Ordinary Meeting of Council
TO BE HELD ON Tuesday, 28 July 2015 AT 7.00pm
Level 3 Council Chamber
Agenda
** ** ** ** ** **
NOTE: For Full Details, See Council’s Website –
www.kmc.nsw.gov.au under the link to business papers
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
Confirmation of Reports to be Considered in Closed Meeting
NOTE:
That in accordance with the provisions of Section 10 of the Local Government Act 1993, all officers’ reports be released to the press and public, with the exception of confidential attachments to the following General Business reports:
Refer GB.2 Tender T04/2014 - Offsite Records Storage and Retrieval Services
Attachment A1: Tender T04/2014 - Offsite Records Storage and Retrieval Services - Tender Evaluation Committee Report
Attachment A2: Tender T04/2014 - Offsite Records Storage and Retrieval Services - Evaluation Worksheet - All Submissions
Attachment A3: Tender T04/2014 - Offsite Records Storage and Retrieval Services - Short-listed Firms
Refer GB.6 Tender T8-2015 - Howson oval Sportsfield Upgrade (Design and Construct)
Attachment A1: List of Tenders received, financial considerations and Tender Evaluation Panel's comments
Attachment A2: Tender Evaluation Panel's Score and recommendation
Attachment A3: Corporate Scorecard Report - Tenderer 'A' - Financial and Performance Assessment
Refer GB.7 259-271 Pacific Highway, Lindfield (Lindfield Library Site) - project update
Attachment A2: JLL Lindfield Library Feasibility Study 15-07-15 FINAL
Address the Council
NOTE: Persons who address the Council should be aware that their address will be tape recorded.
Documents Circulated to Councillors
CONFIRMATION OF MINUTEs
Minutes of Ordinary Meeting of Council 6
File: S02131
Meeting held 14 July 2015
Minutes numbered 182 to 201
minutes from the Mayor
Petitions
GENERAL BUSINESS
i. The Mayor to invite Councillors to nominate any item(s) on the Agenda that they wish to have a site inspection.
ii. The Mayor to invite Councillors to nominate any item(s) on the Agenda that they wish to adopt in accordance with the officer’s recommendation allowing for minor changes without debate.
GB.1 The Hornsby Ku-ring-gai Women's Shelter Annual Gala Dinner 81
File: S08654
To advise Council of an invitation from the Hornsby Ku-ring-gai Women’s Shelter Inc. to purchase tickets for their Annual Gala Dinner on Saturday 15 August 2015.
Recommendation:
That Council purchase a table of 10 tickets for the Hornsby Ku-ring-gai Women’s Shelter Annual Gala Dinner for $650.00, and that Councillors who are interested in attending the dinner advise the General Manager by Friday 31 July 2015.
GB.2 Tender T04/2014 - Offsite Records Storage and Retrieval Services 86
File: S10123
To consider the tenders received for the offsite storage and retrieval services for Council’s records.
Recommendation:
That Council, in accordance with clause 178(3)(a) of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005, declines to accept any of the tenders and cancels the proposal for the contract for offsite records storage and retrieval services.
GB.3 Investment Report as at 30 June 2015 92
File: S05273
To present Council’s investment portfolio performance for June 2015.
Recommendation:
That the summary of investments performance for June 2015 be received and noted; and that the Certificate of the Responsible Accounting Officer be noted and report adopted.
GB.4 Local Government NSW Annual Conference 2015 101
File: S02046/8
To advise Councillors that the Local Government NSW Annual Conference will be held from 11 – 13 October 2015 at Rosehill Gardens Racecourse (James Ruse Drive Rosehill)
Recommendation:
The Councillors advise the General Manager by Friday, 31 July 2015, identifying any issues including appropriate solutions that they would like to see raised for discussion at the 2015 Conference and that a further report be brought back to the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Tuesday, 11 August 2015 for Council’s consideration, prior to the referral to Local Government NSW by the deadline.
GB.5 Setting the Date for the Election of Mayor and Deputy Mayor - 2015/2016 107
File: S03662
To give consideration to setting the date for the 2015/2016 election of the Mayor and Deputy Mayor.
Recommendation:
That the 2015/2016 election of the Mayor and Deputy Mayor be held at the Ordinary meeting of Council on Tuesday, 15 September 2015
GB.6 Tender T8-2015 - Howson oval Sportsfield Upgrade (Design and Construct) 111
File: S10355
To consider the tenders received for the Howson Oval Sportsfield Upgrade (Design and Construct), Howson Avenue, South Turramurra and appoint the preferred tenderer.
Recommendation:
In accordance with Section 55 of the Local Government Act and Tender Regulations, and following the request for tender, it is recommended that Council accepts the tender submitted by tender ‘A’.
GB.7 259-271 Pacific Highway, Lindfield (Lindfield Library Site) - project update 117
File: S10468
To update Council on the progress of planning for the site and the land reclassification process and present a recommendation for a preferred option for the potential redevelopment of the existing Lindfield library precinct at 259-271 Pacific Highway, Lindfield.
Recommendation:
That Council adopts built form Option 2 and proceed to prepare an illustrated concept design of Option 2 for public exhibition.
Extra Reports Circulated to Meeting
Motions of which due Notice has been given
NM.1 Site Inspection, Canoon Road Netball Complex 244
File: S09042
Notice of Motion from Councillor Malicki dated 16 July 2015
I move that a site inspection be conducted for all available Councillors with a staff member to the Canoon Road Netball Complex on Saturday 1st August.
This inspection is to be in the Council bus or a staff vehicle depending on the number of Councillors expected to attend, and a recording be made for those Councillors who are unable to attend on the day.
NM.2 33 Grandview Street, Pymble - Part E of Minute 196 from the Ordinary Meeting of Council 14 July 2015 245
File: S10098
Notice of Rescission from Councillors Berlioz, Citer and Malicki dated 17 July 2015
We move Rescission of 33 Grandview Street from Part E of Minute 196 from the Ordinary Meeting of Council 14 July 2015 namely:
E. That Council defers any decision in regards to 6 Caithness Street and 33 Grandview Street for a Council briefing from a Heritage expert.
BUSINESS WITHOUT NOTICE – SUBJECT TO CLAUSE 241 OF GENERAL REGULATIONS
Questions Without Notice
Inspections Committee – SETTING OF TIME, DATE AND RENDEZVOUS
** ** ** ** ** **
MINUTES OF Ordinary Meeting of Council
HELD ON Tuesday, 14 July 2015
Present: |
Councillor C Fornari-Orsmond (Acting Chairperson) (Wahroonga Ward) Councillors E Malicki & J Pettett (Comenarra Ward) Councillor D Citer (Gordon Ward) Councillor C Berlioz (St Ives Ward) Councillor D Armstrong (Roseville Ward) Councillor D McDonald (Wahroonga Ward) |
|
|
Staff Present: |
General Manager (John McKee) Director Corporate (David Marshall) Director Development & Regulation (Michael Miocic) Director Operations (Greg Piconi) Director Strategy & Environment (Andrew Watson) Director Community (Janice Bevan) Manager Records & Governance (Matt Ryan) Corporate Lawyer (Jamie Taylor) Minutes Secretary (Judy Murphy) Governance Officer (Christine Dunand) |
The Meeting commenced at 7.00pm
The Acting Chairperson offered the Prayer
182 |
File: S02194
The Mayor, Councillor Jennifer Anderson tendered an apology for non-attendance (family reasons) and requested leave of absence.
Councillor David Ossip tendered an apology for non-attendance (overseas) and requested leave of absence.
That leave of absence for Councillor Cheryl Szatow be noted as leave has previously been granted.
|
|
(Moved: Councillor McDonald/Councillor Armstrong)
That the apologies be accepted and leave of absence granted.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
|
The Acting Chairperson adverted to the necessity for Councillors and staff to declare a Pecuniary Interest/Conflict of Interest in any item on the Business Paper.
The General Manager and staff declared an interest in Item C.1 The General Manager's Performance Review, as is standard practice we will all be leaving the chamber for Council to consider the matter.
DOCUMENTS CIRCULATED TO COUNCILLORS
The Acting Chairperson adverted to the documents circulated in the Councillors’ papers and advised that the following matters would be dealt with at the appropriate time during the meeting:
Memorandums: |
Consideration of Submissions on the Planning Proposal to Heritage List 5 Properties in Turramurra, Wahroonga, Pymble and Killara - Memorandum from Acting Manager Urban Planning dated 7 July 2015 which alludes to hard copies of submissions to item GB.4 Consideration of Submissions on the Planning Proposal to Heritage List 5 Properties in Turramurra, Wahroonga, Pymble and Killara. |
Councillors Information: |
Charles Bean Oval – Lack of Parking - Memorandum from Director Operations dated 2 July 2015 in answer to a Question Without Notice raised by Councillor Elaine Malicki at the Ordinary Meeting of Council held 26 May 2015. |
185 |
File: S02767 Vide: MM.1
|
|
I am pleased to inform you that 7 Ku-ring-gai citizens, through their outstanding achievements and services to the community, have been awarded 2015 Queen’s Birthday Honours.
We are very proud to have these dedicated and talented Australians as members of the Ku-ring-gai community.
I would like to read to you the names of these special Ku-ring-gai citizens and, on behalf of Council, congratulate them on their excellent contributions to Australian society.
Samuel Stuart CLARK AM of Killara, for significant services to the law, through senior roles with professional legal bodies, to strategic reform, and to the rural fire service.
Geoffrey James FOGARTY PSM of St Ives, for outstanding public service to roads and maritime services in New South Wales.
Charles William FREW OAM of Pymble, for service to community health organisations through fundraising roles.
Richard Reynolds MILES OAM of Wahroonga, for service to the community, particularly through roles with education organisations.
Thomas Gordon REID OAM of North Turramurra, for service to the community, and to people with disability.
His Honour Judge Stephen Hugh SCARLETT RFD OAM, resident of Ku-ring-gai, for service to the judiciary, to the law, and to professional organisations.
Stephen James SIMPSON AC of Wahroonga, for eminent service to biological and biomedical science as an educator, researcher and author, particularly in the areas of human nutrition, obesity and metabolic disease, to higher education, and through roles with a range of professional scientific organisations.
On behalf of Council, I congratulate all these award winners on their outstanding achievements.
Ku-ring-gai should be proud that it has so many citizens being recognised at the highest levels for their selfless dedication, commitment and contribution to local, national and international communities.
|
|
(Moved: Councillors Fornari-Orsmond/McDonald)
A. That Council acknowledge the outstanding contribution made by these recipients of 2015 Queen’s Birthday Honours to the Ku-ring-gai community and to the well-being of our society.
B. That the Mayor, on behalf of Council, write to the recipients to congratulate them.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY |
PETITIONS
Recommendations from Committee
Minutes of Ku-ring-gai Traffic Committee
File: CY00022/7
Vide: RC.1
Meeting held 18 June 2015
Minutes numbered KTC.6 to KTC.10.
190 |
File: TM6/07
Ward: Roseville Electorate: Davidson Vide Minute No KTC09
|
|
To consider a request by Aqualand Projects Pty Ltd for the temporary closure of Kochia Lane, Lindfield between Lindfield Avenue and Chapman Lane during construction of a multi-storey mixed use development at 23-37 Lindfield Avenue.
|
|
(Moved: Councillors Berlioz/Pettett)
That Council approve the temporary closure of Kochia Lane, Lindfield, between Lindfield Avenue and Chapman Lane for approximately 27 weeks from July 2015, subject to:
A. The Roads and Maritime Services approving the Traffic Management Plan submitted by Aqualand Project Pty Ltd.
B. No substantial objection being received from adjacent business operators and residents.
C. Aqualand Project Pty Ltd implementing the Traffic Management Plan approved by the Roads and Maritime Services in accordance with Australian Standards. Appropriate detour arrangements as detailed in the Traffic Management Plan be implemented during the entire closure period.
D. That the closure being advertised by Council as required by Section 116 of the Roads Act 1993 and no substantial objection to the proposal which cannot be addressed, being received by the closing date of the advertising.
E. That Aqualand Project Pty Ltd provide and maintain all necessary signs, barricades and all other safety equipment at its expense to properly effect the changed traffic conditions.
F. That Aqualand Projects Ltd submitting a copy of the 20 million dollar Public Liability insurance cover, naming Ku-ring-gai Council as an interested party.
G. That Aqualand Projects Pty Ltd respond in writing to Council, regarding the acceptance of Council’s conditions for the temporary closure of Kochia Lane Lindfield between Lindfield Avenue and Chapman Lane.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
|
193 |
Licence to Rotary Clubs of Turramurra and Ku-ring-gai to Conduct Markets in Wade Lane Car Park at Gordon
File: S02618/2 Vide: GB.5
|
|
To seek approval to review the terms of Council’s resolution of 28 October 2014 in respect of the proposed licence fee for the Rotary Clubs of Turramurra and Ku-ring-gai’s use of the mid-level of the Wade Lane Car Park.
|
|
(Moved: Councillors Citer/McDonald)
A. That Council grant the renewal of a 5 year licence to the Turramurra Rotary Club Incorporated and the Ku-ring-gai Rotary Club Incorporated.
B. That Council endorse the licence fee being established in accordance with Council’s Policy for the Management of Community and Recreational Land and Facilities and that an 80% rebate be applied to the market rate assessed by independent valuation as set out in the report.
C. That Council notes that public advertising of the intent to grant the licence as prescribed by Sections 47 and 47A of the Local Government Act 1993 has been carried out and no public submissions were received.
D. That Council confirms the Mayor and General Manager are authorised to execute all documentation associated with the licence agreement.
E. That Council authorise the Common Seal of Council to be affixed to licence documentation.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY |
194 |
General Manager's Performance Review
File: CY00254/7 Vide: C.1
|
|
In accordance with the Local Government Act 1993 and the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005, in the opinion of the General Manager, the following business is of a kind as referred to in section 10A(2)(a), of the Act, and should be dealt with in a part of the meeting closed to the public.
Section 10A(2)(a) of the Act permits the meeting to be closed to the public for business relating to personnel matters concerning particular individuals (other than Councillors).
Confidential Mayoral Minute by the Mayor, Councillor Jennifer Anderson dated 25 June 2015.
|
|
(Moved Councillors Citer/McDonald)
A. That Council recognises that overall the General Manager’s performance achieved a MORE THAN SATISFACTORY result for the 2014/2015 performance cycle.
B. That Council grant a discretionary increase in total remuneration package of 4%.
C. That the General Manager be formally advised of Council’s decision.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY |
Standing Orders were suspended to deal with items where there are speakers first after a Motion moved by Councillors McDonald/Berlioz was CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
195 |
107 Junction Road, Wahroonga - Demolish Existing Structures and Construct 8 Self-Contained Dwellings over Basement Parking - SEPP (Housing for Seniors or People with a Disability) 2004
File: DA0294/14 Vide: GB.2
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following members of the public addressed Council:
G Cusack C Blyth
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
To determine Development Application No. 0294/14 for the demolition of existing structures and construction of eight self-contained dwellings pursuant to SEPP (Housing for Seniors or People with a Disability) 2004.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Moved: Councillors McDonald/Berlioz)
That Council, as the consent authority, grant development consent to DA0294/14 for the demolition of existing structures and construction of eight self-contained dwellings pursuant to SEPP (Housing for Seniors or People with a Disability) 2004 on land at 107 Junction Road, Wahroonga for a period of two (2) years from the date of the Notice of Determination, subject to the following conditions:
Conditions that identify approved plans:
1. Approved architectural plans and documentation (new development)
The development must be carried out in accordance with the following plans and documentation listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, except where amended by other conditions of this consent:
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
2. Inconsistency between documents
In the event of any inconsistency between conditions of this consent and the drawings/documents referred to above, the conditions of this consent prevail.
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
3. Approved landscape plans
Landscape works shall be carried out in accordance with the following landscape plan(s), listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, except where amended by other conditions of this consent:
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
Conditions to be satisfied prior to demolition, excavation or construction:
4. Asbestos works
All work involving asbestos products and materials, including asbestos-cement-sheeting (ie. Fibro), must be carried out in accordance with the guidelines for asbestos work published by WorkCover Authority of NSW.
Reason: To ensure public safety.
5. Notice of commencement
At least 48 hours prior to the commencement of any development (including demolition, excavation, shoring or underpinning works), a notice of commencement of building or subdivision work form and appointment of the principal certifying authority form shall be submitted to Council.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
6. Notification of builder’s details
Prior to the commencement of any development or excavation works, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be notified in writing of the name and contractor licence number of the owner/builder intending to carry out the approved works.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
7. Dilapidation survey and report (public infrastructure)
Prior to the commencement of any development or excavation works on site, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a dilapidation report on the visible and structural condition of all structures of the following public infrastructure, has been completed and submitted to Council:
Public infrastructure
· Full road pavement width, including kerb and gutter, of Junction Road over the site frontage. · All driveway crossings and laybacks opposite the subject site.
The report must be completed by a consulting structural/civil engineer. Particular attention must be paid to accurately recording (both written and photographic) existing damaged areas on the aforementioned infrastructure so that Council is fully informed when assessing any damage to public infrastructure caused as a result of the development.
The developer may be held liable to any recent damage to public infrastructure in the vicinity of the site, where such damage is not accurately recorded by the requirements of this condition prior to the commencement of works.
Note: A written acknowledgment from Council must be obtained (attesting to this condition being appropriately satisfied) and submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the commencement of any excavation works.
Reason: To record the structural condition of public infrastructure before works commence.
8. Dilapidation survey and report (private property)
Prior to the commencement of any demolition or excavation works on site, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a dilapidation report on the visible and structural condition of all structures upon the following lands, has been completed and submitted to Council:
The dilapidation report must include a photographic survey of adjoining properties detailing their physical condition, both internally and externally, including such items as walls ceilings, roof and structural members. The report must be completed by a consulting structural/geotechnical engineer as determined necessary by that professional based on the excavations for the proposal and the recommendations of the submitted geotechnical report.
