Ordinary Meeting of Council
TO BE HELD ON Tuesday, 14 March 2017 AT 7:00 pm
Level 3, Council Chambers
Agenda
** ** ** ** ** **
NOTE: For Full Details, See Council’s Website –
www.kmc.nsw.gov.au under the link to business papers
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
Address the Council
NOTE: Persons who address the Council should be aware that their address will be tape recorded.
Documents Circulated to Councillors
CONFIRMATION OF MINUTEs
Minutes of Ordinary Meeting of Council 5
File: S02131
Meeting held 28 February 2017
Minutes numbered 26 to 45
minutes from the Mayor
Petitions
PT.1 Save Turramurra Village Park 60
File: S09969
“We, the undersigned, (Four Hundred and Sixty Eight (468) Signatures].
1. Demand Turramurra Village Park remain as publicly owned open space.
2. Oppose the rezoning of the Turramurra Village Park for high-rise development.
3. Call for the full and proper protection of the heritage and environmental values of this park.
4. Denounce the undemocratic precedent of a council ignoring a Public Hearing recommendation.”
GENERAL BUSINESS
i. The Mayor to invite Councillors to nominate any item(s) on the Agenda that they wish to have a site inspection.
ii. The Mayor to invite Councillors to nominate any item(s) on the Agenda that they wish to adopt in accordance with the officer’s recommendation allowing for minor changes without debate.
GB.1 Business Engagement Update 61
File: S09436
To provide Council with an update on the business engagement program delivered in the past 12 months.
Recommendation:
That Council receive and note this report.
GB.2 2017 National General Assembly of Local Government - Call for Motions 73
File: S02133
To inform Councillors of an invitation from the Australian Local Government Association (ALGA) to submit motions to the 2017 National General Assembly (NGA) of Local Government.
Recommendation:
That Councillors provide any proposed motions for the 2017 National General Assembly of Local Government to the Manager Records & Governance by Thursday 23 March 2017, and that a further report providing details of any proposed motions be referred to Council at its meeting on 4 April 2017 for approval prior to submission to the ALGA.
GB.3 2017 Ecocity World Summit 87
File: CY00043/9
To advise Council of the 2017 ECOCITY World Summit.
Recommendation:
That any Councillors interested in attending the 2017 ECOCITY World Summit advise the General Manager by Tuesday 28 March 2017.
GB.4 Companion Animals Management Plan 2017-2020 93
File: S02613
To present to Council the draft Ku-ring-gai Companion Animals Plan for the period 2017 to 2020.
Recommendation:
That the draft Ku-ring-gai
Companion Animals Plan 2017 to 2020 be placed on public exhibition for a period
of
28 days and then be reported back to Council.
GB.5 Draft Voluntary Planning Agreement - Part Moree to Dumaresq Road Link Gordon - Exhibition 109
File: S08622/4
To provide an update on the progress towards delivering a road link between Moree Street and Dumaresq Street Gordon in accordance with the Development Control Plan and the Public Domain Plan and to present a draft Planning Agreement to Council with the recommendation that it be placed on statutory public exhibition.
Recommendation:
That the draft Planning Agreement for the partial delivery of a link-road adjoining 29-31 Moree Street Gordon be placed on statutory public exhibition.
GB.6 Proposed site for a new Rural Fire Services building at Koola Park 174
File: S02543
For Council to provide an in-principle agreement to the Rural Fire Service for the building of a fire station at Koola Park, Killara.
Recommendation:
That Council provide an in-principle support for the building of a new fire station at Koola Park with the exact location to be determined subject to further negotiations with the Crown Lands Department.
Extra Reports Circulated to Meeting
BUSINESS WITHOUT NOTICE – SUBJECT TO CLAUSE 241 OF GENERAL REGULATIONS
Questions Without Notice
Inspections Committee – SETTING OF TIME, DATE AND RENDEZVOUS
** ** ** ** ** **
Minute Ku-ring-gai Council Page
MINUTES
OF Ordinary Meeting of Council
HELD ON Tuesday, 28 February 2017
Present: |
The Mayor, Councillor J Anderson (Chairperson) Councillors E Malicki & J Pettett (Comenarra Ward) Councillors C Szatow & D Citer (Gordon Ward) Councillors C Berlioz & D Ossip (St Ives Ward) Councillor D Armstrong (Roseville Ward) Councillors C Fornari-Orsmond & D McDonald (Wahroonga Ward) |
|
|
Staff Present: |
General Manager (John McKee) Director Corporate (David Marshall) Director Development & Regulation (Michael Miocic) Director Operations (Greg Piconi) Director Strategy & Environment (Andrew Watson) Director Community (Janice Bevan) Corporate Lawyer (Jamie Taylor) Manager Records and Governance (Amber Moloney) Minutes Secretary (Christine Dunand) Team Leader Urban Design (Bill Royal) Contract Urban Designer (Louise Drum) |
The Meeting commenced at 7:00 pm
The Mayor offered the Prayer
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
The Mayor adverted to the necessity for Councillors and staff to declare a Pecuniary Interest/Conflict of Interest in any item on the Business Paper.
No Interest was declared.
26 |
CONFIRMATION OF REPORTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN CLOSED MEETING
File: S02499/9
|
|
Resolved:
(Moved: Councillors McDonald/Szatow)
A. That in accordance with the provisions of Section 10 of the Local Government Act 1993, all officers’ reports be released to the press and public, with the exception of the following Confidential reports and their respective attachments:
C.1 Lindfield Community Hub - Public Private Partnership - initial assessment of Project Proposal by the Office of Local Government In accordance with s10A(2)(d)(i),(ii),(iii)
C.2 Waste Collection Contract Extension In accordance with s10A(2)(d)(i),(ii),(iii)
B. That in accordance with the provisions of Section 10 of the Local Government Act 1993, all officers’ reports be released to the press and public, with the exception of the confidential attachment to the following General Business item:
GB.7 Turramurra Community Hub - Draft Memorandum of Understanding Attachment A1: Draft Memorandum of Understanding - Coles and KMC In accordance with s10A(2)(d)(ii)and s10A(2)(g)
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY |
Address the Council
The following member(s) of the public address Council on items not on the agenda:
C Smallbone Plastics
J Harwood Save Hillview
DOCUMENTS CIRCULATED TO COUNCILLORS
The Mayor adverted to the documents circulated in the Councillors’ papers and advised that the following matters would be dealt with at the appropriate time during the meeting:
Late Items: |
MM.2 - Greater Sydney Planning Awards - Report by Mayor dated 28 February 2017 GB.10 - PCA Smart Cities Conference 2017 - Report by Director Corporate dated 24 February 2017 and attachment. |
Memorandums: |
Refer Min 20 QWN 07/02/2017 – Update on Boundary Road and Pacific Highway Roadworks Memorandum from Director Operations dated |
Late Councillors Information: |
Refer Min 341 QN.3 6 December 2016 – Misquote from Mayor to North Shore Times of 2 December 2016 re Culworth Avenue Carpark Memorandum from Mayor dated 28 February 2016 responding to QWN from Councillor Cheryl Szatow
Refer Min 340 QN.2 6 December 2016 Min 24 QN.6 7 February 2017 - Marian Street Theatre letter from Mayor to Paul Fletcher MP Memorandum from Mayor dated 28 February 2016 responding to QWN from Councillor Cheryl Szatow
|
Late Confidential Councillor Information: |
Refer Item C1. – Lindfield Community Hub Memorandum from Director Strategy & Environment dated 27 February 2017 advising an error with attachments to confidential report. Attachment A1 incorrectly listed and Attachment A4 not included. |
Councillor Ossip withdrew during discussion
CONFIRMATION OF MINUTEs
27 |
Minutes of Ordinary Meeting of Council File: S02131 |
|
Meeting held 7 February 2017 Minutes numbered 01 to 25
|
|
Resolved:
(Moved: Councillors McDonald/Pettett)
That Minutes numbered 01 to 25 circulated to Councillors were taken as read and confirmed as an accurate record of the proceedings of the Meeting.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY |
Councillor Ossip returned
minutes from the Mayor
Councillor Citer withdrew during discussion
Councillor Citer returned
28 |
Lindfield Village Green Additional Basement Level
File: S10840 Vide: MM.1
The following members of the public addressed Council on this item:
J O’Dea, MP J Butlin L Wong B Harrison S Blamey G Stein M Sheriff C Coote I Cairns
|
|
I am tabling this Mayoral Minute to acknowledge the community concern regarding the loss of short term parking at the proposed Village Green in Lindfield.
Community consultation has played a key role in developing the design for Lindfield Village Green. Throughout the process there has been consistent support for the creation of the new green space and underground car park.
However in recent months, as the plans have moved from concept into the development assessment stage, the issue of short stay car parking is becoming an increasing concern, particularly for local businesses.
Council has attempted to reassure the community that there will actually be an overall increase of parking in the area. This is due to the introduction of short stay parking limits on car parking in surrounding streets and moving long stay parking into the new underground car park. By doing this the loss of the short stay parking in what is now the Council car park at Tryon Road will be offset.
However, it is clear that this reorganisation of parking availability proposed by the Council does not meet community expectations.
I am advised by staff that consideration of a development application for the project will take some 6-8 months and that any time prior to determination the scope of the project could be amended.
While the current assessment of the development application continues, I propose that staff investigate increasing underground short term parking spaces while maintaining the proposed commuter parking. This should include but not be limited to the feasibility, cost, and traffic implications of constructing a third level of basement parking for the new underground car park.
I am further advised that a full additional level of parking could provide approximately 140 short stay spaces on levels 1 and 2, and 100 commuter spaces over part of level 2 and all of level 3. The approximate cost of the additional level B3 is estimated to be between $5 million and $7 million, though no detailed design or cost estimates have been prepared.
It is my belief as Mayor that we must anticipate future demand for this transformation of Lindfield and the likely increase in visitation that will result. Our community will be living with the legacy of decisions this Council makes about Lindfield Village Green and it is therefore essential that Council future proofs the project.
That said, it is also essential for those in the community with an interest in this project to make submissions on the development application on public exhibition until 28 February. The Council is following due process in this regard.
|
|
Resolved:
1. That staff investigate increasing underground short-term parking spaces while maintaining the proposed commuter spaces, including a thorough cost analysis and funding sources, and report back to Council.
2. That an analysis of the flow on impact of these parking increases on surrounding streets and local intersections also be undertaken and brought back to council in the same report.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
|
Councillor Ossip withdrew during discussion
Councillor Ossip returned
29 |
Greater Sydney Planning Awards
File: S08662 Vide: MM.2
|
|
I am very pleased to advise Councillors and our community that Ku-ring-gai Council was awarded two commendations by the Greater Sydney Commission through their inaugural Greater Sydney Planning Awards.
The first commendation was for the Activate Ku-ring-gai program which involves planning for the renewal of our major centres. The second commendation was for the Lindfield Community Hub Master Plan.
A total of 11 awards were given out of 47 award submissions and our Council was the only entrant receiving two commendations.
The NSW Minister for Planning, Anthony Roberts and Chief Commissioner Lucy Turnbull AO presented the awards last week praising the high standard of entries and level of innovation they demonstrated. The judging panel’s comments on Lindfield Community Hub were as follows: “The project is envisaged as a catalyst project to drive investment, growth and social energy that will transform the suburban centre of Lindfield into an animated and dynamic urban village. Pro-active planning by Ku-ring gai Council has created a commercially attractive proposal to be delivered through a public private partnership, without compromising on intimacy of scale in the buildings and public spaces. Ongoing involvement of the local community has ensured the project meets the community’s vision; by leveraging their passion and expertise they have championed the project.” On the Activate Ku-ring-gai program, the judges had this to say about our submission: “Activate Ku-ring-gai is an ambitious program of urban renewal and transformation created and spearheaded by Ku-ring-gai Council. ……….The program involves community engagement and collaboration at multiple levels ranging from community and stakeholders, property industry, Councillors and State Government, and has garnered unrivalled support for the projects. Successful delivery of the projects will set a precedent for the design and delivery of community infrastructure in suburban centres within Greater Sydney. The judges commended Council on the innovative approach to engagement which serves as a model for other centres.” I pay tribute to the Council’s strategic planning staff and the consultants who have been engaged by Council to work on both projects. Their close cooperation and emphasis on consultation with the community have ensured a high level of responsiveness and design flexibility. Our Council prides itself on listening to our community and involving them in decision-making for the local area. I congratulate all those involved in Activate Ku-ring-gai and the Lindfield Community Hub and I look forwarded to seeing these projects transform our local centres in a positive and lasting legacy for Ku-ring-gai.
|
|
Resolved:
That Council receives and notes this Mayoral Minute.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY |
PETITIONS
30 |
Archdale Park - removal of uprights and concrete base (Thirty Five [35] Signatures)
File: S05692 Vide: PT.1
|
|
“We, the undersigned, request Council to remove the uprights and concrete base of the previously erected Shelter in Archdale Park. (Thirty five (35) signatures)”
Following a meeting on site at the Archdale Park on August 31st, 2016 involving the Mayor and Snr Constable Cleary the Mayor submitted a Mayoral Minute to Council re the same.
Amongst the other matters the Mayor proposed that:
“The Shelter in Betty Archdale Park be dismantled and stored at Council’s depot for possible re-use in the future or at an alternative site.”
As a result of this, the shelter, table and seat have been removed but the posts, which were concreted into the base of the shelter, were left standing, creating an eyesore to all that use the park or pass through it.
As none of the surrounding residents ever requested the installation of this shelter, which was the focal point of unnecessary bad behaviour by young adults until removed, we sincerely request that the shelter not be re-installed and the uprights and concrete slab be removed and replaced by lawn.
|
|
Resolved:
(Moved: Councillors Malicki/Armstrong)
That the petition be received and referred to the appropriate Officer of Council for attention.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY |
GENERAL BUSINESS
31 |
Analysis of Land and Environment Court Costs - 2nd Quarter 2016 to 2017
File: S05273 Vide: GB.2
|
|
To report legal costs in relation to development control matters in the Land and Environment Court for the quarter ended 31 December 2016.
|
|
Resolved:
(Moved: Councillors McDonald/Pettett)
That the analysis of Land and Environment Court costs for the quarter ended 31 December 2016 be received and noted.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY |
32 |
Investment Report as at 31 January 2017
File: S05273 Vide: GB.3
|
|
To present Council’s investment portfolio performance for January 2017.
|
|
Resolved:
(Moved: Councillors McDonald/Pettett)
A. That the summary of investments and performance for January 2017 be received and noted.
B. That the Certificate of the Responsible Accounting Officer be noted and the report adopted.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY |
33 |
2016 - 2017 Budget Review - 2nd Quarter ended December 2016
File: S09112/6 Vide: GB.4
|
|
To inform Council of the results of the 2nd quarter budget review of 2016/17 and seek approval to adjust the annual budget based on the actual financial performance and trend for the period 1 July 2016 to 31 December 2016.
|
|
Resolved:
(Moved: Councillors McDonald/Pettett)
That Council receive and note the December 2016 Quarterly Budget Review and adopt the recommended changes to the 2016/17 budget.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY |
34 |
2017 Australian Women's Leadership Symposium
File: FY00581/2 Vide: GB.5
|
|
To advise Council of the 2017 Australian Women’s Leadership Symposium.
|
|
Resolved:
(Moved: Councillors McDonald/Fornari-Orsmond)
That any Councillors interested in attending the 2017 Australian Women’s Symposium advise the General Manager by Wednesday, 5 April 2017.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY |
35 |
29-31 Moree Street, Gordon - Demolish existing dwellings and construct 15 town-houses including basement parking and landscaping works
File: DA0095/16 Vide: GB.6
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
To determine Development Application No. DA0095/16 to demolish existing dwellings and construct 15 town-houses, including basement parking and landscaping works.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Resolved:
(Moved: Councillors McDonald/Pettett)
A. THAT Council, as the consent authority, is of the opinion that the requests submitted under Clause 4.6 of Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan (Local Centres) 2012 to vary the building height and floor space ratio development standards have met the requirements of Clause 4.6(3) of KLEP (Local Centres) 2012. Council is also of the opinion that strict compliance with the development standards is unreasonable and unnecessary in the circumstances of the case and that there are sufficient environmental planning grounds to justify the variations to the development standards.
AND
B. THAT Council, as the consent authority, being satisfied that the proposed development will be in the public interest, grant development consent to DA0095/16 for the demolition of the existing dwellings and construction of 15 town-houses including basement parking and landscaping works on land at 29-31 Moree Street, Gordon, subject to conditions. Pursuant to Section 95(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979, this consent lapses if the approved works are not physically commenced within two years of the date of the Notice of Determination.
Conditions that identify approved plans:
1. Approved architectural plans and documentation (new development)
The development must be carried out in accordance with the following plans and documentation listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, except where amended by other conditions of this consent:
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
2. Inconsistency between documents
In the event of any inconsistency between conditions of this consent and the drawings/documents referred to above, the conditions of this consent prevail.
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
Conditions to be satisfied prior to demolition, excavation or construction:
3. Asbestos works
All work involving asbestos products and materials, including asbestos-cement-sheeting (ie. Fibro), must be carried out in accordance with the guidelines for asbestos work published by WorkCover Authority of NSW.
Reason: To ensure public safety/
4. Notice of commencement
At least 48 hours prior to the commencement of any development (including demolition, excavation, shoring or underpinning works), a notice of commencement of building or subdivision work form and appointment of the principal certifying authority form shall be submitted to Council.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
5. Notification of builder’s details
Prior to the commencement of any development or excavation works, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be notified in writing of the name and contractor licence number of the owner/builder intending to carry out the approved works.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
6. Dilapidation survey and report (public infrastructure)
Prior to the commencement of any development or excavation works on site, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a dilapidation report on the visible and structural condition of all structures of the following public infrastructure, has been completed and submitted to Council:
Public infrastructure
· Full road pavement width, including kerb and gutter, of Moree Street from Pacific Highway to the western extent of the site frontage. · All driveway crossings and laybacks opposite the subject site.
The report must be completed by a consulting structural/civil engineer. Particular attention must be paid to accurately recording (both written and photographic) existing damaged areas on the aforementioned infrastructure so that Council is fully informed when assessing any damage to public infrastructure caused as a result of the development.
The developer may be held liable to any recent damage to public infrastructure in the vicinity of the site, where such damage is not accurately recorded by the requirements of this condition prior to the commencement of works.
