be retained within the development area where possible and all trees will be retained in the APZ.

§ All D.biflora will be flagged and locations recoded with a GPS and protected.  A map and works plan will then be devised prior to any vegetation clearance or modification for the APZ creation.  Areas within the APZ where soil seed banks or plants could be translocated will also be investigated and identified prior to any works beginning;

§ Construction of all buildings will be Level 3 construction

 

A Bushfire Management Plan has been provided to Council as part of DA0677/11. This report has also been provided to the RFS, who have accepted the plan.

 

The submitted plan however is not strictly consistent with the commitments listed in the adjoining column. This is due in part to changes in Planning for Bushfire 2006, and in part to an alternate strategy for the management of bushfire on the Edgelea site.

 

Council has referred the situation to the Director-General of the Department of Planning and Infrastructure for their concurrence. The Department confirmed by correspondence dated 28 May 2012 that bushfire management was consistent with the Concept Approval and associated statement of commitments.

 

This application has been supported by a bushfire plan and certificate as required by S79BA of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979. This has been referred to the RFS under S.100B of the Rural Fires Act 1997, who pursuant of this report have issued concurrence to the development.

 

Y

1.8

Transport

§ A minimum of 320 car-parking spaces to be retained for the adaptive re-use of the existing building.

§ Car-parking for the reuse of the existing building will be fully assessed in the future Project Application;

§ Retention of existing access and bus turnaround loop to ensure public transport services are retained

§ A Sustainable Transport Plan will be prepared at the Project (or Development) Application Stage which examines methods to promote the use of non-motorised and public transport to access the site for the reuse of the main campus building. This could include the development of Transport Behavioural Program to be distributed to future residents to encourage objectives outlined in the Sustainable Transport Plan.

 

The existing building is not located within the Edgelea site. It is therefore the responsibility of UTS (or the body responsible for the use of the existing buildings) to provide the necessary car parking for the future adaptive re-use of the existing building should it occur. The car parking for the reuse of the building will be assessed as part of the Development Application for the use of the building. It is noted that the statement of commitments do not envisage a situation whereby the University continues to operate while its surplus areas are redeveloped in accordance with the Concept Approval.

The existing access and bus turnaround loop have been retained within the site. This matter was covered in DA0677/11.

The TMAP has been provided to Council as required, under DA0677/11. No further action is required in this regard.

 

N/A

 

 

 

Y

1.9

Heritage

§ A copy of UTS Kuring-Gai, Rezoning Application Indigenous Heritage Issues Report prepared by Jo McDonald Cultural Heritage Management Pty Ltd will be made available to Metropolitan Local Aboriginal Land Council and three copies to Cultural Heritage Division of the Sydney Zone of the Department of Environment and Climate Change.

§ The Metropolitan Local Aboriginal Land Council will be requested to monitor surface works during initial construction phase and promoted the adaptive reuse of the main building is to respect the architectural integrity and quality and not adversely effect the significance of the building including retention of external materials

§ Any future use of the building is to be in accordance with the Heritage Impact Assessment, as well as the Conservation Strategy for the site, prepared by Graham Brooks and Associates, heritage consultants.

§ Original light fittings will be retained and upgraded

§ Planter boxes on roof terraces will be recovered and maintained, where possible

§ Interim heritage listing of the Site to be progressed.

§ Further recognise the architectural and heritage values of main campus of UTS complex on the National Trust Register.

§ Any archaeological findings will be referred to Heritage Office.

 

 

Copies of the UTS Ku-ring-gai, Rezoning Application Indigenous Heritage Issues Report prepared by Jo McDonald Cultural Heritage Management Pty Ltd have been provided to the Local Aboriginal land Council and the DECC as part of DA0677/11.


The Metropolitan Local Aboriginal Land Council will be requested to monitor surface works during the initial construction phase, this will be reinforced through the conditions of consent.

 

Noted. The existing UTS buildings are not located within the subject site.


Noted. The existing UTS buildings are now listed as a heritage item.

 

Noted.

 

Y

1.10

Geotechnical

§ A detailed geotechnical investigation will be submitted with the first Project Application.

A detailed geotechnical investigation has been provided to Council. The investigation concludes that the site is suitable for the proposed redevelopment but recommends further detailed studies be done for the future residential development. The subject DA has been supported by a further Geotechnical study which demonstrates that the area of the Edgelea site to be development is suitable for the intended purpose.

Y

1.11

Community Facilities

§ A full-size adult soccer field that is capable of accommodating either two junior cricket fields or two junior soccer fields will be provided and dedicated to Council.

§ Use of the playing field will be consistent with other playing fields in the Ku-ring-gai local government area to ensure uses are compatible and conflicts do not arise.

§ Council will be responsible for the maintenance of the playing field to the current standard and provision of appropriate facilities.

 

These matters are covered within the VPA associated with DA0677/11.

Y

 

 

 

 


APPENDIX No: 5 - D - Plan of Subdivision

 

Item No: GB.9

 


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 5 February 2013

GB.10 / 193

 

 

Item GB.10

DA0385/12

 

22 January 2013

 

 

development application

 

 

Summary Sheet

 

Report title:

9 Wonga Wonga Street, Turramurra - demolish existing dwelling and construct a development containing 10 self care apartments over basement parking - SEPP (Housing for Seniors or People with A Disability) 2004

ITEM/AGENDA NO:

GB.10

 

 

AApplication No:

DA0385/12

Property Details:

99 Wonga Wonga Street Turramurra

Lot & DP No:      Lot 3 DP 554061

Site area (m2):   3320sqm

Zoning:               Residential 2(c2)

Ward:

Wahroonga

Proposal/Purpose:

Demolish existing dwelling and construct a development containing 10 self care apartments over basement parking – SEPP (Housing for Seniors or People with A Disability) 2004.

Type of Consent:

Local

Applicant:

W R L Property Group Pty Ltd

Owner:

Mrs H E Wood

Date Lodged:

13 September 2012

Recommendation:

Approval.

 

 

  

 


Purpose of Report

 

To determine Development Application No.0385/12, for demolition of existing dwelling and construction of a development containing 10 self care apartments over basement parking - SEPP (Housing for Seniors or People with A Disability) 2004 (SEPP SL) on land at 9 Wonga Wonga Street, Turramurra.

 

Executive Summary

 

Issues:                                                 East side setback, access to bus stop and impact on street trees

 

Submissions:                                     Original application: 4 submissions

                                                              Amended application: 1 submission

 

Land & Environment Court Appeal:           No

 

Recommendation:                            Approval

 

History

 

Site history:

 

The site has a history of low density residential use.

 

Development application history:

 

10 August 2012

PREDA00/12

 

A pre-DA Meeting was held for a SEPP SL development at 9 Wonga Wonga Street, Turramurra.  Issues discussed at the meeting included:

 

-     rear 25% calculation

-     front setback analysis

-     east side boundary treatment (provision of boundary planting)

-     east side setback to Unit 10 (insufficient separation to provide complementary boundary planting)

-     fence treatment

-     scale (relationship of building to existing ground level and 2 storey requirement)

-     heritage impacts

-     tree impacts

-     landscape design

-     accessibility information requirements

-     water management

-     waste management

-     traffic, access and parking

-     geotechnical investigation

 

13 September 2012

DA0385/12 lodged.

 

28 September 2012

Notification commenced. 

 

An application status letter was sent to the applicant.  Additional information was requested including BASIX Certificate, Heritage Impact Statement and Landscape Plans. 

 

3 October 2012

BASIX Certificate lodged.

 

16 October 2012

Landscape plans lodged.

 

19 October 2012

Heritage Impact Statement lodged.

 

20 November 2012

A preliminary assessment letter was  sent to the applicant raising the following issues: landscaping (landscape plan, BASIX, deep soil, treatment to east side setback, common open space, access to bus stop and impact on street trees); setback to basement; font setback analysis; area/height calculations; accessibility to a public bus stop, pathway gradients; provision for plant equipment.

 

30 November 2012

Council officers met with the applicant to discuss issues contained in the preliminary assessment letter.

 

11 December 2012

Amended plans and documentation submitted.

 

17 December 2012

Notification of amended application commenced.

 

 

Rezoning history:

 

9 Wonga Wonga Street Turramurra was zoned Residential 2(c) under the provisions of the KPSO when it was gazetted on 1 October 1971.  The site was then rezoned to Residential 2(c2) under the provisions of the KPSO by the amending instrument LEP 194 on 28 May 2004.

 

The application was lodged on 13 September 2012 under the provisions of the Ku-ring-gai Planning Scheme Ordinance and Draft Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan (Local Centres 2012), where the site is zoned R2 Low Density Residential.

 

On 25 January 2012, the Ku-ring-gai Local Centres Plan was published in the NSW government Gazette.  The plan takes effect on 8 February 2013 (14 days after it is published on the NSW legislation website). 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THE SITE AND SURROUNDING AREA

 

The site:

 

Visual character study category:

Pre 1920

Easements/rights of way:

No

Heritage Item:

No

Heritage conservation area:

Within National Trust Urban Conservation Area No.20

In the vicinity of a heritage item:

Nos 1, 8, 12, 17, 26, 28, 24, 31, 37, 43, 44, 51, 54, 55, 60, 61, 70, 73 & 77 Ku-ring-gai Avenue, Turramurra

No 2 Nulla Nulla Avenue, Turramurra

Nos 7,35,39,41 & 47 Warrangi Street, Turramurra

 

Bush fire prone land:

No

Endangered species:

No

Urban bushland:

No

Contaminated land:

No

 

The site is located on the southern (high) side of Wonga Wonga Street, between Turramurra Avenue and Ku-ring-gai Avenue, Turramurra.  The site is irregular in shape (“L” shape configuration) with a frontage of 39.625m and a depth of 72.1m, the total site area is 3320sqm.  The site slopes from the rear south-east corner (RL175.89) to the front north-east corner (RL169), at an average gradient of 7.65%.

 

Existing development on the site includes a two storey dwelling house, swimming pool and tennis court.

 

Surrounding development:

 

The surrounding development includes single and two storey dwelling houses.

 

The Proposal

 

The application proposes a redevelopment of the site for a SEPP Seniors Living Development containing 10 self care apartments.  In detail the proposal involves:

 

·    demolition of the existing dwelling house, swimming pool, tennis court on the site

 

·    construction of 3 buildings (Block A, Block B and Block C) to accommodate 10 x 3 bedroom units with associated basement parking

 

·    Block A (frontage to Wonga Wonga Road) is a two storey building and would contain 5 x 3 bedroom units

·    Block B (to the rear of Block A) is a two storey building and would contain 4 x 3 bedroom units

 

·    Block C (to the rear south-east corner of the site) is a single storey building and would contain 1 x 3 bedroom unit.

 

·    the basement parking provides for a total of 22 residential spaces and 2 visitor spaces, the vehicular access ramp is located to the north-west corner of the site

 

·    the development incorporates 3 lifts which provide access from the basement to the residential levels above

 

·    mechanical plant including air conditioning, is located within the basement of the development

 

·    pedestrian access is provided adjacent to the east side boundary of the site

 

·    associated landscape and stormwater works

 

Consultation

 

Community

 

Notification of the original application

 

In accordance with Development Control Plan No. 56, owners of surrounding properties were given notice of the application. In response, submissions from the following were received

 

1.   Sean Li and Yan Chen, 10 Wonga  Wonga Street, Turramurra

2.   Claire V Wilkins, 8 Wonga Wonga Street, Turramurra

3.   NJ Evans, 32 Warrangi Street, Turramurra

4.   John Jabour, 4 Wonga Wonga Street, Turramurra

 

The submissions raised the following issues:

 

Visitor parking

 

According to the SEPP, visitor parking is not required. Notwithstanding, the development proposes 2 visitor spaces and also an additional 5 resident off-street parking spaces. No further parking requirements can be imposed.

 

Parking along Wonga Wonga Street

 

Parking conditions along the street are already limited due to the demand for commuter parking. A condition is recommended requiring that a work zone be obtained along the site frontage for the set down and pick up of materials (Condition 10).  Employee parking is to be made available on site when possible. 

 

 

 

 

Footpath access

 

A condition is recommended requiring that a footpath be constructed on the opposite side of the road down to the intersection of Wonga Wonga Street and Ku-ring-gai Avenue where there is the existing bitumen footpath. An accessible footpath to the bus stop is required under Clause 26 of the Seniors Living SEPP (Condition 36).

 

Overdevelopment of the site, excessive scale

 

The development is one to two storeys in scale and complies with the height and floor space area requirements under SEPP SL.

 

The development will dominate the streetscape and is out of character with the surrounding area

 

The applicant has provided a detailed site analysis in addition to a front setback analysis which demonstrates that adequate consideration has been provided for the existing streetscape character and that the proposal does not result in an unreasonable impact when viewed from Wonga Wonga Street and neighboring properties. 

 

Traffic, carparking, access and safety impacts during construction

 

Standard construction management conditions are recommended to address these issues (Condition 9, 10 and 36).

 

The proposal will diminish the amenity and value of surrounding properties

 

The amended scheme results in a development which maintains the existing amenity and environmental character of its surrounds. 

 

Impact on heritage

 

Council’s Heritage Advisor is satisfied that the development will not result in an unreasonable impact on the adjoining heritage item at 44 Ku-ring-gai Road or any other items in vicinity of the site.

 

Unsatisfactory access to services and lack of public transportation

Pedestrian accessibility and adequacy of footpath from the site to a bus stop

 

The amended proposal includes plans and documentation which demonstrate that satisfactory access is provided to a public bus stop in Boomerang Street (300-330m from the site) and that the bus stop is regularly serviced by Bus Route 577 which travels to and from Turramurra Shopping Centre and Railway Station.  The application satisfies the requirements of SEPP SL in this regard.

 

Waste management and amenity impacts

 

The garbage storage area is located within the basement.  Council’s Development Engineer is satisfied with the method of waste management and that the proposal does not result in unreasonable amenity impacts in this regard.

 

Notification of the amended application

 

In accordance with Development Control Plan No. 56, owners of surrounding properties were given notice of the amended application. In response, one submission was received from:

 

1.   Sean Li, 10 Wonga  Wonga Street, Turramurra

 

The submission raised the following issue:

 

Potential impacts to street trees fronting the development site

 

Council’s Landscape and Tree Assessment Officer has reviewed this issue and to preserve the condition of all tress within Council’s Road Reserve in the vicinity of the development site has required that an arborist assessment be submitted to Council (Condition 36).

 

Within Council

 

Heritage

 

Council's Heritage Advisor commented on the proposal as follows:

 

Heritage status –

 

The subject site is not identified as a heritage item.  The site adjoins a heritage item at No 44 Ku-ring-gai Avenue and there are a large number of heritage items within the vicinity of the site including the following:

 

-     Nos. 1, 8, 12, 17, 26, 28, 24, 31, 37, 43, 51, 54, 55, 60, 61, 70, 73 & 77 Ku-ring-gai Avenue.

·    No 2 Nulla Nulla Avenue.

 

·    Nos 7, 35, 39, 41 & 47 Warrangi Street.

 

Clause 61 E of the KPSO requires Council to assess and consider impacts of development on the heritage significance of heritage items and their setting within the vicinity of the site.  

 

The heritage item at No 44 Ku-ring-gai Avenue is a large two storey item that formerly extended to Wonga Wonga Street.  From the 1943 aerial photograph, it appears that the whole of the subject site was part of No 44 and the existing tennis court at No 9 Wonga Wonga Street was part of a formal garden to No 44 Ku-ring-gai Avenue.  There may have been a tennis court further to the west of the house, roughly in the current location of No 9 Wonga Wonga Street.  Further research may reveal that the paddocks further to the west in Wonga Wonga Street may also have been part of the property at No 44 Ku-ring-gai Avenue.

 

The subject site adjoins a draft HCA in draft LEP Town Centres.  The draft LEP was finalised at a Council meeting in July 2012 and its gazettal is considered imminent and certain.

 

 

 

 

 

The following is the statement of significance of the draft HCA:

 

The Ku-ring-gai Avenue Heritage Conservation Area is of historic significance as one of the most prestigious Federation period streets in the Sydney metropolitan area, which evidences the lifestyles of Sydney society’s elite in the period from the 1890s to the 1920s. 

 

Ku-ring-gai Avenue is of aesthetic significance as one of the most prestigious Federation period streets in Sydney.  It derives its fine aesthetic qualities from its collection of grand, frequently architect designed Federation period residences set in generous and well- proportioned garden settings which blend into the mature Brush Box avenue street planting.

 

The following management recommendations in the heritage report that supports the application are relevant to this application:

 

·    ensure a landscape buffer is provided to adjacent sites outside the HCA

·    retain and conserve significant historic planting and trees

 

Heritage Impact Statement

 

The applicant has provided a well considered HIS prepped by an experienced heritage consultant.  It concludes:

 

“The proposal would increase the density of land use on the subject allotment with no impact on how the adjunct heritage item is seen from the public domain.  The adjacent heritage item has been landscaped to protect its own privacy it no longer addresses its former lands.  The proposal has been carefully scaped with a single-storey detached dwelling on the land closest to the heritage item, and two storey development set on lower land further away to cause minimal impact on views from the heritage item.  All of the habitable space in the proposed development would have no impact on how the setting of the heritage item is seen from the public domain.”

