Ordinary Meeting of Council
TO BE HELD ON Tuesday, 9 February 2016 AT 7.00pm
Level 3 Council Chamber
Agenda
** ** ** ** ** **
NOTE: For Full Details, See Council’s Website –
www.kmc.nsw.gov.au under the link to business papers
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
Confirmation of Reports to be Considered in Closed Meeting
NOTE:
That in accordance with the provisions of Section 10 of the Local Government Act 1993, all officers’ reports be released to the press and public, with the exception of confidential attachments to the following General Business reports:
GB.6 Extension - Waste Collection Contract
Attachment A1: .............................................................. Costing proposal
Attachment A2: .............................................................. Agreement letter
Attachment A3: .................................... Proposed minor changed to Contract
Address the Council
NOTE: Persons who address the Council should be aware that their address will be tape recorded.
Documents Circulated to Councillors
CONFIRMATION OF MINUTEs
Minutes of Ordinary Meeting of Council 8
File: S02131
Meeting held 15 December 2015
Minutes numbered 424 to 441
minutes from the Mayor
MM.1 Establishment of the "Ku-ring-gai Architecture and Urban Design Awards" program 89
File: S08367
The Ku-ring-gai local government area has a distinct character stemming from its high quality architecture, landscaping and tall canopy Blue Gum High Forest and Sydney Turpentine bushland.
The area has a rich natural and built heritage with many fine historical and modern dwellings, apartment buildings and commercial works by highly respected and recognised architects such as Walter Burley Griffin, Harry Seidler and Alex Tzannes.
The establishment of an Architecture and Urban Design Awards program will not only retain and improve the urban fabric of this area, but also allow Ku-ring-gai Council to
· encourage ongoing excellence in architectural, urban and heritage conservation design;
· provide architects, builders and property owners an opportunity to exhibit notable building works;
· recognise and celebrate positive contributions to the streetscape and the Ku-ring-gai area character;
· increase community interest and awareness of high quality development in the locality;
· publicise Ku-ring-gai Council’s unique natural and built environment to a broader audience.
A number of local Councils have established such programs (Randwick/Mosman). They have utilised it as a means of gaining recognition for their area and encouraging development by reputable architects and builders. Their programs have grown in popularity and prestige due to the high quality of entrants and respected judges. In addition, the program has been successful in the engagement of the local community through a ‘People’s Choice Award’ category.
Ku-ring-gai Council could adopt a model for delivery similar to other Councils and award various categories of development such as dwelling houses, heritage conservation and adaptive reuse, apartment and mixed use buildings, commercial and public buildings, landscape and urban projects, with judging by an expert architectural panel.
It is recommended that Council consider establishing the Ku-ring-gai Architecture and Urban Design Awards program, and a Report be brought back to Council on the funding and administration of such an initiative.
MM.2 2016 Australia Day Honours and Citizen of the Year Awards 91
File: S07765/7
I am pleased to inform you that 9 Ku-ring-gai citizens, through their outstanding achievements and services to the community have been awarded 2016 Australia Day Honours.
We are very proud to have these dedicated and talented Australians as members of the Ku-ring-gai community.
I would like to read to you the names of these special Ku-ring-gai citizens and, on behalf of Council, congratulate them on their excellent contributions to Australian society.
Susan Bartlett ALEXANDER OAM of Gordon, for service to the community, particularly to children’s welfare
Lady Joyce Elizabeth BEATTIE OAM of Warrawee, for service to lawn bowls, and to people with disabilities
Arthur David BRAWN OAM of Killara, for service to the community, particularly through Rotary
Noel Herman CISLOWSKI AM of Roseville, for significant service to the performing arts, particularly to speech and drama, to music, and to a range of community organisations
Megan Finlay FOOKES OAM of Roseville, for service to people living with rare diseases
Michael KEATS OAM of Pymble, for service to bushwalking, and as an author
Brendan Patrick O’CONNELL OAM of St Ives, for service to the community through a range of organisations
Bruce James STANDEN AM of Gordon, for significant service to primary industry, particularly to agricultural economics, sustainability and research
Patricia Kathleen WETTON OAM of St Ives, for service to people with a disability, and to the community
I also congratulate Ku-ring-gai’s Citizen of the Year winners for 2016:
Citizen of the Year - John Dailey
Young Citizen of the Year - Ashlee Jaensch,
Nick Bennett
Outstanding Service to the Community
(Individual) - Sue Turner
Outstanding Service to the Community
(Group) - Ku-ring-gai Community Workshop ‘The Shed’
On behalf of Council, I congratulate all these award winners on their outstanding achievements.
Ku-ring-gai should be proud that it has so many citizens being recognised at the highest level for their selfless dedication, commitment and contribution to local, national and international communities.
Petitions
GENERAL BUSINESS
i. The Mayor to invite Councillors to nominate any item(s) on the Agenda that they wish to have a site inspection.
ii. The Mayor to invite Councillors to nominate any item(s) on the Agenda that they wish to adopt in accordance with the officer’s recommendation allowing for minor changes without debate.
GB.1 Investment Report as at 31 December 2015 93
File: S05273
To present Council’s investment portfolio performance for December 2015.
Recommendation:
That the summary of investments performance for December 2015 be received and noted; and that the Certificate of the Responsible Accounting Officer be noted and report adopted.
GB.2 Conference - Urban Transport Australia 2016 103
File: FY00581
To advise Council of the 2016 Urban Transport Australia Conference.
Recommendation:
That any Councillors interested in attending the 2016 Urban Transport Australia conference advise the General Manager by Friday, 25 March 2016.
GB.3 LGMA Councillors' Weekend Seminar - 26-27 February 2016 115
File: FY00581
To advise Council of the LGMA Councillors’ Weekend Seminar being held in Sydney on 26-27 February 2016.
Recommendation:
That any Councillors interested in attending the 2016 LGMA Councillors’ Weekend Seminar advise the General Manager by Monday, 15 February 2016.
GB.4 Local Government NSW Tourism Conference 2016 120
File: FY00581
To advise Council of the Local Government NSW (LGNSW) 2016 Tourism Conference.
Recommendation:
That any Councillors interested in attending the LGNSW 2016 Tourism Conference advise the General Manager by Wednesday, 17 February 2016.
GB.5 DA0380/15 - demolition of existing structures and construction of a 3 storey residential flat building containing 8 units 129
File: DA0380/15
Ward: Wahroonga
Applicant: Pix Projects Pty Ltd
Owner: G & K Hercus
Demolition of existing structures and construction of a 3 storey residential flat building containing 8 units
Recommendation:
Approval
GB.6 Extension - Waste Collection Contract 250
File: S02294
To seek Council’s endorsement for an extension to the existing waste collection contract.
Recommendation:
That Council offer Veolia Environmental Services an extension to the waste and recycling collection Contract to September 2017.
GB.7 Report
following the exhibition of the
Draft Ku-ring-gai S94A Contributions Plan 2015 255
File: S10604
The purpose of this report is to report back to Council following the exhibition of the draft S94A Contributions Plan 2015.
Recommendation:
That the draft S94A Contributions Plan 2015 be adopted as Ku-ring-gai S94A Contributions Plan 2015. That the adoption and date of coming into effect be advertised in accordance with the legislation.
GB.8 Road Closure Application - Newhaven Place St Ives 306
File: 88/05859/01
For Council to consider the formal public road closure of a constructed pathway between Newhaven Place and Links Road St Ives.
Recommendation:
That Council commence a formal road closure application for the constructed pathway between 10 and 12 Newhaven Place St Ives to be submitted to the Department of Primary Industries – Lands.
GB.9 Gordon Civic and Cultural Hub - update in response to NSW Government merger proposal 315
File: S10376
The purpose of this report is to advise Council of the impacts of the NSW Government Merger Proposal on the Gordon Cultural and Civic Hub Master Plan project.
Recommendation:
This report recommends that the Gordon Cultural and Civic Hub Master Plan Project be deferred for the foreseeable future until broader strategic matters arising from the NSW Government Merger Proposal for Hornsby Shire Council (part) and Ku-ring-gai Council have been resolved; and that the community be notified of Council’s decision.
Extra Reports Circulated to Meeting
Motions of which due Notice has been given
NM.1 Culworth Avenue Carpark 322
File: S09750
Notice of Motion from Councillors Citer and Szatow dated 29 January 2016
At its meeting of 13 May 2014, the Council approved negotiations for part of the Culworth Avenue Carpark site to be permanently used and managed for commuter parking by Transport for NSW. Transport for NSW indicated it met operational objectives through compulsory acquisition of 3667 sqm of the site. On 27 May 2014 meeting, Council voted to accept the recommendation not to object to part of the site being compulsorily acquired by Transport for NSW for use as a commuter carpark.
However, this leaves vast uncertainty with the remaining portion of the carpark site, which is currently with the Minister for Planning for reclassification from Community land to Operational Land, which could result in a subsequent sale for high density housing or units.
In our current environment of choked roads and poor railway infrastructure, we believe the entire Culworth Avenue Carpark should be retained for future generations, to enable residents of Ku-ring-gai access to railway parking, given the large increase in population density that we will experience in Northern Sydney, over the next twenty years. We have an onus as Councillors to ensure we make logical planning decisions around our residents’ infrastructure, especially when we are encouraging Australians to use public transport, to reduce their carbon footprint.
We move that:
Council formally write to the Minister for Planning, requesting that the reclassification of Culworth Avenue Carpark in Killara, remain on hold with Government, to enable Council staff to further negotiate with Transport for NSW, for the continuing use of the site as a car park.
BUSINESS WITHOUT NOTICE – SUBJECT TO CLAUSE 241 OF GENERAL REGULATIONS
Questions Without Notice
Inspections Committee – SETTING OF TIME, DATE AND RENDEZVOUS
** ** ** ** ** **
MINUTES
OF Ordinary Meeting of Council
HELD ON Tuesday, 15 December 2015
Present: |
The Mayor, Councillor C Szatow (Chairperson) (Gordon Ward) Councillors E Malicki & J Pettett (Comenarra Ward) Councillors C Berlioz & D Ossip (St Ives Ward) Councillors J Anderson & D Armstrong (Roseville Ward) Councillors C Fornari-Orsmond & D McDonald (Wahroonga Ward) |
|
|
Staff Present: |
General Manager (John McKee) Director Corporate (David Marshall) Director Development & Regulation (Michael Miocic) Director Operations (Greg Piconi) Director Strategy & Environment (Andrew Watson) Director Community (Janice Bevan) Corporate Lawyer (Jamie Taylor) Manager Corporate Communications (Virginia Leafe) Manager Records and Governance (Amber Moloney) Minutes Secretary (Sigrid Banzer) |
The Meeting commenced at 7:00 pm
The Mayor offered the Prayer
Councillor David Citer tendered an apology for non-attendance (ill health) and requested leave of absence.
Councillor David Ossip advised he would be late.
|
|
|
(Moved: Councillors Malicki/Armstrong)
That the apologies be accepted and leave of absence granted.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY |
The Mayor adverted to the necessity for Councillors and staff to declare a Pecuniary Interest/Conflict of Interest in any item on the Business Paper.
The General Manager advised staff declarations of interest for item C2 2016 General Manager’s Performance Agreement – Monitoring Review and advised that the General Manager and staff would be absent during the debate.
Councillor McDonald advised that he has a small business and declared a less than significant non-pecuniary interest in item GB.3 Small Business Friendly Councils Program and Small Business Forums and would not be leaving the Chamber during debate.
The following members of the public addressed Council on items not on the agenda:
C Ryan – Ku-ring-gai Division of St John Ambulance
B Irwin – Ray Street Development
L Wilson – Ku-ring-gai Philharmonic Orchestra update
D Warner – Gordon area
DOCUMENTS CIRCULATED TO COUNCILLORS
The Mayor adverted to the documents circulated in the Councillors’ papers and advised that the following matters would be dealt with at the appropriate time during the meeting:
Late Items: |
Minutes from Ordinary Meeting of Council 8 December 2015 |
Late Confidential Items: |
C2 – General Manager’s Performance Review |
Memorandums: |
Memorandum from Director Corporate dated 9 December 2015 containing additional information relating to item GB.5 Destruction of Council Records |
PETITIONS
File: S10376 Vide: PT.1
|
|
|
“We, the undersigned, (Seven hundred and Ninety Five (795) Signatures) urge the Council to lead the community by planning to renovate the Marian Street Theatre.”
Today Ku-ring-gai will vote on the possibility of selling the iconic Marian Street Theatre as part of resolutions to approve a civic and cultural hub at Gordon. The report makes it clear that the cultural hub cannot be funded without sale of the Marian Street Theatre, although there is no current proposal to sell the building.
This well-known building has been a theatre since 1967, cherished both by the local community and the theatre world. It is also the only theatre building on the upper North Shore, which was closed for urgent repairs two years ago, leaving Marian Street Theatre for Young People, Australia’s longest-running children’s theatre, without a permanent home, despite the theatre being renovated and reopened as recently as 2012. Marian Street Theatre would be an ideal venue for small independent theatre companies and community groups like MSTYP, desperate for an affordable dedicated theatre space. These groups cannot pay the fees charged by larger venues nearby. The proposed new Hub contains a multi-purpose performance space but not a theatre. Taking the best ideas from reports commissioned by Council over the past few years would provide these important groups with the space they need and bring Marian Street Theatre back to life.
We are urging Council to lead the community by planning to renovate the theatre, without detracting from the need for the Hub as an excellent long-range plan – but subject to making proper provision for a theatre.
|
|
(Moved: Councillors Armstrong/Malicki)
That the petition be received and referred to the appropriate Officer of Council for attention.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY |
Councillor Ossip arrived
Supplementary Report 610 Pacific Highway, Killara
File: DA0303/14 Vide: GB.7
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
To determine Development Application DA0303/14 for, ‘demolition of existing residential flat building and construction of new residential flat building containing ten apartments’.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Moved: Councillors McDonald/Pettett)
PURSUANT TO SECTION 80(1) OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT ACT, 1979
THAT Council, as the consent authority, is of the opinion that the objections under State Environmental Planning Policy No. 1 - Development Standards to the development standards for site coverage, minimum allotment size and number of storeys in Part 3A of the Ku-ring-gai Planning Scheme Ordinance are well founded. The Council is also of the opinion that strict compliance with the development standards is unreasonable and unnecessary in the circumstances of this case.
AND
THAT the Council, as the consent authority, being satisfied that the objections under SEPP No. 1 are well founded and also being of the opinion that the granting of consent to DA0303/14 is consistent with the aims of the Policy, grant development consent to DA0303/14 for demolition of the existing residential flat building and construction of a new residential flat building containing ten apartments on land at 610 Pacific Highway, Killara, for a period of two (2) years from the date of the Notice of Determination, subject to the following conditions:
The conditions of consent are as follows:
Conditions that identify approved plans:
1. Approved architectural plans and documentation (new development)
The development must be carried out in accordance with the following plans and documentation listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, except where amended by other conditions of this consent:
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
2. Inconsistency between documents
In the event of any inconsistency between conditions of this consent and the drawings/documents referred to above, the conditions of this consent prevail.
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
Conditions to be satisfied prior to demolition, excavation or construction:
3. Asbestos works
All work involving asbestos products and materials, including asbestos-cement-sheeting (ie. Fibro), must be carried out in accordance with the guidelines for asbestos work published by WorkCover Authority of NSW.
Reason: To ensure public safety
4. Notice of commencement
At least 48 hours prior to the commencement of any development (including demolition, excavation, shoring or underpinning works), a notice of commencement of building or subdivision work form and appointment of the principal certifying authority form shall be submitted to Council.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
5. Notification of builder’s details
Prior to the commencement of any development or excavation works, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be notified in writing of the name and contractor licence number of the owner/builder intending to carry out the approved works.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
6. Dilapidation survey and report (public infrastructure)
Prior to the commencement of any development or excavation works on site, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a dilapidation report on the visible and structural condition of all structures of the following public infrastructure, has been completed and submitted to Council:
Public infrastructure
· Full road pavement width, including kerb and gutter, of Pacific Highwayt and Spencer Road over the site frontage, including the full intersection. · All driveway crossings and laybacks opposite the subject site.
The report must be completed by a consulting structural/civil engineer. Particular attention must be paid to accurately recording (both written and photographic) existing damaged areas on the aforementioned infrastructure so that Council is fully informed when assessing any damage to public infrastructure caused as a result of the development.
The developer may be held liable to any recent damage to public infrastructure in the vicinity of the site, where such damage is not accurately recorded by the requirements of this condition prior to the commencement of works.
Note: A written acknowledgment from Council must be obtained (attesting to this condition being appropriately satisfied) and submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the commencement of any excavation works.
Reason: To record the structural condition of public infrastructure before works commence.
7. Dilapidation survey and report (private property)
Prior to the commencement of any demolition or excavation works on site, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a dilapidation report on the visible and structural condition of all structures upon the following lands, has been completed and submitted to Council:
The dilapidation report must include a photographic survey of adjoining properties detailing their physical condition, both internally and externally, including such items as walls ceilings, roof and structural members. The report must be completed by a consulting structural/geotechnical engineer as determined necessary by that professional based on the excavations for the proposal and the recommendations of the submitted geotechnical report.
In the event that access for undertaking the dilapidation survey is denied by a property owner, the applicant must demonstrate in writing to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority that all reasonable steps have been taken to obtain access and advise the affected property owner of the reason for the survey and that these steps have failed.
Note: A copy of the dilapidation report is to be provided to Council prior to any excavation works been undertaken. The dilapidation report is for record keeping purposes only and may be used by an applicant or affected property owner to assist in any civil action required to resolve any dispute over damage to adjoining properties arising from works.
Reason: To record the structural condition of likely affected properties before works commence.
8. Construction and traffic management plan
The applicant must submit to Council a Construction Traffic Management Plan (TMP), which is to be approved prior to the commencement of any works on site.
The plan is to consist of a report with Traffic Control Plans attached.
The report is to contain commitments which must be followed by the demolition and excavation contractor, builder, owner and subcontractors. The TMP applies to all persons associated with demolition, excavation and construction of the development.
The report is to contain construction vehicle routes for approach and departure to and from all directions.
The report is to contain a site plan showing entry and exit points. Swept paths are to be shown on the site plan showing access and egress for an 11 metre long heavy rigid vehicle.
The Traffic Control Plans are to be prepared by a qualified person (red card holder). One must be provided for each of the following stages of the works:
· Demolition · Excavation · Concrete pour · Construction of vehicular crossing and reinstatement of footpath · Traffic control for vehicles reversing into or out of the site.
Traffic controllers must be in place at the site entry and exit points to control heavy vehicle movements in order to maintain the safety of pedestrians and other road users.
When a satisfactory TMP is received, a letter of approval will be issued with conditions attached. Traffic management at the site must comply with the approved TMP as well as any conditions in the letter issued by Council. Council’s Rangers will be patrolling the site regularly and fines will be issued for any non-compliance with this condition.
A works zone along the Pacific Highway site frontage will not be supported by the RMS or along the frontage of Spencer Road given that the site is within 20m of a traffic signal. Construction vehicle movements for demolition, excavation and construction stages are required to be undertaken on site.
Reason: To ensure that appropriate measures have been considered during all phases of the construction process in a manner that maintains the environmental amenity and ensures the ongoing safety and protection of people.
9. Sediment controls
Prior to any work commencing on site, sediment and erosion control measures shall be installed along the contour immediately downslope of any future disturbed areas.
The form of the sediment controls to be installed on the site shall be determined by reference to the Landcom manual ‘Managing Urban Stormwater: Soils and Construction’. The erosion controls shall be maintained in an operational condition until the development activities have been completed and the site fully stabilised. Sediment shall be removed from the sediment controls following each heavy or prolonged rainfall period.
Reason: To preserve and enhance the natural environment.
10. Erosion and drainage management
Earthworks and/or demolition of any existing buildings shall not commence until an erosion and sediment control plan is submitted to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority. The plan shall comply with the guidelines set out in the NSW Department of Housing manual "Managing Urban Stormwater: Soils and Construction" certificate. Erosion and sediment control works shall be implemented in accordance with the erosion and sediment control plan.
Reason: To preserve and enhance the natural environment.
11. Tree protection fencing excluding structure
To preserve the following tree/s, no work shall commence until the area beneath their canopy excluding that area of the approved driveway/ basement shall be fenced off for the specified radius from the trunk to prevent any activities, storage or the disposal of materials within the fenced area. The fence/s shall be maintained intact until the completion of all demolition/building work on site:
Reason: To protect existing trees during the construction phase.
12. Tree protective fencing type galvanised mesh
The tree protection fencing shall be constructed of galvanised pipe at 2.4 metres spacing and connected by securely attached chain mesh fencing to a minimum height of 1.8 metres in height prior to work commencing.
Reason: To protect existing trees during construction phase.
13. Tree protection signage
Prior to works commencing, tree protection signage is to be attached to each tree protection zone, displayed in a prominent position and the sign repeated at 10 metres intervals or closer where the fence changes direction. Each sign shall contain in a clearly legible form, the following information:
Tree protection zone.
· This fence has been installed to prevent damage to the trees and their growing environment both above and below ground and access is restricted. · Any encroachment not previously approved within the tree protection zone shall be the subject of an arborist's report. · The arborist's report shall provide proof that no other alternative is available. · The Arborist's report shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority for further consultation with Council. · The name, address, and telephone number of the developer.
Reason: To protect existing trees during the construction phase.
14. Tree protection mulching
Prior to works commencing and throughout construction, the area of the tree protection zone of all trees to be retained is to be mulched to a depth of 100mm with composted organic material being 75% Eucalyptus leaf litter and 25% wood.
Reason: To protect existing trees during the construction phase.
15. Tree fencing inspection
Upon installation of the required tree protection measures, an inspection of the site by the Principal Certifying Authority is required to verify that tree protection measures comply with all relevant conditions.
Reason: To protect existing trees during the construction phase.
16. Noise and vibration management plan
Prior to the commencement of any works, a noise and vibration management plan is to be prepared by a suitably qualified expert addressing the likely noise and vibration from demolition, excavation and construction of the proposed development and provided to the Principal Certifying Authority. The management plan is to identify amelioration measures to achieve the best practice objectives of AS 2436-2010 and NSW Department of Environment and Climate Change Interim Construction Noise Guidelines. The report shall be prepared in consultation with any geotechnical report that itemises equipment to be used for excavation works.
The management plan shall address, but not be limited to, the following matters:
· identification of the specific activities that will be carried out and associated noise sources · identification of all potentially affected sensitive receivers, including residences, churches, commercial premises, schools and properties containing noise sensitive equipment · the construction noise objective specified in the conditions of this consent · the construction vibration criteria specified in the conditions of this consent · determination of appropriate noise and vibration objectives for each identified sensitive receiver · noise and vibration monitoring, reporting and response procedures · assessment of potential noise and vibration from the proposed demolition, excavation and construction activities, including noise from construction vehicles and any traffic diversions · description of specific mitigation treatments, management methods and procedures that will be implemented to control noise and vibration during construction · construction timetabling to minimise noise impacts including time and duration restrictions, respite periods and frequency · procedures for notifying residents of construction activities that are likely to affect their amenity through noise and vibration · contingency plans to be implemented in the event of non-compliances and/or noise complaints
Reason: To protect the amenity afforded to surrounding residents during the construction process.
Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of the construction certificate:
17. Fire egress
A second exit is to be provided from the basement carpark level in accordance with Part D1.2 of the Building Code of Australia. To provide fire egress to the street, an additional set of steps are to be provided between the externa northern fire egress path and the driveway Details are to be submitted with the Construction Certificate application.
Reason: to ensure egress from the building.
18. Sanitary doors
Internal WC doors are to comply with Part F2.5 where there is less than 1.2m clearance, details are to be submitted with the Construction Certificate application.
Reason: to ensure access in the event of an emergency.
19. Planter boxes
Planter boxes with a height of 1m and width of 1m and containing appropriate plant species to soften the visual appearance of the development are to be added to the western side of the terrace of Unit 301 on the second floor level. Amended plans which comply with this requirement are to be submitted to the certifying authority for approval prior to the issue of a construction certificate.
Reason: To soften the building form and achieve successful integration of the building into the garden setting of the area.
20. Amendments to approved landscape plan
Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the approved landscape plans, listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, have been amended in accordance with the requirements of this condition as well as other conditions of this consent:
The above landscape plan(s) shall be amended in the following ways:
· The plans are to be in accordance with amended architectural plans and as per relevant conditions. The proposed stormwater pits in accordance with the stormwater plan.
· Proposed predominantly native plant species within the front setback such as Acacia myrtifolia, Carex, Lomandra and Leucopogan are to be substituted with predominantly exotic garden species to be sympathetic with the existing landscape character. Moisture loving rainforest species should also be incorporated where possible to complement the existing feature tree (Tree 2), including Lilly Pilly, Cordyline sp.and Cissus sp,
· Proposed planting of the Gingko biloba is to be in the approximate location of Tree 1 and set back a minimum of 5 metres from the proposed building.
· Existing edging along the existing driveway is to be shown to be retained and protected during construction. Low planting is to be carefully planted between the edging and the proposed driveway edge. Planting of shrubs within the tree protection zone of Tree 2 is to be located outside of the structural root zone (3.5m).
· The existing trees along the western boundary to be retained and removed are to be clearly marked on the plan in accordance with the amended survey prepared by Hill and Blume, Reference 52312 Issue A, dated 23/07/15. Trees are to be numbered in accordance with the Addendum to the Arboricultural Impact Assessment prepared by Advanced Treescape Consulting, dated 8/10/15. The existing retaining wall along the western boundary at the northwest corner of the site is to be retained and protected in association with existing Trees A7, A8 and A10.
· The proposed planting of Ceratopetalum gummiferum (NSW Christmas Bush) along the northern boundary is to be substituted with upright medium size deciduous trees such as Pyrus calleryana.
Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the amended landscape plan has been submitted as required by this condition.
Note: An amended landscape plan shall be submitted to the Certifying Authority.
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
21. Amendments to approved engineering plans
Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the approved engineering plan(s), listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, have been amended in accordance with the requirements of this condition as well as other conditions of this consent:
The above engineering plan(s) shall be amended as follows:
1. To preserve the following tree, the 225mm diameter stormwater line behind the front boundary is to be thrust bored. A notation is to be provided indicating the method of installation.
2. The existing trees to be retained are to be numbered on all stormwater plans in accordance with the landscape plan.
3. The southern wall of the basement is to be constructed using contiguous piling to minimise encroachments into the TPZ of Tree 2 (Kauri Pine).
Note: An amended engineering plan, prepared by a qualified engineer shall be submitted to the Certifying Authority.
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
22. Long service levy
In accordance with Section 109F(i) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act a Construction Certificate shall not be issued until any long service levy payable under Section 34 of the Building and Construction Industry Long Service Payments Act 1986 (or where such levy is payable by instalments, the first instalment of the levy) has been paid. Council is authorised to accept payment. Where payment has been made elsewhere, proof of payment is to be provided to Council.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
23. Builder’s indemnity insurance
The applicant, builder, developer or person who does the work on this development, must arrange builder’s indemnity insurance and submit the certificate of insurance in accordance with the requirements of Part 6 of the Home Building Act 1989 to the Certifying Authority for endorsement of the plans accompanying the Construction Certificate.
It is the responsibility of the applicant, builder or developer to arrange the builder's indemnity insurance for residential building work over the value of $20,000. The builder's indemnity insurance does not apply to commercial or industrial building work or to residential work valued at less than $20,000, nor to work undertaken by persons holding an owner/builder's permit issued by the Department of Fair Trading (unless the owner/builder's property is sold within 7 years of the commencement of the work).
Reason: Statutory requirement.
24. Air drying facilities
Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a common open space area dedicated for open air drying of clothes is provided. This area is to be located at ground level behind the building line and in a position not visible from the public domain.
Reason: Amenity & energy efficiency.
25. External service pipes and the like prohibited
Proposed water pipes, waste pipes, stack work, duct work, mechanical ventilation plant and the like must be located within the building. Details confirming compliance with this condition must be shown on construction certificate plans and detailed with construction certificate specifications. Required external vents or vent pipes on the roof or above the eaves must be shown on construction certificate plans and detailed with construction certificate specifications. External vents or roof vent pipes must not be visible from any place unless detailed upon development consent plans. Where there is any proposal to fit external service pipes or the like this must be detailed in an amended development (S96) application and submitted to Council for determination.
Vent pipes required by Sydney Water must not be placed on the front elevation of the building or front roof elevation. The applicant, owner and builder must protect the appearance of the building from the public place and the appearance of the streetscape by elimination of all external services excluding vent pipes required by Sydney Water and those detailed upon development consent plans.
Reason: To protect the streetscape and the integrity of the approved development.
26. Access for people with disabilities (residential)
Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that access for people with disabilities to and from and between the public domain, residential units and all common open space areas is provided. Consideration must be given to the means of dignified and equitable access.
Compliant access provisions for people with disabilities shall be clearly shown on the plans submitted with the Construction Certificate. All details shall be provided to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate. All details shall be prepared in consideration of the Disability Discrimination Act, and the relevant provisions of AS1428.1, AS1428.2, AS1428.4 and AS 1735.12.
Reason: To ensure the provision of equitable and dignified access for all people in accordance with disability discrimination legislation and relevant Australian Standards.
27. Adaptable unit
Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the nominated adaptable unit (Unit 302), has been designed as 'Adaptable house class C' in accordance with the provisions of Australian Standard AS4299-1995: Adaptable Housing. At least one bedroom in the unit must be of sufficient size (without requiring any modification) to accommodate a queen size bed, a wardrobe and the circulation space requirements of AS 1428.1.
Note: Evidence from an appropriately qualified professional demonstrating compliance with this control is to be submitted to and approved by the Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate.
Reason: Disabled access & amenity.
28. Excavation for services
Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that no proposed underground services (ie: water, sewerage, drainage, gas or other service) unless previously approved by conditions of consent, are located beneath the canopy of any tree protected under Council’s Tree Preservation Order, located on the subject allotment and adjoining allotments.
Note: A plan detailing the routes of these services and trees protected under the Tree Preservation Order shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority.
Reason: To ensure the protection of trees.
29. Noise from road (residential only)
Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the development will be acoustically designed and constructed to ensure that the following LAeq levels are not exceeded: (a) in any bedroom in the building-35 dB(A) at any time between 10 pm and 7 am, (b) anywhere else in the building (other than a garage, kitchen, bathroom or hallway)-40 dB(A) at any time.
Plans and specifications of the required acoustic design shall be prepared by a practicing acoustic engineer and shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority.
Reason: To minimise the impact of noise from the adjoining road or rail corridor on the occupants of the development.
30. Location of plant (residential flat buildings)
Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that all plant and equipment (including but not limited to air conditioning equipment) is located within the basement. Certification from a suitably qualified HVAC Engineer is to be provided to the Certifying Authority.
Note: Architectural plans identifying the location of all plant and equipment shall be provided to the Certifying Authority.
Reason: To minimise impact on surrounding properties, improved visual appearance and amenity for locality.
31. Driveway crossing levels
Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, driveway and associated footpath levels for any new, reconstructed or extended sections of driveway crossings between the property boundary and road alignment must be obtained from Ku-ring-gai Council. Such levels are only able to be issued by Council under the Roads Act 1993. All footpath crossings, laybacks and driveways are to be constructed according to Council's specifications "Construction of Gutter Crossings and Footpath Crossings".
Specifications are issued with alignment levels after completing the necessary application form at Customer Services and payment of the assessment fee. When completing the request for driveway levels application from Council, the applicant must attach a copy of the relevant development application drawing which indicates the position and proposed level of the proposed driveway at the boundary alignment.
This development consent is for works wholly within the property. Development consent does not imply approval of footpath or driveway levels, materials or location within the road reserve, regardless of whether this information is shown on the development application plans. The grading of such footpaths or driveways outside the property shall comply with Council's standard requirements. The suitability of the grade of such paths or driveways inside the property is the sole responsibility of the applicant and the required alignment levels fixed by Council may impact upon these levels.
The construction of footpaths and driveways outside the property in materials other than those approved by Council is not permitted.
Reason: To provide suitable vehicular access without disruption to pedestrian and vehicular traffic.
32. Driveway grades - basement carparks
Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, longitudinal driveway sections are to be prepared by a qualified civil/traffic engineer and be submitted for to and approved by the Certifying Authority. These profiles are to be at 1:100 scale along both edges of the proposed driveway, starting from the centreline of the frontage street carriageway to the proposed basement floor level. The traffic engineer shall provide specific written certification on the plans that:
· vehicular access can be obtained using grades of 20% (1 in 5) maximum and · all changes in grade (transitions) comply with Australian Standard 2890.1 -“Off-street car parking” (refer clause 2.5.3) to prevent the scraping of the underside of vehicles.