Note: A written acknowledgment from Council must be obtained (attesting to this condition being appropriately satisfied) and submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the commencement of any excavation works.
Reason: To record the structural condition of public infrastructure before works commence.
7. Dilapidation survey and report (private property)
Prior to the commencement of any demolition or excavation works on site, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a dilapidation report on the visible and structural condition of all structures upon the following lands, has been completed and submitted to Council:
The dilapidation report must include a photographic survey of adjoining properties detailing their physical condition, both internally and externally, including such items as walls ceilings, roof and structural members. The report must be completed by a consulting structural/geotechnical engineer as determined necessary by that professional based on the excavations for the proposal and the recommendations of the submitted geotechnical report.
In the event that access for undertaking the dilapidation survey is denied by a property owner, the applicant must demonstrate in writing to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority that all reasonable steps have been taken to obtain access and advise the affected property owner of the reason for the survey and that these steps have failed.
Note: A copy of the dilapidation report is to be provided to Council prior to any excavation works been undertaken. The dilapidation report is for record keeping purposes only and may be used by an applicant or affected property owner to assist in any civil action required to resolve any dispute over damage to adjoining properties arising from works.
Reason: To record the structural condition of likely affected properties before works commence.
8. Construction and traffic management plan
The applicant must submit to Council a Construction Traffic Management Plan (CTMP), which is to be approved prior to the commencement of any works on site.
The plan is to consist of a report with Traffic Control Plans attached.
The report is to contain commitments which must be followed by the demolition and excavation contractor, builder, owner and subcontractors. The CTMP applies to all persons associated with demolition, excavation and construction of the development.
The report is to contain construction vehicle routes for approach and departure to and from all directions.
The report is to contain a site plan showing entry and exit points. Swept paths are to be shown on the site plan showing access and egress for an 11 metre long heavy rigid vehicle.
The Traffic Control Plans are to be prepared by a qualified person (red card holder). One must be provided for each of the following stages of the works:
o demolition o excavation o concrete pour o construction of vehicular crossing and reinstatement of footpath o traffic control for vehicles reversing into or out of the site
Traffic controllers must be in place at the site entry and exit points to control heavy vehicle movements in order to maintain the safety of pedestrians and other road users.
When a satisfactory CTMP is received, a letter of approval will be issued with conditions attached. Traffic management at the site must comply with the approved CTMP as well as any conditions in the letter issued by Council. Council’s Rangers will be patrolling the site regularly and fines may be issued for any non-compliance with this condition.
Reason: To ensure that appropriate measures have been considered during all phases of the construction process in a manner that maintains the environmental amenity and ensures the ongoing safety and protection of people.
9. Work zone
A Works Zone is to be provided in Moree Street subject to the approval of the Ku-ring-gai Local Traffic Committee.
No loading or unloading must be undertaken from the public road or nature strip unless within a Works Zone which has been approved and paid for.
In the event the work zone is required for a period beyond that initially approved by the Traffic Committee, the applicant shall make a payment to Council for the extended period in accordance with Council’s schedule of fees and charges for work zones prior to the extended period commencing.
Reason: To ensure that appropriate measures have been made for the operation of the site during the construction phase.
10. Sediment controls
Prior to any work commencing on site, sediment and erosion control measures shall be installed along the contour immediately downslope of any future disturbed areas.
The form of the sediment controls to be installed on the site shall be determined by reference to the Landcom manual ‘Managing Urban Stormwater: Soils and Construction’. The erosion controls shall be maintained in an operational condition until the development activities have been completed and the site fully stabilised. Sediment shall be removed from the sediment controls following each heavy or prolonged rainfall period.
Reason: To preserve and enhance the natural environment.
11. Erosion and drainage management
Earthworks and/or demolition of any existing buildings shall not commence until an erosion and sediment control plan is submitted to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority. The plan shall comply with the guidelines set out in the NSW Department of Housing manual "Managing Urban Stormwater: Soils and Construction". Erosion and sediment control works shall be implemented in accordance with the erosion and sediment control plan.
Reason: To preserve and enhance the natural environment.
12. Marking of trees to be removed
All trees that are to be removed are to be clearly marked on site by the Project Arborist in accordance with the approved plans. All other trees are to be retained.
Reason: To protect existing trees during the construction phase.
13. Tree protection fencing
To preserve the following tree/s, no work shall commence until the area beneath their canopy is fenced off as per the approved Tree Protection Plan, Appendix A4, Arborist Report, Tree Talk, February 2016 and as amended by other conditions of consent to prevent any activities, storage or the disposal of materials within the fenced area. The fencing shall be maintained intact until the completion of all demolition/building work on site.
The tree protection fencing shall be constructed of galvanised pipe at 2.4 metre spacings and connected by securely attached chain mesh fencing to a minimum height of 1.8 metres in height prior to work commencing. Ground protection shall be in accordance with AS4970-2009 Protection of trees on development sites.
Reason: To protect existing trees during construction phase.
14. Tree protection signage
Prior to works commencing, tree protection signage is to be attached to each tree protection zone, displayed in a prominent position and the sign repeated at 10 metres intervals or closer where the fence changes direction. Each sign shall contain in a clearly legible form, the following information:
Tree protection zone.
· This fence has been installed to prevent damage to the trees and their growing environment both above and below ground and access is restricted. · Any encroachment not previously approved within the tree protection zone shall be the subject of an arborist's report. · The arborist's report shall provide proof that no other alternative is available. · The Arborist's report shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority for further consultation with Council. · The name, address, and telephone number of the developer.
Reason: To protect existing trees during the construction phase.
15. Tree fencing inspection
Upon installation of the required tree protection measures, an inspection of the site by the Principal Certifying Authority is required to verify that tree protection measures comply with all relevant conditions.
Reason: To protect existing trees during the construction phase.
16. Construction waste management plan
Prior to the commencement of any works, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a waste management plan, prepared by a suitably qualified person, has been prepared in accordance with Council’s Waste Management controls in the Ku-ring-gai Development Control Plan.
The plan shall address all issues identified in the DCP, including but not limited to: the estimated volume of waste and method for disposal for the construction and operation phases of the development.
Note: The plan shall be provided to the Certifying Authority.
Reason: To ensure appropriate management of construction waste.
17. Noise and vibration management plan
Prior to the commencement of any works, a noise and vibration management plan is to be prepared by a suitably qualified expert addressing the likely noise and vibration from demolition, excavation and construction of the proposed development and provided to the Principal Certifying Authority. The management plan is to identify amelioration measures to achieve the best practice objectives of AS 2436-2010 and NSW Department of Environment and Climate Change Interim Construction Noise Guidelines. The report shall be prepared in consultation with any geotechnical report that itemises equipment to be used for excavation works.
The management plan shall address, but not be limited to, the following matters:
· identification of the specific activities that will be carried out and associated noise sources · identification of all potentially affected sensitive receivers, including residences, churches, commercial premises, schools and properties containing noise sensitive equipment · the construction noise objective specified in the conditions of this consent · the construction vibration criteria specified in the conditions of this consent · determination of appropriate noise and vibration objectives for each identified sensitive receiver · noise and vibration monitoring, reporting and response procedures · assessment of potential noise and vibration from the proposed demolition, excavation and construction activities, including noise from construction vehicles and any traffic diversions · description of specific mitigation treatments, management methods and procedures that will be implemented to control noise and vibration during construction · construction timetabling to minimise noise impacts including time and duration restrictions, respite periods and frequency · procedures for notifying residents of construction activities that are likely to affect their amenity through noise and vibration · contingency plans to be implemented in the event of non-compliances and/or noise complaints
Reason: To protect the amenity afforded to surrounding residents during the construction process.
Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of the construction certificate:
18. Voluntary planning agreement
Prior to the issue of any Construction Certificate, the Planning Agreement between Ku-ring-gai Council and Moree Terraces Pty Ltd is to be executed and implemented in accordance with the timetable and terms set within the document.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
19. Lot consolidation
Prior to the commencement of works, the applicant must consolidate Lots 1 and 2 in DP 846768 and Lot 2 in DP212930 into one allotment which will form the development site. Evidence of lot consolidation, in the form of a plan registered with the Land and Property Information must be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the issue of a construction certificate.
Reason: To facilitate the orderly development of land.
20. Amendments to approved landscape plan
Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the approved landscape plans, listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, have been amended in accordance with the requirements of this condition as well as other conditions of this consent:
The above landscape plan(s) shall be amended as follows:
1. The landscape plans are to be amended in accordance with the architectural and stormwater plans and relevant conditions. All units are to be numbered in accordance with the approved architectural plans.
2. Top of wall heights to private courtyards are to be shown. Ground floor private open space, courtyard and terrace wall and fence heights are not to exceed, i) 1.2m to any street frontage or otherwise, ii) 1.8m with a maximum 1.2m high solid component and a minimum 30% transparent component above.
3. The landscape plan is to be amended to show proposed Option 1 flood control works in accordance with the stormwater plans.
4. Trees 7, 8 and 8a are not considered worthy of retention and are to be shown to be removed.
5. The proposed canopy tree planting of Angophora floribunda (Rough Barked Apple) located along the northern boundary within the vicinity of Trees A - D is to be substituted with Elaeocarpus reticulatus (Blueberry Ash) or similar.
6. The proposed canopy tree planting of Angophora costata (Sydney Red Gum) located along front boundary to new road is to be set back minimum of 5 metres from the proposed building.
7. The proposed planting of Angophora floribunda (Rough Barked Apple) as street trees to Moree Street and the new road are to be substituted with small trees such as Alectryon tomentosus (Rambutan), Lagestroemia indica or similar.
Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the amended landscape plan has been submitted as required by this condition.
Note: An amended landscape plan shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the Certifying Authority.
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
21. Privacy
To ensure that reasonable privacy is maintained to the adjoining property at 21-27 Moree Street, Gordon, the following measures shall be implemented:
· Fixed privacy screening shall be installed for the entire length of the east elevation of the roof terraces to TH5 and TH14. · The screening shall have a height of 1.6 metres above the finished floor level of the respective terrace. · The screening shall consist of durable materials, appropriately integrated, designed and maintained at all times so as to prevent direct overlooking of the adjoining property.
Details to the above effects are to be submitted to the satisfaction of the Certifying Authority, prior to issue of a Construction Certificate.
Reason: To maintain privacy.
22. Long service levy
In accordance with Section 109F(i) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act a Construction Certificate shall not be issued until any long service levy payable under Section 34 of the Building and Construction Industry Long Service Payments Act 1986 (or where such levy is payable by instalments, the first instalment of the levy) has been paid. Council is authorised to accept payment. Where payment has been made elsewhere, proof of payment is to be provided to Council.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
23. Builder’s indemnity insurance
The applicant, builder, developer or person who does the work on this development, must arrange builder’s indemnity insurance and submit the certificate of insurance in accordance with the requirements of Part 6 of the Home Building Act 1989 to the Certifying Authority for endorsement of the plans accompanying the Construction Certificate.
It is the responsibility of the applicant, builder or developer to arrange the builder's indemnity insurance for residential building work over the value of $20,000. The builder's indemnity insurance does not apply to commercial or industrial building work or to residential work valued at less than $20,000, nor to work undertaken by persons holding an owner/builder's permit issued by the Department of Fair Trading (unless the owner/builder's property is sold within 7 years of the commencement of the work).
Reason: Statutory requirement.
24. Outdoor lighting
Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that all outdoor lighting will comply with AS/NZ1158.3: 1999 Pedestrian Area (Category P) Lighting and AS4282: 1997 Control of the Obtrusive Effects of Outdoor Lighting.
Note: Details demonstrating compliance with these requirements are to be submitted prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate.
Reason: To provide high quality external lighting for security without adverse affects on public amenity from excessive illumination levels.
25. Air drying facilities
Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a common open space area dedicated for open air drying of clothes is provided. This area is to be located at ground level behind the building line and in a position not visible from the public domain.
In lieu of the above, written confirmation that all units will be provided with internal clothes drying facilities prior to the Occupation Certificate is to be submitted to the Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate.
Reason: Amenity & energy efficiency.
26. External service pipes and the like prohibited
Proposed water pipes, waste pipes, stack work, duct work, mechanical ventilation plant and the like must be located within the building. Details confirming compliance with this condition must be shown on construction certificate plans and detailed with construction certificate specifications. Required external vents or vent pipes on the roof or above the eaves must be shown on construction certificate plans and detailed with construction certificate specifications. External vents or roof vent pipes must not be visible from any place unless detailed upon development consent plans. Where there is any proposal to fit external service pipes or the like this must be detailed in an amended development (S96) application and submitted to Council for determination.
Vent pipes required by Sydney Water must not be placed on the front elevation of the building or front roof elevation. The applicant, owner and builder must protect the appearance of the building from the public place and the appearance of the streetscape by elimination of all external services excluding vent pipes required by Sydney Water and those detailed upon development consent plans.
Reason: To protect the streetscape and the integrity of the approved development.
27. Access for people with disabilities (residential)
Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that access for people with disabilities to and from and between the public domain, residential units and all common open space areas is provided. Consideration must be given to the means of dignified and equitable access.
Compliant access provisions for people with disabilities shall be clearly shown on the plans submitted with the Construction Certificate. All details shall be provided to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate. All details shall be prepared in consideration of the Disability Discrimination Act, and the relevant provisions of AS1428.1, AS1428.2, AS1428.4 and AS 1735.12.
Reason: To ensure the provision of equitable and dignified access for all people in accordance with disability discrimination legislation and relevant Australian Standards.
28. Adaptable units
Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the nominated adaptable units within the development application are designed as adaptable housing in accordance with the provisions of Australian Standard AS4299-1995: Adaptable Housing.
Note: Evidence from an appropriately qualified professional demonstrating compliance with this control is to be submitted to and approved by the Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate.
Reason: Disabled access & amenity.
29. Excavation for services
Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that no proposed underground services (ie: water, sewerage, drainage, gas or other service) unless previously approved by conditions of consent, are located beneath the canopy of any tree protected under Council’s Tree Preservation Order, located on the subject allotment and adjoining allotments.
Note: A plan detailing the routes of these services and trees protected under the Tree Preservation Order shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority.
Reason: To ensure the protection of trees.
30. Driveway crossing levels
Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, driveway and associated footpath levels for any new, reconstructed or extended sections of driveway crossings between the property boundary and road alignment must be obtained from Ku-ring-gai Council. Such levels are only able to be issued by Council under the Roads Act 1993. All footpath crossings, laybacks and driveways are to be constructed according to Council's specifications "Construction of Gutter Crossings and Footpath Crossings".
Specifications are issued with alignment levels after completing the necessary application form at Customer Services and payment of the assessment fee. When completing the request for driveway levels application from Council, the applicant must attach a copy of the relevant development application drawing which indicates the position and proposed level of the proposed driveway at the boundary alignment.
This development consent is for works wholly within the property. Development consent does not imply approval of footpath or driveway levels, materials or location within the road reserve, regardless of whether this information is shown on the development application plans. The grading of such footpaths or driveways outside the property shall comply with Council's standard requirements. The suitability of the grade of such paths or driveways inside the property is the sole responsibility of the applicant and the required alignment levels fixed by Council may impact upon these levels.
The construction of footpaths and driveways outside the property in materials other than those approved by Council is not permitted.
Reason: To provide suitable vehicular access without disruption to pedestrian and vehicular traffic.
31. Driveway grades - basement carparks
Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, longitudinal driveway sections are to be prepared by a qualified civil/traffic engineer and be submitted for to and approved by the Certifying Authority. These profiles are to be at 1:100 scale along both edges of the proposed driveway, starting from the centreline of the frontage street carriageway to the proposed basement floor level. The traffic engineer shall provide specific written certification on the plans that:
· vehicular access can be obtained using grades of 20% (1 in 5) maximum and · all changes in grade (transitions) comply with Australian Standard 2890.1 -“Off-street car parking” (refer clause 2.5.3) to prevent the scraping of the underside of vehicles.
If a new driveway crossing is proposed, the longitudinal sections must incorporate the driveway crossing levels as issued by Council upon prior application.
Reason: To provide suitable vehicular access without disruption to pedestrian and vehicular traffic.
32. Basement car parking details
Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, certified parking layout plan(s) to scale showing all aspects of the vehicle access and accommodation arrangements must be submitted to and approved by the Certifying Authority. A qualified civil/traffic engineer must review the proposed vehicle access and accommodation layout and provide written certification on the plans that:
· all parking space dimensions, driveway and aisle widths, driveway grades, transitions, circulation ramps, blind aisle situations and other trafficked areas comply with Australian Standard 2890.1 - 2004 “Off-street car parking” · a clear height clearance of 2.6 metres (required for waste collection trucks) is provided over the designated garbage collection truck manoeuvring areas within the basement · no doors or gates are provided in the access driveways to the basement carpark which would prevent unrestricted access for internal garbage collection at any time from the basement garbage storage and collection area · the vehicle access and accommodation arrangements are to be constructed and marked in accordance with the certified plans · a tap is to be provided adjacent to the car wash bay to make provision for on-site car washing
Reason: To ensure that parking spaces are in accordance with the approved development.
33. Car parking allocation
Car parking within the development shall be allocated as follows:
Each adaptable dwelling must be provided with car parking complying with the dimensional and location requirements of AS2890.1 - parking spaces for people with disabilities.
At least one visitor space shall also comply with the dimensional and location requirements of AS2890.1 - parking spaces for people with disabilities.
Consideration must be given to the means of access from disabled car parking spaces to other areas within the building and to footpath and roads and shall be clearly shown on the plans submitted with the Construction Certificate.
Reason: To ensure equity of access and appropriate facilities are available for people with disabilities in accordance with federal legislation.
34. Bicycle spaces
The bicycle parking spaces shall be designed in accordance with AS2890.3. Details shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the Certifying Authority prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate.
Reason: To provide alternative modes of transport to and from the site.
35. Design of works in public road or on Council trunk drainage system (Roads Act approval)
Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that engineering plans and specifications prepared by a qualified consulting engineer have been approved by Council’s Development Engineer. The plans to be assessed must be to a detail suitable for construction issue purposes and must detail the following infrastructure works required :
· new 750mm diameter reinforced concrete rubber ring jointed pipe to replace existing Council pipe within the subject property
Development consent does not give approval to these works in the road reserve. The applicant must obtain a separate approval under sections 138 and 139 of The Roads Act 1993 for the works in the road reserve or on Council's drainage system required as part of the development. The Construction Certificate must not be issued, and these works must not proceed until Council has issued a formal written approval under the Roads Act 1993.
