Minute Ku-ring-gai Council Page
MINUTES OF Ku-ring-gai Traffic Committee
HELD ON Thursday, 28 February 2019
Present: |
Ku-ring-gai Council (Councillor Cedric Spencer, Chairperson) Ku-ring-gai Council (Councillor Peter Kelly, Deputy Chairperson) Ku-ring-gai Council (Councillor Sam Ngai) Director Operations (George Bounassif) Roads & Maritime Services (Peter Carruthers) Roads & Maritime Services (Mitchell Ryan) Representing Police Local Area Command Ku-ring-gai (Snr Const Narelle Tomich) Representing Police Local Area Command North Shore (Const James Logan) Representing Member for Davidson (Michael Lane) Representing Member for Ku-ring-gai (David Ross) State Member for Ku-ring-gai (Alister Henskens) |
|
|
Staff Present: |
Manager Traffic and Transport (Deva Thevaraja) Manager Regulation and Compliance ( Anne Seaton) Team Leader Traffic (Michael Foskett) Team Leader Regulation (Tony McCormack) Strategic Transport Engineer (Joseph Piccoli) Administration Officer (Nala Redford) |
|
|
Others Present: |
Representing Bike North (Ms Lyness Beavis) |
|
|
Apologies: |
Nil |
The Meeting commenced at 9.00am
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
No interest was declared.
CONFIRMATION OF MINUTEs
Representing Police Local Area Command Ku-ring-gai arrived during discussion
GENERAL BUSINESS
File: TM11/11 Vide: GB.3
|
|
|
To consider the installation of traffic calming devices along Roland Avenue, Wahroonga.
|
|
The Committee’s Comments:
The Manager Traffic and Transport spoke on this item to outline the traffic issues and the proposed options.
The Representative for Bike North agreed with the proposed calming measures on Roland Avenue but suggested that parking be further restricted around the sharp corner where rumble bars are in place.
The Member for Ku-ring-gai supported the proposed calming measures.
|
|
That a detailed design be carried out for two lane angled slow points at four locations along Roland Avenue, as shown in Plan Roland/KTC/02/19.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY |
State Member for Ku-ring-gai departed during discussion
Representing Bike North departed during discussion
File: TM6/11 Vide: GB.5
|
|
|
To consider widening Tryon Road on both sides of Archbold Road to allow sufficient width to provide right turn bays.
|
|
The Committee’s Comments:
Team Leader Traffic spoke on this item to outline the traffic issues and the proposed options.
The Representing Member for Davidson suggested to look at items GB.5 and GB.6 as an area wide review to be able to seek funding from higher sources.
Councillor Ngai discussed the existing traffic condition and driver behaviour at this signalised intersection, and he welcomes the proposed treatment.
|
|
That subject to available funding, a detailed design be prepared for the widening of Tryon Road at Archbold Road. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY |
File: TM6/11 Vide: GB.6
|
|
|
To consider measures to improve safety at several unsignalised intersections along Archbold Road, Lindfield.
|
|
The Committee’s Comments:
That Council’s Team Leader Traffic & Transport spoke on this item to outline the traffic issues and the proposed options.
Councillor Ngai discussed the option of introducing ‘Left Only’ during peak periods, being ‘Mon-Fri 6-10am & 3-7pm’.
Representing Member for Davidson discussed the option of introducing ‘No Right Turn’ restriction during peak periods only, being ‘Mon-Fri 6-10am & 3-7pm’ and review this after 12 months.
Following extensive discussion between the Committee Members, it was decided to restrict right turn movements out of the eastern leg of Chelmsford Avenue onto Archbold Road. |
|
That ‘Left Only’ restrictions be introduced on the eastern leg of Chelmsford Avenue at Archbold Road, as shown on Plan No. Chelmsford/KTC/02/19.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY |
File: TM8/11 Vide: GB.7
|
|
|
To consider the installation of ‘No Stopping 8am-9.30am, 2.30pm-4pm School Days’ restrictions on the northern side of Park Avenue near Archbold Road.
|
|
The Committee’s Comments:
The Manager Traffic & Transport spoke on this item to outline the traffic issues and the proposed options. He advised that the proposed part-time kerbside restriction is to discourage parent/carers from parking in Park Avenue and dangerously crossing the road during school peak hours. Further this restriction would provide better visibility for the residents when exiting their properties.
The Representing Member for Davidson informed the Committee that residents of Park Avenue attempted twice to introduce parking restrictions outside their properties. He believes that their driveways are not different to other driveways in Ku-ring-gai and they should be treated equally. He further advised that when parents park their vehicles on the northern side of Park Avenue and escort their children, then there is no issue of danger. Taking all these into consideration, he believes that the proposed restrictions in Park Avenue is unnecessary.