If a new driveway crossing is proposed, the longitudinal sections must incorporate the driveway crossing levels as issued by Council upon prior application.
Reason: To provide suitable vehicular access without disruption to pedestrian and vehicular traffic.
33. Basement car parking details
Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, certified parking layout plan(s) to scale showing all aspects of the vehicle access and accommodation arrangements must be submitted to and approved by the Certifying Authority. A qualified civil/traffic engineer must review the proposed vehicle access and accommodation layout and provide written certification on the plans that:
· all parking space dimensions, driveway and aisle widths, driveway grades, transitions, circulation ramps, blind aisle situations and other trafficked areas comply with Australian Standard 2890.1 - 2004 “Off-street car parking” · a clear height clearance of 2.6 metres (required under DCP40 for waste collection trucks) is provided over the designated garbage collection truck manoeuvring areas within the basement · no doors or gates are provided in the access driveways to the basement carpark which would prevent unrestricted access for internal garbage collection at any time from the basement garbage storage and collection area · the vehicle access and accommodation arrangements are to be constructed and marked in accordance with the certified plans
Reason: To ensure that parking spaces are in accordance with the approved development.
34. Car parking allocation
Car parking within the development shall be allocated in the following way:
The adaptable dwelling must be provided with a car space complying with the dimensional and location requirements of AS2890.1 - parking spaces for people with disabilities.
Consideration must be given to the means of access from disabled car parking spaces to other areas within the building and to footpath and roads and shall be clearly shown on the plans submitted with the Construction Certificate.
Reason: To ensure equity of access and appropriate facilities are available for people with disabilities in accordance with federal legislation.
35. Number of bicycle spaces
The basement car park shall be adapted to provide a minimum of three bicycle spaces in accordance with DCP 55. The bicycle parking spaces shall be designed in accordance with AS2890.3. Details shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the Certifying Authority prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate.
Reason: To provide alternative modes of transport to and from the site.
36. Energy Australia requirements
Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, the applicant must contact Energy Australia regarding power supply for the subject development. A written response detailing the full requirements of Energy Australia (including any need for underground cabling, substations or similar within or in the vicinity the development) shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority for approval prior to issue of the Construction Certificate.
Any structures or other requirements of Energy Australia shall be indicated on the plans issued with the Construction Certificate, to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority and Energy Australia. The requirements of Energy Australia must be met in full prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate.
Reason: To ensure compliance with the requirements of Energy Australia.
37. Utility provider requirements
Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, the applicant must make contact with all relevant utility providers whose services will be impacted upon by the development. A written copy of the requirements of each provider, as determined necessary by the Certifying Authority, must be obtained. All utility services or appropriate conduits for the same must be provided by the developer in accordance with the specifications of the utility providers.
Reason: To ensure compliance with the requirements of relevant utility providers.
38. Underground services
All electrical services (existing and proposed) shall be undergrounded from the proposed building on the site to the appropriate power pole(s) or other connection point. Undergrounding of services must not disturb the root system of existing trees and shall be undertaken in accordance with the requirements of the relevant service provided. Documentary evidence that the relevant service provider has been consulted and that their requirements have been met are to be provided to the Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate. All electrical and telephone services to the subject property must be placed underground and any redundant poles are to be removed at the expense of the applicant.
Reason: To provide infrastructure that facilitates the future improvement of the streetscape by relocation of overhead lines below ground.
Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of the construction certificate or prior to demolition, excavation or construction (whichever comes first):
39. Infrastructure restorations fee
To ensure that damage to Council Property as a result of construction activity is rectified in a timely matter:
a) All work or activity taken in furtherance of the development the subject of this approval must be undertaken in a manner to avoid damage to Council Property and must not jeopardise the safety of any person using or occupying the adjacent public areas.
b) The applicant, builder, developer or any person acting in reliance on this approval shall be responsible for making good any damage to Council Property, and for the removal from Council Property of any waste bin, building materials, sediment, silt, or any other material or article.
c) The Infrastructure Restoration Fee must be paid to the Council by the applicant prior to both the issue of the Construction Certificate and the commencement of any earthworks or construction.
d) In consideration of payment of the Infrastructure Restorations Fee, Council will undertake such inspections of Council Property as Council considers necessary and also undertake, on behalf of the applicant, such restoration work to Council Property, if any, that Council considers necessary as a consequence of the development. The provision of such restoration work by the Council does not absolve any person of the responsibilities contained in (a) to (b) above. Restoration work to be undertaken by the Council referred to in this condition is limited to work that can be undertaken by Council at a cost of not more than the Infrastructure Restorations Fee payable pursuant to this condition.
e) In this condition:
“Council Property” includes any road, footway, footpath paving, kerbing, guttering, crossings, street furniture, seats, letter bins, trees, shrubs, lawns, mounds, bushland, and similar structures or features on any road or public road within the meaning of the Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) or any public place; and
“Infrastructure Restoration Fee” means the Infrastructure Restorations Fee calculated in accordance with the Schedule of Fees & Charges adopted by Council as at the date of payment and the cost of any inspections required by the Council of Council Property associated with this condition.
Reason: To maintain public infrastructure.
40. Section 94 development contributions - other than identified centres (For DAs determined on or after 19 December 2010).
This development is subject to a development contribution calculated in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010, being a s94 Contributions Plan in effect under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, as follows:
The contribution shall be paid to Council prior to the issue of any Construction Certificate, Linen Plan, Certificate of Subdivision or Occupation Certificate whichever comes first in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010.
The contributions specified above are subject to indexation and may vary at the time of payment in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 to reflect changes in the consumer price index and housing price index. Prior to payment, please contact Council directly to verify the current payable contributions.
Copies of Council’s Contribution Plans can be viewed at Council Chambers, 818 Pacific Hwy Gordon or on Council’s website at www.kmc.nsw.gov.au.
Notwithstanding the total above, in accordance with the s94E Direction issued by the Minister for Planning dated 3 March 2011, for so long as it remains legally in force, the maximum amount payable for the subject development application shall be $20,000 x 10 = $200,000.
Reason: To ensure the provision, extension or augmentation of the Key Community Infrastructure identified in Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 that will, or is likely to be, required as a consequence of the development.
Conditions to be satisfied during the demolition, excavation and construction phases:
41. Road opening permit
The opening of any footway, roadway, road shoulder or any part of the road reserve shall not be carried out without a road opening permit being obtained from Council (upon payment of the required fee) beforehand.
Reason: Statutory requirement (Roads Act 1993 Section 138) and to maintain the integrity of Council’s infrastructure.
42. Prescribed conditions
The applicant shall comply with any relevant prescribed conditions of development consent under clause 98 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation. For the purposes of section 80A (11) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, the following conditions are prescribed in relation to a development consent for development that involves any building work:
· The work must be carried out in accordance with the requirements of the Building Code of Australia · In the case of residential building work for which the Home Building Act 1989 requires there to be a contract of insurance in force in accordance with Part 6 of that Act, that such a contract of insurance is in force before any works commence.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
43. Hours of work
Demolition, excavation, construction work and deliveries of building material and equipment must not take place outside the hours of 7.00am to 5.00pm Monday to Friday and 8.00am to 12 noon Saturday. No work and no deliveries are to take place on Sundays and public holidays.
Excavation or removal of any materials using machinery of any kind, including compressors and jack hammers, must be limited to between 7.30am and 5.00pm Monday to Friday, with a respite break of 45 minutes between 12 noon 1.00pm.
Where it is necessary for works to occur outside of these hours (ie) placement of concrete for large floor areas on large residential/commercial developments or where building processes require the use of oversized trucks and/or cranes that are restricted by the RTA from travelling during daylight hours to deliver, erect or remove machinery, tower cranes, pre-cast panels, beams, tanks or service equipment to or from the site, approval for such activities will be subject to the issue of an "outside of hours works permit" from Council as well as notification of the surrounding properties likely to be affected by the proposed works.
Note: Failure to obtain a permit to work outside of the approved hours will result in on the spot fines being issued.
Reason: To ensure reasonable standards of amenity for occupants of neighbouring properties.
44. Approved plans to be on site
A copy of all approved and certified plans, specifications and documents incorporating conditions of consent and certification (including the Construction Certificate if required for the work) shall be kept on site at all times during the demolition, excavation and construction phases and must be readily available to any officer of Council or the Principal Certifying Authority.
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
45. Construction noise
During excavation, demolition and construction phases, noise generated from the site shall be controlled in accordance with the recommendations of the approved noise and vibration management plan.
Reason: To ensure reasonable standards of amenity to neighbouring properties.
46. Site notice
A site notice shall be erected on the site prior to any work commencing and shall be displayed throughout the works period.
The site notice must:
· be prominently displayed at the boundaries of the site for the purposes of informing the public that unauthorised entry to the site is not permitted · display project details including, but not limited to the details of the builder, Principal Certifying Authority and structural engineer · be durable and weatherproof · display the approved hours of work, the name of the site/project manager, the responsible managing company (if any), its address and 24 hour contact phone number for any inquiries, including construction/noise complaint are to be displayed on the site notice · be mounted at eye level on the perimeter hoardings/fencing and is to state that unauthorised entry to the site is not permitted
Reason: To ensure public safety and public information.
47. Dust control
During excavation, demolition and construction, adequate measures shall be taken to prevent dust from affecting the amenity of the neighbourhood. The following measures must be adopted:
· physical barriers shall be erected at right angles to the prevailing wind direction or shall be placed around or over dust sources to prevent wind or activity from generating dust · earthworks and scheduling activities shall be managed to coincide with the next stage of development to minimise the amount of time the site is left cut or exposed · all materials shall be stored or stockpiled at the best locations · the ground surface should be dampened slightly to prevent dust from becoming airborne but should not be wet to the extent that run-off occurs · all vehicles carrying spoil or rubble to or from the site shall at all times be covered to prevent the escape of dust · all equipment wheels shall be washed before exiting the site using manual or automated sprayers and drive-through washing bays · gates shall be closed between vehicle movements and shall be fitted with shade cloth · cleaning of footpaths and roadways shall be carried out daily
Reason: To protect the environment and amenity of surrounding properties.
48. Post-construction dilapidation report
The applicant shall engage a suitably qualified person to prepare a post construction dilapidation report at the completion of the construction works. This report is to ascertain whether the construction works created any structural damage to adjoining buildings, infrastructure and roads. The report is to be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority. In ascertaining whether adverse structural damage has occurred to adjoining buildings, infrastructure and roads, the Principal Certifying Authority must:
· compare the post-construction dilapidation report with the pre-construction dilapidation report · have written confirmation from the relevant authority that there is no adverse structural damage to their infrastructure and roads.
A copy of this report is to be forwarded to Council at the completion of the construction works.
Reason: Management of records.
49. Compliance with submitted geotechnical report
A contractor with specialist excavation experience must undertake the excavations for the development and a suitably qualified and consulting geotechnical engineer must oversee excavation.
Geotechnical aspects of the development work, namely:
· appropriate excavation method and vibration control · support and retention of excavated faces · hydro-geological considerations
must be undertaken in accordance with the recommendations of the Geotechnical Report dated 12 June 2014 prepared by JK Geotechnics Pty Ltd. Approval must be obtained from all affected property owners, including Ku-ring-gai Council, where rock anchors (both temporary and permanent) are proposed below adjoining property(ies).
Reason: To ensure the safety and protection of property.
50. Use of road or footpath
During excavation, demolition and construction phases, no building materials, plant or the like are to be stored on the road or footpath without written approval being obtained from Council beforehand. The pathway shall be kept in a clean, tidy and safe condition during building operations. Council reserves the right, without notice, to rectify any such breach and to charge the cost against the applicant/owner/builder, as the case may be.
Reason: To ensure safety and amenity of the area.
51. Guarding excavations
All excavation, demolition and construction works shall be properly guarded and protected with hoardings or fencing to prevent them from being dangerous to life and property.
Reason: To ensure public safety.
52. Toilet facilities
During excavation, demolition and construction phases, toilet facilities are to be provided, on the work site, at the rate of one toilet for every 20 persons or part of 20 persons employed at the site.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
53. Protection of public places
If the work involved in the erection, demolition or construction of the development is likely to cause pedestrian or vehicular traffic in a public place to be obstructed or rendered inconvenient, or building involves the enclosure of a public place, a hoarding or fence must be erected between the work site and the public place.
If necessary, a hoarding is to be erected, sufficient to prevent any substance from, or in connection with, the work falling into the public place.
The work site must be kept lit between sunset and sunrise if it is likely to be hazardous to persons in the public place.
Any hoarding, fence or awning is to be removed when the work has been completed.
Reason: To protect public places.
54. Recycling of building material (general)
During demolition and construction, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that building materials suitable for recycling have been forwarded to an appropriate registered business dealing in recycling of materials. Materials to be recycled must be kept in good order.
Reason: To facilitate recycling of materials.
55. Construction signage
All construction signs must comply with the following requirements:
· are not to cover any mechanical ventilation inlet or outlet vent · are not illuminated, self-illuminated or flashing at any time · are located wholly within a property where construction is being undertaken · refer only to the business(es) undertaking the construction and/or the site at which the construction is being undertaken · are restricted to one such sign per property · do not exceed 2.5m2 · are removed within 14 days of the completion of all construction works
Reason: To ensure compliance with Council's controls regarding signage.
56. Approval for rock anchors
Approval is to be obtained from the property owner for any anchors proposed beneath adjoining private property. If such approval cannot be obtained, then the excavated faces are to be shored or propped in accordance with the recommendations of the geotechnical and structural engineers.
Reason: To ensure the ongoing safety and protection of property.
57. Maintenance period for works in public road
A maintenance period of six (6) months applies to all work in the public road reserve carried out by the applicant - after the works have been completed to the satisfaction of Ku-ring-gai Council. In that maintenance period, the applicant shall be liable for any section of the public infrastructure work which fails to perform in the designed manner, or as would reasonably be expected under the operating conditions. The maintenance period shall commence once the applicant receives a formal letter from Council stating that the works involving public infrastructure have been completed satisfactorily.
Reason: To protect public infrastructure.
58. Road reserve safety
All public footways and roadways fronting and adjacent to the site must be maintained in a safe condition at all times during the course of the development works. Construction materials must not be stored in the road reserve. A safe pedestrian circulation route and a pavement/route free of trip hazards must be maintained at all times on or adjacent to any public access ways fronting the construction site. Where public infrastructure is damaged, repair works must be carried out when and as directed by Council officers. Where pedestrian circulation is diverted on to the roadway or verge areas, clear directional signage and protective barricades must be installed in accordance with AS1742-3 (1996) “Traffic Control Devices for Work on Roads”. If pedestrian circulation is not satisfactorily maintained across the site frontage, and action is not taken promptly to rectify the defects, Council may undertake proceedings to stop work.
Reason: To ensure safe public footways and roadways during construction.
59. Services
Where required, the adjustment or inclusion of any new utility service facilities must be carried out by the applicant and in accordance with the requirements of the relevant utility authority. These works shall be at no cost to Council. It is the applicants’ full responsibility to make contact with the relevant utility authorities to ascertain the impacts of the proposal upon utility services (including water, phone, gas and the like). Council accepts no responsibility for any matter arising from its approval to this application involving any influence upon utility services provided by another authority.
Reason: Provision of utility services.
60. Erosion control
Temporary sediment and erosion control and measures are to be installed prior to the commencement of any works on the site. These measures must be maintained in working order during construction works up to completion. All sediment traps must be cleared on a regular basis and after each major storm and/or as directed by the Principal Certifying Authority and Council officers.
Reason: To protect the environment from erosion and sedimentation.
61. Sydney Water Section 73 Compliance Certificate
The applicant must obtain a Section 73 Compliance Certificate under the Sydney Water Act 1994. An application must be made through an authorised Water Servicing CoOrdinator. The applicant is to refer to “Your Business” section of Sydney Water’s web site at www.sydneywater.com.au then the “e-develop” icon or telephone 13 20 92. Following application a “Notice of Requirements” will detail water and sewer extensions to be built and charges to be paid. Please make early contact with the CoOrdinator, since building of water/sewer extensions can be time consuming and may impact on other services and building, driveway or landscape design.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
62. Project arborist
A suitably qualified project arborist (AQF level 5) is to be engaged to advise the Principal Certifying Authority on the protection of trees at the site and to supervise the installation and maintenance of tree protection measures required by this consent.
Prior to the commencement of any works including demolition on the site in areas required to be protected by this consent, the project arborist shall inspect the site and satisfy himself/herself that the protection measures are in accordance with the approved design and must provide a written certification to the Principal Certifying Authority to that effect.
If not satisfied, the project arborist must provide to the Principal Certifying Authority a list of works that are to be completed to ensure compliance with all conditions of consent relating to the protection of trees at the site. Those works must be undertaken to the satisfaction of the project arborist. Reason: To ensure protection of existing trees
63. Canopy/root pruning
Canopy and/or root pruning of the following tree/s which is necessary to accommodate the approved building works shall be undertaken by an experienced Arborist/Horticulturist, with a minimum qualification of the Horticulture Certificate or Tree Surgery Certificate. All pruning works shall be undertaken as specified in Australian Standard 4373-2007 - Pruning of Amenity Trees.
Reason: To protect the environment.
64. Treatment of tree roots
If tree roots are required to be severed for the purposes of constructing the approved works, they shall be cut cleanly by hand, by an experienced Arborist/Horticulturist with a minimum qualification of Horticulture Certificate or Tree Surgery Certificate. All pruning works shall be undertaken as specified in Australian Standard 4373-2007 – Pruning of Amenity Trees.
Reason: To protect existing trees.
65. Hand excavation
All excavation except for the basement and driveway ramp within the specified radius of the trunk(s) of the following tree(s) shall be hand dug:
Reason: To protect existing trees.
66. Thrust boring
Excavation for the installation of any services within the specified radius of the trunk/s of the following tree/s shall utilise the thrust boring method. Thrust boring shall be carried out at least 600mm beneath natural ground level to minimise damage to tree/s root system:
Reason: To protect existing trees.
67. No storage of materials beneath trees
No activities, storage or disposal of materials shall take place beneath the canopy of any tree protected under Council's Tree Preservation Order at any time.
Reason: To protect existing trees.
68. Removal of refuse
All builders' refuse, spoil and/or material unsuitable for use in landscape areas shall be removed from the site on completion of the building works.
Reason: To protect the environment.
69. Canopy replenishment trees to be planted
The canopy replenishment trees to be planted shall be maintained in a healthy and vigorous condition until they attain a height of 5.0 metres whereby they will be protected by Council’s Tree Preservation Order. Any of the trees found faulty, damaged, dying or dead shall be replaced with the same species
Reason: To maintain the treed character of the area.
70. Survey and inspection of waste collection clearance and path of travel
At the stage when formwork for the ground floor slab is in place and prior to concrete being poured, a registered surveyor is to:
· ascertain the reduced level of the underside of the slab at the driveway entry · certify that the level is not lower than the level shown on the approved DA plans · certify that the minimum headroom of 2.6 metres will be available for the full path of travel of the small waste collection vehicle from the street to the collection area · this certification is to be provided to Council’s Development Engineer prior to any concrete being poured for the ground floor slab · no work is to proceed until Council has undertaken an inspection to determine clearance and path of travel
At the stage when formwork for the ground floor slab is in place and prior to concrete being poured, Council’s Development Engineer and Manager Waste Services are to carry out an inspection of the site to confirm the clearance available for the full path of travel of the small waste collection vehicle from the street to the collection area. This inspection may not be carried out by a private certifier because waste management is not a matter listed in Clause 161 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000.
Reason: To ensure access will be available for Council’s contractors to collect waste from the collection point.
71. On site retention of waste dockets
All demolition, excavation and construction waste dockets are to be retained on site, or at suitable location, in order to confirm which facility received materials generated from the site for recycling or disposal.
· each docket is to be an official receipt from a facility authorised to accept the material type, for disposal or processing · this information is to be made available at the request of an authorised officer of Council
Reason: To protect the environment.
Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate:
72. Easement for waste collection
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, an easement for waste collection is to be created under Section 88B of the Conveyancing Act 1919. This is to permit legal access for Council, Council’s contractors and their vehicles over the subject property for the purpose of collecting waste from the property. The terms of the easement are to be generally in accordance with Council’s draft terms for an easement for waste collection and shall be to the satisfaction of Council’s Development Engineer.
Reason: To permit legal access for Council, Council’s contractors and their vehicles over the subject site for waste collection.
73. Compliance with BASIX Certificate
Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that all commitments listed in BASIX Certificate No. 641610M_02 have been complied with.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
74. Clotheslines and clothes dryers
Prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the units either have access to an external clothes line located in common open space.
Reason: To provide access to clothes drying facilities.
75. Mechanical ventilation
Following completion, installation and testing of all the mechanical ventilation systems, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied of the following prior to the issue of any Occupation Certificate:
1. The installation and performance of the mechanical systems complies with:
The Building Code of Australia, Australian Standard AS1668, Australian Standard AS3666 where applicable
2. The mechanical ventilation system in isolation and in association with other mechanical ventilation equipment, when in operation will not be audible within a habitable room in any other residential premises before 7am and after 10pm Monday to Friday and before 8am and after 10pm Saturday, Sunday and public holidays. The operation of the unit outside these restricted hours shall emit a noise level of not greater than 5dbA above the background when measured at the nearest adjoining boundary.
Note: Written confirmation from an acoustic engineer that the development achieves the above requirements is to be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate.
Reason: To protect the amenity of surrounding properties.
76. Completion of landscape works
Prior to the release of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that all landscape works, including the removal of all noxious and/or environmental weed species, have been undertaken in accordance with the approved plan(s) and conditions of consent.
Reason: To ensure that the landscape works are consistent with the development consent.
77. Completion of tree works
Prior to the release of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that all tree works, including pruning in accordance with AS4373-2007 or remediation works in accordance with AS4370-2009, have been undertaken in accordance with the approved plan(s) and conditions of consent.
Reason: To ensure that the tree works are consistent with the development consent.
78. Accessibility
Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that:
· the lift design and associated functions are compliant with AS 1735.12 & AS 1428.2 · the level and direction of travel, both in lifts and lift lobbies, is audible and visible · the controls for lifts are accessible to all persons and control buttons and lettering are raised · international symbols have been used with specifications relating to signs, symbols and size of lettering complying with AS 1428.2 - 1992 · the height of lettering on signage is in accordance with AS 1428.1 - 2009 · the signs and other information indicating access and services incorporate tactile communication methods in addition to the visual methods
Reason: Disabled access & services.
79. Retention and re-use positive covenant
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the applicant must create a positive covenant and restriction on the use of land under Section 88E of the Conveyancing Act 1919, burdening the property with the requirement to maintain the site stormwater retention and re-use facilities on the property.
The terms of the instruments are to be generally in accordance with the Council's "draft terms of Section 88B instruments for protection of retention and re-use facilities" and to the satisfaction of Council (refer to appendices of Ku-ring-gai Water Management Development Control Plan No. 47). For existing titles, the positive covenant and the restriction on the use of land is to be created through an application to the Land Titles Office in the form of a request using forms 13PC and 13RPA. The relative location of the reuse and retention facility, in relation to the building footprint, must be shown on a scale sketch, attached as an annexure to the request forms.
Registered title documents showing the covenants and restrictions must be submitted to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate.
Reason: To protect the environment.
80. Certification of drainage works
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that:
· the stormwater drainage works have been satisfactorily completed in accordance with the approved Construction Certificate drainage plans · the minimum retention and on-site detention storage volume requirements of BASIX and Ku-ring-gai Water Management Development Control Plan No. 47 respectively, have been achieved · retained water is connected and available for use · basement and subsoil areas are able to drain via a pump/sump system installed in accordance with AS3500.3 and Appendix 7.1.1 of Ku-ring-gai Water Management Development Control Plan No. 47 · all grates potentially accessible by children are secured · components of the new drainage system have been installed by a licensed plumbing contractor in accordance with the Plumbing and Drainage Code AS3500.3 2003 and the Building Code of Australia · all enclosed floor areas, including habitable and garage floor levels, are safeguarded from outside stormwater runoff ingress by suitable differences in finished levels, gradings and provision of stormwater collection devices
The rainwater certification sheet contained in Appendix 13 of the Ku-ring-gai Water Management Development Control Plan No. 47, must be completed and attached to the certification. Where an on-site detention system has been constructed, the on-site detention certification sheet contained in Appendix 4 of DCP 47 must also be completed and attached to the certification.
Note: Evidence from a qualified and experienced consulting civil/hydraulic engineer documenting compliance with the above is to be provided to Council prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate.
Reason: To protect the environment.
81. WAE plans for stormwater management and disposal (dual occupancy and above)
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, a registered surveyor must provide a works as executed survey of the completed stormwater drainage and management systems. The survey must be submitted to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate. The survey must indicate:
· as built (reduced) surface and invert levels for all drainage pits · gradients of drainage lines, materials and dimensions · as built (reduced) level(s) at the approved point of discharge to the public drainage system · as built location and internal dimensions of all detention and retention structures on the property (in plan view) and horizontal distances to nearest adjacent boundaries and structures on site · the achieved storage volumes of the installed retention and detention storages and derivative calculations · as built locations of all access pits and grates in the detention and retention system(s), including dimensions · the size of the orifice or control fitted to any on-site detention system · dimensions of the discharge control pit and access grates · the maximum depth of storage possible over the outlet control · top water levels of storage areas and indicative RL’s through the overland flow path in the event of blockage of the on-site detention system
The works as executed plan(s) must show the as built details above in comparison to those shown on the drainage plans approved with the Construction Certificate prior to commencement of works. All relevant levels and details indicated must be marked in red on a copy of the Principal Certifying Authority stamped construction certificate stormwater plans.
Reason: To protect the environment.
82. Basement pump-out maintenance
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a maintenance regime has been prepared for the basement stormwater pump-out system.
Note: A maintenance regime specifying that the system is to be regularly inspected and checked by qualified practitioners is to be prepared by a suitable qualified professional and provided to the Principal Certifying Authority.
Reason: To protect the environment.
83. OSD positive covenant/restriction
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the applicant must create a positive covenant and restriction on the use of land under Section 88E of the Conveyancing Act 1919, burdening the owner with the requirement to maintain the on-site stormwater detention facilities on the lot.
The terms of the instruments are to be generally in accordance with the Council's "draft terms of Section 88B instrument for protection of on-site detention facilities" and to the satisfaction of Council (refer to appendices of Ku-ring-gai Council Water Management DCP 47). For existing titles, the positive covenant and the restriction on the use of land is to be created through an application to the Land Titles Office in the form of a request using forms 13PC and 13RPA. The relative location of the on-site detention facility, in relation to the building footprint, must be shown on a scale sketch, attached as an annexure to the request forms.
Registered title documents, showing the covenants and restrictions, must be submitted and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate.
Reason: To protect the environment.
84. Sydney Water Section 73 Compliance Certificate
Prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate the Section 73 Sydney water Compliance Certificate must be obtained and submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority
Reason: Statutory requirement.
85. Infrastructure repair
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority must be satisfied that any damaged public infrastructure caused as a result of construction works (including damage caused by, but not limited to, delivery vehicles, waste collection, contractors, sub contractors, concrete vehicles) is fully repaired to the satisfaction of Council Development Engineer and at no cost to Council.
Reason: To protect public infrastructure.
86. Fire safety certificate
Prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a Fire Safety Certificate for all the essential fire or other safety measures forming part of this consent has been completed and provided to Council.
Note: A copy of the Fire Safety Certificate must be submitted to Council.
Reason: To ensure suitable fire safety measures are in place.
Conditions to be satisfied at all times:
87. Outdoor lighting
At all times for the life of the approved development, all outdoor lighting shall not detrimentally impact upon the amenity of other premises and adjacent dwellings and shall comply with, where relevant, AS/NZ1158.3: 2005 Pedestrian Area (Category P) Lighting and AS4282: 1997 Control of the Obtrusive Effects of Outdoor Lighting.
Reason: To protect the amenity of surrounding properties.
88. Annual Fire Safety Statement
Each 12 months after the installation of essential fire or other safety measures, the owner of a building must cause the Council to be given an Annual Fire Safety Statement for the building. In addition a copy of the statement must be given to the NSW Fire Commissioner and a copy displayed prominently in the building.
Reason: To ensure statutory maintenance of essential fire safety measures.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY |
File: S08130/6 Vide: C.1
|
|
|
In accordance with the Local Government Act 1993 and the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005, in the opinion of the General Manager, the following business is of a kind as referred to in sections 10A(2)(c) & 10A(2)(g), of the Act, and should be dealt with in a part of the meeting closed to the public.
Section 10A(2)(c) of the Act permits the meeting to be closed to the public in respect of information that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business.
The matter is classified confidential because it deals with the proposed acquisition and/or disposal of property.
It is not in the public interest to release this information as it would prejudice Council’s ability to acquire and/or dispose of the property on appropriate terms and conditions.
Section 10A(2)(g) of the Act permits the meeting to be closed to the public for business relating to advice concerning litigation, or advice that would otherwise be privileged from production in legal proceedings on the ground of legal professional privilege.
This matter is classified confidential under section 10A(2)(g) because it contains advice concerning a legal matter that:
(a) is a substantial issue relating to a matter in which the Council is involved (b) is clearly identified in the advice, and (c) is fully discussed in that advice.
It is not in the public interest to release details of the legal advice as it would prejudice Council’s position in court proceedings.
Report by Manager Integrated Planning, Property & Assets dated 27 November 2015
|
|
(Moved: Councillors McDonald/Anderson)
A. That Council proceeds in the manner outlined in the report.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY |
Standing Orders were suspended to deal with items
where there are speakers first after a
Motion moved by Councillors Armstrong and Berlioz
was CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
Councillor Fornari-Orsmond withdrew during discussion
Councillor Fornari-Orsmond returned
Councillor Ossip withdrew during discussion
Councillor Ossip returned
The Meeting closed at 9.12 pm
The Minutes of the Ordinary Meeting of Council held on 15 December 2015 (Pages 1 - 88) were confirmed as a full and accurate record of proceedings on 9 February 2016.
__________________________ __________________________
General Manager Mayor / Chairperson
Ordinary Meeting of Council - 9 February 2016 |
MM.1 / 84 |
|
|
Item MM.1 |
S08367 |
|
27 January 2016 |
Mayoral Minute
Establishment of the "Ku-ring-gai Architecture and Urban Design Awards" program
The Ku-ring-gai local government area has a distinct character stemming from its high quality architecture, landscaping and tall canopy Blue Gum High Forest and Sydney Turpentine bushland.
The area has a rich natural and built heritage with many fine historical and modern dwellings, apartment buildings and commercial works by highly respected and recognised architects such as Walter Burley Griffin, Harry Seidler and Alex Tzannes.
The establishment of an Architecture and Urban Design Awards program will not only retain and improve the urban fabric of this area, but also allow Ku-ring-gai Council to
· encourage ongoing excellence in architectural, urban and heritage conservation design;
· provide architects, builders and property owners an opportunity to exhibit notable building works;
· recognise and celebrate positive contributions to the streetscape and the Ku-ring-gai area character;
· increase community interest and awareness of high quality development in the locality;
· publicise Ku-ring-gai Council’s unique natural and built environment to a broader audience.
A number of local Councils have established such programs (Randwick/Mosman). They have utilised it as a means of gaining recognition for their area and encouraging development by reputable architects and builders. Their programs have grown in popularity and prestige due to the high quality of entrants and respected judges. In addition, the program has been successful in the engagement of the local community through a ‘People’s Choice Award’ category.
Ku-ring-gai Council could adopt a model for delivery similar to other Councils and award various categories of development such as dwelling houses, heritage conservation and adaptive reuse, apartment and mixed use buildings, commercial and public buildings, landscape and urban projects, with judging by an expert architectural panel.
It is recommended that Council consider establishing the Ku-ring-gai Architecture and Urban Design Awards program, and a Report be brought back to Council on the funding and administration of such an initiative.
That Council establish a “Ku-ring-gai Architecture and Urban Design Awards” program, and a report be brought back to Council on the funding and administration of such an initiative.
|
Councillor Cheryl Szatow Mayor |
|
Ordinary Meeting of Council - 9 February 2016 |
MM.2 / 86 |
|
|
Item MM.2 |
S07765/7 |
|
29 January 2016 |
Mayoral Minute
2016 Australia Day Honours and Citizen of the Year Awards
I am pleased to inform you that 9 Ku-ring-gai citizens, through their outstanding achievements and services to the community have been awarded 2016 Australia Day Honours.