In the event that access for undertaking the dilapidation survey is denied by a property owner, the applicant must demonstrate in writing to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority that all reasonable steps have been taken to obtain access and advise the affected property owner of the reason for the survey and that these steps have failed.
Note: A copy of the dilapidation report is to be provided to Council prior to any excavation works been undertaken. The dilapidation report is for record keeping purposes only and may be used by an applicant or affected property owner to assist in any civil action required to resolve any dispute over damage to adjoining properties arising from works.
Reason: To record the structural condition of likely affected properties before works commence.
9. Construction and traffic management plan
The applicant must submit to Council a Construction Traffic Management Plan (TMP), which is to be approved prior to the commencement of any works on site.
The plan is to consist of a report with Traffic Control Plans attached.
The report is to contain commitments which must be followed by the demolition and excavation contractor, builder, owner and subcontractors. The TMP applies to all persons associated with demolition, excavation and construction of the development.
The report is to contain construction vehicle routes for approach and departure to and from all directions.
The report is to contain a site plan showing entry and exit points. Swept paths are to be shown on the site plan showing access and egress for an 11 metre long heavy rigid vehicle.
The Traffic Control Plans are to be prepared by a qualified person (red card holder). One must be provided for each of the following stages of the works:
· Demolition · Excavation · Concrete pour · Construction of vehicular crossing and reinstatement of footpath · Traffic control for vehicles reversing into or out of the site.
Traffic controllers must be in place at the site entry and exit points to control heavy vehicle movements in order to maintain the safety of pedestrians and other road users.
When a satisfactory TMP is received, a letter of approval will be issued with conditions attached. Traffic management at the site must comply with the approved TMP as well as any conditions in the letter issued by Council. Council’s Rangers will be patrolling the site regularly and fines will be issued for any non-compliance with this condition.
Reason: To ensure that appropriate measures have been considered during all phases of the construction process in a manner that maintains the environmental amenity and ensures the ongoing safety and protection of people.
10. Temporary construction exit
A temporary construction exit, together with necessary associated temporary fencing, shall be provided prior to commencement of any work on the site and shall be maintained throughout the duration and progress of construction.
Reason: To reduce or eliminate the transport of sediment from the construction site onto public roads.
11. Sediment controls
Prior to any work commencing on site, sediment and erosion control measures shall be installed along the contour immediately downslope of any future disturbed areas.
The form of the sediment controls to be installed on the site shall be determined by reference to the ‘NSW Department of Housing manual ‘Managing Urban Stormwater: Soils and Construction’. The erosion controls shall be maintained in an operational condition until the development activities have been completed and the site fully stabilised. Sediment shall be removed from the sediment controls following each heavy or prolonged rainfall period.
Reason: To preserve and enhance the natural environment.
12. Erosion and drainage management
Earthworks and/or demolition of any existing buildings shall not commence until an erosion and sediment control plan is submitted to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority. The plan shall comply with the guidelines set out in the NSW Department of Housing manual "Managing Urban Stormwater: Soils and Construction" certificate. Erosion and sediment control works shall be implemented in accordance with the erosion and sediment control plan.
Reason: To preserve and enhance the natural environment.
13. Tree protection fencing
To preserve the following tree/s, no work shall commence until the area beneath their canopy is fenced off at the specified radius from the trunk/s to prevent any activities, storage or the disposal of materials within the fenced area. The fence/s shall be maintained intact until the completion of all demolition/building work on site.
Reason: To protect existing trees during the construction phase.
14. Tree protective fencing type galvanised mesh
The tree protection fencing shall be constructed of galvanised pipe at 2.4 metres spacing and connected by securely attached chain mesh fencing to a minimum height of 1.8 metres in height prior to work commencing.
Reason: To protect existing trees during construction phase.
15. Tree protection signage
Prior to works commencing, tree protection signage is to be attached to each tree protection zone, displayed in a prominent position and the sign repeated at 10 metres intervals or closer where the fence changes direction. Each sign shall contain in a clearly legible form, the following information:
Tree protection zone.
· This fence has been installed to prevent damage to the trees and their growing environment both above and below ground and access is restricted. · Any encroachment not previously approved within the tree protection zone shall be the subject of an arborist's report. · The arborist's report shall provide proof that no other alternative is available. · The Arborist's report shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority for further consultation with Council. · The name, address, and telephone number of the developer.
Reason: To protect existing trees during the construction phase.
16. Tree protection mulching
Prior to works commencing and throughout construction, the area of the tree protection zone is to be mulched to a depth of 100mm with composted organic material being 75% Eucalyptus leaf litter and 25% wood.
Reason: To protect existing trees during the construction phase.
17. Tree protection - avoiding soil compaction
To preserve the following tree/s and avoid soil compaction, no work shall commence until temporary measures to avoid soil compaction (eg rumble boards) beneath the canopy of the following tree/s is/are installed between the required tree protection fencing and the development works:
Reason: To protect existing trees during the construction phase.
18. Tree fencing inspection
Upon installation of the required tree protection measures, an inspection of the site by the Principal Certifying Authority is required to verify that tree protection measures comply with all relevant conditions.
Reason: To protect existing trees during the construction phase.
Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of the construction certificate:
19. Long service levy
In accordance with Section 109F(i) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act a Construction Certificate shall not be issued until any long service levy payable under Section 34 of the Building and Construction Industry Long Service Payments Act 1986 (or where such levy is payable by instalments, the first instalment of the levy) has been paid. Council is authorised to accept payment. Where payment has been made elsewhere, proof of payment is to be provided to Council.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
20. Builder’s indemnity insurance
The applicant, builder, developer or person who does the work on this development, must arrange builder’s indemnity insurance and submit the certificate of insurance in accordance with the requirements of Part 6 of the Home Building Act 1989 to the Certifying Authority for endorsement of the plans accompanying the Construction Certificate.
It is the responsibility of the applicant, builder or developer to arrange the builder's indemnity insurance for residential building work over the value of $20,000. The builder's indemnity insurance does not apply to commercial or industrial building work or to residential work valued at less than $20,000, nor to work undertaken by persons holding an owner/builder's permit issued by the Department of Fair Trading (unless the owner/builder's property is sold within 7 years of the commencement of the work).
Reason: Statutory requirement.
21. Outdoor lighting
Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that all outdoor lighting will comply with AS/NZ1158.3: 1999 Pedestrian Area (Category P) Lighting and AS4282: 1997 Control of the Obtrusive Effects of Outdoor Lighting.
Note: Details demonstrating compliance with these requirements are to be submitted prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate.
Reason: To provide high quality external lighting for security without adverse affects on public amenity from excessive illumination levels.
22. Air drying facilities
Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a common open space area dedicated for open air drying of clothes is provided. This area is to be located at ground level behind the building line and in a position not visible from the public domain.
In lieu of the above, written confirmation that all units will be provided with internal clothes drying facilities prior to the Occupation Certificate is to be submitted to the Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate.
Reason: Amenity & energy efficiency.
23. External service pipes and the like prohibited
Proposed water pipes, waste pipes, stack work, duct work, mechanical ventilation plant and the like must be located within the building. Details confirming compliance with this condition must be shown on construction certificate plans and detailed with construction certificate specifications. Required external vents or vent pipes on the roof or above the eaves must be shown on construction certificate plans and detailed with construction certificate specifications. External vents or roof vent pipes must not be visible from any place unless detailed upon development consent plans. Where there is any proposal to fit external service pipes or the like this must be detailed in an amended development (S96) application and submitted to Council for determination.
Vent pipes required by Sydney Water must not be placed on the front elevation of the building or front roof elevation. The applicant, owner and builder must protect the appearance of the building from the public place and the appearance of the streetscape by elimination of all external services excluding vent pipes required by Sydney Water and those detailed upon development consent plans.
Reason: To protect the streetscape and the integrity of the approved development.
24. Access for people with disabilities (residential)
Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that access for people with disabilities to and from and between the public domain, residential units and all common open space areas is provided. Consideration must be given to the means of dignified and equitable access.
Compliant access provisions for people with disabilities shall be clearly shown on the plans submitted with the Construction Certificate. All details shall be provided to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate. All details shall be prepared in consideration of the Disability Discrimination Act, and the relevant provisions of AS1428.1, AS1428.2, AS1428.4 and AS 1735.12.
Reason: To ensure the provision of equitable and dignified access for all people in accordance with disability discrimination legislation and relevant Australian Standards.
25. Excavation for services
Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that no proposed underground services (ie: water, sewerage, drainage, gas or other service) unless previously approved by conditions of consent, are located beneath the canopy of any tree protected under Council’s Tree Preservation Order, located on the subject allotment and adjoining allotments.
Note: A plan detailing the routes of these services and trees protected under the Tree Preservation Order shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority.
Reason: To ensure the protection of trees.
26. Pier and beam footings near trees
Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the footings of the approved front fence/masonry wall will be isolated pier or pier and beam construction within the specified radius of the trunk/s of the following tree:
The piers shall be located such that no roots of a diameter greater than 30mm will be severed or injured during the construction period. The beam/s shall be of reinforced concrete or galvanised steel sections and placed in positions with the base of the beam being a minimum of 50mm above existing soil levels.
Note: Structural details of the pier or pier and beam construction shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority.
Reason: To protect existing trees.
27. Recycling and waste management
Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the development provides a common garbage collection/separation area sufficient in size to store all wheelie garbage bins and recycling bins provided by Council for the number of units in the development in accordance with DCP 40. The garbage collection point is to be accessible by Council’s Waste Collection Services.
The responsibility for:
· the cleaning of waste rooms and waste service compartments; and · the transfer of bins within the property, and to the collection point once the development is in use;
shall be determined when designing the system and clearly stated in the Waste Management Plan.
Note: The architectural plans are to be amended and provided to the Certifying Authority.
Reason: Environmental protection.
28. Noise from plant in residential zone
Where any form of mechanical ventilation equipment or other noise generating plant is proposed as part of the development, prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate the Certifying Authority, shall be satisfied that the operation of an individual piece of equipment or operation of equipment in combination will not exceed more than 5dB(A) above the background level during the day when measured at the site’s boundaries and shall not exceed the background level at night (10.00pm -6.00 am) when measured at the boundary of the site.
C1. Note: A certificate from an appropriately qualified acoustic engineer is to be submitted with the Construction Certificate, certifying that all mechanical ventilation equipment or other noise generating plant in isolation or in combination with other plant will comply with the above requirements.
Reason: To comply with best practice standards for residential acoustic amenity.
29. Location of plant
Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that all plant and equipment (including but not limited to air conditioning equipment) is located within the basement.
C1. Note: Architectural plans identifying the location of all plant and equipment shall be provided to the Certifying Authority.
Reason: To minimise impact on surrounding properties, improved visual appearance and amenity for locality.
30. Driveway crossing levels
Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, driveway and associated footpath levels for any new, reconstructed or extended sections of driveway crossings between the property boundary and road alignment must be obtained from Ku-ring-gai Council. Such levels are only able to be issued by Council under the Roads Act 1993. All footpath crossings, laybacks and driveways are to be constructed according to Council's specifications "Construction of Gutter Crossings and Footpath Crossings".
Specifications are issued with alignment levels after completing the necessary application form at Customer Services and payment of the assessment fee. When completing the request for driveway levels application from Council, the applicant must attach a copy of the relevant development application drawing which indicates the position and proposed level of the proposed driveway at the boundary alignment.
This development consent is for works wholly within the property. Development consent does not imply approval of footpath or driveway levels, materials or location within the road reserve, regardless of whether this information is shown on the development application plans. The grading of such footpaths or driveways outside the property shall comply with Council's standard requirements. The suitability of the grade of such paths or driveways inside the property is the sole responsibility of the applicant and the required alignment levels fixed by Council may impact upon these levels.
The construction of footpaths and driveways outside the property in materials other than those approved by Council is not permitted.
Reason: To provide suitable vehicular access without disruption to pedestrian and vehicular traffic.
31. Driveway grades - basement carparks
Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, longitudinal driveway sections are to be prepared by a qualified civil/traffic engineer and be submitted for to and approved by the Certifying Authority. These profiles are to be at 1:100 scale along both edges of the proposed driveway, starting from the centreline of the frontage street carriageway to the proposed basement floor level. The traffic engineer shall provide specific written certification on the plans that:
· vehicular access can be obtained using grades of 20% (1 in 5) maximum and · all changes in grade (transitions) comply with Australian Standard 2890.1 -“Off-street car parking” (refer clause 2.5.3) to prevent the scraping of the underside of vehicles.
If a new driveway crossing is proposed, the longitudinal sections must incorporate the driveway crossing levels as issued by Council upon prior application.
Reason: To provide suitable vehicular access without disruption to pedestrian and vehicular traffic.
32. Basement car parking details
Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, certified parking layout plan(s) to scale showing all aspects of the vehicle access and accommodation arrangements must be submitted to and approved by the Certifying Authority. A qualified civil/traffic engineer must review the proposed vehicle access and accommodation layout and provide written certification on the plans that:
· all parking space dimensions, driveway and aisle widths, driveway grades, transitions, circulation ramps, blind aisle situations and other trafficked areas comply with Australian Standard 2890.1 – 2004 “Off-street car parking” · a clear height clearance of 2.6 metres (required under DCP40 for waste collection trucks) is provided over the designated garbage collection truck manoeuvring areas within the basement · no doors or gates are provided in the access driveways to the basement carpark which would prevent unrestricted access for internal garbage collection at any time from the basement garbage storage and collection area · the dimensions of all parking spaces, including lengths and widths, comply with the State Environmental Planning Policy for Senior Living relating to height clearances and space dimensions · the vehicle access and accommodation arrangements are to be constructed and marked in accordance with the certified plans
Reason: To ensure that parking spaces are in accordance with the approved development.
33. Drainage of paved areas
All new exposed impervious areas graded towards adjacent property and/or habitable areas are to be drained via the main drainage system. This may require the installation of suitable inlets pits, cut-off structures (e.g. kerb), and/or barriers that direct such runoff to the formal drainage system. Details of such measures shall be shown on the Construction Certificate drawings, to the satisfaction of the Certifying Authority.
Reason: To control surface run off and protect the environment.
34. Vehicular access and garaging
Driveways and vehicular access ramps must be designed not to scrape the underside of cars. In all respects, the proposed vehicle access and accommodation arrangements must be designed and constructed to comply with Australian Standard 2890.1 - 2004 “Off-Street car parking”. Details are to be provided to and approved by the Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate.
Reason: To ensure that parking spaces are in accordance with the approved development.
35. Utility provider requirements
Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, the applicant must make contact with all relevant utility providers whose services will be impacted upon by the development. A written copy of the requirements of each provider, as determined necessary by the Certifying Authority, must be obtained. All utility services or appropriate conduits for the same must be provided by the developer in accordance with the specifications of the utility providers.
Reason: To ensure compliance with the requirements of relevant utility providers.
36. Underground services
All electrical services (existing and proposed) shall be undergrounded from the proposed building on the site to the appropriate power pole(s) or other connection point. Undergrounding of services must not disturb the root system of existing trees and shall be undertaken in accordance with the requirements of the relevant service provided. Documentary evidence that the relevant service provider has been consulted and that their requirements have been met are to be provided to the Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate. All electrical and telephone services to the subject property must be placed underground and any redundant poles are to be removed at the expense of the applicant.
Reason: To provide infrastructure that facilitates the future improvement of the streetscape by relocation of overhead lines below ground.
37. Privacy
To mitigate privacy impacts on adjoining properties, the following measures shall be implemented:
· A fixed privacy screen shall be installed along the entire length of the western elevation of the balcony to Unit 7. The privacy screen shall have a height of 1.6 metres above the finished floor level. The privacy screen shall be constructed of a durable material, appropriately integrated and shall be designed so as to prevent direct overlooking of neighbouring properties.
· A fixed privacy screen shall be installed along the entire length of the eastern elevation of the balcony to Unit 8. The privacy screen shall have a height of 1.6 metres above the finished floor level. The privacy screen shall be constructed of a durable material, appropriately integrated and shall be designed so as to prevent direct overlooking of neighbouring properties.
Reason: To maintain neighbour amenity.
Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of the construction certificate or prior to demolition, excavation or construction (whichever comes first):
38. Infrastructure restorations fee
To ensure that damage to Council Property as a result of construction activity is rectified in a timely matter:
a) All work or activity taken in furtherance of the development the subject of this approval must be undertaken in a manner to avoid damage to Council Property and must not jeopardise the safety of any person using or occupying the adjacent public areas.
b) The applicant, builder, developer or any person acting in reliance on this approval shall be responsible for making good any damage to Council Property, and for the removal from Council Property of any waste bin, building materials, sediment, silt, or any other material or article.
c) The Infrastructure Restoration Fee must be paid to the Council by the applicant prior to both the issue of the Construction Certificate and the commencement of any earthworks or construction.
d) In consideration of payment of the Infrastructure Restorations Fee, Council will undertake such inspections of Council Property as Council considers necessary and also undertake, on behalf of the applicant, such restoration work to Council Property, if any, that Council considers necessary as a consequence of the development. The provision of such restoration work by the Council does not absolve any person of the responsibilities contained in (a) to (b) above. Restoration work to be undertaken by the Council referred to in this condition is limited to work that can be undertaken by Council at a cost of not more than the Infrastructure Restorations Fee payable pursuant to this condition.
e) In this condition:
“Council Property” includes any road, footway, footpath paving, kerbing, guttering, crossings, street furniture, seats, letter bins, trees, shrubs, lawns, mounds, bushland, and similar structures or features on any road or public road within the meaning of the Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) or any public place; and
“Infrastructure Restoration Fee” means the Infrastructure Restorations Fee calculated in accordance with the Schedule of Fees & Charges adopted by Council as at the date of payment and the cost of any inspections required by the Council of Council Property associated with this condition.
Reason: To maintain public infrastructure.
39. Section 94 development contributions - other than identified centres (For DAs determined on or after 19 December 2010).
Reason: To ensure the provision, extension or augmentation of the Key Community Infrastructure identified in Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 that will, or is likely to be, required as a consequence of the development.