The required plans and specifications are to be designed in accordance with the General Specification for the Construction of Road and Drainage Works in Ku-ring-gai Council, dated November 2004. The drawings must detail existing utility services and trees affected by the works, erosion control requirements and traffic management requirements during the course of works. Survey must be undertaken as required. Traffic management is to be certified on the drawings as being in accordance with the documents SAA HB81.1 - 1996 - Field Guide for Traffic Control at Works on Roads - Part 1 and RTA Traffic Control at Work Sites (1998). Construction of the works must proceed only in accordance with any conditions attached to the Roads Act approval issued by Council.
A minimum of three (3) weeks will be required for Council to assess the Roads Act application. Early submission of the Roads Act application is recommended to avoid delays in obtaining a Construction Certificate. An engineering assessment and inspection fee (set out in Council’s adopted fees and charges) is payable and Council will withhold any consent and approved plans until full payment of the correct fees. Plans and specifications must be marked to the attention of Council’s Development Engineers. In addition, a copy of this condition must be provided, together with a covering letter stating the full address of the property and the accompanying DA number.
Reason: To ensure that the plans are suitable for construction purposes.
36. Energy Australia requirements
Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, the applicant must contact Energy Australia regarding power supply for the subject development. A written response detailing the full requirements of Energy Australia (including any need for underground cabling, substations or similar within or in the vicinity the development) shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority for approval prior to issue of the Construction Certificate.
Any structures or other requirements of Energy Australia shall be indicated on the plans issued with the Construction Certificate, to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority and Energy Australia. The requirements of Energy Australia must be met in full prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate.
Reason: To ensure compliance with the requirements of Energy Australia.
37. Utility provider requirements
Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, the applicant must make contact with all relevant utility providers whose services will be impacted upon by the development. A written copy of the requirements of each provider, as determined necessary by the Certifying Authority, must be obtained. All utility services or appropriate conduits for the same must be provided by the developer in accordance with the specifications of the utility providers.
Reason: To ensure compliance with the requirements of relevant utility providers.
38. Underground services
All electrical services (existing and proposed) shall be undergrounded from the proposed building on the site to the appropriate power pole(s) or other connection point. Undergrounding of services must not disturb the root system of existing trees and shall be undertaken in accordance with the requirements of the relevant service provided. Documentary evidence that the relevant service provider has been consulted and that their requirements have been met are to be provided to the Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate. All electrical and telephone services to the subject property must be placed underground and any redundant poles are to be removed at the expense of the applicant.
Reason: To provide infrastructure that facilitates the future improvement of the streetscape by relocation of overhead lines below ground.
Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of the construction certificate or prior to demolition, excavation or construction (whichever comes first):
39. Infrastructure damage security bond and inspection fee
To ensure that any damage to Council property as a result of construction activity is rectified in a timely matter:
(a) All work or activity undertaken pursuant to this development consent must be undertaken in a manner to avoid damage to Council property and must not jeopardise the safety of any person using or occupying the adjacent public areas.
(b) The applicant, builder, developer or any person acting in reliance on this consent shall be responsible for making good any damage to Council property and for the removal from Council property of any waste bin, building materials, sediment, silt, or any other material or article.
(c) The Infrastructure damage security bond and infrastructure inspection fee must be paid to Council by the applicant prior to both the issue of the Construction Certificate and the commencement of any earthworks or construction.
(d) In consideration of payment of the infrastructure damage security bond and infrastructure inspection fee, Council will undertake such inspections of Council Property as Council considers necessary and will also undertake, on behalf of the applicant, such restoration work to Council property, if any, that Council considers necessary as a consequence of the development. The provision of such restoration work by the Council does not absolve any person of the responsibilities contained in (a) to (b) above. Restoration work to be undertaken by Council referred to in this condition is limited to work that can be undertaken by Council at a cost of not more than the Infrastructure damage security bond payable pursuant to this condition.
(e) In this condition:
“Council property” includes any road, footway, footpath paving, kerbing, guttering, crossings, street furniture, seats, letter bins, trees, shrubs, lawns, mounds, bushland, and similar structures or features on any road or public road within the meaning of the Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) or any public place; and
“Infrastructure damage security bond and infrastructure inspection fee” means the Infrastructure damage security bond and infrastructure inspection fee as calculated in accordance with the Schedule of Fees & Charges adopted by Council as at the date of payment and the cost of any inspections required by the Council of Council property associated with this condition.
Reason: To maintain public infrastructure.
40. Section 94 Contributions - Centres. (For DAs determined on or after 19 December 2010)
This development is subject to a development contribution calculated in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010, being a s94 Contributions Plan in effect under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, as follows:
Infrastructure Type Total Gordon TC Local Parks & Sporting Facilities $198,848.07 Gordon TC New Roads & Road Mods $88,515.18 Gordon TC Townscape Transport & Pedest Fac $98,453.85 LGA Wide Local Recreational & Cultural $27,548.52
Development Contributions Total $413,365.62
The development involves works-in-kind in accordance with a Voluntary Planning Agreement (VPA) referenced in other conditions of this consent. The monetary amount of the development contributions will be directed in accordance with that VPA once executed. In the event that a VPA is not executed, then the above monetary contributions will be due and payable prior to the issue of any Construction Certificate, in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010.
The contributions specified above are subject to indexation and will continue to be indexed to reflect changes in the consumer price index and housing price index until they are paid in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 to reflect changes in the consumer price index and housing price index, or as otherwise agreed within the VPA once executed. If a VPA is not executed, then prior to payment, please contact Council directly to verify the current payable contributions.
Copies of Council’s Contribution Plans can be viewed at Council Chambers, 818 Pacific Hwy Gordon or on Council’s website at www.kmc.nsw.gov.au.
Reason: To ensure the provision, extension or augmentation of the Key Community Infrastructure identified in Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 that will, or is likely to be, required as a consequence of the development.
Conditions to be satisfied during the demolition, excavation and construction phases:
41. Road opening permit
The opening of any footway, roadway, road shoulder or any part of the road reserve shall not be carried out without a road opening permit being obtained from Council (upon payment of the required fee) beforehand.
Reason: Statutory requirement (Roads Act 1993 Section 138) and to maintain the integrity of Council’s infrastructure.
42. Prescribed conditions
The applicant shall comply with any relevant prescribed conditions of development consent under clause 98 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation. For the purposes of section 80A (11) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, the following conditions are prescribed in relation to a development consent for development that involves any building work:
· The work must be carried out in accordance with the requirements of the Building Code of Australia · In the case of residential building work for which the Home Building Act 1989 requires there to be a contract of insurance in force in accordance with Part 6 of that Act, that such a contract of insurance is in force before any works commence.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
43. Hours of work
Demolition, construction work and deliveries of building material and equipment must not take place outside the hours of 7.00am to 5.00pm Monday to Friday and 8.00am to 12 noon Saturday. No work and no deliveries are to take place on Sundays and public holidays.
Excavation using machinery must be limited to between 7.00am and 5.00pm Monday to Friday, with a respite break of 45 minutes between 12 noon and 1.00pm. No excavation using machinery is to occur on Saturdays, Sundays or public holidays.
Where it is necessary for works to occur outside of these hours (ie) placement of concrete for large floor areas on large residential/commercial developments or where building processes require the use of oversized trucks and/or cranes that are restricted by the RTA from travelling during daylight hours to deliver, erect or remove machinery, tower cranes, pre-cast panels, beams, tanks or service equipment to or from the site, approval for such activities will be subject to the issue of an "outside of hours works permit" from Council as well as notification of the surrounding properties likely to be affected by the proposed works.
Note: Failure to obtain a permit to work outside of the approved hours will result in on the spot fines being issued.
Reason: To ensure reasonable standards of amenity for occupants of neighbouring properties.
44. Approved plans to be on site
A copy of all approved and certified plans, specifications and documents incorporating conditions of consent and certification (including the Construction Certificate if required for the work) shall be kept on site at all times during the demolition, excavation and construction phases and must be readily available to any officer of Council or the Principal Certifying Authority.
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
45. Engineering fees
For the purpose of any development related inspections by Ku-ring-gai Council engineers, the corresponding fees set out in Councils adopted Schedule of Fees and Charges are payable to Council. A re-inspection fee per visit may be charged where work is unprepared at the requested time of inspection, or where remedial work is unsatisfactory and a further inspection is required. Engineering fees must be paid in full prior to any final consent from Council.
Reason: To protect public infrastructure.
46. Statement of compliance with Australian Standards
The demolition work shall comply with the provisions of Australian Standard AS2601: 2001 The Demolition of Structures. The work plans required by AS2601: 2001 shall be accompanied by a written statement from a suitably qualified person that the proposal contained in the work plan comply with the safety requirements of the Standard. The work plan and the statement of compliance shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the commencement of any works.
Reason: To ensure compliance with the Australian Standards.
47. Construction noise
During excavation, demolition and construction phases, noise generated from the site shall be controlled in accordance with the recommendations of the approved noise and vibration management plan.
Reason: To ensure reasonable standards of amenity to neighbouring properties.
48. Site notice
A site notice shall be erected on the site prior to any work commencing and shall be displayed throughout the works period.
The site notice must:
· be prominently displayed at the boundaries of the site for the purposes of informing the public that unauthorised entry to the site is not permitted · display project details including, but not limited to the details of the builder, Principal Certifying Authority and structural engineer · be durable and weatherproof · display the approved hours of work, the name of the site/project manager, the responsible managing company (if any), its address and 24 hour contact phone number for any inquiries, including construction/noise complaint are to be displayed on the site notice · be mounted at eye level on the perimeter hoardings/fencing and is to state that unauthorised entry to the site is not permitted
Reason: To ensure public safety and public information.
49. Dust control
During excavation, demolition and construction, adequate measures shall be taken to prevent dust from affecting the amenity of the neighbourhood. The following measures must be adopted:
· physical barriers shall be erected at right angles to the prevailing wind direction or shall be placed around or over dust sources to prevent wind or activity from generating dust · earthworks and scheduling activities shall be managed to coincide with the next stage of development to minimise the amount of time the site is left cut or exposed · all materials shall be stored or stockpiled at the best locations · the ground surface should be dampened slightly to prevent dust from becoming airborne but should not be wet to the extent that run-off occurs · all vehicles carrying spoil or rubble to or from the site shall at all times be covered to prevent the escape of dust · all equipment wheels shall be washed before exiting the site using manual or automated sprayers and drive-through washing bays · gates shall be closed between vehicle movements and shall be fitted with shade cloth · cleaning of footpaths and roadways shall be carried out daily
Reason: To protect the environment and amenity of surrounding properties.
50. Further geotechnical input
The geotechnical and hydro-geological works implementation, inspection, testing and monitoring program for the excavation and construction works must be in accordance with the report by Environmental Investigations Australia dated 9 September 2015. Over the course of the works, a qualified geotechnical/hydro-geological engineer must complete the following:
· further geotechnical investigations and testing recommended in the above report(s) and as determined necessary · further monitoring and inspection at the hold points recommended in the above report(s) and as determined necessary · written report(s) including certification(s) of the geotechnical inspection, testing and monitoring programs
Reason: To ensure the safety and protection of property.
51. Compliance with submitted geotechnical report
A contractor with specialist excavation experience must undertake the excavations for the development and a suitably qualified and consulting geotechnical engineer must oversee excavation.
Geotechnical aspects of the development work, namely:
· appropriate excavation method and vibration control · support and retention of excavated faces · hydro-geological considerations
must be undertaken in accordance with the recommendations of the geotechnical report prepared by Environmental Investigations Australia dated 9 September 2015. Approval must be obtained from all affected property owners, including Ku-ring-gai Council, where rock anchors (both temporary and permanent) are proposed below adjoining property(ies).
Reason: To ensure the safety and protection of property.
52. Use of road or footpath
During excavation, demolition and construction phases, no building materials, plant or the like are to be stored on the road or footpath without written approval being obtained from Council beforehand. The pathway shall be kept in a clean, tidy and safe condition during building operations. Council reserves the right, without notice, to rectify any such breach and to charge the cost against the applicant/owner/builder, as the case may be.
Reason: To ensure safety and amenity of the area.
53. Guarding excavations
All excavation, demolition and construction works shall be properly guarded and protected with hoardings or fencing to prevent them from being dangerous to life and property.
Reason: To ensure public safety.
54. Toilet facilities
During excavation, demolition and construction phases, toilet facilities are to be provided, on the work site, at the rate of one toilet for every 20 persons or part of 20 persons employed at the site.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
55. Protection of public places
If the work involved in the erection, demolition or construction of the development is likely to cause pedestrian or vehicular traffic in a public place to be obstructed or rendered inconvenient, or building involves the enclosure of a public place, a hoarding or fence must be erected between the work site and the public place.
If necessary, a hoarding is to be erected, sufficient to prevent any substance from, or in connection with, the work falling into the public place.
The work site must be kept lit between sunset and sunrise if it is likely to be hazardous to persons in the public place.
Any hoarding, fence or awning is to be removed when the work has been completed.
Reason: To protect public places.
56. Recycling of building material (general)
During demolition and construction, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that building materials suitable for recycling have been forwarded to an appropriate registered business dealing in recycling of materials. Materials to be recycled must be kept in good order.
Reason: To facilitate recycling of materials.
57. Construction signage
All construction signs must comply with the following requirements:
· are not to cover any mechanical ventilation inlet or outlet vent · are not illuminated, self-illuminated or flashing at any time · are located wholly within a property where construction is being undertaken · refer only to the business(es) undertaking the construction and/or the site at which the construction is being undertaken · are restricted to one such sign per property · do not exceed 2.5m2 · are removed within 14 days of the completion of all construction works
Reason: To ensure compliance with Council's controls regarding signage.
58. Approval for rock anchors
Approval is to be obtained from the property owner for any anchors proposed beneath adjoining private property. If such approval cannot be obtained, then the excavated faces are to be shored or propped in accordance with the recommendations of the geotechnical and structural engineers.
Reason: To ensure the ongoing safety and protection of property.
59. Maintenance period for works in public road
A maintenance period of six (6) months applies to all work in the public road reserve or on Council’s trunk drainage system carried out by the applicant - after the works have been completed to the satisfaction of Ku-ring-gai Council. In that maintenance period, the applicant shall be liable for any section of the public infrastructure work which fails to perform in the designed manner, or as would reasonably be expected under the operating conditions. The maintenance period shall commence once the applicant receives a formal letter from Council stating that the works involving public infrastructure have been completed satisfactorily.
Reason: To protect public infrastructure.
60. Road reserve safety
All public footways and roadways fronting and adjacent to the site must be maintained in a safe condition at all times during the course of the development works. Construction materials must not be stored in the road reserve. A safe pedestrian circulation route and a pavement/route free of trip hazards must be maintained at all times on or adjacent to any public access ways fronting the construction site. Where public infrastructure is damaged, repair works must be carried out when and as directed by Council officers. Where pedestrian circulation is diverted on to the roadway or verge areas, clear directional signage and protective barricades must be installed in accordance with AS1742-3 (1996) “Traffic Control Devices for Work on Roads”. If pedestrian circulation is not satisfactorily maintained across the site frontage, and action is not taken promptly to rectify the defects, Council may undertake proceedings to stop work.
Reason: To ensure safe public footways and roadways during construction.
61. Services
Where required, the adjustment or inclusion of any new utility service facilities must be carried out by the applicant and in accordance with the requirements of the relevant utility authority. These works shall be at no cost to Council. It is the applicants’ full responsibility to make contact with the relevant utility authorities to ascertain the impacts of the proposal upon utility services (including water, phone, gas and the like). Council accepts no responsibility for any matter arising from its approval to this application involving any influence upon utility services provided by another authority.
Reason: Provision of utility services.
62. Temporary rock anchors
If the use of temporary rock anchors extending into the road reserve is proposed, then approval must be obtained from Council and/or the Roads and Traffic Authority in accordance with Section 138 of the Roads Act 1993. The Applicant is to submit details of all the work that is to be considered, and the works are not to commence until approval has been granted. The designs are to include details of the following:
· How the temporary rock anchors will be left in a way that they will not harm or interfere with any future excavation in the public road · That the locations of the rock anchors are registered with Dial Before You Dig · That approval of all utility authorities likely to use the public road has been obtained. All temporary rock anchors are located outside the allocations for the various utilities as adopted by the Streets Opening Conference. · That any remaining de-stressed rock anchors are sufficiently isolated from the structure that they cannot damage the structure if pulled during future excavations or work in the public road. · That signs will be placed and maintained on the building stating that de-stressed rock anchors remain in the public road and include a contact number for the building manager. The signs are to be at least 600mm x 450mm with lettering on the signs is to be no less than 75mm high. The signs are to be at not more than 60m spacing. At least one sign must be visible from all locations on the footpath outside the property. The wording on the signs is to be submitted to Council’s Director Technical Services for approval before any signs are installed.
Permanent rock anchors are not to be used where any part of the anchor extends outside the development site into public areas or road reserves.
All works in the public road are to be carried out in accordance with the Conditions of Construction issued with any approval of works granted under Section 138 of the Roads Act 1993.
Reason: To ensure the ongoing safety and protection of property.
63. Sydney Water Section 73 Compliance Certificate
The applicant must obtain a Section 73 Compliance Certificate under the Sydney Water Act 1994. An application must be made through an authorised Water Servicing CoOrdinator. The applicant is to refer to “Your Business” section of Sydney Water’s web site at www.sydneywater.com.au <http://www.sydneywater.com.au> then the “e-develop” icon or telephone 13 20 92. Following application a “Notice of Requirements” will detail water and sewer extensions to be built and charges to be paid. Please make early contact with the CoOrdinator, since building of water/sewer extensions can be time consuming and may impact on other services and building, driveway or landscape design.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
64. Project arborist
A suitably qualified project arborist (AQF level 5) is to be engaged to advise the Principal Certifying Authority on the protection of trees at the site and to supervise the installation and maintenance of tree protection measures required by this consent.
Prior to the commencement of any works including demolition on the site in areas required to be protected by this consent, the project arborist shall inspect the site and satisfy himself/herself that the protection measures are in accordance with the approved design and must provide a written certification to the Principal Certifying Authority to that effect.
If not satisfied, the project arborist must provide to the Principal Certifying Authority a list of works that are to be completed to ensure compliance with all conditions of consent relating to the protection of trees at the site. Those works must be undertaken to the satisfaction of the project arborist.