We are very proud to have these dedicated and talented Australians as members of the Ku-ring-gai community.
I would like to read to you the names of these special Ku-ring-gai citizens and, on behalf of Council, congratulate them on their excellent contributions to Australian society.
Susan Bartlett ALEXANDER OAM of Gordon, for service to the community, particularly to children’s welfare
Lady Joyce Elizabeth BEATTIE OAM of Warrawee, for service to lawn bowls, and to people with disabilities
Arthur David BRAWN OAM of Killara, for service to the community, particularly through Rotary
Noel Herman CISLOWSKI AM of Roseville, for significant service to the performing arts, particularly to speech and drama, to music, and to a range of community organisations
Megan Finlay FOOKES OAM of Roseville, for service to people living with rare diseases
Michael KEATS OAM of Pymble, for service to bushwalking, and as an author
Brendan Patrick O’CONNELL OAM of St Ives, for service to the community through a range of organisations
Bruce James STANDEN AM of Gordon, for significant service to primary industry, particularly to agricultural economics, sustainability and research
Patricia Kathleen WETTON OAM of St Ives, for service to people with a disability, and to the community
I also congratulate Ku-ring-gai’s Citizen of the Year winners for 2016:
Citizen of the Year - John Dailey
Young Citizen of the Year - Ashlee Jaensch,
Nick Bennett
Outstanding Service to the Community
(Individual) - Sue Turner
Outstanding Service to the Community
(Group) - Ku-ring-gai Community Workshop ‘The Shed’
On behalf of Council, I congratulate all these award winners on their outstanding achievements.
Ku-ring-gai should be proud that it has so many citizens being recognised at the highest level for their selfless dedication, commitment and contribution to local, national and international communities.
A. That Council acknowledge the outstanding contribution made by these recipients of 2016 Australia Day Honours to the Ku-ring-gai community and to the well-being of our society.
B. That the Mayor write to the recipients on behalf of Council to congratulate them on receiving their award, including a copy of this Mayoral Minute.
|
Councillor Cheryl Szatow Mayor |
|
Ordinary Meeting of Council - 9 February 2016 |
GB.1 / 88 |
|
|
Item GB.1 |
S05273 |
|
13 January 2016 |
Investment Report as at 31 December 2015
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
purpose of report: |
To present Council’s investment portfolio performance for December 2015. |
|
|
background: |
Council’s investments are reported monthly to Council in accordance with the Local Government Act 1993, the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 and Council’s Investment Policy. |
|
|
comments: |
The net return on investments for the financial year to December 2015 was $1,958,000 against a revised budget of $1,909,000, giving a YTD favourable variance of $49,000. |
|
|
recommendation: |
That the summary of investments performance for December 2015 be received and noted; and that the Certificate of the Responsible Accounting Officer be noted and report adopted. |
Purpose of Report
To present Council’s investment portfolio performance for December 2015.
Background
Council’s investments are reported monthly to Council in accordance with the Local Government Act 1993, the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 and Council’s Investment Policy.
Comments
Investment Portfolio Performance Snapshot
The table below provides the investments portfolio performance against targets identified in Council’s Investment Policy as well as other key performance indicators based on industry benchmarks.
Cumulative Investment Returns against Revised Budget
The net return on investments for the financial year to December 2015 was $1,958,000 against a revised budget of $1,909,000 giving a YTD favourable variance of $49,000. An adjustment to the interest income budget (reduction of $300,000) was adopted by Council in the September Quarterly Budget Review, taking into account the interest returns to-date and the lower future interest rate forecasts compared to the budget.
The total return on investments (interest and net capital gain) for the month of December is provided below.
A comparison of the cumulative investment returns against year to date revised budget is shown in the Chart below.
Cash Flow and Investment Movements
Council’s total cash and investment portfolio at the end of December 2015 was $116,531,000, compared to $117,951,000 at the end of November 2015, a net cash outflow of $1,420,000. The cash outflow was mainly due to mid financial year loan repayments.
Two investments have matured in December 2015. Three new investments were made during the month.
Table 1 below provides detailed movements of investments by institution name, investment rating and interest rate.
Table 1 – Investment Movements – December 2015
Investment Performance against Industry Benchmarks
Overall during the month of December the investment performance was well above the industry benchmark. The benchmark is specific to the type of investment and the details are provided below.
Ø UBS Bank Bill Index is used for all Council’s investments
A comparison of the portfolio returns against the investment benchmark is provided in Table 2 below.
Table 2 - Investments Performance against Industry Benchmarks
Table 3 below provides a summary of all investments by type and performance during the month.
Attachment A1 provides definitions in relation to different types of investments.
Table 3 - Investments Portfolio Summary during December 2015
Investment by Credit rating and Maturity Profile
The allocation of Council’s investments by credit rating and the maturity profile are shown below:
integrated planning and reporting
Leadership & Governance
Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective |
Delivery Program Term Achievement |
Operational Plan Task |
L2.1 Council rigorously manages its financial resources and assets to maximise delivery of services |
Council maintains and improves its long term financial position and performance. |
Continue to analyse opportunities to expand the revenue base of Council |
FIT FOR THE FUTURE IMPROVEMENT ACTION PLAN
The NSW Government's Fit for the Future initiative required all councils to prepare an Improvement Proposal and supporting Implementation Plan demonstrating how all seven Fit for the Future benchmarks would be met by 2016/17, and maintained or improved thereafter.
Council's Fit For the Future Improvement Proposal and supporting Implementation Plan underpins the decision to stand alone and not merge with Hornsby Council. The objectives established in the Improvement Proposal and Implementation Plan are embedded in Council's adopted Integrated Planning and Reporting documents including the Revised Delivery Program 2013-2017 and Operational Plan 2015-2016, Long Term Financial Plan 2015/16 to 2024/25 and Asset Management Strategy 2015/16 to 2024/25.
SUSTAINABILITY |
|||||
Objective |
Action |
Timeframe |
Target |
Measure |
Link to Term Achievement |
Maintain a strong level of own source operating revenue |
Monitor Investments portfolio to maximise interest earnings |
Monthly |
Outperform Investments benchmark (UBS Bank Bill Index) |
Meet budget & investments benchmark |
L2.1.1 Council maintains and improves its long term financial position and performance |
Under Sustainability of the Improvement Action Plan, Council will monitor its investments portfolio on a monthly basis and aim to maximise the interest earnings. The target is to outperform the investment benchmark (UBS Bank Bill Index) and meet the income revised budget. Council’s investments portfolio has exceeded the benchmark for the past three years.
Governance Matters
Council’s investments are made in accordance with the Local Government Act (1993), the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 and Council’s Investment Policy.
A revised Investment Policy was adopted by Council on 10 December 2013.
Section 212 of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 states:
(1) The responsible accounting officer of a council:
(a) must provide the council with a written report (setting out details of all money that the council has invested under section 625 of the Act) to be presented:
(i) if only one ordinary meeting of the council is held in a month, at that meeting, or
(ii) if more than one such meeting is held in a month, at whichever of those meetings the council by resolution determines, and
(b) must include in the report a certificate as to whether or not the investment has been made in accordance with the Act, the regulations and the council’s investment policies.
(2) The report must be made up to the last day of the month immediately preceding the meeting.
Risk Management
Council manages the risk associated with investments by diversifying the types of investment, credit quality, counterparty exposure and term to maturity profile.
Council invests its funds in accordance with The Ministerial Investment Order.
All investments are made with consideration of advice from Council’s appointed investment advisor, CPG Research & Advisory.
Council has one “Grandfathered” investment in structured products that was previously entered into in accordance with The Ministerial Investment Order at the time. The Ministerial Investment Order no longer allows investment in this product. This investment is:
CPDO PP – Royal Bank of Scotland
This Constant Proportion Debt Obligations Principal Protected (CPDO PP), with a face value of $6,000,000, is invested by Council on a “held to maturity” basis being September 2016. This CPDO is capital protected at maturity date by Royal Bank of Scotland. Since December 2011 it ceased to pay interest, due to a decrease in the credit indices it was linked to, creating an unwind event. The investment now takes the form of a zero coupon senior bank bond with a value of $6M. While Council intends to hold this investment to maturity, the market value at 31 December 2015 was quoted by RBS Morgan at $5,861,000.
Financial Considerations
The revised budget for interest on investments for the financial year 2015/2016 is $3,768,000. Of this amount approximately $2,605,000 is restricted for the benefit of future expenditure relating to development contributions, $687,400 transferred to the internally restricted Infrastructure & Facility Reserve, and the remainder of $475,600 is available for operations.
Social Considerations
Not applicable.
Environmental Considerations
Not applicable.
Community Consultation
None undertaken or required.
Internal Consultation
None undertaken or required.
Certification - Responsible Accounting Officer
I hereby certify that the investments listed in the attached report have been made in accordance with Section 625 of the Local Government Act 1993, clause 212 of the Local Government General Regulation 2005 and Council’s Investment Policy.
Summary
As at 31 December 2015:
· Council’s total cash and investment portfolio is $116,531,000.
· The net return on investments for the financial year to December 2015 was $1,958,000 against a revised budget of $1,909,000, giving a YTD favourable variance of $49,000.
A. That the summary of investments and performance for December 2015 be received and noted.
B. That the Certificate of the Responsible Accounting Officer be noted and the report adopted.
|
Tony Ly Financial Accounting Officer |
Angela Apostol Manager Finance |
David Marshall Director Corporate |
|
Investments definitions specific to Council’s investment portfolio |
|
2015/017138 |
Ordinary Meeting of Council - 9 February 2016 |
GB.2 / 98 |
|
|
Item GB.2 |
FY00581 |
|
18 January 2016 |
Conference - Urban Transport Australia 2016
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
purpose of report: |
To advise Council of the 2016 Urban Transport Australia Conference. |
|
|
background: |
The conference will be held in Sydney from 19-20 April 2016. |
|
|
comments: |
The focus of the conference will be on the strategic long term planning of state transport infrastructure in order to accommodate the expected population growth of 30.5 million by 2031. Co-located with the Annual Road and Rail 2016 structures summit, Urban Transport Australia 2016 will feature case studies from across Australia and interactive panel discussions to help facilitate discussion on key areas of urban transport development. |
|
|
recommendation: |
That any Councillors interested in attending the 2016 Urban Transport Australia conference advise the General Manager by Friday, 25 March 2016. |
Purpose of Report
To advise Council of the 2016 Urban Transport Australia Conference.
Background
The conference will be held in Sydney from 19-20 April 2016. The program is attached (Attachment A1).
Comments
The focus of the 2016 Urban Transport Australia Conference will be the strategic long term planning of state transport infrastructure in order to accommodate the expected population growth of 30.5 million by 2031. Co-located with the Annual Road and Rail 2016 structures summit, Urban Transport Australia has been designed to gain insight into and address the challenges associated with this population growth, including:
· Strategic long-term planning of sustainable transport networks through the integration of land use planning, urban development and community engagement;
· Addressing urban mobility challenges through innovative utilisation of technology for improving infrastructure; and
· Integrating multi-modal transport for improved customer experience for creating liveable urban centres.
The conference will feature case studies from across Australia and interactive panel discussions to help facilitate discussion on key areas of urban transport development. Specific topics include:
• Gold Coast Light Rail Stage 1 & 2: A Flexible Transport Option to Accommodate Projected Population Growth
• Automated and Connected Vehicle for Improving Road Safety & Quality of Life to Transform Cities
• Community Engagement in Urban Transport Planning for Balancing Long Term Needs of Growing Cities
integrated planning and reporting
Leadership and Governance
Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective |
Delivery Program Term Achievement |
Operational Plan Task |
Council leads the community by advocating, influencing and participating in policy development to the benefit of the local area |
Council actively engages with stakeholders to inform the development of Council’s strategies and plans as appropriate |
Pursue opportunities to contribute to policy development affecting Ku-ring-gai at state and regional levels |
Governance Matters
The Payment of Expenses and Provision of Facilities to Councillors Policy provides for Council to meet the reasonable costs of Councillors attending conferences authorised by resolution of Council.
Risk Management
There are no risk management considerations associated with the recommendation in this report.
Financial Considerations
The costs of attending the conference are (ex. GST):
Conference only, standard rate: $3,699
Conference plus 1 workshop, standard rate: $4,299
Conference plus 2 workshops, standard rate: $4,699
Conference plus 3 workshops, standard rate: $5,099
Conference plus 4 workshop, standard rate: $5,499
Travel and accommodation costs will be additional.
Attendance is provided for in the Councillor’s conference budget in accordance with the Payment of Expenses and Provision of Facilities Policy.
Council has an annual budget of $30,700 for Councillors’ attendance at conferences with $23,633.34 remaining in the 2015/2016 financial year.
Social Considerations
There are no social considerations associated with the recommendation in this report.
Environmental Considerations
There are no environmental considerations associated with the recommendation in this report.
Community Consultation
None undertaken or required.
Internal Consultation
None undertaken or required.
Summary
The 2016 Urban Transport Australia conference will be held in Sydney from 19-20 April 2016. The focus of the conference will be on the strategic long term planning of state transport infrastructure in order to accommodate the expected population growth of 30.5 million by 2031. Co-located with the Annual Road and Rail 2016 structures summit, Urban Transport Australia 2016 will feature case studies from across Australia and interactive panel discussions to help facilitate discussion on key areas of urban transport development.
That any Councillors interested in attending the 2016 Urban Transport Australia conference advise the General Manager by Friday, 25 March 2016.
|
Amber Moloney Manager Records and Governance |
|
2016 Urban Transport Australia Conference Program |
|
2016/011807 |
Ordinary Meeting of Council - 9 February 2016 |
GB.3 / 110 |
|
|
Item GB.3 |
FY00581 |
|
28 January 2016 |
LGMA Councillors' Weekend Seminar - 26-27 February 2016
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
purpose of report: |
To advise Council of the LGMA Councillors’ Weekend Seminar being held in Sydney on 26-27 February 2016. |
|
|
background: |
On request and following on from the success of the Mayor’s Weekend Seminar, this year LGMA are offering a weekend event for Councillors to review the events of 2015 and discuss successes and lessons learned with peers from other councils. |
|
|
comments: |
The weekend will have a practical focus on key skills and knowledge that Councillors have acquired, as well as discussions for 2016 and preparing for an election year. |
|
|
recommendation: |
That any Councillors interested in attending the 2016 LGMA Councillors’ Weekend Seminar advise the General Manager by Monday, 15 February 2016. |
Purpose of Report
To advise Council of the LGMA Councillors’ Weekend Seminar being held in Sydney on 26-27 February 2016.
Background
On request and following on from the success of the Mayor’s Weekend Seminar, this year LGMA are offering a weekend event for Councillors to review the events of 2015 and discuss successes and lessons learned with peers from other councils.
Comments
The weekend will have a practical focus on key skills and knowledge that Councillors have acquired, as well as discussions for 2016 and preparing for an election year. Promoted topics include:
· The changing role of a local government Councillor
· Thinking strategically with IP&R
· Working with your GM and staff
· Engaging with your community
· Principles of good governance
· Understanding the planning system; and
· Preparing for elections.
The program is designed especially for Councillors of NSW Councils or County Councils. Registration is therefore limited to elected members. Councillor weekend participants will receive funding credit towards the Executive Certificate for Elected Members.
The seminar will be held at the Local Government NSW Offices at 28 Margret Street, Sydney.
A list of facilitators and further information can be found in Attachment A1.
integrated planning and reporting
Leadership and Governance
Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective |
Delivery Program Term Achievement |
Operational Plan Task |
Council leads the community by advocating, influencing and participating in policy development to the benefit of the local area |
Council actively engages with stakeholders to inform the development of Council’s strategies and plans as appropriate |
Pursue opportunities to contribute to policy development affecting Ku-ring-gai at state and regional levels
|
Governance Matters
The Payment of Expenses and Provision of Facilities to Councillors Policy provides for Council to meet the reasonable costs of Councillors attending conferences authorised by resolution of Council.
Risk Management
There are no risk management considerations associated with the recommendation in this report.
Financial Considerations
The cost of attending the weekend seminar is $1320 (GST inclusive).
Travel costs will be additional.
Attendance is provided for in the Councillor’s conference budget in accordance with the Payment of Expenses and Provision of Facilities Policy.
Council has an annual budget of $30,700 for Councillors’ attendance at conferences with $23,633.34 remaining in the 2015/2016 financial year.
Social Considerations
There are no social considerations associated with the recommendation in this report.
Environmental Considerations
There are no environmental considerations associated with the recommendation in this report.
Community Consultation
None undertaken or required.
Internal Consultation
None undertaken or required.
Summary
The LGMA Councillors’ Weekend Seminar being held in Sydney on 26-27 February 2016. The program is designed especially for Councillors of NSW Councils or County Councils. Registration is therefore limited to elected members.
A. That any Councillors interested in attending the 2016 LGMA Councillors’ Weekend Seminar advise the General Manager by Monday, 15 February 2016.
|
Amber Moloney Manager Records and Governance |
|
Promotional Material - LGMA Councillors Seminar 2016 |
|
2016/021970 |
Ordinary Meeting of Council - 9 February 2016 |
GB.4 / 115 |
|
|
Item GB.4 |
FY00581 |
|
23 December 2015 |
Local Government NSW Tourism Conference 2016
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
purpose of report: |
To advise Council of the Local Government NSW (LGNSW) 2016 Tourism Conference. |
|
|
background: |
The conference will be co-hosted by Ballina Shire Council and Byron Shire Council from Wednesday, 9 March to Friday, 11 March 2016. |
|
|
comments: |
The theme for the 2016 conference is ‘Embracing a Changing Tourism Landscape’. |
|
|
recommendation: |
That any Councillors interested in attending the LGNSW 2016 Tourism Conference advise the General Manager by Wednesday, 17 February 2016. |
Purpose of Report
To advise Council of the Local Government NSW (LGNSW) 2016 Tourism Conference.
Background
The conference will be co-hosted by Ballina Shire Council and Byron Shire Council from Wednesday, 9 March to Friday, 11 March 2016.The program is attached (Attachment A1).
Comments
The theme for the 2016 conference is ‘Embracing a Changing Tourism Landscape’. The program also includes an optional AVIC summit, which will comprise the following sessions:
· Insights from the “NSW Visitor Information Centre Study” and “Tourist Signposting Research” (proposed)
· Digital marketing session
· Value of community engagement
· Power of signage and taking your tourism message outside the VIC to tourism hotspots.
LGNSW's Tourism Conference gives councillors and council staff the opportunity to meet, listen to experts and peers, and find out how other councils are engaging and managing their tourism industry. The LGNSW website provides the following incentives to attend the conference:
1. The conference is staged by local government for local government
2. Learn from senior industry executives and speakers who are experts in their field
3. Be inspired to create new solutions to your tourism challenges
4. Network with your peers, industry and Destination NSW
5. Take home the latest tourism news, thinking and ideas to share with your team.
The conference is designed for Mayors, Councillors, General Managers and anyone working in or with Local Government whose role involves: tourism promotion and development, economic development, marketing, special events, media, community strategic planning, town planning and cultural services, and infrastructure provision.
integrated planning and reporting
Leadership and Governance
Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective |
Delivery Program Term Achievement |
Operational Plan Task |
Council leads the community by advocating, influencing and participating in policy development to the benefit of the local area |
Council actively engages with stakeholders to inform the development of Council’s strategies and plans as appropriate |
Pursue opportunities to contribute to policy development affecting Ku-ring-gai at state and regional levels |
Governance Matters
The Payment of Expenses and Provision of Facilities to Councillors Policy provides for Council to meet the reasonable costs of Councillors attending conferences authorised by resolution of Council.
Risk Management
There are no risk management considerations associated with the recommendation in this report.
Financial Considerations
The costs of attending the conference are (incl. GST):
Conference registration, standard rate (by Monday 22 February 2016): $693
Group registration, standard rate (by Monday 22 February 2016): - $1,980
Day Registration: $330 for Thursday and $220 for Friday
AVIC optional summit (Wednesday): $120
Conference registration standard rate with AVIC summit (50% discount for summit): $753
Travel and accommodation costs will be additional.
Attendance is provided for in the Councillor’s conference budget in accordance with the Payment of Expenses and Provision of Facilities Policy.
Council has an annual budget of $30,700 for Councillors’ attendance at conferences with $23,633.34 remaining in the 2015/2016 financial year.
Social Considerations
There are no social considerations associated with the recommendation in this report.
Environmental Considerations
There are no environmental considerations associated with the recommendation in this report.
Community Consultation
None undertaken or required.
Internal Consultation
None undertaken or required.
Summary
The LGNSW Tourism annual conference will be co-hosted by Ballina Shire Council and Byron Shire Council from Wednesday, 9 March to Friday, 11 March 2016. The theme for the 2016 conference is ‘Embracing a Changing Tourism Landscape’.
The conference is designed for Mayors, Councillors, General Managers and anyone working in or with Local Government whose role involves: tourism promotion and development, economic development, marketing, special events, media, community strategic planning, town planning and cultural services, and infrastructure provision.
That any Councillors interested in attending the LGNSW 2016 Tourism Conference advise the General Manager by Wednesday, 17 February 2016. |
Amber Moloney Manager Records and Governance |
|
Local Government NSW Tourism Conference 2016 - Program |
|
2015/343576 |
Ordinary Meeting of Council - 9 February 2016 |
GB.5 / 124 |
|
|
Item GB.5 |
DA0380/15 |
|
12 January 2016 |
development application
Summary Sheet
Report title: |
DA0380/15 - demolition of existing structures and construction of a 3 storey residential flat building containing 8 units |
ITEM/AGENDA NO: |
GB.5 |
Application No: |
DA0380/15 |
Property Details: |
15 Turramurra Avenue, Turramurra Lot & DP No: Lot 8, DP 21174 Site area (m2): 1524 m2 Zoning: R4 |
Ward: |
|
Proposal/Purpose: |
Demolition of existing structures and construction of a 3 storey residential flat building containing 8 units
|
Type of Consent: |
Local |
Applicant: |
Pix Projects Pty Ltd |
Owner: |
G & K Hercus |
Date Lodged: |
2 September 2015 |
Recommendation: |
Approval
|
Purpose of Report
The purpose of this report is to determine DA0380/15, which is reported to Council (and not the JRPP) as the proposed development is a residential flat development with a capital investment value (CIV) of less than $20 million.
integrated planning and reporting
PLACES, SPACES & INFASTRUCTURE
Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective |
Delivery Program Term Achievement |
Operational Plan Task |
P2.1 A robust planning framework is in place to deliver quality design outcomes and maintain the identity and character of Ku-ring-gai
|
Applications are assessed in accordance with State and local plans
|
Assessments are of high quality, accurate and consider all relevant legislative requirements
|
Executive Summary
Issues: Setbacks
Submissions: 4 objections
Land and Environment Court: N/A
Recommendation: Approval
History
Pre-DA
A Pre-DA consultation was held between Council officers and the applicant on 11 June 2015. The Pre-DA discussions were generally supportive of the proposed development, noting that conceptual drawings were tabled. However, the following issues were identified:
- solar access
- building separation
- heritage interface to the adjoining heritage item
- stormwater
It is noted that the Pre-DA consultation occurred prior to the recent changes to SEPP No. 65 and the proposal at that time was not considered against the new NSW Apartment Design Guide.
DA history
2 September 2015 application lodged
16 September 2015 to 19 October 2015 application notified
10 November 2015 preliminary assessment letter issued to applicant
17 November 2015 meeting with applicant to discuss issues
30 November 2015 conceptual amendments submitted to Council
8 December 2015 amended plans formally submitted to Council
The Site
Site description
The site is located on the low, eastern, side of Turrumurra Avenue, to the south of its intersection with Wonga Wonga Street.
The site is a rectangular shaped allotment and has an area of 1524m2, with dimensions of 29.345m x 52.425m. The site contains a detached single storey dwelling house, detached carport and landscaped gardens.
Surrounding development
Surrounding development is of varying scale and density, typical of an area undergoing urban consolidation.
To the north and east, are sites containing single dwellings, many of which either have consent for redevelopment or are subject of a current DA. To the south, are single dwellings and on the corner of Nulla Nulla Street (2 Nulla Nulla Street) is a heritage item. To the west, at 20 – 28 Turramurra Avenue is a five storey residential flat development.
The Proposal
The proposal is to demolish the existing dwelling and carport and construct a three storey residential flat building comprising:
· basement car parking for 17 vehicles, bicycle parking, waste areas and storage
· three storeys of residential development, comprising 7 x 3 bedroom units and 1 x 2 bedroom unit
· comprehensive landscaping
Consultation
Community
In accordance with the notification requirements of the Ku-ring-gai Local Centres DCP, owners of surrounding properties were given notice of the application. In response, Council received submissions from the following:
1. D & P Sandoe – 301/20 Turramurra Avenue, Turramurra
2. Sam Oh – 2-4 Nulla Nulla Street, Turramurra
3. Brain Symons – 6 Nulla Nulla Street, Turramurra
4. Andrew Smith – 8 Nulla Nulla Street
The submissions raised the following issues:
The proposal provides for limited visitor parking and inadequate provisions for tradespeople.
The proposed development provides for the required amount of visitor parking specified in the DCP and overall an amount of car parking that exceeds the minimum requirements of the DCP.
Turramurra Avenue is parked out with commuter parking during the working week due to unrestricted parking. This creates significant issues for deliveries and service vehicles associated with this and adjoining flat developments. Consideration of parking restrictions is necessary.
Notwithstanding commutor street parking, Council’s development engineer is satisfied that the development is satisfactory in this regard.
The local road network is a known ‘rat run’ and further development will increase the likelihood of a major incident.
Council’s Development Engineer has considered the proposal, including the applicant’s traffic report, and is satisfied that the development will not create an unsafe traffic environment.
There is a considerable fall to the rear of the site. This land fall, together with the height of the building, creates significant privacy issues to the east.
The scale of the development, combined with the setback to the eastern boundary and screen planting sufficiently ameliorates the impact of building bulk, & privacy impacts towards the east.
Overlooking from balconies at the rear of the building could be ameliorated by the introduction of sliding screens.
Sliding screens as suggested within the submission are not considered necessary, given the compliant rear setback and the retention of the existing large screening hedge. These elements will limit overlooking.
The rear retaining walls on the boundary with fencing atop is excessive and aesthetically unpleasing from adjoining properties to the east. The existing scale of boundary fencing should be retained, along with screen planting.
The subject retaining wall was deleted in the amended scheme, with the existing retaining wall, boundary fence and screen planting at the rear to remain.
Within Council
Engineering
Council’s Development Engineer commented on the proposal as follows:
Stormwater disposal
The subject site falls from the south western corner at the street frontage towards the north eastern corner where the site benefits from an existing easement to drain water 1.0m wide over 17 Turramurra Avenue and 3 Wonga Wonga Street.
In addition, the terms of the easement to which the connection is proposed confirms the property has the legal right to drain through to the Council pipe which is also identified as a Category 3(a) Riparian Zone. The design engineer has submitted a survey of the proposed easement route to Council’s existing drainage system and a detailed design, including longitudinal section for the pipe which verifies that the existing 225mm diameter pipe within the easement has sufficient hydraulic capacity.
The stormwater plans shows a combined on-site detention and retention tank comprising 34.4m3 and 15,000L of storage respectively located under the driveway area.
The rainwater retention and re-use has met the BASIX commitments, and satisfied the 50% reduction in runoff days (79% reduction achieved) required under Volume C Part 4B.3 of the DCP. The sizing of the on-site detention volume has also satisfied the requirements described in Volume C Part 4B.5 of the DCP with an offset of 10% allowed for rainwater re-use which is to be plumbed to toilet and garden irrigation. The design of the OSD system also provides a freeboard of 800mm from the top water level to the habitable finished floor levels of the development which is more than adequate.
A pump-out system with storage capacity of 16.5m3 has been provided within the basement carpark to drain the basement subsoil drainage and driveway. It has been designed to have the rising main discharge to the rear boundary pit.
The BASIX commitments detail re-use of stored rainwater for irrigation of 467sq.m of common landscaped areas and for 1 car wash bay. A central rainwater tank of 10m3 is proposed which satisfies the water commitments.
A water quality model (MUSIC Modelling) has been submitted to improve stormwater runoff quality from the subject site. The design has provided grass swales, a proprietary gross pollutant trap (GPT) ‘StormFilter (Stormwater360) within OSD chamber and Enviropods within all surface runoff collection pits located downstream of the detention system to capture litter, debris and other pollutants prior to connection into Council’s public drainage system. The stormwater treatment standards / targets outlined in Council’s Local Centres DCP Volume C Clause 4B.6 would be achieved by the proposed treatment train.
The Stormwater Management & Civil Engineering Plans DA1.01/2, 1.02/2, 2.01/2, 2.02/2, 3.01/4, 3.02/5, 4.01/2, 4.02/2, 4.03/2 prepared by Northrop and accompanying Report - Job No. S150559, dated 17 August 2015 is acceptable.
Traffic generation
According to the traffic generation rates nominated by The Roads & Maritime Services (RMS) ‘Guide to Traffic Generating Developments’, the development would generate approximately 3-5 peak hour vehicle trips which would represent one vehicle trip every 12 minutes during the peak hour. According to the above guidelines, the vehicle trips is considered to be very low traffic generation. The increase in traffic flows in Turramurra Avenue is not expected to have a significant effect on traffic flows or on the operation of the intersection with the arterial road network.
Vehicular access and accommodation arrangements
The site is zoned ‘R3’ under the Local Centres LEP. The parking provisions have been determined using Ku-ring-gai Council Local Centres Development Control Plan for multi-dwelling housing. The site is located greater than 400m walking distance from the Turramurra Railway Station. The following parking provisions have been adopted:
Ku-ring-gai Council Local Centres DCP Volume C Clause 2R.2 ‘Car Parking Rates’
Multi-Dwelling Housing |
Parking Space Requirement |
1 bedroom unit |
1 space per unit |
2 bedroom unit |
1.25 space per unit |
3 bedroom unit |
1.5 spaces per unit |
Visitor car spaces |
1 space per 4 units |
8 x 3 bedrooms = 8 x 1.5 spaces/unit = 12 spaces
8 dwellings - visitor space/4 dwellings = 2 visitor spaces
Total parking spaces required = 14 spaces
The development proposes 17 off-street parking spaces, comprising 15 residents’ spaces (includes1 adaptable space) and 2 visitor spaces.
Vehicular access to the car parking facility is to be provided via a new 3.5m wide entry / exit driveway crossing which widens internally from the ramp down from 5.7m to 3.5 at the basement entry level. The driveway clear width satisfied the requirements of Volume C Clause 2.2 of the DCP as well as providing for a car waiting bay which has sufficient passing area for two-way traffic flow.
A temporary service /car wash bay space has been provided which can also be used as a visitor space. The minimum dimension of 3.5m x 6m has been satisfied.
The driveway gradients comply with Australian Standard 2890.1 (2004) “Off-Street car parking” as do the dimensions of the parking bay, ramp grades and aisle widths. The adaptable parking space width complies with AS2890.6 (2009) which is also referenced by the Access Consultant.
Waste collection
The development allows a garbage truck to enter and depart the garbage recycle storage area in a forward direction. The driveway grades and turning manoeuvrability are suitable for the small waste collection vehicle as shown by the swept paths within the Appendix of the Traffic Report.
A clear head height of 2.6m depicted on the South-Elevation Plan has been provided to access the basement area and also provided over the travel path of the waste service vehicle.
The proposed 9x240L bins for waste, paper and recycling satisfies the minimum bin requirements.
The requirements as per Volume C Part 3.4 of the Local Centres DCP have been satisfied.
Construction management
An indicative construction traffic management plan (CTMP) for both the demolition and excavation stages have been submitted which is acceptable for DA purposes. The plans show a Medium Rigid Vehicle (MRV) of 8.8m entering the site utilising existing driveway with the a new driveway on the southern end property frontage to exit the site. For tree protection purposes, the use of the existing driveway and crossing for construction access is encouraged.
Based on the scale of works and expected construction vehicle movements, a detailed construction traffic management plan (CTMP) must be submitted for review by Council Engineers prior to the commencement of any works on site. (Condition 8)
The CTMP would also need to show turning path diagrams demonstrating how construction vehicles for all stages of development will turn out of the site without crossing over the existing speed hump in Turramurra Avenue.