Conditions to be satisfied during the demolition, excavation and construction phases:
40. Road opening permit
The opening of any footway, roadway, road shoulder or any part of the road reserve shall not be carried out without a road opening permit being obtained from Council (upon payment of the required fee) beforehand.
Reason: Statutory requirement (Roads Act 1993 Section 138) and to maintain the integrity of Council’s infrastructure.
41. Prescribed conditions
The applicant shall comply with any relevant prescribed conditions of development consent under clause 98 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation. For the purposes of section 80A (11) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, the following conditions are prescribed in relation to a development consent for development that involves any building work:
· The work must be carried out in accordance with the requirements of the Building Code of Australia · In the case of residential building work for which the Home Building Act 1989 requires there to be a contract of insurance in force in accordance with Part 6 of that Act, that such a contract of insurance is in force before any works commence.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
42. Hours of work
Demolition, excavation, construction work and deliveries of building material and equipment must not take place outside the hours of 7.00am to 5.00pm Monday to Friday and 8.00am to 12 noon Saturday. No work and no deliveries are to take place on Sundays and public holidays.
Excavation or removal of any materials using machinery of any kind, including compressors and jack hammers, must be limited to between 7.30am and 5.00pm Monday to Friday, with a respite break of 45 minutes between 12 noon 1.00pm.
Where it is necessary for works to occur outside of these hours (ie) placement of concrete for large floor areas on large residential/commercial developments or where building processes require the use of oversized trucks and/or cranes that are restricted by the RTA from travelling during daylight hours to deliver, erect or remove machinery, tower cranes, pre-cast panels, beams, tanks or service equipment to or from the site, approval for such activities will be subject to the issue of an "outside of hours works permit" from Council as well as notification of the surrounding properties likely to be affected by the proposed works.
Note: Failure to obtain a permit to work outside of the approved hours will result in on the spot fines being issued.
Reason: To ensure reasonable standards of amenity for occupants of neighbouring properties.
43. Approved plans to be on site
A copy of all approved and certified plans, specifications and documents incorporating conditions of consent and certification (including the Construction Certificate if required for the work) shall be kept on site at all times during the demolition, excavation and construction phases and must be readily available to any officer of Council or the Principal Certifying Authority.
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
44. Statement of compliance with Australian Standards
The demolition work shall comply with the provisions of Australian Standard AS2601: 2001 The Demolition of Structures. The work plans required by AS2601: 2001 shall be accompanied by a written statement from a suitably qualified person that the proposal contained in the work plan comply with the safety requirements of the Standard. The work plan and the statement of compliance shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the commencement of any works.
Reason: To ensure compliance with the Australian Standards.
45. Site notice
A site notice shall be erected on the site prior to any work commencing and shall be displayed throughout the works period.
The site notice must:
· be prominently displayed at the boundaries of the site for the purposes of informing the public that unauthorised entry to the site is not permitted · display project details including, but not limited to the details of the builder, Principal Certifying Authority and structural engineer · be durable and weatherproof · display the approved hours of work, the name of the site/project manager, the responsible managing company (if any), its address and 24 hour contact phone number for any inquiries, including construction/noise complaint are to be displayed on the site notice · be mounted at eye level on the perimeter hoardings/fencing and is to state that unauthorised entry to the site is not permitted
Reason: To ensure public safety and public information.
46. Dust control
During excavation, demolition and construction, adequate measures shall be taken to prevent dust from affecting the amenity of the neighbourhood. The following measures must be adopted:
· physical barriers shall be erected at right angles to the prevailing wind direction or shall be placed around or over dust sources to prevent wind or activity from generating dust · earthworks and scheduling activities shall be managed to coincide with the next stage of development to minimise the amount of time the site is left cut or exposed · all materials shall be stored or stockpiled at the best locations · the ground surface should be dampened slightly to prevent dust from becoming airborne but should not be wet to the extent that run-off occurs · all vehicles carrying spoil or rubble to or from the site shall at all times be covered to prevent the escape of dust · all equipment wheels shall be washed before exiting the site using manual or automated sprayers and drive-through washing bays · gates shall be closed between vehicle movements and shall be fitted with shade cloth · cleaning of footpaths and roadways shall be carried out daily
Reason: To protect the environment and amenity of surrounding properties.
47. Post-construction dilapidation report
The applicant shall engage a suitably qualified person to prepare a post construction dilapidation report at the completion of the construction works. This report is to ascertain whether the construction works created any structural damage to adjoining buildings, infrastructure and roads. The report is to be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority. In ascertaining whether adverse structural damage has occurred to adjoining buildings, infrastructure and roads, the Principal Certifying Authority must:
· compare the post-construction dilapidation report with the pre-construction dilapidation report · have written confirmation from the relevant authority that there is no adverse structural damage to their infrastructure and roads.
A copy of this report is to be forwarded to Council at the completion of the construction works.
Reason: Management of records.
48. Compliance with submitted geotechnical report
A contractor with specialist excavation experience must undertake the excavations for the development and a suitably qualified and consulting geotechnical engineer must oversee excavation.
Geotechnical aspects of the development work, namely:
· appropriate excavation method and vibration control · support and retention of excavated faces · hydro-geological considerations
must be undertaken in accordance with the recommendations of the Geotechnical Investigation Ref: 14/03631 dated 31 March 2013 prepared by Michael Adler & Associates. Approval must be obtained from all affected property owners, including Ku-ring-gai Council, where rock anchors (both temporary and permanent) are proposed below adjoining property(ies).
Reason: To ensure the safety and protection of property.
49. Use of road or footpath
During excavation, demolition and construction phases, no building materials, plant or the like are to be stored on the road or footpath without written approval being obtained from Council beforehand. The pathway shall be kept in a clean, tidy and safe condition during building operations. Council reserves the right, without notice, to rectify any such breach and to charge the cost against the applicant/owner/builder, as the case may be.
Reason: To ensure safety and amenity of the area.
50. Guarding excavations
All excavation, demolition and construction works shall be properly guarded and protected with hoardings or fencing to prevent them from being dangerous to life and property.
Reason: To ensure public safety.
51. Toilet facilities
During excavation, demolition and construction phases, toilet facilities are to be provided, on the work site, at the rate of one toilet for every 20 persons or part of 20 persons employed at the site.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
52. Protection of public places
If the work involved in the erection, demolition or construction of the development is likely to cause pedestrian or vehicular traffic in a public place to be obstructed or rendered inconvenient, or building involves the enclosure of a public place, a hoarding or fence must be erected between the work site and the public place.
If necessary, a hoarding is to be erected, sufficient to prevent any substance from, or in connection with, the work falling into the public place.
The work site must be kept lit between sunset and sunrise if it is likely to be hazardous to persons in the public place.
Any hoarding, fence or awning is to be removed when the work has been completed.
Reason: To protect public places.
53. Recycling of building material (general)
During demolition and construction, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that building materials suitable for recycling have been forwarded to an appropriate registered business dealing in recycling of materials. Materials to be recycled must be kept in good order.
Reason: To facilitate recycling of materials.
54. Construction signage
All construction signs must comply with the following requirements:
· are not to cover any mechanical ventilation inlet or outlet vent · are not illuminated, self-illuminated or flashing at any time · are located wholly within a property where construction is being undertaken · refer only to the business(es) undertaking the construction and/or the site at which the construction is being undertaken · are restricted to one such sign per property · do not exceed 2.5m2 · are removed within 14 days of the completion of all construction works
Reason: To ensure compliance with Council's controls regarding signage.
55. Road reserve safety
All public footways and roadways fronting and adjacent to the site must be maintained in a safe condition at all times during the course of the development works. Construction materials must not be stored in the road reserve. A safe pedestrian circulation route and a pavement/route free of trip hazards must be maintained at all times on or adjacent to any public access ways fronting the construction site. Where public infrastructure is damaged, repair works must be carried out when and as directed by Council officers. Where pedestrian circulation is diverted on to the roadway or verge areas, clear directional signage and protective barricades must be installed in accordance with AS1742-3 (1996) “Traffic Control Devices for Work on Roads”. If pedestrian circulation is not satisfactorily maintained across the site frontage, and action is not taken promptly to rectify the defects, Council may undertake proceedings to stop work.
Reason: To ensure safe public footways and roadways during construction.
56. Services
Where required, the adjustment or inclusion of any new utility service facilities must be carried out by the applicant and in accordance with the requirements of the relevant utility authority. These works shall be at no cost to Council. It is the applicants’ full responsibility to make contact with the relevant utility authorities to ascertain the impacts of the proposal upon utility services (including water, phone, gas and the like). Council accepts no responsibility for any matter arising from its approval to this application involving any influence upon utility services provided by another authority.
Reason: Provision of utility services.
57. Structures to be clear of drainage easements
During all phases of demolition, excavation and construction, it is the full responsibility of the applicant and their contractors to:
· ascertain the exact location of the Council drainage pipe traversing the site in the vicinity of the works · take full measures to protect the in-ground Council drainage system · ensure dedicated overland flow paths are satisfactorily maintained through the site
Drainage pipes can be damaged through applying excessive loading (such as construction machinery, material storage and the like). All proposed structures and construction activities are to be sited fully clear of Council drainage pipes, drainage easements, watercourses and trunk overland flow paths on the site. Trunk or dedicated overland flow paths must not be impeded or diverted by fill or structures unless otherwise approved.
If a Council drainage pipeline is uncovered during construction, all work is to cease and the Principal Certifying Authority and Council must be contacted immediately for advice. Any damage caused to a Council drainage system must be immediately repaired in full as directed and at no cost to Council.
Reason: To protect existing Council infrastructure and maintain over land flow paths.
58. Erosion control
Temporary sediment and erosion control and measures are to be installed prior to the commencement of any works on the site. These measures must be maintained in working order during construction works up to completion. All sediment traps must be cleared on a regular basis and after each major storm and/or as directed by the Principal Certifying Authority and Council officers.
Reason: To protect the environment from erosion and sedimentation.
59. Sydney Water Section 73 Compliance Certificate
The applicant must obtain a Section 73 Compliance Certificate under the Sydney Water Act 1994. An application must be made through an authorised Water Servicing Co-ordinator. The applicant is to refer to “Your Business” section of Sydney Water’s web site at www.sydneywater.com.au <http://www.sydneywater.com.au> then the “e-develop” icon or telephone 13 20 92. Following application a “Notice of Requirements” will detail water and sewer extensions to be built and charges to be paid. Please make early contact with the Co-ordinator, since building of water/sewer extensions can be time consuming and may impact on other services and building, driveway or landscape design.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
60. Arborist’s report
The tree/s to be retained shall be inspected, monitored and treated by a qualified Arborist during and after completion of development works to ensure their long term survival. Regular inspections and documentation from the Arborist to the Principal Certifying Authority are required at the following times or phases of work:
Reason: To ensure protection of existing trees.
61. Treatment of tree roots
If tree roots are severed for the purposes of constructing the approved works, they shall be cut cleanly by hand, by an experienced AQF3 Arborist/Horticulturist. All pruning works shall be undertaken as specified in Australian Standard 4373-2007 - Pruning of Amenity Trees.
Reason: To protect existing trees.
62. Cutting of tree roots
No tree roots of 30mm or greater in diameter located within the specified radius of the trunk/s of the following tree/s shall be severed or injured in the process of any works during the construction period. All pruning works shall be undertaken as specified in Australian Standard 4373-2007 - Pruning of Amenity Trees:
Reason: To protect existing trees.
63. Approved tree works
Approval is given for the following works to be undertaken to trees on the site. ALL trees shall be clearly tagged and identified consistent with the Arboricultural Impact Assessment Report by Landscape Matrix dated 11/04/2014, prior to ANY tree works being undertaken.
Removal or pruning of any other tree on the site is not approved, excluding species exempt under Council’s Tree Preservation Order.
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
64. Excavation near trees
No mechanical excavation shall be undertaken within the specified radius of the trunk/s of the following tree/s until root pruning by hand by an AQF3 Arborist along the perimeter line of such works is completed:
Reason: To protect existing trees.
65. Hand excavation
All excavation within the specified radius of the trunk/s of the following tree/s shall be hand dug:
Reason: To protect existing trees.
66. No storage of materials beneath trees
No activities, storage or disposal of materials shall take place beneath the canopy of any tree protected under Council's Tree Preservation Order at any time.
Reason: To protect existing trees.
67. Removal of refuse
All builders' refuse, spoil and/or material unsuitable for use in landscape areas shall be removed from the site on completion of the building works.
Reason: To protect the environment.
68. On site retention of waste dockets
All demolition, excavation and construction waste dockets are to be retained on site, or at suitable location, in order to confirm which facility received materials generated from the site for recycling or disposal.
· Each docket is to be an official receipt from a facility authorised to accept the material type, for disposal or processing. · This information is to be made available at the request of an Authorised Officer of Council.
Reason: To protect the environment.
Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate:
69. Easement for waste collection
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, an easement for waste collection is to be created under Section 88B of the Conveyancing Act 1919. This is to permit legal access for Council, Council’s contractors and their vehicles over the subject property for the purpose of collecting waste from the property. The terms of the easement are to be generally in accordance with Council’s draft terms for an easement for waste collection and shall be to the satisfaction of Council’s Development Engineer.
Reason: To permit legal access for Council, Council’s contractors and their vehicles over the subject site for waste collection.
70. Construction Standards - Housing for Seniors or People with a Disability
Prior to the issue of an occupation certificate or occupation of the development (whichever comes first), certification shall be provided from an accredited access consultant to the certifying authority which demonstrates that the fit out and construction of the development satisfies the design criteria of SEPP (Housing for Seniors or People with a Disability) 2004.
Reason: To ensure compliance with SEPP (Housing for Seniors or People with a Disability) 2004.
71. Compliance with BASIX Certificate
Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that all commitments listed in BASIX Certificate No. 537335M_03 have been complied with.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
72. Clotheslines and clothes dryers
Prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the units either have access to an external clothes line located in common open space or have a mechanical clothes dryer installed.
Reason: To provide access to clothes drying facilities.
73. Mechanical ventilation
Following completion, installation and testing of all the mechanical ventilation systems, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied of the following prior to the issue of any Occupation Certificate:
1. The installation and performance of the mechanical systems complies with:
· The Building Code of Australia · Australian Standard AS1668 · Australian Standard AS3666 where applicable
2. The mechanical ventilation system in isolation and in association with other mechanical ventilation equipment, when in operation will not be audible within a habitable room in any other residential premises before 7am and after 10pm Monday to Friday and before 8am and after 10pm Saturday, Sunday and public holidays. The operation of the unit outside these restricted hours shall emit a noise level of not greater than 5dbA above the background when measured at the nearest adjoining boundary.
Note: Written confirmation from an acoustic engineer that the development achieves the above requirements is to be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate.
Reason: To protect the amenity of surrounding properties.
74. Completion of landscape works
Prior to the release of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that all landscape works, including the removal of all noxious and/or environmental weed species, have been undertaken in accordance with the approved plan(s) and conditions of consent.
Reason: To ensure that the landscape works are consistent with the development consent.
75. Accessibility
Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that:
· the lift design and associated functions are compliant with AS 1735.12 & AS 1428.2 · the level and direction of travel, both in lifts and lift lobbies, is audible and visible · the controls for lifts are accessible to all persons and control buttons and lettering are raised · international symbols have been used with specifications relating to signs, symbols and size of lettering complying with AS 1428.2 · the height of lettering on signage is in accordance with AS 1428.1 - 1993 · the signs and other information indicating access and services incorporate tactile communication methods in addition to the visual methods
Reason: Disabled access & services.
76. Retention and re-use positive covenant
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the applicant must create a positive covenant and restriction on the use of land under Section 88E of the Conveyancing Act 1919, burdening the property with the requirement to maintain the site stormwater retention and re-use facilities on the property.
The terms of the instruments are to be generally in accordance with the Council's "draft terms of Section 88B instruments for protection of retention and re-use facilities" and to the satisfaction of Council (refer to appendices of Ku-ring-gai Water Management Development Control Plan No. 47). For existing titles, the positive covenant and the restriction on the use of land is to be created through an application to the Land Titles Office in the form of a request using forms 13PC and 13RPA. The relative location of the reuse and retention facility, in relation to the building footprint, must be shown on a scale sketch, attached as an annexure to the request forms.
Registered title documents showing the covenants and restrictions must be submitted to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate.
Reason: To protect the environment.
77. Provision of copy of OSD designs if Council is not the PCA
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the following must be provided to Council’s Development Engineer:
· A copy of the approved Construction Certificate stormwater detention/retention design for the site · A copy of any works-as-executed drawings required by this consent · The Engineer’s certification of the as-built system.
Reason: For Council to maintain its database of as-constructed on-site stormwater detention systems.
78. Certification of drainage works
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that:
· the stormwater drainage works have been satisfactorily completed in accordance with the approved Construction Certificate drainage plans · the minimum retention and on-site detention storage volume requirements of BASIX and Ku-ring-gai Water Management Development Control Plan No. 47 respectively, have been achieved · retained water is connected and available for use · basement and subsoil areas are able to drain via a pump/sump system installed in accordance with AS3500.3 and Appendix 7.1.1 of Ku-ring-gai Water Management Development Control Plan No. 47 · all grates potentially accessible by children are secured · components of the new drainage system have been installed by a licensed plumbing contractor in accordance with the Plumbing and Drainage Code AS3500.3 2003 and the Building Code of Australia · all enclosed floor areas, including habitable and garage floor levels, are safeguarded from outside stormwater runoff ingress by suitable differences in finished levels, gradings and provision of stormwater collection devices
The rainwater certification sheet contained in Appendix 13 of the Ku-ring-gai Water Management Development Control Plan No. 47, must be completed and attached to the certification. Where an on-site detention system has been constructed, the on-site detention certification sheet contained in Appendix 4 of DCP 47 must also be completed and attached to the certification.
Note: Evidence from a qualified and experienced consulting civil/hydraulic engineer documenting compliance with the above is to be provided to Council prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate.
Reason: To protect the environment.