Reason: To ensure protection of existing trees.
65. Arborist’s report
All trees to be retained shall be inspected and monitored by an AQF Level 5 Arborist in accordance with AS4970-2009 and Section 9.2, Arboricultural Impact Assessment prepared by Tree Talk and dated February 2016 during and after completion of development works to ensure their long term survival. Regular inspections and documentation from the project arborist to the Principal Certifying Authority are required during all works within the canopy spread of all existing trees on site and overhanging from adjoining sites, including date, brief description of the works inspected, and any mitigation works prescribed.
All monitoring shall be provided to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate.
All works as recommended by the project arborist are to be undertaken by an experienced arborist with a minimum AQF Level 3 qualification.
Reason: To ensure protection of existing trees.
66. Trees on nature strip
Removal of the following tree/s from Council's nature strip shall be undertaken at no cost to Council by an experienced tree removal contractor/arborist holding public liability insurance amounting to a minimum cover of $10,000,000:
Reason: To ensure protection of existing trees.
67. Canopy/root pruning
Canopy and/or root pruning of the following tree/s which is necessary to accommodate the approved building works shall be undertaken by an experienced Arborist/Horticulturist, with a minimum qualification of the Horticulture Certificate or Tree Surgery Certificate. All pruning works shall be undertaken as specified in Australian Standard 4373-2007 - Pruning of Amenity Trees.
Reason: To protect the environment.
68. Treatment of tree roots
If tree roots are required to be severed for the purposes of constructing the approved works, they shall be cut cleanly by hand, by an experienced Arborist/Horticulturist with a minimum qualification of Horticulture Certificate or Tree Surgery Certificate. All pruning works shall be undertaken as specified in Australian Standard 4373-2007 – Pruning of Amenity Trees.
Reason: To protect existing trees.
69. Hand excavation
All excavation except for the basement and driveway within the specified radius of the trunk(s) of the following tree(s) shall be hand dug:
Reason: To protect existing trees.
70. Thrust boring
Excavation for the installation of any services within the specified radius of the trunk/s of the following tree/s shall utilise the thrust boring method. Thrust boring shall be carried out at least 600mm beneath natural ground level to minimise damage to tree/s root system:
Reason: To protect existing trees.
71. No storage of materials beneath trees
No activities, storage or disposal of materials shall take place beneath the canopy of any tree protected under Council's Tree Preservation Order at any time.
Reason: To protect existing trees.
72. Removal of refuse
All builders' refuse, spoil and/or material unsuitable for use in landscape areas shall be removed from the site on completion of the building works.
Reason: To protect the environment.
73. Canopy replenishment trees to be planted
The canopy replenishment trees to be planted shall be maintained in a healthy and vigorous condition until they attain a height of 5.0 metres whereby they will be protected by Council’s Tree Preservation Order. Any of the trees found faulty, damaged, dying or dead shall be replaced with the same species.
Reason: To maintain the treed character of the area.
74. Survey and inspection of waste collection clearance and path of travel
At the stage when formwork for the ground floor slab is in place and prior to concrete being poured, a registered surveyor is to:
· ascertain the reduced level of the underside of the slab at the driveway entry · certify that the level is not lower than the level shown on the approved DA plans · certify that the minimum headroom of 2.6 metres will be available for the full path of travel of the small waste collection vehicle from the street to the collection area · this certification is to be provided to Council’s Development Engineer prior to any concrete being poured for the ground floor slab · no work is to proceed until Council has undertaken an inspection to determine clearance and path of travel
At the stage when formwork for the ground floor slab is in place and prior to concrete being poured, Council’s Development Engineer and Manager Waste Services are to carry out an inspection of the site to confirm the clearance available for the full path of travel of the small waste collection vehicle from the street to the collection area. This inspection may not be carried out by a private certifier because waste management is not a matter listed in Clause 161 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000.
Reason: To ensure access will be available for Council’s contractors to collect waste from the collection point.
75. On site retention of waste dockets
All demolition, excavation and construction waste dockets are to be retained on site, or at suitable location, in order to confirm which facility received materials generated from the site for recycling or disposal.
· Each docket is to be an official receipt from a facility authorised to accept the material type, for disposal or processing. · This information is to be made available at the request of an Authorised Officer of Council.
Reason: To protect the environment.
Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate:
76. Easement for waste collection
Prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that an easement for waste collection has been created under Section 88B of the Conveyancing Act 1919. The terms of the easement are to be generally in accordance with Council's draft terms for an easement for waste collection and shall be to the satisfaction of Council's Development Engineer.
Reason: To permit legal access for Council, Council's contractors and their vehicles over the subject site for waste collection.
77. Relocation of Council drainage easement
Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that an easement benefitting Ku-ring-gai Council has been created over the relocated pipe within the subject property.
Note: Council will not endorse the easement documentation for submission at the Department of Lands until it is satisfied that the works have been carried out in accordance with all conditions imposed by Council in its approval for the relocation of the easement. This includes but is not limited to payment of fees and other monies, inspections and certifications and review of the documentation by Council’s solicitor at the applicant’s expense.
Reason: To protect Council's infrastructure.
78. Compliance with BASIX Certificate
Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that all commitments listed in BASIX Certificate No. 705453M_03 have been complied with.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
79. Clotheslines and clothes dryers
Prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the units either have access to an external clothes line located in common open space or have a mechanical clothes dryer installed.
Reason: To provide access to clothes drying facilities.
80. Completion of landscape works
Prior to the release of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that all landscape works, including the removal of all noxious and/or environmental weed species, have been undertaken in accordance with the approved plan(s) and conditions of consent.
Reason: To ensure that the landscape works are consistent with the development consent.
81. Completion of tree works
Prior to the release of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that all tree works, including pruning in accordance with AS4373-2007 or remediation works in accordance with AS4370-2009, have been undertaken in accordance with the approved plan(s) and conditions of consent.
Reason: To ensure that the tree works are consistent with the development consent.
82. Accessibility
Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that:
· the lift design and associated functions are compliant with AS 1735.12 & AS 1428.2 · the level and direction of travel, both in lifts and lift lobbies, is audible and visible · the controls for lifts are accessible to all persons and control buttons and lettering are raised · international symbols have been used with specifications relating to signs, symbols and size of lettering complying with AS 1428.2 · the height of lettering on signage is in accordance with AS 1428.1 – 1993 · the signs and other information indicating access and services incorporate tactile communication methods in addition to the visual methods
Reason: Disabled access & services.
83. Certification of drainage works
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that:
· the stormwater drainage works have been satisfactorily completed in accordance with the approved Construction Certificate drainage plans · the minimum retention and on-site detention storage volume requirements of Ku-ring-gai Development Control Plan have been achieved · retained water is connected and available for use · all grates potentially accessible by children are secured · components of the new drainage system have been installed by a licensed plumbing contractor in accordance with the Plumbing and Drainage Code AS3500.3 2003 and the Building Code of Australia · all enclosed floor areas, including habitable and garage floor levels, are safeguarded from outside stormwater runoff ingress by suitable differences in finished levels, gradings and provision of stormwater collection devices
Note: Evidence from a qualified and experienced consulting civil/hydraulic engineer documenting compliance with the above is to be provided to Council prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate.
Reason: To protect the environment.
84. WAE plans for stormwater management and disposal
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, a registered surveyor must provide a works as executed survey of the completed stormwater drainage and management systems. The survey must be submitted to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate. The survey must indicate:
· as built (reduced) surface and invert levels for all drainage pits · gradients of drainage lines, materials and dimensions · as built (reduced) level(s) at the approved point of discharge to the public drainage system · as built location and internal dimensions of all detention and retention structures on the property (in plan view) and horizontal distances to nearest adjacent boundaries and structures on site · the achieved storage volumes of the installed retention and detention storages and derivative calculations · as built locations of all access pits and grates in the detention and retention system(s) including dimensions · the size of the orifice or control fitted to any on-site detention system · dimensions of the discharge control pit and access grates · the maximum depth of storage possible over the outlet control · top water levels of storage areas and indicative RL’s through the overland flow path in the event of blockage of the on-site detention system
The works as executed plan(s) must show the as built details above in comparison to those shown on the drainage plans approved with the Construction Certificate prior to commencement of works. All relevant levels and details indicated must be marked in red on a copy of the Principal Certifying Authority stamped construction certificate stormwater plans.
Reason: To protect the environment.
85. OSD positive covenant/restriction
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the applicant must create a positive covenant and restriction on the use of land under Section 88B or 88E of the Conveyancing Act 1919, burdening the owner with the requirement to maintain the on-site stormwater detention facilities on the lot.
The terms of the instruments are to be generally in accordance with the Council's "draft terms of Section 88B instrument for protection of on-site detention facilities" and to the satisfaction of Council (refer to Part 24R.8 of Ku-ring-gai DCP). For existing titles, the positive covenant and the restriction on the use of land is to be created through an application to the Land Titles Office in the form of a request using forms 13PC and 13RPA. The relative location of the on-site detention facility, in relation to the building footprint, must be shown on a scale sketch, attached as an annexure to the request forms.
Registered title documents, showing the covenants and restrictions, must be submitted and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate.
Reason: To protect the environment.
86. CCTV report of pipe after work
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, but after completion of all works on site, a closed circuit television inspection and report on the new Council drainage pipeline traversing the site is to be undertaken by appropriate contractors and provided to Council’s Development Engineer. The report is to include a copy of the footage of the inside of the pipeline. Any damage that has occurred to the section of the pipeline since its installation must be repaired in full to the satisfaction of Council’s Development Engineer at no cost to Council.
Reason: To protect the environment.
87. Sydney Water Section 73 Compliance Certificate
Prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate the Section 73 Sydney water Compliance Certificate must be obtained and submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority
Reason: Statutory requirement.
88. Certification of as-constructed driveway/carpark
Prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that:
· the as-constructed car park complies with the approved Construction Certificate plans
· the completed vehicle access and accommodation arrangements comply with Australian Standard 2890.1 - 2004 “Off-Street car parking" in terms of minimum parking space dimensions
· finished driveway gradients and transitions will not result in the scraping of the underside of cars
· no doors, gates, grilles or other structures have been provided in the access driveways to the basement carpark, which would prevent unrestricted access for internal garbage collection from the basement garbage storage and collection area
· the vehicular headroom requirements of: - Australian Standard 2890.1 - “Off-street car parking”, - 2.6 metres height clearance for waste collection trucks are met from the public street into and within the applicable areas of the basement carpark.
Note: Evidence from a suitably qualified and experienced traffic/civil engineer indicating compliance with the above is to be provided to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate.
Reason: To ensure that vehicular access and accommodation areas are compliant with the consent.
89. Reinstatement of redundant crossings and completion of infrastructure works
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, but not until completion of all works on site, the Principal Certifying Authority must be satisfied that he or she has received a signed inspection form from Council which states that the following works in the road reserve have been completed:
· new concrete driveway crossing in accordance with levels and specifications issued by Council · removal of all redundant driveway crossings and kerb laybacks (or sections thereof) and reinstatement of these areas to footpath, turfed verge and upright kerb and gutter (reinstatement works to match surrounding adjacent infrastructure with respect to integration of levels and materials) · full repair and resealing of any road surface damaged during construction · full replacement of damaged sections of grass verge to match existing
This inspection may not be carried out by the Private Certifier because restoration of Council property outside the boundary of the site is not a matter listed in Clause 161 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000.
All works must be completed in accordance with the General Specification for the Construction of Road and Drainage Works in Ku-ring-gai Council, dated November 2004. The Occupation Certificate must not be issued until all damaged public infrastructure caused as a result of construction works on the subject site (including damage caused by, but not limited to, delivery vehicles, waste collection, contractors, sub-contractors, concrete vehicles) is fully repaired to the satisfaction of Council. Repair works shall be at no cost to Council.
Reason: To protect the streetscape.
90. Construction of works in public road - approved plans
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority must be satisfied that all approved road, footpath and/or drainage works have been completed in the road reserve and within the property in accordance with the Council Roads Act approval and accompanying drawings, conditions and specifications.
The works must be supervised by the applicant’s designing engineer and completed and approved to the satisfaction of Ku-ring-gai Council.
The supervising consulting engineer is to provide certification upon completion that the works were constructed in accordance with the Council approved stamped drawings. The works must be subject to inspections by Council at the hold points noted on the Roads Act approval. All conditions attached to the approved drawings for these works must be met prior to the Occupation Certificate being issued.
Reason: To ensure that works undertaken in the road reserve are to the satisfaction of Council.
91. Mechanical ventilation
Prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that all mechanical ventilation systems are installed in accordance with Part F4.5 of the Building Code of Australia and comply with Australian Standards AS1668.2 and AS3666 Microbial Control of Air Handling and Water Systems of Building.
Reason: To ensure adequate levels of health and amenity to the occupants of the building.
92. Fire safety certificate
Prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a Fire Safety Certificate for all the essential fire or other safety measures forming part of this consent has been completed and provided to Council.
Note: A copy of the Fire Safety Certificate must be submitted to Council.
Reason: To ensure suitable fire safety measures are in place.
93. Certification of car stacking system
A suitably qualified traffic or structural engineer must certify that the car stacking system is structurally sound and has been installed in accordance with the manufacturer’s standards and guidelines. The certification must also confirm that the device is operating satisfactorily. The certificates are to be provided to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate.
Reason: To ensure adequate parking provision.
94. Car stacking system positive covenant
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the applicant must create a Positive Covenant under Section 88 E of the Conveyancing Act 1919, burdening the owner with the requirement to maintain the car stacking system on the property. Registered title documents showing the covenant must be submitted to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate.
Reason: To ensure adequate parking provision.
Conditions to be satisfied at all times:
95. Annual fire safety statement
Each 12 months after the installation of essential fire or other safety measures, the owner of a building must cause the Council to be given an Annual Fire Safety Statement for the building. In addition a copy of the statement must be given to the NSW Fire Commissioner and displayed prominently in the building.
Reason: To ensure statutory maintenance of essential fire safety measures.
96. Outdoor lighting
At all times for the life of the approved development, all outdoor lighting shall not detrimentally impact upon the amenity of other premises and adjacent dwellings and shall comply with, where relevant, AS/NZ1158.3: 2005 Pedestrian Area (Category P) Lighting and AS4282: 1997 Control of the Obtrusive Effects of Outdoor Lighting.
Reason: To protect the amenity of surrounding properties.
97. No door restricting internal waste collection in basement
At all times, the basement garbage storage and collection area is to be accessible by Council’s Waste Collection Services. No doors, grilles, gates or other devices shall be provided in any location which would prevent this service. Where a gate, door or the like is to be erected, unimpeded access to the garbage collection point is to be provided by other means through written agreement with Council’s Waste Collection Services.
Reason: To facilitate access to the garbage collection point.
98. Noise control – plant and machinery
All noise generating equipment associated with any proposed mechanical ventilation system/s shall be located and/or soundproofed so the equipment is not audible within a habitable room in any other residential premises before 7am and after 10pm Monday to Friday and before 8am and after 10pm Saturday, Sunday and public holidays. The operation of the unit outside these restricted hours shall emit a noise level of not greater than 5dbA above the background when measured at the nearest boundary.
Reason: To protect the amenity of surrounding residents.
99. Car parking
At all times, the visitor car parking spaces are to be clearly identified and are to be for the exclusive use of visitors to the site. On site permanent car parking spaces are not to be used by those other than an occupant or tenant of the subject building. Any occupant, tenant, lessee or registered proprietor of the development site or part thereof shall not enter into an agreement to lease, license or transfer ownership of any car parking spaces to those other than an occupant, tenant or lessee of the building. These requirements are to be enforced through the following:
· restrictive covenant placed on title pursuant to Section 88B of the Conveyancing Act, 1919 · restriction on use under Section 68 of the Strata Schemes (Leasehold Development) Act, 1986 to all lots comprising in part or whole car parking spaces
Reason: To ensure adequate provision of visitor parking spaces.
100. Loading and unloading
At all times, all loading and unloading of service vehicles in connection with the use of the premises shall be carried out wholly within the site.
Reason: To ensure safe traffic movement.
101. Unobstructed driveways and parking areas
At all times, all driveways and parking areas shall be unobstructed. Driveways and car spaces shall not be used for the manufacture, storage or display of goods, materials or any other equipment and shall be used solely for vehicular access and for the parking of vehicles associated with the use of the premises.
Reason: To ensure safe traffic movement.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY |
36 |
Delivery Program 2013-2017 and Operational Plan 2016-2017 - Bi-Annual Report
File: FY00382/9 Vide: GB.8
|
|
To report to Council on the progress of the Delivery Program 2013/2017 and Operational Plan 2016/2017, for the period July to December 2016.
|
|
Resolved:
(Moved: Councillors McDonald/Szatow)
A. That the report on the six (6) monthly progress review of the Delivery Program, 2013/2017 and Operational Plan 2016/2017 for the period of July 2016 to December 2016 be received and noted.
B. That 2016/2017 Task P4.1.2.1.1 as listed in the report be noted as remaining on hold for the current year.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY |
37 |
Extinguishment
of Council Easement at 2 - 8 Pymble Avenue and
File: CY00066/9 Vide: GB.9
|
|
To consider a request to extinguish a Council drainage easement in respect of a multi-unit development site at 2‑8 Pymble Avenue and 2-4 Everton Street Pymble. .
|
|
Resolved:
(Moved: Councillors McDonald/Szatow)
A. That approval is granted to extinguish Council’s easement over Lot 2 DP217787.
B. That the Applicant be advised that Council has resolved to extinguish Council’s easement over Lot 2 DP217787.
C. That Council approves of the General Manager or his delegate completing negotiations with the Applicant strictly on the basis set out in this report to secure fair compensation.
D. That Council authorises the Mayor and General Manager to affix the Common Seal of the Council to the instrument for the release of the easement and execute all associated documentation.
E. That all costs associated with the extinguishment of the existing easement including legal and survey costs and all costs associated with new drainage works be borne by the Applicant.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY |
38 |
PCA Smart Cities Conference 2017
File: FY00581/2 Vide: GB.10
|
|
To advise Council of the PCA Smart Cities Conference 2017.
|
|
Resolved:
(Moved: Councillors McDonald/Armstrong)
That any Councillors interested in attending the PCA Smart Cities Conference 2017 advise the General Manager by Thursday 2 March 2017.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY |
39 |
Waste Collection Contract Extension
File: S11343 Vide: C.2
|
|
In accordance with the Local Government Act 1993 and the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005, in the opinion of the General Manager, the following business is of a kind as referred to in section 10A(2)(d)(iii), of the Act, and should be dealt with in a part of the meeting closed to the public.