The submitted CTMP shows a Work Zone to be provided for the set down and pick up of materials and not for the parking of private vehicles associated with the site. A work zone will be required for the site frontage. (Condition 9)
Geotechnical investigation
A desktop study of previous geotechnical investigations carried out in the immediate vicinities has been used which included the most relevant geotechnical investigation of 15-19 Turramurra Avenue. The investigation identified subsurface conditions comprising surficial fill over residual silty clays then weathered shale bedrock at moderate depths in the range of 8.5m and 6.8m in the borehole tests. Groundwater was measured in both the boreholes at depths 6.6m and 8m, respectively.
The geotechnical report recommends that a hydrological investigation of the site be carried out to provide information for estimation of groundwater inflow rates into the excavation. Standpipes are also recommended to be installed into the boreholes to allow for future groundwater monitoring.
The report suggests a dilapidation report is to be submitted to include a survey of adjoining buildings to the north and south. (Condition 47)
All other recommendations during the construction phase shall be carried out as specified within the report. It is also recommended that further geotechnical input be required in particular to groundwater monitoring. (Condition 46)
Conclusion
From an engineering perspective the proposal is satisfactory.
Landscaping
Council’s Landscape Assessment Officer commented on the proposal as follows:
Preservation of trees or vegetation - Clause 5.9, KLEP; Cl 1.3 Volume C Ku-ring-gai Local Centres DCP
An arboricultural assessment, prepared by Stuart Pittendrigh, dated August 2015, has been submitted with the application. Tree numbers refer to this report.
Trees to be removed
Tree 5/ Phoenix canariensis (Canary Island Palm) The tree is located on the northern boundary of the site. The tree is a visually prominent specimen in good condition. It was identified in the Pre DA consultation as important to be retained. The tree is to be transplanted. (Condition 20).
There is no landscape objection to the removal of the trees on site of low landscape significance (Trees1 & 3) or that are located within the reasonable building footprint of this permitted land use (Tree 4).
There is no objection to the removal of the following tree as it is exempt under Section 13.2 Part 13 Volume A Ku-ring-gai Local Centres DCP - Tree 9.
Street trees to be removed
Tree 10/ Jacaranda mimosifolia (Jacaranda) This small tree is located on the nature strip. There is no landscape objection to its removal. A replacement tree is proposed on the landscape plan.
Significant trees to be retained
Tree 6/ Lagerstroemia indica (Crepe Myrtle) The tree is located on the northern boundary of the site. The impacts are considered acceptable.
Tree 7/ Brachychiton acerifolius (Flame Tree) The tree is located on the eastern boundary of the site, within the adjoining property. The impacts are considered acceptable.
Tree 8/ Corymbia citriodora (Lemon Scented Gum) The tree is located on the eastern boundary of the site, within the adjoining property. The impacts are considered acceptable.
Landscape plan
Communal open space – Cl 7C.1 Volume A Ku-ring-gai Local Centres DCP
The development has an area of communal open space, including a small area located along the rear southern boundary and a larger area in the front setback of the site. To provide a reasonable area of communal open space that is set behind the building, an additional area of lawn, minimum 3m x7m is to be provided at the tennis court level directly adjacent the steps to the upper lawn area (Condition 20).
Private Open Space - Cl 7C.2 Volume A Ku-ring-gai Local Centres DCP
The private open space at ground level provides a compliant minimum area of 15m2 and a minimum depth of 3 metres (Objective 4E-1ADG 2015).
Deep soil calculation (Part 7A.4 Volume A Ku-ring-gai (Local Centres) DCP)
Site area is 1524m2.
Where site area is less than 1800m2, a minimum of 40% (609m2) of the site is to be deep soil landscape area as per definition in KLEP DCP. The proposed deep soil area is a compliant 42.9% (655m2) of the site area.
Areas to be excluded,
Existing and proposed retaining walls
Excluding the above areas, the proposal will comply with the minimum deep soil zone requirement.
Screen planting
Northern boundary – Camellia sasanqua (Chinese Camellia) (3m), Michelia figo (Port Wine Magnolia) (3m), and Viburnum tinus (Viburnum) (3m). The proposed entrance paving provides nil setback for screen planting. To achieve landscape objectives, the paving and privacy screen are to be setback minimum 800mm from the boundary in line with the proposed screening to the entry path by condition. An additional 4 Camellia sasanqua (Chinese Camellia) are to be provided within this setback (Condition 20).
Southern boundary – Michelia figo (Port Wine Magnolia) (3m), Viburnum tinus (Viburnum) (3m).
Eastern boundary – The proposal indicates the retention of existing mature Viburnum tinus (Viburnum) hedge (approx. 3m).
Tree replenishment
A minimum of 5 trees are required for the site. The proposed canopy tree plantings, in addition to existing trees that are being retained, are in excess of this number.
BASIX
Common area landscape
The BASIX Certificate indicates that there is no common area landscape area nominated to be indigenous/low water use species.
Individual units
The BASIX Certificate accurately reflects the proposed development.
Stormwater plan
The existing sandstone wall is to be retained as per the landscape plan. The stormwater plan is also to be amended to be in accordance with the approved plans (Condition 21). The proposed stormwater line is to be relocated to avoid the existing sandstone wall and be relocated closer to the building (Condition 21). Swales are to be relocated and excavated by hand under arborist supervision within tree protection zones to avoid impacts on tree roots (Condition 21).
Conclusion
The proposal is supported
Urban design:
Council’s Urban Design Consultant is generally supportive of the application and the detailed assessment forms Attachment 13.
Planning comment:
Comment has been made by Council’s Urban Design Consultant concerning the proposed development and its interface with the adjoining lower zoned properties to the rear (east) and side (southern) boundaries. It has been noted within the discussions of Principle 1 that the proposal does not provide an additional 3m setback from the building to the rear and side southern boundaries where it adjoins a lower density zone.
Objective 3F-1 within the Apartment Design Guide provides that residential flat buildings should have an increased separation distance of 3m when adjacent to a different zone that permits a lower density residential development. This is to provide for a transition in scale and opportunity for increased landscaping. The intent of the design guidance is to provide an additional separation between buildings of the lower density on adjoining sites
The proposal otherwise satisfies the intent of the control by complying with Council’s zone interface setback, which rather than provide an additional distance of 3m for separation between a proposed residential flat building and dwelling(s) within the lower density zone, requires a greater setback to the boundary. The development for its scale complies with the DCP zone interface control.
It is noted that the development at the rear or east adjoins land zoned R3 that is currently occupied by a single dwelling. Should that site be developed for medium density development (permitted within the zone), any future development would require at its very minimum a 3m setback to the common boundary. For these reasons the development is considered acceptable with Objective 3F-1. To the southern or side boundary, the site adjoins land zoned R2. Despite being inconsistent with the suggested zone interface control of the ADG, it meets and exceeds the heritage setbacks required by Council’s DCP, and is therefore assessed as being satisfactory.
Heritage:
Council’s Heritage Advisor commented on the proposal as follows:
Heritage status
The site does not contain a heritage item and is not within a HCA but adjoins a heritage item at No 2 Nulla Nulla Street and is within the general vicinity of a heritage item at 10 Turramurra Avenue (Uniting Church and Manse). There is an item at No 40 Turramurra Avenue (timber cottage) and at 1247 Pacific Highway (Masonic Temple) but they are outside the visual setting of the site.
In relation to heritage the objectives in the LEP are:
· to conserve the environmental heritage of Ku-ring-gai
· to conserve the heritage significance of heritage items and heritage conservation areas, including associated fabric, settings and views
· to conserve archaeological sites
· to conserve Aboriginal objects and Aboriginal place of heritage significance
Clause 5.10 (4) of the Local Centres LEP requires Council to consider the effects of the proposed development on the heritage significance of the heritage item concerned and Clause (5) of the LEP allows Council to require a heritage management document to be prepared that assesses the extent to which carrying out the proposed development would affect the heritage significance of heritage items concerned.
Demolition of existing house
The existing house on the site may have a level of aesthetic or historic significance as part of the earlier development of the area but has not been identified as having individual heritage significance to warrant listing and is not included within a HCA. It is considered unlikely that the site contains relics as the existing development appears to be the original residential development on the site.
As Council has rezoned the site for medium density development, demolition of the house was anticipated and there is no heritage objection to demolition.
Background
The adjoining heritage item located on the corner of Turramurra Avenue and Nulla Nulla Street is a Federation period house set on a relatively large site. When listed (1989) it was substantially intact but has been altered with a large addition on its northern side (Turramurra Avenue elevation) with lower level garage in a style consistent with the original portion of the dwelling. The additions are identifiable on close inspection and do not adversely impact on its heritage significance.
The area was subdivided in 1897 as part of the Brodie Estate. Lot 34 from the 1897 subdivision was re-subdivided in 1917 forming the subject site at 15 Turramurra Avenue. It is presumed that the house at 2 Nulla Nulla was constructed by 1917 and the house at No 15 Turramurra Avenue was built after 1917. The 1943 aerial photograph shows the adjoining item with its tennis court however it appears there was substantial tree screening between it and the subject site at No 15 Turramurra Avenue. It also appears there was substantial tree screening along the Turramurra Avenue frontage. The front garden of No 2 Nulla Nulla Street appears to be largely grassed with shrubs along its front boundary.
The principle view of the item is from Nulla Nulla Street and it remains largely similar in appearance before the additions/alterations were undertaken. It is understood the front fence along Nulla Nulla Street and Turramurra Avenue are recent, possibly undertaken with the additions and alterations about 20 years ago. The house now presents to Nulla Nulla Street screened by mature landscaping and hedging. The recent additions and alterations to the heritage item include a large basement level carpark accessed from Turramurra Avenue and a pool close to the boundary with the subject site.
Heritage management document
The applicant has submitted a Statement of Heritage Impact prepared by an experienced heritage consultant. It is prepared in accordance with the NSW Heritage Council guidelines for such a report. It includes the following design statement from the architects for the proposed development:
Context and neighbourhood character
The proposal responds to its context in two fundamental ways:
a) by providing a landscape design, which enhances the existing streetscape, and which screens the building; and
b) by acknowledging the site and zone opportunities in a residential building of contemporary design fully compliant with Council's controls.
This corner site presents a unique opportunity to provide a building with generous setbacks and curtilages offering a contemporary, contextual presence to the streetscape. The zoning controls enable a re-ordering of neighbourhoods near established centres. The proposal seeks to make a positive contribution to the desired future character of the area.
Built form and scale
The proposed building is generated by the envelope controls in that instance, and then refined by bulk and scale considerations in relation to the surrounding sites. The proposal represents a significant shift of scale from the existing low-density uses, however, it derives its scale from a wider consideration of the local built environment, the proximity to the Turramurra Shopping Centre and the dominant nature of the tree canopy of the area.
Landscape
The landscape design forms a critical part of the contextual design response of this proposal to the area. The buildings are not seen in isolation from the landscaping. The landscaping 'knits' the building into its context, softens building lines, provides a 'green' buffer and enhances the amenity and visual appeal of the proposal.
The siting of the building and the generous setbacks which allow for significant areas of screen planting optimise the useability of the site, the privacy for the owners and guests, respect of the neighbours privacy and amenity.
The backdrop of the existing significant trees and the proposal of additional plantings will allow for the existing continuous canopies of this site and those adjoining to be linked.
The building will nestle comfortably within the canopy of the existing trees.
Aesthetics
The proposal sits comfortably in its location, surrounded by a landscape of tall trees (new and existing) under storey planting and turfed grounds. The design is a contemporary architecture of clean, legible forms overlaid with animating elements such as balconies, sunscreens and pergolas. Colours and materials have been selected to complement the existing context colours and animate the facade. The colour and material palette is fresh and non-dominant - forming a backdrop to the extensive swathe of landscape which surrounds the building. It readily acknowledges the adjoining Heritage item to the South
With regard to the standard questions for a HIS the report states the impact of the proposed new development is minimised by the following:
(i) The proposed development complies with the aims and objectives as well as the development guidelines for buildings of this type in the immediate proximity of a heritage item. Notwithstanding, the portion of the heritage item adjoining the subject site has no heritage value, the development has provides separation and compatibility of materials as well as appropriate landscape screening to maintain the setting and visual character of the item when viewed from the public domain.
(ii) The proposal has adopted a design form that promotes breaking down the overall massing of the building into smaller vertical panels with facade setbacks provided to the principal facades.
(iii) The use of a combination of vertical and horizontal proportions on the proposed street frontage and the breaking up of its overall bulk into smaller portions is achieved by the means of vertical divisions, well-articulated fenestration, step back to the top floor from the main building face and in the use of contrasting solid and transparent treatments and the use of varied materials.
(iv) The proposal avoids traditional detailing in order to reinforce the distinct identity and aesthetic character of the adjacent heritage item and other heritage items in the vicinity.
The report concludes that:
The proposed development responds appropriately to the current and desired future character of the precinct in accordance with the Ku-ring-gai Council Local Centres LEP and DCP requirements for increased urban density on the site;
Any impacts on the adjoining house at No.2 Nulla Nulla Street are acceptable in regards to the Council’s rezoning of the site and compliance with the numerical and objective requirements of the LEP and development guidelines of the DCP. The separation and retention of landscape elements assists this relationship;
The relationship of the proposed development to the Turramurra Uniting Church Centre will result in no significant detrimental impact on the heritage values ascribed to that complex or its prominence as a cultural landmark in the immediate area;
Local Centres DCP
Council has prepared specific design objectives and design controls for medium density development within the vicinity of heritage items or HCAs.
7.3 DEVELOPMENT IN THE VICINITY OF A HERITAGE ITEM |
|
Development Control |
Complies |
General |
|
1 Development in the vicinity of a heritage item is to be sympathetic to the heritage item having regard to form, proportions, materials and colours, siting and orientation; setting and context and streetscape patterns |
No |
2 An applicant’s Statement of Environmental Effects or Heritage Impact Statement must discuss the effect that the proposed development will have on a heritage item, including its garden. |
Yes |
3 Significant views to and from heritage items are to be protected. |
Yes |
4 Development in the vicinity of a heritage item must respect the curtilage and setting of that item. |
Partially |
5 An application for development in the vicinity of a heritage item must demonstrate that the construction process will not result in damage to the heritage item or its setting. |
Yes |
Residential Context |
|
New development adjacent to a heritage item must comply with the following: iii) must have a minimum 12m building separation to the heritage, iv) must not exceed a facade height of 8m from existing ground level; v) any building mass above 8m high from existing ground level must be stepped back an additional 6m from the heritage item; vi) front setbacks must be at least 2m more than the front setback of the adjoining heritage item, for that portion of the new building whose height exceeds the height of the heritage item. vii) where variations in setbacks exist the larger setback will apply; viii) any new development must have a maximum 36m wall length to any boundary. |
Yes Yes Yes
Yes
N/A Yes |
7 Screen planting on side and rear boundaries adjoining a heritage item site is to achieve a minimum mature height of 4m |
Yes |
8 Front and side fences are to be no higher than the fence of the adjoining heritage item. Front fences must be open and transparent such a timber picket or metal palisade. Side fences are to be timber. |
No |
Comments on compliance with table 7.3 of DCP
· Development in the vicinity of a heritage item is to be sympathetic to the heritage item having regard to form, proportions, materials and colours, siting and orientation; setting and context and streetscape patterns
Response
The proposed development is a contemporary form and does not draw its character from the adjoining heritage item which is a Federation period building with a large addition on its northern side which adjoins the subject site. It is considred that a contemporary architectural style is more appropriate and it is generally sympathetic to the heritage item because it maintains a suitable separation and the future landscape screening will assist in providing visual separation.
The colours and materials are generally consistent with the adjoining heritage item and comprised of face brickwork, stone facing, some rendered and painted elements and metal louvers. The proposed building is generally recessive in the context. The three storey scale of the proposed development with a generally flat roof form also assists in reducing visual impacts on the adjoining heritage item.
The siting of the building addresses Turramurra Avenue with its side elevation to the heritage item. The main front of the heritage item faces Nulla Nulla Street. The part of the item that faces the development site is technically a rear elevation and part of a major addition that was constructed approximately 20 years ago. From the Nulla Nulla Street elevation, the proposed development would be seen in the background.
· Development in the vicinity of a heritage item must respect the curtilage and setting of the HCA;
Response
The legal curtilage of the heritage item is its current lot. In the existing context, the visual setting extends to the house on the development site as it is of a similar architectural period and slightly lower scale. However, the site has been rezoned and the proposed development is 3 storeys in scale and assists in minimising the impact of the development on its curtilage and setting.
· Front and side fences are to be no higher than the fence of the adjoining heritage item. Front fences must be open and transparent such a timber picket or metal palisade. Side fences are to be timber.
Response
There is an existing stone retaining wall on the heritage item, close to the existing pool and an established hedge. Further to the west, there is a low concrete retaining wall and a timber fence along the boundary with No 15 Turramurra Avenue.
The site plan for the development indicates a 1.8m high metal palisade type fence from the Turramurra Avenue frontage along the northern side boundary of the item, however no other detail is shown. The SEE indicates a 1.2m high palisade type fence on the Turramurra Avenue frontage but it is not indicated in any drawings. Currently there is no front fence to the house at No 15 Turramurra Avenue but there is a low masonry edge located along its Turramurra Avenue frontage.
Comments
Considering the rezoning of the site, the proposed development is considered to have relatively low impacts on the adjoining heritage item which is located in Nulla Nulla Street.
Potential impacts from the proposed development on the other heritage items in the area and considered to be negligible.
The colours proposed for the building are compatible to the adjoining heritage items and with the proposed landscaping would assist in mitigating any adverse impact on the adjoining item.
Conclusion
Demolition of the existing house is acceptable, provided photographic archival recording is undertaken before any works commence. Due to the possibility of below ground deposits or relics on the site, an archaeological condition is recommended (Condition 72) to ensure any discoveries are appropriately managed.
The proposed development will have relatively low impacts on the adjoining heritage item (located in Nulla Nulla Avenue) and is acceptable. The proposed development will also have negligible impacts on other nearby heritage items.
Statutory Provisions
The proposal is “Local Development” under Part 4 of the EP&A Act, 1979 and requires development consent.
The provisions of Section 79C(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979 (as amended) determine the matters for consideration in assessing a development application as stated below:
(a) The provisions of:
(i) any environmental planning instrument, and
(ii) any proposed instrument that is or has been the subject of public consultation under this Act and that has been notified to the consent authority (unless the Director General has notified the consent authority that the making of the proposed instrument has been deferred indefinitely or has not been approved), and
(iii) any development control plan; and
(iv) any planning agreement that has been entered into under section 93F, or any draft planning agreement that a developer has offered to enter into under section 93F, and
(v) the regulations (to the extent that they prescribe matters for the purposes of this paragraph), and
(vi) any coastal zone management plan (within the meaning of the Coastal Protection Act 1979), that apply to the land to which the development application relates.
(b) the likely impacts of that development, including environmental impacts on both the natural and built environments, and social and economic impacts in the locality,
(c) the suitability of the site for the development,
(d) any submissions made in accordance with this Act or the regulations,
(e) the public interest.
The relevant provisions of environmental planning instruments, proposed instruments, DCPs, the regulations and policies are addressed in the following sections of this report. The likely impacts, suitability of the site and public interest are also addressed below and the submissions received have previously been addressed. The proposed development is not subject of any planning agreements
Sydney Regional Environmental Planning Policy (Sydney Harbour Catchment) 2005
SREP 2005 applies to the site as the site is located in the Sydney Harbour Catchment. The Planning Principles in Part 2 of the SREP must be considered in the preparation of environmental planning instruments, development control plans, environmental studies and master plans. The proposal is not affected by the provisions of the SREP which relate to the assessment of development applications as the site is not located in the Foreshores and Waterways Area as defined by the Foreshores and Waterways Area Map.
State Environmental Planning Policy No. 55 - Remediation of Land
The provisions of SEPP 55 require consideration of the potential for a site to be contaminated. The site has a history of residential use and is unlikely to be contaminated. Further investigation is not warranted.
State Environmental Planning Policy (Building Sustainability Index: BASIX) 2004
An amended BASIX certificate was submitted with the amended plans. The application documentation is consistent with the commitments identified in the BASIX certificate.
State Environmental Planning Policy No 65-Design Quality of Residential Flat Development
SEPP 65 aims to improve the design quality of residential flat buildings across New South Wales and to provide an assessment framework and design code for assessing “good design”.
A Design Verification Statement, has been submitted with the application in accordance with clause 50(1A) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000.
The application has been assessed by Council’s Urban Design Consultant and is considered to be acceptable.
Part 2 of the SEPP sets out design principles against which design review panels and consent authorities may evaluate the merits of a design. The proposal has been assessed against the SEPP 65 design principles (Attachment 13) and it’s associated Apartment Design Guide (ADG) in Attachment 14. The proposal complies with all but the visual privacy (zone interface) control of the ADG:
Objective 3F.1 – Visual Privacy
As discussed elsewhere within this report, the proposed development seeks to depart from the recommended additional setback to a boundary where that boundary shares a common boundary with the lower density R2 and R3 zones, which in this case is the rear, eastern boundary and southern side boundary.
With the design guidance section of Objective 3F.1 the following control is provided:
Apartment buildings should have an increased separation distance of 3m (in addition to the requirements set out in design criteria 1) when adjacent to a different zone that permits lower density residential development to provide for a transition in scale and increased landscaping.
This control is similar to Council’s zone interface control within its DCP, with the difference being that the increase setback is provided to all levels rather that to Level 4 and above as provided within Council’s controls.
Whilst the development departs from the guidance of the Apartment Design Guide at the zone interface it is nonetheless acceptable for the following reasons:
(i) The development satisfies Council zone interface controls, with the ADG control providing guidance where there is an absence of a separate Council control / standard.
(ii) The development site in constrained in so far that to the side, southern boundary is land zoned R2 containing a heritage item. The development complies with Council’s building separation controls for new development and heritage items, which is a minimum of 12m. This building separation is more than that envisaged by the ADG control and when applied, restricts the available building envelope.
(iii) Were an increased setback to the rear and southern side boundary pursued, it would push the building closer to the street, which is undesirable from a streetscape perspective, but also to the northern side boundary, creating building separation issues with the residential flat building at 17 Turramurra Avenue. Further, that building would overshadow the proposed development, creating solar access issues into the proposed development.
(iv) The proposal is for a 3 storey residential flat building. To the rear on the land zone R3, development of a height and scale of 3 storeys in the form of multi-dwelling medium density development could be undertaken. The consistency of scale between the two developments minimises the impact upon the built form.
(v) The development has been designed to minimise overlooking, particular to the rear, with balconies recessed an screen planting integrated into the landscaping scheme.
(vi) To the departure is only limited to the ground and first floor, with the top most floor complying with the ADG 9m separation to the boundary.
For these reasons, the proposal on merit is assessed as satisfying Objective 3F-1 of the ADG, despite being inconsistent with the prescribed design guidance.
Ku-ring-gai LEP (Local Centres) 2012
Zoning and permissibility:
The site is zoned R4 High Density Residential. The proposed development is defined as a residential flat building and is permissible in the zone.
Residential zone objectives:
The development:
· provides increased housing choice (including adaptable dwellings) in proximity to public transport
· complies with deep soil landscaping requirements and includes a landscape strategy which provides for the protection of existing trees and enhancement of the landscaped character of the area
· achieves a high level of residential amenity through a high standard of building and landscape design
· will be energy and water efficient through compliance with BASIX requirements
· has a rear garden adjacent to a rear garden of another property
· has an onsite detention system to minimise impact on downstream waterways
· has a basement car park with dedicated storage areas for waste, household items and bicycles
The development is therefore consistent with the objectives of the R4 High Density Residential zone.
Development standards:
Development standard |
Proposed |
Complies |
Building height: 11.5m |
<11.5m |
YES |
Minimum street frontage: 24m |
29.54m |
YES |
Floor space ratio: 0.8:1 |
0.8: |
YES |
Minimum allotment size: 1200m2 |
1524m2 |
YES |
5.9 Preservation of trees or vegetation:
Clause 5.9 requires that a person must not ringbark, cut down, top, lop, remove, injure or wilfully destroy any tree without the authority conferred by a development consent or permit. Council’s Landscape and Tree Assessment Officer has advised that the proposed tree removal is acceptable.
5.10 Heritage conservation:
The provisions of clause 5.10 apply to development that relates to a heritage item or is located in the vicinity of a heritage item or within a heritage conservation area. Council’s Heritage Advisor has considered the objectives of clause 5.10 and advised that the proposal will have an acceptable impact on the heritage significance of the heritage item within the vicinity of the proposed development.
6.1 Earthworks:
The proposed development includes earthworks to the subject site including partial site regarding and excavation associated with the building’s basement.
Pursuant of the considerations prompted by Clause 6.1, the proposed development is assessed as being satisfactory.
6.2 Stormwater and water sensitive urban design:
The proposed development has been accompanied by a detailed stormwater plan and consistent with the comments of Council’s Development Engineer elsewhere in this report, the proposed development is assessed as being satisfactory.
6.5 Site requirements for multi dwelling housing and residential flat buildings:
The proposed development meets and exceeds the prescribed site requirements for residential flat buildings.
Ku-ring-gai Local Centres Development Control Plan
COMPLIANCE TABLE |
||
Development control |
Proposed |
Complies |
Volume A |
||
Part 3 Land amalgamation and subdivision |
||
Lot amalgamation is to avoid creating: |
|
|
A primary street frontage less than that required by KLEP (Local Centres) 2012 |
|
YES |
A lot size less than that required by KLEP (Local Centres) 2012 |
|
YES |
Part 7 Residential flat development controls |
||
7A – Site design |
||
7A.1 Building Setbacks |
||
A minimum street setback of 10m is required. |
>10m |
YES |
A 2m articulation zone must be provided behind the street setback with no more than 40% of the zone occupied by the building. |
<40% |
YES |
The building line is to be parallel to the prevailing building line in the street. |
Building line is parallel to prevailing building line |
YES |
A minimum side setback of 6m is required up to the fourth storey. |
6m |
YES |
For building of 3 storeys or less on sites less than 1800m2 a minimum side setback of 3m is required. |
>3m |
YES |
Side setback areas behind the building line are not to be used for driveways or vehicular access into the building. |
Side setback contains the driveway to the basement |
NO |
Driveways must be set back a minimum of 6m from the side boundary within the street setback to allow for deep soil planting. |
The driveway has a 3m setback from the side boundary |
NO |
Side and rear setbacks at the zone interface must be a minimum of 9m to the fourth storey and above |
Proposal < four stories |
YES
|
Basements must not encroach into the street, side and rear setbacks. |
No encroachments |
YES |
Ground floor terraces and courtyards must have a minimum setback of 8m from the street boundary |
>8m |
YES |
Ground floor terraces and courtyards must have a minimum setback of 4m from the side and rear boundaries |
Min. 4m |
YES |
A maximum of 15% of the total area of the street setback is to be occupied by private terraces and courtyards |
<15% |
YES |
7A.2 Building separation |
||
The minimum separation between residential buildings on the development sites and the adjoining sites must be:
Up to 4th storey 12m between habitable rooms/balconies 9m between habitable rooms/balconies and non-habitable rooms 6m between non-habitable rooms |
6m 9m 6m
|
YES YES YES
|
7A.3 Site coverage |
|
|
The site coverage may be up to a maximum of 40% of the site area providing that the deep soil landscaping requirements in Part 7A.4 can be met. |
40% |
YES |
Where a site incorporates an access handle the site coverage must not exceed 35% of the total site area less 35% of the access handle. |
No access handle |
N/A |
7A.4 Deep soil landscaping |
||
Residential flat development must have a minimum deep soil landscaping area of 40% for a site area less than 1800m2 and 50% for a site area of 1800m2 or more |
40% |
YES |
Lots with the following sizes are to support a minimum number of tall trees capable or attaining a mature height of 13m on shale transitional soil and 10m on sandstone derived soils
1200m2 of less / 1 per 400m2 of site area 1201-1800m2 / 1 per 350m2 of site area 1801m2 or more / 1 per 300m2 of site area |
The site area is 1524m2. A minimum of 4 trees capable with a mature height of at least 13m are required. More than 4 trees are proposed. |
YES |
At least 50% of all tree plantings are to be locally occurring trees and spread around the site. |
At least 50% of the proposed tree plantings are locally occurring trees |
YES |
7B – Access and parking |
||
7B.1 – Car Parking Provision |
||
Residential flat developments must provide on-site car parking within basements |
A basement car park is proposed |
YES |
Basement car park areas must be consolidated under building footprints. |
The basement car park is located under the building footprint |
YES |
The basement car park must not project more than 1m above existing ground level to the floor level of the storey immediately above. |
Basement does not project more than 1m |
YES |
Direct internal access mist be provided from the basement car park to each level of the building |
Lift access from the basement to all floors of the residential flat building has been provided |
YES |
For residential flat developments not within 400m of a railway station the car parking rates for the following apartment types apply:
One bedroom: 1 spaces Two bedroom:1 spaces Three bedroom:1.5 spaces |
A minimum of 12 spaces are required. 15 spaces for the residents of the residential flat building have been provided. |
YES |
For every 4 apartments one visitor car space is required. At least one visitor car space is to comply with the dimensional and location requirements of AS2890.6 |
2 visitor spaces provided |
YES |
One visitor car space is to be provided with a tap to make provision for on-site car washing |
One car washing bay provided |
YES |
Each adaptable housing dwelling is to be provided with at least one car space which complies with the dimensional and locational requirements of AS2890.6 |
Each adaptable dwelling has a car space which complies with the dimensional and locational requirements of AS2890.6 |
YES |
A space to the temporary parking of service and removalist vehicles is to be provided. The space is to have a minimum dimension of 3.5m x 6m and minimum manoeuvring area 7m wide. |
The required space is provided within the basement |
YES |
7B.2 Bicycle Parking Provision |
||
A minimum of 1 bicycle space per 5 units shall be provided within the residential car park area |
2 resident bicycle spaces provided |
YES |
A minimum of 1 bicycle space per 10 units shall be provided for visitors in the visitor car park area |
1 visitor bicycle spaces provided |
YES |
7C - Building design and sustainability |
||
|
||
7C.1 - Communal Open Space |
||
At least 10% of the site area must be provided as communal open space with a minimum dimension of 5m |
>10% |
YES |
A single parcel of communal open space with a minimum area of 80m2, minimum dimensions of 8m and 3 hours solar access to 50% of the space on 21 June must be provided |
More than 40m2 of the communal open space area will achieve 3 hours solar access |
YES |
The communal open space must be provided at ground level behind the building line |
Communal open space is provided behind the building line. The primary area is however provided within the front setback, consistent with the adjoining residential flat building at No. 17 Turramurra Avenue. |
NO |
Shared facilities such as BBQs, shade structures, play equipment and seating are to be provided in the communal open space |
Seating areas provided |
YES |
7C.2 – Private open space |
||
Ground floor and podium apartments are to have a terrace or private courtyard with a minimum area of 25m2 |
>25m2 |
YES |
All apartments not at the ground floor or podium level are to include private open space with a minimum area (internal dimension) of:: - 10m2 – 1 bedroom apartment - 12m2 – 2 bedroom apartment - 15m2 – 3 bedroom or larger apartment
|
2 bedroom min 12m2 3 bedroom min 15m2 |
YES
|
The primary outdoor open space must have a minimum dimension of 2.4m |
>2.4m |
YES |
The primary private open space is to have direct access from the main living areas |
All outdoor spaces are accessed from the main living area |
YES |
Private open space for ground and podium level apartments is to be differentiated from common areas by: A change in level Screen planting, such as hedges and low shrubs A fence wall to a maximum height of 1.8m, any solid wall component is to be a maximum height of 1.2m with 30% transparent component above plus gate to the common area. |
Change in levels, planting and fencing is used to differentiate ground level private open space from common areas. |
YES |
7C.3 – Solar access |
||
A minimum of 70% of apartments in each building must receive at least 3 hours direct sunlight to living rooms and adjacent private open space between 9am and 3pm on 21 June |
>70% |
YES |
A minimum of 50% of the common open space for residents use must receive direct sunlight for 3 hours between 9m and 3pm on 21 June |
>50% of the common open space will receive 3 hours solar access |
YES |
The number of single aspect apartments with a southerly aspect (SW to SE) is limited to 10% of the total number of apartments proposed in each building. |
None proposed |
YES |
All developments must allow the retention of 3 hours sunlight between 9am and 3pm on 21 June to living areas and the principal portion of the private and communal open space of existing residential flat buildings and multi-dwelling housing on adjoining lots and any residential development in adjoining lower density zones |
>3 hours of solar access to adjoining heritage item (single dwelling) has been demonstrated to be achieved. |
YES |
Developments must allow the retention of a minimum 4 hours direct sunlight to all existing neighbouring solar collectors and solar hot water services |
No impact on neighbouring solar collectors and solar hot water services |
YES |
All developments must utilise shading and glare control |
Shading devices are proposed |
YES |
7C.4 – Natural Ventilation |
||
All habitable rooms are to have operable windows or doors |
Operable windows and doors provided |
YES |
At least 60% of apartments must have natural cross ventilation |
100% |
YES |
At least 25% of kitchens are to be immediately adjacent to an operable window |
6/ 8 = 75% |
YES |
Cross ventilation is not to be dependant on skylights or open corridors where it would impact on privacy |
No reliance on windows to open corridors or skylights |
YES |
7C.5 – Apartment depth and width |
||
Dual aspect apartments are to have a maximum internal plan depth of 18m from glass line to glass line |
<18m |
YES |
Single aspect apartments are to have a maximum internal plan depth of 8m from glass line to internal face of wall of habitable area |
No single aspect apartment proposed |
YES |
The width of dual aspect apartments over 15m deep must be 4m or greater to avoid deep narrow apartment layouts |
<15m |
YES |
All kitchens must not be located more than 8m to the back wall of the kitchen from an external opening |
All kitchen are within 8m on an external opening |
YES |
7C.6 – Apartment mix and sizes |
||
A range of apartment sizes and types must be included in the development |
2 and 3 bedrooms proposed |
YES |
One bedroom and studio apartments are to have a minimum floor area of 38.5m2 |
N/A |
N/A |
Two bedroom apartments are to have a minimum floor area of 70m2 |
The 2 unit bedroom proposed is >70m2 |
N/A |
Three bedroom apartments are to have a minimum floor area of 95m2 |
All units >95m2. |
YES |
A mix of 1, 2 and 3 bedroom apartments are to be provided on the ground level |
3 bedroom apartments only provided at the ground level |
NO |
At least one apartments for each 10 apartments is to be designed as adaptable housing Class C |
1 adaptable apartment has been provided |
YES |
At least 70% of apartments in the development are to be visitable |
100% |
YES |
7C.7 – Room sizes |
||
Living areas in apartments with two or more bedrooms are to have living areas with a minimum internal plan dimension of 4m |
>4m |
YES |
Bedrooms in one and two bedroom apartments must have minimum internal plan dimension of 3m (excluding wardrobes) |
3m min. |
YES |
In apartments with 3 or more bedrooms at least two bedrooms are to have minimum internal plan dimension of 3m (excluding wardrobes) |
3m min. |
YES |
Built in wardrobes are to be provided to all studio apartments, to all bedrooms in one and two bedroom apartments and to at least two bedrooms in apartments of three or more bedrooms |
Built in wardrobes have been provided. |
YES |
7C.8 – Building entries |
||
Buildings must address the street either: with main entrances to lift lobbies directly accessible and visible from the street; or with the path to the building entry readily visible from the street where site configuration is conducive to having a side entry. |
The entry to the building is set back from the street as the building is located at on the northern side of the development midway along the elevation. The pedestrian entry to the site is identified by an attached structure. |
YES |
Buildings with facades over 18m long must have multiple entries.