 

Comments

 

The existing house and tennis court are not considered to have any heritage values that would prevent demolition.  It all appears to be post 1960s development that occurred after subdivision of the adjoining heritage item at No 44 Ku-ring-gai Avenue.  Photographic archival recording of the site and existing house before demolition occurs is required in any future approval.

 

The draft HCA and nearby heritage items are characterised by predominantly large houses on large lots with a predominance of Brush Box street trees and established plantings in broad garden settings.

 

The SEPP requires any proposed development should …”retain, complement and sensitively harmonise with any heritage conservation areas in the vicinity and any nearby heritage items”.

 

The proposed development of 3 contemporary styled apartment buildings over a basement car park will have minor impact on the adjoining heritage item as the site slopes down to the west from the item and the nearest building (Block C) is single storey and below the floor level of the heritage item.  It would not obscure views to the west from the rear of the item.  The other nearby heritage items would not be affected by the proposed development.  It is considered that the proposed development would have minimal impacts on the draft HCA. 

 

It is noted that proposed Block C is single storey and is close to the boundary of the adjoining heritage item.  Given the fall in levels between the rear of the heritage item and the subject site, a retaining wall will most likely be required, which can limit the future development of screen planting to screen the new development from the heritage item.   Comment should be sought from Landscape Services on the success of the proposed screen planting on the subject site as the heritage item is located close to its rear boundary.  Also there should be considerable landscape screening between Blocks A, B & C on the site.

 

The existing site at No 9 Wonga Wonga Street is of considerable size and its width will enable substantial side setbacks for any new development on the site.  As indicated the western setback of Building A is 5562mm and the eastern setback is 3677mm.  This setback should allow sufficient retention of screen planting and the design should allow the proposed building to read as a single residence in the streetscape rather that a residential flat building.  The proposed front setback of 14000mm is relatively generous, however the proposed terrace areas intrude into this setback area and will potentially impact on its understanding as a relatively large residential building in an area of large houses set in generous gardens. 

 

The proposed basement parking area and driveway will also tend to make the new development read as a residential flat building rather that a large residential building.  The Seniors Living Policy Urban Design guideline recommends the following where basement parking is proposed:

 

·    minimise the impact of the entry by reducing the width where possible to single vehicle width rather than double;

·    locating it to one side of the site, not at the centre where it is visually prominent

·    recessing it from the main building façade;

·    providing garage doors to avoid the appearance of a ‘black hole’ in the streetscape; and

·    returning façade materials into the visible area of the car park entry.

 

Materials and colours in this area should generally follow the predominant materials and colours in the area including face brickwork predominantly reds and browns, stone bases, terra cotta roofs or slate and limit the use of rendered and painted surfaces to achieve an acceptable context with the adjoining heritage item and draft HCA. 

 

The elevations appear to be relatively contemporary but are restrained.  This design approach is considered acceptable in the context of the nearby heritage items and draft HC provided compatible colours and materials are chosen.

 

The existing property has a minimal metal palisade type front fence and its boundaries are dominated by plantings rather than solid fences or edges.  It is recommended to retain open and achieve privacy by plantings.  Any entry structures should be minimal and limited to simple letter box structures.

 

Planning comment: There is no fencing proposed on the front boundary of the site.  The front setback features landscape plantings which complement the streetscape.  A 1.5m timber private courtyard fence is associated with ground level Units 1 and 2 of Block A (fronting Wonga Wonga Street).  The private courtyard fencing is set back 7-8 metres from the front boundary.  Having regard to landscaping forward of the private court yard fencing, the presentation of the development to Wonga Wonga Street is acceptable.

 

Any footpath required within the road reserve for access provisions should generally match the existing footpaths in Ku-ring-gai Avenue which is asphalt. 

 

Conclusions and recommendations

 

The proposed scheme is considered to have minor impact on the adjoining and nearby heritage items and draft HCA.  The scheme is considered acceptable on heritage grounds.

 

It is recommended to record the existing site to archival standards and require a colour scheme/materials board prior to issue of a Construction Certificate.  The materials and colours should generally follow the predominant materials and colours in the area including face brickwork predominantly reds and browns, stone bases, terra cotta roofs or slate and limit the use of rendered and painted surfaces. 

 

Landscaping

 

Council's Landscape and Tree Assessment Officer commented on the proposal as follows:

 

Site characteristics

The site is characterised by an established landscape setting with mature trees and shrubs within formal garden beds and grassed expanses. The site is dominated at the rear by a row planting of mature Lophostemon confertus (Queensland Brushbox) located adjacent to the rear site boundary.

 

Tree impacts

The proposed development will result in the removal of numerous trees across the site. Two trees of high landscape significance are proposed to be removed including, T26, a mature Lophostemon confertus (Queensland Brushbox) located adjacent to the site frontage which is required to be removed to accommodate the proposed driveway, and T2 Melia azadarach (White Cedar) centrally located on site, which spatially conflicts with the proposed building.

 

The proposed tree removal can be supported on landscape grounds as the most visually significant and healthy trees located on site are proposed to be retained with adequate setbacks to ensure their ongoing health.

 

Landscape plan/tree replenishment

 

Tennis court fence

The development proposes the retention of the existing tennis court fence adjacent to the northern site boundary. As the proposal deletes the tennis court, the fencing will serve no further purpose. It is required that the fence be removed. Screen planting proposed will maintain privacy and resident amenity (Condition 20).

 

Tree replenishment

Six existing canopy trees are proposed to be retained. At a minimum an additional three to six canopy trees capable of attaining a minimum height of 13.0m to maintain and enhance the treed landscape character is required. A further 11 canopy trees have been provided.

 

Eastern side setback

With the increased scale of the development proposal it is recommended that the eastern side setback allow sufficient landscape area for the inclusion of small ornamental trees to visually reduce the bulk of the new building. This can be conditioned.

 

Stormwater plan

The proposed stormwater/drainage works are acceptable on landscape grounds.

 

BASIX

The BASIX certificate correctly describes the proposal.

 

Deep soil

By the applicant’s calculations, the proposed deep soil area is 1232.76sqm or 37.13% of the site, which is in excess of the minimum SEPP requirement for 15% of the site area. At least 10% of the deep soil zone is located at the rear of the site.

 

The development is in compliance with the minimum deep soil area as defined by the SEPP.

 

Landscape area

The proposal complies with the requirement for 30% landscaped area of the site.

 

Screening to heritage items

The proposal provides screen planting of Murraya paniculata, which has a mature height of 3-4 metres, to the single storey Block C along the eastern boundary of the subject site adjoining the heritage item. In addition to the hedge planting, a group of trees are proposed adjacent the heritage item, in the north-west corner of Block C.  Additional planting of small ornamental trees within the eastern setback of Block A has been conditioned. It is considered that the retention of the existing significant trees along the southern boundary of the site and the proposed landscape treatment of the front setback and between the buildings, is in keeping with the garden character of the draft heritage conservation area.

 

Neighbourhood access to bus stops

The development proposes the construction of pedestrian footpaths within the road reserves of Wonga Wonga St and Boomerang St. Generally, no objection is raised regarding the proposed footpaths if they are constructed on top of existing grade.

 

It is noted that the existing Ulmus parvifolia (Chinese Elm) located adjacent to the Boomerang St (eastbound) bus stop will require pruning to allow pedestrian access. The tree is multi stemmed with crossing branches and although outwardly in good health and condition, has poor structural form. No objection would be raised to the tree’s removal subject to tree replenishment being undertaken consistent with the recent plantings undertaken in the road reserve when road resurfacing was undertaken.

 

Arborist approval for all proposed works to the road reserve is required to be submitted to Council under the Roads Act, prior to release of the of the construction certificate. To preserve the health and condition of all trees within Council’s Road Reserve, an arborist assessment of all proposed works within tree protection zones, is required to be included as part of this condition (Condition 36).

 

Conclusion

The application is supported, subject to conditions.

 

Engineering

 

Council's Development Engineer commented on the amended proposal as follows:

 

Stormwater disposal

The design shows the collection and discharge of all roof water to a below ground on-site detention tank (OSD) of 83.0cu.m located beneath the basement floor slab. The stormwater runoff from the detention facility is to be directed to the existing kerb inlet pit Wonga Wonga Street via a 375mm diameter pipe, which is acceptable.

 

A BASIX Certificate has been submitted, with the water commitments not requiring rainwater retention. Furthermore, the on-site detention volume has not been offset for on-site retention under Section 6.7.2 of Council’s Water Management DCP 47. Since a BASIX water score of 40 was achieved, no further retention requirements may be imposed.

 

Water quality measures have been implemented as required in Chapter 8 of Council’s Water Management DCP No.47. The pollutant load standards set out in Section 8.3.1 of the DCP has been satisfied using a proprietary pollution device ‘Hume Jellyfish Filter Model’ downstream from the detention system prior to connection into Council’s public drainage system.

 

The stormwater plans submitted detail a system which complies with Council’s Development Control Plan DCP No.47 in relation to on-site detention, water quality and discharge from the site.

 

Traffic generation

 

According to the traffic generation rates nominated by the RMS Guidelines, the development would generate approximately 1-2 peak hour vehicle trips which is considered to be very low traffic generation. The report suggests this being similar to that generated by the existing dwelling on the site. The projected increase in traffic activity is minimal and would not have any unacceptable traffic implications in terms of road network capacity.

 

Vehicular access and accommodation arrangements

 

According to the SEPP (Housing for Seniors or People with a Disability) 2004, Schedule 3, Clause 50 (h) and 38(b), the parking requirements for the proposal are as follows:

 

 

 

Parking for self-contained dwellings

Compliance (Y /N)

0.5 car spaces for each bedroom where the development application is made by a person other than a social housing provider, or

1 car space for each 5 dwellings where the development application is made by, or is made by a person jointly with, a social housing provider.

Yes

 

The development provides 22 off-street parking spaces, comprising 20 residents’ spaces and 2 visitor spaces. According to the SEPP requirements above, the proposal needs 15 resident spaces and 0 visitors.

9 x 3 bedrooms = 27 x 0.5 = 13.5 spaces for the 3br units (single storey)

1 x 3 bedrooms = 3 x 0.5 = 1.5 spaces for the 3br units (two storey configuration)

 

Private Car Accommodation

Compliance (Y /N)

Car parking spaces must comply with the requirements for parking for persons with a disability set out in AS 2890 , and

5% of the total number of car parking spaces (or at least one space if there are fewer than 20 spaces) must be designed to enable the width of the spaces to be increased to 3.8 metres.

Yes

 

The SEPP requires the parking spaces to be designed to AS 2890.1:1993 and Schedule 3, Clause 5(a) of the Housing for Seniors Policy. The parking spaces are compliant, with the minimum required width being 3.2m with one space at 3.8m. 

 

Vehicular access to the car parking facility is to be provided via a new 4.5m and 6.0m wide entry / exit driveway with the widened driveway acting as a passing area to allow cars entering and exiting simultaneously. The single width entry to the basement is acceptable given the short driveway distance of approximately 6m that allows oncoming vehicles from both directions to pass one another.  

 

The access ramp, driveway widths and driveway gradients comply with Australian Standard 2890.1 (2004) “Off-Street car parking”. 

 

Waste collection

 

The development allows a garbage truck to enter and depart the garbage/room recycle storage area located within the basement. The swept paths to access the waste collection area have been provided using Council’s Waste Collection Vehicle (6.3m Mitsubishi Canter) which is compliant. A longitudinal section has also been submitted demonstrating that a clear head height of 2.6m has been provided on the access ramp and also throughout the basement car park. The turning manoeuvrability and driveway grade of 20% for the small waste collection vehicle complies with Council’s DCP No.40.

 

 

 

 

Construction management

 

A Construction Management Plan (CMP) has been submitted which indicates a 12.5m long truck to be utilised for the 3-stage construction process. The CMP is acceptable in principle in clearly identifying the truck movements and tree protection fencing however, based on the scale of works and expected construction vehicle movements, a detailed construction traffic management plan (CTMP) including a traffic control plan (TCP) for the demolition, excavation and construction stages should also be submitted for review prior to the commencement of any works on site.

 

It will be conditioned that a works zone be provided along the site frontage in Wonga Wonga Street, considering that west of the site in Turramurra Avenue there is another residential flat building under construction. Parking along the street is also limited due to commuter parking. Employee parking is to be made available on site when possible. 

 

Impacts on Council infrastructure

 

The applicant has provided a detailed design for the accessible footpath to the bus stop to demonstrate compliance with Clause 26 of the Seniors Living SEPP. The Access Report indicates provision of kerb ramps and a mid-block roadway crossing on Boomerang Street which may require driveways to be reconstructed. The design is to be endorsed by the access consultant and accompanied with the arborist’s advice regarding any works within tree protection zones. This will be conditioned for works under the Roads Act.

 

A footpath is to be constructed on the opposite side of the road down to the intersection of Wonga Wonga Street and Ku-ring-gai Avenue where there is the existing bitumen footpath. A new footpath along the site frontage is not required, however a pathway / pram ramp is to be provided from the site boundary to the street.

 

Geotechnical investigation

 

A geotechnical report has been submitted which assesses the sub-surface conditions and provides preliminary recommendations for the excavation of the basement.

 

The proposed development comprises the construction of an integrated housing development over one (1) level of basement car parking which will require excavation approximately 5.0m in depth.  As part of the investigation procedure, six (6) hand augered boreholes were drilled to depths of 1.5m and Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP) testing undertaken to assess the expected depth to weathered shale bedrock.  The boreholes indicated that shale bedrock will be encountered in the basement floor levels at 1.0 to 2.5m in depth. No groundwater was encountered.  

 

The geotechnical recommendations regarding battering, building foundations, retaining walls and shoring are to be carried out during construction as specified within the report

 

Recommendation

 

From an engineering perspective there are no objections to approval of this application, subject to conditions.

 

Building

 

Council's Building Officer commented on the proposal as follows:

 

Class 2 Building

 

The proposed building design complies in general with the Building Code of Australia (BCA) requirements.  Detail BCA assessment is to be undertaken by the Principal Certifying Authority at the CC stage.  The following building conditions apply:

 

-     Compliance with the Building Code of Australia

-     Compliance with the Disability (access to Premises – Buildings) Standards 2010 at the CC stage

-     Final fire safety certificate to be submitted with the final occupation certificate.

 

Condition 41 and Condition 85 are recommended to ensure compliance in this regard.

 

Statutory Provisions

 

State Environmental Planning Policy (Housing for Seniors or People with a Disability) 2004 – SEPP Seniors Living 2004

 

Clause 16 of SEPP (Seniors Living) 2004 states that development consent may be carried out only with development consent unless another planning instrument allows the development without consent. The proposed development requires the consent of Council pursuant to the provisions of the KPSO.

 

Clause 26 of SEPP (Seniors Living) 2004 requires that Council must not consent to a development application made pursuant to this chapter unless satisfied by written evidence of certain site related requirements have been met. Compliance with the requirements of clause 25(1)(2) is indicated in the table below.

 

Clause

Requirement

Compliance

clause 26(1)

·    Access to shops, banks, other retail and commercial services, community services and the practice of a general medical practitioner.

YES

The site is located 650-900m from Turramurra Shopping Centre

 

A public bus stop is located approximately 300 – 330m from the site in Boomerang Street, serviced by Bus Route 577.  The 577 bus route travels from North Turramurra to Turramurra and the railway station which is wheelchair accessible.

 

The 577 bus route services the bus stop multiple times week days and weekends 

 

26(2)

·    Located at a distance of not more than 400m from the site of the proposed development or is within 400m of public transport which will take the residents to the above mentioned services and via a route with satisfactory gradients.

 

 

·    Is available both to and from the development at least once between the hours of 8am-12pm and 12pm – 6pm each day from Monday to Friday.

 

Clause 27 (bush fire prone land): The site is not bushfire affected/prone land.

 

Clause 28 (water and sewer), states that Council must not consent to a development application unless satisfied by written evidence that the housing will be connected to a reticulated water system and have adequate facilities for the removal or disposal of sewerage. The site is connected to the sewer system and reticulated water is provided.

 

Clause 29 (site compatibility criteria): The consent authority, must consider the proposed development against Clauses 25(5)(b)(i), (iii) & (v) of the SEPP.

 

These considerations relate to:

 

(i)         the natural environment (including known significant environmental values, resources or hazards) and the existing uses and approved uses of land in the vicinity of the proposed development,

 

(ii)        the services and infrastructure that are or will be available to meet the demands arising from the proposed development (particularly, retail, community, medical and transport services having regard to the location and access requirements set out in clause 26) and any proposed financial arrangements for infrastructure provision,

 

(v)        without limiting any other criteria, the impact that the bulk, scale, built form and character of the proposed development is likely to have on the existing uses, approved uses and future uses of land in the vicinity of the development,

 

For the reasons outlined throughout this report, the proposed development is considered to be consistent with these matters for consideration. The proposed development:

 

·    will not unduly impact on the natural environment

·    is compatible with the existing use of the site as a senior’s living development

·    is consistent with the predominantly residential use of land surrounding the subject site and the likely continuing use of this land for residential purposes in the future

·    has access to sufficient services and infrastructure, including water and utilities as well as access to transport services

·    is of an acceptable bulk, scale and built form character in the context of the surrounding development

 

Clause 30 (site analysis), requires a site analysis be carried out and submitted to the consent authority.   A site analysis was submitted to Council, prepared by WGV Architecture (DA01 Issue B, Sep 2012 and DA18 Issue A, Dec 2012).  This analysis, together with other documentation in the development application, provides the necessary information for assessment purposes under this clause.