Section 10A(2)(d) of the Act permits the meeting to be closed to the public for business relating to commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed:
(i) prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it, or (ii) confer a commercial advantage on a competitor of Council, or (iii) reveal a trade secret.
This matter is classified confidential under section 10A(2)(d)(iii) because it deals with a trade secret in respect of
Report by Director Operations dated 17 February 2017
|
|
Resolved:
(Moved: Councillors McDonald/Armstrong)
A. That Council not undertake a tender for the waste and recycling services due to the extenuating circumstances that exist with the State Government’s Local Government Reform process and complying with Section 23A of the Local Government Act.
B. That Council enter into a four (4) year extension to its Waste Collection Contract with Veolia Environmental Services commencing 6 September 2017 as negotiated.
C. That the General Manger be delegated to finalise the negotiations and execute the Deed of Variation with Veolia Environmental Services for a four (4) year extension to its Waste Collection Contract.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY |
Standing Orders
were suspended to deal with items
where there are speakers first after a
Motion moved by Councillors Szatow and Armstrong
was CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
Councillor Fornari-Orsmond withdrew during discussion
Councillor Fornari-Orsmond returned
Councillor Citer withdrew during discussion
Councillor Citer returned
Councillor Malicki withdrew during discussion
Councillor Malicki returned
40 |
Save Marian Street Theatre Committee Business Plan - Probity & Risk Review
File: S10577/2 Vide: GB.1
|
|
To provide Council with the results of an independent probity and risk review of the Save Marian Street Theatre Business Plan.
The following members of the public addressed Council on this item:
M Richardson J Cadden W Blaxland
|
|
Resolved:
(Moved: Councillors Fornari-Orsmond/Ossip)
A. As per the recommendations from the O’Connor Marsden probity and risk review, and prior to Council determining whether to proceed with the Save Marian Street Theatre fundraising initiative, Council should resolve its intention for the future use of the Marian Street Theatre site and theatre facilities in Ku-ring-gai. B. In order to make an informed decision, a business case be prepared assessing the available options for theatre in Ku-ring-gai, including but not limited to those options identified in the O’Connor Marsden report 9 February 2017, and a report be brought to Council on the scope and indicative costs of undertaking the recommended business case.
For the Resolution: The Mayor, Councillor Anderson, Councillors , Citer, McDonald, Pettett, Malicki, Armstrong, Fornari-Orsmond and Ossip
Against the Resolution: Councillors Berlioz and Szatow
The above Resolution was subject to a Foreshadowed
Amendment which was LOST. The Lost Foreshadowed Amendment was: A. That Council resolve to keep the Marian Street Theatre site as the site for the theatre facilities in Ku-ring-gai. B. In order to make an informed decision, a business case be prepared assessing the available options for a theatre at Marian Street.
For the Lost Foreshadowed Amendment: Councillors Citer, Malicki, Armstrong, Berlioz and Szatow
Against the Lost Foreshadowed Amendment: The Mayor, Councillor Anderson, Councillors McDonald, Pettett, Fornari-Orsmond and Ossip
The voting being EQUAL, the Mayor exercised her Casting Vote AGAINST of the Foreshadowed Amendment.
No
decision was taken in respect of the above matter as the
The above Foreshadow Amendment was subject to an Amendment which was LOST. The Lost Amendment was:
A. That Council resolve to keep Marian Street Theatre site as the site for the theatre facilities in Ku-ring-gai. B. That Council proceed according to the recommendations in the O’Connor Marsden Probity and Risk Review. Including that: $36,000 is granted to SMST Committee under the following conditions: · A formal agreement to be set up · Works to be managed by Council (legality p. 70) · Ongoing lease to go to the market (probity p. 70) · Formal agreement (point 2 p. 71) · The funding feasibility analysis to be presented to Council (point 2. p. 72) ·
The role of the committee to be limited to fundraising for
base works ·
Council provide grant funding support for professional
fundraising efforts · Council determines the standard of the refurbishment and restoration of the MST and its ongoing use as an arts cultural facility. · Council determines the design, scope and estimate of the cost of these capital works. It will be up to the committee to negotiate the formal agreement with Council.
For the Amendment: Councillors Citer, Armstrong, Berlioz and Szatow
Against the Amendment: The Mayor, Councillor Anderson, Councillors McDonald, Pettett, Malicki, Fornari-Orsmond and Ossip
No decision was taken in respect of the above matter as the Amendment when put to the vote was LOST
A Motion moved
by Councillors Malicki and Szatow
For the Motion: Councillors Citer, Armstrong, Malicki, Berlioz and Szatow
Against the Motion: The Mayor, Councillor Anderson, Councillors McDonald, Pettett, Fornari-Orsmond and Ossip
The voting being EQUAL, the Mayor exercised her Casting Vote AGAINST of the Motion.
No decision was taken in respect of the above matter as the Motion when put to the vote was LOST
Councillor Fornari-Orsmond moved a Procedural Motion asking the Mayor to seek a vote on the matter as there had been 2 speakers For and 2 Against.
For the Motion: The Mayor, Councillor Anderson, Councillors , Citer, McDonald, Pettett, Malicki, Berlioz, Szatow, Fornari-Orsmond and Ossip
Against the Motion: Councillor Armstrong
|
Councillor Berlioz withdrew during discussion
Councillor Armstrong withdrew during discussion
Councillor Armstrong returned
Councillor Pettett withdrew during discussion
Councillor Szatow withdrew during discussion
Councillor Szatow returned
Councillor Pettett returned
Councillor Berlioz returned
Councillor Szatow departed during discussion
Councillor Ossip withdrew during discussion
Councillor Ossip returned
Motions of which due Notice has been given
41 |
Turramurra Community Hub Masterplan and Rezoning & Reclassification of 1275 Pacific Highway, Turramurra
File: S09969 Vide: NM.1
The following members of the public addressed Council on this item:
S Marshall M Burgess J Kitson C Smallbone J Harwood
|
|
Notice of Rescission from Councillors Malicki, Berlioz, Szatow, Armstrong and Citer dated 15 February 2017
We, the undersigned Councillors, move that the following decision from GB9 of the meeting of 7 February 2017 is rescinded.
A. That Council adopts the Planning Proposal to amend the Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan (Local Centres) 2012 to rezone and reclassify Council owned land at 1275 Pacific Highway, Turramurra.
B. That the Planning Proposal be submitted to the Department of Planning and Environment in accordance with Section 59 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, and the Greater Sydney Commission be requested to make the plan.
C. That those who made submissions be notified of Council’s decision.
D. Council adopt the Turramurra Community Hub Master Plan as described in this report and attached and in summary includes:
i. A Community Building comprising a community centre and branch library located adjoining the proposed town square site with a total area of - minimum 3000sqm; ii. Open space (linear/leisure gardens) – 2780sqm; iii. Town square – 2300sqm; iv. Residential – 18,600sqm; v. Retail – 6,360sqm; and vi. Streetscape improvements – Forbes Lane, Ray Street and William Street.
E. That Section B, Part 14 1B – Turramurra Centre of Ku-ring-gai Local Centres Development Control Plan be amended to be consistent with the Council’s adopted Masterplan.
F. That the draft amendment to the Ku-ring-gai Local Centres Development Control Plan be placed on public exhibition in accordance with the requirements of the EP&A Act 1979 and Regulations.
G. That a report be brought back to Council after the exhibition.
H. That Council proceed to the next phase of the Turramurra Community Hub project which involves the preparation of a business case and investigation of preferred delivery method.
If the Rescission Motion is successful, then we move:
A. That 1275 Pacific Highway, Turramurra, be retained as a public park, zoned RE1 and classified Community.
B. That those who made submissions and the Greater Sydney Commission be informed of Council’s decision.
C. That a report be brought back to Council adjusting the Turramurra Community Hub Masterplan to exclude any development on or under the Turramurra Village Park. This Masterplan should include: i. A Community Building comprising a Community Centre and Branch Library located adjoining to the Town Square site with a total area of a minimum of 3,000sqm ii. Open space (linear/leisure gardens) up to 2780sqm iii. Town square – 2300sqm iv. Residential – 18,600sqm v. Retail – 6,360sqm vi. Streetscape improvements – Forbes Lane, Ray Street and William Street
D. That Section B, Part 14 1B – Turramurra Centre of Ku-ring-gai Local Centres Development Control Plan be amended if necessary to be consistent with the Council’s adopted Masterplan.
E. That the Draft Amendment showing retention of the park as open space be placed on exhibition if necessary in accordance with the requirements of the EP&A Act 1979 and Regulations.
F. That a report be brought back to Council after the exhibition if the exhibition is necessary.
G. That a briefing be held I the evening at a time which suits most Councillors to discuss financial implications of the masterplan, and funding options which do NOT include loss of the Village Park. This is to be within one month.
H. That Council proceed to the next phase of the Turramurra Community Hub project which involved the preparation of a business case and investigation of the preferred delivery method.
I. That design work for embellishing the Turramurra Village Park commence immediately with design costs being funded from the s94 Contributions already collected to embellish this park under the Contributions Plan 2010. This amount is in the vicinity of $321,000 in 2010.
|
|
Resolved:
(Moved: Councillors Malicki/Citer)
That the above Notice of Rescission as printed be adopted.
For the Resolution: Councillors Citer, Malicki, Armstrong and Berlioz
Against the Resolution: The Mayor, Councillor Anderson, Councillors McDonald, Pettett, Fornari-Orsmond and Ossip
No decision was taken in respect of the above matter as the Motion when put to the vote was LOST
|
42 |
Turramurra Community Hub - Draft Memorandum of Understanding
File: S10467 Vide: GB.7
|
|
To seek the approval of Council to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Coles Group Property Developments (Coles) to allow discussions regarding a preferred delivery method for the Turramurra Community Hub Project.
|
|
Resolved:
(Moved: Councillors McDonald/Fornari-Orsmond)
A. To seek an in principle agreement from Council to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Coles Group Property Developments for the Turramurra Community Hub Project.
B. That Council authorise the General Manager and/or his delegate to make minor amendments to the MOU to reflect any comments made by Coles, execute the legal document, to affix the Council Seal and to execute all necessary documentation, resulting from the development of the final MOU.
For the Resolution: The Mayor, Councillor Anderson, Councillors , McDonald, Pettett, Fornari-Orsmond, Berlioz and Ossip
Against the Resolution: Councillors Citer, Malicki and Armstrong
|
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
43 |
Plastics - Taking a Lead at Local Level
File: S02295 Vide: QN.1
|
|
Question Without Notice from Councillor Duncan McDonald
|
|
One of the speakers this evening spoke about plastic and taking a lead at a local level.
Would the General Manager please advise if there is a way we can action something along these lines as there were some very good points raised.
Answered by General Manager and Mayor
The General Manager advised that he will organise a memo through the Director Strategy & Environment.
The Mayor advised that staff are organising a meeting with Mr Chris Smallbone and any Councillors wishing to attend will be welcome.
|
44 |
Update on Boundary Road QWN
File: 88/05172/01 Vide: QN.2
|
|
Question Without Notice from Councillor David Armstrong
|
|
Can staff provide an update on the Question without Notice from 7 February 2017?
Answered by Director Operations
The Director Operations advised a memo has been sent to all Councillors.
|
Council resolved
itself into Closed Meeting
with the Press and Public Excluded to deal with the following item
after a Motion moved by Councillors Fornari-Orsmond and Ossip,
was CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
45 |
Lindfield Community Hub - Public Private Partnership - initial assessment of Project Proposal by the Office of Local Government
File: S10973-6 Vide: C.1
|
|
In accordance with the Local Government Act 1993 and the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005, in the opinion of the General Manager, the following business is of a kind as referred to in section 10A(2)(d)(ii), of the Act, and should be dealt with in a part of the meeting closed to the public.
Section 10A(2)(d) of the Act permits the meeting to be closed to the public for business relating to commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed:
(i) prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it, or (ii) confer a commercial advantage on a competitor of Council, or (iii) reveal a trade secret.
This matter is classified confidential under section 10A(2)(d)(ii) because it would confer a commercial advantage on a competitor of the Council.
Report by Director Strategy & Environment dated 19 January 2017
|
|
Resolved:
(Moved: Councillors Anderson/Armstrong)
That Council adopts the recommendations A and B as set out in the Officers Report.
For the Resolution: The Mayor, Councillor Anderson, Councillors , Citer, McDonald, Pettett, Armstrong, Berlioz, Fornari-Orsmond and Ossip
Against the Resolution: Councillor Malicki
|
Council resolved
to return to Open Council
after a Motion moved by Councillors McDonald and Fornari-Orsmond
was CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
The General Manager adverted to the consideration of the matter referred to in the Minute numbered 43, and to the resolution contained in such Minute, and noted that Councillor Szatow was absent during voting.
The Meeting closed at 11.44 pm
The Minutes of the Ordinary Meeting of Council held on 28 February 2017 (Pages 1 - 59) were confirmed as a full and accurate record of proceedings on 14 March 2017.
__________________________ __________________________
General Manager Mayor / Chairperson
Ordinary Meeting of Council - 14 March 2017 |
PT.1 / 58 |
|
|
Item PT.1 |
S09969 |
|
1 March 2017 |
Petition
Save Turramurra Village Park
“We, the undersigned, (Four Hundred and Sixty Eight (468) Signatures].
1. Demand Turramurra Village Park remain as publicly owned open space.
2. Oppose the rezoning of the Turramurra Village Park for high-rise development.
3. Call for the full and proper protection of the heritage and environmental values of this park.
4. Denounce the undemocratic precedent of a council ignoring a Public Hearing recommendation.”
That the petition be received and referred to the appropriate Officer of Council for attention.
|
Ordinary Meeting of Council - 14 March 2017 |
GB.1 / 59 |
|
|
Item GB.1 |
S09436 |
|
17 November 2016 |
Business Engagement Update
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Purpose of Report
To provide Council with an update on the business engagement program delivered in the past 12 months.
Background
Council has been delivering business engagement events since 2014. These events formed an important part of Council’s commitment to local economic develop which was overseen by Council’s Economic and Social Development Advisory Committee (ESDAC). In late 2015, ESDAC was disbanded and shortly after, in early 2016, Council became a member the State Government’s Small Business Friendly Councils program.
In response to this change Council’s program of business engagement was enhanced to deliver a wider range of events to provide support to businesses in their day to day operations and longer term strategic planning activities.
The events program was developed to deliver four types of events:
1) Business Forums – medium to large events (50 – 100 attendees), designed to improve communications between the business community and Council, and play a key part in council’s commitment to business engagement as part of its membership of the Small Business Friendly Council’s program.
2) Businesses Seminars – medium sized events (40 – 80 attendees) providing educational and networking opportunities for local businesses. It also aims to support micro and small businesses that often lack the time and resources to upskill and/or meet with groups of business peers.
3) Small Business Roundtable – small events (10 – 20 attendees) designed to assist businesses get together, connect and learn, collaboratively tackling business challenges and identifying opportunities for growth and innovation.
4) Business Training Workshops – training room scale (10 – 20 attendees) designed to provide rich learning experiences for local businesses. Sessions are free and usually held as a half-day workshop with attendees provided with practical knowledge to apply to their businesses.
Comments
In the period November 2015 to November 2016, Council delivered 13 business events ranging from large forums to small roundtable sessions. Nearly 500 local business people attended the events delivered at venues across the Ku-ring-gai local government area. A wide range of industry sectors were represented at events, revealing the wide variety of businesses operating in the LGA. The events covered a broad range of topics including marketing, cash flow, business planning, innovation and IT.
Feedback regarding these events has consistently been very high, with attendees commending council on the quality of speakers, venues and event outputs. This report provides more information about what’s been delivered in the period November 2015 and November 2016, feedback received from those involved and how the local business community will be engaged in the coming 12 months and beyond.
Events delivered November 2015- November 2016
Council delivered 13 events from November 15 to November 16. These included four seminars, two training sessions, five small Business Roundtable sessions and two business forums. The events were facilitated by Council staff and included presentations from a range of industry experts.
Event speakers/facilitators
A selection of speakers from Ku-ring-gai Council business events November 2015 – November 2016 (from top left: Heather Porter - Autopilot Your Business, Brian Dorricott – Meteorical, Jeremy Carter - Rapport Leadership Australia, Bill Soper – Astroacc, James Sneddon – BizPartner, Peter Moriarty – ITGenius Australia, Dr Cathy Foley - CSIRO Manufacturing, Paul Fletcher MP – Minister for Urban Infrastructure, Adrienne Maclean – The Speakers Practice , Meyer Mussry – Savant Corporation, Chris Russell – Broadcaster and Agricultural Scientist, Michael Griffiths - Referral Marketing Guru.