|
The façade of the building is less than 18m long. One has been provided. |
YES |
Building entry must be integrated with building facade design. At street level, the entry is to be articulated with awnings, porticos, recesses or projecting bays for clear identification.
|
The entry to the building is integrated into the façade design and clearly distinguishable. |
YES |
All entry areas must be well lit and designed to avoid any concealment or entrapment areas. All light spill is prohibited.
|
The entry area does not contain concealment or entrapment areas. Light spill will be managed through condition. |
YES |
Lockable mail boxes must be provided close to the street. They must be at 90 degrees to the street and to Australia Post standards and integrated with front fences or building entries.
|
Mailboxes are located at the front boundary of the site and are orientated 90 degrees to the street alignment. |
YES |
On large development sites comprising multiple building blocks, clear entries, sightlines and way-finding signs are to be provided. |
The layout of the development is relatively simple and way finding signage is unlikely to be necessary.
|
YES |
7C.9 Internal Common Circulation |
||
The design of internal common circulation space must comply with the provisions in AS1428.1 and AS1428.2 to provide adequate pedestrian mobility and access.
|
An access report which demonstrates compliance with the standards has been provided. |
YES |
All common circulation areas including foyers, lift lobbies and stairways must have: i) appropriate levels of lighting with a preference for natural light where possible; ii) short corridor lengths that give clear sight lines; iii) clear signage noting apartment numbers, common areas and general direction finding; iv) natural ventilation; v) low maintenance and robust materials.
|
All common circulations areas have natural lighting and ventilation. All corridors are short in length and provide clear sight lines. |
YES
|
Where artificial lighting is required energy efficient lights are to be used in conjunction with timers or daylight controls.
|
This issue is addressed by the BASIX certificate |
YES |
All single common corridors must: - serve a maximum of 8 units - >1.5m wide - >1.8m wide at lift lobbies |
No corridor serves more than 3 units. All corridors are 1.8m wide at lift lobbies and 1.5m wide elsewhere. |
YES
|
7C.10 Building facades |
||
Street, side and rear building facades must be modulated and articulation with wall planes varying in depth by not less than 0.6m. No single wall plane is to exceed 81m2 in area. |
wall planes <81m2, varying depth >0.6m |
YES |
The continuous length of a single building on any elevation must not exceed 36m. The length of a single building elevation facing the side or rear may exceed 36m providing that:
The façade is recessed to an adequate depth and width to appear as distinctive bays or wings The recess is common area with landscaping which includes at least one medium tree with an 8m canopy diameter at maturity |
The side elevations are <36m in length. Design criteria of DCP otherwise complied with. |
YES |
Air conditioning units must not be located on the building façade or with the private open space |
Air conditioning units are located on the roof within a screened plant area, integrated into the roof profile |
YES |
Balconies that run the full length of the building façade are not permitted |
No balconies that run the full length of the building façade are proposed |
YES |
Balconies must not project more than 1.5m from the outermost wall of the building facade |
Balconies at the rear of the building do not project more than 1.5m from the outer most wall. |
YES |
Windows to a habitable room are to be situated to encourage opportunities for passive surveillance to the site and on site areas surrounding the building |
Windows to a habitable room positioned to provide for passive surveillance to the site and on site areas surrounding the building |
YES |
7C.11 – Building storeys |
||
Sites with the following maximum building heights under the Ku-ring-gai LEP (Local Centres) are to have a maximum number of storeys above the basement as follows: 11.5m = 3 storeys 14.5m = 4 storeys 17.5m = 5 storeys 23.5m = 7 storeys |
The site is subject to a height limit of 11.5m and the building has a height of 3 storeys |
YES |
7C.12 – Ground floor apartments |
||
The finished ground level outside the living area at the building line of a ground level apartment must not be more than 0.9m below existing ground level. |
All private open space areas are above NGL. |
YES |
Where the finished ground level outside the living area at the building line is more than 0.5m, the private open space must be level for a minimum of 2.4m from the living area.
|
Levels consistent with DCP control |
YES |
No obstructions, such as retaining walls or fences, are permitted to project beyond a 45˚ control plane, (10am sun angle at 23 March) drawn from the finished ground level outside the living area at the building line to the end of the private open space. Plants may project beyond the 45˚ control plane.
|
No obstructions |
YES |
7C.13 – Top storey design and roof forms |
||
The gross floor area of the top storey is not to exceed 60% of the gross floor area of the storey immediately below. |
60% |
YES |
The top storey of a building is to be set back from the outer face of the floors below on all sides (roof projection is allowed beyond the outer face of the top storey).
|
The lift, corridor and fire stairs of the top storey are setback from the floors below. |
YES |
The upper storeys of residential buildings are to be articulated with differentiated roof forms, maisonettes or mezzanine penthouses and the like.
|
A skillion roof is proposed |
YES |
Service elements are to be integrated into the overall design of the roof so as not to be visible from the public domain or any surrounding development. These elements include lift overruns, plant equipment, chimneys, vent stacks, water storage, communication devices and signage.
|
The lift overruns have been integrated into the design of the building. No plant equipment, chimneys, vent stacks, water storage, communication devices and signage is located on the roof. |
YES |
Roof design must respond to solar access, for example, by using eaves and skillion roofs.
|
The eaves of the skillion roofs will provide sun protection to the windows on the top floor level. |
YES |
Where solar panels are provided they must be integrated into the roof line.
|
. |
N/A |
Lightweight pergolas, privacy screens and planters are permitted on the roof, provided they do not increase the bulk of the building, create visual clutter or impact on significant views from adjoining properties.
|
Screens proposed to A/C and hot water units successfully integrated into building |
YES |
7C.14 – Internal ceiling heights |
||
The minimum ceiling height for a habitable room shall be 2.4m |
2.7m min. |
YES |
The minimum ceiling height for a non-habitable room shall be 2.25m |
2.7m min. |
YES |
7C.15 – Visual privacy |
||
Buildings must be designed to ensure privacy for residents of the development and of the neighbouring site. The use of offset balconies, recessed balconies, vertical fins, solid and semi-transparent balustrades, louvres/screen panels and planter boxes is encouraged. |
Privacy for residents of the development and neighbouring sites has been considered. Recessed balconies, plantings, screens and vertical fins have been utilised. |
YES |
Privacy for ground floor apartments should be achieved by the use of a change in level and/or screen planting. |
Changes in level, fencing and landscaping used to achieve privacy |
YES |
Continuous transparent balustrades are not permitted to balconies or terraces for the lower 3 storeys. |
Balustrade design has been adequately configured to maintain privacy of future residents |
YES |
Screening between apartments must be integrated with the overall building design.
|
Screening devices are integrated into the design of the building |
YES |
Landscaped screening must be provided to adjoining sites.
|
Landscape planting has been provided adjacent to the site boundaries |
YES |
7C.16 - Storage |
||
Storage space shall be provided at the following minimum volumes: - 6m3 for studio and one bedroom apartments - 8m3 for two bedroom units - 10m3 for two bedroom units - 12m3 for units with three or more bedrooms At least 50% of the required storage space must be provided inside the apartment. |
Storage provision complies with these requirements. |
YES |
7C.17 – External air clothes drying facilities |
||
Each apartment is required to have access to an external air clothes drying area, e.g. a screened balcony, a terrace or common area. |
All apartments have access to a screened clothes drying area |
YES |
External air clothes drying areas must be screened from public and common open space areas. |
All external clothes drying area are screened from public and common open space areas |
YES |
Where space is provided in common areas clothes lines are to be provided.
|
Provisions integrated |
YES |
7C.18 - Fencing |
||
Front fences and walls (to a public street) and side fences in the street setback must not be higher than: i) 0.9m if of closed construction (such as masonry, lapped and capped timber or brushwood fences); or ii) 1.2m if of open construction (such as open paling and picket fences).
Note: Open fencing includes: panels set into a timber frame or between brick piers, where any solid base is not taller than 0.9m, and panels are spaced pickets, palings, or lattice. |
No front fence proposed |
N/A |
Closed front fences with a maximum height of 1.8m may be considered where the site fronts a busy road or other sources of undesirable noise. These fences are to be set back at least 2m from the front boundary and screened by landscaping. Note: Rendered masonry boundary walls are generally inappropriate to the landscape character of Ku-ring-gai. |
|
N/A |
Fences and walls must step down and follow the natural contours of the site.
|
|
YES |
Hedges and shrub planting on the front boundary are to have a maximum height of 1.2m.
|
|
YES |
All fencing must be designed to highlight entrances, and be compatible with buildings, letterboxes and garbage storage areas.
|
Entrance portico provided; acceptable |
YES |
External finishes for fencing must be robust and graffiti resistant.
|
The external finishes are robust & graffiti resistant |
YES |
An assessment of the variations to the design controls identified in the compliance table is provided below.
Driveway setback
Control 7A.1(8) of the DCP requires a 6m setback to the side boundary for driveways associated with residential flat developments. The objective of this control is to ensure that driveways do not compromise the landscape setting or neighbouring amenity.
A reduced driveway setback to the side (southern) boundary has been proposed, with a 2.5m side setback.
The reduced driveway setback is considered acceptable on the basis that in order to comply with the control, it would be necessary to locate the basement within the middle of the building’s front façade / site, which on a relatively narrow, three storey building is undesirable and would compromise the architectural presentation and streetscape. Further, to satisfy the necessary driveway grades, the driveway ramp would have to be curved, which would in turn dominate the front setback with hardstand area, limiting landscaping, a key outcome of the control’s objective. Given the undesirability of the compliant alternative in this instance, the proposed variation is acceptable.
Communal open space
The development positions the primary part of its required area of communal open space within the front setback area, contrary to the controls of the DCP which requires this area to be located at the rear of the site.
However, the location of the communal open space within the front setback is acceptable in this instance as this location is favourable for solar access and is consistent with the open space configuration of the adjoining residential flat development, which is similarly sized and configured.
A complying design where the communal open space is located at the rear would restrict the building envelope, as a greater rear setback would be necessary. The building footprint is already impacted upon by large setbacks to the heritage item to the south. As the site is relatively small it is impractical to demand a smaller building footprint. Communal open space at the rear would also receive less solar access and be overlooked somewhat by the rear of the adjoining flat building at 17 Turramurra Avenue.
Apartment mix at ground floor:
Control 7C.6(3) of the Local Centres DCP requires a mixture of 1, 2 and 3 bedroom units within new development to be provided at the ground floor. The proposed development proposes 3 units at the ground floor, each being 3 bedroom.
The development is a small flat building of a total of 8 units. The layout of the units is generous, allowing the units to be occupied by a range of housing types. Such units also provide for and an increased choice for seniors or people with a disability who may be seeking to occupy a unit, both of which are the objectives supporting the control for diversity at the ground floor.
Given the small size of the development and that surrounding developments provides for a large percentage of their ground floor units as 1 and 2 bedroom units, despite the non-compliance the proposal will provide for and add to the mix of unit types at ground floor within the immediate area. The proposal is acceptable in this regard.
Volume B – Part 2 site design for water management
The configuration and composition of the development is considered to be consistent with the controls of Part 2 – site design for water management.
Volume B – Part 6 biodiversity controls
The subject site is mapped within the DCP as containing vegetation representative of Category 2, 4 and 5 vegetation.
The design of the scheme acknowledges this vegetation which is successfully integrated into the design to retain and enhance this vegetation.
Consistent with the comments of Council’s Landscape Assessment Officer, the proposed development is consistent with the controls of the DCP and achieves the objectives for biodiversity retention and enhancement within the LCLEP 2012.
Volume C- Part 1 site design
The configuration and composition of the development is considered to be consistent with the controls of Part 1 – site design contained within the DCP.
Volume C – Part 2 access and parking
The development’s basement has been designed to satisfy the design criteria and controls as required by Part 2 of the DCP.
In addition to this, the application is supported by a detailed traffic report and analysis that demonstrates that the development will have an acceptable impact upon traffic flows and movements within the local area, but that the basement supports the necessary movements for vehicles that need to access it.
The basement is also supported with the required ancillary facilities required by the DCP, including bicycle parking, adaptable car parking and a car wash bay.
It is noted that the staging area for the garbage truck and furniture removal trucks is to be accommodate within the isle of the basement carpark. Given the small size of the development and infrequency of vehicle movements within the basement, the absence of a designed staging area for these vehicles is not strictly necessary.
Volume C – Part 4 water management
A detailed stormwater plan has been submitted which demonstrates how stormwater generated by the development will be captured and conveyed to Council’s trunk drainage system.
Consistent with the comments of Council’s Development Engineer, the stormwater system’s design is consistent with the controls of the DCP, subject to Conditions 80 to 86.
Volume C – Part 5 notification controls
The proposed development has been notified in accordance with the requirements of Volume C – Part 5 of the notification controls.
Section 94 Development Contributions Plan 2010
The development attracts a section 94 contribution of $250,255.10 which is required to be paid prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate (Condition 36).
Likely Impacts
The likely impacts of the development have been considered within this report and are deemed to be acceptable, subject to conditions.
Suitability of the Site
The site is suitable for the proposed development.
Public Interest
Approval of the application is considered to be in the public interest.
Conclusion
Having regard to the provisions of section 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, the proposed development is considered to be satisfactory.
THAT Council, as the consent authority, grant development consent to DA0380/15 for the demolition of the existing dwelling and construction of a residential flat building containing eight units and basement carparking on land at 15 Turramurra Avenue, Turramurra, for a period of 2 years from the date of the notice of determination subject to the following conditions:
Conditions that identify approved plans:
1. Approved architectural plans and documentation
The development must be carried out in accordance with the following plans and documentation listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, except where amended by other conditions of this consent:
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
2. Inconsistency between documents
In the event of any inconsistency between conditions of this consent and the drawings/documents referred to above, the conditions of this consent prevail.
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
Conditions to be satisfied prior to demolition, excavation or construction:
3. Asbestos works
All work involving asbestos products and materials, including asbestos-cement-sheeting (ie. Fibro), must be carried out in accordance with the guidelines for asbestos work published by WorkCover Authority of NSW.
Reason: To ensure public safety
4. Notice of commencement
At least 48 hours prior to the commencement of any development (including demolition, excavation, shoring or underpinning works), a notice of commencement of building or subdivision work form and appointment of the principal certifying authority form shall be submitted to Council.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
5. Notification of builder’s details
Prior to the commencement of any development or excavation works, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be notified in writing of the name and contractor licence number of the owner/builder intending to carry out the approved works.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
6. Dilapidation survey and report (public infrastructure)
Prior to the commencement of any development or excavation works on site, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a dilapidation report on the visible and structural condition of all structures of the following public infrastructure, has been completed and submitted to Council:
Public infrastructure
· Full road pavement width, including kerb and gutter, of Turramurra Avenue over the site frontage · All driveway crossings and laybacks opposite the subject site.
The report must be completed by a consulting structural/civil engineer. Particular attention must be paid to accurately recording (both written and photographic) existing damaged areas on the aforementioned infrastructure so that Council is fully informed when assessing any damage to public infrastructure caused as a result of the development.
The developer may be held liable to any recent damage to public infrastructure in the vicinity of the site, where such damage is not accurately recorded by the requirements of this condition prior to the commencement of works.
Note: A written acknowledgment from Council must be obtained (attesting to this condition being appropriately satisfied) and submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the commencement of any excavation works.
Reason: To record the structural condition of public infrastructure before works commence.
7. Dilapidation survey and report (private property)
Prior to the commencement of any demolition or excavation works on site, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a dilapidation report on the visible and structural condition of all structures upon the following lands, has been completed and submitted to Council:
The dilapidation report must include a photographic survey of adjoining properties detailing their physical condition, both internally and externally, including such items as walls ceilings, roof and structural members. The report must be completed by a consulting structural/geotechnical engineer as determined necessary by that professional based on the excavations for the proposal and the recommendations of the submitted geotechnical report.
In the event that access for undertaking the dilapidation survey is denied by a property owner, the applicant must demonstrate in writing to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority that all reasonable steps have been taken to obtain access and advise the affected property owner of the reason for the survey and that these steps have failed.
Note: A copy of the dilapidation report is to be provided to Council prior to any excavation works been undertaken. The dilapidation report is for record keeping purposes only and may be used by an applicant or affected property owner to assist in any civil action required to resolve any dispute over damage to adjoining properties arising from works.
Reason: To record the structural condition of likely affected properties before works commence.
8. Construction and traffic management plan
The applicant must submit to Council a Construction Traffic Management Plan (TMP), which is to be approved prior to the commencement of any works on site.
The plan is to consist of a report with Traffic Control Plans attached.
The report is to contain commitments which must be followed by the demolition and excavation contractor, builder, owner and subcontractors. The TMP applies to all persons associated with demolition, excavation and construction of the development.
The report is to contain construction vehicle routes for approach and departure to and from all directions.
The report is to contain a site plan showing entry and exit points. Swept paths are to be shown on the site plan showing access and egress for a 12.5 metre long heavy rigid vehicle and if required for demolition and excavation stages a 19.0 metre long articulated vehicle are to be shown.
The Traffic Control Plans are to be prepared by a qualified person (red card holder). One must be provided for each of the following stages of the works:
· Demolition · Excavation · Concrete pour · Construction of vehicular crossing and reinstatement of footpath · Traffic control for vehicles reversing into or out of the site.
Traffic controllers must be in place at the site entry and exit points to control heavy vehicle movements in order to maintain the safety of pedestrians and other road users.
When a satisfactory TMP is received, a letter of approval will be issued with conditions attached. Traffic management at the site must comply with the approved TMP as well as any conditions in the letter issued by Council. Council’s Rangers will be patrolling the site regularly and fines will be issued for any non-compliance with this condition.
Reason: To ensure that appropriate measures have been considered during all phases of the construction process in a manner that maintains the environmental amenity and ensures the ongoing safety and protection of people.
9. Work zone
A works zone shall be provided along the site frontage. The applicant must make a written application to the Ku-ring-gai Local Traffic Committee to install the work zone. Work zones are provided specifically for the set down and pick up of materials and not for the parking of private vehicles associated with the site. Work zones will generally not be approved where there is sufficient space on-site for the setting down and picking up of goods being taken to or from a construction site.
If the work zone is approved by the Local Traffic Committee, the applicant must obtain a written copy of the related resolution from the Ku-ring-gai Local Traffic Committee and submit this to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to commencement of any works on site.
Where approval of the work zone is resolved by the Committee, the necessary work zone signage shall be installed (at the cost of the applicant) and the adopted fee paid prior to commencement of any works on site. At the expiration of the work zone approval, the applicant is required to remove the work zone signs and reinstate any previous signs at their expense.
In the event the work zone is required for a period beyond that initially approved by the Traffic Committee, the applicant shall make a payment to Council for the extended period in accordance with Council’s schedule of fees and charges for work zones prior to the extended period commencing.
Reason: To ensure that appropriate measures have been made for the operation of the site during the construction phase.
10. Sediment controls
Prior to any work commencing on site, sediment and erosion control measures shall be installed along the contour immediately downslope of any future disturbed areas.
The form of the sediment controls to be installed on the site shall be determined by reference to the Landcom manual ‘Managing Urban Stormwater: Soils and Construction’. The erosion controls shall be maintained in an operational condition until the development activities have been completed and the site fully stabilised. Sediment shall be removed from the sediment controls following each heavy or prolonged rainfall period.
Reason: To preserve and enhance the natural environment.
11. Tree protection fencing
To preserve the following tree/s, no work shall commence until the area beneath their canopy is fenced off at the specified radius from the trunk/s to prevent any activities, storage or the disposal of materials within the fenced area. The fence/s shall be maintained intact until the completion of all demolition/building work on site.
Reason: To protect existing trees during the construction phase.
12. Tree protection fencing excluding structure
To preserve the following tree/s, no work shall commence until the area beneath their canopy excluding that area of the approved building/basement shall be fenced off for the specified radius from the trunk to prevent any activities, storage or the disposal of materials within the fenced area. The fence/s shall be maintained intact until the completion of all demolition/building work on site:
Reason: To protect existing trees during the construction phase.
13. Tree protective fencing type galvanised mesh
The tree protection fencing shall be constructed of galvanised pipe at 2.4 metre spacing and connected by securely attached chain mesh fencing to a minimum height of 1.8 metres in height prior to work commencing.
Reason: To protect existing trees during construction phase.
14. Tree protection signage
Prior to works commencing, tree protection signage is to be attached to each tree protection zone, displayed in a prominent position and the sign repeated at 10 metres intervals or closer where the fence changes direction. Each sign shall contain in a clearly legible form, the following information:
Tree protection zone.
· This fence has been installed to prevent damage to the trees and their growing environment both above and below ground and access is restricted. · Any encroachment not previously approved within the tree protection zone shall be the subject of an arborist's report. · The arborist's report shall provide proof that no other alternative is available. · The Arborist's report shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority for further consultation with Council. · The name, address, and telephone number of the developer.
Reason: To protect existing trees during the construction phase.
15. Tree fencing inspection
Upon installation of the required tree protection measures, an inspection of the site by the Principal Certifying Authority is required to verify that tree protection measures comply with all relevant conditions.
Reason: To protect existing trees during the construction phase.
16. Construction waste management plan
Prior to the commencement of any works, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a waste management plan, prepared by a suitably qualified person, has been prepared in accordance with Council’s Waste Management controls in the Ku-ring-gai Development Control Plan.
The plan shall address all issues identified in DCP 40, including but not limited to: the estimated volume of waste and method for disposal for the construction and operation phases of the development.
Note: The plan shall be provided to the Certifying Authority.
Reason: To ensure appropriate management of construction waste.
17. Noise and vibration management plan
Prior to the commencement of any works, a noise and vibration management plan is to be prepared by a suitably qualified expert addressing the likely noise and vibration from demolition, excavation and construction of the proposed development and provided to the Principal Certifying Authority. The management plan is to identify amelioration measures to achieve the best practice objectives of AS 2436-2010 and NSW Department of Environment and Climate Change Interim Construction Noise Guidelines. The report shall be prepared in consultation with any geotechnical report that itemises equipment to be used for excavation works.
The management plan shall address, but not be limited to, the following matters:
· - identification of the specific activities that will be carried out and associated noise sources · - identification of all potentially affected sensitive receivers, including residences, churches, commercial premises, schools and properties containing noise sensitive equipment · - the construction noise objective specified in the conditions of this consent · the construction vibration criteria specified in the conditions of this consent · determination of appropriate noise and vibration objectives for each identified sensitive receiver · - noise and vibration monitoring, reporting and response procedures · assessment of potential noise and vibration from the proposed demolition, excavation and construction activities, including noise from construction vehicles and any traffic diversions · - description of specific mitigation treatments, management methods and procedures that will be implemented to control noise and vibration during construction · - construction timetabling to minimise noise impacts including time and duration restrictions, respite periods and frequency · - procedures for notifying residents of construction activities that are likely to affect their amenity through noise and vibration · - contingency plans to be implemented in the event of non-compliances and/or noise complaints
Reason: To protect the amenity afforded to surrounding residents during the construction process.
Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of the construction certificate:
18. Liveable housing guideline
Prior to the issue of any Construction Certificate, the certifying authority shall be satisfied that a minimum of 20% of units within the development incorporate the necessary design and construction required to meet and exceed The Liveable Housing Guideline’s silver level universal design features. Comprehensive plans and specifications as required shall accompany the construction certificate in this regard.
Reason: To ensure compliance with the Apartment Design Guideline.
19. Amendments to approved architectural plans
Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the approved architectural plans, listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, have been amended in accordance with the requirements of this condition as well as other conditions of this consent:
The above architectural plan(s) shall be amended in the following ways:
1. The proposed paving and privacy screen adjacent to the building entry are to be set back 800mm from the northern boundary in line with the proposed screening to the entry path.
Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the amended architectural plan has been submitted as required by this condition.
Note: An amended architectural plan shall be submitted to the Certifying Authority.
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
20. Amendments to approved landscape plan
Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the approved landscape plans, listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, have been amended in accordance with the requirements of this condition as well as other conditions of this consent:
The above landscape plan shall be amended in the following ways:
1. An additional area of lawn, minimum 3m x7m is to be provided at approximately the existing tennis court level directly adjacent the steps to the upper lawn area.
2. The existing sandstone wall is to be retained as per the landscape plan. The proposed stormwater line is to be relocated to avoid the existing sandstone wall and be relocated closer to the building.
3. The proposed paving and privacy screen adjacent to the building entry are to be set back 800mm from the northern boundary in line with the proposed screening to the entry path. An additional 4 x Camellia sasanqua (Chinese Camellia) are to be provided within this setback.
4. The proposed tree planting of one (1) Eucalyptus pilularis (Blackbutt) at the south-western corner of the site is to be substituted with a deciduous canopy tree species such as Jacaranda mimosifolia (Jacaranda) or similar .
5. The proposed new location of Tree 5/ Phoenix canariensis (Canary Island Palm) that is to be transplanted as part of this development as per relevant condition, is to be shown.
Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the landscape plan has been amended are required by this condition.
Note: An amended plan, prepared by a landscape architect or qualified landscape designer shall be submitted to the Certifying Authority.
Reason: To ensure adequate landscaping of the site
21. Amendments to approved engineering plans
Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the approved engineering plan(s), listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, have been amended in accordance with the requirements of this condition as well as other conditions of this consent:
The above engineering plan(s) shall be amended as follows:
1. The stormwater plan is to be in accordance with the approved architectural and landscape plans.
2. The existing trees to be retained are to be numbered on all stormwater plans in accordance with the landscape plan.
3. The existing sandstone wall located at the south-eastern corner of the site is to be shown to be retained as per the landscape plan.
4. The proposed stormwater line is to be relocated to avoid the existing sandstone wall.
5. Proposed swales located within tree protection zones are to be excavated by hand under arborist supervision to avoid impacts on tree roots.
Note: An amended engineering plan, prepared by a qualified engineer shall be submitted to the Certifying Authority.
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
22. Long service levy
In accordance with Section 109F(i) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act a Construction Certificate shall not be issued until any long service levy payable under Section 34 of the Building and Construction Industry Long Service Payments Act 1986 (or where such levy is payable by instalments, the first instalment of the levy) has been paid. Council is authorised to accept payment. Where payment has been made elsewhere, proof of payment is to be provided to Council.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
23. Builder’s indemnity insurance
The applicant, builder, developer or person who does the work on this development, must arrange builder’s indemnity insurance and submit the certificate of insurance in accordance with the requirements of Part 6 of the Home Building Act 1989 to the Certifying Authority for endorsement of the plans accompanying the Construction Certificate.
It is the responsibility of the applicant, builder or developer to arrange the builder's indemnity insurance for residential building work over the value of $20,000. The builder's indemnity insurance does not apply to commercial or industrial building work or to residential work valued at less than $20,000, nor to work undertaken by persons holding an owner/builder's permit issued by the Department of Fair Trading (unless the owner/builder's property is sold within 7 years of the commencement of the work).
Reason: Statutory requirement.
24. Outdoor lighting
Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that all outdoor lighting will comply with AS/NZ1158.3: 1999 Pedestrian Area (Category P) Lighting and AS4282: 1997 Control of the Obtrusive Effects of Outdoor Lighting.
Note: Details demonstrating compliance with these requirements are to be submitted prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate.
Reason: To provide high quality external lighting for security without adverse affects on public amenity from excessive illumination levels.
25. Excavation for services
Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that no proposed underground services (ie: water, sewerage, drainage, gas or other service) unless previously approved by conditions of consent, are located beneath the canopy of any tree protected under Council’s Tree Preservation Order, located on the subject allotment and adjoining allotments.
Note: A plan detailing the routes of these services and trees protected under the Tree Preservation Order shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority.
Reason: To ensure the protection of trees.
26. Noise from plant in residential zone
Where any form of mechanical ventilation equipment or other noise generating plant is proposed as part of the development, prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate the Certifying Authority, shall be satisfied that the operation of an individual piece of equipment or operation of equipment in combination will not exceed more than 5dB(A) above the background level during the day when measured at the site’s boundaries and shall not exceed the background level at night (10.00pm –6.00 am) when measured at the boundary of the site.
C1. Note: A certificate from an appropriately qualified acoustic engineer is to be submitted with the Construction Certificate, certifying that all mechanical ventilation equipment or other noise generating plant in isolation or in combination with other plant will comply with the above requirements.
Reason: To comply with best practice standards for residential acoustic amenity.
27. Driveway crossing levels
Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, driveway and associated footpath levels for any new, reconstructed or extended sections of driveway crossings between the property boundary and road alignment must be obtained from Ku-ring-gai Council. Such levels are only able to be issued by Council under the Roads Act 1993. All footpath crossings, laybacks and driveways are to be constructed according to Council's specifications "Construction of Gutter Crossings and Footpath Crossings".
Specifications are issued with alignment levels after completing the necessary application form at Customer Services and payment of the assessment fee. When completing the request for driveway levels application from Council, the applicant must attach a copy of the relevant development application drawing which indicates the position and proposed level of the proposed driveway at the boundary alignment.
This development consent is for works wholly within the property. Development consent does not imply approval of footpath or driveway levels, materials or location within the road reserve, regardless of whether this information is shown on the development application plans. The grading of such footpaths or driveways outside the property shall comply with Council's standard requirements. The suitability of the grade of such paths or driveways inside the property is the sole responsibility of the applicant and the required alignment levels fixed by Council may impact upon these levels.
The construction of footpaths and driveways outside the property in materials other than those approved by Council is not permitted.
Reason: To provide suitable vehicular access without disruption to pedestrian and vehicular traffic.