 

Clause 31 (design of in-fill self-care housing): requires the consent authority to take into consideration the provisions of Seniors Living Policy: Urban Design Guidelines for Infill Development.  The design of the development is satisfactory in relation to the design guideline requirements and achieves the desired built form and landscaping outcomes encouraged by the guide. 

 

The design of the development does not result in unreasonable loss of amenity to surrounding residential properties and is environmentally responsive ensuring no unreasonable impacts. 

 

Clause 32 (design of residential development), provides that consent must not be granted unless Council is satisfied that adequate regard has been given to the following principles:

 

Neighbourhood amenity and streetscape

 

The development responds to the natural features of the site and does not unreasonably impact upon the amenity of the surrounding neighbourhood. 

 

Visual and acoustic privacy

 

The scale of the development is acceptable and satisfactory setbacks are incorporated to provide boundary landscaping to mitigate amenity impacts on neighbours.

 

Solar access and design for climate

 

The development provides more than 3 hours of solar access at midwinter to the living areas within each of the dwellings.

 

Stormwater

 

Council’s Development Engineer has assessed the proposed method of stormwater management.  The proposal is satisfactory in relation to DCP 47 requirements, subject to conditions.

 

Crime prevention

 

The development has been satisfactorily designed with regard to the Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design Guidelines. 

 

Accessibility

 

Council has been provided with an access report prepared by an accredited access consultant (Access Report prepared by Accessibility Solutions, 12 September 2012).  The report demonstrates that the proposal complies with relevant accessibility provisions under the Australian Standards.  Council’s Development Engineer has reviewed the amended plans and detailed design for the accessible footpath to the bus stop and the proposal is satisfactory in relation to Clause 26 of SEPP SL.

 

Waste management

 

A designated garbage storage area has been provided within the basement.  Council’s Development Engineer is satisfied that the development allows for a garbage truck to enter and exit the basement to service the bin storage area.

 

Clause 40 (development standards) provides that a consent authority must not consent to a development application made pursuant to this chapter unless the proposed development complies with the standards specified in this clause.

 

Development standard

Comment

Compliance

Site area: 1000m2 (min)

The development has a site area of 3320.98sqm

YES

Site frontage: 20m (min)

The development has a site frontage of 39.625m to Wonga Wonga Street.

YES

Height: 8m (max)

The development has a maximum height of 7.1m

YES

Height: 2 storey (max) adjacent to a boundary of the site

Block A and Block B adjacent to the Wonga Wonga Street have a height of 2 storeys.

YES

Height: A building located in the rear 25% area of the site must not exceed 1 storey in height

Development located in the rear 25% of the site has a maximum height of 1 storey (Block C).

YES

 

Clause 50 of SEPP (Seniors Living) 2004 stipulates standards which if complied with, cannot be used to refuse development for self-contained dwellings. These standards are as follows:

 

Development standard

Comment

Compliance

Clause 50(a) (building height)

Height to be less than 8.0 metres

7.1m

YES

Clause 50 (b) (density and scale)

0.50:1

0.498:1

YES

Clause 50(c) (landscaped area)

Minimum 30% of the site to be landscape area

Min: 996sqm

1264sqm or 38%

 

YES

Clause 50(d) (deep soil zones)

15% site area (498m2) with 2/3 (332m2) being located at the rear of the site with a minimum dimension of 3m.

 

1264.32sqm or 38%

550sqm or 16.5% at the rear

 

YES

 

 

Clause 50(e) (solar access)

Min 70% or 3.5 dwellings receive minimum 3 hours direct sunlight between 9am-3pm in mid-winter.

3+ hours sunlight

YES

Clause 50(f) (private open space)

• Single level or ground floor dwellings = 15m2 (incl. Area 3m x 3m accessible from living area)

 

All dwellings provided with an excess of 15sqm of private open space

YES

Clause 50(h)

0.5 car spaces for each bedroom where the development application is made by a person other than a social housing provider

10 x 3 bed units = 15 car spaces required

20 residential spaces

and

2 visitor spaces

(basement carpark)

YES

 

Schedule 3, Standards concerning accessibility and usability

 

Clause 41 states that Council must not consent to a development application for self care dwellings unless it complies with the standards listed in Schedule 3. The following assessment is provided against the standards in Schedule 3:

 

Development standard

Comment

Compliance

2. Siting standards:

100% of dwellings to have wheelchair access to public road or internal road if site gradient is less than 1:10.

The applicant’s accessibility report confirms access to and from the development complies with relevant Australian Standards.

YES

Wheelchair access to be available to all common areas and facilities.

 

YES

3. security:

Pathway lighting must be designed and located to avoid glare.

Yes, conditions of consent (Condition 88).

YES

4. letterboxes:

Must be lockable and situated on a hard standing area and be wheelchair accessible.

Yes, letterbox appropriately located and serviceable adjacent to the site entrance.

YES

5. private car accommodation:

Car parking spaces to comply with:

(a)  disability requirements of AS2890

(b)  5% of spaces capable of being widened to 3.8m

(c)  Garage to have power operated doors.

Basement carparking arrangements satisfactory and compliant.

YES

6. accessible entry:

Every entry must:

·    not have a slope that exceeds 1:40

·    comply with clauses 4.3.1 & 4.3.2 of AS 4299

·    have entry hardware which complies with AS 1428

The access report confirms that the entries to all units are to include complying accessible paths of travel with clear door openings at a single leaf of 850mm to comply with AS1428.1

YES

 

7. interior general:

·    internal doors must have a clearance of 800mm

·    internal corridors must have a width of at least 1000mm

·    the width at internal door approaches must be at least 1200mm

The access report confirms that the proposed dwellings will comply with the width requirements of the Australian Standard.

YES

 

8. bedroom:

At least one bedroom within the dwelling must have:

·    an area sufficient to accommodate a wardrobe and a queen sized bed, with an area at least 1200mm wide at the foot of the bed 2 double general power outlets adjacent to the head of the bed

·    1 general power outlet on the wall opposite the bed

·    a telephone outlet and power outlet next to the bed on the side closest to the door

·    a potential illumination of 300 lux

The access report confirms that each unit has a bedroom that complies with these requirements.

YES

 

9. bathroom:

A bathroom must have:

• an area that complies with AS 1428

• a slip resistant floor

• a that complies with AS 1428. the recess shall incorporate the following:

o the ability to provide a grab rail

o can accommodate a hand held shower on a slider rail

o can accommodate a folding seat

• a double power outlet beside the mirror

The access report confirms that each unit is to have a bathroom that complies with these requirements.

YES

 

10. toilet:

A dwelling must have a toilet:

• that is a visitable toilet in accordance with AS4299

 

The access report confirms that each unit has a toilet that is visitable in accordance with the area and special requirements of AS 4299

YES

 

11. surface finishes:

Balconies and external paved areas must have slip-resistant surfaces.

The proposed balconies are to incorporate a slip-resistant surface.

YES

 

12. doors:

Door hardware provided for opening doors must be provided in accordance with AS4299.

The proposed door handles are to be provided in accordance with AS 4299.

YES

 

13. ancillary items:

Switches and power points must be provided in accordance with AS4299.

The proposed switches and power points are to be provided in accordance with AS 4299.

YES

 

15. living/dining room:

A living room in a self contained dwelling must have:

·    a circulation space of at least 2250mm in diameter and as set out in clause 4.7 of AS 4299

·    a telephone adjacent to a general power outlet

·    a potential illumination level of 300 lux

The access report confirms that the proposed development complies with these requirements.

YES

 

16. kitchen:

A kitchen in a self contained dwelling must have:

·    a circulation space in accordance with AS4299

·    a width at door approaches of 1200mm 

·    a tap set that is located within 300mm of the front of the sink and comprises of a lever type mixing tap

·    a thermostatic mixing valve for the hot water outlet

·    a cook top with either front or side controls which have a raised cross bar. The stove is also to be provided with an isolating switch

·    a work surface adjacent to the cook top which is at the same height and at least 800mm in length

·    an oven that is located adjacent to a work surface the height of which can be adjusted

·    “D” pull cupboard handles

·    General power outlets at least one is a double outlet within 300mm of the front of a work surface and one which is for a refrigerator which can be readily accessed once installed

The access report confirms that the proposed development complies with these requirements.

YES

 

19. laundry:

A self contained dwelling must have a laundry which:

• a door width of 1300mm

• has provision for a washing machine

• has the provision for the installation of a clothes dryer

• has a clear space in front of appliances of 1300mm

• has a slip resistant floor surface

• has an accessible path of travel to any external clothes line

The access report confirms that the proposed development complies with these requirements.

YES

 

20. storage:

A self-contained dwelling must be provided with a linen cupboard:

• that is at least 600mm wide

• has adjustable shelving

The access report confirms that the proposed development complies with this requirement.

YES

 

21. garbage:

A garbage storage area must be provided in an accessible location.

 

Garbage bins have been within the basement of the development and are capable of being satisfactorily serviced.

YES

 

State Environmental Planning Policy No. 55 – Remediation of Land

 

The provisions of SEPP 55 require Council to consider the potential for a site to be contaminated. The subject site has a history of residential use and as such, it is unlikely to contain any contamination and further investigation is not warranted in this case.

 

State Environmental Planning Policy (Building Sustainability Index: BASIX) 2004

 

A valid BASIX certificate has been submitted (BASIX Certificate No.440332M_04).  The certificate demonstrates compliance with the provisions of the SEPP and adequately reflects all amendments to the application.

 

Sydney Regional Environmental Planning Policy (Sydney Harbour Catchment) 2005

 

Matters for consideration under SREP 2005 include biodiversity, ecology and environmental protection, public access to and scenic qualities of foreshores and waterways, maintenance of views, control of boat facilities and maintenance of a working harbour. The proposal is not in close proximity to, or within view, of a waterway or wetland and is considered satisfactory. Water re-use measures will minimise the impact on downstream waterways.

 

POLICY PROVISIONS

Ku-ring-gai Planning Scheme Ordinance (KPSO)

 

Clause 38B – Services

 

Clause 38B states that consent must not be issued to the carrying out of development on land unless access to a water supply, drainage and a sewerage system will be available. The site is connected to the sewer system and reticulated water is provided. 

 

Clause 61D and 61E – Development of and within the vicinity of heritage items

 

The subject site is not heritage listed, however is located adjacent to a heritage item under the KPSO, being 44 Ku-ring-gai Avenue and there are a large number of heritage items within the vicinity of the site including the following:

 

·    Nos. 1, 8, 12, 17, 26, 28, 24, 31, 37, 43, 51, 54, 55, 60, 61, 70, 73 & 77 Ku-ring-gai Avenue.

·    No 2 Nulla Nulla Avenue.

·    Nos 7, 35, 39, 41 & 47 Warrangi Street.

 

Council’s Heritage Advisor has reviewed the proposal and does not consider that the proposed development would result in an unreasonable impact on the heritage items.

 

Schedule 9 – Aims and objectives for residential zones

 

The ‘Aims and Objectives for residential zones’ outlined in Schedule 9 of the KPSO essentially seek ensure a proposed development will retain the streetscape character and amenity to neighbouring residential properties. The matters for consideration outlined within these aims and objectives are covered under the provisions SEPP (Housing for Seniors or People with a Disability) 2004. The proposed development satisfies the SEPPSL provisions.  In this regard, the proposal on merit is satisfactory in relation to Schedule 9 provisions of the KPSO. 

 

Development Control Plan No. 31 Access

 

The aim of DCP 31 is to ensure access for all to public buildings, community facilities and new developments, excluding dwelling houses and dual occupancies but including all buildings and facilities owned or leased by Council and to ensure that people with a disability have equal access to employment opportunities by way of affording access to facilities, services and opportunities to meet their specific needs.

 

The provisions of SEPP (Housing for Seniors or People with a Disability) 2004 override Council’s controls with regard to accessibility. The proposed development complies with the requirements of the SEPP and is acceptable in this regard.

 

Development Control Plan No. 40 - Construction and Demolition Waste Management

 

The key objectives of this DCP are to encourage building design and construction techniques which will minimise waste generation, implement the principles of the waste hierarchy of avoiding, reusing and recycling building and construction materials, and commercial waste, minimise the environmental impacts of waste, promote the principles of ecologically sustainable development, meet Council's responsibilities in relation to the Northern Sydney Regional Waste Plan and assist in achieving the Federal and State Government's waste minimisation targets.

 

A waste management plan, demonstrating compliance with the requirements of the DCP, has been submitted and is deemed to be acceptable.

 

Development Control Plan No. 43 - Car Parking

 

In relation to the number of car parking spaces, the provisions of SEPP (Housing for Seniors or People with a Disability) 2004 override any other parking requirements where in conflict. As detailed earlier in this report, the proposed development complies with the relevant provisions of the SEPP with regard to the number of car parking spaces required.

 

Council’s Development Engineer has noted that the proposed development provides adequate area for vehicular manoeuvring.

 

Development Control Plan No.47 - Water Management

 

The proposed development has been assessed against DCP47 and complies with all relevant provisions.

 

Section 94 Plan

 

The development attracts a section 94 contribution of $164,372.20 pursuant to Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010, which is required to be paid prior to the issue of a construction certificate. (Condition 40).

 

Local Environmental Plan (Local Centres) 2012

 

On 7 May 2012, the NSW Department of Planning & Infrastructure issued a Gateway Determination to allow the draft Ku-ring-gai Local Centres (Local Environmental Plan) 2012 - Planning Proposal to be exhibited. The draft Plan was exhibited from 21 May 2012 to 18 June 2012.

 

At the Extraordinary Meeting of Council on 31 July 2012, Council considered submissions from the exhibition period and a revised Draft LEP (Local Centres) 2012 was adopted and forwarded to the Minister for Planning and Infrastructure with a request that the Plan be made. 

 

DA0385/12 was lodged on 13 September 2012.  The zoning of the site was exhibited and adopted by Council as R2 Low Density Residential.  The site interfaces with a R3 Medium Density Residential zoning to the west of the site.

 

On 25 January 2012, the Ku-ring-gai Local Centres Plan was published in the NSW government Gazette.  The plan takes effect on 8 February 2013 (14 days after it is published on the NSW legislation website).  The gazetted plan includes a savings provision which reads as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

1.8A   Savings provision relating to development applications

If a development application has been made before the commencement of this Plan in relation to land to which this Plan applies and the application has not been finally determined before that commencement, the application must be determined as if this Plan had not commenced.

 

As the gazetted plan does not take effect until 8 February 2013 (post Ordinary Meeting of Council – 5 February 213), the draft plan as adopted by Council on 31 July 2012 remains the applicable draft plan to be considered under Section 79C(1)(a)(ii) of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979.

 

Under the provisions of s.79C(1)(a)(ii) of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979, any draft environmental planning instrument (ie LEP) that is or has been placed on public exhibition is a relevant matter for consideration, which applies in this circumstance.  Section 79C(e) of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979 also allows for matters in the public interest to be relevant matters for consideration in a development assessment.

 

The site is included under Draft Ku-Ring-gai Local Environmental Plan (Local Centres) (DLEP) 2012 for the locality of Turramurra.  Having regard that the Draft LEP (Local Centres) 2012 was gazetted on 25 January 2013, the draft plan is considered certain and imminent. 

 

The objectives of the R2 Low Density Residential Zone read as follows:

 

Zone R2 Low Density Residential

 

1 Objectives of zone

 

-     To provide for the housing needs of the community within a low density residential environment.

-     To enable other land uses that provide facilities or services to meet the day to day needs of residents.

-     To provide housing that is compatible with the existing environmental and built character of Ku-ring-gai

 

The development is satisfactory in relation to the zone objective requirements. 

 

The maximum height for the R2 zone is 9.5 metres.  The proposal complies with this requirement.  The maximum floor space ratio for the R2 zone is 0.3: 1.  The proposal includes a maximum FSR of 0.498:1, permissible under SEPP Seniors Living. 

 

Likely Impacts

 

The proposed development is assessed as having an acceptable impact upon the surrounding social, economic, natural and built environments.

 

 

 

 

 

Suitability of the Site

 

The site is zoned for residential use and is suitable for the proposed development, being a residential development for seniors or people with a disability.

 

The site is appropriately located with regard to local facilities and public transport and is suitable for housing for seniors or people with a disability.

 

Public Interest

 

The approval of the application is considered to be in the in the public interest.

 

Conclusion

 

Having regard to the provisions of section 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, the proposed development is considered to be satisfactory. Therefore, it is recommended that the application be approved.

 

Recommendation:

 

PURSUANT TO SECTION 80(1) OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT ACT, 1979

 

THAT the Council, as the consent authority, grant development consent to DA0385/12 for demolition of an existing dwelling and associated structures and construction of a development comprising 10 self care apartments over basement parking pursuant to SEPP (Housing for Seniors or People with a Disability) 2004 on land at 9 Wonga Wonga Street, Turramurra, for a period of two (2) years from the date of the Notice of Determination, subject to the following conditions:

 

Conditions that identify approved plans:

 

1.    Approved architectural plans and documentation (new development)

 

The development must be carried out in accordance with the following plans and documentation listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, except where amended by other conditions of this consent:

 

Plan no.