The events were attended by 481 participants in total, who represented a range of industry sectors including:
· Business and Management consulting |
· Interior design |
· Hospitality |
· Web design/IT |
· Real estate/property development |
· Marketing |
· Wellness and healthcare |
· Graphic design/photography |
· Office suppliers |
· Aged car |
· Retail |
· Education |
· HR/Recruitment |
· Science/manufacturing |
Below is a summary of each event:
Table 1 - Summary of Events Delivered
Event Format and title |
Date |
Keynote Speaker (s) |
Attendees |
Location |
Business Breakfast Seminar – How to Shine Online |
12 Nov ‘15 |
Robert Gerrish, Flying Solo |
60 |
Greengate Hotel Killara |
Business Breakfast Seminar– Cloud Computing |
11 Feb ‘16 |
Peter Moriarty – ITGenius Australia |
45 |
Roseville Golf Club |
Business Forum – Let’s Futureproof our Local Economy |
31 Mar ‘16 |
Paul Fletcher MP, Dr Kathy Foley (CSIRO), Brian Dorricott (Meteorical) |
95 |
CSIRO, Lindfield |
Small Business Roundtable - No/Low cost Marketing |
26 Apr ‘16 |
Adrienne Maclean – The Speakers Practice |
14 |
Bistro de Philippe, Gordon |
Business Breakfast Seminar - Innovating in your business? Here's how... |
12 May ‘16 |
Brian Dorricott – Meteorical |
47 |
Roseville Golf Club |
Small Business Roundtable - Managing Cashflow in Small Business |
31 May ‘16 |
Bill Soper - Astroacc |
13 |
Kiplings Garage Bar, Turramurra |
Business Training – Ready Set Grow! Helping local business access the Industry Skills Fund (ISF) |
8 Jun ‘16 |
Jeremy Carter -Rapport Leadership Australia |
15 |
Ante Room, Council Chambers |
Small Business Roundtable – Small Business Growth Strategies |
26 Jul ‘16 |
James Sneddon – BizPartner |
12 |
Bistro de Philippe, Gordon |
Small Business Roundtable – Lessons in Social Media |
23 Aug ‘16 |
Olivier Tilley, Piper and Ross |
16 |
Piper and Ross, Pymble |
Business Seminar - Four Steps to Social Media Marketing Success |
1 Sep ‘16 |
Heather Porter, Autopilot your Business |
89 |
Pymble Golf Club |
Training workshop – Business Planning Workshop |
21 Sep ‘16 |
Meyer Mussry, Savant Corporation |
14 |
Gordon Library |
Small Business Roundtable - Brainstorm Session |
1 Nov ‘16 |
Matt Lye, Sydney Business |
15 |
Gordon Library |
Business Forum - Business Collaboration Means Collective Power |
17 Nov ‘16 |
Dr Chris Russell and Michael Griffiths (Referral Marketing Guru) |
46 |
Killara Golf Club |
Event Feedback
Feedback was collected via form at the end of the events. Attendees were very positive and where asked rated the events overall a minimum nine out of ten. This rating related to a number of aspects from quality of speakers to event organisation.
Speakers were rated highly as were venues and organisation. Lower scores were provided for overall relevance of content for some businesses, the time of day the event was held and time allocated during the events.
Events attendees were invited to provide comments. Here is a selection:
· ‘The event was excellent. I really enjoyed it and made some great contacts’ |
· ‘I'm new to the area but am very impressed – thanks!’ |
· ‘The 1 minute business pitches were really good!’ |
· ‘The crowd sourcing problem solving is fabulous’ |
· ‘As a small business owner, I feel well supported. It's very much appreciated, thank you.’ |
· ‘Fantastic speaker, it’s so good have such an instructive presentation – I look forward to applying what I learnt’ |
· ‘Council is very proactive for small businesses |
· ‘Great idea, well presented, good location and great subject.’ |
· ‘Great to hear about new technology’‘ |
· ‘You do a wonderful job, love your work!’ |
· ‘Council is doing a great job in building a support network for local businesses’ |
· ‘'It underlined the importance and power of businesses working together’ |
· ‘It was great networking at my table’ |
· ‘Truly wonderful event, thanks!’ |
· ‘Great event – really interesting’ |
· ‘Doing great, keep it up. Love your functions’ |
Other feedback and suggestions
Council staff also sought feedback engagement program participant’s to help ensure the needs of Ku-ring-gai local businesses are being met. As well as ongoing discussions between council staff and local business groups and businesses, feedback was also collected more formally in 3 ways.
1) In the workshop sessions at the business forums
2) Via event feedback forms
3) Via a survey conducted in December 2016 to January 2017
Businesses provided a large volume of feedback across a range of topics. Common themes and ideas appeared throughout.
The table below outlines these themes and ideas and the actions council staff will aim to undertake in the coming months.
Table 2 – Summary of feedback and resulting actions
Issues raised |
Actions |
Delivery of events · Workshops · Training sessions · Facilitate business learning and learning/education · Provide networking opportunities – structured and open forum
|
· Continue to deliver the business engagement events program with a range of formats, timing, subject matter to appeal to a wide range of needs (as currently) · Focus to increase the diversity of attendees by more widely promoting the events · Maintain active conversations with businesses and business group to ensure themes and format of events are meeting needs · Identify and pursue opportunities to work more closely with business groups do deliver events and workshops |
Facilitate better communications between council and business · Connect and support local business chamber · Connect and facilitate connections online (website and social media) · Have a skills matrix of local businesses · Lead generation – connecting local businesses (include skills matrix) · Continue consulting with business on council projects · Council promoting all business events · Virtual networking/hubs · Create community groups/networks e.g. page on council’s website for members |
· Continue to actively connect with chambers of commerce promoting their activities as appropriate · Continue delivering business forums, incorporating workshop elements as previously · Enhance online content (and functionality) to ensure business can interact more effectively with council · Ensure the ongoing delivery of the Business E-news · Continue to ensure businesses are actively considered when developing engagement and communications strategies within project plans · Investigate possibility of business details and local skills being shared online |
Support better communications/collaboration between businesses · Create community groups/networks e.g. page on council’s website for members · Council promoting all local business events · Virtual networking/hubs · Create community groups/networks e.g. page on council’s website for members
|
· Continue to deliver business engagement events (see above) · Where possible share details of participants in the business engagement program · Enhance web content and functionality to allow business to connect online · Investigate options to create a virtual hub for local businesses to connect · Actively promote relevant business events run by council and other business groups via website and e-newsletters · Pilot workshops for small neighbourhood retailers to work more collaboratively |
Inform local businesses about public and private support · Information about grants and how to apply · Support programs offered to businesses · Funding opportunities – sources of funds, e.g. Angel investors, venture capital etc. |
· Enhance connections and liaison with NSW Business Connect program and promote to local businesses · Publicise new and existing government initiatives, grants and support programs |
Encourage innovation and entrepreneurship in local community · Help get business ideas off the ground · Connect local people to those who can support and structure good ideas
|
· Maintain and enhance Council’s relationship with CSIRO Lindfield and connect local business with their recently established innovation hub · Deliver innovation/entrepreneurship focused events and promote related third party events · Connect local businesses and entrepreneurs with the State Government Business Connect program and other relevant programs |
Local accommodation and facilities for business · Consider creating space for businesses – e.g. start-up hub, co-working spaces, meeting facilities, subsided office space · Make underused existing council facilities more business friendly – provide hot desks · Better publicise existing meeting spaces for business use |
· There is currently minimal scope within Council’s property portfolio to accommodate the needs of local businesses. As such, Council will give consideration to development accommodation and facilities to meet local business needs in its urban renewal and transformation projects (e.g. activate Lindfield/Gordon etc). · Information will be provided to business via the website and business e-news about available room hire. |
Council Services and Policies · Partner/purchase with local business · Respond to business request swiftly · Explain compliance issues (signage, parking, development etc.) which impact local business and provide support. |
· Continue to investigate opportunities to enhance provision of local goods and services · Acknowledge the needs of business related requests and accommodate these where possible within the constraints of Council’s current legislative and policy framework. · Provide information to the local business community about Council’s compliance activities and policies via website, e-news and/or events. |
Conclusion
Council business engagement events have been well received by the local business community. Strong relationships are being forged with businesses, business groups and other government agencies with an aim to assist local business to access high quality support, be given the change to more closely engage and collaborate, and to assist Council to adapt its services to be more effective at supporting the local economy.
Council is not in the business of doing business. However, it is in a strong position to facilitate local business success, particularly for those companies with limited resources for strategic planning, training, development and collaborative working. It is hoped that by pursuing the actions developed in this report, in response to feedback from our business community, Council can continue to effectively support its local economy.
integrated planning and reporting
Local Economy and Employment
Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective |
Delivery Program Term Achievement |
Operational Plan Task |
E1.1.1 Ku-ring-gai’s opportunities and assets are promoted to strengthen and attract business and employment to the area.
|
Research opportunities to strengthen and attract business to Ku-ring-gai. |
Continue to identify opportunities to promote and strengthen local economy and employment growth in liaison with the Office of the NSW Small Business Commissioner, NSW Business Chamber, local Chambers of Commerce and surrounding councils. |
Develop a strategic program in collaboration with economic partners, to promote Ku-ring-gai as a place to invest in business and employment generating activities.
|
Continue to engage local businesses in revitalisation projects in Lindfield and Turramurra Local Centres to ensure business/ economic and employment needs inform decision-making.
|
|
Build partnerships with business and stakeholders to promote business opportunities. |
Continue targeted engagement of business groups and bodies actively promoting Ku-ring-gai business opportunities and activities as well as providing access to relevant local and regional information that may assist local businesses. |
|
E1.1.2 Key stakeholders have confidence in, and pro-actively partner with Council to enhance employment and economic benefits. |
Engage businesses in the centres to provide input into improvement plans. |
Ensure relevant Business Chambers and local businesses are aware and able to contribute to the local centre upgrade programs. |
Actively engage with businesses in local centres to ensure their needs are accommodated in local centre upgrades. |
||
Pursue opportunities for events at local places and spaces to strengthen the local economy. |
Facilitate existing and new events by business and community organisations through guidelines, sponsorship and other mechanisms. |
|
E2.1.1 Ku-ring-gai’s business community, government agencies and regional partners are working in an effective and integrated way to strengthen and develop Ku-ring-gai’s local economic base. |
Work with economic partners to develop common strategic economic employment objectives for Ku-ring-gai. |
Continue to engage with local Chambers of Commerce and the business community, including holding business forums and small business discussion sessions, to identify and implement economic development priorities and actions, discuss relevant issues and promote collaboration between business and Council. |
Create and deliver e-newsletters to local business subscribers about issues of interest to the local business community. |
||
Participate in and initiate regional programs that will broaden economic employment opportunities for Ku-ring-gai residents. |
Actively engage with local and regional business stakeholders including Chambers of Commerce (Ku-ring-gai, Hornsby, Ryde, Warringah, Chatswood), NSW Business Chamber and Office of the NSW Small Business Commissioner, and Economic Development Australia’s training and events programs to broaden economic employment opportunities for Ku-ring-gai residents. |
Governance Matters
Council resolved, on 15 December 2015, to dissolve the Economic and Social Development Advisory Committee and to endorse Council’s membership of the State Government’s Small Business Friendly Councils Program.
Additionally Local economy and employment is a theme within Council’s Community Strategic Plan.
Risk Management
As a member of the state government’s Small Business Friendly Councils Program, adherence to the associated charter must be complied with.
Financial Considerations
Business engagement is funded within the current budget.
Social Considerations
There are significant social benefits and outcomes of delivering a business engagement program. New events, markets and social capital will increase usage of our local centres and community assets, connecting our community with local businesses and improving the economic and social viability of our local places and spaces.
Environmental Considerations
There are no environmental considerations associated with this report.
Community Consultation
No community consultation is required for this report. However its content is in part informed by feedback received by our local business community.
Internal Consultation
No internal consultation is required for this report.
Summary
This report provides information for Council about the Business Engagement Events program including what has been delivered, feedback received and plans for future engagement of local businesses.
That Council receive and note this report.
|
William Adames Community & Business Engagement Co-ordinator |
Virginia Leafe Manager Corporate Communications |
Janice Bevan Director Community |
|
Ordinary Meeting of Council - 14 March 2017 |
GB.2 / 70 |
|
|
Item GB.2 |
S02133 |
|
6 March 2017 |
2017 National General Assembly of Local Government - Call for Motions
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
purpose of report: |
To inform Councillors of an invitation from the Australian Local Government Association (ALGA) to submit motions to the 2017 National General Assembly (NGA) of Local Government. |
|
|
background: |
The National General Assembly of Local Government (NGA) is held annually and provides an opportunity for councils to identify and discuss national issues of priority for the sector and to agree on possible steps which could be taken to address these issues. The NGA typically attracts more than 700 mayors, councillors and senior officers from councils across Australia. The 2017 NGA will be held at the National Convention Centre in Canberra from 18 - 21 June 2017. |
|
|
comments: |
The ALGA has written to all councils inviting submissions of motions for the 2017 National General Assembly of Local Government (NGA). The theme for the 2017 NGA is ‘Building Tomorrow’s Communities’. Motions must be consistent with this theme. Motions must be submitted to the ALGA by 21 April 2017. |
|
|
recommendation: |
That Councillors provide any proposed motions for the 2017 National General Assembly of Local Government to the Manager Records & Governance by Thursday 23 March 2017, and that a further report providing details of any proposed motions be referred to Council at its meeting on 4 April 2017 for approval prior to submission to the ALGA. |
Purpose of Report
To inform Councillors of an invitation from the Australian Local Government Association (ALGA) to submit motions to the 2017 National General Assembly (NGA) of Local Government.
Background
The National General Assembly of Local Government (NGA) is held annually and provides an opportunity for councils to identify and discuss national issues of priority for the sector and to agree on possible steps which could be taken to address these issues.
The NGA typically attracts more than 700 mayors, councillors and senior officers from councils across Australia. The 2017 NGA will be held at the National Convention Centre in Canberra from 18 - 21 June 2017.
Comments
The ALGA has written to all councils inviting submissions of motions for the 2017 National General Assembly of Local Government (NGA) (Attachment A1).
The theme for the 2017 NGA is ‘Building Tomorrow’s Communities’. Motions must be consistent with this theme.
To be eligible for inclusion in the NGA Business Papers, and subsequent debate on the floor of the NGA, motions must meet the following criteria:
· Be relevant to the work of local government nationally;
· Be consistent with the theme of the NGA;
· Complement or build on the policy objectives of your state and territory local government association;
· Propose a clear action and outcome, and
· Not be advanced on behalf of external third parties which may seek to use the NGA to apply pressure to Board members, to gain national political exposure for positions that are not directly relevant to the work of, or in the national interests of the local government sector.
A Discussion Paper (Attachment A2) has been prepared by the ALGA to assist Councils in preparing motions.
Motions must be submitted online to the ALGA by 21 April 2017. Once submitted, motions will be reviewed by the ALGA Board’s NGA Sub-Committee and by state and territory local government associations to determine eligibility for inclusion in the NGA Business Papers.
Motions that are agreed to at the NGA become Resolutions of the NGA. These Resolutions are then considered by the ALGA Board when setting national local government policy, when the Board is making representations to the Federal Government at Ministerial Councils, during meetings and in ALGA publications. The ALGA Board is not bound by any Resolution passed at the NGA.
This report recommends that any Councillors wishing to submit a motion provide details of the motion to the Manager Records & Governance by Thursday 23 March 2017. A further report will be provided to Council at its meeting on 4 April 2017 to consider all proposed motions and approve them for submission to the ALGA.
A separate report will be provided to Council at its meeting on 28 March 2017 requesting nominations for delegates to attend the NGA.
integrated planning and reporting
Leadership and Governance
Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective |
Delivery Program Term Achievement |
Operational Plan Task |
Council leads the community by advocating, influencing and participating in policy development to the benefit of the local area |
Council actively engages with stakeholders to inform the development of Council’s strategies and plans as appropriate |
Pursue opportunities to contribute to policy development affecting Ku-ring-gai at state and regional levels
|
Governance Matters
Nil.
Risk Management
Nil.
Financial Considerations
Nil.
Social Considerations
Nil.
Environmental Considerations
Nil.
Community Consultation
Nil.
Internal Consultation
Nil.
Summary
The ALGA has written to all councils inviting submissions of motions for the 2017 National General Assembly of Local Government (NGA).
The theme for the 2017 NGA is ‘Building Tomorrow’s Communities’. Motions must be consistent with this theme.
Motions must be submitted online to the ALGA by 21 April 2017. This report recommends that any Councillors wishing to submit a motion provide the relevant details to the Manager Records & Governance by Thursday 23 March 2017. A further report will be provided to Council at its meeting on 4 April 2017 to consider all proposed motions and approve them for submission to the ALGA.
A. That Councillors provide any proposed motions for the 2017 National General Assembly of Local Government to the Manager Records & Governance by Thursday 23 March 2017; and
B. That a further report be provided to Council at its meeting on 4 April 2017, requesting that Council consider all proposed motions and approve them for submission to the ALGA.
|
Amber Moloney Manager Records and Governance |
David Marshall Director Corporate |
Invitation to Councils - Call for Motions - National General Assembly 2017 |
|
2017/057675 |
||
|
Discussion Paper - Call for Motions - National General Assembly 2017 |
|
2017/057677 |
APPENDIX No: 1 - Invitation to Councils - Call for Motions - National General Assembly 2017 |
|
Item No: GB.2 |
Ordinary Meeting of Council - 14 March 2017 |
GB.3 / 84 |
|
|
Item GB.3 |
CY00043/9 |
|
6 March 2017 |
2017 Ecocity World Summit
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
purpose of report: |
To advise Council of the 2017 ECOCITY World Summit. |
|
|
background: |
The ECOCITY Summit series, held every two years since 1990, has developed into one of the most globally significant forums for addressing the complex challenges facing humanity in a rapidly urbanising world. |
|
|
comments: |
The 2017 ECOCITY World Summit will be held on 12-14 July 2017 at the Melbourne Exhibition and Convention Centre. ECOCITY 2017 will address the unprecedented ecological, economic, political and cultural challenges – and opportunities – facing the world’s cities through a focus on six major themes: · Climate and energy transformations · Food and water security · Smart cities for people · Healthy and caring cities · Culturally vibrant cities · Governance, infrastructure and finance |
|
|
recommendation: |
That any Councillors interested in attending the 2017 ECOCITY World Summit advise the General Manager by Tuesday 28 March 2017. |
Purpose of Report
To advise Council of the 2017 ECOCITY World Summit.
Background
The ECOCITY Summit series, held every two years since 1990, has developed into one of the most globally significant forums for addressing the complex challenges facing humanity in a rapidly urbanising world.
Comments
The 2017 ECOCITY World Summit will be held on 12-14 July 2017 at the Melbourne Exhibition and Convention Centre.
ECOCITY 2017 will address the unprecedented ecological, economic, political and cultural challenges – and opportunities – facing the world’s cities through a focus on six major themes:
· Climate and energy transformations
· Food and water security
· Smart cities for people
· Healthy and caring cities
· Culturally vibrant cities
· Governance, infrastructure and finance
The Summit program will address three core questions in relation to each of these themes.
· Understanding: What are the key sustainability and resilience risks and opportunities facing cities? What are the key sources and drivers of these risks and opportunities?
· Imagining: How can we imagine and communicate sustainable and resilient city futures and pathways?
· Creating: What actions are required to drive the rapid and just transitions required to create resilient and sustainable cities?