28. Driveway grades - basement carparks
Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, longitudinal driveway sections are to be prepared by a qualified civil/traffic engineer and be submitted for to and approved by the Certifying Authority. These profiles are to be at 1:100 scale along both edges of the proposed driveway, starting from the centreline of the frontage street carriageway to the proposed basement floor level. The traffic engineer shall provide specific written certification on the plans that:
· vehicular access can be obtained using grades of 20% (1 in 5) maximum and · all changes in grade (transitions) comply with Australian Standard 2890.1 -“Off- street car parking” (refer clause 2.5.3) to prevent the scraping of the underside of vehicles.
If a new driveway crossing is proposed, the longitudinal sections must incorporate the driveway crossing levels as issued by Council upon prior application.
Reason: To provide suitable vehicular access without disruption to pedestrian and vehicular traffic.
29. Basement car parking details
Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, certified parking layout plan(s) to scale showing all aspects of the vehicle access and accommodation arrangements must be submitted to and approved by the Certifying Authority. A qualified civil/traffic engineer must review the proposed vehicle access and accommodation layout and provide written certification on the plans that:
· all parking space dimensions, driveway and aisle widths, driveway grades, transitions, circulation ramps, blind aisle situations and other trafficked areas comply with Australian Standard 2890.1 - 2004 “Off-street car parking” · a clear height clearance of 2.6 metres (Volume C Part 3.4 of the Local Centres DCP for waste collection trucks) is provided over the designated garbage collection truck manoeuvring areas within the basement · no doors or gates are provided in the access driveways to the basement carpark which would prevent unrestricted access for internal garbage collection at any time from the basement garbage storage and collection area · the vehicle access and accommodation arrangements are to be constructed and marked in accordance with the certified plans
Reason: To ensure that parking spaces are in accordance with the approved development.
30. Car parking allocation
Car parking within the development shall be allocated in the following way:
Each adaptable dwelling must be provided with car parking complying with the dimensional and location requirements of AS2890.1 - parking spaces for people with disabilities.
At least one visitor space shall also comply with the dimensional and location requirements of AS2890.1 - parking spaces for people with disabilities.
Consideration must be given to the means of access from disabled car parking spaces to other areas within the building and to footpath and roads and shall be clearly shown on the plans submitted with the Construction Certificate.
Reason: To ensure equity of access and appropriate facilities are available for people with disabilities in accordance with federal legislation.
31. Number of bicycle spaces
The basement car park shall be adapted to provide 3 bicycle spaces in accordance with the DCP. The bicycle parking spaces shall be designed in accordance with AS2890.3. Details shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the Certifying Authority prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate.
Reason: To provide alternative modes of transport to and from the site.
32. Energy Australia requirements
Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, the applicant must contact Energy Australia regarding power supply for the subject development. A written response detailing the full requirements of Energy Australia (including any need for underground cabling, substations or similar within or in the vicinity the development) shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority for approval prior to issue of the Construction Certificate.
Any structures or other requirements of Energy Australia shall be indicated on the plans issued with the Construction Certificate, to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority and Energy Australia. The requirements of Energy Australia must be met in full prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate.
Reason: To ensure compliance with the requirements of Energy Australia.
33. Utility provider requirements
Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, the applicant must make contact with all relevant utility providers whose services will be impacted upon by the development. A written copy of the requirements of each provider, as determined necessary by the Certifying Authority, must be obtained. All utility services or appropriate conduits for the same must be provided by the developer in accordance with the specifications of the utility providers.
Reason: To ensure compliance with the requirements of relevant utility providers.
34. Underground services
All electrical services (existing and proposed) shall be undergrounded from the proposed building on the site to the appropriate power pole(s) or other connection point. Undergrounding of services must not disturb the root system of existing trees and shall be undertaken in accordance with the requirements of the relevant service provided. Documentary evidence that the relevant service provider has been consulted and that their requirements have been met are to be provided to the Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate. All electrical and telephone services to the subject property must be placed underground and any redundant poles are to be removed at the expense of the applicant.
Reason: To provide infrastructure that facilitates the future improvement of the streetscape by relocation of overhead lines below ground.
Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of the construction certificate or prior to demolition, excavation or construction (whichever comes first):
35. Infrastructure restorations fee
To ensure that damage to Council Property as a result of construction activity is rectified in a timely matter:
a) All work or activity taken in furtherance of the development the subject of this approval must be undertaken in a manner to avoid damage to Council Property and must not jeopardise the safety of any person using or occupying the adjacent public areas.
b) The applicant, builder, developer or any person acting in reliance on this approval shall be responsible for making good any damage to Council Property, and for the removal from Council Property of any waste bin, building materials, sediment, silt, or any other material or article.
c) The Infrastructure Restoration Fee must be paid to the Council by the applicant prior to both the issue of the Construction Certificate and the commencement of any earthworks or construction.
d) In consideration of payment of the Infrastructure Restorations Fee, Council will undertake such inspections of Council Property as Council considers necessary and also undertake, on behalf of the applicant, such restoration work to Council Property, if any, that Council considers necessary as a consequence of the development. The provision of such restoration work by the Council does not absolve any person of the responsibilities contained in (a) to (b) above. Restoration work to be undertaken by the Council referred to in this condition is limited to work that can be undertaken by Council at a cost of not more than the Infrastructure Restorations Fee payable pursuant to this condition.
e) In this condition:
“Council Property” includes any road, footway, footpath paving, kerbing, guttering, crossings, street furniture, seats, letter bins, trees, shrubs, lawns, mounds, bushland, and similar structures or features on any road or public road within the meaning of the Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) or any public place; and
“Infrastructure Restoration Fee” means the Infrastructure Restorations Fee calculated in accordance with the Schedule of Fees & Charges adopted by Council as at the date of payment and the cost of any inspections required by the Council of Council Property associated with this condition.
Reason: To maintain public infrastructure.
36. Section 94 Contributions - Centres.
This development is subject to a development contribution calculated in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010, being a s94 Contributions Plan in effect under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, as follows:
Infrastructure Type Total LGA Wide Local Recreational & Cultural $15,888.76 Turramurra TC New Roads & Road Mods $27,761.67 Turramurra TC Local Parks & Sporting Facilities $123,323.12 Turramurra TC Townscape Transport & Pedest Fac $83,251.55
Development Contributions Total $250,225.10
The contribution shall be paid to Council prior to the issue of any Construction Certificate, Linen Plan, Certificate of Subdivision or Occupation Certificate whichever comes first in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010.
The contributions specified above are subject to indexation and will continue to be indexed to reflect changes in the consumer price index and housing price index until they are paid in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 to reflect changes in the consumer price index and housing price index. Prior to payment, please contact Council directly to verify the current payable contributions.
Copies of Council’s Contribution Plans can be viewed at Council Chambers, 818 Pacific Hwy Gordon or on Council’s website at www.kmc.nsw.gov.au.
Reason: To ensure the provision, extension or augmentation of the Key Community Infrastructure identified in Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 that will, or is likely to be, required as a consequence of the development.
Conditions to be satisfied during the demolition, excavation and construction phases:
37. Road opening permit
The opening of any footway, roadway, road shoulder or any part of the road reserve shall not be carried out without a road opening permit being obtained from Council (upon payment of the required fee) beforehand.
Reason: Statutory requirement (Roads Act 1993 Section 138) and to maintain the integrity of Council’s infrastructure.
38. Prescribed conditions
The applicant shall comply with any relevant prescribed conditions of development consent under clause 98 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation. For the purposes of section 80A (11) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, the following conditions are prescribed in relation to a development consent for development that involves any building work:
· The work must be carried out in accordance with the requirements of the Building Code of Australia · In the case of residential building work for which the Home Building Act 1989 requires there to be a contract of insurance in force in accordance with Part 6 of that Act, that such a contract of insurance is in force before any works commence.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
39. Hours of work
Demolition, excavation, construction work and deliveries of building material and equipment must not take place outside the hours of 7.00am to 5.00pm Monday to Friday and 8.00am to 12 noon Saturday. No work and no deliveries are to take place on Sundays and public holidays.
Excavation or removal of any materials using machinery of any kind, including compressors and jack hammers, must be limited to between 7.30am and 5.00pm Monday to Friday, with a respite break of 45 minutes between 12 noon 1.00pm.
Where it is necessary for works to occur outside of these hours (ie) placement of concrete for large floor areas on large residential/commercial developments or where building processes require the use of oversized trucks and/or cranes that are restricted by the RTA from travelling during daylight hours to deliver, erect or remove machinery, tower cranes, pre-cast panels, beams, tanks or service equipment to or from the site, approval for such activities will be subject to the issue of an "outside of hours works permit" from Council as well as notification of the surrounding properties likely to be affected by the proposed works.
Note: Failure to obtain a permit to work outside of the approved hours will result in on the spot fines being issued.
Reason: To ensure reasonable standards of amenity for occupants of neighbouring properties.
40. Approved plans to be on site
A copy of all approved and certified plans, specifications and documents incorporating conditions of consent and certification (including the Construction Certificate if required for the work) shall be kept on site at all times during the demolition, excavation and construction phases and must be readily available to any officer of Council or the Principal Certifying Authority.
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
41. Statement of compliance with Australian Standards
The demolition work shall comply with the provisions of Australian Standard AS2601: 2001 The Demolition of Structures. The work plans required by AS2601: 2001 shall be accompanied by a written statement from a suitably qualified person that the proposal contained in the work plan comply with the safety requirements of the Standard. The work plan and the statement of compliance shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the commencement of any works.
Reason: To ensure compliance with the Australian Standards.
42. Construction noise
During excavation, demolition and construction phases, noise generated from the site shall be controlled in accordance with the recommendations of the approved noise and vibration management plan.
Reason: To ensure reasonable standards of amenity to neighbouring properties.
43. Site notice
A site notice shall be erected on the site prior to any work commencing and shall be displayed throughout the works period.
The site notice must:
· be prominently displayed at the boundaries of the site for the purposes of informing the public that unauthorised entry to the site is not permitted · display project details including, but not limited to the details of the builder, Principal Certifying Authority and structural engineer · be durable and weatherproof · display the approved hours of work, the name of the site/project manager, the responsible managing company (if any), its address and 24 hour contact phone number for any inquiries, including construction/noise complaint are to be displayed on the site notice · be mounted at eye level on the perimeter hoardings/fencing and is to state that unauthorised entry to the site is not permitted
Reason: To ensure public safety and public information.
44. Dust control
During excavation, demolition and construction, adequate measures shall be taken to prevent dust from affecting the amenity of the neighbourhood. The following measures must be adopted:
· physical barriers shall be erected at right angles to the prevailing wind direction or shall be placed around or over dust sources to prevent wind or activity from generating dust · earthworks and scheduling activities shall be managed to coincide with the next stage of development to minimise the amount of time the site is left cut or exposed · all materials shall be stored or stockpiled at the best locations · the ground surface should be dampened slightly to prevent dust from becoming airborne but should not be wet to the extent that run-off occurs · all vehicles carrying spoil or rubble to or from the site shall at all times be covered to prevent the escape of dust · all equipment wheels shall be washed before exiting the site using manual or automated sprayers and drive-through washing bays · gates shall be closed between vehicle movements and shall be fitted with shade cloth · cleaning of footpaths and roadways shall be carried out daily
Reason: To protect the environment and amenity of surrounding properties.
45. Post-construction dilapidation report
The applicant shall engage a suitably qualified person to prepare a post construction dilapidation report at the completion of the construction works. This report is to ascertain whether the construction works created any structural damage to adjoining buildings, infrastructure and roads. The report is to be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority. In ascertaining whether adverse structural damage has occurred to adjoining buildings, infrastructure and roads, the Principal Certifying Authority must:
· compare the post-construction dilapidation report with the pre-construction dilapidation report · have written confirmation from the relevant authority that there is no adverse structural damage to their infrastructure and roads.
A copy of this report is to be forwarded to Council at the completion of the construction works.
Reason: Management of records.
46. Compliance with submitted geotechnical report
A contractor with specialist excavation experience must undertake the excavations for the development and a suitably qualified and consulting geotechnical engineer must oversee excavation.
Geotechnical aspects of the development work, namely:
· appropriate excavation method and vibration control · support and retention of excavated faces · hydro-geological considerations
must be undertaken in accordance with the recommendations of the Geotechnical Assessment prepared by JK Geotechnics Ref: 28560Zrpt dated 15 July 2015. Approval must be obtained from all affected property owners, including Ku-ring-gai Council, where rock anchors (both temporary and permanent) are proposed below adjoining property(ies).
Reason: To ensure the safety and protection of property.
47. Use of road or footpath
During excavation, demolition and construction phases, no building materials, plant or the like are to be stored on the road or footpath without written approval being obtained from Council beforehand. The pathway shall be kept in a clean, tidy and safe condition during building operations. Council reserves the right, without notice, to rectify any such breach and to charge the cost against the applicant/owner/builder, as the case may be.
Reason: To ensure safety and amenity of the area.
48. Guarding excavations
All excavation, demolition and construction works shall be properly guarded and protected with hoardings or fencing to prevent them from being dangerous to life and property.
Reason: To ensure public safety.
49. Toilet facilities
During excavation, demolition and construction phases, toilet facilities are to be provided, on the work site, at the rate of one toilet for every 20 persons or part of 20 persons employed at the site.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
50. Protection of public places
If the work involved in the erection, demolition or construction of the development is likely to cause pedestrian or vehicular traffic in a public place to be obstructed or rendered inconvenient, or building involves the enclosure of a public place, a hoarding or fence must be erected between the work site and the public place.
If necessary, a hoarding is to be erected, sufficient to prevent any substance from, or in connection with, the work falling into the public place.
The work site must be kept lit between sunset and sunrise if it is likely to be hazardous to persons in the public place.
Any hoarding, fence or awning is to be removed when the work has been completed.
Reason: To protect public places.
51. Recycling of building material (general)
During demolition and construction, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that building materials suitable for recycling have been forwarded to an appropriate registered business dealing in recycling of materials. Materials to be recycled must be kept in good order.
Reason: To facilitate recycling of materials.
52. Maintenance period for works in public road
A maintenance period of six (6) months applies to all work in the public road reserve carried out by the applicant - after the works have been completed to the satisfaction of Ku-ring-gai Council. In that maintenance period, the applicant shall be liable for any section of the public infrastructure work which fails to perform in the designed manner, or as would reasonably be expected under the operating conditions. The maintenance period shall commence once the applicant receives a formal letter from Council stating that the works involving public infrastructure have been completed satisfactorily.
Reason: To protect public infrastructure.
53. Road reserve safety
All public footways and roadways fronting and adjacent to the site must be maintained in a safe condition at all times during the course of the development works. Construction materials must not be stored in the road reserve. A safe pedestrian circulation route and a pavement/route free of trip hazards must be maintained at all times on or adjacent to any public access ways fronting the construction site. Where public infrastructure is damaged, repair works must be carried out when and as directed by Council officers. Where pedestrian circulation is diverted on to the roadway or verge areas, clear directional signage and protective barricades must be installed in accordance with AS1742-3 (1996) “Traffic Control Devices for Work on Roads”. If pedestrian circulation is not satisfactorily maintained across the site frontage, and action is not taken promptly to rectify the defects, Council may undertake proceedings to stop work.
Reason: To ensure safe public footways and roadways during construction.
54. Services
Where required, the adjustment or inclusion of any new utility service facilities must be carried out by the applicant and in accordance with the requirements of the relevant utility authority. These works shall be at no cost to Council. It is the applicants’ full responsibility to make contact with the relevant utility authorities to ascertain the impacts of the proposal upon utility services (including water, phone, gas and the like). Council accepts no responsibility for any matter arising from its approval to this application involving any influence upon utility services provided by another authority.
Reason: Provision of utility services.
55. Erosion control
Temporary sediment and erosion control and measures are to be installed prior to the commencement of any works on the site. These measures must be maintained in working order during construction works up to completion. All sediment traps must be cleared on a regular basis and after each major storm and/or as directed by the Principal Certifying Authority and Council officers.
Reason: To protect the environment from erosion and sedimentation.
56. Sydney Water Section 73 Compliance Certificate
The applicant must obtain a Section 73 Compliance Certificate under the Sydney Water Act 1994. An application must be made through an authorised Water Servicing CoOrdinator. The applicant is to refer to “Your Business” section of Sydney Water’s web site at www.sydneywater.com.au then the “e-develop” icon or telephone 13 20 92. Following application a “Notice of Requirements” will detail water and sewer extensions to be built and charges to be paid. Please make early contact with the CoOrdinator, since building of water/sewer extensions can be time consuming and may impact on other services and building, driveway or landscape design.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
57. Screen planting
The proposed paving and privacy screen adjacent to the building entry are to be set back 800mm from the northern boundary in line with the proposed screening to the entry path. An additional 4 x Camellia sasanqua (Chinese Camellia) are to be provided within this setback.
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
58. Arborist’s report
The trees to be retained shall be inspected and monitored by an AQF Level 5 Arborist in accordance with AS4970-2009 during and after completion of development works to ensure their long term survival. Regular inspections and documentation from the project arborist to the Principal Certifying Authority are required at the following times or phases of work. All reports should include dated, a brief description of the trees inspected, and any mitigation works prescribed. An arborist report prepared by About Trees, dated 27/11/13, has been submitted as part of the application. Tree numbers refer to this report.
All works as recommended by the project arborist are to be undertaken by an experienced arborist with a minimum AQF Level 3 qualification.
Reason: To ensure protection of existing trees.
59. Trees on nature strip
Removal/pruning of the following tree/s from Council's nature strip to permit vehicular access shall be undertaken at no cost to Council by an experienced tree removal contractor/arborist holding public liability insurance amounting to a minimum cover of $10,000,000:
Reason: To ensure protection of existing trees.
60. Treatment of tree roots
If tree roots are required to be severed for the purposes of constructing the approved works, they shall be cut cleanly by hand, by an experienced Arborist/Horticulturist with a minimum qualification of Horticulture Certificate or Tree Surgery Certificate. All pruning works shall be undertaken as specified in Australian Standard 4373-2007 – Pruning of Amenity Trees.
Reason: To protect existing trees.
61. Excavation near trees
No mechanical excavation shall be undertaken within the specified radius of the trunk/s of the following tree/s until root pruning by hand along the perimeter line of such works is completed.
Reason: To protect existing trees.
62. Hand excavation
All excavation, excluding for basement, within the specified radius of the trunk(s) of the following tree(s) shall be hand dug. No tree roots of 50mm or greater in diameter located within the specified radius of the trunk(s) of the following, tree(s) shall be severed or injured in the process of any hand excavation.
Reason: To protect existing trees.
63. No storage of materials beneath trees
No activities, storage or disposal of materials shall take place beneath the canopy of any tree protected under Council's Tree Preservation Order at any time.
Reason: To protect existing trees.
64. Tree planting on nature strip
The following tree species shall be planted, at no cost to Council, in the nature strip fronting the property along (enter street). The tree/s used shall be a minimum 25 litres container size specimen/s:
Reason: To provide appropriate landscaping within the streetscape.
65. Tree removal on nature strip
Following removal of the (enter tree species) from Council's nature strip, the nature strip shall be rehabilitated to the satisfaction of Council’s Landscape Assessment Officer at no cost to Council.
Reason: To protect the streetscape.
66. Supervision of transplanting
Transplanting of the following tree shall be directly supervised by an experienced arborist/horticulturist with a minimum qualification of Horticulture Certificate or Tree Surgery Certificate.
Reason: To protect the trees during transplanting.
67. Removal of refuse
All builders' refuse, spoil and/or material unsuitable for use in landscape areas shall be removed from the site on completion of the building works.
Reason: To protect the environment.
68. Canopy replenishment trees to be planted
The canopy replenishment trees to be planted shall be maintained in a healthy and vigorous condition until they attain a height of 5.0 metres whereby they will be protected by Council’s Tree Preservation Order. Any of the trees found faulty, damaged, dying or dead shall be replaced with the same species.
Reason: To maintain the treed character of the area.
69. Survey and inspection of waste collection clearance and path of travel
At the stage when formwork for the ground floor slab is in place and prior to concrete being poured, a registered surveyor is to:
· ascertain the reduced level of the underside of the slab at the driveway entry, · certify that the level is not lower than the level shown on the approved DA plans; and · certify that the minimum headroom of 2.6 metres will be available for the full path of travel of the small waste collection vehicle from the street to the collection area. · This certification is to be provided to Council’s Development Engineer prior to any concrete being poured for the ground floor slab. · No work is to proceed until Council has undertaken an inspection to determine clearance and path of travel.
At the stage when formwork for the ground floor slab is in place and prior to concrete being poured, Council’s Development Engineer and Manager Waste Services are to carry out an inspection of the site to confirm the clearance available for the full path of travel of the small waste collection vehicle from the street to the collection area. This inspection may not be carried out by a private certifier because waste management is not a matter listed in Clause 161 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000.
Reason: To ensure access will be available for Council’s contractors to collect waste from the collection point.
70. On site retention of waste dockets
All demolition, excavation and construction waste dockets are to be retained on site, or at suitable location, in order to confirm which facility received materials generated from the site for recycling or disposal.
· Each docket is to be an official receipt from a facility authorised to accept the material type, for disposal or processing. · This information is to be made available at the request of an Authorised Officer of Council.
Reason: To protect the environment.
71. Archival recording of buildings
Prior to the commencement of any development or excavation works on site, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that an archival report has been submitted to Council’s Heritage Advisor.
The report must consist of an archival standard photographic record of the building (internally and externally), its garden and views of it from the street illustrating its relationship to neighbouring properties and the streetscape. Recording shall be undertaken in accordance with the guidelines for “Photographic Recording of Heritage Items Using Film or Digital Capture (2006)” prepared by the New South Wales Heritage Office.
Information shall be bound in an A4 report format. It shall include copies of photographs, referenced to plans of the site. Two (2) copies (one (1) copy to include negatives or CD of images shall be submitted to Council's Heritage Advisor. The recording document will be held in the local studies collection of Ku-ring-gai Library, the local historical society and Council’s files.
Note: A written acknowledgment from Council must be obtained (attesting to this condition being appropriately satisfied) and submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the commencement of any works.
Reason: To ensure the proper management of historical artefacts and to ensure their preservation.
72. Archaeology
In accordance with Section 146 of the NSW Heritage Act, during the demolition, excavation or construction works; if any deposits, objects or relics are uncovered; the works are to stop immediately and the NSW Heritage Council notified of the discovery.
Depending on the nature of the discovery and advice from the NSW Heritage Council, an application for an excavation permit under Section 140 of the NSW Heritage Act may be required to be made.
Reason: To be consistent with the relic provision of the NSW Heritage Act (1977).
73. Recycling of building materials to be removed
During demolition and construction, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that, in addition to building materials generally suitable for recycling, the following materials are to be recycled and reused on the site in landscaping woks. The recycled materials must be kept in good order. Other materials generally suitable for recycling including interior components of the building are to be forwarded to an appropriate registered business dealing in recycling of materials. All materials to be recycled must be kept in good order.
Stone salvaged form demolition works to be re-used in the proposed landscaping works.
Reason: To facilitate recycling of materials and conservation of the fabric.
Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate:
74. Easement for waste collection
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, an easement for waste collection is to be created under Section 88B of the Conveyancing Act 1919. This is to permit legal access for Council, Council’s contractors and their vehicles over the subject property for the purpose of collecting waste from the property. The terms of the easement are to be generally in accordance with Council’s draft terms for an easement for waste collection and shall be to the satisfaction of Council’s Development Engineer.
Reason: To permit legal access for Council, Council’s contractors and their vehicles over the subject site for waste collection.
75. Compliance with BASIX Certificate
Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that all commitments listed in BASIX Certificate No. 654917M_03 have been complied with.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
76. Clotheslines and clothes dryers
Prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the units either have access to an external clothes line located in common open space or have a mechanical clothes dryer installed.
Reason: To provide access to clothes drying facilities.
77. Completion of landscape works
Prior to the release of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that all landscape works have been undertaken in accordance with the approved plan(s) and conditions of consent.
Reason: To ensure that the landscape works are consistent with the development consent.
78. Completion of tree works
Prior to the release of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that all tree works, including transplanting and pruning in accordance with AS4373-2007, have been undertaken in accordance with the approved plan(s) and conditions of consent. All monitoring reports shall be provided to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the release of the Occupation Certificate.
Reason: To ensure that the tree works are consistent with the development consent.
79. Retention and re-use positive covenant
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the applicant must create a positive covenant and restriction on the use of land under Section 88E of the Conveyancing Act 1919, burdening the property with the requirement to maintain the site stormwater retention and re-use facilities on the property.
The terms of the instruments are to be generally in accordance with the Council's "draft terms of Section 88B instruments for protection of retention and re-use facilities" and to the satisfaction of Council (refer to Council’s Local Centres DCP Volume C Part 4R.9). For existing titles, the positive covenant and the restriction on the use of land is to be created through an application to the Land Titles Office in the form of a request using forms 13PC and 13RPA. The relative location of the reuse and retention facility, in relation to the building footprint, must be shown on a scale sketch, attached as an annexure to the request forms.
Registered title documents showing the covenants and restrictions must be submitted to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate.
Reason: To protect the environment.
80. Certification of drainage works
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that:
· the stormwater drainage works have been satisfactorily completed in accordance with the approved Construction Certificate drainage plans · the minimum retention and on-site detention storage volume requirements of BASIX and Council’s Local Centres DCP Volume C Part 4B.5 respectively, have been achieved · retained water is connected and available for use · basement and subsoil areas are able to drain via a pump/sump system installed in accordance with AS3500.3 and Council’s Local Centres DCP Volume C Part 4R.6 · all grates potentially accessible by children are secured · components of the new drainage system have been installed by a licensed plumbing contractor in accordance with the Plumbing and Drainage Code AS3500.3 2003 and the Building Code of Australia · all enclosed floor areas, including habitable and garage floor levels, are safeguarded from outside stormwater runoff ingress by suitable differences in finished levels, gradings and provision of stormwater collection devices
Note: Evidence from a qualified and experienced consulting civil/hydraulic engineer documenting compliance with the above is to be provided to Council prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate.
Reason: To protect the environment.
81. WAE plans for stormwater management and disposal (dual occupancy and above)
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, a registered surveyor must provide a works as executed survey of the completed stormwater drainage and management systems. The survey must be submitted to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate. The survey must indicate:
· as built (reduced) surface and invert levels for all drainage pits · gradients of drainage lines, materials and dimensions · as built (reduced) level(s) at the approved point of discharge to the public drainage system · as built location and internal dimensions of all detention and retention structures on the property (in plan view) and horizontal distances to nearest adjacent boundaries and structures on site · the achieved storage volumes of the installed retention and detention storages and derivative calculations · as built locations of all access pits and grates in the detention and retention system(s), including dimensions · the size of the orifice or control fitted to any on-site detention system · dimensions of the discharge control pit and access grates · the maximum depth of storage possible over the outlet control · top water levels of storage areas and indicative RL’s through the overland flow path in the event of blockage of the on-site detention system
The works as executed plan(s) must show the as built details above in comparison to those shown on the drainage plans approved with the Construction Certificate prior to commencement of works. All relevant levels and details indicated must be marked in red on a copy of the Principal Certifying Authority stamped construction certificate stormwater plans.
Reason: To protect the environment.
82. Basement pump-out maintenance
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a maintenance regime has been prepared for the basement stormwater pump-out system.
Note: A maintenance regime specifying that the system is to be regularly inspected and checked by qualified practitioners is to be prepared by a suitable qualified professional and provided to the Principal Certifying Authority.
Reason: To protect the environment.
83. OSD positive covenant/restriction
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the applicant must create a positive covenant and restriction on the use of land under Section 88E of the Conveyancing Act 1919, burdening the owner with the requirement to maintain the on-site stormwater detention facilities on the lot.
The terms of the instruments are to be generally in accordance with the Council's "draft terms of Section 88B instrument for protection of on-site detention facilities" and to the satisfaction of Council (refer to Council’s Local Centres DCP Volume C Part 4R.9). For existing titles, the positive covenant and the restriction on the use of land is to be created through an application to the Land Titles Office in the form of a request using forms 13PC and 13RPA. The relative location of the on-site detention facility, in relation to the building footprint, must be shown on a scale sketch, attached as an annexure to the request forms.
Registered title documents, showing the covenants and restrictions, must be submitted and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate.
Reason: To protect the environment.
84. Sydney Water Section 73 Compliance Certificate
Prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate the Section 73 Sydney water Compliance Certificate must be obtained and submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority
Reason: Statutory requirement.
85. Certification of as-constructed driveway/carpark – RFB
Prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that:
§ the as-constructed car park complies with the approved Construction Certificate plans
§ the completed vehicle access and accommodation arrangements comply with Australian Standard 2890.1 – 2004 “Off-Street car parking" and the Seniors Living State Environment Planning Policy in terms of minimum parking space dimensions
§ finished driveway gradients and transitions will not result in the scraping of the underside of cars
§ no doors, gates, grilles or other structures have been provided in the access driveways to the basement carpark, which would prevent unrestricted access for internal garbage collection from the basement garbage storage and collection area
§ the vehicular headroom requirements of: - Australian Standard 2890.1 – “Off-street car parking”, - The Seniors Living SEPP (as last amended) for accessible parking spaces, - 2.6 metres height clearance for waste collection trucks (refer DCP 40) are met from the public street into and within the applicable areas of the basement carpark.
Note: Evidence from a suitably qualified and experienced traffic/civil engineer indicating compliance with the above is to be provided to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate.
Reason: To ensure that vehicular access and accommodation areas are compliant with the consent.
86. Reinstatement of redundant crossings and completion of infrastructure works
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority must be satisfied that he or she has received a signed inspection form from Council which states that the following works in the road reserve have been completed:
· new concrete driveway crossing in accordance with levels and specifications issued by Council · removal of all redundant driveway crossings and kerb laybacks (or sections thereof) and reinstatement of these areas to footpath, turfed verge and upright kerb and gutter (reinstatement works to match surrounding adjacent infrastructure with respect to integration of levels and materials) · full repair and resealing of any road surface damaged during construction · full replacement of damaged sections of grass verge to match existing
This inspection may not be carried out by the Private Certifier because restoration of Council property outside the boundary of the site is not a matter listed in Clause 161 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000.
All works must be completed in accordance with the General Specification for the Construction of Road and Drainage Works in Ku-ring-gai Council, dated November 2004. The Occupation Certificate must not be issued until all damaged public infrastructure caused as a result of construction works on the subject site (including damage caused by, but not limited to, delivery vehicles, waste collection, contractors, sub contractors, concrete vehicles) is fully repaired to the satisfaction of Council. Repair works shall be at no cost to Council.
Reason: To protect the streetscape.
87. Infrastructure repair
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority must be satisfied that any damaged public infrastructure caused as a result of construction works (including damage caused by, but not limited to, delivery vehicles, waste collection, contractors, sub contractors, concrete vehicles) is fully repaired to the satisfaction of Council Development Engineer and at no cost to Council.
Reason: To protect public infrastructure.
88. Fire safety certificate
Prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a Fire Safety Certificate for all the essential fire or other safety measures forming part of this consent has been completed and provided to Council.
Note: A copy of the Fire Safety Certificate must be submitted to Council.
Reason: To ensure suitable fire safety measures are in place.
Conditions to be satisfied at all times:
89. Annual fire safety statement
Each 12 months after the installation of essential fire or other safety measures, the owner of a building must cause the Council to be given an Annual Fire Safety Statement for the building. In addition a copy of the statement must be given to the NSW Fire Commissioner and a copy displayed prominently in the building.
Reason: To ensure statutory maintenance of essential fire safety measures.
|
Adam Richardson Executive Assessment Officer |
Richard Kinninmont Team Leader - Development Assessment North |
Corrie Swanepoel Manager Development Assessment Services |
Michael Miocic Director Development & Regulation |
Location Sketch |
|
2016/002980 |
||
|
Zoning Extract |
|
2016/002977 |
|
|
Site Plan |
|
2015/333343 |
|
|
Basement Plan |
|
2016/002576 |
|
|
Ground Floor plan |
|
2015/333289 |
|
|
First Floor Plan |
|
2015/333295 |
|
|
Second Floor Plan |
|
2015/333308 |
|
|
Roof Plan |
|
2015/333346 |
|
|
Elevations |
|
2015/333354 |
|
|
Sections |
|
2015/333317 |
|
|
Landscape Plan |
|
2015/333204 |
|
|
Stormwater Plan |
|
2015/342139 |
|
|
Urban Design Assessment |
|
2016/022859 |
|
|
ADG Assessment |
|
2016/022857 |
|
Item No: GB.5 |
The following amended report is in response to amended drawings and additional information received 18th January 2016 and 28th January 2016.