79. WAE plans for stormwater management and disposal
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, a registered surveyor must provide a works as executed survey of the completed stormwater drainage and management systems. The survey must be submitted to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate. The survey must indicate:
· as built (reduced) surface and invert levels for all drainage pits · gradients of drainage lines, materials and dimensions · as built (reduced) level(s) at the approved point of discharge to the public drainage system · as built location and internal dimensions of all detention and retention structures on the property (in plan view) and horizontal distances to nearest adjacent boundaries and structures on site · the achieved storage volumes of the installed retention and detention storages and derivative calculations · as built locations of all access pits and grates in the detention and retention system(s), including dimensions · the size of the orifice or control fitted to any on-site detention system · dimensions of the discharge control pit and access grates · the maximum depth of storage possible over the outlet control · top water levels of storage areas and indicative RL’s through the overland flow path in the event of blockage of the on-site detention system
The works as executed plan(s) must show the as built details above in comparison to those shown on the drainage plans approved with the Construction Certificate prior to commencement of works. All relevant levels and details indicated must be marked in red on a copy of the Principal Certifying Authority stamped construction certificate stormwater plans.
Reason: To protect the environment.
80. Basement pump-out maintenance
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a maintenance regime has been prepared for the basement stormwater pump-out system.
Note: A maintenance regime specifying that the system is to be regularly inspected and checked by qualified practitioners is to be prepared by a suitable qualified professional and provided to the Principal Certifying Authority.
Reason: To protect the environment.
81. OSD positive covenant/restriction
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the applicant must create a positive covenant and restriction on the use of land under Section 88E of the Conveyancing Act 1919, burdening the owner with the requirement to maintain the on-site stormwater detention facilities on the lot.
The terms of the instruments are to be generally in accordance with the Council's "draft terms of Section 88B instrument for protection of on-site detention facilities" and to the satisfaction of Council (refer to appendices of Ku-ring-gai Council Water Management DCP 47). For existing titles, the positive covenant and the restriction on the use of land is to be created through an application to the Land Titles Office in the form of a request using forms 13PC and 13RPA. The relative location of the on-site detention facility, in relation to the building footprint, must be shown on a scale sketch, attached as an annexure to the request forms.
Registered title documents, showing the covenants and restrictions, must be submitted and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate.
Reason: To protect the environment.
82. Sydney Water Section 73 Compliance Certificate
Prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate the Section 73 Sydney water Compliance Certificate must be obtained and submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority
Reason: Statutory requirement.
83. Reinstatement of redundant crossings and completion of infrastructure works
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority must be satisfied that he or she has received a signed inspection form from Council which states that the following works in the road reserve have been completed:
· new concrete driveway crossing in accordance with levels and specifications issued by Council · removal of all redundant driveway crossings and kerb laybacks (or sections thereof) and reinstatement of these areas to footpath, turfed verge and upright kerb and gutter (reinstatement works to match surrounding adjacent infrastructure with respect to integration of levels and materials) · full repair and resealing of any road surface damaged during construction · full replacement of damaged sections of grass verge to match existing
This inspection may not be carried out by the Private Certifier because restoration of Council property outside the boundary of the site is not a matter listed in Clause 161 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000.
All works must be completed in accordance with the General Specification for the Construction of Road and Drainage Works in Ku-ring-gai Council, dated November 2004. The Occupation Certificate must not be issued until all damaged public infrastructure caused as a result of construction works on the subject site (including damage caused by, but not limited to, delivery vehicles, waste collection, contractors, sub-contractors, concrete vehicles) is fully repaired to the satisfaction of Council. Repair works shall be at no cost to Council.
Reason: To protect the streetscape.
84. Construction of works in public road - approved plans
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority must be satisfied that all approved road, footpath and/or drainage works have been completed in the road reserve in accordance with the Council Roads Act approval and accompanying drawings, conditions and specifications.
The works must be supervised by the applicant’s designing engineer and completed and approved to the satisfaction of Ku-ring-gai Council.
The supervising consulting engineer is to provide certification upon completion that the works were constructed in accordance with the Council approved stamped drawings. The works must be subject to inspections by Council at the hold points noted on the Roads Act approval. All conditions attached to the approved drawings for these works must be met prior to the Occupation Certificate being issued.
Reason: To ensure that works undertaken in the road reserve are to the satisfaction of Council.
85. Infrastructure repair
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority must be satisfied that any damaged public infrastructure caused as a result of construction works (including damage caused by, but not limited to, delivery vehicles, waste collection, contractors, sub-contractors, concrete vehicles) is fully repaired to the satisfaction of Council Development Engineer and at no cost to Council.
Reason: To protect public infrastructure.
86. Fire safety certificate
Prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a Fire Safety Certificate for all the essential fire or other safety measures forming part of this consent has been completed and provided to Council.
Note: A copy of the Fire Safety Certificate must be submitted to Council.
Reason: To ensure suitable fire safety measures are in place.
87. Restriction on land title - seniors living development
Prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that restriction as to use of land under Section 88E of the Conveyancing Act 1919, has been created restricting the occupation of the premises to:
· people 55 or over or people who have a disability · people who live with people 55 or over or people who have a disability · staff employed to assist in the administration of and provision of services to housing provided in this development
Reason: To ensure that the development meets the provisions of the Seniors Living SEPP. Conditions to be satisfied at all times:
88. Outdoor lighting
At all times for the life of the approved development, all outdoor lighting shall not detrimentally impact upon the amenity of other premises and adjacent dwellings and shall comply with, where relevant, AS/NZ1158.3: 2005 Pedestrian Area (Category P) Lighting and AS4282: 1997 Control of the Obtrusive Effects of Outdoor Lighting.
Reason: To protect the amenity of surrounding properties.
89. Noise control - plant and machinery
All noise generating equipment associated with any proposed mechanical ventilation system/s shall be located and/or soundproofed so the equipment is not audible within a habitable room in any other residential premises before 7am and after 10pm Monday to Friday and before 8am and after 10pm Saturday, Sunday and public holidays. The operation of the unit outside these restricted hours shall emit a noise level of not greater than 5dbA above the background when measured at the nearest boundary.
Reason: To protect the amenity of surrounding residents.
90. Car parking
At all times, the visitor car parking spaces are to be clearly identified and are to be for the exclusive use of visitors to the site. On site permanent car parking spaces are not to be used by those other than an occupant or tenant of the subject building. Any occupant, tenant, lessee or registered proprietor of the development site or part thereof shall not enter into an agreement to lease, license or transfer ownership of any car parking spaces to those other than an occupant, tenant or lessee of the building. These requirements are to be enforced through the following:
· restrictive covenant placed on title pursuant to Section 88B of the Conveyancing Act, 1919 · restriction on use under Section 68 of the Strata Schemes (Leasehold Development) Act, 1986 to all lots comprising in part or whole car parking spaces
Reason: To ensure adequate provision of visitor parking spaces.
91. Height of fences, walls and screens
The overall height of any and all proposed fences, walls and courtyard or balcony screens shall not exceed 1800mm above the existing ground level.
Reason: To maintain the established streetscape and ensure consistency of fencing to the development and area.
92. Delete reference to fencing
All reference to the prefinished picket fence along the eastern side boundary is to be deleted as side and rear fencing is a civil matter under the Dividing Fences Act.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
|
196 |
Consideration of Submissions on the Planning Proposal to Heritage List 5 Properties in Turramurra, Wahroonga, Pymble and Killara
File: S10453 Vide: GB.4
|
|
The following members of the public addressed Council:
S Judd
|
|
For Council to consider the submissions received during the public exhibition of the planning proposal to heritage list 5 properties in Turramurra, Wahroonga, Pymble and Killara.
|
|
(Moved: Councillors Citer/Berlioz)
A. That Council endorse the Planning proposal to list additional properties in Schedule 5 and the Heritage Map of the Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan 2015; subject to the proposal being varied to only apply to 12 Bobbin Head Road, Pymble and 88 Fox Valley Road, Wahroonga.
B. That Council proceed to make the Plan under delegated authority under Section 59 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.
C. That those who made a submission be notified of Council’s resolution.
D. That a condition of consent for any application to demolish 4-6 Neringah Avenue South, Wahroonga be as follows:
Interpretation Plan (Special Condition CNDD001)
Prior to any demolition works commencing on the site, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that an Interpretation Plan has been submitted to and endorsed by Council.
An Interpretation Plan is a document that provides policies and details advice for interpreting the heritage significance of the building and includes detail about the interpretation media. Media can include signs, installations, displays, films, brochures or other means of communication. The Interpretation Plan shall be prepared by a suitably qualified and experienced person.
The media chosen is to clearly help the public understand and convey the significance of the building and shall be approved prior to any works occurring on site. The Media is to be installed within 14 days of demolition being completed.
Reason: To ensure the identified heritage significance of the building is interpreted via appropriate media for future generations.
E. That Council defers any decision in regards to 6 Caithness Street and 33 Grandview Street for a Council briefing from a Heritage expert.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
|
197 |
Ku-ring-gai Art Society - Annual Awards Exhibition and Purchase of Art Works
File: S02173 Vide: GB.1
|
|
To respond to the resolution of Council on 7 October 2014 requesting a report to Council about the annual purchase of art works from the Ku-ring-gai Art Society (KAS).
|
|
(Moved: Councillors Malicki/Pettett)
A. That Council continues the annual practice of the Mayor purchasing art work from the Ku-ring-gai Art Society to the value of $1,000 and this to be reflected in the Mayor’s Delegations of Authority.
B. That there is to be a Councillor discussion held with all interested Councillors on Council’s art collection and the use and future of the items in the collection.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY |
Council resolved that the meeting be closed during the discussion of the matters GB.6 Tender RFT5-2015 - Cameron Park Extension in accordance with Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993 on the basis that the items involve the receipt and discussion of information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a competitor of the Council or prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it. This resolution was moved by Councillors Berlioz and McDonald and was
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
On balance, the public interest in preserving the confidentiality of information about GB.6 Tender RFT5-2015 - Cameron Park Extension outweighs the public interest in maintaining openness and transparency in Council decision-making because the disclosure of the information would prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it and may in the future result in the withholding of such information by tenderers and a reduction in the provision of information relevant to Council’s decision
Council Resolved to return to Open Council after a Motion
moved by Councillors Berlioz and McDonald and
was CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
198 |
Tender RFT5-2015 - Cameron Park Extension
File: S10025 Vide: GB.6
|
|
To consider the tenders received for the rebuild and extension of Cameron Park, Turramurra, and appoint the preferred tenderer.
|
|
(Moved: Councillors McDonald/Berlioz)
A. That Council accept the tender submission from Tenderer ‘A’ to carry out the upgrade and extension works which includes improved children’s play area, BBQ facilities, shelter, outdoor table tennis facility, increased lawn areas and improved landscaping at Cameron Park, Turramurra.
B. That Council approve the balance of funds required to be transferred from Section 94 funds as detailed in Attachment 1 to the project.
C. That the Mayor and General Manager be delegated authority to execute all tender documents on Council’s behalf in relation to the contract.
D. That the Seal of Council be affixed to all necessary documents.
E. That all tenderers be advised of Councils decision in accordance with Clause 178 of the Local Government Act and Tender Regulation.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
|
199 |
205 Eastern Road Wahroonga - 102 Place Child Care Centre (DA0179/15)
File: DA0179/15 Vide: QN.1
|
|
Question Without Notice from Councillor Duncan McDonald.
Would the Director please advise (now or if you could please get back to me) the progress of this Development Application. I would like to bring this to Council for debate if it is considered as approval.
I already have some major concerns with traffic, around that site and I don’t know if I am allowed to embellish this any further than this statement.
Answer by Director Development and Regulations
The Director advised he will provide a progress report.
In relation to calling the matter to Council that shouldn’t really form part of a Question Without Notice as there is a separate process for that. If Councillor McDonald wishes to do so there is a process you can follow separately.
Deputy Mayor Chantelle Fornari-Orsmond advised she is also getting a briefing on this application on Wednesday 15 July 2015.(
|
200 |
Stolen Sundial – Lookout Park Turramurra
File: S05258 Vide: QN.2
|
|
Question Without Notice from Councillor Elaine Malicki.
There used to be a sundial in Lookout Park at Turramurra and the bronze sundial was stolen several years ago. When is this to be replaced on its column please?
Answer by Director Operations
The Director Operations will respond with a memorandum with regards to where it is. It was actually stolen and Council is in the process of obtaining a replacement.
|
201 |
Update regarding Upgrades and Leasing of 828 Pacific Highway Gordon
File: S09582 Vide: QN.3
|
|
Question Without Notice from Councillor Elaine Malicki.
Can Councillors have an update on 828 Pacific Highway, any upgrades and leasing proposed?
Answer by General Manager
The General Manager advised he will review it with the Directors and provide an update to Councillors.
|
The Meeting closed at 8.15pm
The Minutes of the Ordinary Meeting of Council held on 14 July 2015 (Pages 1 - 76) were confirmed as a full and accurate record of proceedings on 28 July 2015.
__________________________ __________________________
General Manager Mayor / Chairperson
Ordinary Meeting of Council - 28 July 2015 |
GB.1 / 77 |
|
|
Item GB.1 |
S08654 |
|
14 July 2015 |
The Hornsby Ku-ring-gai Women's Shelter Annual Gala Dinner
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
purpose of report: |
To advise Council of an invitation from the Hornsby Ku-ring-gai Women’s Shelter Inc. to purchase tickets for their Annual Gala Dinner on Saturday 15 August 2015. |
|
|
background: |
The Hornsby Ku-ring-gai Women’s Shelter fills a much needed gap in emergency housing for victims of domestic violence and homelessness. Since the official launch in December 2014 and opening its doors to clients in January 2015, the shelter has been at capacity. |
|
|
comments: |
The Women’s Shelter receives no government funding and is entirely dependent on donations. Proceeds raised from the Gala Dinner will help in providing temporary supported accommodation for women in times of crisis such as homelessness and/or domestic violence. |
|
|
recommendation: |
That Council purchase a table of 10 tickets for the Hornsby Ku-ring-gai Women’s Shelter Annual Gala Dinner for $650.00, and that Councillors who are interested in attending the dinner advise the General Manager by Friday 31 July 2015.
|
Purpose of Report
To advise Council of an invitation from the Hornsby Ku-ring-gai Women’s Shelter Inc. to purchase tickets for their Annual Gala Dinner on Saturday 15 August 2015.
Background
The Hornsby Ku-ring-gai Women’s Shelter fills a much needed gap in emergency housing for victims of domestic violence and homelessness. Since the official launch in December 2014 and opening its doors to clients in January 2015, the shelter has been at capacity. The board and supporting committees consist of dedicated, unpaid volunteers.
The Hornsby Ku-ring-gai Women’s Shelter is one of only two women’s shelters or crisis accommodation on the North Shore; the other is in Manly, together they provide 22 beds. Most women are homeless due to domestic violence.
The Hornsby Ku-ring-gai Women’s Shelter exists to:
· Provide temporary supported accommodation for women in times of crisis such as homelessness and/or domestic violence.
· Provide a safe non-threatening environment for women that will assist them through their emotional and physical crisis.
· Inform and empower women to make active decisions about their lives and encourage them to seek alternatives and options using a participative management approach.
· Create an environment where women can share skills, ideas and information and with support from shelter workers help each other to work through their skills.
· Provide services to all women who can self-manage regardless of their age, sexuality, cultural and linguistic diversity, disability, or mental illness.
· Advocate on behalf of women experiencing domestic violence, ensuring they have access to resources and can live their life safe and free from fear.
· Liaise and coordinate services with other non-government organisations and community agencies.
· Raise awareness in government, other services and the community about homelessness and domestic violence and the impact it has on women and their families.
· Engage in structural advocacy to improve service and legal response to women experiencing homelessness and domestic violence.
Comments
The Hornsby Lions Club is hosting a Gala Dinner in support of the Hornsby Ku-ring-gai Women’s Shelter Inc. on Saturday 15 August 2015 at the Hornsby RSL Club, 4 High Street Hornsby. The funds raised will assist in providing regular income for the ongoing expenses of the shelter, which provides crisis accommodation for women escaping domestic violence.
Individual tickets for the Gala Dinner are $65.00 per person and a table of 10 is $650.00.
A copy of the Annual Gala Dinner invitation is attached to this report. (Attachment)
integrated planning and reporting
Community People and Culture
Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective |
Delivery Program Term Achievement |
Operational Plan Task |
C1.1.1
|
Council’s policies, programs and advocacy address the social and health needs of all age groups, reduce disadvantage and address gaps in service provision.
|
Effective responses are made to the changing needs of the community.
|
Governance Matters
In accordance with Council’s ‘Policy for the Payment of Expenses and Provision of Facilities to Councillors’ - Local Travel Arrangements, Attendance at Dinners and Other Non-Council Functions:
Council shall meet the cost of Councillors’ attendance at functions that are of a formal or ceremonial nature within the Sydney metropolitan area, including functions for charities, community service and sporting groups supported by Council or of which Council is a financial member. Council shall also meet the cost of Councillors’ attendance at dinners and other non-council functions which provide briefings to Councillors from key members of the community, politicians and business where the function is relevant to Council’s interest. Council shall meet the cost of any component of the ticket to the function that is a donation to a registered charity but shall not meet the cost of any component of the ticket that is a donation to a political party, candidate’s electoral fund or other private benefit. Each Councillor is entitled to a maximum of $1,029 per year of term for external payments in respect of the types of expenses described in this paragraph.
Risk Management
There are no identified risk management matters associated with this report.
Financial Considerations
Council has been invited to support the Hornsby Ku-ring-gai Women’s Shelter Inc. by purchasing tickets for the Gala Dinner. Individual tickets are $65.00 each and tables of 10 are available for $650.00. Funds are available in the 2015/16 budget for the purchase of a table of 10 tickets for the Gala Dinner.
Social Considerations
The Hornsby Ku-ring-gai Women’s Shelter fills a much needed gap in emergency housing for victims of domestic violence and homelessness in the community. Through contributing to the Gala Dinner Council will be supporting this very important cause.
Council’s involvement will also assist in raising awareness in government, other services and in the community about homelessness and domestic violence and the impact it has on women and their families.