The program for the Summit is attached (Attachment A1).
integrated planning and reporting
Leadership and Governance
Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective |
Delivery Program Term Achievement |
Operational Plan Task |
Council leads the community by advocating, influencing and participating in policy development to the benefit of the local area
|
Council actively engages with stakeholders to inform the development of Council’s strategies and plans as appropriate
|
Pursue opportunities to contribute to policy development affecting Ku-ring-gai at state and regional levels
|
Governance Matters
The Payment of Expenses and Provision of Facilities to Councillors Policy provides for Council to meet the reasonable costs of Councillors attending conferences authorised by resolution of Council.
Risk Management
Nil.
Financial Considerations
Conference registration is $860 per person for early bird registration (available until 31 March 2017) or $1,120 per person for standard registration (for bookings made after 31 March 2017).
This does not include any associated travel costs.
Attendance is provided for in the Councillor’s conference budget in accordance with the Payment of Expenses and Provision of Facilities Policy. Council has an annual budget of $30,700 for Councillors’ attendance at conferences with $25,973 remaining in the 2016/2017 financial year.
Social Considerations
Nil.
Environmental Considerations
Nil.
Community Consultation
Nil.
Internal Consultation
Nil.
Summary
The 2017 ECOCITY World Summit will be held on 12-14 July 2017 at the Melbourne Exhibition and Convention Centre.
ECOCITY 2017 will address the unprecedented ecological, economic, political and cultural challenges – and opportunities – facing the world’s cities through a focus on six major themes:
· Climate and energy transformations
· Food and water security
· Smart cities for people
· Healthy and caring cities
· Culturally vibrant cities
· Governance, infrastructure and finance
The program for the Summit is attached (Attachment A1).
That any Councillors interested in attending the 2017 ECOCITY World Summit advise the General Manager by Tuesday 28 March 2017.
|
Amber Moloney Manager Records and Governance |
David Marshall Director Corporate |
ECOCITY World Summit 2017 - Program |
|
2017/057766 |
Ordinary Meeting of Council - 14 March 2017 |
GB.4 / 90 |
|
|
Item GB.4 |
S02613 |
|
1 February 2017 |
Companion Animals Management Plan 2017-2020
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
purpose of report: |
To present to Council the draft Ku-ring-gai Companion Animals Plan for the period 2017 to 2020. |
|
|
background: |
In accordance with NSW state guidelines, councils were encouraged to develop individual plans as a guide to Management & Service delivery for Companion Animal matters within their locality. This is the third plan developed in the series. Council’s inaugural plan was adopted in 2006, for the period 2006 – 2011, the second was for the period 2011 – 2016. The current plan sets out intended actions for the period 2017-2020. |
|
|
comments: |
The draft Companion Animals Management Plan 2017 to 2020 is considered to be in an acceptable form to place on public exhibition. The draft plan follows the format and activity areas of the inaugural plan. |
|
|
recommendation: |
That the draft Ku-ring-gai Companion Animals Plan 2017
to 2020 be placed on public exhibition for a period of |
Purpose of Report
To present to Council the draft Ku-ring-gai Companion Animals Plan for the period 2017 to 2020.
Background
The Companion Animals Management Plan was developed in response to a recommendation from the NSW Department of Local Government that Council’s develop management plans to facilitate the administration of the requirements of the NSW Companion Animals Act 1998. Ku-ring-gai’s first Plan was adopted in March 2006 and was a five year plan that was subject to annual review. The draft plan 2017 to 2020 is the third such plan.
The three main areas that the Plan targets are:
· Service and facilities
· Education
· Compliance
Comments
The draft Companion Animals Management Plan 2017 to 2020 is considered to be in an acceptable form to place on public exhibition. The draft plan 2017 to 2020 generally follows the format and activity areas of the inaugural plan, building upon existing programs. No new services are proposed. It is recommended that the following be undertaken:
1. The draft Companion Animals Management Plan be placed on public exhibition for a period of 28 days.
2. Whilst on exhibition, members of the public be invited to make written submissions regarding the content of the plan.
3. After the period of public exhibition, any submissions received be considered. If deemed appropriate, amendments be made to the plan incorporating suggestions from the public submissions.
4. The final document be presented to Council for adoption.
integrated planning and reporting
Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective |
Delivery Program Term Achievement |
Operational Plan Task |
C5.1 A community where residents feel safe and enjoy good health. |
Companion Animals Management Plan is adopted and implemented |
Implement adopted Plan and undertake annual review. |
Governance Matters
Local Government (general) Regulation 2005 - Reg 217(f) requires a detailed annual statement, prepared in accordance with guidelines as issued by the Director-General from time to time. A statement of Council’s activities during the year in relation to enforcing and ensuring compliance with the Companion Animals Act 1998 and Regulation under that Act must be included in Council’s Annual Report.
Risk Management
Council manages risks by the identification, assessment and the implementation of control measures of reasonably foreseeable hazards and risk within its Enterprise Risk Management Program. The adoption of this plan would assist and ensure that risk management decisions are based on a considered approach and that assessments are conducted in a consistent manner that eliminates or reduces its risk exposure in regard to Companion Animal matters.
Financial Considerations
There are no specific financial implications associated with the development and placement of the draft plan on public exhibition. The annual budget provided for this cost centre is adequate to service the plan. Private sponsorship is generally sought to assist with community education programs such as Dogs Day Out.
Funds for the maintenance and up-grading of off-leash areas have been included within the Operations department budget.
Social Considerations
Ku-ring-gai residents and their Companion Animals are regarded as one of the most interactive communities in Australia. This plan provides a robust guideline to ensure responsible pet ownership and service delivery on a local level.
Environmental Considerations
There are no specific environmental considerations associated with this report. The Companion Animal Management Plan includes a specific action to manage bushland and environmental protection areas.
Community Consultation
No prior Community Consultation has occurred in the development of this plan. However, the draft Ku-ring-gai Companion Animals Management Plan 2017-2020 is intended be placed on public exhibition for a period of 28 days. Following the exhibition, a review of submissions will be made and the plan will be referred back to Council for determination.
Internal Consultation
The Plan was drafted in consultation with staff from Strategy and Environment and Operations departments and Council’s Rangers group.
Summary
The Companion Animals Management Plan represents Council's continued commitment to provide services to all sectors of the community. It lays the framework for activities in relation to companion animal management. It assists in the preparation of annual work plans and associated budgets.
That the draft Ku-ring-gai Companion Animals Management Plan 2017 to 2020 be placed on public exhibition for a period of 28 days and then reported back to Council.
|
Tony McCormack Team Leader Rangers Services |
Anne Seaton Manager Regulation & Compliance |
Michael Miocic Director Development & Regulation |
|
Draft Companion Animals Management Plan 2017-2020 |
|
2017/058242 |
Ordinary Meeting of Council - 14 March 2017 |
GB.5 / 106 |
|
|
Item GB.5 |
S08622/4 |
|
1 February 2017 |
Draft Voluntary Planning Agreement - Part Moree to Dumaresq Road Link Gordon - Exhibition
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
purpose of report: |
To provide an update on the progress towards delivering a road link between Moree Street and Dumaresq Street Gordon in accordance with the Development Control Plan and the Public Domain Plan and to present a draft Planning Agreement to Council with the recommendation that it be placed on statutory public exhibition. |
|
|
background: |
The Local Centres Development Control Plan and Public Domain Plan make provision for link roads through the long blocks between the Pacific Highway and Vale Street Gordon. These are a key component of the Council-RMS strategy to facilitate traffic & pedestrian circulation and management for the redevelopment of the local centre of Gordon. |
|
|
comments: |
Ku-ring-gai Council delivered Beans Farm Road between McIntyre Street and Dumaresq Street in 2014/15. Preparations for the delivery of the link between Dumaresq Street and Moree Street are well advanced with one executed Planning Agreement and one draft Planning Agreement. |
|
|
recommendation: |
That the draft Planning Agreement for the partial delivery of a link-road adjoining 29-31 Moree Street Gordon be placed on statutory public exhibition. |
Purpose of Report
To provide an update on the progress towards delivering a road link between Moree Street and Dumaresq Street Gordon in accordance with the Development Control Plan and the Public Domain Plan and to present a draft Planning Agreement to Council with the recommendation that it be placed on statutory public exhibition.
Background
Ku-ring-gai Council has been engaged in strategic planning for the delivery of new development and supporting infrastructure in the Local Government Area for many years. Extensive planning from 2006 onwards first culminated in the Town Centres Local Environmental Plan adopted by the Ku-ring-gai Planning Panel in 2010. The Council-determined Local Centres Local Environmental Plan (LEP) followed in 2012 and remains current.
Supporting strategic planning documents include the Ku-ring-gai Local Centres Development Control Plan (DCP), the Ku-ring-gai Public Domain Plan (PDP), and the Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 (CP). Supporting studies informing the development of the overarching strategy included the Open Space Acquisition Strategy, the Community Facilities Strategy, and Traffic Studies for each main centre.
Strategic traffic management analysis was undertaken for each Local Centre by Arup or by GTA; the latter was the consultant for the Gordon Town Centre. Discussions between Roads and Maritime Services (RMS) and Ku-ring-gai Council informed a strategy for Gordon which included the delivery of link roads to break up the larger lineal blocks between the Pacific Highway and Vale Street. Changes to traffic signals and other improvements such as turning lanes were also recommended. Each infrastructure improvement contributes to an integrated system to facilitate vehicular, pedestrian and bicycle circulation around the Local Centre of Gordon.
Roads and Maritime Services (RMS) endorsed this strategic traffic planning for Gordon as part of the rezoning of the Local Centre for intensive redevelopment. The delivery of these roads is integral to the effective functioning of Gordon as the population increases.
Both Local Environmental Plans included the initial zoning of selected sites for the link roads as SP2 Infrastructure for acquisition for the delivery of infrastructure. These sites would revert to a residential zoning after acquisition. The Development Control Plans (including the most recent revision in 2016) and the Public Domain Plan (PDP) outlined concept designs for these roads. The Contributions Plan (CP) made – and continues to make – financial provision for both the acquisition of property and the progressive delivery of these identified new roads.
Ku-ring-gai Council has been actively acquiring the SP2 zoned land to facilitate the-ongoing delivery of the long-term adopted strategy. The delivery of roads is underway with the first complete link, Beans Farm Road, between McIntyre Street and Dumaresq Street, delivered in 2015. Council also owns both 32 Dumaresq Street and 33 Moree Street which is the site of the road link between Dumaresq Street and Moree Street.
The timeline below indicates the current progression of the delivery of Council’s adopted strategic vision for traffic circulation in Gordon as redevelopment takes place.
Timeline to Gordon Link Roads
2008 Strategic Traffic Studies supporting anticipated redevelopment in Gordon Local Centre
2009 Preparation and exhibition of LEP, DCP, s94 Contributions Plan and Public Domain Plan
2010 Adoption of first suite of Town Centres Strategic Planning Policy documents (LEP, DCP, PDP and CP)
2011 Acquisition of 41 Dumaresq Street (later part of Beans Farm Road) in March
2011 Acquisition of 32 Dumaresq Street in June
2011 Acquisition of 36 McIntyre Street (later part of Beans Farm Road) in July
2012 Adoption of revised Local Centres Strategic Planning Policy documents (LEP, DCP)
2014 Execution of VPA for the delivery of partial road on 32 Dumaresq section of road link between Dumaresq and Moree Streets
2014 Construction of Beans Farm Road commences between Dumaresq and McIntyre Streets
2015 Beans Farm Road officially opened
2015 Pre-DA for Moree Street property adjoining the future road in September
2015 Compulsory acquisition of 33 Moree Street gazetted in June and finalised in December.
2016 Demolition of improvements on 33 Moree Street thence geotechnical and contamination testing and reporting, surveys and design processes commenced.
Voluntary Planning Agreements or Council-instigated delivery
Voluntary Planning Agreements are a legal mechanism to facilitate infrastructure to be delivered concurrent with a specific development. This is particularly beneficial where there is a direct relationship between the infrastructure and the development.
In the case of the Gordon roads, the adjoining development can be designed with direct access to the side road rather than the main road. This reduces driveway crossings on the main road (e.g. Dumaresq Street or Moree Street) particularly in close proximity to the intersection of the new road with the main road. This enhances pedestrian safety as well as the movement of pedestrians, cyclists and vehicles. Orientating the development towards the new road also gives an active frontage to that road enhancing pedestrian safety. However, the development will be impacted if the road is not delivered concurrent with the development so that it is open and useable in time for residents to move-in i.e. so as not to delay the Occupation Certificate. As such, delivery of the road by the developer, secured by a legal agreement, facilitates surety for all parties.
Voluntary planning agreements can also deliver infrastructure earlier than Council may have been in a position to achieve by offsetting future monetary contributions from the subject development rather than current contributions reserves, which can be directed to other identified projects in the Contributions Plan. In this way, more infrastructure is available earlier for the benefit of all users in the community.
It is important to note, however, that Planning Agreements must be voluntary on both sides. Council cannot compel a developer to enter into an agreement, nor can Council be compelled.
In this context, it should be noted that Beans Farm Road was initially intended to be delivered by way of a VPA and discussions had commenced with the original development team who had secured a large site with frontages to both Dumaresq Street and McIntyre Street. However, after the repeal of the 2010 Town Centres LEP, the property was on-sold and the new developer did not wish to commence discussions to deliver the road via a VPA.
Ultimately Council delivered Beans Farm Road itself. While the opportunity for future development downhill from the road to have direct access to that road remains a future option, that opportunity has been lost for the now completed uphill development.
The road link from Dumaresq to Moree is complex in the sense that it is proceeding on a two-VPA basis with different developers fronting Dumaresq Street and Moree Street. The executed VPA for the Dumaresq development dates from 2014 and was prepared to a concept design stage for a temporarily terminating half-road ending just short of the future culvert at a time when Council had no certainty concerning the timing of acquisition of 33 Moree Street.
The design process for the new road has included facilitating costing the road in three sections named for convenience: Dumaresq section, culvert and Moree section. This is because the culvert at the low point of the road needs to be delivered by either Council or, alternatively, by the first developer to proceed with delivering their development.
Principles of Voluntary Planning Agreements
Planning Agreements are authorised by s93F of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.
93F Planning agreements
(1) A planning agreement is a voluntary agreement or other arrangement under this Division between a planning authority (or 2 or more planning authorities) and a person (the developer):
(a) who has sought a change to an environmental planning instrument, or
(b) who has made, or proposes to make, a development application, or
(c) who has entered into an agreement with, or is otherwise associated with, a person to whom paragraph (a) or (b) applies, under which the developer is required to dedicate land free of cost, pay a monetary contribution, or provide any other material public benefit, or any combination of them, to be used for or applied towards a public purpose.
It is essential to note that Planning Agreements must be voluntary. So integral is this concept that Planning Agreements are typically referred to as Voluntary Planning Agreements. Neither the developer, not the Council, can be obliged to agree to terms within a VPA other than voluntarily.
Comments
The adjoining site and development application
The developers of 29 – 31 Moree Street, Gordon were initially conceptualising a stand-alone development gaining access directly off Moree Street. This would have placed their driveway egress close to the future corner of the new link road and failed to achieve the planning objective of orientating driveways access points to secondary roads. In discussions with the development team, the development access was reorientated to the new road and separate (arm’s length) discussions about its delivery via a VPA were commenced.
The proposed development has been through a number of amendments during 2016, some of which impacted on the potential position of the culvert in the new road because of the impact on site drainage. These have now been resolved with the development in its final design form being adopted at the OMC on 28 February 2017.
The development consent remains tied to the provision of access to and from it, however, which prompts the advancement of this draft VPA for exhibition in principle. Concept plans for the road are detailed and can be attached to the draft VPA, however final construction drawings are not quite completed as yet. These are anticipated this month, after which final cost estimates can be derived. At this point in time, final construction drawings, costed in three sections, are expected to be available before the close of the exhibition and available to Council when the draft Planning Agreement is again reported to Council following statutory exhibition.
Management of the delivery of the road link in sections
The two-developer delivery model is undeniably logistically challenging. However, at the time the Dumaresq Street developer commenced preliminary designs, the negotiation of a partial terminating road link was the only feasible option given that Council did not then own 33 Moree Street.
A council cannot feasibly delay or prevent a private development if it addresses the statutory planning controls. Therefore, the only way to achieve driveway access to the new road rather than to Dumaresq Street in a location in close proximity to the intersection with the future road, was to enter into discussions for developer delivery of a partial road. This was finalised in 2014 with the execution of that VPA.
Council also has no control over the timing of the activation of a development consent. The subject development site was on-sold after approval and the executed VPA was novated to the new owners. A second development consent was approved in April 2016. The current owners of the site recently instigated the development with demolition works undertaken in January-February 2017. The outcome is that both developments are likely to be underway during 2017.
The compulsory acquisition of the property to permit the continuance of the road link through to Moree Street was published in the Government Gazette in June 2015. However, it took a little longer to finalise terms, with the site vacated on 23 December 2015. Access for a site survey was achieved and a CDC for demolition was promptly lodged, which was approved in February 2016. Demolition commenced as soon as feasible afterwards following procurement procedures, followed by geotechnical surveys, site contamination reports and a further detailed survey. Design of the road to construction drawing standards commenced following receipt of survey and geotechnical documentation.
The design of the road has changed a number of times during design to accommodate drainage from adjoining upstream properties resulting in delays in fixing the position of the culvert. The position of the culvert is critical in determining how much of each part of the road each developer will be allocated. At present, the executed VPA for Dumaresq Street contains only the concept design of a terminating road which represented all that was achievable in 2014 prior to the acquisition of 33 Moree Street.
Final construction drawings for the entire road link from Dumaresq Street to Moree Street able to be costed in three sections: Dumaresq Street section; culvert; Moree Street section were initially anticipated to be available earlier this year but are now expected this month – the complexity of the two-developer delivery model has had some impact in this timing. From a logistical viewpoint, whichever developer proceeds first should undertake the delivery of the culvert, unless Council itself delivers this work with each developer to link their section of the road thereto. Options for delivering the culvert remain under active discussion.
The concept designs for the road link can be viewed at Attachment A1 and is to be annexed to the VPA as indicative only with the extent of the road to be delivered by each developer to be determined. The draft VPA contains wording to facilitate the future resolution of the extent of the works. Until the culvert is on the point of delivery, the draft VPA must not exclude scenario provisions.
Drafting the latest Planning Agreement
The Dumaresq Street development with the executed planning agreement is on R4 land and is a high density development of 34 dwellings in the form of units.
By contrast, the Moree Street development is on R3 land and is a medium density development of 15 dwellings in the form of townhouses.