The application has now satisfied all Design Quality components and satisfies the ADG. Therefore the application can be supported on urban design grounds.
The applicant’s responsive approach to urban design requirements arising from the introduction of Amendment No 3 of SEPP 65 and newly implemented ADG is to be commended.
There will likely be further amendments to some threshold details during CC and construction documentation. However, the submitted façade sections indicate the design can comply with statutory requirements for construction, that the aesthetic response can deliver a level of façade detail consistent with the approved design, and thus, achieve the desired quality of architectural character intended under Council’s LEP and DCP.
Introduction
The subject site is located on the side of the Pacific Highway and is within 200 metres of shops, services, communal facilities and transport available in the Turramurra Local Centre. Turramurra Railway Station is within 400 metres walking distance on gently undulating topography.
Topography is gentle sloping from a high point of RL 165.50 at the south-western corner to the low point of RL164.68 at the north-east corner.
Total site area is 1524 square metres comprising a single residential lot on which is an existing single storey brick dwelling.
The following KLEP_LC 2012 development controls apply:
Land use: R4
Height: 11.5 metres
FSR: 0.8:1
The proposed development is for 8 apartments within one building, served by one lift. Apartments are accommodated in the following mix:
Studios 0 units 0%
1-bedroom 0 units 0%
2-bedroom 1 units 12.5%
3-bedroom 7 units 87.5%
Car parking for 18 cars is accommodated over one basement level. Spaces comprise 16 resident and 2 visitor spaces that include provision of 2 disabled spaces as well as a loading area, garbage room, and storage for resident use. No provision for bicycles or motor bike parking is proposed.
NOTE: SEPP 65 now establishes a clear link from ADG through to the EP&A Regulation. Therefore, if the ADG design guidance and design criteria are demonstrated in a design, the ADG objectives will be satisfied. If the ADG objectives are satisfied, the SEPP 65 Design Quality Principles will be satisfied, and therefore SEPP 65 and the EP&A Regulation can be satisfied.
EP&A Regulation cl 50(1AB)(b) includes important changes to the design verification statement (DVS) that requires careful consideration by the architect and better captures the relationship between the DVs and design drawings (and all submission documents) as follows (my bold and italics):
provide an explanation that verifies how the development:
(i) addresses how the design quality principles are achieved, and
(ii) demonstrates, in terms of the Apartment Design Guide, how the objectives in Parts 3 and 4 of that guide have been achieved.
It is to be noted that a checklist table will not demonstrate how the design has responded to the specific site conditions and how it has achieved the objectives of the ADG Parts 3 and 4.
The DVS needs to explain how ADG Part 3 information (3A site and context analysis) has informed the design response, and demonstrate that the design strategy (3B to 3J), and detailed design of Part 4 has been in direct response to those specific site conditions (3A). Failure to do so, therefore, means the proposed design cannot satisfy the EP&A or SEPP 65, and fails the first test.
Nine design quality principles
|
Apartment Design Guide (Amendments / clarification required to satisfy ADG design objectives, criteria and/or guidance) |
Principle 1 – Context and Neighbourhood Character Good design responds and contributes to its context. Context is the key natural and built features of an area, their relationship and the character they create when combined. It also includes social, economic, health and environmental conditions. Responding to context involves identifying the desirable elements of an area’s existing or future character. Well designed buildings respond to and enhance the qualities and identity of the area including the adjacent sites, streetscape and neighbourhood. Consideration of local context is important for all sites, including sites in established areas, those undergoing change or identified for change. |
|
Satisfactory. |
|
1. The area is undergoing transition with a variety of land use zones and building height controls in the vicinity and adjacent to the subject site. The proposal is a small apartment development (8 units over 3 residential storeys) and achieves a context that contributes to the emerging character (based on site visit). Note: submitted site analysis was inadequate in describing the surrounding urban context and site conditions. 2. Same developer/architect developed the neighbouring site (17 Turramurra Ave), which has potentially given a greater degree of control over the architectural outcome of the subject development particularly where building separations may be an issue. 3. Proposal demonstrates consideration of neighbouring properties and their differing contextual conditions (the heritage item of a detached brick dwelling at No 2 Nulla Nulla St, R3 zoned site to the east and R4 development to the north) by increasing the southern setback, use of screens, locating the communal open space to the front setback (instead of the rear or side). It is acknowledged that the building separation for the zone interface has been satisfied under Council’s DCP requirements despite the ADG having more onerous zone interface requirements. It may have been prudent for the application to indicate likely development on No 4 Nulla Nulla Street so that the ADG (as well as the DCP objectives) were demonstrated at the zone interface rather than limiting the context/site analysis to the north and south of the site. 4. Proposed architectural expression will make a positive contribution to the urban fabric. 5. The composition of finishes contributes positively to the streetscape character through its integration with the building elements and the selection of a variety of materials and textures. 6. The building entry is proposed along the northern side rather than directly from the street to the front of the building. The proposal has adequately mitigated issues by providing a secure gate that is in the direct line of sight from the street. This results in a ‘front door’ effect satisfying ADG Objective 3C-1 and KDCP_LC 2012 7C.8. 7. The location of the communal open space in the front setback zone, though contrary to KDCP_LC 2012 7C.1 (3) requiring it be behind the building line, achieves a positive transition from the public domain to the privacy within the building. Screen planting and operable screens achieve flexibility to adjust desired privacy levels for future residents satisfying ADG Objectives 3G-1, and 3G-2 for building entries and KDCP_LC 2012 7C.1. Therefore, the integrated resolution of the building entry, communal open space, ground floor terrace of Unit 1 and the landscape achieves a positive public domain interface consistent with ADG Objective 3C-2 Public Domain Interface.
|
· Section 3A Site Analysis – observation Site analysis (or other architectural drawings) did not provide diagrammatic evidence of the relationship between openings in the proposed development and those of foreseeable R3 development at No 4 Nulla Nulla Street. This information is important in the site analysis where a variation to the ADG Objective 3F.1 Design Guidance for setbacks at the zone interface with lower zoned sites is sought and where reduced building separation had been sought to the north. Unless this information is contained on the drawings, there is no way to assess the impact for the sought variation and it cannot be supported on urban design grounds. The planning report likewise cannot justify a variation for which there is no graphic evidence to support the claims. This requirement goes to cl 50(1AB)(b) of the EP&A Regulation that requires design verification to “demonstrate” Part 3 Siting the Development and Part 4 Designing the Building of the ADG. If the information is not contained on the architectural documents, it cannot be demonstrated and cannot satisfy the Regulation. The Planning Letter (Moody and Doyle dated 7th December 2015) cites Seaside Property Development Pty Ltd v Wyong Shire Council [2004] NSW LEC 117. This is not accepted. It is to be noted that at par 16 Commissioner Bly found the cited development reasonable because it satisfied the requirements of AMCORD (the equivalent of today’s ADG) for building separation. This differs to the subject development, which may not satisfy the ADG building separation requirements at the zone interface, and hence is inconsistent with the conditions cited in the planning principle. At par 25 (the nominated planning principle paragraph), it is noted that it is reasonable to expect that different zones result in the juxtaposition of developments of differing scale and bulk. (This is not challenged in the subject development.) Commissioner Bly goes on to say “in considering the likely future character of development on the other side of the interface it may be that the development of sites such as this may not be able to achieve the full potential otherwise indicated by applicable development standards and the like.” It is to be further noted that at par 29, the application was found to be fatal because it did not achieve landscape setback zones that were “responsive to its surroundings and would not be adequate in terms of the likely future character of the area.” Therefore it is reasonable that submitted architectural documents provide evidence of the landscape character, rhythm of built form to landscape, and privacy concerns raised by the sought variations to setbacks for the zone interface so that it can be judged on its merits. In this instance, however, the application has been found to be acceptable on merit following a detailed site visit, additional aerial photographic images submitted by the applicant, and amended design. |
Principle 2 - Built Form and Scale Good design achieves a scale, bulk and height appropriate to the existing or desired future character of the street and surrounding buildings. Good design also achieves an appropriate built form for a site and the building’s purpose in terms of building alignments, proportions, building type, articulation and the manipulation of building elements. Appropriate built form defines the public domain, contributes to the character of streetscapes and parks, including their views and vistas, and provides internal amenity and outlook. |
|
Satisfactory. |
|
1. Proposed development is within the permitted height and FSR. 2. The building envelope has been significantly articulated to satisfactorily address the interface character between the heritage item neighbouring to the south and lower zoned properties to the east. The top floor setbacks are varied to satisfactorily address the differing interface conditions of each boundary and the roof form provides sufficient character (although it is noted that the deep eaves of the preDA scheme have been paired back). 3. The composition of all elevations has been considered demonstrating coordination and integration of building elements and internal planning when viewed as a 3-dimensional object in the urban environment. ADG Objectives 4M-1 and 4M-2 Facades, 4N-1 Roof design and their respective design guidance are satisfied as is KDCP_LC 2012 7C.10 Building Facades and 7C.12 Top Storey Design and Roof Forms. 4. Setbacks to the northern boundary do not achieve ADG Objective 3F-1 building separations. While information can be partially extrapolated from the submitted drawings, it should be noted that future applications should be better documented as a graphic representation both to demonstrate the areas of non-compliance and devices/design strategies used to satisfy the visual privacy requirements of the ADG. 5. Setbacks to the eastern boundary do not achieve ADG 3F-1 Visual Privacy design guidance for setbacks on sites with an interface to lower zoned properties. The component of built form encroaching on the required 9 metre setback (KDCP_LC 2012 7A.1 (9)) is considered to have been adequately mitigated by the use of operable privacy screens, a deep soil setback that will enable significant screening landscape, in combination with the scale of the proposal that will appear as 2 storeys with the top floor significantly set back from the eastern boundary.
|
· SEPP 65 Cl 6A (a) Visual Privacy and ADG 3F Building Separation Objective 3F-1, design criteria 1, and guidance and Objective 3F-2 and guidance Amended documents have provided information regarding the location and size of openings on the neighbouring property No 17 Turramurra Avenue and the scale of both buildings with the 4th storey of each set back from the shared boundary. This demonstrates an acceptable relationship between the proposed development’s floor levels, sill and head heights of openings and how privacy impacts have been mitigated to satisfy ADG 2F aims for appropriate scale, visual privacy, and deep soil zones; 2H for access to light and air, rhythm or space to built form in the streetscape and as a transition from higher density R4 development. See Principle 1 above for comments on setbacks at the zone interface and locations of proposed openings/balconies and the relationship to foreseeable future development on No 4 Nulla Nulla Street.
|
Principle 3 – Density Good design achieves a high levels of amenity for residents and each apartment, resulting in a density appropriate to the site and its context. Appropriate densities are consistent with the area’s existing or projected population. Appropriate densities can be sustained by existing or proposed infrastructure, public transport, access to jobs, community facilities and the environment. |
|
Satisfactory. |
|
1. Proposed development is within the permitted FSR. 2. Apartment yield is 8 dwellings which enables larger models of the 3 and 2 bedroom typologies. 3. Apartments are efficiently planned which maximises amenity and opportunities for flexible use.
|
|
Principle 4 – Sustainability Good design combines positive environmental, social and economic outcomes. Good sustainable design includes use of natural cross ventilation and sunlight for the amenity and liveability of residents and passive thermal design for ventilation, heating and cooling reducing reliance on technology and operation costs. Other elements include recycling and reuse of materials and waste, use of sustainable materials, and deep soil zones for groundwater recharge and vegetation. (See additional Note 1 at end of report) |
|
Satisfactory. |
|
1. All units are cross ventilated with a minimum of 2 aspects. 2. All units achieve high levels and solar and daylight access. 3. Elements of the landscape walls and entry will reuse materials from the site. 4. Deep soil is consistent with KDCP_LC 2012 Cl 7A.4 (1) but does not achieve ADG Deep Soil 3E-1, design criteria 1 that requires deep soil on sites greater than 1500m2 to have a minimum dimension of 6 metres. While the zone is R4, the permitted building height is 11.5 metres. From an urban design perspective, the overall objective is satisfied due to a combination of scale of development (3 storeys with top storey significantly set back from the building edge) which presents as a similar scale to development adjacent on 17 Turramurra Ave and lower scale development to the south and east; and landscape including replacement of trees that will be removed. 5. Recycled rainwater is to be used in landscape irrigation, toilet flushing and the car wash bay consistent with ADG 4V Water Management and Conservation Objectives 4V-1, 4V-2 and 4V-3. 6. Materials selection includes natural materials that do not require constant maintenance (such as painted render) and all habitable rooms are above adjacent ground levels reducing one aspect of the potential for water penetration over time thus satisfying ADG 4U Energy Efficiency Objectives 4U-1, 4U-2 and 4U-3. (See also Note 1 at end of this report.)
|
|
Principle 5 – Landscape Good design recognises that together landscape and buildings operate as an integrated and sustainable system, resulting in attractive developments with good amenity. A positive image and contextual fit of well designed developments is achieved by contributing to the landscape character of the streetscape and neighbourhood. Good landscape design enhances the development’s environmental performance by retaining positive natural features which contribute to the local context, coordinating water and soil management, solar access, micro-climate, tree canopy, habitat values, and preserving networks. Good landscape design optimises usability, privacy and opportunities for social interaction, equitable access, respect for neighbours’ amenity, provides for practical establishment and long term management. |
|
Satisfactory. |
|
1. Built form responds to the scale of existing large trees and integration of proposed landscape. 2. Proposed communal open space in the front setback achieves good amenity for future residents and a positive interface with the street that demonstrates a rational transition between public/communal/private zones. While Cl 7C.1 (3) of KDCP_LC 2012 is not met with the location of COS in front of the building line, we find the proposed solution satisfactorily addresses the objectives as a response to the specific site conditions - aspect to north, proximity of low density development to the east and south - which satisfies ADG 3D Communal and public open space Objectives 3D-1, 3D-2 and 3D-3. 3. COS is clearly differentiated from adjacent private open space of Unit 1 through the coordinated use of architectural devices (internal spaces well set back with generously deep terraces, operable screens) and landscape (screen planting). However, better use should be made of integrating areas of solid balustrading with glass balustrades to satisfy ADG Objective 4E-3 and design guidance.
|
· ADG 4E Private Open Space and Balconies Objective 4E-3 amendments have integrated solid areas of balustrading both to enhance privacy options and break up the full width, full height transparent glass balustrading. This also provides for opportunities to screen clothes drying if on balconies. The inclusion of operable external screens adds further flexibility to levels of transparency and desired privacy.
|
Principle 6 – Amenity Good design positively influence internal and external amenity for residents and neighbours. Achieving good amenity contributes to positive living environments and resident well-being. Good amenity combines appropriate room dimensions and shapes, access to sunlight, natural ventilation, outlook, visual and acoustic privacy, storage, indoor and outdoor space, efficient layouts and service areas, and ease of access for all age groups and degrees of mobility. |
|
Satisfactory. |
|
1. Overall, the amenity of future residents will be high being a small scale apartment development of generous sized apartments, with well-planned layouts, high levels of solar and daylight access to all primary habitable spaces, high levels of natural and cross ventilation, generous private open spaces and well coordinated communal spaces and circulation spaces offering high levels of natural light, solar access and natural ventilation. 2. Studies - in Units 1 and 4 are borrowing daylight and air from the living room contrary to ADG Apartment Size and Layout Objective 4D-1 design criteria 2 and design guidance. It is noted they are a generous size and will still achieve the maximum depth of room consistent with ADG 4B Objective 4B-2 and figure 4D.3.
|
· It is suggested that Units 1 and 4 could swap the location of kitchens and study alcoves. However, it is to be noted this is not a high priority. · Unit 2 and 5 studies detailed below and that the ADG provisions for natural light within an open plan arrangement are achieved and therefore are accepted. · Further amendments have been submitted regarding Unit 2 and 5 studies. Space has been reallocated to remove the studies. This also provides additional storage for Units 3 and 6 adjacent.
|
Principle 7 – Safety Good design optimises safety and security within the development and the public domain. It provides for quality public and private spaces that are clearly defined and fit for the intended purpose. Opportunities to maximize passive surveillance of public and communal areas promote safety. A positive relationship between public and private spaces is achieved through clearly defined secure access points and well lit and visible areas that are easily maintained and appropriate to the location and purpose. |
|
Satisfactory. |
|
1. Clear lines of sight are achieved from dwellings to all communal spaces and from units addressing Turramurra Avenue. 2. There are clearly defined public, communal and private zones throughout the development. 3. The street entry is well defined at the boundary and provides a clear line of sight and direct path of travel that leads to a secure gate/portico that addresses issues of potential furtive spaces where side entries are proposed. 4. Pedestrian and vehicular entries have been separated, which also maximises the perceived front landscape area through the consolidation of space.
|
|
Principle 8 – Housing Diversity and Social Interaction Good design achieves a mix of apartment sizes, providing housing choice for different demographics, living needs and household budgets. Well designed apartment developments respond to social context by providing housing and facilities to suit the existing and future social mix. Good design involves practical and flexible features, including different types of communal spaces for a broad range of people, providing opportunities for social interaction amongst residents. |
|
Satisfactory. |
|
1. While the proposed development is small scale, providing a predominance of 3 bedroom units (7 x 3-bedroom, 1 x 2-bedroom), it makes a very positive contribution to housing choice within the Turramurra local centre. The majority of developments currently seem weighted towards smaller sized units overall and of 1 and two bedrooms with very few larger sized offering 3 bedrooms. 2. The proposed unit mix and layouts can achieve Silver Level Universal Planning for flexibility consistent with ADG 4Q Objectives 4Q-1, 4Q-2 and 4Q-3 and ADG 4K Apartment Mix Objectives 4K-1 and 4-2. 3. The location of the primary communal open space can achieve satisfactory privacy from the street and residents within the development while also encouraging interaction between residents and the broader community should they wish.
|
· Ensure achieving Livable Housing Guideline Silver Level – separate to the adaptable housing requirements is conditioned for construction certificate. |
Principle 9 – Aesthetics Good design achieves a built form that has good proportions and a balanced composition of elements, reflecting the internal layout and structure. Good design uses a variety of materials, colours and textures. The visual appearance of well designed apartment development responds to the existing or future local context, particularly desirable elements and repetitions of the streetscape.
|
|
Satisfactory. |
|
1. The proposed aesthetic presents a positive urban outcome. The spatial hierarchy of internal layout is clearly expressed in all facades. 2. There is a disciplined composition of building elements that is well proportioned and demonstrates cohesion both vertically and horizontally. 3. The use of materials achieves an interesting visual interface to the street and neighbouring properties that has been well integrated with the built form as a holistic design response. 4. The use of natural materials and materials with lower maintenance requirements will promote longevity of the building and maximise the positive contribution a building can make over time. 5. Façade details including balcony edges to be submitted. The impact of weathering over the life of a building is an important aspect of the aesthetic and needs to be demonstrated that controlled weathering that minimises maintenance is achieved.
|
· Further additional information has provided detailed section drawings of the proposed façades consistent with the ADG DA document checklist Appendix 4.. It is to be noted that substituting materials and subsequent changes to edge detailing and junctions of materials (post DA approval) can have a detrimental effect on a building’s character and its contribution to the streetscape and wider urban fabric. · The detailed sections submitted 28th January can provide rebates to prevent water ingress between the external and internal wall skins/interiors or sufficient allowance for window/door frames. The position of windows and frames can provide setdowns of all floor slabs. Further consideration should be considered to accommodate the external wall skins that would further resist water ingress and simplify flashing.
|
Amendments: None |
|
Additional information: None |
|
Recommendation: |
|
The proposal can be supported. |
Principle 4 – Sustainability
Note 1: Research from the City Future Research Centre - UNSW Faculty of the Built Environment (2012)* has found inadequate water-proofing to be a major component of non-compliance with the BCA resulting in significant building defects in new construction. The reliance upon waterproofing products, correct application, and possibly insufficient construction detailing is to be avoided. In our experience, a physical separation of ground to external walls of residential buildings needs to be demonstrated at DA stage to provide some protection against the inevitable changes to product selection, and/or construction detailing and/or poor quality construction that can occur and thus mitigate avoidable and expensive remediation with little or no recourse for residents to recoup costs from the builder.
It is also to be noted that there are current (as at August 2015) legal proceedings filed in New Zealand’s High Court and a separate class action against James Hardie for faulty Harditex cladding systems resulting in water damage. Australian litigants have been included in the action. (Adina Thorn Lawyers announcement 19th August 2015 – Plaster cladding class action).
These are indicative of the importance of good design practice at preDA and development application stage in mitigating future issues.
· Governing the Compact City: The role and effectiveness of strata management’, Dr H Easthope UNSW 2012. Summary UNSW 21 May 2012 states: 70% strata owners overall reported one or more building defects including internal water leaks, cracks and water seeping in from outside the building. A total 85% of strata title owners in buildings built since 2000 said there were defects in the construction of which 75% were not rectified due to builder/developer controlling the project and delaying rectification and/or going out of business and/or [registered as single-development companies that] cease to exist post construction so no recourse for rectification.
· Dealing with Defects, B Cooper, K M Brown (H Easthope & S Holliday) 2014. Also cites NSW Government (NSW Fair Trading) (2013) Strata Title Law Reform: Strata and Community Title Law Reform Position Paper(http://www.fairtrading.nsw.gov.au/biz_res/ftweb/pdfs/About_us/Have_your_say/Strata_title_law_reform_position_paper.pdf).
· Further research out of Griffith University by Christopher Guilding (published September 2015) has made similar findings as has a joint study convened by Engineers Australia (Accredited Certifiers Viewpoint of Certification in NSW and Mitigation of Defects in Construction, July 2015).
Ordinary Meeting of Council - 9 February 2016 |
GB.6 / 240 |
|
|
Item GB.6 |
S02294 |
|
13 January 2016 |
Extension - Waste Collection Contract
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
purpose of report: |
To seek Council’s endorsement for an extension to the existing waste collection contract. |
|
|
background: |
Council’s waste management collection contract will expire in September 2016. Services associated with this contract include all domestic waste, recycling, green waste and clean-up services as well as trade waste and recycling for commercial premises. |
|
|
comments: |
Section 55 (3) (1) Local Government Act permits Council to engage services without tendering where extenuating circumstances exist.
Legal advice has been sought to advise Council on whether it can resolve a short term extension to this Contract without formal Tender due to extenuating circumstances.
Council’s collection contractor Veolia has indicated their agreement to a 12 month’s extension subject to a modest contribution from Council for the additional vehicle maintenance costs due to the extension of the Contract. This contribution will not exceed the forecast budget for 2017. |
|
|
recommendation: |
That Council offer Veolia Environmental Services an extension to the waste and recycling collection Contract to September 2017. |
Purpose of Report
To seek Council’s endorsement for an extension to the existing waste collection contract.
Background
Council’s waste management collection contract will expire in September 2016. Services associated with this contract include all domestic waste, recycling, green waste and clean-up services as well as trade waste and recycling for commercial premises.
Contracts of this nature typically have terms of 10 years due to the significant costs and investment in purpose built collection vehicles and bins that are amortised over a long enough time frame. This allows the service to be offered at an affordable cost to the community. A service contract of less than seven (7) years is not recommended due the high costs for collection vehicles.
As this Council is currently being considered as a merged Council under the State Government reform, it is considered prudent to allow the existing waste management services contract to continue until there is more certainty on Council’s future.
Comments
Section 55 (3) (1) Local Government Act permits a Council to engage services without tendering where extenuating circumstances exist.
Legal advice has been sought to advise Council on whether it can resolve a short term extension to this Contract without formal Tender due to extenuating circumstances.
The legal advice indicates the State Government’s Guidelines under Section 23A and review of Ku-ring-gai Council as part of its Fit for Future reforms could reasonably be viewed as extenuating circumstances for not tendering and entering into a long term service contract. A twelve (12) month extension is proposed until the merger proposal has been completed and allows Council to provide these essential services without undue impact to the community.
Council’s collection contractor Veolia has indicated their agreement to a 12 month’s extension subject to a reasonable variation for the additional vehicle maintenance costs due to the extension of the Contract. This contribution will not exceed the forecast budget for 2017 and will not impact on the Domestic Waste Charge. The advice from Veolia about the cost of the extension to the existing contract is included in the confidential attachments.
integrated planning and reporting
Natural Environment
Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective |
Delivery Program Term Achievement |
Operational Plan Task |
The community is responsible and engaged in improving recycling and reduction in resources
|
Percentage household waste diverted from landfill
|
Recycling services are provided and waste, recycling and avoidance education is enhanced
|
FIT FOR THE FUTURE IMPROVEMENT ACTION PLAN
The NSW Government's Fit for the Future initiative required all councils to prepare an Improvement Proposal and supporting Implementation Plan demonstrating how all seven Fit for the Future benchmarks would be met by 2016/17, and maintained or improved thereafter.
Council's Fit For the Future Improvement Proposal and supporting Implementation Plan underpins the decision to stand alone and not merge with Hornsby Council. The objectives established in the Improvement Proposal and Implementation Plan are embedded in Council's adopted Integrated Planning and Reporting documents including the Revised Delivery Program 2013-2017 and Operational Plan 2015-2016, Long Term Financial Plan 2015/16 to 2024/25 and Asset Management Strategy 2015/16 to 2024/25.
The delivery of waste and recycling services is an essential service provided by local government and any extension to the current contract will not impact on the Long Term Financial Plan or Operating Plan.
Governance Matters
The Office of Local Government has issued Guidelines to Councils on council’s decision making during merger proposal periods.
Key points issued as part of these Guidelines are;
· “Councils should not enter into new contracts for an amount of $578,000 or more (in Ku-ring-gai’s case) unless it is to implement an action previously approved in the Delivery Program or Operational Plan or is reasonable necessary to meet ongoing service commitments, or is a result of a decision made or procurement process commenced prior to the merger proposal period”
Further the Guidelines instruct Councils to not make the following;
· “make significant and/or ongoing financial commitments that will be binding on a new council
· making other significant undertakings or commitments that will be binding on a new council
· making decisions that are designed to limit the flexibility or discretion of a new Council”
Confidential attachments to this report include the costing proposal, agreement letter from Veolia and the proposed minor changes to the Contract.
The attachments are considered to be confidential in accordance with Section 10A (2)(d)(ii) of The Local Government Act 1993 as they are considered to contain commercial in confidence information.
Risk Management
There is no significant risk to Council in extending this service Contract.
However, the merger proposal has placed Council in a difficult situation with regard to the waste collection contract due to the termination date of the contract being September 2016.
Financial Considerations
Council’s domestic waste and recycling services are budgeted in accordance with the Local Government Act involving a stand-alone cost centre that expends funds received from income derived from the community for the reasonable costs of providing the service. The delivery of these services does not impact on the Council’s General Financial Plan.
The contractor has sought a minor variation to the Contract including a contribution for the additional vehicle maintenance costs for extending the Contract a further 12 months.
This contribution will not result in an increase in the Domestic Waste charge for 2016/2017.
Social Considerations
Waste and recycling services are an essential service provided by local government that contribute to social stability, amenity and public health.
Environmental Considerations
Waste and recycling services contribute to environmental improvement associated with resource recovery and environment health.
Community Consultation
Community consultation relating to this decision is not required as services associated with this contract will remain unchanged.
Internal Consultation
Council’s Corporate Section has been consulted on the financial implications of the proposed extension.
Summary
Council’s waste management collection contract is due to expire in September 2016. Services associated with this contract include domestic waste, recycling, green waste and clean-up services as well as trade waste and recycling for commercial premises.
Service contracts of this type typically have terms of seven (7) to ten (10) years to allow the amortisation of the capital invested in these services to be affordable to the community.
Legal advice has been sought in relation to the State Government’s Guidelines under Section 23A of the Local Government Act as part of its Fit for Future reforms. The advice is that the Government’s reforms process could reasonably be viewed as extenuating circumstances for not tendering for a short term extension to Council’s current collection Contract. State Government has issued Guidelines that do not permit Council entering into long term contract commitments.
A 12 months extension will allow the detailed circumstances associated with the Fit for Future review to become apparent. It would allow Council to continue to provide services without making significant undertakings or commitment that will be binding on a new council.
A. That Council offer Veolia Environmental Services an extension to the waste and recycling collection Contract to September 2017.
B. That Council note the extenuating circumstances for not tendering this service for the period of extension is due to the State Government’s Fit for Future reforms and associated Guidelines under Section 23A Local Government Act.
C. The General Manager be authorised to finalise negotiations with Veolia and execute the extension to the Deed of Contract
|
Colin Wright Manager Waste |
Greg Piconi Director Operations |
Costing proposal |
|
Confidential |
||
|
Agreement letter |
|
Confidential |
|
|
Proposed minor changed to Contract |
|
Confidential |
Ordinary Meeting of Council - 9 February 2016 |
GB.7 / 245 |
|
|
Item GB.7 |
S10604 |
|
13 January 2016 |
Report following the exhibition of the
Draft Ku-ring-gai S94A Contributions Plan 2015
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
purpose of report: |
The purpose of this report is to report back to Council following the exhibition of the draft S94A Contributions Plan 2015. |
|
|
background: |
A s94A contributions plan are levies based on a percentage of the cost of development. This plan is intended to be complementary to the main s94 contributions plan and to apply only to small scale development and non-residential development outside the local centres contributions catchments. |
|
|
comments: |
The draft s94A contributions plan was exhibited in September-October 2015 and has pended the preparation of procedures and the development of software support prior to being formally brought into effect. |
|
|
recommendation: |
That the draft S94A Contributions Plan 2015 be adopted as Ku-ring-gai S94A Contributions Plan 2015. That the adoption and date of coming into effect be advertised in accordance with the legislation. |
Purpose of Report
The purpose of this report is to report back to Council following the exhibition of the draft S94A Contributions Plan 2015.
Background
There are two types of contributions plans permitted under Division 6 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (as amended). They are called ‘direct’ and ‘indirect’ plans which relates to the methodology of quantifying the contributions due.
Direct contributions plans, which follow the established methodology in effect since their inception, quantify contributions based on a direct and causal increase in demand for essential facilities and infrastructure to be wholly or partly funded by the Contributions Plan. The current Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010, is a direct plan. It is a standard s94 contributions plan. Formal contributions plans, as distinct from policies, have been required since June 1993. Section 94 contributions have existed since the inception of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 building on more limited provision in the (then) Local Government Act 1919. Section 94A, known as indirect contributions, based on a percentage of the cost of development, were introduced into the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 in the 2005 amendments.
Indirect contributions plans allow the calculation and levying of a contribution that relates to a set percentage of the Capital Investment Value (CIV) of the proposed development. While there is a generalised indirect nexus outlined in this type of contributions plan, it does not need to relate specifically and directly to a literal increase in people or traffic.
Many other councils in NSW have a s94A contributions plan both as the only contributions plan active in the area or as complementary to a direct s94 contributions plan. For example, Willoughby has two s94A contributions plans, one for the CBD and one for the remainder of the LGA while Hornsby operates both a s94A Plan and a s94 Plan. The choice in the suite of contributions documents relates to the nature and type of potential development being undertaken either generally, or in specific locations.
For indirect contributions plans, the maximum percentage that can be levied is set at 1% and less for smaller scale developments. This means that this type of plan will never yield a substantive amount of income for the provision of infrastructure and could never replace a direct contributions plan in an area such as Ku-ring-gai which is experiencing intensive redevelopment on high-cost land with a commensurate high demand for costly supporting infrastructure.
It can however supplement the main contributions plan, supporting additional works that are less suitable for inclusion in a direct contributions plan and would otherwise be unfunded or underfunded such as Neighbourhood Centre Revitalisation programmes, targeted intersection treatments, street upgrades for the improvement of on-street car parking, and works to existing parks that are not listed in the current Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010, to cater for changing or intensifying use.
Comments
Following the exhibition of the Draft Ku-ring-gai S94A Contributions Plan 2015, and the installation of the IT system which will enable the contributions to be calculated, levied and receipted as well the undertaking of drafting documented procedures, the contributions plan can now be returned to Council for adoption.
The Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000, outlines the responsibilities of Council in adopting a draft contributions plan:
Approval of contributions plan by council
1. After considering many submissions about the draft contributions plan that have been duly made, the council:
(a) may approve the plan in the form in which it was publicly exhibited, or
(b) may approve the plan with such alterations as the council thinks fit, or
(c) may decide not to proceed with the plan.
2. The council must give public notice of its decision in a local newspaper within 28 days after the decision is made.
3. Notice of a decision not to proceed with a contributions plan must include the council’s reasons for the decision.
4. A contributions plan comes into effect on the date that public notice of its approval is given in a local newspaper, or on a later date specified in the notice.