Environmental Considerations
There are no identified environmental considerations associated with this report.
Community Consultation
Community consultation was not required to inform this report.
Internal Consultation
The Civic and Corporate departments have been consulted in the writing of this report.
Summary
Council has received an invitation to purchase tickets for The Hornsby Ku-ring-gai Women’s Shelter Annual Gala Dinner to be held on Saturday 15 August 2015 at Hornsby RSL Club, 4 High Street Hornsby. Individual tickets are $65.00 each and tables of 10 are available for $650.00.
This report recommends Council purchase a table of 10 tickets for $650.00 for the Gala Dinner.
A. That Council purchase a table of 10 tickets for $650.00 for The Hornsby Ku-ring-gai Women’s Shelter Annual Gala Dinner on Saturday 15 August 2015.
B. That any Councillors who would like to attend The Hornsby Ku-ring-gai Women’s Shelter Annual Gala Dinner advise the General Manager by Friday 31 July 2015.
|
Virginia Leafe Manager Corporate Communications |
Janice Bevan Director Community |
A1View |
The Hornsby Ku-ring-gai Women's Shelter Annual Gala Dinner Flyer - 15 August 2015 |
|
2015/181150 |
APPENDIX No: 1 - The Hornsby Ku-ring-gai Women's Shelter Annual Gala Dinner Flyer - 15 August 2015 |
|
Item No: GB.1 |
Ordinary Meeting of Council - 28 July 2015 |
GB.2 / 82 |
|
|
Item GB.2 |
S10123 |
|
26 August 2014 |
Tender T04/2014 - Offsite Records Storage and Retrieval Services
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
purpose of report: |
To consider the tenders received for the offsite storage and retrieval services for Council’s records. |
|
|
background: |
Council currently stores a significant portion of its records at an off-site storage facility with the Government Records Repository. In anticipation of a move of Council’s administration building to 828 Pacific Highway Gordon, a tender was called for the offsite storage and retrieval services of Council’s records. |
|
|
comments: |
The tender was advertised from 29 April 2014 to 22 May 2014 with a total of four (4) submissions received. The Tender Evaluation Committee conducted a preliminary assessment of the tenders. However a number of significant assumptions for the tender were based on Council’s intended move at the time into the building at 828 Pacific Highway Gordon. Council’s recent decision to defer the move significantly impacts on the financial and other calculations used in the assessment of the tender as advertised. |
|
|
recommendation: |
That Council, in accordance with clause 178(3)(a) of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005, declines to accept any of the tenders and cancels the proposal for the contract for offsite records storage and retrieval services.
|
Purpose of Report
To consider the tenders received for the offsite storage and retrieval services for Council’s records.
Background
Council currently stores a significant portion of its records at an off-site storage facility with the Government Records Repository. In anticipation of a move of Council’s administration building to 828 Pacific Highway Gordon, a tender was called for the offsite storage and retrieval services of Council’s records.
Council sought tenders from suitably qualified and experienced tenderers for the provision of records storage and retrieval services for its semi-active and inactive physical records. The services must be provided in accordance with Council’s legislative obligations concerning records storage, disposal and access.
The records storage and retrieval services provider would be required to provide:
· Storage of records in a variety of media and formats including hard copy physical records, magnetic media, metal plan cabinets and other miscellaneous formats
· Security and protection of those records
· Pickup of and delivery of records to Council’s Civic Administration Building
· Ready access to records by Council’s authorised staff
· Accurate and complete information of the Council’s records which are stored with the provider
· A web-based portal to search/request records held in offsite storage
The term of the contract was anticipated to be for an initial period of five (5) years with an option to extend for a further five (5) years at the discretion of Council.
Comments
The tender was advertised from 29 April 2014 to 22 May 2014 with a total of four (4) submissions received from the following companies:
· The Information Management Group
· Recall Information Management
· Grace Records Management
· Government Records Repository
A Tender Evaluation Committee was appointed to oversee the tender process and evaluate the tender submissions received. This Committee consisted of the following staff
· Manager Records and Governance
· Archives Officer
· Manager Strategic Projects
· Probity Advisor – Manager Procurement and Contracts
The purpose of the evaluation process was to select the tender that offers the best overall value for money to Council to provide the required service. The evaluation took into account such factors as:
· Recent and current experience in providing similar services which was to include relevant references
· Capability to provide a reliable and efficient service as well as the capacity to meet the volume of work required
· Specified personnel based on managerial capability, qualifications, experience and number of key personnel
· Ability to meet or exceed the requirements of the State Records Authority of NSW’s Standard on the Physical Storage of State Records (the Standard).
A number of key assumptions in terms of future capacity were provided to potential tenderers in the Request for Tender document as part of the tender specifications. A significant part of these assumptions were;
· the numbers of archive boxes of records currently held in offsite storage
· the numbers of additional archive boxes expected to be transferred offsite when Council relocated to 828 Pacific Highway Gordon
· the number of archive boxes anticipated to be lodged with the contractor for storage based on Council having relocated to 828 Pacific Highway Gordon.
Council’s recent decision to defer the relocation to 828 Pacific Highway Gordon has the potential to significantly affect these assumptions, and therefore, the pricing schedules provided by the tenderers. Further, it could be anticipated that Council’s current and future offsite records storage needs would considerably differ from those needs that were identified by the Tender Evaluation Committee and therefore it would be considered prudent to review the current situation before entering into any contractual arrangement for this service.
Attached to this report are a number of attachments including the Tender Evaluation Committee report (see Attachment A1) and the tender evaluation worksheets (see Attachment A2 and A3).
integrated planning and reporting
Leadership and Governance
Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective |
Delivery Program Term Achievement |
Operational Plan Task |
Ku-ring-gai is well led, managed and supported by ethical organisations which deliver projects and services to the community by listening, advocating and responding to their needs. |
Council services and programs are provided on the basis of equity, community priorities, and best value for money within available resources. |
Maintain Council's record management system and provide records management services.
|
Governance Matters
In accordance with the provisions of section 13 of the State Records Act 1998, the State Records Authority has the power to issue standards and codes of best practice for records management in public offices. The Standard on the Physical Storage of State Records is a standard that was issued by the Authority on 2 March 2012 and sets out principles for the proper protection and storage of State Records.
The provisions surrounding the acceptance of tenders are stated in clause 178 of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 which states:
178 Acceptance of tenders
(1) After considering the tenders submitted for a proposed contract, the council must either:
(a) accept the tender that, having regard to all the circumstances, appears to it to be the most advantageous, or
(b) decline to accept any of the tenders.
and further;
(3) A council that decides not to accept any of the tenders for a proposed contract or receives no tenders for the proposed contract must, by resolution, do one of the following:
(a) postphone or cancel the proposal for the contract
(b) invite, in accordance with clause 167, 168 or 169, fresh tenders based on the same or different details,
(c) invite, in accordance with clause 168, fresh applications from persons interested in tendering for the proposed contract
(d) invite, in accordance with clause 169, fresh applications from persons interested in tendering for contracts of the same kind as the proposed contract,
(e) enter into negotiations with any person (whether or not the person was a tenderer) with a view to entering into a contract in relation to the subject matter of the tender,
(f) carry out the requirements of the proposed contract itself.
Risk Management
There is a moderate risk to Council if it were to seek to enter into a contractual arrangement with a tenderer based on assumptions that have considerably changed since the writing of the Request for Tender document. A review of the current situation prior to entering into any such contract would be considered both prudent and acts as a risk mitigation strategy.
Financial Considerations
Council currently has sufficient funds to cover the costs of offsite records storage and retrievals in its recurrent budget for the 2015/2016 financial year.
Social Considerations
There are no social considerations associated with the recommendations in this report.
Environmental Considerations
There are no environmental considerations associated with the recommendations in this report.
Community Consultation
None undertaken or required.
Internal Consultation
None undertaken or required.
Summary
Council currently stores a significant number of its records at an off-site facility without an existing contract. This tender was called to establish a contract for the provision of these services and to conduct an open market testing process in accordance with Council’s procurement policy and governing legislation.
Council sought tenders from suitably qualified and experienced tenderers for the provision of records storage and retrieval services for its semi-active and inactive physical records. The services must be provided in accordance with Council’s legislative obligations concerning records storage, disposal and access.
The tender was advertised from 29 April 2014 to 22 May 2014 with a total of four (4) submissions received. The Tender Evaluation Committee conducted an assessment of those tender submissions.
Tenderers submitted their tender submissions based on a number of key assumptions in terms of future capacity were provided to potential tenderers in the Request for Tender document as part of the tender specifications. A significant part of these assumptions were;
· the numbers of archive boxes of records currently held in offsite storage
· the numbers of additional archive boxes expected to be transferred offsite when Council relocated to 828 Pacific Highway Gordon
· the number of archive boxes anticipated to be lodged with the contractor for storage based on Council having relocated to 828 Pacific Highway Gordon.
However, Council’s recent decision to defer the relocation to 828 Pacific Highway Gordon has the potential to significantly affect these assumptions, and therefore, the pricing schedules provided by the tenderers. Further, it could be anticipated that Council’s current and future offsite records storage needs would considerably differ from those needs that were originally identified by the Tender Evaluation Committee and therefore it would be considered prudent to review the current situation before entering into any contractual arrangement for this service.
That Council, in accordance with clause 178(3)(a) of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005, declines to accept any of the tenders and cancels the proposal for the contract for offsite records storage and retrieval services.
|
Matt Ryan Manager Records & Governance |
David Marshall Director Corporate |
Tender T04/2014 - Offsite Records Storage and Retrieval Services - Tender Evaluation Committee Report |
|
Confidential |
||
|
Tender T04/2014 - Offsite Records Storage and Retrieval Services - Evaluation Worksheet - All Submissions |
|
Confidential |
|
|
Tender T04/2014 - Offsite Records Storage and Retrieval Services - Short-listed Firms |
|
Confidential |
Ordinary Meeting of Council - 28 July 2015 |
GB.3 / 88 |
|
|
Item GB.3 |
S05273 |
|
15 July 2015 |
Investment Report as at 30 June 2015
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
purpose of report: |
To present Council’s investment portfolio performance for June 2015. |
|
|
background: |
Council’s investments are reported monthly to Council in accordance with the Local Government Act 1993, the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 and Council’s Investment Policy. |
|
|
comments: |
The net return on investments for the financial year to June 2015 was $3,898,000 against a revised budget of $3,699,000 giving an annual favourable variance of $199,000. |
|
|
recommendation: |
That the summary of investments performance for June 2015 be received and noted; and that the Certificate of the Responsible Accounting Officer be noted and report adopted. |
Purpose of Report
To present Council’s investment portfolio performance for June 2015.
Background
Council’s investments are reported monthly to Council in accordance with the Local Government Act 1993, the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 and Council’s Investment Policy.
Comments
Investment Portfolio Performance Snapshot
The table below provides the investments portfolio performance against targets identified in Council’s Investment Policy as well as other key performance indicators based on industry benchmarks.
Cumulative Investment Returns against Revised Budget
The net return on investments for the financial year to June 2015 was $3,898,000 against a revised budget of $3,699,000, giving an annual favourable variance of $199,000. The total return on investments (interest and net capital gain) for the month of June is provided below.
A comparison of the cumulative investment returns against year to date original budget is shown in the Chart below.
Cash Flow and Investment Movements
Council’s total cash and investment portfolio at the end of June 2015 was $97,404,000.
The net cash outflow for the month was $12,580,000. This was mainly due to debt repayments and end of financial year creditor payments.
One investment has matured and three new investments were made during the month.
Table 1 below provides detailed movements of the investment by institution name, investment rating and interest rate.
Table 1 – Investment Movements – June 2015
Investment Performance against Industry Benchmarks
Overall during the month of June the investments performance was well above industry benchmark. The benchmark is specific to the type of investment and details are provided below.
Ø UBS Bank Bill Index is used for all Council’s investments
A comparison of the portfolio returns against investment benchmark is provided in Table 2 below.
Table 2 - Investments Performance against Industry Benchmarks
Table 3 below provides a summary of all investments by type and performance during the month.
Attachment A1 provides definitions in relation to different types of investments.
Table 3 - Investments Portfolio Summary during June 2015
Investment by Credit rating and Maturity Profile
The allocation of Council’s investments by credit rating and the maturity profile are shown below:
integrated planning and reporting
Leadership & Governance
Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective |
Delivery Program Term Achievement |
Operational Plan Task |
L2.1 Council rigorously manages its financial resources and assets to maximise delivery of services |
Council maintains and improves its long term financial position and performance. |
Continue to analyse opportunities to expand the revenue base of Council |
Governance Matters
Council’s investments are made in accordance with the Local Government Act (1993), the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 and Council’s Investment Policy.
A revised Investment Policy was adopted by Council on 10 December 2013.
Section 212 of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 states:
(1) The responsible accounting officer of a council:
(a) must provide the council with a written report (setting out details of all money that the council has invested under section 625 of the Act) to be presented:
(i) if only one ordinary meeting of the council is held in a month, at that meeting, or
(ii) if more than one such meeting is held in a month, at whichever of those meetings the council by resolution determines, and
(b) must include in the report a certificate as to whether or not the investment has been made in accordance with the Act, the regulations and the council’s investment policies.
(2) The report must be made up to the last day of the month immediately preceding the meeting.
Risk Management
Council manages the risk associated with investments by diversifying the types of investment, credit quality, counterparty exposure and term to maturity profile.
Council invests its funds in accordance with The Ministerial Investment Order.
All investments are made with consideration of advice from Council’s appointed investment advisor, CPG Research & Advisory.
Council has one “Grandfathered” investment in structured products that was previously entered into in accordance with The Ministerial Investment Order at the time. The Ministerial Investment Order no longer allows investment in this product. This investment is:
CPDO PP – Royal Bank of Scotland
This Constant Proportion Debt Obligations Principal Protected (CPDO PP), with a face value of $6,000,000, is invested by Council on a “held to maturity” basis being September 2016. This CPDO is capital protected at maturity date by Royal Bank of Scotland. Since December 2011 it ceased to pay interest, due to a decrease in the credit indices it was linked to, creating an unwind event. The investment now takes the form of a zero coupon senior bank bond with a value of $6M. While Council intends to hold this investment to maturity, the market value at 30 June 2015 was quoted by RBS Morgan at $5,740,000.
Financial Considerations
The revised budget for interest on investments for the financial year 2014/2015 is $3,699,100. Of this amount approximately $2,517,100 is restricted for the benefit of future expenditure relating to development contributions, $717,700 transferred to the internally restricted Infrastructure & Facility Reserve, and the remainder of $464,300 is available for operations.
Social Considerations
Not applicable.
Environmental Considerations
Not applicable.
Community Consultation
None undertaken or required.
Internal Consultation
None undertaken or required.
Certification - Responsible Accounting Officer
I hereby certify that the investments listed in the attached report have been made in accordance with Section 625 of the Local Government Act 1993, clause 212 of the Local Government General Regulation 2005 and Council’s Investment Policy.
Summary
As at 30 June 2015:
· Council’s total cash and investment portfolio is $97,404,000.
· Council’s net return on investments for the financial year to June 2015 was $3,898,000 against a revised budget of $3,699,000, giving an annual favourable variance of $199,000.
A. That the summary of investments and performance for June 2015 be received and noted.
B. That the Certificate of the Responsible Accounting Officer be noted and the report adopted.
|
Tony Ly Financial Accounting Officer |
Angela Apostol Manager Finance |
David Marshall Director Corporate |
|
A1View |
Investments definitions specific to Council’s investment portfolio |
|
2015/017138 |
Ordinary Meeting of Council - 28 July 2015 |
GB.4 / 97 |
|
|
Item GB.4 |
S02046/8 |
|
8 July 2015 |
Local Government NSW Annual Conference 2015
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
purpose of report: |
To advise Councillors that the Local Government NSW Annual Conference will be held from 11 – 13 October 2015 at Rosehill Gardens Racecourse (James Ruse Drive Rosehill) |
|
|
background: |
The Conference is the annual policy-making event for the 152 councils of NSW. The Conference is the pre-eminent event of the local government year where local councillors come together to share ideas and debate issues that shape the way we are governed. Local Government NSW would now like to receive input from Councils to guide the content of the business sessions. Councils are requested to identify the most important issues which they believe are causing concern to the Council and/or the community and provide these details to them prior to Monday, 24 August 2015. |
|
|
comments: |
A draft program has been developed for the Conference and is attached for information. |
|
|
recommendation: |
The Councillors advise the General Manager by Friday, 31 July 2015, identifying any issues including appropriate solutions that they would like to see raised for discussion at the 2015 Conference and that a further report be brought back to the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Tuesday, 11 August 2015 for Council’s consideration, prior to the referral to Local Government NSW by the deadline. |
Purpose of Report
To advise Councillors that the Local Government NSW Annual Conference will be held from 11 – 13 October 2015 at Rosehill Gardens Racecourse (James Ruse Drive Rosehill)
Background
The Conference is the annual policy-making event for the 152 councils of NSW. The conference is the pre-eminent event of the local government year where local councillors come together to share ideas and debate issues that shape the way we are governed.
Local Government NSW would now like to receive input from Councils to guide the content of the business sessions. Councils are requested to identify the most important issues which they believe are causing concern to the Council and/or the community and provide these details to the Association prior to Monday, 24 August 2015.
Councils should identify issues or motions relating to the following overall categories – namely:
Industrial relations and employment; economic; environmental; governance/civic leadership; and, social policy.
Comments
A draft program has been developed for the conference and is attached for information [see Attachment A1].
integrated planning and reporting
Leadership and Governance
Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective |
Delivery Program Term Achievement |
Operational Plan Task |
Council leads the community by advocating, influencing and participating in policy development to the benefit of the local area.
|
Council actively engages with stakeholders to inform the development of Council’s strategies and plans as appropriate.
|
Pursue opportunities to contribute to policy development affecting Ku-ring-gai at state and regional levels.
|
Governance Matters
There are no governance considerations associated with the recommendations in this report
Risk Management
There are no financial considerations associated with the recommendation in this report.