Drawn by

Dated

DA00, DA01 Issue B

Winter Group Vietnam Architecture

September 2012

DA02, DA03, DA04, DA05, DA06, DA07, DA08, DA09, DA10, DA11 Issue C

Winter Group Vietnam Architecture

December 2012

Sheets 1 – 6, Revision 4

Bill Muir

01/12/12

2012-07/DA13 Revision A

Winter Group Vietnam Architecture

07/09/12

2012-07/DA14 Revision A,

Winter Group Vietnam Architecture

06/09/12

2012-07/DA15, 16, 17, 18 Revision A

Winter Group Vietnam Architecture

September 2012

2012-07/DA12 Revision C

Winter Group Vietnam Architecture

January 2013

1328 – S1/4, S2/4, S3/4 & S4/4 Revision E

John Romanous & Associates

12.09.2012

FSR Diagram – A, B & C Issue B

Winter Group Vietnam Architecture

September 2012

 

Document(s)

Dated

Colours and finishes board by Beverley Kahn Interior Design Consultant

Received by Council
13 September 2012

Basix certificate No.440332M_04

6 December 2012

Arboricultural Impact Report

12 September 2012

Access Report by Mark Relf

12 September 2012

Geotechnical Assessment by GDK Keighran Geotechnics

September 2012

Renbar Constructions – Construction Traffic Management Plan

Undated, received by Council 13 September 2012

Terraffic Pty Ltd – Car park & access compliance report

12 September 2012

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

2.    Inconsistency between documents

 

In the event of any inconsistency between conditions of this consent and the drawings/documents referred to above, the conditions of this consent prevail.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to demolition, excavation or construction:

 

3.    Road opening permit

 

The opening of any footway, roadway, road shoulder or any part of the road reserve shall not be carried out without a road opening permit being obtained from Council (upon payment of the required fee) beforehand.

 

Reason:       Statutory requirement (Roads Act 1993 Section 138) and to maintain the integrity of Council’s infrastructure.

 

4.    Notice of commencement

 

At least 48 hours prior to the commencement of any development (including demolition, excavation, shoring or underpinning works), a notice of commencement of building or subdivision work form and appointment of the principal certifying authority form shall be submitted to Council.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

5.    Notification of builder’s details

 

Prior to the commencement of any development or excavation works, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be notified in writing of the name and contractor licence number of the owner/builder intending to carry out the approved works.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

6.    Dilapidation survey and report (public infrastructure)

 

Prior to the commencement of any development or excavation works on site, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a dilapidation report on the visible and structural condition of all structures of the following public infrastructure, has been completed and submitted to Council:

 

Public infrastructure

 

·       Full road pavement width, including kerb and gutter, of Wonga Wonga Street over the site frontage, including the full intersection.

·       All driveway crossings and laybacks opposite the subject site.

 

The report must be completed by a consulting structural/civil engineer. Particular attention must be paid to accurately recording (both written and photographic) existing damaged areas on the aforementioned infrastructure so that Council is fully informed when assessing any damage to public infrastructure caused as a result of the development.

 

The developer may be held liable to any recent damage to public infrastructure in the vicinity of the site, where such damage is not accurately recorded by the requirements of this condition prior to the commencement of works.

 

Note:     A written acknowledgment from Council must be obtained (attesting to this condition being appropriately satisfied) and submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the commencement of any excavation works.

 

Reason:         To record the structural condition of public infrastructure before works commence.

 

7.     Photographic archival recording

 

The existing house, the site and its streetscape context and relationship to adjoining properties shall be photographically recorded.

 

Reason:  To ensure the proper management of historical artefacts to ensure their preservation.

 

8.     Dilapidation survey and report (private property)

 

Prior to the commencement of any demolition or excavation works on site, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a dilapidation report on the visible and structural condition of all structures upon the following lands, has been completed and submitted to Council:

 

Address

·       15 Wonga Wonga Street

 

The dilapidation report must include a photographic survey of adjoining properties detailing their physical condition, both internally and externally, including such items as walls ceilings, roof and structural members. The report must be completed by a consulting structural/geotechnical engineer as determined necessary by that professional based on the excavations for the proposal and the recommendations of the submitted geotechnical report.

 

In the event that access for undertaking the dilapidation survey is denied by a property owner, the applicant must demonstrate in writing to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority that all reasonable steps have been taken to obtain access and advise the affected property owner of the reason for the survey and that these steps have failed.

 

Note:     A copy of the dilapidation report is to be provided to Council prior to any excavation works been undertaken. The dilapidation report is for record keeping purposes only and may be used by an applicant or affected property owner to assist in any civil action required to resolve any dispute over damage to adjoining properties arising from works.

 

Reason:         To record the structural condition of likely affected properties before works commence.

 

9.     Construction and traffic management plan

 

The applicant must submit to Council a Construction Traffic Management Plan (TMP), which is to be approved prior to the commencement of any works on site.

 

The plan is to consist of a report with Traffic Control Plans attached.

 

The report is to contain commitments which must be followed by the demolition and excavation contractor, builder, owner and subcontractors.  The TMP applies to all persons associated with demolition, excavation and construction of the development.

 

The report is to contain construction vehicle routes for approach and departure to and from all directions.

 

The report is to contain a site plan showing entry and exit points.  Swept paths are to be shown on the site plan showing access and egress for an 11 metre long heavy rigid vehicle.

 

The Traffic Control Plans are to be prepared by a qualified person (red card holder).  One must be provided for each of the following stages of the works:

 

·       Demolition

·       Excavation

·       Concrete pour

·       Construction of vehicular crossing and reinstatement of footpath

·       Traffic control for vehicles reversing into or out of the site.

 

Traffic controllers must be in place at the site entry and exit points to control heavy vehicle movements in order to maintain the safety of pedestrians and other road users. 

 

When a satisfactory TMP is received, a letter of approval will be issued with conditions attached.  Traffic management at the site must comply with the approved TMP as well as any conditions in the letter issued by Council.  Council’s Rangers will be patrolling the site regularly and fines will be issued for any non-compliance with this condition.

 

Reason:       To ensure that appropriate measures have been considered during all phases of the construction process in a manner that maintains the environmental amenity and ensures the ongoing safety and protection of people.

 

10.   Work zone

 

A works zone shall be provided along the site frontage. The applicant must make a written application to the Ku-ring-gai Local Traffic Committee to install the work zone. Work zones are provided specifically for the set down and pick up of materials and not for the parking of private vehicles associated with the site. Work zones will generally not be approved where there is sufficient space on-site for the setting down and picking up of goods being taken to or from a construction site.

 

If the work zone is approved by the Local Traffic Committee, the applicant must obtain a written copy of the related resolution from the Ku-ring-gai Local Traffic Committee and submit this to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to commencement of any works on site.

 

Where approval of the work zone is resolved by the Committee, the necessary work zone signage shall be installed (at the cost of the applicant) and the adopted fee paid prior to commencement of any works on site. At the expiration of the work zone approval, the applicant is required to remove the work zone signs and reinstate any previous signs at their expense.

 

In the event the work zone is required for a period beyond that initially approved by the Traffic Committee, the applicant shall make a payment to Council for the extended period in accordance with Council’s schedule of fees and charges for work zones prior to the extended period commencing.

 

Reason:         To ensure that appropriate measures have been made for the operation of the site during the construction phase.

 

11.   Sediment controls

 

Prior to any work commencing on site, sediment and erosion control measures shall be installed along the contour immediately downslope of any future disturbed areas.

 

The form of the sediment controls to be installed on the site shall be determined by reference to the ‘NSW Department of Housing manual ‘Managing Urban Stormwater: Soils and Construction’. The erosion controls shall be maintained in an operational condition until the development activities have been completed and the site fully stabilised. Sediment shall be removed from the sediment controls following each heavy or prolonged rainfall period.

 

Reason:    To preserve and enhance the natural environment.

 

12.   Erosion and drainage management

 

Earthworks and/or demolition of any existing buildings shall not commence until an erosion and sediment control plan is submitted to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority.  The plan shall comply with the guidelines set out in the NSW Department of Housing manual "Managing Urban Stormwater: Soils and Construction" certificate. Erosion and sediment control works shall be implemented in accordance with the erosion and sediment control plan.

 

Reason:         To preserve and enhance the natural environment.

 

13.   Tree protection fencing

 

To preserve the following tree/s, no work shall commence until the area beneath their canopy is fenced off at the specified radius from the trunk/s to prevent any activities, storage or the disposal of materials within the fenced area.  The fence/s shall be maintained intact until the completion of all demolition/building work on site.

 

Schedule

Tree/Location

Radius in metres

Tree 5/ Lophostemon confertus (Brushbox) located at the north-east corner of the site, within the front setback

5m

Tree 9/ Phoenix canariensis (Canary Island Palm) located in the rear yard, west of Block C

2m

Tree 10/ Lophostemon confertus (Brushbox) located on southern boundary

8m

Tree 11/ Lophostemon confertus (Brushbox) located on southern boundary

8m

Tree 12/ Lophostemon confertus (Brushbox) located on southern boundary

8m

Tree 13/ Harpephyllum caffrum (Kaffir Plum) located on southern boundary

8m

Tree 14/ Lophostemon confertus (Brushbox) located on southern boundary

8m

Tree 25/ Jacaranda mimosifolia (Jacaranda) located at north-west corner of site

1.5m

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees during the construction phase.

 

 

14.   Tree protection fencing excluding structure

 

To preserve the following tree/s, no work shall commence until the area beneath their canopy excluding that area of the approved (existing driveway or basement to Block B) shall be fenced off for the specified radius from the trunk to prevent any activities, storage or the disposal of materials within the fenced area.  The fence/s shall be maintained intact until the completion of all demolition/building work on site:

 

 

 

Schedule

Tree/Location

Radius in metres

Tree 4/ Lophostemon confertus (Brushbox) located within the front setback

4m

Tree 17/ Cupressus macrocarpa ‘Aurea’ (Monterey Cypress – Gold Form) located on the western boundary of rear yard, within the adjoining property

10m

Tree 19/ Cedrus deodara (Himalayan Cedar)located on the western boundary of rear yard, within the adjoining property

8m

Tree 20/ Melia azedarach 'Australasica' (White Cedar) located on western boundary

5m

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees during the construction phase.

 

15.   Tree protective fencing type galvanised mesh

 

The tree protection fencing shall be constructed of galvanised pipe at 2.4 metre spacing and connected by securely attached chain mesh fencing to a minimum height of 1.8 metres in height prior to work commencing.

 

Reason:       To protect existing trees during construction phase.

 

16.   Tree protection signage

 

Prior to works commencing, tree protection signage is to be attached to each tree protection zone, displayed in a prominent position and the sign repeated at 10 metres intervals or closer where the fence changes direction.  Each sign shall contain in a clearly legible form, the following information:

 

Tree protection zone.

 

·       This fence has been installed to prevent damage to the trees and their growing environment both above and below ground and access is restricted.

·       Any encroachment not previously approved within the tree protection zone shall be the subject of an arborist's report.

·       The arborist's report shall provide proof that no other alternative is available.

·       The Arborist's report shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority for further consultation with Council.

·       The name, address, and telephone number of the developer.

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees during the construction phase.

 

17.   Ground protection – avoiding soil compaction

 

To preserve the following tree/s and avoid soil compaction, no work shall commence until temporary measures to avoid soil compaction (eg rumble boards) beneath the canopy of the following tree/s is/are installed:

 

Schedule

Tree/Location

Tree 4/ Lophostemon confertus (Brushbox) located within the front setback

Tree 17/ Cupressus macrocarpa ‘Aurea’ (Monterey Cypress – Gold Form) located on the western boundary of rear yard, within the adjoining property

Tree 19/ Cedrus deodara (Himalayan Cedar)located on the western boundary of rear yard, within the adjoining property

Tree 20/ Melia azedarach 'Australasica' (White Cedar) located on western boundary

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees during the construction phase.

 

18.   Tree fencing inspection

 

Upon installation of the required tree protection measures, an inspection of the site by the Principal Certifying Authority is required to verify that tree protection measures comply with all relevant conditions.

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees during the construction phase.

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of the construction certificate:

 

19.   Amendments to approved landscape plans

 

Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the approved landscape plans, listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, have been amended in accordance with the requirements of this condition as well as other conditions of this consent:

 

Plan no.

Drawn by

Date

Landscape Cover Sheet - LA00.00 ‘4’

Landscape Planting Plan 1 - LA01.01 ‘4’

Landscape Planting Plan 2 - LA01.02 ‘4’

Landscape Planting Plan 3 - LA01.03 ‘4’

Landscape Planting Plan 4 - LA01.04 ‘4’

Landscape Planting Plan 5 - LA01.05 ‘4’

Bill Muir

1/12/2012

 

The following changes are required to the Landscape Plan:

 

1.      To reduce the bulk of the new building, three (3) additional small ornamental trees, such as Lagerstroemia indica (Crepe Myrtle) or similar, shall be shown planted in the eastern boundary planting bed, evenly spaced along the eastern elevation of Building A.

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the landscape plan has been amended are required by this condition.

 

Note:     An amended plan, prepared by a landscape architect or qualified landscape designer shall be submitted to the Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:       To ensure adequate landscaping of the site.

 

20.   Removal of existing tennis court fencing

 

All fencing associated with the existing tennis court is to be removed. 

 

Reason:    The proposal involves the removal of the tennis court, accordingly no further purpose is served in retaining the tennis court fencing.

 

21.   Amendments to approved environmental site management plan

 

Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the approved environmental site management plan, listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, have been amended in accordance with the requirements of this condition as well as other conditions of this consent:

 

Plan no.

Drawn by

Date

DA15 Issue A

Winter Group Vietnam

September 2012

 

The following changes are required to the environmental site management plan:

 

1)      Tree protection fencing location to be amended in accordance with conditions of consent

 

2)      All notes regarding tree protection measures, including location and type of fencing or ground protection, shall be amended or deleted in accordance with the conditions of consent. 

 

3)      All proposed stockpiles and site sheds are to be shown located outside the tree protection zone of trees to be retained.

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the environmental site management plan has been amended as required by this condition.

 

Reason:       To ensure the protection of trees.

 

22.   Long service levy

 

In accordance with Section 109F(i) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act a Construction Certificate shall not be issued until any long service levy payable under Section 34 of the Building and Construction Industry Long Service Payments Act 1986 (or where such levy is payable by instalments, the first instalment of the levy) has been paid. Council is authorised to accept payment. Where payment has been made elsewhere, proof of payment is to be provided to Council.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

23.   Builder’s indemnity insurance

 

The applicant, builder, developer or person who does the work on this development, must arrange builder’s indemnity insurance and submit the certificate of insurance in accordance with the requirements of Part 6 of the Home Building Act 1989 to the Certifying Authority for endorsement of the plans accompanying the Construction Certificate.

 

It is the responsibility of the applicant, builder or developer to arrange the builder's indemnity insurance for residential building work over the value of $20,000. The builder's indemnity insurance does not apply to commercial or industrial building work or to residential work valued at less than $20,000, nor to work undertaken by persons holding an owner/builder's permit issued by the Department of Fair Trading (unless the owner/builder's property is sold within 7 years of the commencement of the work).

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

24.   Access for people with disabilities (residential)

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that access for people with disabilities to and from and between the public domain, residential units and all common open space areas is provided. Consideration must be given to the means of dignified and equitable access.

 

Compliant access provisions for people with disabilities shall be clearly shown on the  plans submitted with the Construction Certificate.  All details shall be provided to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate. All details shall be prepared in consideration of the Disability Discrimination Act, and the relevant provisions of AS1428.1, AS1428.2, AS1428.4 and AS 1735.12.

 

Reason:         To ensure the provision of equitable and dignified access for all people in accordance with disability discrimination legislation and relevant Australian Standards.

 

25.   Stormwater management plan

 

Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, the applicant must submit, for approval by the Principal Certifying Authority, scale construction plans and specifications in relation to the stormwater management and disposal system for the development. The plan(s) must be based on Stormwater Management Plans Drawing No. 1328 S1 – S4 Rev. 'E', dated 12 September 2012, prepared by John Romanous & Associates Pty Ltd and must include the following detail:

 

·       exact location and reduced level of discharge point to the public drainage system

·       Layout of the property drainage system components, including but not limited to (as required) gutters, downpipes, spreaders,  pits, swales, kerbs, cut-off and intercepting drainage structures, subsoil drainage, flushing facilities and all ancillary stormwater plumbing - all designed for a 235mm/hour rainfall intensity for a duration of five (5) minutes (1:50 year storm recurrence)

·       location(s), dimensions and specifications for the required rainwater storage and reuse tanks and systems and where proprietary products are to be used, manufacturer specifications or equivalent shall be provided

·       specifications for reticulated pumping facilities (including pump type and manufacturer specifications) and ancillary plumbing to fully utilise rainwater in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Council Development Control Plan 47 and/or BASIX commitments

·       details of the required on-site detention tanks required by Ku-ring-gai Water Management DCP 47, including dimensions, materials, locations, orifice and discharge control pit details as required (refer Chapter 6 and Appendices 2, 3 and 5 of DCP 47 for volume, PSD and design requirements)

·       the required basement stormwater pump-out system is to cater for driveway runoff and subsoil drainage (refer appendix 7.1.1 of Development Control Plan 47 for design)

 

The above construction drawings and specifications are to be prepared by a qualified and experienced civil/hydraulic engineer in accordance with Council’s Water Management Development Control Plan 47, Australian Standards 3500.2 and 3500.3 - Plumbing and Drainage Code and the Building Code of Australia.