Following both community and internal consultation, a few minor changes have been made that do not alter the nature or intent of the s94A Contributions Plan but add clarity to existing clauses.
The main addition is the provision in Appendix One including a list of development types by geographic area for both contributions plans, in order to lend greater clarity to the existing written description in exhibition draft of the s94A contributions plan of the development to which it will apply. It is important to reiterate that the adoption of this indirect s94A contribution plan will have no effect on the main s94 contributions plan being Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 which will continue to apply to all the development to which it currently applies. The s94A contributions plan is entirely exclusive to it, applying to different development and funding a different works programme. As such, the Appendix now includes more detailed reference to development subject to Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010.
It was initially considered that the s94A contributions plan should be 2016 rather than 2015, however, this process commenced and the public exhibition process completed in 2015 prior to the proclamation of the process of Council amalgamations. Given the timing of this process, and the likelihood of some certainty one way or the other being realised during 2016, it is considered appropriate that this document should retain a 2015 title as exhibited.
integrated planning and reporting
Theme: Community, People and Culture
Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective |
Delivery Program Term Achievement |
Operational Plan Task |
C4.1 A community that embraces healthier lifestyle choices and practices |
New and enhanced open space and recreation facilities have been delivered to increase community use and enjoyment |
C4.1.2.1.1; C4.1.2.1.2; and C4.1.2.1.3 Scope for works to existing parks not covered by Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010
|
Theme: Places, Spaces and Infrastructure
Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective |
Delivery Program Term Achievement |
Operational Plan Task |
P1.1 Ku-ring-gai’s unique and visual character and identity is maintained |
Place making programmes are being implemented for selected council owned areas |
P1.1.1.1.2 Scope for neighbourhood centre improvement |
P2.1 A robust planning framework is in place to deliver quality design outcomes and maintain the identity and character of Ku-ring-gai |
Strategies, plans and processes are in place to effectively manage the impact of new development |
P8.1.1.1.1.1-2 Ku-ring-gai is targeted all development that generates new demand for a fair proportion of the cost of meeting that demand.
|
Theme: Access, Traffic and Transport
Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective |
Delivery Program Term Achievement |
Operational Plan Task |
T1.1 A range of integrated transport choices are available to enable effective movement to, from and around Ku-ring-gai |
A network of safe and convenient links to local centres, major land uses and recreational opportunities is in place |
C6.1.2.1.1; T1.1.3.1.1 Increased scope to deliver works outside the local centres that enhance accessibility |
Theme: Leadership and Governance
Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective |
Delivery Program Term Achievement |
Operational Plan Task |
L2.1 Council rigorously manages its financial resources and assets to maximise delivery of services |
Council expenditure satisfies the needs of the community and Council has increased its commitment to infrastructure asset management priorities |
C6.1.1.1.2 Ku-ring-gai utilises all available scope to deliver improved infrastructure in Ku-ring-gai. |
FIT FOR THE FUTURE IMPROVEMENT ACTION PLAN
The NSW Government's Fit for the Future initiative required all councils to prepare an Improvement Proposal and supporting Implementation Plan demonstrating how all seven Fit for the Future benchmarks would be met by 2016/17, and maintained or improved thereafter.
Council's Fit For the Future Improvement Proposal and supporting Implementation Plan underpins the decision to stand alone and not merge with Hornsby Council. The objectives established in the Improvement Proposal and Implementation Plan are embedded in Council's adopted Integrated Planning and Reporting documents including the Revised Delivery Program 2013-2017 and Operational Plan 2015-2016, Long Term Financial Plan 2015/16 to 2024/25 and Asset Management Strategy 2015/16 to 2024/25.
The adoption and implementation of a s94A indirect contributions plan enhances Council’s financial position facilitating delivery of additional local infrastructure such as neighbourhood centre improvements and improvements to existing parks to cater for population growth and change.
It is not considered that the adoption of an exhibited indirect s94A contributions plan is inconsistent with the Council Decision Making During the Merger Proposals Period Guidelines issued in December 2015.
Governance Matters
The draft indirect s94A contributions plan has been prepared with regard to:
· guidelines published by the Department of Planning;
· current relevant s94E Directions by the Minister;
· the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act and Regulation thereunder; as well as
· reference to best practice examples from other Local Government entities.
It was placed on public exhibition in September-October 2015. Internal consultations also took place during this time. A few minor amendments have been made as a result of this consultation to improve the clarity of the document.
Risk Management
The main risk is to ensure that the operation of the current and additional contributions plan is demonstrated to be mutually exclusive, relating to different types of proposed developments and/or different locations. For this reason, the clarity of which development is subject to which contributions plan, has been improved. Whilst this information was already in the exhibited document, it was more difficult to interpret. The s94A contributions plan also features an entirely separate works programme to the main s94 contributions plan to eliminate the potential for double-dipping.
A smaller risk is the potential issue of a s94E Direction affecting the s94A contributions plan after its adoption. The Contributions Plan does include references to s94E Directions at 1.8 How are indirect s94A Contributions derived?
Financial Considerations
The financial management arrangements for the current Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 will remain unchanged as they are not affected or altered by the prospective introduction of this new contributions plan. However, parallel record keeping systems will need to be implemented in the event this draft contributions plan is adopted to ensure that records are kept of the source and quantum, of each contribution and that the proposed expenditure is incorporated into the Long Term Financial Plan. Additional capacity will need to be incorporated for a s94A Register as for the current s94 Register. However as this is only one category, this is of a much smaller scale than would be the case for a direct s94 contributions plan. The cost of administering the s94A contribution plan, as for the s94 plan, will be covered by a management component of the funds collected.
The benefits of introducing a s94A contributions plan, however, include the receipt of additional, small scale, contributions to projects which are important and valuable but cannot be incorporated in the main contributions plan for a variety of reasons, including the retention of a reasonable contribution rate and the excessive co-contribution that would be required for any new items that were belatedly added to the existing direct contributions plan is in its eleventh year of operation, and the like.
Preliminary investigations into the possible income from such a contributions plan, looking at development over $100,000 over the preceding two and a half years, indicated that an average annual receipt could be in the order of $750,000 to $1 million. It is important to note however, that the propensity to undertake knock down/rebuilds or significant alterations and additions is influenced by external economic factors relating to our residents. Additionally, single, larger one-off developments, such as a supermarket located in or near a neighbourhood centre, may increase the income in one given year which may not be repeated in any other year. It will initially be difficult to predict income with any degree of accuracy. As such, apart from adopted programmes, allocation of income to works should be undertaken as part of the Long Term Financial Planning annual updates.
Social Considerations
The s94A contributions plan offers a capacity for development that may still give rise to demands for infrastructure but do not currently contribute under the main contributions plan to provide for infrastructure that is also needed but not included within Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010. Ku-ring-gai will continue to works towards a better quality environment and public domain for living and working as a result, hence supporting further business investment and quality development.
Environmental Considerations
The works proposed by the s94A contributions plan will also need to meet all essential environmental criteria prior to implementation and delivery.
Community Consultation
Draft Ku-ring-gai S94A Contributions Plan 2015 was exhibited for public comment from Friday 25 September to Friday 30 October 2015. This exceeds the minimum 28 days and was extended in view of the Labour Day Public Holiday and school holidays. No external submissions were received by Council during the exhibition period or afterwards.
Internal Consultation
Staff who are involved in the aspects of key works programme items which are currently unfunded by Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 were consulted closely to inform the additional works programme with reference also being made to Council’s Long Term Financial Plan. A meeting with the Finance section was held and some questions they raised were addressed prior to exhibition. The finalisation of documented procedures is underway and will need to be agreed internally before the plan can formally commence.
Copies of the draft s94A contributions plan were also provided to staff within the Development and Regulation section for comment and to Council’s Corporate Lawyer. While the exhibited draft Contributions Plan does contain a written description of the development covered by this draft indirect s94A contributions plan by type and location, a list has been drafted for inclusion for the alleviation of any confusion between the application of this contributions plan and the complementary but mutually exclusive main s94 direct contributions plan: Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010.
Further implementation procedures are being finalised and an in effect date will be nominated to ensure that procedures can be in place prior to the contributions plan going live.
Summary
A draft s94A ‘indirect’ contributions plan has been prepared to operate in parallel with, and mutually exclusive to, the current s94 ‘direct’ Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010. It is recommended that the indirect contributions plan be adopted as Ku-ring-gai Section 94A Contributions Plan 2015 and that the adoption be duly advertised in the North Shore Times as required by the legislation nominating an in effect date to time with the completion of procedures. The Regulations require Council’s decision to be notified within 28 days of the decision being made which would mean advertisement in the North Shore Times of Friday 4 March 2016 at the latest. It is anticipated that the indirect s94A contributions plan will be in effect by Easter which falls towards the end of March.
The advertisement will nominate an ‘in effect’ date that enables the finalisation of the procedures as well as notification to the Building Professionals Board that the implementation is imminent, in order to facilitate a streamlined introduction. Council is permitted to nominate a date of effect later than the publication date by clause 31(4) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000. In this context, Easter provides a suitable effective date because of the unlikelihood of any lodgements or determinations being made at that time which would give rise to arguments as to whether the plan was in effect at the time of lodgement or determination as would be the case for an ordinary working day. This is particularly important in view of the number of CDCs that will be subject to this contributions plan.
While amended s94 contributions plan generally apply to all undetermined developments on ‘go-live’ this is a new s94A contributions plan and will apply to new development that has not previously been levied. Accordingly, it is more reasonable to apply the plan to all relevant DAs and CDCs lodged with the Council (including private CDCs notified to the Council) after the date of bringing into effect. This will ensure that the correct development cost analysis documents can be prepared and submitted concurrent with the new applications that will enable the correct contribution to be determined in a timely manner. As this document certifying the cost of the development is required to be lodged with the application, it is unreasonable to retrospectively apply this levy to applications already lodged with Council or formally notified to Council by Private Certifiers.
Finally is it reiterated and emphasised that the adoption of this indirect S94A contributions plan has no effect on the main s94 contributions plan being Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 to which it is mutually exclusive. Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 will continue to apply to all the development to which it currently applies both inside and outside the local centres of Ku-ring-gai.
A. That the exhibited Draft Ku-ring-gai S94A Contributions Plan 2015 be adopted as Ku-ring-gai S94A Contributions Plan 2015 with the minor amendments described in this report.
B. That all requisite procedures be carried out in order to bring the S94A contributions plan into effect.
C. That the adoption be advertised in accordance with the Regulations nominating the effective date from which the s94A contributions plan will operate.
D. That delegated authority be granted to the General Manager to effect any typographical corrections and clarifications that may be required in accordance with the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 and the Guidelines issued by the Department of Planning as may be necessary for effective completion. |
Kate Paterson Infrastructure Co-ordinator |
Antony Fabbro Manager Urban & Heritage Planning |
Andrew Watson Director Strategy & Environment |
|
Draft Ku-ring-gai S94A Contributions Plan 2015 |
|
2016/024699 |
Ordinary Meeting of Council - 9 February 2016 |
GB.8 / 297 |
|
|
Item GB.8 |
88/05859/01 |
|
19 January 2016 |
Road Closure Application - Newhaven Place St Ives
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
purpose of report: |
For Council to consider the formal public road closure of a constructed pathway between Newhaven Place and Links Road St Ives. |
|
|
background: |
In December 2015, a formal road closure application was submitted for consideration. The application includes support from the owners of 10 and 12 Newhaven Place St Ives. |
|
|
comments: |
The pathway is legally categorised as road reserve under Council ownership and as is subject to the requirements of the Roads Act 1993. |
|
|
recommendation: |
That Council commence a formal road closure application for the constructed pathway between 10 and 12 Newhaven Place St Ives to be submitted to the Department of Primary Industries – Lands. |
Purpose of Report
For Council to consider the formal public road closure of a constructed pathway between Newhaven Place and Links Road St Ives.
Background
On 17 July 2014, a Pre-DA meeting (PRE0077/14) was held to discuss a residential flat proposal at 10-12 Newhaven Place St Ives, involving the demolition of two dwellings, the consolidation of two Torrens title lots and the acquisition of a 3.66 metre wide Council-owned pathway to enable the construction of a 5 storey residential flat building and two levels of underground basement parking.
Council staff noted at the time, that prior to the lodgement of any Development Application (DA) the status of the pathway separating 10-12 Newhaven Place St Ives needed to be resolved.
During the latter part of 2015 further enquiries were made with Council staff on the procedures to acquire a pathway sited between 10 and 12 Newhaven Place St Ives.
In December 2015, a formal road closure application was submitted for consideration. The application includes support from the owners of 10 and 12 Newhaven Place St Ives.
The Applicant (a property developer) has entered into commercial agreements with the owners of 10 and 12 Newhaven Place to redevelop these properties in accordance with adopted planning controls for a residential flat development.
The Applicant wishes to integrate the pathway into the future development or relocate to another location within the site to ensure that pedestrian access to Links Road is retained (Attachment A1).
Comments
The pathway was dedicated to the public as part of a Torrens title subdivision in 1965 (see attached) and provides a pedestrian link between Newhaven Place and Link Road St Ives (Attachment A2- location map).
The pathway is legally categorised as road reserve under Council ownership and is subject to the requirements of the Roads Act 1993. The only avenue for Council to consider the potential future sale of the pathway is to submit a formal road closure application with the Department of Primary Industries – Lands (Lands).
Effective June 2014, Lands put in place new arrangements for the closure of roads that vest with councils.
The new arrangements streamline previously duplicated processes and enables Council to manage the road closure process and to complete a series of actions prior to lodgement of an application with Lands. There are two stages to the process which includes:
· carry out a full status check of the road to confirm dedication as a council public road and its public use and construction, required to verify its status as vesting in Council on closing;
· advertise an intention to close the council public road in a local paper circulating in the same area as the intended closing;
· send notification of the proposal to all affected parties and authorities noting the 28 day submission period;
· Council then considers all submissions received and take action to resolve any objections;
· once all submissions/objections have been resolved or Council forms the opinion that no further progress can be made, Council prepare a report with a summary and assessment of the submissions/objections, with a recommendation and options.
Once the above pre-lodgement actions are completed, Council then lodges a road closing application and a status report of the proposed road closing along with supporting documentation to Lands.
It is important to note that the commencement of the road closure application does not in any way bind Council to the sale of the pathway. It merely initiates a statutory process and it is only once Council holds Title over the land that final negotiations would be undertaken for any potential land sale, which would require a further resolution of Council.
Further discussions and negotiations are required between Council and the property developers prior to any potential land sale. However, there is nothing deterring Council from commencing the formal road closure as this is a lengthy statutory process.
integrated planning and reporting
Leadership & Governance
Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective |
Delivery Program Term Achievement |
Operational Plan Task |
Council rigorously manages its financial resources and assets to maximise delivery of services. |
Council maintains and improves its long term financial position
|
Continue to analyse opportunities to expand the revenue of Council.
|
|
|
Ensure the commercial property portfolio provides market returns. |
Governance Matters
Part 4, Division 1, of the Roads Act, 1993, requires that Council consent to the closure of a road.
Following resolution to commence a road closure under the new arrangements Council staff will carry out all pre-lodgement requirements prescribed by Lands.
Additionally, the road closure application submitted to the Lands requires that Council nominate whether the land be classified as Operational or Community as defined under the Local Government Act, 1993.
In order for Council to consider the potential divestment of the pathway it is recommended that Council resolve for the road to be classified as Operational land. Classification of the land as Operational will provide Council with the flexibility to on-sell the pathway in the future.
On publication of the notice closing the public road, a public road that was previously vested in a council (other than a public road in respect of which no construction has ever taken place), remains vested in the council.
The final decision to sell public land requires a formal resolution of Council in order to proceed. Any future sale would be carried out in accordance with Council’s Acquisition and Divestment of Land Policy
Risk Management
Potential risk is associated with objections to close the pathway and the unknown timeframe for the statutory road closure process to be completed.
This is to be considered given that a development application for the adjoining land is currently being assessed by Council.
Financial Considerations
Lands currently charges $476.60 to process and finalise a Road Closure application.
A formal survey of the pathway will be required for submission with the application to Lands. This is estimated to cost $3,000.
Any future discussions and/or negotiations with the adjoining property owners relating to a land transfer will be submitted in a separate report to Council.
Under the Roads Act, 1993, all income obtained by Council from the sale of closed roads must be used for acquiring land for public roads or for carrying out road work on public roads.
Social Considerations
This proposal will assist in the delivery of Council's Community Strategic Plan 2030 in providing new funding towards community road projects.
All adjoining owners and the broader community will have an opportunity to provide submissions on the road closure proposal as part of the public notification process.
Environmental Considerations
The road closure proposal is a statutory process and does alter the current use of the site.
Any environmental issues would be assessed in the event the site is included for future redevelopment.
Community Consultation
The Roads Act, 1993 requires public notification to all affected/adjoining property owners, service and utility providers.
It is only with the concurrence of other State Government instrumentalities that a road closure application will proceed.
Internal Consultation
Staff from within the Strategy and Environment Department and Operations have been consulted for the development of this report.
Summary
A road closure application was received following a Pre-DA discussion with Council staff, and after further consultation with the local ward Councillors on the potential closure and relocation of the pathway, it is proposed to commence formal road closure procedures to obtain title to the constructed pathway between 10 and 12 Newhaven Place St Ives. The path currently provides a pedestrian link between Newhaven Place and Link Road.
The Applicant is seeking to integrate the pathway into the future development 10 and 12 Newhaven Place and relocate it to another location within the site to ensure that pedestrian access to Links Road is retained.
Council can ensure that pedestrian access is retained in the current location or on an alternative location with the creation of a Right of Way. However, these particulars have not been established and would be included in a future report to Council.
A requirement of the road closure application is for Council to nominate the classification of the closed road as Operational or Community as defined under the Local Government Act, 1993. In order for Council to consider the potential divestment of the pathway it is recommended that Council resolve for the road to be classified as Operational land.
The Roads Act, 1993, requires that all income obtained by Council from the sale of closed roads must be used for acquiring land for public roads or for carrying out road work on public roads. Therefore any income derived from the sale of closed roads will contribute to acquisition and construction costs of road infrastructure.
Importantly, the commencement of the road closure application does not in any way bind Council to the sale of the pathway. It merely initiates a lengthy and detailed statutory process.
It is only once Council holds Title over the land that negotiations would be undertaken for any potential land sale, which would initiate a further report to Council.
The final decision to sell public land requires a further formal resolution of Council in order to proceed
A. That Council commences a formal road closure application for the constructed pathway between 10 and 12 Newhaven Place St Ives, to be submitted to the Department of Primary Industries – Lands.
B. That upon closure and issuance of the Certificate of Title for the unnamed pathway between 10 -12 Newhaven Place St Ives the land be classified as Operational Land.
C. That following closure of the pathway a further report to be submitted to Council detailing the potential divestment of the land.
|
Deborah Silva Manager Integrated Planning, Property & Assets |
Andrew Watson Director Strategy & Environment |
Potential Landscape Path - Newhaven Place St Ives |
|
2016/023448 |
||
|
Newhaven Place Pathway - Location Sketch |
|
2016/024158 |
Ordinary Meeting of Council - 9 February 2016 |
GB.9 / 307 |
|
|
Item GB.9 |
S10376 |
|
20 January 2016 |
Gordon Civic and Cultural Hub - update in response to NSW Government merger proposal
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
purpose of report: |
The purpose of this report is to advise Council of the impacts of the NSW Government Merger Proposal on the Gordon Cultural and Civic Hub Master Plan project. |
|
|
background: |
At the Ordinary Meeting of Council on 15 December 2015 Council resolved (in part) to defer progression of the project until a tour of a range of cultural and civic facilities around Sydney is organised for Councillors. |
|
|
comments: |
In January 2016 the NSW Government released a Merger Proposal for Hornsby Shire Council (part) and Ku-ring-gai Council. The foreword to the Proposal by Minister Paul Toole explicitly notes the importance of the revitalisation projects Council is currently undertaking in Lindfield, Turramurra and Gordon Town Centres. Despite the Minister’s desire to continue these projects the Merger Proposal creates significant uncertainty for the Gordon Cultural and Civic Hub Master Plan project. |
|
|
recommendation: |
This report recommends that the Gordon Cultural and Civic Hub Master Plan Project be deferred for the foreseeable future until broader strategic matters arising from the NSW Government Merger Proposal for Hornsby Shire Council (part) and Ku-ring-gai Council have been resolved; and that the community be notified of Council’s decision. |
Purpose of Report
The purpose of this report is to advise Council of the impacts of the NSW Government Merger Proposal on the Gordon Cultural and Civic Hub Master Plan project.
Background
At the Ordinary Meeting of Council on 15 December 2015 GB.10 Gordon Cultural and Civic Hub - Update Report - Post Site Visit and Briefing updated Council on the progress of planning for the site and present the findings of Phase 1 – Project Definition & Feasibility and sought Council’s approval to proceed to Phase 2 - Business Case and Master Plan for the Gordon Cultural and Civic Hub site, at 818 Pacific Highway, Gordon. At that meeting Council resolved (in part):
A. That the matter be deferred until a tour of a range of cultural and civic facilities around Sydney is organised for Councillors.
Comments
In January 2016 the NSW Government released a Merger Proposal for Hornsby Shire Council (part) and Ku-ring-gai Council. The foreword to the Proposal by Minister Paul Toole explicitly notes the importance of the revitalisation projects Council is currently undertaking in Lindfield, Turramurra and Gordon Town Centres.
Further at page 10 the Merger Proposal cites “the revitalisation of Lindfield, Turramurra and Gordon town centres to transform them into cultural and civic hubs together with the opportunity to incorporate activities for teenagers, senior citizens and more commuter car parking in any redevelopments” as “[e]xamples of local infrastructure priorities that could be funded by merger generated savings”. Also at page 10, the Merger Proposal states the proposed merger may “also allow for more efficient use of council office buildings, preventing the need for expensive upgrades to the Ku-ring-gai Council building”.
Ironically, and clearly not understood by the authors of the Merger Proposal, all Council’s hub projects were being designed to be self-funding, without the need to rely on “merger savings” or other recurrent income sources. Similarly, the equally inadequate condition of Hornsby Shire Council’s civic accommodation is also ignored.
Despite the Minister’s desire to continue these projects, specific reference to council office accommodation in the Merger Proposal creates significant uncertainty for the Gordon Cultural and Civic Hub Master Plan project.
As reported to Council on 15 December 2015 the Gordon Cultural and Civic Hub master plan project was predicated on three key assumptions:
· That the existing administrative offices are no longer fit for purpose and require extensive refurbishment;
· That 828 Pacific Highway will not be available for the relocation of staff as a result of Council’s ‘Fit for the Future Improvement Proposal’ submission; and
· new or refurbished Council administrative offices will need to be considered as part of the Hub project for which there is no allocated funding source.
Three possible options were considered as part of the preliminary feasibility analysis of the Hub:
· Base Case – maintain existing building with minor refurbishment;
· Refit of Existing Building - strip out the existing building to a bare shell, new internal fit out and modern efficient plant; or
· Construct a new office building on the site of the existing building.
If the Merger Proposal is implemented there will need to be considerable thought given to the long term staffing requirements of the new Council and where staff are best located to service the new LGA. Whether the future location is determined to be in Gordon or elsewhere the project scope and feasibility of the Gordon Cultural and Civic Hub Master Plan project will change significantly.
It is therefore recommended that the Project be deferred for the foreseeable future until the broader strategic matters noted above have been resolved.
integrated planning and reporting
The Gordon Cultural and Civic Hub is intended to support the Council’s Vision and Community Strategic Plan 2030 which identifies a number of key themes to direct future development and interaction with the community. The development of a Cultural & Civic Hub will directly impact and support the following themes from the Strategic Plan 2030.
Theme 1 – Community, People and Culture
Theme 3 - Places, Spaces and Infrastructure
Theme 5 – Local Economy and Employment
Theme 6 – Leadership & Governance
Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective |
Delivery Program Term Achievement |
Operational Plan Task |
Theme 1 - A healthy, safe and diverse community that respects our history and celebrates our differences in a vibrant culture of learning.
|
C2.1.1 Ku-ring-gai’s rich cultural diversity and creativity is celebrated through programs and events.
|
- Promote and support a range of cultural and nationally significant events through Council; - Promote opportunities for cultural groups to stage events consistent with Council's Sponsorship policy; |
|
C4.1.2 New and enhanced open space and recreational facilities have been delivered to increase community use and enjoyment.
|
- Undertake strategic land acquisitions; - Implement and monitor the Ku-ring-gai Open Space Acquisition Strategy; - Complete the design for identified parks and include design principles which facilitate passive recreation activities. |
Theme 3 - A range of well planned, clean and safe neighbourhoods and public spaces designed with a strong sense of identity and place. |
P1.1.1 Opportunities are provided to our community to contribute to plans for enhancing the local area and visual amenity of our centres. |
- Develop concept plans for the neighbourhood centres informed by Community engagement. |
|
P4.1.3 An improvement plan for Gordon Centre is being progressively implemented in collaboration with owners, businesses and state agencies. |
- Engage with stakeholders and undertake a needs analysis and scoping study for a civic/cultural hub in Gordon; and - Commence preparation of a master plan for the civic/cultural hub in Gordon including a feasibility study. |
|
P5.1.2 Conservation Management Plans are in place and being implemented for the cultural and heritage assets of the area to ensure their long term viability. |
- Identify resources for the development and implementation of heritage conservation management plans. |
Theme 5 - Creating economic employment opportunities through vital, attractive centres, business innovation and technology. |
E1.1.1 Ku-ring-gai’s opportunities and assets are promoted to strengthen and attract business and employment to the area. |
- Continue to identify opportunities to promote and strengthen Ku-ring-gai’s economy. |
Theme 6 - Ku-ring-gai is well led, managed and supported by ethical organisations which deliver projects and services to the community by listening, advocating and responding to their needs. |
L2.1.4 Council has increased its commitment to infrastructure asset management priorities. |
- Identify available funding sources in the Long Term Financial Plan and allocate to priority projects and assets. |
FIT FOR THE FUTURE IMPROVEMENT ACTION PLAN
The NSW Government's Fit for the Future initiative required all councils to prepare an Improvement Proposal and supporting Implementation Plan demonstrating how all seven Fit for the Future benchmarks would be met by 2016/17, and maintained or improved thereafter.
Council's Fit For the Future Improvement Proposal and supporting Implementation Plan underpins the decision to stand alone and not merge with Hornsby Council. The objectives established in the Improvement Proposal and Implementation Plan are embedded in Council's adopted Integrated Planning and Reporting documents including the Revised Delivery Program 2013-2017 and Operational Plan 2015-2016, Long Term Financial Plan 2015/16 to 2024/25 and Asset Management Strategy 2015/16 to 2024/25.
Ku-ring-gai Council‘s Fit for the Future Improvement Proposal Submission to the State Government in June 2015 acknowledges substantial progression of the Gordon local centre revitalisation through the Gordon Civic & Community Hub Project, which will provide, community, cultural, civic and recreational facilities and spaces with potential for commercial, retail and residential development.
Council has been laying the foundations for the Gordon Hub and other notable urban renewal ‘activation’ projects for a number of years through the construction of a comprehensive and innovative development contributions plan, the acquisition of a number of sites to augment existing land holdings, the disposal (and planned future) of a number of surplus assets to provide source of funds. Council has been working co-operatively and constructively with State agencies such as RMS and Transport for NSW, and has engaged a comprehensive team of consultants including cultural needs advisors, transport planners, engineers, arborists, surveyors, valuation, property development, and feasibility specialists to develop and market test this project.
The Fit for the Future submission makes reference to Council’s infrastructure backlog – i.e. the cost to bring assets from poor and failed condition up to an acceptable standard, including the useful lives and condition ratings of assets. The Fit for the Future submission acknowledges that many Council-owned community facilities are ageing and/or no longer fit for purpose and will require significant investment to either renew or replace, thus reinforcing the established need for a new cultural and civic hub in Gordon local centre and disposal of the facilities it otherwise replaces.
The submission also acknowledges that a number of key priorities, long term aspirations and objectives for the Ku-ring-gai community, as identified in the Community Strategic Plan, 2013, are of relevance to the Gordon Hub project, including:
· bringing vitality to our centres, making it easier and safer to move around, increasing visitors to the area; and
· improving and renewing our infrastructure including community facilities, recreation and open space areas, roads, footpaths, drains and the public domain.
On the basis of the above, a key ‘improvement strategy and objective’ identified in the Fit for the Future submission, specifically relates to the Gordon Cultural and Civic Hub project - to ensure that an EOI for the redevelopment of Gordon Town Centre is sought in the 2015/2016 FY – more specifically a business case for the cultural hub component and a master plan for the Hub site.
Governance Matters
The report to Council OMC on 15 December 2015 recommended that a Planning Proposal be prepared to reclassify nos. 9, 15 & 17 Dumaresq Street, Gordon from Community land to Operational land. It is noted that Council did not resolve to progress these matters during the OMC on 15 December 2015
Risk Management
This report is addressing a key risk arising from the NSW Government Merger Proposal, namely uncertainty regarding long term staffing requirements of a new Council and uncertainty as to where staff would be located to service the new LGA.
Financial Considerations
To date Council has expended approximately $160,000.00 on this project including salaries and consultancies. These funds have been taken from development contributions 2010 Plan Recreational, Cultural & Social Facilities.
Social Considerations
Given the amount of stakeholder and community consultation undertaken for the project there is a certain level of expectation within the community in relation to the delivery of a new park and cultural facility to Gordon. It is therefore recommended that Council notify the community via Council’s website of Council’s decision in relation to this report.
Environmental Considerations
There are no environmental considerations arising from this report.
Community Consultation
There has been no community consultation in relation to the preparation of this report.
Internal Consultation
This report was prepared by the Strategy & Environment Department in consultation with staff from other Departments where relevant.
Summary
The Gordon Cultural and Civic Hub master plan project comprised three key components:
· a new civic square;
· a new cultural facility; and
· new administrative offices.
The combination of elements would provide a civic heart for Gordon and act as a catalyst for the revitalisation of Gordon Town Centre.
In January 2016 the NSW Government released a Merger Proposal for Hornsby Shire Council (part) and Ku-ring-gai Council.
The Merger Proposal has a significant impact on the Gordon Cultural and Civic Hub master plan as it is no longer possible to determine with any accuracy whether Gordon will remain a location for civic functions for a new and larger LGA.
It is therefore recommended that the Project be deferred for the foreseeable future until broader strategic matters arising from the NSW Government Merger Proposal have been resolved.
Further it is recommended that Council notify the community via Council’s website of Council’s decision in relation to this project.
A. That the Gordon Cultural and Civic Hub Master Plan Project be deferred for the foreseeable future until broader strategic matters arising from the NSW Government Merger Proposal for Hornsby Shire Council (part) and Ku-ring-gai Council have been resolved.
B. That the community be notified of Council’s decision.
|
Bill Royal Team Leader Urban Design |
Antony Fabbro Manager Urban & Heritage Planning |
Andrew Watson Director Strategy & Environment |
|
Ordinary Meeting of Council - 9 February 2016 |
NM.1 / 314 |
|
|
Item NM.1 |
S09750 |
|
29 January 2016 |
Notice of Motion
Culworth Avenue Carpark
Notice of Motion from Councillors Citer and Szatow dated 29 January 2016
At its meeting of 13 May 2014, the Council approved negotiations for part of the Culworth Avenue Carpark site to be permanently used and managed for commuter parking by Transport for NSW. Transport for NSW indicated it met operational objectives through compulsory acquisition of 3667 sqm of the site. On 27 May 2014 meeting, Council voted to accept the recommendation not to object to part of the site being compulsorily acquired by Transport for NSW for use as a commuter carpark.
However, this leaves vast uncertainty with the remaining portion of the carpark site, which is currently with the Minister for Planning for reclassification from Community land to Operational Land, which could result in a subsequent sale for high density housing or units.
In our current environment of choked roads and poor railway infrastructure, we believe the entire Culworth Avenue Carpark should be retained for future generations, to enable residents of Ku-ring-gai access to railway parking, given the large increase in population density that we will experience in Northern Sydney, over the next twenty years. We have an onus as Councillors to ensure we make logical planning decisions around our residents’ infrastructure, especially when we are encouraging Australians to use public transport, to reduce their carbon footprint.
We move that:
Council formally write to the Minister for Planning, requesting that the reclassification of Culworth Avenue Carpark in Killara, remain on hold with Government, to enable Council staff to further negotiate with Transport for NSW, for the continuing use of the site as a car park.
That the above Notice of Motion as printed be adopted.
|
Councillor David Citer Councillor for Gordon Ward |
Councillor Cheryl Szatow Mayor |