Financial Considerations
There are no financial considerations with the recommendation in this report.
Social Considerations
There are no social considerations associated with the recommendation in this report.
Environmental Considerations
There are no environmental considerations associated with the recommendation in this report.
Community Consultation
None required or undertaken.
Internal Consultation
None required or undertaken.
Summary
Local Government NSW would now like to receive input from Councils to guide the content of the business sessions. Councils are requested to identify the most important issues which they believe are causing concern to the Council and/or the community and provide these details to Local Government NSW prior to Monday, 24 August 2015.
Councils should identify issues or motions relating to the following overall categories – namely:
Industrial relations and employment; economic; environmental; governance/civic leadership; and, social policy.
A. That Councillors advise the General Manager by Friday, 31 July 2015 of identified issues, including appropriate solutions, that they would like to see raised for discussion at the 2015 Conference.
B. That a further report be brought back to the Ordinary Meeting of Council to be held on Tuesday, 11 August 2015 for Council’s consideration, prior to the referral to Local Government NSW by the deadline.
|
Christine Dunand Governance Officer |
Matt Ryan Manager Records & Governance |
David Marshall Director Corporate |
|
A1View |
Draft Program Local Government NSW Annual Conference 2015 |
|
2015/179525 |
Ordinary Meeting of Council - 28 July 2015 |
GB.5 / 103 |
|
|
Item GB.5 |
S03662 |
|
17 July 2015 |
Setting the Date for the Election of Mayor and Deputy Mayor - 2015/2016
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
purpose of report: |
To give consideration to setting the date for the 2015/2016 election of the Mayor and Deputy Mayor. |
|
|
background: |
Section 290 of the Local Government Act 1993 provides that the election of the Mayor by the Councillors is to be held during the month of September.
Section 231 of the Act empowers the Council to elect a Deputy Mayor. |
|
|
comments: |
Council is required to determine the meeting in September each year at which the election of the Mayor and Deputy Mayor is to be held. |
|
|
recommendation: |
That the 2015/2016 election of the Mayor and Deputy Mayor be held at the Ordinary meeting of Council on Tuesday, 15 September 2015 |
Purpose of Report
To give consideration to setting the date for the 2015/2016 election of the Mayor and Deputy Mayor.
Background
Section 290 of the Local Government Act 1993 provides that the election of the Mayor by the Councillors is to be held during the month of September.
Section 231 of the Act empowers the Council to elect a Deputy Mayor.
Also Council’s Code of Meeting Practice (Clause 3.28 – Annual Elections) states:
That council determine the meeting in September each year at which the election for Mayor, Deputy Mayor, Committee members and delegates is to be held.
Comments
The recommended date to hold the Mayoral/Deputy Mayoral elections is Tuesday, 15 September 2015.
The Local Government Act 1993 and Council’s code of Meeting Practice provide for the Mayoral Election to be held in September each year, with the date to be determined by Council.
The election of the Mayor and Deputy Mayor in 2014 was held on 16 September 2014. If the forthcoming Mayoral election is held at the Ordinary meeting of Council to be held on 15 September 2015, the current mayoral term will have been as close as possible to 12 months.
integrated planning and reporting
Leadership and Governance
Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective |
Delivery Program Term Achievement |
Operational Plan Task |
The organisation is recognised and distinguished by its ethical decision making, efficient management, innovation and quality customer service.
|
Council’s governance framework is developed to ensure probity, transparency and the principles of sustainability are integrated and applied into our policies, plans, guidelines and decision making processes.
|
Comply with the requirements of the Local Government Act and Regulations.
|
Governance Matters
Section 290(1)(b) of the Local Government Act 1993 provides that the election of the Mayor by the Councillors is to be held during the month of September.
Section 230(3)(b) of the Local Government Act 1993 provides that the position of Mayor becomes vacant when the person’s successor is declared to be elected to the office, or on the occurrence of a casual vacancy in the office.
Section 231 of the Act empowers the Council to elect a Deputy Mayor.
Also, Council’s Code of Meeting Practice (Clause 3.28 – Annual Elections) states:
That council determine the meeting in September each year at which the election for Mayor, Deputy Mayor, Committee members and delegates is to be held.
Risk Management
The main risk associated with this report is that if a date for the Mayor election is not held within September 2015, Council may be in breach of its compliance obligations under the Local Government Act 1993.
Financial Considerations
There are no financial considerations associated with the recommendation in this report.
Social Considerations
There are no social considerations associated with the recommendation in this report.
Environmental Considerations
There are no environmental considerations associated with the recommendation in this report.
Community Consultation
None undertaken or required.
Internal Consultation
None undertaken or required.
Summary
The recommended date to hold the Mayoral/Deputy Mayoral elections is Tuesday, 15 September 2015.
The Local Government Act 1993 and Council’s Code of Meeting Practice provide for the Mayoral election to be held in September each year, with the date to be determined by Council.
The election of the Mayor and Deputy Mayor in 2014 was held on 16 September 2014. If the forthcoming Mayoral election is held at the Ordinary meeting of Council to be held on 15 September 2015, the current mayoral term will have been as close as possible to 12 months.
That the 2015/2016 election of Mayor and Deputy Mayor be held at the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Tuesday, 15 September 2015.
|
Christine Dunand Governance Officer |
Matt Ryan Manager Records & Governance |
David Marshall Director Corporate |
|
Ordinary Meeting of Council - 28 July 2015 |
GB.6 / 107 |
|
|
Item GB.6 |
S10355 |
|
16 July 2015 |
Tender T8-2015 - Howson oval Sportsfield Upgrade (Design and Construct)
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
purpose of report: |
To consider the tenders received for the Howson Oval Sportsfield Upgrade (Design and Construct), Howson Avenue, South Turramurra and appoint the preferred tenderer. |
|
|
background: |
Council, as part of the Open Space Capital Works Program, approved funding for the rebuild of Howson Oval, South Turramurra, including the addition of sports field drainage, irrigation, new synthetic cricket wicket and upgrade to the sportsfield surface. Tender documents were prepared and released through Tenderlink on 10 March 2015 with a closing date of 7 April 2015 |
|
|
comments: |
Tender documents were produced with four (4) submissions received. The submissions were assessed using agreed criteria which identified the best value to Council. |
|
|
recommendation: |
In accordance with Section 55 of the Local Government Act and Tender Regulations, and following the request for tender, it is recommended that Council accepts the tender submitted by tender ‘A’. |
Purpose of Report
To consider the tenders received for the Howson Oval Sportsfield Upgrade (Design and Construct), Howson Avenue, South Turramurra and appoint the preferred tenderer.
Background
Council, as part of the Open Space Capital Works Program, approved funding for the rebuild of Howson Oval, South Turramurra, including the addition of sportsfield drainage, irrigation, new synthetic cricket wicket and upgrade to the sportsfield surface. Tender documents were prepared and released through Tenderlink on 10 March 2015 with a closing date of 7 April 2015.
As the estimated cost of the rebuild works is over $150,000, Tenders were called using Tenderlink in accordance with the tender requirements of the Local Government Act and Regulation.
Comments
Four (4) tenders were received and recorded in accordance with Council’s tendering policy. Tenders were received from the following companies:
Ceecorp Pty Ltd
Design Landscapes Pty Ltd
Hargreaves Urban Pty Ltd
Never Stop Irrigation Pty Ltd
It should be noted the order above does not correspond to the order of the list of tenderers named from ‘A’ to ‘D’ in the confidential attachment. A Tender Evaluation Panel consisting of staff from the different sections of the Operations Department was formed to assess the four (4) tenders received. The evaluation took into account:
· Conformity of submission
· lump sum fee,
· company and staff experience,
· ability to provide the full range of services required,
· work program, construction methodology and availability,
· previous performance in relation to similar type work, and
· risk management
Confidential attachments to this report include:
· List of tenders received and additional financial information (Attachment 1).
· Tender Evaluation Panel’s comments and recommendation (Attachment 2).
· Corporate Scorecard Report – Tenderer ‘A’ – Financial and Performance Assessment (Attachment 3).
integrated planning and reporting
Enhance Recreation, Sporting and Leisure Facilities.
Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective |
Delivery Program Term Achievement |
Operational Plan Task |
P6.1 Recreation, sporting and leisure facilities are available to meet the community’s diverse and changing needs.
|
A program is being implemented to improve existing recreational, sporting and leisure facilities and facilitate the establishment of new facilities. |
Deliver park asset refurbishment program at priority locations.
|
Governance Matters
Tender documents were prepared and released through Tenderlink on 10 March 2015 with a closing date of 7 April 2015.
At the close of tender, four (4) tenders were received.
All submissions were recorded in accordance with Council’s tendering policy. A Tender Evaluation Panel consisting of staff from the different sections of the Operations Department was formed to assess the four (4) tenders received. The evaluation took into account:
· Conformity of submission
· lump sum fee,
· company and staff experience,
· ability to provide the full range of services required,
· work program, construction methodology and availability,
· previous performance in relation to similar type work, and
· risk management
Confidential attachments to this report include the list of tenders received, the Tender Evaluation Panel’s comments and recommendation. The attachments are considered to be confidential in accordance with Section 10A (2)(d)(iii) of The Local Government Act 1993 as they are considered to contain commercial in confidence information.
Risk Management
Three (3) key areas of risk were identified in relation to the proposed work:
1. That work needed to be carried out by a suitably qualified company with experience of sport field design and construction.
2. Availability – the company was available to commence work within a few weeks of the work being awarded and has the resources to complete the work quickly and efficiently and without major delays.
3. That Council should not be exposed to financial risk. As part of the evaluation process an independent Performance and Financial Assessment was carried out by Corporate Scorecard Pty Ltd, the tenderer assessed as providing the best value and quality to Council was Tenderer ‘A’.
As part of the independent Performance and Financial Assessment the following areas were examined:
· That Tenderer ‘A’ has the financial capacity to undertake the proposed value of work;
· That Tenderer ‘A’ has been trading in a profitable and responsible manner during the last three (3) years; and
· That Tenderer ‘A’ has sufficient assets/reserves to cover all possible debts during the period of work.
The financial aspect of the independent assessment shows Tenderer ‘A’ is able to satisfy all requirements and is unlikely to expose Council to financial risk if awarded the tender as detailed within Council’s tender documents.
Financial Considerations
This project was listed in Council’s 2014/15 Delivery Program and Operational Plan with an amount of $430,000 was allocated for the works. The list of funding available for the works is detailed in Attachment 1.
In accordance with statutory obligations, at the finalisation of the project, all unspent funds will be returned to appropriate plan.
Social Considerations
Howson Oval is a well utilised sports oval. The present sportsfield is well used by sporting groups and with the growing numbers of sporting users will be placed under increased demand and use.
The proposed site works which includes drainage, irrigation and regrading, will enhance the recreational value of the site allowing greater access for sporting clubs and casual users. In particular, the improved drainage will allow increased access to the site during the wetter months.
The proposed upgrade of the present sportsfield will enhance the recreational and sports value of the site and provide greater access for sports clubs and casual users.
The proposed works is also in line with Council’s Community Strategic Plan 2030 and the Plan’s long term directions including the objective to have a community embrace healthier lifestyle choices and practices; and to provide quality open space, community and recreational facilities to meet the needs of our changing community.
Environmental Considerations
Prior to tender, the project was subject to a Potential Environmental Impact Assessment which determined the impact on the environment by the works is minor. This will be re-assessed once the final design has been agreed.
Community Consultation
User groups, clubs and local residents will be advised of the start and estimated completion date of the works once this is known.
It is envisaged there will be minimal disruption to local residents during the construction period. Users of the site are already aware of the pending works and alternative facilities will be made available during the construction phase of the works.
Internal Consultation
Consultation was undertaken by officers from Operations Department, with staff from the Operations and Community Departments also being consulted.
Summary
Council, as part of the 2014/2015 Open Space Capital Works Program, approved funding for the upgrade of Howson Oval, Howson Avenue, South Turramurra NSW 2074, including improved drainage, irrigation and resurfacing works.
Following internal and community consultation, tender documentation was produced with Tenders being called on 10 March 2015 with a closing date of 7 April 2015.
A Tender Evaluation Panel was formed consisting of representatives from different sections of the Operations Department. At the close of tender, four (4) tenders were received and recorded in accordance with Council’s tendering policy.
Following the evaluation and independent performance and financial check, it is recommended Tenderer ‘A’ be appointed on the basis of providing the best value to Council.
A. That Council accept the tender submission from Tenderer ‘A’ to carry out the upgrade of Howson Oval, Howson Avenue, South Turramurra NSW 2074.
B. That Council approve the balance of funds required to be transferred from Section 94 funds to the project.
C. That the Mayor and General Manager be delegated authority to execute all tender documents on Council’s behalf in relation to the contract.
D. That the Seal of Council be affixed to all necessary documents.
E. That all tenderers be advised of Councils decision in accordance with Clause 178 of the Local Government Act and Tender Regulation.
|
David Morris Manager Projects |
Greg Piconi Director Operations |
List of Tenders received, financial considerations and Tender Evaluation Panel's comments |
|
Confidential |
||
|
Tender Evaluation Panel's Score and recommendation |
|
Confidential |
|
|
Corporate Scorecard Report - Tenderer 'A' - Financial and Performance Assessment |
|
Confidential |
Ordinary Meeting of Council - 28 July 2015 |
GB.7 / 112 |
|
|
Item GB.7 |
S10468 |
|
16 June 2015 |
259-271 Pacific Highway, Lindfield (Lindfield Library Site) - project update
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
purpose of report: |
To update Council on the progress of planning for the site and the land reclassification process and present a recommendation for a preferred option for the potential redevelopment of the existing Lindfield library precinct at 259-271 Pacific Highway, Lindfield.
|
|
|
background: |
At the Ordinary Meeting of Council on 11 November 2014 Council resolved to commence the reclassification process for Council land at 259-271 Pacific Highway, Lindfield, also known as the ‘Lindfield library precinct’, from Community to Operational land. At the same meeting Council resolved to prepare built form options for their approval prior to placing it on public exhibition. |
|
|
comments: |
Consultants have been engaged to prepare a number of studies to further the planning for the site, including: · urban design / architectural consultants to prepare built form options; · heritage consultants to undertake an Historical Archaeological Assessment (HAA); · land economists to advise on market demand and financial feasibility; and · geo-technical and land contamination specialists to advise on any potential sub-surface limitations of the site. The results of these studies and others are summarised in this report. |
|
|
recommendation: |
That Council adopts built form Option 2 and proceed to prepare an illustrated concept design of Option 2 for public exhibition.
|
Purpose of Report
To update Council on the progress of planning for the site and the land reclassification process and present a recommendation for a preferred option for the potential redevelopment of the existing Lindfield library precinct at 259-271 Pacific Highway, Lindfield.
Background
At the Ordinary Meeting of Council on 11 November 2014 Council considered the reclassification of Council land at 259-271 Pacific Highway, Lindfield, also known as the ‘Lindfield library precinct’, from Community to Operational land. At that meeting Council resolved:
A. That a Planning Proposal be prepared, in accordance with section 55 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979, to reclassify lot 8 DP 660564 and lots 1, 2 and 3 DP 212617, known as 259-271 Pacific Highway, Lindfield from Community land to Operational land; and to increase the maximum FSR from 1.3:1 to 2.0:1 via an amendment to the Ku-ring-gai Local Centres LEP, 2012.
B. That Council formally seek to discharge all interests for lot 8 DP 660564 and lots 1, 2 and 3 DP 212617, known as 259-271 Pacific Highway, Lindfield.
C. That the Planning Proposal by submitted to the Department of Planning and Environment for a Gateway Determination in accordance with Section 56 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979.
D. That upon receipt of a Gateway Determination, the exhibition and consultation process is carried out in accordance with the requirements of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979 and with the Gateway Determination requirements.
E. That Council undertake a public hearing under the provisions of the Local Government Act, 1993 for the proposed reclassification of lot 8 DP 660564 and lots 1, 2 and 3 DP 212617, known as 259-271 Pacific Highway, Lindfield from Community land to Operational land.
F. That a report be brought back to Council at the end of the exhibition and public hearing processes.
G. That Council relocate the Ku-ring-gai Youth Development Service (KYDS) service within the proposed Lindfield community hub (upon completion of the facility) and that the new facility provide purpose-built rooms to be designed in consultation with representatives of KYDS to meet their specific requirements.
H. That a concept design with an FSR of up to 2.0:1 and a building height of 5 storeys be prepared and reported to Council for their approval prior to placing it on public exhibition in conjunction with the consultation and public hearing processes for reclassification.
I. That a further report to Council is prepared considering the funds required, and the associated risks and advantages for Council if it was to prepare a development application for the site. Such further report to Council to include an investigation of potential for active uses on the Woodford Lane or Library precinct site.
J. That no significant development take place on the site nor any removal of existing tenants, until construction of the Lindfield Community Hub has commenced.
This report will update Council on the progress of Resolutions A-E and in particular H and I.
Comments
Consultants have been engaged to prepare, on behalf of Council, a number of studies to further the planning for the site, including:
· urban design / architectural consultants to prepare built form options;
· heritage consultants to undertake an Historical Archaeological Assessment (HAA); and
· land economists to advise on market demand and financial feasibility.
The results of these studies and others are summarised in this report.
A. Site Description
The Lindfield library precinct is legally described as lot 8 in DP 660564 and lots 1, 2 and 3 in DP 212617 (refer Figure 1); it has a total land area of approximately 5,848.6m² and is the address for a number of Council services and facilities including:
· Lindfield Branch Library (lot 8 in DP 660564);
· former Arrunga Aged Care Self-Contained Units (now vacated) (lot 3 in DP 212617);
· former Lindfield Seniors’ Centre (lot 2 in DP 212617);
· former Lindfield Seniors’ Resource Centre (lot 8 in DP 660564);
· Ku-ring-gai Youth Development Service (KYDS) (lot 8 in DP 660564);
· Lindfield Community Centre tennis courts and sun shelter (lot 8 in DP 660564); and
· car park and access road (lot 1 in DP 212617).