 

Reason:         To protect the environment.

 

26.   Stormwater detention

 

Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that an on-site stormwater detention system must be provided to control the rate of runoff leaving the site. The minimum volume of the required on-site detention system must be determined in accordance with Chapter 6 of the Ku-ring-gai Council Water Management Development Control Plan 47 - having regard to the specified volume concession offered in lieu of installing rainwater retention tanks. The on-site detention system must be designed by a qualified civil/hydraulic engineer and must satisfy the design controls set out in Appendix 5 of DCP 47.

 

Reason:         To protect the environment.

 

27.   Excavation for services

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that no proposed underground services (ie: water, sewerage, drainage, gas or other service) unless previously approved by conditions of consent, are located beneath the canopy of any tree protected under Council’s Tree Preservation Order, located on the subject allotment and adjoining allotments.

 

Note:     A plan detailing the routes of these services and trees protected under the Tree Preservation Order shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:         To ensure the protection of trees.

 

28.   Recycling and waste management

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the development provides a common garbage collection/separation area sufficient in size to store all wheelie garbage bins and recycling bins provided by Council for the number of units in the development in accordance with DCP 40. The garbage collection point is to be accessible by Council’s Waste Collection Services.

 

The responsibility for:

 

·       the cleaning of waste rooms and waste service compartments; and

·       the transfer of bins within the property, and to the collection point once the development is in use;

 

shall be determined when designing the system and clearly stated in the Waste Management Plan.

 

Note:     The architectural plans are to be amended and provided to the Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:         Environmental protection.

 

29.   Noise from plant in residential zone

 

Where any form of mechanical ventilation equipment or other noise generating plant is proposed as part of the development, prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate the Certifying Authority, shall be satisfied that the operation of an individual piece of equipment or operation of equipment in combination will not exceed more than 5dB(A) above the background level during the day when measured at the site’s boundaries and shall not exceed the background level at night (10.00pm –6.00 am) when measured at the boundary of the site.

 

C1.  Note:  A certificate from an appropriately qualified acoustic engineer is to be submitted with the Construction Certificate, certifying that all mechanical ventilation equipment or other noise generating plant in isolation or in combination with other plant will comply with the above requirements.

 

Reason:         To comply with best practice standards for residential acoustic amenity.

 

30.   Location of plant

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that all plant and equipment (including but not limited to air conditioning equipment) is located within the basement.

 

C1.  Note:  Architectural plans identifying the location of all plant and equipment shall be provided to the Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:         To minimise impact on surrounding properties, improved visual appearance and amenity for locality.

 

31.   Driveway crossing levels

 

Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, driveway and associated footpath levels for any new, reconstructed or extended sections of driveway crossings between the property boundary and road alignment must be obtained from Ku-ring-gai Council. Such levels are only able to be issued by Council under the Roads Act 1993.  All footpath crossings, laybacks and driveways are to be constructed according to Council's specifications "Construction of Gutter Crossings and Footpath Crossings".

 

Specifications are issued with alignment levels after completing the necessary application form at Customer Services and payment of the assessment fee. When completing the request for driveway levels application from Council, the applicant must attach a copy of the relevant development application drawing which indicates the position and proposed level of the proposed driveway at the boundary alignment.

 

This development consent is for works wholly within the property. Development consent does not imply approval of footpath or driveway levels, materials or location within the road reserve, regardless of whether this information is shown on the development application plans. The grading of such footpaths or driveways outside the property shall comply with Council's standard requirements.  The suitability of the grade of such paths or driveways inside the property is the sole responsibility of the applicant and the required alignment levels fixed by Council may impact upon these levels.

 

The construction of footpaths and driveways outside the property in materials other than those approved by Council is not permitted.

 

Reason:         To provide suitable vehicular access without disruption to pedestrian and vehicular traffic.

 

32.   Driveway grades – basement carparks

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, longitudinal driveway sections are to be prepared by a qualified civil/traffic engineer and be submitted for to and approved by the Certifying Authority. These profiles are to be at 1:100 scale along both edges of the proposed driveway, starting from the centreline of the frontage street carriageway to the proposed basement floor level. The traffic engineer shall provide specific written certification on the plans that:

 

·       vehicular access can be obtained using grades of 20% (1 in 5) maximum and

·       all changes in grade (transitions) comply with Australian Standard 2890.1 –“Off-street car parking” (refer clause 2.5.3) to prevent the scraping of the underside of vehicles. 

 

If a new driveway crossing is proposed, the longitudinal sections must incorporate the driveway crossing levels as issued by Council upon prior application.

 

Reason:         To provide suitable vehicular access without disruption to pedestrian and vehicular traffic.

 

33.   Basement car parking details

 

Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, certified parking layout plan(s) to scale showing all aspects of the vehicle access and accommodation arrangements must be submitted to and approved by the Certifying Authority. A qualified civil/traffic engineer must review the proposed vehicle access and accommodation layout and provide written certification on the plans that:

 

·       all parking space dimensions, driveway and aisle widths, driveway grades, transitions, circulation ramps, blind aisle situations and other trafficked areas comply with Australian Standard 2890.1 – 2004 “Off-street car parking”

·       a clear height clearance of 2.6 metres (required under DCP40 for waste collection trucks) is provided over the designated garbage collection truck manoeuvring areas within the basement

·       no doors or gates are provided in the access driveways to the basement carpark which would prevent unrestricted access for internal garbage collection at any time from the basement garbage storage and collection area

·       the dimensions of all parking spaces, including lengths and widths, comply with the State Environmental Planning Policy for Senior Living relating to height clearances and space dimensions

·       the vehicle access and accommodation arrangements are to be constructed and marked in accordance with the certified plans

 

Reason:         To ensure that parking spaces are in accordance with the approved development.

 

34.   Drainage of paved areas

 

All new exposed impervious areas graded towards adjacent property and/or habitable areas are to be drained via the main drainage system. This may require the installation of suitable inlets pits, cut-off structures (e.g. kerb), and/or barriers that direct such runoff to the formal drainage system. Details of such measures shall be shown on the Construction Certificate drawings, to the satisfaction of the Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:       To control surface run off and protect the environment.

 

35.   Vehicular access and garaging

 

Driveways and vehicular access ramps must be designed not to scrape the underside of cars. In all respects, the proposed vehicle access and accommodation arrangements must be designed and constructed to comply with Australian Standard 2890.1 – 2004 “Off-Street car parking”. Details are to be provided to and approved by the Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate.

 

Reason:         To ensure that parking spaces are in accordance with the approved development.

 

36.   Design of works in public road (Roads Act approval)

 

Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that engineering plans and specifications prepared by a qualified consulting engineer have been approved by Council’s Development Engineer. The plans to be assessed must be to a detail suitable for construction issue purposes and must detail the following infrastructure works required in Wonga Wonga Street and Boomerang Street:

 

·       Design details of the footpath on the opposite side of the road down to the intersection of Wonga Wonga Street and Ku-ring-gai Avenue

·       Pathway / pram ramp from the site frontage to the road

·       Detail design for the accessible footpath to the bus stop to demonstrate compliance with Clause 26 of the Seniors Living SEPP. Design to include provision of kerb ramps and mid-block roadway crossing on Boomerang Street.

·       The design is to be approved by the access consultant.  Any works within tree protection zones shall be endorsed by a qualified arborist.

 

Development consent does not give approval to these works in the road reserve.  The applicant must obtain a separate approval under sections 138 and 139 of The Roads Act 1993 for the works in the road reserve required as part of the development. The Construction Certificate must not be issued, and these works must not proceed until Council has issued a formal written approval under the Roads Act 1993.

 

The required plans and specifications are to be designed in accordance with the General Specification for the Construction of Road and Drainage Works in Ku-ring-gai Council, dated November 2004. The drawings must detail existing utility services and trees affected by the works, erosion control requirements and traffic management requirements during the course of works.  Survey must be undertaken as required. Traffic management is to be certified on the drawings as being in accordance with the documents SAA HB81.1 – 1996 – Field Guide for Traffic Control at Works on Roads – Part 1 and RTA Traffic Control at Work Sites (1998). Construction of the works must proceed only in accordance with any conditions attached to the Roads Act approval issued by Council.

 

A minimum of three (3) weeks will be required for Council to assess the Roads Act application. Early submission of the Roads Act application is recommended to avoid delays in obtaining a Construction Certificate. An engineering assessment and inspection fee (set out in Council’s adopted fees and charges) is payable and Council will withhold any consent and approved plans until full payment of the correct fees. Plans and specifications must be marked to the attention of Council’s Development Engineers. In addition, a copy of this condition must be provided, together with a covering letter stating the full address of the property and the accompanying DA number.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the plans are suitable for construction purposes.

 

37.   Utility provider requirements

 

Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, the applicant must make contact with all relevant utility providers whose services will be impacted upon by the development. A written copy of the requirements of each provider, as determined necessary by the Certifying Authority, must be obtained.  All utility services or appropriate conduits for the same must be provided by the developer in accordance with the specifications of the utility providers.

 

Reason:         To ensure compliance with the requirements of relevant utility providers.

 

38.   Underground services

 

All electrical services (existing and proposed) shall be undergrounded from the proposed building on the site to the appropriate power pole(s) or other connection point. Undergrounding of services must not disturb the root system of existing trees and shall be undertaken in accordance with the requirements of the relevant service provided. Documentary evidence that the relevant service provider has been consulted and that their requirements have been met are to be provided to the Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate. All electrical and telephone services to the subject property must be placed underground and any redundant poles are to be removed at the expense of the applicant.

 

Reason:         To provide infrastructure that facilitates the future improvement of the streetscape by relocation of overhead lines below ground.

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of the construction certificate or prior to demolition, excavation or construction (whichever comes first):

 

39.   Infrastructure restorations fee

 

To ensure that damage to Council Property as a result of construction activity is rectified in a timely matter:

 

a)      All work or activity taken in furtherance of the development the subject of this approval must be undertaken in a manner to avoid damage to Council Property and must not jeopardise the safety of any person using or occupying the adjacent public areas.

 

b)      The applicant, builder, developer or any person acting in reliance on this approval shall be responsible for making good any damage to Council Property, and for the removal from Council Property of any waste bin, building materials, sediment, silt, or any other material or article.

 

c)      The Infrastructure Restoration Fee must be paid to the Council by the applicant prior to both the issue of the Construction Certificate and the commencement of any earthworks or construction.

 

d)      In consideration of payment of the Infrastructure Restorations Fee, Council will undertake such inspections of Council Property as Council considers necessary and also undertake, on behalf of the applicant, such restoration work to Council Property, if any, that Council considers necessary as a consequence of the development. The provision of such restoration work by the Council does not absolve any person of the responsibilities contained in (a) to (b) above. Restoration work to be undertaken by the Council referred to in this condition is limited to work that can be undertaken by Council at a cost of not more than the Infrastructure Restorations Fee payable pursuant to this condition.

 

e)      In this condition:

 

“Council Property” includes any road, footway, footpath paving, kerbing, guttering, crossings, street furniture, seats, letter bins, trees, shrubs, lawns, mounds, bushland, and similar structures or features on any road or public road within the meaning of the Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) or any public place; and

 

“Infrastructure Restoration Fee” means the Infrastructure Restorations Fee calculated in accordance with the Schedule of Fees & Charges adopted by Council as at the date of payment and the cost of any inspections required by the Council of Council Property associated with this condition.

 

Reason:         To maintain public infrastructure.

 

40.   Section 94 Contributions

 

This development is subject to a development contribution calculated in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010, being a s94 Contributions Plan in effect under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, as follows:

 

Key Community Infrastructure

Amount

LGA Wide Local Recreational & Cultural

$11,458.32

Turramurra TC New Roads & Road Mods

$20,665.61

Turramurra TC Local Parks & Sporting Facilities

$72,211.12

Turramurra TC Townscape Transport & Pedest Fac

$60,037.15

 

Total:

$164,372.20

 

The contribution shall be paid to Council prior to the issue of any Construction Certificate, Linen Plan, Certificate of Subdivision or Occupation Certificate whichever comes first in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010.

 

The contributions specified above are subject to indexation and will continue to be indexed to reflect changes in the consumer price index and housing price index until they are paid in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 to reflect changes in the consumer price index and housing price index.  Prior to payment, please contact Council directly to verify the current payable contributions.

 

Copies of Council’s Contribution Plans can be viewed at Council Chambers, 818 Pacific Hwy Gordon or on Council’s website at www.kmc.nsw.gov.au.

 

Reason:       To ensure the provision, extension or augmentation of the Key Community Infrastructure identified in Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 that will, or is likely to be, required as a consequence of the development.

 

Conditions to be satisfied during the demolition, excavation and construction phases:

 

41.   Prescribed conditions

 

The applicant shall comply with any relevant prescribed conditions of development consent under clause 98 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation. For the purposes of section 80A (11) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, the following conditions are prescribed in relation to a development consent for development that involves any building work:

 

·       The work must be carried out in accordance with the requirements of the Building Code of Australia

·       In the case of residential building work for which the Home Building Act 1989 requires there to be a contract of insurance in force in accordance with Part 6 of that Act, that such a contract of insurance is in force before any works commence.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

42.   Hours of work

 

Demolition, excavation, construction work and deliveries of building material and equipment must not take place outside the hours of 7.00am to 5.00pm Monday to Friday and 8.00am to 12 noon Saturday. No work and no deliveries are to take place on Sundays and public holidays.

 

Excavation or removal of any materials using machinery of any kind, including compressors and jack hammers, must be limited to between 7.30am and 5.00pm Monday to Friday, with a respite break of 45 minutes between 12 noon 1.00pm.

 

Where it is necessary for works to occur outside of these hours (ie) placement of concrete for large floor areas on large residential/commercial developments or where building processes require the use of oversized trucks and/or cranes that are restricted by the RTA from travelling during daylight hours to deliver, erect or remove machinery, tower cranes, pre-cast panels, beams, tanks or service equipment to or from the site, approval for such activities will be subject to the issue of an "outside of hours works permit" from Council as well as notification of the surrounding properties likely to be affected by the proposed works.

 

Note:     Failure to obtain a permit to work outside of the approved hours will result in on the spot fines being issued.

 

Reason:         To ensure reasonable standards of amenity for occupants of neighbouring properties.

 

43.   Temporary irrigation

 

Temporary irrigation within the Tree Protection Fencing is to be provided.  Irrigation volumes are to be determined by the Project Arborist.

 

Reason:         To protect trees to be retained on site.

 

44.   Approved plans to be on site

 

A copy of all approved and certified plans, specifications and documents incorporating conditions of consent and certification (including the Construction Certificate if required for the work) shall be kept on site at all times during the demolition, excavation and construction phases and must be readily available to any officer of Council or the Principal Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

45.   Statement of compliance with Australian Standards

 

The demolition work shall comply with the provisions of Australian Standard AS2601: 2001 The Demolition of Structures. The work plans required by AS2601: 2001 shall be accompanied by a written statement from a suitably qualified person that the proposal contained in the work plan comply with the safety requirements of the Standard. The work plan and the statement of compliance shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the commencement of any works.

 

Reason:         To ensure compliance with the Australian Standards.

 

46.   Site notice

 

A site notice shall be erected on the site prior to any work commencing and shall be displayed throughout the works period.

 

The site notice must:

 

·       be prominently displayed at the boundaries of the site for the purposes of informing the public that unauthorised entry to the site is not permitted

·       display project details including, but not limited to the details of the builder, Principal Certifying Authority and structural engineer

·       be durable and weatherproof

·       display the approved hours of work, the name of the site/project manager, the responsible managing company (if any), its address and 24 hour contact phone number for any inquiries, including construction/noise complaint are to be displayed on the site notice

·       be mounted at eye level on the perimeter hoardings/fencing and is to state that unauthorised entry to the site is not permitted

 

Reason:         To ensure public safety and public information.

 

47.   Dust control

 

During excavation, demolition and construction, adequate measures shall be taken to prevent dust from affecting the amenity of the neighbourhood. The following measures must be adopted:

 

·       physical barriers shall be erected at right angles to the prevailing wind direction or shall be placed around or over dust sources to prevent wind or activity from generating dust

·       earthworks and scheduling activities shall be managed to coincide with the next stage of development to minimise the amount of time the site is left cut or exposed

·       all materials shall be stored or stockpiled at the best locations

·       the ground surface should be dampened slightly to prevent dust from becoming airborne but should not be wet to the extent that run-off occurs

·       all vehicles carrying spoil or rubble to or from the site shall at all times be covered to prevent the escape of dust

·       all equipment wheels shall be washed before exiting the site using manual or automated sprayers and drive-through washing bays

·       gates shall be closed between vehicle movements and shall be fitted with shade cloth

·       cleaning of footpaths and roadways shall be carried out daily

 

Reason:         To protect the environment and amenity of surrounding properties.