This difference in scale also gives rise to a considerable difference in the development contributions attributable to each development.
In short, the contributions arising from the Dumaresq Street development are likely to be of a similar order, or, at least, not significantly less, than the actual cost of delivering part of the link road.
The contributions arising from the Moree Street development are expected to be substantially less than the cost of delivering part of the road. As such a different approach has been required to this VPA.
It would be unreasonable for the developers of the much smaller development to bear the upfront cost of the delivery of a partial road that is expected to substantially exceed the contributions arising from their development (which were calculated as $413,365.62 for the last OMC). Such a proposal would never have achieved the voluntary agreement of both sides and, as such, would have been in breach of the principles behind voluntary agreements.
The current draft Planning Agreement contains a process of the developers bearing the cost of the road instigation until their development contributions have been exhausted and thence, effectively, acting as contractors for Council. An independent QS will be engaged to ensure costs are limited to the actual reasonable costs of delivering the road. This is the current position reached after a number of alternatives and options have been explored.
Council staff have proposed a number of alternative options for limiting the cost of the road including shared incentives to bring the road in under budget, however these have not been agreed. Returning to the position that planning agreements must be voluntary and that the present draft represents essentially a final offer, it is appropriate to now place it on exhibition. It should also be noted that planning agreements must be voluntary on both sides and the act of placing a draft agreement on exhibition does not compel a council to enter into it.
Options for Road Delivery
The Development Application for 29-31 Moree Street was considered by Council at the OMC of 28 February. The resolution of the mechanism for delivery of the road to which the development requires access is a factor to be finalised before construction of the development can commence.
The draft VPA (Attachment A2) and annexures (Attachment A3 and Attachment A4) to this report is the final formal offer from the applicants for the development of 29-31 Moree Street Gordon and is duly presented for exhibition. It should be noted that agreement to exhibit a draft VPA is simply that and is not an agreement to execute the VPA.
The imminent availability of construction drawings for the entire road link in sections is the starting point for a firm timeline for prospective delivery. This position will open up capacity to reconsider the extent of the road to be ultimately delivered by each party or, indeed, whether some of the road could – or should – be delivered by Council itself, subject to an agreed timeline which will meet the requirement for essential access when it is required (i.e. at Occupation Certificate).
Given the timing constraints however, until an alternate position can be opened for discussion, i.e. following the receipt of final construction drawings, the current process towards VPA-delivery must continue in parallel. This means that the current draft VPA should now proceed to exhibition without delay.
Potential residual land on 33 Moree Street for future divestment after road delivery
The property at 33 Moree Street Gordon is a large L-shaped allotment and not all of it will ultimately be required for the carriageway of the link road. Most of the culvert that is required to manage the flow of water from upstream, under the road and thence downstream, is to be located on 33 Moree Street, although it will partially extend into 32 Dumaresq Street. Until the construction drawings are absolutely finalised, the area of land potentially available for divestment downstream from the culvert must be considered to be unclear.
The only prospective purchaser of the residual land below the culvert would be a future developer who also had an interest in at least 35 and 37 Moree Street and, most likely, 39 Moree Street as well. Council is not aware of any such development interest at this time. This is a point of difference with the Dumaresq section which has active development interest on both sides.
The offset side property boundaries between 32 Dumaresq Street and 33 Moree Street also mean that there is a larger setback between the new link road and the side boundary of the proposed development at 29-31 Moree Street on the high side of the road. Initial designs in 2014 envisaged a curve in the road to maximise residual land west and downstream of the new road, however the complexity of the overall drainage scheme inclusive of the culvert design and its now final location mostly on 33 Moree Street has impacted that preliminary concept at a relatively late stage of the design process.
In the interests of clarity, there is no subdivision, and no sale of land involved in this draft Planning Agreement. The boundaries of both the adjoining development site at 29, 29A and 31 Moree Street and Council’s land at 33 Moree Street will not change as a result of this draft Planning Agreement.
Summary and Recommendations
That Council note that there are still reservations about the capacity for enforcement of measures protecting Council’s interests in fixing an upper limit of the cost of the Moree Street section of the road.
That Council note that the key element in law of any Planning Agreement is that they must be voluntary. Council can no more compel a developer to accept provisions that they are not comfortable with, than a developer can oblige Council to enter into a VPA that it is not fully satisfied with. Notwithstanding, the present draft represents, for the present, the developer’s final offer following months of protracted discussions and is the closest point of agreement to date.
In this context it must be emphasised that the developer has, in good faith, orientated their development to gain access off the proposed new road fitting in with the overall urban design vision for Gordon.
It would have been certainly more straight-forward for the Moree Street developer to decline to enter into discussions concerning the road delivery and to orientate their access directly off Moree Street.
They were, however, willing to enter into discussions with Council to achieve a better outcome both for the development and for Gordon as a whole. Both sides have proceeded in good faith, and the last detail on which a middle road could not be reached is a relatively minor aspect which may yet be resolved by alternative mechanisms.
The associated DA is now approved subject to finalising mechanisms for the delivery of access and Council should, in good faith, now permit the draft Planning Agreement to be exhibited.
Council also notes that the final construction drawings are now imminent. The availability of these documents increases the options available to deliver sections of the road concurrent with the adjoining developments. This does, however, need to be the subject of on-going discussions both internally and with the developers adjoining the Moree-Dumaresq link.
integrated planning and reporting
Theme Three: Places, Spaces and Infrastructure
Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective |
Delivery Program Term Achievement |
Operational Plan Task |
P2.1 A robust planning framework is in place to deliver quality design outcomes and maintain the identity and character of Ku-ring-gai |
Strategies, plans and processes are in place to effectively manage the impact of new development |
P8.1.1.1.1.1-2 Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 ensures new development contributes towards the cost of delivering supporting infrastructure. |
P8.1 An improved standard of infrastructure that meets the community’s service level standards and Council’s obligations as the custodian of our community’s assets |
Our public infrastructure and assets are planned, managed and funded to meet community expectations, defined levels of service and address inter-generational equity |
C6.1.2.1.2; C4.1.2.1.3 New public infrastructure is planned to support new development and ensure that everyone who lives and works in Ku-ring-gai continues to enjoy access to public facilities. |
Theme Four: Access, Traffic and Transport
Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective |
Delivery Program Term Achievement |
Operational Plan Task |
T3.1 An accessible public transport and regional road network that meets the diverse and changing needs of the community |
A strategic access, traffic and transport plan is being implemented for the Northern Sydney Region |
T 1.1.3.1.1 New link roads |
Governance Matters
The negotiation of the draft Planning Agreement was commenced under the Planning Agreement Policy 2008 in December 2015 following the initial pre-DA meeting in late September 2015.
Risk Management
Council has commissioned an external legal team, Sparke Helmore, to assist with the drafting of the Planning Agreement.
There remains an outstanding area of concern within the current draft VPA in terms of the strength of the provisions to cap Council’s costs applicable to the delivery of the road. While options to strengthen this exposure should remain under discussion, the developer’s final offer should be formally placed on exhibition for public comment noting that this does not commit Council to executing the VPA post-exhibition. Council cannot be committed ahead of a public exhibition process.
Financial Considerations
The strategic planning for the Gordon link roads are incorporated in a suite of strategic planning documents including Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan (Local Centres) 2012 which initially zoned the land for the road SP2 for acquisition for the provision of this infrastructure; Ku-ring-gai Development Control Plan; Ku-ring-gai Public Domain Plan 2010 and Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010.
Council has already expended contributions income for the acquisition of land at 32 Dumaresq Street and 33 Moree Street Gordon for the delivery of this road link.
Council has also received income from the sale of the residual components of land on both sides of the road carriageway reservation on 32 Dumaresq Street, which was returned, as required, to the Restricted Assets record of development contributions.
There will also be a portion of residual land on 33 Moree Street downstream and below the link road due to its “L-shape” that will be available for divestment. However the exact residual area cannot be confirmed until the design of the road to construction drawings is complete. As this area will be land-locked, there is the possibility it may not be divested and could become a small park, however, its divestment is preferred both due to the inherent maintenance costs of very small reserves and to provide additional funding for the delivery of the road on this more challenging topography.
Formal QS estimated costs will not be feasible until the completion of the construction drawings. It is currently expected that construction drawings will be completed this month, with a QS cost available in early April. However, the exhibition can proceed on the basis of the concept plans, which are quite detailed.
Social Considerations
The delivery of the road link between Dumaresq Street and Moree Street, which this draft Planning Agreement is an important part of facilitating, benefits the community by providing improved connectivity for pedestrians, cyclists and drivers.
Additionally, the location of the driveways to the development direct to the link road enables the removal of the driveway crossings on Moree Street for 29, 29A and 31 Moree Street. This supports traffic flow in Moree Street and reduces pedestrian hazards.
Environmental Considerations
The design of the road link to the standard of construction drawings has been undertaken by an internal team involving staff from Operations and from the Sustainability Unit, supporting a consultant team from Taylor Thomson Whitting (TTW). The draft Planning Agreement includes requirements for the process of delivering the partial road link. Environmental considerations have been part of the design strategy for this road link.
Community Consultation
The purpose of this report is to recommend placing the draft Planning Agreement on Public Exhibition to seek the views of the community on the delivery of public infrastructure concurrent with adjoining development.
This exhibition is part of the implementation process of the strategic planning for Gordon which has also been exhibited in the forms of LEPs, DCPs, the Public Domain Plan and the Contributions Plan.
Internal Consultation
An internal team from Urban Planning, Operations, Asset Management, Sustainability and Council’s Corporate Lawyer have been closely involved either with the negotiation of this Planning Agreement and/or the preparation of the construction drawings for the road - with the views of other sections sought when required. Sparke Helmore has been retained to support Council in the legal processes. The design of the road link from Dumaresq Street to Moree Street has been undertaken by Taylor Thomson Whitting (TTW) project managed by the Operations Team who are also directly involved in the Planning Agreement.
Moree Terraces Pty Ltd, a division of China Venture CV Pty Ltd, have been represented by Gadens Lawyers.
Summary
This report provides an overview of the progress towards the delivery of the road link in sections between Dumaresq Street and Moree Street by two developments which adjoin that road.
The main purpose of this report is to recommend the statutory exhibition of the draft Planning Agreement for the Moree Street section of the road link.
It should be noted that the Planning Agreement for the Dumaresq Street section has already been executed and the adjoining development site has completed demolition on their site and commenced earthworks. It is in the best interests of the community if both sections of the road are delivered in temporal proximity if feasible.
The statutory exhibition is not the final step in the process. Council must still consider the results of the exhibition and formally agree to enter into the Planning Agreement at a subsequent Council Meeting. In the interim, it is expected that final construction drawings and a QS cost estimate of each section will be completed.
A. That public notice of the exhibition of the draft Planning Agreement and Explanatory Note relating to the property at 29, 29A and 31 Moree Street, Gordon for the purposes of delivering part of the road link adjoining that property and providing access to it, be duly given, and a copy of those documents be made available for inspection, in accordance with the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.
B. That the General Manager be given delegated authority to negotiate any terms of the Planning Agreement with Moree Terraces Pty Ltd that do not or will not affect the core intention of the contributions to be made under that agreement to protect Council’s interests in the delivery of the future public road.
C. That a further report be submitted to Council following the public exhibition period.
D. That Council endorse staff negotiating the delivery the central culvert in the Moree to Dumaresq link road which lies across the boundary of 32 Dumaresq Street and 33 Moree Street, in the most timely and logistically efficient manner whether by one or the other developer or by Council itself.
|
Kate Paterson Infrastructure Co-ordinator |
Antony Fabbro Manager Urban & Heritage Planning |
Andrew Watson Director Strategy & Environment |
|
Dumaresq to Moree road link concept design |
|
2017/040841 |
||
|
Draft Voluntary Planning Agreement for part Moree to Dumaresq link road - exhibition version |
|
2017/058136 |
|
|
Council Land - Annexure A to the VPA |
|
2017/058292 |
|
|
Development Land - Annexure B |
|
2017/058291 |
APPENDIX No: 2 - Draft Voluntary Planning Agreement for part Moree to Dumaresq link road - exhibition version |
|
Item No: GB.5 |
Ordinary Meeting of Council - 14 March 2017 |
GB.6 / 170 |
|
|
Item GB.6 |
S02543 |
|
27 February 2017 |
Proposed site for a new Rural Fire Services building at Koola Park
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
purpose of report: |
For Council to provide an in-principle agreement to the Rural Fire Service for the building of a fire station at Koola Park, Killara. |
|
|
background: |
The District Manager for the Hornsby Ku-ring-gai District of the Rural Fire Service contacted Council in 2016 expressing a need for the establishment of a new fire station at Killara to assist with fire control in east side of the Ku-ring-gai Local Government area. A number of sites were considered but the preferred location which did not impact on residential and retail properties was at Koola Park. |
|
|
comments: |
The Rural Fire Service (RFS) has indicated the need for another fire station in the Ku-ring-gai area to assist with fire control. With the success of the new fire station at Wahroonga, there is an increase in volunteers and therefore, an opportunity exists for a new fire station in a strategic part of Ku-ring-gai. The RFS has undertaken community consultation on the possibility of locating a Category 2 or Category 3 building at Koola Park to help meet the future needs of the RFS. Funding the new building is through the Rural Fire Fighting Fund and is fully funded by the RFS. |
|
|
recommendation: |
That Council provide an in-principle support for the building of a new fire station at Koola Park with the exact location to be determined subject to further negotiations with the Crown Lands Department. |
Purpose of Report
For Council to provide an in-principle agreement to the Rural Fire Service for the building of a fire station at Koola Park, Killara.
Background
The District Manager for the Hornsby Ku-ring-gai District of the Rural Fire Service contacted Council in 2016 expressing a need for the establishment of a new fire station at Killara to assist with fire control in the east side of the Ku-ring-gai Local Government area. A number of sites were considered. The preferred location, which did not impact on residential and retail properties, was at Koola Park.
Comments
The Rural Fire Service (RFS) has indicated the need for another fire station in the Ku-ring-gai area to assist with fire control. With the success of the new fire station at Wahroonga, there is an increase in volunteers and therefore an opportunity exists for a new fire station in a strategic part of Ku-ring-gai.
The District Manager for the Hornsby Ku-ring-gai District of the RFS contacted Council staff in 2016 indicating the demand for a new fire station and the possible locations for a new station. It was initially proposed to locate the new fire station near the shopping centre at East Killara. However, business owners objected to the proposal.
It was then identified the station could be located near the car park at Koola Park. While this location has not been ruled out, the site proposed at the rear of the car park, is a sloping block and would incur additional costs associated with cut and fill and additional piling for the foundations of the building.
The preferred location for the building was identified to be on the site where the old Scout Hall is located and currently not used by the Scouts Association. Discussions have been held with the Scouts Association and the School Principal on the preferred site. There is general support for the location of the new fire station to be on site of the old scout hall. The Scouts Association have indicated they are willing to relinquish their use of the site subject to Council or the RFS paying for the demolition of the old building. The District Manager for the RFS has indicated funding for the demolition could be included in the budget for the new station.
As the Scout Hall is located on Crown Land, it will be necessary for Council to seek permissive occupancy and a change of use from the Crown Lands Department if the new RFS building is to be located on the site of the old Scout Hall.
The RFS has undertaken community consultation on the possibility of locating a Category 2 or Category 3 building at Koola Park to help meet the future needs of the RFS. Funding the new building is through the Rural Fire Fighting Fund and is fully funded by the RFS.
A copy of the results of the community consultation undertaken by the RFS is included as Attachment 1 to this report. Also, Attachment 2 is a plan of a Category 3 fire station.
At this stage, it has not been determined whether it would be a Category 2 or a Category 3 fire station. This will depend on costs and available budget.
integrated planning and reporting
Working together as a community to protect and enhance our natural environment and resources.
Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective |
Delivery Program Term Achievement |
Operational Plan Task |
N4.1.2 Council’s vulnerability to climate change is reduced.
|
Develop initiatives to build Council’s capacity to prepare, respond and recover to the increasing severity and frequency of extreme weather events as a result of a changing climate. |
Pursue viable opportunities for a community volunteer network to respond to extreme weather events.
|
Governance Matters
Council is required to provide facilities for volunteers for emergency services and contribute to these facilities through annual fees.
Risk Management
The additional fire station will assist with fire control in the east side of the Local Government area. This will reduce the threat of property destruction from bush fires.
The location of the fire station will require approval from the Crown Lands Department. If permissive occupancy is not granted then the alternative site at the rear of the car park may need to be chosen as the location of the fire station.
Financial Considerations
The building of the new fire station is funded from the Rural Fire Fighting Fund and will be fully funded by the Rural Fire Service. There may be a need to upgrade the power supply as the existing power supply is on the limit for the area. However, this will be required no matter what location is decided for the building.
Social Considerations
The provision of new fire station will attract additional volunteers to assist with fire control in the east side of the LGA. This will assist the community with the protection of private property.
Environmental Considerations
The additional resources will assist with hazard reduction and improve the biodiversity of the bushland. A Review of Environmental Factors will be required for the building.
Community Consultation
Community consultation has been undertaken by the RFS. Details of the consultation have been included in the attachments to this report.
Consultation has also taken place with the Scouts Association and the School Principal and Parents and Citizens Association.
Internal Consultation
Consultation has taken place with staff from Strategy and Environment on the preferred location for the siting of the fire station.
Summary
The District Manager for the Hornsby Ku-ring-gai District of the Rural Fire Service contacted Council in 2016 expressing a need for the establishment of a new fire station at Killara to assist with fire control in east side of the LGA. A number of sites were considered but the preferred location which did not impact on residential and retail properties was at Koola Park.
The Rural Fire Service (RFS) has indicated the need for another fire station in the Ku-ring-gai area to assist with fire control. With the success of the new fire station at Wahroonga, there is an increase in volunteers. Therefore, an opportunity exists for a new fire station in a strategic part of Ku-ring-gai.
The RFS has undertaken community consultation on the possibility of locating a Category 2 or Category 3 building at Koola Park to help meet the future needs of the RFS.
Funding the new building is through the Rural Fire Fighting Fund and is fully funded by the RFS.
That Council provide an in-principle support for the building of a new fire station at Koola Park with the exact location to be determined subject to further negotiations with the Crown Lands Department.
|
Greg Piconi Director Operations |
|
Community consultation - sruvey results |
|
2017/051960 |
||
|
Catergory 3 - new RFS building plans |
|
2017/052191 |