Other elements on the site are:
· toilet facilities;
· landscaped areas; and
· a former well (subject to investigation).
Figure 1 – Lindfield library precinct - 259–271 Pacific Highway, Lindfield
Figure 2 – Lindfield library precinct showing layout of facilities
B. Existing Facilities and Services
The Lindfield Community Facilities Study (Elton Consulting, 2013) recommended that the existing library and Seniors’ Centre facilities be replaced with new facilities co-located in a community hub situated on the western side of Lindfield with a total area of over 2,455m2. This recommendation is based on the fact that the current Lindfield Library and associated facilities are old, outdated, no longer fit-for-purpose and not suitable for long term adaptation and re-use due to their condition. The existing buildings are not appropriate or capable of meeting the needs of the future population. It is proposed to relocate KYDS Youth Development Service to new purpose built facilities within the proposed Lindfield Community Hub. Similarly, the tennis courts have very low usage levels. There is more than an adequate supply of such facilities within close proximity to the site.
At the Ordinary Meeting of Council on 10 December 2013 Council resolved to locate the proposed new Lindfield branch library and new community centre to the western side of Lindfield local centre on land owned by council on Woodford Lane, Lindfield in accordance with the recommendations made by Elton Consulting in the Lindfield Community Facilities Study, December 2013, known as the Lindfield Community Hub site.
C. Planning Context
The Lindfield library precinct is currently zoned B2 - Local Centre under the Ku-ring-gai Local Centres LEP 2012 (KLEP 2012) with a maximum building height of 17.5 metres (5 storeys) and a maximum floor space ratio (FSR) of 1.3:1. The Lindfield library precinct is classified as community land under the Local Government Act, 1993. The process to reclassify Council land has commenced - to reclassify the site from Community land to Operational land and to increase the maximum FSR from 1.3:1 to 2.0:1 via an amendment to the Ku-ring-gai Local Centres LEP 2012 (KLEP 2012). The proposed Planning Proposal is currently with the Department of Planning for consideration. A decision is expected in late August 2015.
The KLEP 2012 shows an absence of heritage items, areas of biodiversity or riparian lands on the subject site.
The site is located in the Lindfield Local Centre. The Ku-ring-gai (Local Centres) DCP 2012 Volume B guides the qualitative design response to the site, both in relation to the particular characteristics of Lindfield as a centre and the building typologies considered appropriate.
The subject site is subject to the relevant requirements of the Ku-ring-gai (Local Centres) DCP 2012 contained in Volume A, Part 7 – Residential Flat Buildings and Part 8 – Mixed Use Development. Additionally, the site is subject to the controls under Volume B, Part 8 – Development near Railways and Busy Roads, which identifies particular setback controls to respond to noise constraints in these areas.
With reference to the local centre suite of planning documents, including the Town Centres Public Domain Plan, 2010; Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan, 2010 and Local Centres DCP, 2013 the subject site has not been identified as a strategically important site for the delivery of future public community infrastructure.
D. Background Studies
To date, Council has engaged specialist consultants to carry out initial investigations into the site’s conditions and constraints. A preliminary contamination assessment is required to be included with the planning proposal submission.
SLR Consulting have been engaged by Ku-ring-gai Council to prepare a Stage 1 – Preliminary Site Investigation report. Based on a review of the available desktop search data and observations made during the site walkover, the consultant makes the following conclusions and recommendations:
· there is a moderate likelihood of unacceptable contamination to be present on the site, as result of past and present land use activities;
· further assessment would be required to assess the suitability of the site for future land uses. The further assessment would likely require intrusive soil sampling using a targeted sampling point approach to address the identified areas of environmental concern;
· likely future land use options should be identified prior to undertaking further assessment works, to enable appropriate human and environmental health exposure scenarios to be considered during those assessment works; and
· further contamination assessment work should be undertaken by a suitably experienced environmental consultant.
Traffic consultants, Peopletrans, prepared the Lindfield Transport Network Study 2014. Among the recommendations of this study, is an extension of Tryon Lane through to the subject site, to connect with the Pacific Highway. This will enable enhanced circulation for kiss-and-ride associated with Lindfield train station.
Other completed studies that are relevant to this project include:
· a Plan of Management (December 2014);
· a land valuation (November 2014);
· Lindfield Community Hub – preliminary feasibility modelling by Jones Lang LaSalle, 2014; and
· Lindfield Community Facilities Study prepared by Elton Consulting, December 2013.
E. Development Options
In response to resolutions from the Ordinary Meeting of Council 11 November 2014 SJB Urban (SJB) have been engaged to prepare three (3) built form options for the Lindfield library precinct, situated at 259-271 Pacific Highway, Lindfield. The consultants have engaged a rigorous process of site and context analysis, identified opportunities and constraints, devised bespoke design principles to inform the preparation of the various options. Options for different uses, including market housing, affordable housing, commercial uses, co-working spaces and childcare facilities have been explored in the three (3) options. A summary of the findings is set out below and the full study prepared by SJB Urban can be found in Attachment 1.
In preparing the three built form options, SJB have considered the context of the site to the north of the library precinct, at 283 Pacific Highway and how its potential future development may link closely in relation to the proposed built form outcomes, open space configuration and new street connections through the site. The options integrate the adjoining site into proposals to provide a holistic approach to the development of the southern end of the Lindfield Local Centre.
The aforementioned design principles form the fundamentals for the each of the following three (3) options. Similarly, the existing site conditions, opportunities and constraints have determined the optimal location and orientation of the proposed built form.
E.1 Site Analysis
The library precinct sits within the Lindfield Local Centre. The site is bound by the Pacific Highway to the west, the North Shore rail line to the east, existing commercial development to the north and existing residential apartments to the south. The site is considered to have good exposure and aspect and proximity to the Pacific Highway (albeit one egress/ingress point), is situated 400 metres from Lindfield Station and is within the vicinity of the proposed Lindfield Community Hub and Lindfield Village Green.
Topographically, the site is situated at street level with a significant fall from the Pacific Highway towards the rear boundary. There are numerous trees onsite, the largest of which are characteristic of the site’s boundaries, with particularly dense/established foliage typical of the northern boundary interfacing with the Volvo car dealership at 283 Pacific Highway. Note – a detailed arboriculture assessment has not as yet been undertaken for the site.
The library precinct is characterised by five buildings of varying architectural styles ranging from the 1950s to 1970s, a carpark and two tennis courts, surrounded by lawns and gardens.
A number of constraints and opportunities have been identified:
Constraints
· traffic noise generated from the Pacific Highway;
· existing extant well situated in front of the library building;
· limited access from the Pacific Highway;
· existing trees on the site;
· setback control of 6 metres from the Ku-ring-gai Council DCP;
· adjoining residential buildings with habitable rooms and balconies facing north towards the site;
· rail noise generated by the rail line to the east; and
· existing building abutting northern boundary.
Opportunities
· Strengthen the existing street edge and frontage to the Pacific Highway;
· new street connecting the Pacific Highway with Tryon Place;
· active frontages at the rear, interfacing with Tryon Place;
· existing trees on the site create a buffer between subject site and the adjoining sites, rail corridor and residential flat buildings;
· stepped built form to respond to the site’s topography; and
· potential future development of the adjoining site to the north (283 Pacific Highway).
E.2 Design Principles
Based on a contextual site analysis, the following design principles provide the basis for the evolution of the three (3) built form options prepared by SJB:
· connectivity;
· liveability;
· culture & place;
· community;
· activation & accessibility;
· integration with the Lindfield local centre; and
· amenity.
E.3 Built Form Option 1
The key characteristics of Option 1 are as follows:
· this option is based on an FSR of 1.75:1, building heights between 5 - 6 storeys, generating 94 dwellings (units) and 163 car parking spaces;
· a through-site connection is proposed on the southern portion of the site - improving both pedestrian and vehicular connectivity from Tryon Place through to the Pacific Highway, whilst creating two viable development parcels;
· a useable area of open space is centrally located and contained by the proposed built form to the north, east and west;
· ground floor commercial uses fronting the Pacific Highway and Tryon Place will activate these street edges. This is especially important for the Tryon Place frontage, as it will form an important new link to the site from the rail station. Given its interface with the rail line, façade activation is essential to enlivening this ‘back of house’ space;
· proposed built form directly abuts the adjoining property (283 Pacific Highway);
· a range of building lengths and depths have been proposed across the site, which achieve the desired urban, amenity and development outcomes – allowing for a moderated building bulk and scale along the Pacific Highway frontage (block A2), maximising residential amenity and outlook throughout the site [particularly the northerly aspect of block A3], with building setbacks that respond to both the existing residential grain and commercial character of the Centre (blocks A2 & A3), whilst allowing for deep soil planting and unencumbered vehicular access/movement to the proposed basement car parking, as demonstrated in the massing diagrams – refer Figure 3;
· orientation of the blocks in this option engender an activated street edge along the entirety of the new through-site link (particularly blocks A1 & A2), using both commercial and residential uses to achieve this, encouraging continued activity and pedestrian movement through this shared zone;
· this option would require a minor LEP amendment (Schedule 1) to allow apartment buildings. No childcare centre is proposed in this option; and
· Option 1 has the lowest projected financial return of the three options presented in this report. The full financial analysis report prepared by Jones Lang LaSalle is in Confidential Attachment A2.
Figure 3 – Master Plan Option 1
Figure 4 – Illustrative Plan Option 1
Figure 5 – Option 1 Massing
Figure 6 – Option 1 Massing
Figure 7 – Option 1 Section
E.4 Built Form Option 2
The key characteristics of Option 2 are as follows:
· this option is based on an FSR of 1.75:1, a range of building heights between 4-6 storeys, generating 106 dwellings (units) and 150 car parks;
· in this option the through-site connection aligns with the subject site’s northern boundary, removing the constraints associated with building interfaces along the Pacific Highway and Tryon Place frontages. Locating a road on a boundary rationalises basements (i.e single basement/single entry point) in turn creating a better developable site area overall;
· similar to that of Option 1, a range of building lengths and depths have been proposed however the orientation of the blocks differs, adopting a more contiguous form and stepped profile in response to the site’s topography. In contrast to Option 1, a majority of the proposed apartments are orientated towards the Pacific Highway or rail line, taking advantage of district views at the upper levels, with lower level apartments overlooking the internal amenity space. Refer Figures 10 and 11 – Option 2 Massing;
· proposed building setbacks respond to both the existing residential grain and commercial character of the centre (block a3);
· the open space is apportioned into two key areas - a public space that flanks the through-site connection and a private amenity space (potentially with deep soil) situated on the southern portion of the site, corralled by the development;
· ground floor commercial uses are focused at the northern edge of the subject site, interfacing with Tryon Place, the new through-site link and overlooking the public open space;
· integration with the town centre’s character is focused at the northern extent of the Pacific Highway frontage;
· deep soil landscape setbacks are provided along both the eastern and southern boundaries;
· this option would require amending the existing planning proposal to an R4 (High Density Residential) Zone and a height amendment to allow a maximum building height of 6 storeys (20.5 metres). This option includes a child care centre.
· Option 2 has the median projected financial return of the three options presented in this report. The full financial analysis report prepared by Jones Lang LaSalle is in Confidential Attachment A2.
Figure 8 – Master Plan Option 2 and 3
Figure 9 – Illustrative Plan Option 2
Figure 10 – Option 2 Massing
Figure 11 – Option 2 Massing
Figure 12 – Section
E.5 Built Form Option 3
The key characteristics of Option 3 are as follows:
· this option is based on an FSR of 2.0:1, a mix of building heights ranging from 4-7 storeys, generating 121 dwellings (units) and 171 car parks;
· the through-site connection aligns with the subject site’s northern boundary (as it does in Option 2), removing the constraints associated with building interfaces along the Pacific Highway and Tryon Place frontages. Locating a road on a boundary rationalises basements (i.e single basement/single entry point) in turn creating a better developable site area overall;
· similar to that of Option 2, a range of building lengths and depths have been proposed however the orientation of the blocks differs, adopting a more contiguous form and stepped profile in response to the site’s topography. In contrast to Option 1, a majority of the proposed apartments are orientated towards the Pacific Highway or rail line, taking advantage of district views at the upper levels, with lower level apartments overlooking the internal amenity space. Refer Figures 14 and 15 – Massing Option 2;
· proposed building setbacks respond to both the existing residential grain and commercial character of the Lindfield local centre (block A3);
· the open space is apportioned into two key areas - a public space that flanks the through-site connection and a private amenity space (potentially with deep soil) situated on the southern portion of the site, corralled by the development;
· ground floor commercial uses are focused at the northern edge of the subject site, interfacing with Tryon Lane and the through-site link and overlooking the public open space;
· integration with the town centre’s character is focused at the northern extent of the Pacific Highway frontage;
· deep soil landscape setbacks are provided along both the eastern and southern boundaries;
· this option would require amending the planning proposal to an R4 (High Density Residential) Zone and a height amendment to allow a maximum building height of 7 storeys (23.5 metres). This option includes a child care centre.
· Option 3 has the highest projected financial return of the three options presented in this report. The full financial analysis report prepared by Jones Lang LaSalle is in Confidential Attachment C2.
Figure 13 – Illustrative Plan Option 2
Figure 14 – Option 2 Massing
Figure 15 – Option 2 Massing
Figure 16 – Section
F. Financial Feasibility Analysis
JLL have prepared a feasibility study for the Lindfield Library Precinct at 259-271 Pacific Highway, Lindfield, the full report is in Confidential Attachment A2. Specific deliverables provided within the report include the following:
· input into the identification of opportunities and constraints of the landholdings;
· market research of a range of potential asset classes including residential, inclusive of affordable housing, office, retail and childcare uses;
· undertake a feasibility analysis; and
· recommendations on maximising value.
The site is highly accessible, situated directly to the south of the mixed use commercial strip of the eastern side of the Pacific Highway and is within 400 metres of the Lindfield Railway Station. Within the context of the local centre and surrounding uses, the site forms a key transition site with established community uses sitting between existing commercial and residential uses.
JLL has undertaken a financial analysis on the three built form options prepared by SJB. A summary of the findings is set out below.
F.1 Residential Land Use Analysis
In analysing the market conditions JLL have had regard for potential developments that may compete with the subject development. The development progress of a number of residential unit proposals, within Lindfield and suburbs immediately adjoining, such as Killara, Roseville and Gordon have been identified and summarised in the JLL report. It is noted that significant numbers of units are in the pipeline in these areas and would potentially compete with the subject project. Given the number of residential and mixed use developments within the area, any developments with a unit yield of less than 20 units has been omitted.
The market for residential development sites throughout the metropolitan area remains active, however, due to the lack of sales in the immediate area, JLL have considered broader sales evidence for comparative purposes, including a number of sites in Artarmon, Gordon, St Ives, Killara and Lane Cove North.
JLL consider demand for residential is currently very strong with the demand for completed product and development sites and that residential uses are the ‘highest and best’ use. The proposed development should therefore look to achieving the greatest potential residential yield to maximise value.
F.2 Affordable Housing
The State Environmental Planning Policy (Affordable Rental Housing) 2009 (AHSEPP) was introduced on the 31 July 2009 to increase the supply and diversity of affordable rental and social housing throughout NSW. JLL have considered the key impacts on marketability of this SEPP on the subject site to be:
· that a proportion of the development will be rented out as ‘affordable housing’;
· that the rent proportion will be so at a discount market rent, for a minimum period of ten years; and
· a requirement for specialised management.
· there is limited comparable evidence for transactions that can provide a guide to the impact on value. However, JLL’s research has identified a site at 1190 Pacific Highway, Pymble that is currently being marketed. The site is DA approved for 43 apartments on a 1,982.5sqm GFA with:
- a unit mix consisting of 11 x 2 bedrooms, 4 x 1 bedroom + study and 28 x 1 bedrooms;
- approved under the Affordable Housing SEPP for 30% of the GFA; and
- located 400 metres to Pymble train station and shopping village.
JLL’s observations suggests that there is a lack of evidence in the market, to provide definitive guidance on the demand for affordable housing, however the research undertaken by JLL indicates a significant discount to unencumbered residential product.
F.3 Non-Residential Land Uses
Based on the assessment in section 8 of the JLL report regarding childcare and commercial office uses, JLL conclude that while a small amount of non-residential land uses could be accommodated, potentially in the form of a child care centre, these should be limited due to the locational attributes of the site. It is recommended to focus retail in the core of the centre. Retail on this site would be considered a low driver because of its location on the fringe of the centre.
F.4 Feasibility Analysis of Options
JLL have compared the three (3) options prepared by SJB using a Discounted Cash Flow Model (DCF) which derives Residential Land Value (RLV). In all cases nil escalations and 100% debt financing of the development have been assumed. JLL have also analysed the site using the direct comparison model. The feasibility outcome (Residential Land Value Approach) for each option has been reviewed, together with the direct comparison approach.
The outcome of the JLL analysis is provided in Confidential Attachment A2.
JLL make the following conclusions and key observations for council’s consideration:
· residential uses are the ‘highest and best use’ of the site and should be maximised;
· affordable housing provides a far inferior financial outcome compared with unencumbered residential uses. If Council considers affordable housing JLL recommends that the affordable housing be restricted to a single building rather than having it within each building – thus allowing the potential to subdivide off the affordable housing component;
· some demand exists for non-residential uses, albeit at a materially “softer” rate than the residential land uses. The market will determine most appropriate use; however, JLL considers that a childcare use would be viable at this location; and
· JLL has seen compression in the market between the value of development approved sites and sites without development approval, the additional ~15% might be worth pursuing to maximise the value of the site, but would add significantly to Council’s timeframe for disposal.
As such JLL recommends Ku-ring-gai Council pursue the following strategies to maximise value:
· pursue development strategies which maximise the residential yield from the site, not including affordable housing. While a small amount of non-residential land uses could be accommodated, potentially in the form of a child care use, these should be limited due to the locational attributes of the site;
· pursue development approval on the site with maximum development yield; or
· offer a sale and leaseback, to provide the developer time to achieve a development approval. A timeframe of 12-18 months would be ideal to from the markets perspective.