 

48.   Post-construction dilapidation report

 

The applicant shall engage a suitably qualified person to prepare a post construction dilapidation report at the completion of the construction works. This report is to ascertain whether the construction works created any structural damage to adjoining buildings, infrastructure and roads. The report is to be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority. In ascertaining whether adverse structural damage has occurred to adjoining buildings, infrastructure and roads, the Principal Certifying Authority must:

 

·       compare the post-construction dilapidation report with the pre-construction dilapidation report

·       have written confirmation from the relevant authority that there is no adverse structural damage to their infrastructure and roads.

 

A copy of this report is to be forwarded to Council at the completion of the construction works.

 

Reason:         Management of records.

 

49.   Compliance with submitted geotechnical report

 

A contractor with specialist excavation experience must undertake the excavations for the development and a suitably qualified and consulting geotechnical engineer must oversee excavation.

 

Geotechnical aspects of the development work, namely:

 

·       appropriate excavation method and vibration control

·       support and retention of excavated faces

·       hydro-geological considerations

 

must be undertaken in accordance with the recommendations of the geotechnical report 12097/GK/1, dated September 2012, prepared by GDK, Keighran Geotechnics. Approval must be obtained from all affected property owners, including Ku-ring-gai Council, where rock anchors (both temporary and permanent) are proposed below adjoining property(ies).

 

Reason:         To ensure the safety and protection of property.

 

50.   Use of road or footpath

 

During excavation, demolition and construction phases, no building materials, plant or the like are to be stored on the road or footpath without written approval being obtained from Council beforehand.  The pathway shall be kept in a clean, tidy and safe condition during building operations.  Council reserves the right, without notice, to rectify any such breach and to charge the cost against the applicant/owner/builder, as the case may be.

 

Reason:         To ensure safety and amenity of the area.

 

51.   Toilet facilities

 

During excavation, demolition and construction phases, toilet facilities are to be provided, on the work site, at the rate of one toilet for every 20 persons or part of 20 persons employed at the site.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

52.   Protection of public places

 

If the work involved in the erection, demolition or construction of the development is likely to cause pedestrian or vehicular traffic in a public place to be obstructed or rendered inconvenient, or building involves the enclosure of a public place, a hoarding or fence must be erected between the work site and the public place.

 

If necessary, a hoarding is to be erected, sufficient to prevent any substance from, or in connection with, the work falling into the public place.

 

The work site must be kept lit between sunset and sunrise if it is likely to be hazardous to persons in the public place.

 

Any hoarding, fence or awning is to be removed when the work has been completed.

 

Reason:         To protect public places.

 

53.   Recycling of building material (general)

 

During demolition and construction, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that building materials suitable for recycling have been forwarded to an appropriate registered business dealing in recycling of materials. Materials to be recycled must be kept in good order.

 

Reason:         To facilitate recycling of materials.

 

54.   Construction signage

 

All construction signs must comply with the following requirements:

 

·       are not to cover any mechanical ventilation inlet or outlet vent

·       are not illuminated, self-illuminated or flashing at any time

·       are located wholly within a property where construction is being undertaken

·       refer only to the business(es) undertaking the construction and/or the site at which the construction is being undertaken

·       are restricted to one such sign per property

·       do not exceed 2.5m2

·       are removed within 14 days of the completion of all construction works

 

Reason:         To ensure compliance with Council's controls regarding signage.

 

55.   Road reserve safety

 

All public footways and roadways fronting and adjacent to the site must be maintained in a safe condition at all times during the course of the development works. Construction materials must not be stored in the road reserve. A safe pedestrian circulation route and a pavement/route free of trip hazards must be maintained at all times on or adjacent to any public access ways fronting the construction site.  Where public infrastructure is damaged, repair works must be carried out when and as directed by Council officers. Where pedestrian circulation is diverted on to the roadway or verge areas, clear directional signage and protective barricades must be installed in accordance with AS1742-3 (1996) “Traffic Control Devices for Work on Roads”. If pedestrian circulation is not satisfactorily maintained across the site frontage, and action is not taken promptly to rectify the defects, Council may undertake proceedings to stop work.

 

Reason:         To ensure safe public footways and roadways during construction.

 

56.   Services

 

Where required, the adjustment or inclusion of any new utility service facilities must be carried out by the applicant and in accordance with the requirements of the relevant utility authority. These works shall be at no cost to Council. It is the applicants’ full responsibility to make contact with the relevant utility authorities to ascertain the impacts of the proposal upon utility services (including water, phone, gas and the like). Council accepts no responsibility for any matter arising from its approval to this application involving any influence upon utility services provided by another authority.

 

Reason:         Provision of utility services.

 

57.   Erosion control

 

Temporary sediment and erosion control and measures are to be installed prior to the commencement of any works on the site. These measures must be maintained in working order during construction works up to completion. All sediment traps must be cleared on a regular basis and after each major storm and/or as directed by the Principal Certifying Authority and Council officers.

 

Reason:         To protect the environment from erosion and sedimentation.

 

58.   Drainage to street

 

Stormwater runoff from all new impervious areas and subsoil drainage systems shall be piped to the street drainage system.  New drainage line connections to the street drainage system shall conform and comply with the requirements of Sections 5.3 and 5.4 of Ku-ring-gai Water Management Development Control Plan No. 47.

 

Reason:         To protect the environment.

 

59.   Grated drain at garage

 

A 200mm wide grated channel/trench drain, with a heavy-duty removable galvanised grate is to be provided in front of the garage door/basement parking slab to collect driveway runoff. The channel drain shall be connected to the main drainage system and must have an outlet of minimum diameter 150mm to prevent blockage by silt and debris.

 

Reason:         Stormwater control.

 

60.   Sydney Water Section 73 Compliance Certificate

 

The applicant must obtain a Section 73 Compliance Certificate under the Sydney Water Act 1994. An application must be made through an authorised Water Servicing Co-ordinator. The applicant is to refer to “Your Business” section of Sydney Water’s web site at www.sydneywater.com.au then the “e-develop” icon or telephone 13 20 92. Following application a “Notice of Requirements” will detail water and sewer extensions to be built and charges to be paid. Please make early contact with the Co-ordinator, since building of water/sewer extensions can be time consuming and may impact on other services and building, driveway or landscape design.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

 

 

61.   Arborist’s report

 

The trees to be retained shall be inspected, monitored and treated by a Project Arborist who must be a qualified (AQF) Level 5 arborist in accordance with AS4970-2009 Protection of trees on development sites.  Regular inspections and documentation from the Project Arborist to the Principal Certifying Authority are required including at the following times or phases of work. All monitoring shall be recorded and provided to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to completion of the works.  


 

Schedule

Tree/location

Time of inspection

Tree 4/ Lophostemon confertus (Brushbox) located within the front setback

Excavation for landscape wall. Minor level changes to be in accordance with arborist recommendations, Table 6, Arboricultural Impact Report, Landscape Matrix, 2012.

Tree 5/ Lophostemon confertus (Brushbox) located at the north-east corner of the site, within the front setback

Excavation for pathway. Minor level changes to be in accordance with arborist recommendations,  Table 6, Arboricultural Impact Report, Landscape Matrix, 2012. 

Tree 9/ Phoenix canariensis (Canary Island Palm) located in the rear yard, west of Block C

Construction of pathway at grade, excavation for footings of Block C within tree protection zone.

Tree 10/ Lophostemon confertus (Brushbox) located on southern boundary

Construction of pathway at grade. 

Tree 13/ Harpephyllum caffrum (Kaffir Plum) located on southern boundary

Construction of pathway at grade. 

Tree 17/ Cupressus macrocarpa ‘Aurea’ (Monterey Cypress – Gold Form) located on the western boundary of rear yard, within the adjoining property

Excavation for the basement 

Tree 20/ Melia azedarach 'Australasica' (White Cedar) located on western boundary

Excavation for the basement 

Tree 25/ Jacaranda mimosifolia (Jacaranda) located at north-west corner of site

Excavation for the retaining wall 

 

Reason:         To ensure protection of existing trees.

 

62.   Canopy/root pruning

 

Canopy and/or root pruning of the following tree(s) which is necessary to accommodate the approved building works shall be undertaken by an experienced AQF level 3 Arborist under the supervision of the Project Arborist and in accordance with the reduction pruning clause of AS4373-2007. All other branches are to be tied back and protected during construction, under the supervision of a qualified arborist.

 

 

 

Schedule

Tree/location

Tree works

Tree 9/ Phoenix canariensis (Canary Island Palm) located in the rear yard, west of Block C

Minor root pruning for building footings

Tree 17/ Cupressus macrocarpa ‘Aurea’ (Monterey Cypress – Gold Form) located on the western boundary of rear yard, within the adjoining property

Minor root pruning for basement

Tree 20/ Melia azedarach 'Australasica' (White Cedar) located on western boundary

Minor root pruning for basement

Tree 25/ Jacaranda mimosifolia (Jacaranda) located at north-west corner of site

Minor root pruning for the retaining wall

 

Reason:         To protect the environment.

 

63.   Treatment of tree roots

 

If tree roots are required to be severed for the purposes of constructing the approved works, they shall be cut cleanly by hand, by an experienced Arborist/Horticulturist with a minimum qualification of Horticulture Certificate or Tree Surgery Certificate.  All pruning works shall be undertaken as specified in Australian Standard 4373-2007 – Pruning of Amenity Trees.

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees.

 

64.   Hand excavation

 

All excavation (excluding for the basement) within the specified radius of the trunk(s) of the following tree(s) shall be hand dug under the supervision of the Project Arborist.

 

Schedule

Tree/location

Radius

Tree 4/ Lophostemon confertus (Brushbox) located within the

front setback

13m

Tree 5/ Lophostemon confertus (Brushbox) located at the

north-east corner of the site, within the front setback

8m

Tree 9/ Phoenix canariensis (Canary Island Palm) located in

the rear yard, west of Block C

4m

Tree 10/ Lophostemon confertus (Brushbox) located on southern boundary

12.5m

Tree 13/ Harpephyllum caffrum (Kaffir Plum) located on southern boundary

12.5m

Tree 17/ Cupressus macrocarpa ‘Aurea’ (Monterey Cy press – Gold Form) located on the western boundary of rear yard, within the adjoining property

10m

Tree 20/ Melia azedarach 'Australasica' (White Cedar) located

on western boundary

5m

Tree 25/ Jacaranda mimosifolia (Jacaranda) located at north-west corner of site

5m

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees.

 

65.   No storage of materials beneath trees

 

No activities, storage or disposal of materials shall take place beneath the canopy of any tree protected under Council's Tree Preservation Order at any time.

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees.

 

66.   Removal of refuse

 

All builders' refuse, spoil and/or material unsuitable for use in landscape areas shall be removed from the site on completion of the building works.

 

Reason:         To protect the environment.

 

67.   Canopy replenishment trees to be planted

 

The canopy replenishment trees to be planted shall be maintained in a healthy and vigorous condition until they attain a height of 5.0 metres whereby they will be protected by Council’s Tree Preservation Order.  Any of the trees found faulty, damaged, dying or dead shall be replaced with the same species.

 

Reason:         To maintain the treed character of the area.

 

68.   On site retention of waste dockets

 

All demolition, excavation and construction waste dockets are to be retained on site, or at suitable location, in order to confirm which facility received materials generated from the site for recycling or disposal.

 

·       Each docket is to be an official receipt from a facility authorised to accept the material type, for disposal or processing.

·       This information is to be made available at the request of an Authorised Officer of Council.

 

Reason:       To protect the environment.

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate:

 

69.   Compliance with BASIX Certificate

 

Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that all commitments listed in BASIX Certificate No.440332M_04 have been complied with.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

70.   Clotheslines and clothes dryers

 

Prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the units either have access to an external clothes line located in common open space or have a mechanical clothes dryer installed.

 

Reason:         To provide access to clothes drying facilities.

 

71.   Mechanical ventilation

 

Following completion, installation and testing of all the mechanical ventilation systems, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied of the following prior to the issue of any Occupation Certificate:

 

1.      The installation and performance of the mechanical systems complies with:

 

·       The Building Code of Australia

·       Australian Standard AS1668

·       Australian Standard AS3666 where applicable

 

2.      The mechanical ventilation system in isolation and in association with other mechanical ventilation equipment, when in operation will not be audible within a habitable room in any other residential premises before 7am and after 10pm Monday to Friday and before 8am and after 10pm Saturday, Sunday and public holidays. The operation of the unit outside these restricted hours shall emit a noise level of not greater than 5dbA above the background when measured at the nearest adjoining boundary.

 

Note:     Written confirmation from an acoustic engineer that the development achieves the above requirements is to be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate.

 

Reason:         To protect the amenity of surrounding properties.

 

72.   Completion of landscape works

 

Prior to the release of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that all landscape works, including the removal of all noxious and/or environmental weed species, have been undertaken in accordance with the approved plan(s) and conditions of consent.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the landscape works are consistent with the development consent.

 

73.   Completion of tree works

 

Prior to the release of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that all tree works, including pruning in accordance with AS4373-2007 or remediation works in accordance with AS4370-2009, have been undertaken in accordance with the approved plan(s) and conditions of consent.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the tree works are consistent with the development consent.

 

74.   Accessibility

 

Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that:

 

·       the lift design and associated functions are compliant with AS 1735.12 & AS 1428.2

·       the level and direction of travel, both in lifts and lift lobbies, is audible and visible

·       the controls for lifts are accessible to all persons and control buttons and lettering are raised

·       international symbols have been used with specifications relating to signs, symbols and size of lettering complying with AS 1428.2

·       the height of lettering on signage is in accordance with AS 1428.1 – 1993

·       the signs and other information indicating access and services incorporate tactile communication methods in addition to the visual methods

 

Reason:         Disabled access & services.

 

75.   Provision of copy of OSD designs if Council is not the PCA

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the following must be provided to Council’s Development Engineer:

 

·       A copy of the approved Construction Certificate stormwater detention/retention design for the site

·       A copy of any works-as-executed drawings required by this consent

·       The Engineer’s certification of the as-built system.

 

Reason:         For Council to maintain its database of as-constructed on-site stormwater detention systems.

 

76.   Certification of drainage works

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that:

 

·       the stormwater drainage works have been satisfactorily completed in accordance with the approved Construction Certificate drainage plans

·       the minimum retention and on-site detention storage volume requirements of BASIX and Ku-ring-gai Water Management Development Control Plan No. 47 respectively, have been achieved

·       retained water is connected and available for use

·       basement and subsoil areas are able to drain via a pump/sump system installed in accordance with AS3500.3 and Appendix 7.1.1 of Ku-ring-gai Water Management Development Control Plan No. 47

·       all grates potentially accessible by children are secured

·       components of the new drainage system have been installed by a licensed plumbing contractor in accordance with the Plumbing and Drainage Code AS3500.3 2003 and the Building Code of Australia

·       all enclosed floor areas, including habitable and garage floor levels, are safeguarded from outside stormwater runoff ingress by suitable differences in finished levels, gradings and provision of stormwater collection devices

 

The rainwater certification sheet contained in Appendix 13 of the Ku-ring-gai Water Management Development Control Plan No. 47, must be completed and attached to the certification. Where an on-site detention system has been constructed, the on-site detention certification sheet contained in Appendix 4 of DCP 47 must also be completed and attached to the certification.

 

Note:     Evidence from a qualified and experienced consulting civil/hydraulic engineer documenting compliance with the above is to be provided to Council prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate.

 

Reason:         To protect the environment.

 

77.   WAE plans for stormwater management and disposal (dual occupancy and above)

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, a registered surveyor must provide a works as executed survey of the completed stormwater drainage and management systems. The survey must be submitted to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate. The survey must indicate:

 

·       as built (reduced) surface and invert levels for all drainage pits

·       gradients of drainage lines, materials and dimensions

·       as built (reduced) level(s) at the approved point of discharge to the public drainage system

·       as built location and internal dimensions of all detention and retention structures on the property (in plan view) and horizontal distances to nearest adjacent boundaries and structures on site

·       the achieved storage volumes of the installed retention and detention storages and derivative calculations

·       as built locations of all access pits and grates in the detention and retention system(s), including dimensions

·       the size of the orifice or control fitted to any on-site detention system

·       dimensions of the discharge control pit and access grates

·       the maximum depth of storage possible over the outlet control

·       top water levels of storage areas and indicative RL’s through the overland flow path in the event of blockage of the on-site detention system

 

The works as executed plan(s) must show the as built details above in comparison to those shown on the drainage plans approved with the Construction Certificate prior to commencement of works. All relevant levels and details indicated must be marked in red on a copy of the Principal Certifying Authority stamped construction certificate stormwater plans.

 

Reason:         To protect the environment.

 

78.   OSD positive covenant/restriction

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the applicant must create a positive covenant and restriction on the use of land under Section 88E of the Conveyancing Act 1919, burdening the owner with the requirement to maintain the on-site stormwater detention facilities on the lot.