The Manager Traffic & Transport advised that parents have the option of parking closer to Roseville Public School rather than parking a couple of blocks away from the school. The proposed kerbside restrictions in Park Avenue is mainly to address the dangerous pedestrian safety at Archbold Road intersection rather than to address residents’ concern with restricted visibility.
|
|
A. That ‘No Stopping 8am-9.30am, 2.30pm-4pm School Days’ restrictions be installed on the northern side of Park Avenue near Archbold Road, as shown in Plan Park/TDA/188/18 Rev 1.
B. That the double centre lines in Park Avenue at Archbold Road be modified, as shown in Plan Park/KTC/02/19 Rev 1.
C. That residents of No. 2 Park Avenue, 33 Archbold Road and Council’s Team Leader Regulation be informed of Council’s decision.
For the Recommendation: Councillor Spencer, Roads & Maritime Services and Representing Police Local Area Command North Shore
Against the Recommendation: Representing Member for Davidson
|
File: TM6/11 Vide: GB.8
|
|
|
To consider the installation of ‘No Stopping’ restrictions on all four legs of the intersection of Ortona Road and Eton Road, Lindfield.
|
|
The Committee’s Comments:
The Manager Traffic & Transport informed the Committee that this proposal was a minor one, but received objection from the Representing Member for Davidson when considered under the Delegated Authority. He advised that this intersection is heavily used by parents. Particularly in the afternoon peak hours when they park their vehicles too close to the intersection and walk to Lindfield Public School for collecting their children. The proposal is to formalise the statutory parking restrictions at this intersection whilst maximising the kerbside parking spaces in Ortona Road. As a result of this exercise, the statutory restrictions have gone beyond the recommended 10m at any intersections. He further said that the proposal with increased statutory restrictions does not result in the loss of any parking spaces in Ortona Road, but provided increased visibility at the intersection.
The Representing Member for Davidson informed the Committee that his objection to this proposal is not about signposting. Rather, he welcomed the introduction of statutory ‘No Stopping’ restrictions at intersections but they must be consistent with standards. He believes that all statutory restrictions shall be 10m from any intersections and there must be a good reason for moving them further. In this case he believes there is no good reason for increasing the recommended statutory restrictions.
The Representing Member for RMS advised that Council can opt to increase the recommended statutory restrictions at intersection depending on situations. These situations can be the presence of driveways and turning paths of vehicles at the intersection. He supports Council’s proposal to increase the restrictions further than the recommended 10m in this case.
|
|
A. That ‘No Stopping’ restrictions be installed on Ortona Road at Eton Road, as shown in Plan Ortona/KTC/02/19.
B. That Council’s Team Leader Regulation be informed of Council’s decision.
For the Resolution: Councillor Spencer, Roads & Maritime Services and Representing Police Local Area Command North Shore
Against the Resolution: Representing Member for Davidson
The above Resolution was subject to an Amendment which
was LOST. The Lost Amendment was: That Stop signs outside property numbers 6, 7 and 9 be placed at 10 metres from the intersection.
For the Recommendation: Representing Member for Davidson
Against the Recommendation: Councillor Spencer, Roads & Maritime Services and Representing Police Local Area Command North Shore
|
general discussion
Member for Davidson
1. Intersection of Balfour Street & Pacific Highway, Lindfield.
Response: Council has prepared a traffic scheme for the Lindfield local centre, which includes modifications to this intersection. Council’s proposal for this intersection is to extend the right turn bay on Pacific Highway (northbound) that provides access to the railway underpass, and to ban right turns from Havilah Road (“underpass road”) onto Pacific Highway and transfer right turn movements to the proposed traffic signals at the intersection of Strickland Avenue and Pacific Highway.
2. Intersection of Tryon Road and Lindfield Avenue, Lindfield.
Response: Discussions with RMS and Transport for NSW are ongoing concerning the intersection configuration. In the meantime, staff are in the early stages of preparing a Request For Quotation for the detailed civil works and traffic signal design for the new traffic signal installation at this intersection.
3. Intersection of Pacific Highway and Beaconsfield Parade, Lindfield.
Response: The proposed signalisation of this intersection is also included in the traffic scheme for the Lindfield local centre, and is the also the subject of RMS review. The upgrade to this intersection is closely related to the Lindfield Village Hub, the proposal for which has not been finalised yet.
4. Archbold Road at Owen Street, Roseville/Lindfield.
Response: Survey of the intersection completed including identifying underground services. A design is yet to be commenced.
The Meeting closed at 10:40 am