G. Historical Archaeological Assessment
The library precinct contains an extant well which was constructed as part of the previous use of the site as a dairy farm owned by the Coleman family [late 19th Century] and is located directly in front of the existing library. The well is not listed as a heritage item. The study area is not listed on any heritage registers and does not border any heritage-listed sites or conservation areas.
Figure 17 – Location of extant well [red dot] and former shops
GML Heritage Pty Ltd (GML) has been engaged on behalf of Council to prepare a historical archaeological assessment (HAA) of the Lindfield library precinct and in particular undertake historical research to better understand the significance of the existing well and identify any necessary mitigation measures should they be required. The HAA is required to inform a concept design for the potential redevelopment of the site. The report evaluates the site’s potential to contain a historical archaeological resource and assesses its heritage significance. The report also identifies historical archaeological opportunities and constraints and provides recommendations for the management of the potential resource. The full report is available in Attachment A3.
The HAA report concludes that:
· the site has moderate to high potential to contain historical archaeological remains associated with the key phase of its late nineteenth century development associated with Thomas Coleman’s shops and small industry complex. The complex became a landmark in the district and was known to the locals for many years as Coleman’s Corner;
· the majority of the site’s potential archaeological remains have been assessed to be of significance at a local level. Relics associated with the nineteenth century convict labour used at the Clanville property for orcharding and farming are unlikely to exist onsite, but if any substantial evidence were found, it would be significant at a state or possibly national level. As such, most of the potential archaeological remains constitute relics within the meaning of the Heritage Act;
· given the local interest in the extant well and the history of the site, it is recommended that the well be left in situ and incorporated into the new design. However, if this option is not feasible due to construction restraints, removal with relocation and interpretation should be considered. It is further recommended that interpretation of the well be relocated to the associated Lindfield Community Hub site, being a more publicly accessible location;
· interpretation of the site’s archaeological resource, post excavation, should warrant the implementation of a public interpretation program (possibly in the form of interpretive signage or other suitable medium) in order to offset development impacts on the potential significant resource that may exist on site;
· in the event that unexpected historical archaeological evidence is not identified in this report but was to be encountered during the site works , works should cease and the Heritage Division, OEH, be notified immediately in accordance with Section 146 of the Heritage Act; and
· in the event that Aboriginal archaeological remains are located during the course of the proposed development or historical archaeological investigations within the subject site, work should cease immediately, and, if not already present, an archaeologist should be contacted to document and assess these finds.
Based on discussions between Council staff and GML, it has been ascertained that further investigative works will need to be undertaken on site. To be able to determine the nature and extent of the site’s archaeological potential, GML would undertake an archaeological investigation of the site prior to development in the library precinct. This investigation would include archaeological testing, recording and a report outlining the findings, with particular reference to the state of the extant well in front of the existing library building. This investigation would be carried out under the conditions of a Section 139 approval under the Heritage Act 1977.
H. Preferred Built Form Option (Option 2)
Option 2 has been assessed as the preferred for the following reasons:
· the option is based on a range of building heights between 4-6 storeys which is considered optimal for the site;
· the option provides a new public road connection along the subject site’s northern boundary, removing the constraints associated with building interfaces along the Pacific Highway and Tryon Lane frontages;
· locating the road on a boundary rationalises car parking basements which in turn creates a better developable site area overall;
· a range of building lengths and depths have been proposed which offer a more contiguous form and stepped profile in response to the site’s topography;
· a majority of the proposed apartments are orientated towards the Pacific Highway or rail line, taking advantage of district views at the upper levels, with lower level apartments overlooking the internal communal open space;
· the option provides a small public space adjoining the new road which may be a good location for site history interpretation;
· Option 2 has the median projected financial return of the three options presented in this report.
Given some of the matters raised in the risk section below, it would be quite acceptable for Council to give serious consideration to option 3.
integrated planning and reporting
Theme 3 - Places, Spaces and Infrastructure
Theme 6 – Leadership and Governance
Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective |
Delivery Program Term Achievement |
Operational Plan Task |
A range of well planned, clean and safe neighbourhoods and public spaces designed with a strong sense of identity and place. |
P4.1.1 Plans to revitalise local centres are being progressively implemented and achieve quality design outcomes in collaboration with key agencies, landholders and the community. |
- Implement a place management approach for the local centre improvements to coordinate works and achieve quality outcomes. |
|
P4.1.4 An improvement plan for Lindfield centre is being progressively implemented in collaboration with owners, businesses and state agencies. |
- Engage with relevant stakeholders to establish timing, extent and partnership opportunities. - Develop and finalise project scope. - Maintain engagement with the key stakeholders. |
Ku-ring-gai is well led, managed and supported by ethical organisations which deliver projects and services to the community by listening, advocating and responding to their needs. |
L2.1.1 Council maintains and improves its long term financial position and performance. |
- Review Long Term Financial Plan (LTFP) each year based on 10 year forecasts - Undertake quarterly reporting to Council on the financial performance of the organisation. - Assets are identified for disposal to discharge the Services Relocation Loan by 2016 - 2017. - Review opportunities for sustainable and Assets equitable increases to Council’s income supported by the community. - Continue to analyse opportunities to expand the revenue base of Council. - Ensure the commercial property portfolio provides market returns. Manager Integrated Planning, Property |
|
L2.1.4 Council has increased its commitment to infrastructure asset management priorities. |
- Identify available funding sources in the LTFP and allocate to priority projects. - Funding strategies are developed and implemented in line with Council’s Assets adopted Asset Management Strategy. - Regularly revise Council’s strategic asset management plans and integrate with financial planning processes. - Continually improve the integrity of asset data and asset registers. - Implement asset management plans and progress improvement plans for each asset class. - Implement an integrated corporate asset management system for all asset classes. |
Governance Matters
Section 45 of the Local Government Act, 1993 prevents Council from selling; exchanging, or otherwise disposing of Community classified land therefore it is proposed to reclassify the site from Community Land to Operational Land in accordance with Section 27 of the Act.
At its Ordinary meeting of Council on 11 November 2014, Council resolved to prepare a Planning Proposal to amend the Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan (Local Centres) 2012 to reclassify the site from Community land to Operational land and increase the maximum FSR from 1.3:1 to 2.0:1. A Planning Proposal, prepared in accordance with Section 55, Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979, was submitted to the Department of Planning and Environment on 26 May 2015. A Gateway Determination is yet to be issued for the Planning Proposal.
Should Council adopt Option 2 or Option 3 for the site, a variation to the Planning Proposal would be required to facilitate the implementation of either option.
Under section 58 of the EP&A Act, Council may, at any time, vary its proposals as a consequence of its consideration of any submission or report during community consultation or for any other reason. If it does so, a revised planning proposal is to be forwarded to the Minister.
Risk Management
The main risk for Council of undertaking the reclassification process is community concern about the loss of community assets; this can impact on Council’s reputation.
The case of the library precinct is different to other sites Council has put forward for reclassification because:
· Council has clearly articulated its intention to create a new community hub on the western side of Lindfield local centre which will replace the existing facilities with new, larger purpose-built facilities. This proposal is supported by two recent studies: The Ku-ring-gai Community Facilities Strategy (Elton Consulting, 2013) and the Lindfield Community Facilities Study (Elton Consulting, 2013).
· Council has committed to a master planning process for the Woodford Lane precinct which is currently underway and will add further weight to Council’s vision.
· Council has been actively acquiring land in the Woodford Lane precinct; to date Council has acquired almost 5,000m2 of land on Bent Street, an area of land equivalent almost equivalent to that of the library precinct (which is about 5,800m2 in area).
A second risk is managing the quality of development within the library precinct. This could be mitigated by Council preparing a development application and selling the site with a development approval for a well-designed development with an appropriate level of density and scale which is economically feasible.
A third risk is, if Council were to sell the land, the purchaser may seek greater height and density through a planning proposal under Part 3 Division 4 of the EPA Act. This risk may also be mitigated by Council preparing a development application and selling the site with a development approval.
There are significant risks for Council in relation to any decisions it makes regarding zoning, reclassification, planning controls, and/or divestment for any of its town centre sites or “hub” projects. These risks are potential loss of revenue in the event a site is sold with lesser development yield than might reasonably expected under a new regime of dwelling targets and where a purchaser subsequently comes back to Council with a planning proposal for an uplift in controls, and/or that the “opportunity” for greater dwelling production on key town centre sites is simply lost by development at lesser height and density.
Notwithstanding that the State Government has not made any specific pronouncements about increased dwelling targets since it was first elected, there is a plethora of material available in the public realm that points to significantly increased dwelling targets for all metropolitan councils when draft subregional plans are released later in 2015. This is supported by the current subregional planning process being conducted by the Department of Planning and Environment in which all councils are being consulted, but arguably not engaged in any meaningful way, about new targets. It is also arguable that subregional plans were substantially completed before the State election, with release being held back until arrangements for the greater Sydney Commission are finalised and closer to when decisions are made in relation to local government amalgamations.
Barring direct intervention by the Department or the new Greater Sydney Commission in the spatial distribution of new dwellings at a local level, Council will have to make decisions about the form of its town centres going forward. Specifically, Council may be required to deliberate as to whether the currently relatively contained town centres are developed to be higher and denser than currently envisaged under the Local Centres LEP, or are they more spread out than at present, assuming continuation of the current, generally five storey, model. In this respect, the achievement of dwelling targets in the town centres specifically is being hampered by the constrained development controls applied to some sites in the translation of the Town Centres LEP into Council’s Local Centres LEP. Many sites in the core of the town centres remain marginal or unviable notwithstanding the recent property price escalation in Sydney. This contention is supported by much of the viability work Council itself commissioned in its local centres planning process, and which has been more recently confirmed by the Department of Planning and Environment though demonstration of an Urban Feasibility Model developed to guide subregional planning.
Financial Considerations
There are no direct financial impacts to Council as a result of this report.
If reclassification was to proceed and Council resolved to reclassify the site from Community Land to Operational Land this would facilitate potential future sale of the Lindfield library precinct. The proceeds of the sale of the site could be used in a number of ways:
· to pay down debt associated with the purchase of 828 pacific Highway, Gordon;
· to address the asset renewal gap (funding shortfall) by returning the funds to reserves for expenditure on new assets or major asset refurbishment in accordance with the Long Term Financial Plan (LTFP) guiding principles (LTFP, page 4); or
· to fund Council’s co-contribution for projects identified in the Development Contributions Plan 2010. The LTFP proposes that asset sales from rationalisation of property assets commence in 2015/16 and continue over a 10 year period as Contribution Plan projects proceed (LTFP, page 23).
Social Considerations
It is noted that this site is likely to have some social significance given that it has been the site of the library since 1954, however the Lindfield Community Hub will provide for the continued provision of contemporary designed community facilities within the local precinct.
The preferred option (Option 2) proposes to include a child care centre. This could be owned by council, and leased to a commercial operator, providing both long term income for Council and retention of a community facility on the site which reflects the current site use.
Historical Archaeological Assessment recommends that the well be left in situ and incorporated into the new design. However, if this option is not feasible due to construction restraints, removal with relocation and interpretation should be considered. It is further recommended that interpretation of the well be relocated to the associated Lindfield Community Hub site, being a more publicly accessible location.
Interpretation of the site’s archaeological resource, post excavation, should warrant the implementation of a public interpretation program (possibly in the form of interpretive signage or other suitable medium) in order to offset development impacts on the potential significant resource that may exist on site;
Environmental Considerations
The planning proposal for the reclassification will not result in any additional environmental effects to those considered during the preparing of the draft Local Centres LEP.
Due-diligence studies have been undertaken in relation to site contamination, subject to further investigation.
Community Consultation
Statutory community consultation will be carried out through the planning proposal process. An independently chaired public hearing is also necessary in relation to reclassification from Community land to Operational land.
It is proposed to exhibit an architectural concept for the subject site at the same time as the reclassification exhibition is underway; at the same time Council has recently completed an exhibition of options for the Lindfield Community Hub which are publicly available. In this way the community can be well informed as to Council’s long term intentions to replace the existing facilities and relocate existing services into new and larger facilities in a more accessible location.
Internal Consultation
This report was prepared by the Strategy & Environment Department in consultation with staff from other Departments where relevant.
Summary
This report provides an update to Council on the progress of planning for the site and a recommendation for a preferred option for the potential redevelopment of the existing Lindfield library precinct at 259-271 Pacific Highway, Lindfield.
The urban design study considered three built form options:
· Option 1 - FSR of 1.75:1, building heights between 5 - 6 storeys, generating 94 dwellings (units) and 163 car parking spaces;
· Option 2 - FSR of 1.75:1, a range of building heights between 4-6 storeys, generating 106 dwellings (units) and 150 car parks; and
· Option 3 - FSR of 2.0:1, a mix of building heights ranging from 4-7 storeys, generating 121 dwellings (units) and 171 car parks.
Option 2 has been assessed as the preferred option, primarily because of the proposed range of building heights between 4-6 storeys (FSR 1.75:1) which is considered optimal for the site as a transition from high density to medium density. Option 3 is identical to option 2 except that the proposed building heights up to 7 storeys (FSR 2.0:1) which is considered less suitable for this site.
The financial feasibility analysis finds that:
· Option 1 has the lowest projected financial return;
· Option 2 has the median projected financial return; and
· Option 3 has the highest projected financial return
The Feasibility Assessment for the subject site concludes:
· residential uses are the ‘highest and best use’ of the site and should be maximised;
· the value of the site with development approval is estimated to be approximately 15% more than without development approval; and
· that Council pursue development approval on the site or offer a sale and leaseback, to provide the developer time to achieve a development approval. A timeframe of 12-18 months would be ideal from the markets perspective.
The adoption of either Option 2 or Option 3 for the site would require a variation to the existing planning proposal applying to the site and resubmission to the Department of Planning and Environment under Section 58 of the EP&A Act.
Should Council adopt Option 2, then it is recommended that the existing Planning Proposal applying to the site be amended as follows:
· Zoning of the site changed from Zone B2 Local Centre to Zone R4 high Density Residential
· Maximum building height increased from 17.5metres to 20.5 metres
· Maximum FSR decreased from 2.0:1 to 1.8:1
· Office and business premises included as addition permitted uses under Schedule 1 of KLEP (Local Centres) 2012
Should Council adopt Option 3, then it is recommended that the existing Planning Proposal applying to the site be amended as follows:
· Zoning of the site changed from Zone B2 Local Centre to Zone R4 high Density Residential;
· Maximum building height increased from 17.5metres to 23.5 metres;
· Office and business premises included as addition permitted uses under Schedule 1 of KLEP (Local Centres) 2012.
A. Council adopts for the site at 259-271 Pacific Highway, Lindfield:
Either
a) Built Form Option 2 with an FSR of 1.8:1, a building heights between 4-6 storeys or b) Built Form Option 3 with an FSR of 2.0:1 and a building height of between 4-7 storeys
B. That Council proceed to prepare an illustrated concept design of the selected option for public exhibition in conjunction with the reclassification exhibition.
C. That the existing Planning Proposal applying to the site be varied in accordance with section 58 of the EP&A Act as follows:
Either
a) To facilitate built form Option 2 by: - Zoning of the site changed from Zone B2 Local Centre to Zone R4 high Density Residential - Maximum building height increased from 17.5 metres to 20.5 metres - Maximum FSR decreased from 2.0:1 to 1.8:1 - Office and business premises included as addition permitted uses under Schedule 1 of KLEP (Local Centres) 2012
b) To facilitate built form Option 3 by:
- Zoning of the site changed from Zone B2 Local Centre to Zone R4 high Density Residential - Maximum building height increased from 17.5metres to 23.5 metres - Office and business premises included as addition permitted uses under Schedule 1 of KLEP (Local Centres) 2012
|
Louise Drum Senior Urban Designer |
Bill Royal Team Leader Urban Design |
Andrew Watson Director Strategy & Environment |
|
A1View |
Lindfield Library Precinct - Design Report - Stage 3 - final draft - SJB |
|
2015/186698 |
|
|
JLL Lindfield Library Feasibility Study 15-07-15 FINAL |
|
Confidential |
|
|
A3View |
Lindfield Library Precinct - Historical Archaeological Assessment - Final Report - June 2015 |
|
2015/184951 |
APPENDIX No: 1 - Lindfield Library Precinct - Design Report - Stage 3 - final draft - SJB |
|
Item No: GB.7 |
APPENDIX No: 3 - Lindfield Library Precinct - Historical Archaeological Assessment - Final Report - June 2015 |
|
Item No: GB.7 |
Ordinary Meeting of Council - 28 July 2015 |
NM.1 / 236 |
|
|
Item NM.1 |
S09042 |
|
16 July 2015 |
Notice of Motion
Site Inspection, Canoon Road Netball Complex
Notice of Motion from Councillor Malicki dated 16 July 2015
I move that a site inspection be conducted for all available Councillors with a staff member to the Canoon Road Netball Complex on Saturday 1st August.
This inspection is to be in the Council bus or a staff vehicle depending on the number of Councillors expected to attend, and a recording be made for those Councillors who are unable to attend on the day.
That the above Notice of Motion as printed be adopted.
|
Councillor Elaine Malicki Councillor for Comenarra Ward |
|
Ordinary Meeting of Council - 28 July 2015 |
NM.2 / 237 |
|
|
Item NM.2 |
S10098 |
|
17 July 2015 |
Notice of Rescission
33 Grandview Street, Pymble - Part E of Minute 196 from the Ordinary Meeting of Council 14 July 2015
Notice of Rescission from Councillors Berlioz, Citer and Malicki dated 17 July 2015
We move Rescission of 33 Grandview Street from Part E of Minute 196 from the Ordinary Meeting of Council 14 July 2015 namely:
E. That Council defers any decision in regards to 6 Caithness Street and 33 Grandview Street for a Council briefing from a Heritage expert.
That the above Notice of Rescission as printed be adopted.
|
Councillor Christiane Berlioz Councillor for St Ives Ward |
Councillor David Citer Councillor for Gordon Ward |
Councillor Elaine Malicki Councillor for Comenarra Ward |
|