 

The terms of the instruments are to be generally in accordance with the Council's "draft terms of Section 88B instrument for protection of on-site detention facilities" and to the satisfaction of Council (refer to appendices of Ku-ring-gai Council Water Management DCP 47). For existing titles, the positive covenant and the restriction on the use of land is to be created through an application to the Land Titles Office in the form of a request using forms 13PC and 13RPA. The relative location of the on-site detention facility, in relation to the building footprint, must be shown on a scale sketch, attached as an annexure to the request forms.

 

Registered title documents, showing the covenants and restrictions, must be submitted and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate.

 

Reason:         To protect the environment.

 

79.   Sydney Water Section 73 Compliance Certificate

 

Prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate the Section 73 Sydney water Compliance Certificate must be obtained and submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

80.   Reinstatement of redundant crossings and completion of infrastructure works

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority must be satisfied that he or she has received a signed inspection form from Council which states that the following works in the road reserve have been completed:

 

·       new concrete driveway crossing in accordance with levels and specifications issued by Council

·       removal of all redundant driveway crossings and kerb laybacks (or sections thereof) and reinstatement of these areas to footpath, turfed verge and upright kerb and gutter (reinstatement works to match surrounding adjacent infrastructure with respect to integration of levels and materials)

·       full repair and resealing of any road surface damaged during construction

·       full replacement of damaged sections of grass verge to match existing

 

This inspection may not be carried out by the Private Certifier because restoration of Council property outside the boundary of the site is not a matter listed in Clause 161 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000.

 

All works must be completed in accordance with the General Specification for the Construction of Road and Drainage Works in Ku-ring-gai Council, dated November 2004. The Occupation Certificate must not be issued until all damaged public infrastructure caused as a result of construction works on the subject site (including damage caused by, but not limited to, delivery vehicles, waste collection, contractors, sub contractors, concrete vehicles) is fully repaired to the satisfaction of Council. Repair works shall be at no cost to Council.

 

Reason:         To protect the streetscape.

 

81.   Infrastructure repair

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority must be satisfied that any damaged public infrastructure caused as a result of construction works (including damage caused by, but not limited to, delivery vehicles, waste collection, contractors, sub contractors, concrete vehicles) is fully repaired to the satisfaction of Council Development Engineer and at no cost to Council.

 

Reason:         To protect public infrastructure.

 

82.   Mechanical ventilation

 

Prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that all mechanical ventilation systems are installed in accordance with Part F4.5 of the Building Code of Australia and comply with Australian Standards AS1668.2 and AS3666 Microbial Control of Air Handling and Water Systems of Building.

 

Reason:         To ensure adequate levels of health and amenity to the occupants of the building.

 

83.   Restriction on land title – seniors living development

 

Prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that restriction as to use of land under Section 88E of the Conveyancing Act 1919, has been created restricting the occupation of the premises to:

 

·       people 55 or over or people who have a disability

·       people who live with people 55 or over or people who have a disability

·       staff employed to assist in the administration of and provision of services to housing provided in this development

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development meets the provisions of the Seniors Living SEPP.

 

84.   SEPP Seniors Living Advertising

 

All advertising, signage, marketing or promotion of the sale of the dwellings in this development shall make clear reference to the fact that this is a SEPP Seniors Living development and that at least one occupier shall be aged 55 years or over or have a disability.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development meets the provisions of the Seniors Living SEPP.

 

85.   Construction Standards - Housing for Seniors or People with a Disability.

 

Prior to the issue of an occupation certificate or occupation of the development (what ever comes first), certification shall be provided from an accredited access consultant to the certifying authority which demonstrates that the fit out and construction of the development satisfies the design criteria of SEPP (Housing for Seniors or People with a Disability) 2004.

 

Reason:   To ensure compliance with SEPP (Housing for Seniors or People with a Disability) 2004.

 

Conditions to be satisfied at all times:

 

86.   Noise control – plant and machinery

 

All noise generating equipment associated with any proposed mechanical ventilation system/s shall be located and/or soundproofed so the equipment is not audible within a habitable room in any other residential premises before 7am and after 10pm Monday to Friday and before 8am and after 10pm Saturday, Sunday and public holidays.  The operation of the unit outside these restricted hours shall emit a noise level of not greater than 5dbA above the background when measured at the nearest boundary.

 

Reason:         To protect the amenity of surrounding residents.

 

87.     Servicing of waste bins

 

On the night prior to the waste bins being serviced by Council, the occupiers of each unit are place to the waste receptacles out the front of each unit for servicing. Where the resident is unable to undertake this, it is the responsibility of the sites owner or body corporate to undertake this.

 

Reason: To ensure the amenity of the development.

 

88.   Outdoor lighting

 

At all times for the life of the approved development, all outdoor lighting shall not detrimentally impact upon the amenity of other premises and adjacent dwellings and shall comply with, where relevant, AS/NZ1158.3: 1999 Pedestrian Area (Category P) Lighting and AS4282: 1997 Control of the Obtrusive Effects of Outdoor Lighting.

 

Reason:    To protect the amenity of surrounding properties

 

89.   Car parking

 

At all times, the visitor car parking spaces are to be clearly identified and are to be for the exclusive use of visitors to the site. On site permanent car parking spaces are not to be used by those other than an occupant or tenant of the subject building. Any occupant, tenant, lessee or registered proprietor of the development site or part thereof shall not enter into an agreement to lease, license or transfer ownership of any car parking spaces to those other than an occupant, tenant or lessee of the building.  These requirements are to be enforced through the following:

 

·       restrictive covenant placed on title pursuant to Section 88B of the Conveyancing Act, 1919

·       restriction on use under Section 68 of the Strata Schemes (Leasehold Development) Act, 1986 to all lots comprising in part or whole car parking spaces

 

Reason:    To ensure adequate provision of visitor parking spaces

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rebecca Hoschke

Executive Assessment Officer

 

 

 

 

Richard Kinninmont

Team Leader- Development Assessment - Central

 

 

 

 

Corrie Swanepoel

Manager Development Assessment Services

 

 

 

 

Michael Miocic

Director Development & Regulation

 

 

Attachments:

A1View

Location sketch

 

2013/019083

 

A2View

Zoning Extract

 

2013/019079

 

A3View

Architectural Plans

 

2012/302265

 

A4View

Landscape plans

 

2012/302272

 

A5View

Hydraulic engineer diagrams

 

2012/301973

 

A6View

Access report

 

2012/228401

  


APPENDIX No: 1 - Location sketch

 

Item No: GB.10

 


APPENDIX No: 2 - Zoning Extract

 

Item No: GB.10

 


APPENDIX No: 3 - Architectural Plans

 

Item No: GB.10

 










APPENDIX No: 4 - Landscape plans

 

Item No: GB.10

 







APPENDIX No: 5 - Hydraulic engineer diagrams

 

Item No: GB.10

 





APPENDIX No: 6 - Access report

 

Item No: GB.10

 

























 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 5 February 2013

GB.11 / 290

 

 

Item GB.11

CY00054/5

 

20 November 2012

 

 

 

Draft Local Centres

Development Control Plan for exhibition

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

purpose of report:

For Council to consider the draft of the Ku-ring-gai Local Centres Development Control Plan (Attachment 1) for public exhibition.

 

 

background:

The Ku-ring-gai (Local Centres) Local Environment Plan 2012 was gazetted on 25 January 2013. Detailed guidelines are required to support the new LEP.

 

 

comments:

The draft Local Centres DCP provides detailed provisions to guide the design and assessment of development under the Ku-ring-gai LEP (Local Centres) 2012. While the DCP provides more detailed provision with respect to development to achieve the purpose of the LEP, it cannot be inconsistent with any of the provisions of the LEP.

 

 

recommendation:

That Council endorse the draft Ku-ring-gai (Local Centres) DCP for public exhibition.

 

 

 


 

Purpose of Report

 

For Council to consider the draft of the Ku-ring-gai Local Centres Development Control Plan (Attachment 1) for public exhibition. 

 

Background

 

The Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan (Local Centres) 2012 (KLEP2012) was gazetted on
25 January 2013. It provides zoning, land uses and higher order standards for certain lands within Gordon, Turramurra, Pymble, St Ives, Lindfield and Roseville (referred to as ‘local centres’ in this report). Detailed guidelines are now required to support the achievement of the objectives within this new LEP.

 

The draft DCP has been prepared to provide guidelines for development for Ku-ring-gai’s main centres under KLEP 2012. While the draft DCP provides detailed provisions to guide the design and assessment of development to achieve the stated aims and purpose of KLEP 2012, it cannot be inconsistent with any of the provision of the LEP nor prevent compliance with any provision of the LEP.

 

The draft DCP establishes a framework for future development in the Ku-ring-gai local centres by specifying a series of urban strategies to help achieve the desired future vision for each respective centre. The planning framework contained in this draft DCP adopts a place-based planning approach by defining the desired future character for each centre and developing a place-specific built form, supported by design and environmental objectives, design principles and detailed controls aimed at achieving a high quality built environment, landscape setting and community spaces. It also identifies future community infrastructure to be provided via the Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010.

 

The draft DCP has taken into account, where relevant, the significant work of the Town Centres

Development Control Plan adopted by Council in 2010 to support the former Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan (Local Centres) 2010. However, where appropriate, a number of changes have been made to respond to significant changes between KLEP 2010 and KLEP 2012.

 

The draft DCP also takes into account and is consistent with the relevant State Planning Policies, such as State Environmental Planning Policy No 65 and the NSW Residential Flat Design Code. The draft DCP repeals all existing development control plans applying to the land to which the new draft DCP applies.

 

Comments

 

The draft Ku-ring-gai (Local Centres) DCP establishes a framework for future development in the local centres under the new zoning and development standards introduced by KLEP 2012.

 

The general aims of the draft DCP are as follows:

 

·    Establish a future character for Ku-ring-gai’s local centres;

·    Provide high quality public spaces and streets;

·    Encourage the provision of a range of building types which provide for increased housing choice, diversity of employment opportunities, access to retail and commercial services and other activities that contribute to a sustainable vibrant community;

·    Ensure high quality sustainable urban design and architectural design of buildings;

·    Encourage the provision of a range of building types which provide for increased housing choice, diversity of employment opportunities, access to retail and commercial services and other activities that contribute to a sustainable vibrant community;

·    Ensure buildings and other development have a good relationship with neighbouring developments, the public domain and the landscape qualities of the locality;

·    Ensure a high level of residential amenity in building design for the occupants of buildings, including daylight access, acoustic control, privacy protection, natural ventilation, design for safety, outdoor living, landscape design, indoor amenity and storage provision;

·    Promote the principles of ecologically sustainable development including water sensitive urban design, climate responsive building design, energy efficiency, and selection/use of building materials;

·    Ensure buildings and landscaping are designed for all age groups and degrees of mobility;

·    Promote increased use of public transport, walking and cycling;

·    Provide traffic control measures and outcomes that manage and improve local traffic impacts and promote pedestrian safety;

·    Recognise the significance of heritage conservation areas, heritage items and their setting in future development;

·    Promote and support biodiversity conservation, riparian restoration and ecological integrity;

·    Ensure the long term survival of Ku-ring-gai’s native and exotic tree and vegetation cover;

·    Ensure the appropriate management of risks, such as flooding, bushfire and land contamination.

Currently, Council has a number of DCPs for different topics – such as design for business zones, dwelling houses, waste management and car parking. Section 74(c) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act (EP&A Act) requires that only one DCP apply to any piece of land. Accordingly, the Local Centres DCP needs to include detailed design controls for a large range of development types and aspects of development permitted within the Local Centres under the new LEP.

 

As a consequence of being a comprehensive DCP, the document is of substantial size when printed in hard copy. However, the DCP is designed to be accessed and negotiated electronically, allowing users to bypass non relevant aspects of the DCP for particular development types. Navigation is aided by the incorporation of hyperlinks between associated sections within the DCP and also to other relevant supporting technical documents.  

 

In order to streamline the use of the DCP during the development design process, the order of the different parts of the DCP is generally consistent with the order of the design process, although it is recognised that this will not be the same for all designers.

 

KEY ELEMENTS OF THE DRAFT DCP

 

The planning framework contained in the draft DCP adopts a place-based planning approach, supported by design and environmental objectives and detailed controls aimed at achieving a high quality built environment, landscape setting and community spaces. These are supported by diagrams and photos.

 

Objectives

 

The objectives contained in the draft DCP outline the outcomes that proposed developments are required to achieve. In order to gain consent, developments need to demonstrate that they have fulfilled the relevant objectives for each element.

 

Controls

 

The design controls demonstrate the preferred ways in which the objectives are to be achieved for improving site and building design. The controls focus on building performance/functionality, form, layout, sustainability and residential amenity. Controls may be varied, provided that it can be demonstrated that the objectives for that particular element have been achieved and that it results in a reasonable planning outcome.

 

Diagrams and photos 

 

The diagrams and photos illustrate particular provisions and are only to be used for the specific provision being illustrated.

 

Hyperlinks

 

To facilitate easy referencing between different volumes and parts, hyperlinks are to be provided in the e-version of the Draft DCP in the boxes in the bottom left corner of many pages. The colour of the box is the same as the signature colour of the volume being referenced.

 

SET OUT OF THE DRAFT DCP

 

The DCP is set out within three volumes, each with a number of parts. The volumes are designed to be used together to inform the design process. The following diagram visually represents the interrelationships between the volumes and parts.

 

Volume A

 

Parts 1 and 2 of Volume A apply to all development types and are critical in:

 

·    understanding how to navigate through the DCP;

·    project feasibility assessment; and

·    the beginning of the design process.

 

They should be read in conjunction with the parts of Volume B that are applicable to the site.

Parts 3-14 of Volume A contain detailed provisions that apply to the main development types likely to be proposed on land covered by the KLEP (Local Centres) 2012. These provisions set parameters within which good building design can occur by illustrating the use of development controls and consistent guidelines for site and building design, which focus on building performance, functionality, form, layout and residential amenity.

They are intended to be read in conjunction with the relevant general provisions in Volume C.

Part 1: Introduction and Preliminary

·    Explains what a DCP is, and how to use the draft DCP.

·    Contains general statutory information about how the DCP was prepared, the general aims of the plan and its relationship to the KLEP 2012 and other planning and design documents.

Part 2: Site Analysis

·    Outlines the requirements for a site analysis. A site analysis is required for all development proposals. A thorough analysis of the site and its context enables the consideration of relevant issues at the earliest stage of the design process, minimising costs and delays while supporting good location based design.

Part 3: Land Amalgamation and Subdivision

·    Provides guidance on land amalgamation, preventing isolation of lots and the subdivision of lots.

Part 4: Dwelling House Controls

·    Contains provisions for dwelling houses and ancillary structures in the R2- Low density residential, E4 - Environmental living, R3 and R4 zones. The provisions are consistent with DCP 38.

Part 5: Secondary Dwelling Controls

·    Provides detailed provisions for secondary dwellings which are permissible in R2 and E4 zones under the KLEP 2012. These controls need to be read in conjunction with the relevant objectives and controls for dwelling houses in Part 4.

Part 6: Multi-Dwelling Housing Controls

·    Guides multi-dwelling housing developments within the R3 - Medium Density Residential and the R4 High Density Residential zones. Dwelling types can include detached and attached townhouse dwellings or villas. The provisions are similar to DCP 55.

Part 7: Residential Flat Building Controls

·    Guides development for residential flat buildings which are permissible in R4 -High Density Residential and the B4 Mixed Use zones. The provisions are similar to DCP 55.

Part 8: Mixed Use Development Controls

·    Guides new development for mixed use buildings within B2- Local Centre and B4 Mixed Use zones. As defined in the KLEP (Local Centres) 2012, a mixed use building is one which contains 2 or more uses. In the context of the Ku-ring-gai local centres, it is anticipated that mixed use buildings will typically contain the following uses:

retail or other commercial uses at ground and lower levels;

residential apartments and/or offices on upper levels.

·    Guides refurbishment and new business and retail development in the B2 Local Centre and B4 Mixed Use zones. These developments will typically be alterations and additions to existing retail or business premises, or single storey retail or business premises, that do not wish to provide residential development above at this time.

·    Guides the development and operation of commercial premises in residential flat buildings, where they are permitted by Schedule 1 (Additional Permitted Uses) of the KLEP 2012.

In the case of any inconsistency between the controls in Part 8 and those site specific controls in Volume B Part 1 Key Urban Precincts and Sites, the controls in Volume B Part 1 will prevail to the extent of that inconsistency.

Part 10: Office Building Controls

·    Guides office building developments within the B5- Business Development and B4- Mixed Use zones. For mixed use buildings, it applies to those parts of the building to be used for office purposes.

Part 11: Child Care Centre

·    Guides the development of child care centres. This part complements the provisions the Children (Education and Care Services national Law Application Act 2010 and the associated regulations.

Part 12: Sex Service Premises

·    Provides specific planning controls for Sex Services Premises and Home Occupation (Sex Services) Premises; This section should be read in conjunction with Clause 6.8 of the KLEP 2012 which identifies certain considerations regarding the location of sex services premises.

Part 13: Signage & Advertising

·    Guides signage and advertising structures. This section of the DCP should be read in conjunction with State Environmental Planning Policy No 64 - Advertising and Signage. It is noted that Schedule 2 of the KLEP 2012 makes certain signage and advertising permissible as exempt development.

Part 14: Tree and Vegetation Preservation

·    Contains requirements for the preservation of trees and vegetation on all land covered by the KLEP 2012. This part is made in accordance with Clause 5.9 of the KLEP 2012 and prescribes the trees and vegetation to which Clause 5.9 applies. It replaces the Tree Preservation Order for the lands to which KLEP 2012 applies.

·    Guides the protection, management and long term survival of Ku-ring-gai’s tree and vegetation resource both native and exotic. Tree and vegetation works that do not require Council consent are listed.

·    Establishes a framework for the submission of applications for tree and vegetation works in Ku-ring-gai.

Where trees are located on a heritage site or within a heritage conservation area, this part should be read in conjunction with Clause 5.10 of KLEP 2012 and Volume B Part 7 of the draft DCP.

 

Part 15: Dictionary

 

·    Provides a series of definitions to clarify terms used in this DCP. Terms used in the dictionary of the KLEP 2012 also apply to this DCP and must be used as defined in the KLEP 2012;

·    Lists the abbreviations used in the DCP.

 

Volume B

Volume B contains objectives and controls in relation to circumstances or values that may apply to a site or area, regardless of the zoning or the development type.

It is important to be aware very early in the development feasibility or design stage of Council’s expectations in matters such as special areas and sites, potential land contamination, the management of bushfire risk, the natural environment and cultural heritage, and safety and amenity close to railways or busy roads among others.

In the case of any inconsistency between the controls in other Volumes and those in Volume B, the controls in Volume B will prevail to the extent of the inconsistency.

 

Part 1: Key Urban Precincts and Sites

This part is structured to provide guidance for development on land identified as a ‘special area or site’. These sites are key areas within the local centres.  There are a number of components:

·    Precincts

·    Community Infrastructure

·    Building Setbacks

·    Built Form

·    Public Domain and Pedestrian Access

·    Building Entries, Car Parking and Service Access

 

For each of the special areas or sites a set of site-specific performance-based provisions are provided to guide development in addition to the other development controls in Volumes A, B and C of the DCP.

 

Part 2:  Site Design for Water Management

·    Supports clause 6.2 -Stormwater and Water Sensitive Urban Design in the KLEP 2012 and is preliminary to the Water Management section in Volume C.

·    Categorises;

development types, eg new dwellings or retail premises, and

site location by drainage patterns, eg draining towards the road, or draining towards bushland.

The development and location categories are used in Volume C Part 4 of this DCP to provide detailed guidance on how to manage the volume and quality of water on and off the site.

 

Part 3: Land Contamination

 

·    Requires the applicant to consider whether the site is contaminated. It contains provisions to ensure that the site is suitable, or can be made suitable, for the proposed development. It supplements State Environmental Planning Policy 55 – Remediation of Land.

 

Part 4: Bushfire Risk

 

·    Applies to land identified on Council’s Bushfire Prone Lands Map and/or Bushfire Risk Evacuation Map. It includes objectives and design controls to ensure that any development on these lands manages risk to life and property while protecting the ecological values of the site and surrounds. It complements Planning for Bushfire 2006.

 

Part 5: Riparian Lands

 

·    Supports the provisions of Clause 6.4 of the KLEP (Local Centres) 2012. It applies to all land identified within the Riparian Lands Map in the LEP.

 

·    Provides general guidance for development in riparian lands (including waterways) as well as additional guidance for development within specific categories of riparian lands identified on the Riparian Lands Map.

 

Part 6: Biodiversity Controls

 

·    Supports the provisions of Clause 6.3 of the KLEP (Local Centres) 2012. It applies to all land identified within the Natural Resource – Biodiversity Map in the LEP as well as to development that will have an impact on those lands.

 

·    Also applies to land identified as Category 5 Canopy Remnants on the Greenweb maps at Part 5R.1. Both the KLEP (Local Centres) 2012 and DCP maps need to be checked to determine whether the site is affected by this part.

 

In combination, these lands are referred to as the Greenweb for the purposes of this DCP.

 

Part 7: Heritage and Conservation Areas

 

·    Applies to any development that is:

on a Heritage Item listed under Schedule 5 Environmental Heritage within KLEP (Local Centres) 2012;

in a Heritage Conservation Area (HCA) identified in KLEP (Local Centres) 2012;

in the vicinity of a Heritage Item identified in KLEP (Local Centres) 2012.

 

This part includes objectives and design guidance to ensure that any development involving a heritage item conserves and enhances the item. It also seeks to mitigate any potential adverse impacts of new development on the setting of heritage items and the Heritage Conservation Areas.

 

Part 8: Development near Rail Corridors and Busy Roads

 

·    Guides development adjacent to major infrastructure corridors to ensure it is located and designed to protect the infrastructure and the users of the development from noise, vibration and other impacts related to development adjoining major road and rail infrastructure.

 

Volume C

 

Volume C contains general development controls which address planning issues that are applicable across a range of sites and across different types, forms and densities of development.  To ensure a consistent approach to issues, this part applies to all types of development.

The parts in this volume should be read in conjunction with the parts of Volume B relevant to the specific site, and the controls under the same heading in Volume A for the specific development type.

 

Part 1: Site Design

·    Guides site design and layout with particular attention to the relationship with the outcomes of the site analysis, and on landscaping, earthworks and slope.

Part 2: Access and Parking

·    Guides development in relation to the following: equitable access and pedestrian movement; vehicle access; parking; and bicycle facilities.

Part 3: Building Design and Sustainability

·    Provides general development controls for building design and sustainability for all building types.  Matters covered include: green buildings; building services; waste management; social impact; materials and colours; roof terraces and podiums; construction, demolition and waste disposal.

Part 4: Water Management

·    Is designed to ensure that the water management techniques employed for any given development are appropriate to both the site location and the development type, as identified in Volume B Part 2. It therefore applies different controls to different situations and must be followed from the start of the design process.

·    Supports Clause 6.2 of the KLEP (Local Centres) 2012. The controls cover stormwater management, design and water quality, water recycling and reuse (where reuse for water conservation is not covered by BASIX), subsurface water management and flood control and minimisation.  Water quality controls are now also included for dwelling houses.

·    Is intended as a complementary document to BASIX.

Part 5: Notification

·    Explains Council’s requirements and processes for the involvement of stakeholders in the consideration of development applications made under Part 4 of the EP&A Act 1979. The requirements and processes are tailored to the type of application and the potential impact of the proposal.

·    Outlines the requirements for submissions to Council.

 

ALIGNED PROJECTS

 

Draft Principal LEP

 

The draft Ku-ring-gai LEP 2012, the principal LEP for Ku-ring-gai, was endorsed for exhibition by Council at its meeting of 20 December 2012 for exhibition, and forwarding to the Department of Planning and Infrastructure for a revised gateway determination. Exhibition is expected early in 2013.

 

The Ku-ring-gai LEP 2012 will cover all areas of the LGA not covered by the Ku-ring-gai (Local Centres) LEP, ultimately, including Pymble Business Park.

 

The DCP to be prepared to support the principal LEP will be based on the Ku-ring-gai (Local Centres) DCP.

 

Development Contributions Plan

 

Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 is the current, consolidated contributions plan covering the whole of the Local Government Area of Ku-ring-gai.  It covers the whole of the current building phase in Ku-ring-gai through to 2031 and provides funding, complete or partial, towards the provision of physical and community infrastructure works required to support new development.

 

The finalisation of the planning process for the local centres, as well as the start of the release of data from the 2011 census, will be joint triggers for a revision of Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010. Key Census 2011 data will be released from 21 June 2012 through to March 2013.  A revision of the contributions plan will commence concurrently and be underway for much of 2012/2013.  It must be noted that the key infrastructure required to support development is already identified and the contributions of development towards this infrastructure is now in its eighth year.  The proposed revision will refine the works program based on current planning for the local centres and provide more information on the demography of Ku-ring-gai’s new residents.  This information will facilitate Council moving forward to the delivery phase of infrastructure planning.

 

The DCP directly references the Contributions Plan in Volume B Part 1 Special Areas and Sites. The DCP seeks to ensure that development affected by, or within the vicinity of, works identified in the Contributions Plan considers the future open space, community facilities and access works early in the design phase to provide vibrant, well connected and sustainable public areas and facilities.

 

Public Domain Manual

 

Ku-ring-gai adopted the public domain manual on 23 November 2010. This document guides the urban design of the local centres including paving, lighting, street furniture and the like as well as more detailed concept plans for specific sites such as key civic squares. 

 

The DCP again references the Public Domain Manual in Volume B Part 1 Special Areas and Sites.   It intended to be updated concurrent with the finalisation of the draft development control plan.

 

Governance Matters

 

The process for the preparation and implementation of Development Controls is governed by the provisions of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EP&A Act) and associated Regulations. While the purpose of a DCP is to provide more detailed provision with respect to development permitted by a LEP, the EP&A Act requires that a DCP cannot be inconsistent with any provisions of the LEP.

 

The State Government has recently passed a bill to amend the EP&A Act to increase the flexibility and reduce the weight of DCPs. It is likely to come into effect in the near future, and will affect all existing and new DCPs. Key changes include:

 

·    shifting the main purpose of a DCP to the facilitation of LEP aims, land use objectives and permissible development;

·    a clear statement that such provisions are not statutory;

·    a requirement for flexibility in applying the provisions and allowing reasonable alternative solutions that achieve the objectives of those provisions;

·    not requiring a DA to meet requirements more onerous than those in the DCP; and

·    considering the provisions only in relation to the specific DA (rather than precedents).

 

While it is likely the weight of DCP provisions will ultimately be determined by the Land and Environment Court, Section 79C of the EP&A Act will continue to require the consent authority to consider the provisions of a DCP in assessing a development application.  DCPs will continue to have a significant role in guiding development. 

 

The Ku-ring-gai Local Centres LEP 2012 was gazetted on 25 January 2013. The LEP contains zoning, land uses and higher order standards such as height and floor space standards. The proposed draft DCP establishes a more detailed framework to facilitate the achievement of the aims and objectives for the local centres under the KLEP 2012.

 

Risk Management

 

Not proceeding with the DCP for the local centres and therefore relying only on the higher order standards of the LEP may have unintended outcomes for development within these precincts. Council risks damage to its reputation if it does not have up-to-date and consistent development controls in place in an effective and timely manner.

 

The draft DCP contains detailed controls to guide development in managing risks such as bushfire, flooding and land contamination.

 

Financial Considerations

 

The cost of preparing and exhibition of the draft DCP as outlined in this report is covered by Council’s Strategy and Environment Department – Urban Planning budget.

 

 

 

Social Considerations

 

The draft DCP provides a raft of provisions in relation to social considerations. These include, but are not limited to, heritage protection, social impact assessment, improvements to the public domain, residential amenity, access for people of different ages and mobility, pedestrian amenity and safety.

 

Environmental Considerations

 

The draft DCP provides extensive guidance on the protection and management of our creeks and waterways, of native vegetation and habitat. It also includes provisions to minimise waste, to manage water sustainably and reduce energy use, where this is not covered by BASIX. The objectives and controls provide more detailed guidance on environmental matters of consideration identified in the Ku-ring-gai (Local Centres) LEP 2012.

 

Community Consultation

 

It is proposed that the consultation program for draft DCP exhibition period will consist of the following:

 

·    an advertisement in the local press giving notice of the exhibition and availability of exhibition materials;

·    an exhibition period of 28 days in accordance with the Environmental Planning & Assessment Regulation 2000;

·    notice on Council’s website and at Council libraries;

·    placement of the draft DCP exhibition materials on Council’s website and at Council Chambers;

·    notification to members of the public on the Local Centres email list and via facebook and twitter;

·    notification to key resident and community groups regarding the exhibition; and

·    copies of the exhibition material on CD Rom available free of charge to assist the community in making a submission.

Hard copies of the draft DCP for distribution to the general public will not be provided as the cost is prohibitive.

 

Internal Consultation

 

An integrated planning approach has been undertaken in preparing the draft DCP with comprehensive input from Council’s Development and Regulation Department and Community and Operations Departments where appropriate.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Summary

 

The Ku-ring-gai (Local Centres) LEP 2012 was gazetted on 25 January 2013. Detailed guidelines are now required to facilitate the achievement of the objectives within the LEP. This draft DCP establishes a framework for future development in the local centres under the new LEP.

 

The DCP uses a place based planning approach to provide general objectives and controls for all types of development within the centres and to address various constraints and risks.  It includes specific controls for ‘special areas and sites’ within the centres aimed at achieving a high quality built environment, landscape setting and vibrant community spaces.

 

If endorsed, the Draft DCP will be placed on statutory exhibition to seek public feedback, prior to it being reconsidered by Council for final adoption. 

 

Recommendation:

 

A.       That Council endorse draft Ku-ring-gai Development Control Plan (Local Centres) as included in Attachment 1 for the purpose of public exhibition.

 

B.       That draft Ku-ring-gai Development Control Plan (Local Centres) be placed on public exhibition as outlined in the report. 

 

C.       That a report be brought back to Council outlining recommendations resulting from the exhibition.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Terri Southwell

Senior Urban Planner

 

 

 

 

Craige Wyse

Team Leader Urban Planning

 

 

 

 

Antony Fabbro

Manager Urban & Heritage Planning

 

 

 

 

Andrew Watson

Director Strategy & Environment

 

 

Attachments:

A1View

Ku-ring-gai draft DCP (Local Centres) - circulated separately

 

 

  


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 5 February 2013

NM.1 / 304

 

 

Item NM.1

S02546

 

29 January 2013

 

 

Notice of Motion

 

 

Emergency Bushfire Flyer

 

Notice of Motion from Councillor Chantelle Fornari-Orsmond dated 29 January 2013

 

During the election campaign, I received numerous concerns from residents about the evacuation processes in the event of a major bushfire particularly in the North Turramurra area. This concern was also raised by NTAG when a public meeting was recently held to discuss what happens in the event of a major bushfire.

 

While Council staff and the Police that were present on the day explained the procedures of evacuation, there was only a relatively small resident’s representation present to gain an understanding of the process.

 

I have had further discussions with the Police Local Commander of the Ku-ring-gai Hornsby District and also the Local Fire Controller for the RFS. They are supportive of Council undertaking the distribution of a flyer to all residents in a bush fire prone area to advise them of what happens in the event of an emergency and when evacuation is involved.

 

It is not intended that this flyer cover material already in distribution but it is intended to be mainly directed at the evacuation process.

 

The process will involve discussions and approval of the District Emergency Management Committee and also the Bushfire Management Committee.

 

The preliminary estimates for the cost of preparing the flyer and distribution to over 15,000 residents is estimated to be less than $10,000 and it is recommended that this be considered as a project to be included in the 2013/14 budget.

 

I move that:

 

"1.     Council support the preparation of an information flyer to all houses in bushfire prone areas.

 

2.       The flyer be approved by the District Emergency Management Committee and the Bushfire Management Committee prior to printing.

 

3.       Funding of up to $10,000 be made available in the project budget for 2013/14 for possible distribution of the flyer in August/September 2013.

 

4.       Council approach the Local Community Bank to seek possible sponsorship for this project."

 

 

 

 

Recommendation:

 

That the above Notice of Motion as printed be adopted.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Councillor Chantelle Fornari-Orsmond

Councillor for Wahroonga Ward

 

 

 

  


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 5 February 2013

NM.2 / 306

 

 

Item NM.2

S04461

 

29 January 2013

 

 

Notice of Motion

 

 

Replacing and Upgrading Council's Public Toilets

 

 

Notice of Motion from Councillor Chantelle Fornari-Orsmond dated 29 January 2013

 

For quite some time I have been concerned about the standard of Council’s public toilets.  Since being elected as a Councillor I have been approached by a number of residents about the condition of Council’s public toilets in terms of appearance and cleanliness.

 

While I understand that Council has a program to gradually upgrade a number of the public toilets, I am concerned that any refurbishment work may not result in a suitable outcome in quite a number of cases.  It may be more appropriate to demolish and replace those toilets with new facilities that can incorporate self cleansing and automatic locking facilities.

 

Council is using the Local Government Renewal Scheme loan subsidy program to accelerate the upgrade to a number of facilities and it may be better to replace 2 facilities per year over the next

4 years under this program.

 

It is not intended that the new facilities funding under the Section 94 program be included in this program.

 

Therefore, I am requesting that a report be brought back for Council’s consideration as soon as possible including a review of the current public toilets upgrade program and a revised upgrade program incorporating the following objectives:

 

·        Replacing 2 toilet facilities per year with new facilities commencing in 2013/14 for 4 years

·        Upgrade 2 toilet facilities per year to include floor and wall tiling, new toilets, improve lighting and new hand basins

·        Provide Council with a maintenance schedule on the cleaning requirements that includes cleaning of the light fittings and removal of cobwebs

·        Inclusion of a sign that provides a contact number for reporting poor standards of cleaning and appearance.

 

The recent upgrade of the toilet at Wahroonga car park has incorporated a number of the above initiatives and it would be valuable for this practice to continue.

 

I move that:

 

"A report be brought back to Council reviewing the public toilet replacement and maintenance program with the aim of achieving the above objectives."

 

 

 

 

Recommendation:

 

That the above Notice of Motion as printed be adopted.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Councillor Chantelle Fornari-Orsmond

Councillor for Wahroonga Ward