Ordinary Meeting of Council

TO BE HELD ON Tuesday, 29 April 2014 AT 7.00pm

Level 3 Council Chambers

 

 

Agenda

** ** ** ** ** **

 

 

NOTE:  For Full Details, See Council’s Website –

www.kmc.nsw.gov.au under the link to business papers

 

 

APOLOGIEs

 

 

 

DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

 

 

 

Confirmation of Reports to be Considered in Closed Meeting

 

 

 

Address the Council

NOTE:           Persons who address the Council should be aware that their address will be tape recorded.

 

 

 

Documents Circulated to Councillors

 

 

 

CONFIRMATION OF MINUTEs

 

Minutes of Ordinary Meeting of Council                                                                         9

File: S02131

Meeting held 8 April 2014

Minutes numbered 100 to 113

 

 

 

minutes from the Mayor

 

MM.1       Ku-ring-gai Flying-Fox Reserve                                                                                     50

 

File: CY00416/2

 

The Ku-ring-gai Flying-Fox Reserve (KFFR), located in Gordon, has been subject to a Conservation Agreement, entered into between Ku-ring-gai Council and the NSW Government, since February 1991, to ensure the continuing protection and preservation of native flora and fauna, in particular the Grey-headed Flying-fox colony and all elements of its habitat, within the Ku-ring-gai Flying-fox Reserve (KFFR).

 

Historically the Flying-fox colony has moved periodically around the KFFR.  At times when the Flying-fox colony inhabits the deeper areas of the Reserve the impacts to residents have been negligible. However, since 2009 the flying-fox colony has inhabited an area very close to properties adjacent to the KFFR, in Taylor and Waugoola Streets (see Ku-ring-gai Flying-Fox Management Plan 2013 – Appendix 6).

 

This has led to persistent disturbance to residents in Taylor and Waugoola Streets over a number of years, caused by the noise, smell and droppings, especially around the breeding period (March - April) where numbers are in the tens of thousands and intolerable noise levels are experienced by residents for large periods of the day and night. This has resulted in severe impacts to the quality of life for these residents over prolonged periods.

 

Ku-ring-gai Council has an obligation to protect and conserve its threatened ecological communities, species and populations, as well to protect the interests and wellbeing of its residents. The Ku-ring-gai Flying-fox Management Plan, most recently reviewed and endorsed by Council in August 2013, attempts to strike a balance between these two equally important aims, within a prescribed management framework largely determined by State and federal legislation, for example, the Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 and the Environment Protection & Biodiversity Conservation (EPBC) Act 1999. This is further complicated by the conditions of the Conservation Agreement.

 

Management actions in the KFFR Management Plan, aimed at reducing the impacts of the Flying-foxes on residents and their properties (especially those adjacent to the KFFR) are as follows:

 

•        Investigate and secure an alternative location for the Flying-fox release cage (away from residential housing), as part of the KFFR rehabilitation and release program.

 

•        Collaborate with relevant agencies, organisations, councils and Flying-fox experts on best practice Flying-fox management for implementation within the KFFR

 

•        Prepare and submit licence and referral applications to initiate strategic tree removal and vegetation modification works in the KFFR close to residential housing on Taylor Street and Waugoola Street

 

•        Conduct approved strategic tree removal and vegetation modification works in the KFFR close to residential housing on Taylor Street and Waugoola Street

 

•        Formalise community engagement processes to ensure that local community groups and residents are consulted and updated on management activities within the KFFR.

 

•        Elevate community engagement efforts during periods of greatest community concern, for example, when Flying-foxes numbers are at their highest during the breeding season

 

•        Review and determine the feasibility of potential Flying-fox management options on an annual basis, for implementation within the KFFR before the breeding season commences,  including, but not limited to:

o        Providing information and / or securing funding for sound insulation in dwellings adjacent to the KFFR

o        Strategic tree removal and vegetation modification works at the boundary between the KFFR and private property where there is a risk to life or property or where there is significant noise disturbance to residents over prolonged periods (that is, over a number of breeding seasons)

o        Effective, humane and legal methods to nudge the Flying-fox camp away from the Reserve edges (where Flying-foxes are less than 50m from habitable dwellings and causing significant noise disturbance to residents over prolonged periods).

 

•        Implement feasible Flying-fox management options within the KFFR on an annual basis, before the breeding season commences

 

•       Investigate ways to incorporate Flying-fox information or guidelines into 149 certificates

 

•        Engage with proponents of any activities which may impact the KFFR (such as planned dispersals)

 

Unfortunately, the activities conducted to date have had little success in alleviating the impacts on residents adjacent to the Reserve. Despite ongoing investigations, there appears to be no feasible (effective, humane and legal) or affordable methods to successfully nudge the Flying-fox camp away from the Reserve edges. Whilst Council staff are empathetic with residents, all options have been exhausted within the current legal and management framework in which Council operates.

 

In light of the above, I move the following to ensure that the management issues associated with the KFFR, specifically the impact on the residents, are elevated to the Minister for Environment:

 

 

MM.2       Award Certificates for former Councillor Ian Cross                                                  53

 

File: CY00455/2

 

Tonight we honour a former long-serving Councillor, Ian Cross who retired in 2012.

 

Ian Cross was first elected to Council in 1999 in Wahroonga Ward. He has served as Mayor for four terms, from 2002 to 2004 and from 2009 to 2011. He was also Deputy Mayor for the 2001-2002 term.

 

Ian has chaired or served on committees including finance, heritage, sustainability and open space, parks and reserves.

 

We all know of the demands civic office can place on our lives. Successfully performing the role of a local Councillor can require an enormous amount of commitment and dedication with very little financial reward.

 

Ian has been awarded two NSW Local Government and Shires Associations’ awards: the Certificate of Service Award and the Emeritus Mayor Certificate, which honours Mayors who have served a minimum of three one-year terms.

 

On behalf of the Ku-ring-gai community, I thank Ian for his valuable contributions to our community and invite him to receive his two awards certificates.

  

 

 

Petitions

 

PT.1        Petition Against the Development of a Child Care Centre at 17 Bandalong Avenue, Pymble – (Two Hundred and Twenty [220] Signatures                                           54

 

File: DA0060/14

 

“We, the undersigned, petition Ku-ring-gai Council to reject the establishment of a child care centre at 17 Bandalong Avenue, West Pymble for the following reasons:

 

       Traffic volume increase from 6.30am (the Centre’s proposed opening times 6.30am to 6.30pm);

 

       Increased parking on the street – only 3 onsite parking spots are available for 36 families;

 

       The Centre is proposed to be built on the blind bend of Bandalong Avenue – this is a safety issue for crossing the road and local pedestrians;

 

       There are already Child Care Centres in West Pymble that have spaces available including a new Centre being built on Yanko Road;

 

       Traffic congestion will cause problems for local service access, for example: buses and the garbage service.

 

We are indicating our strong opposition to this development as we fear it will result in uncharacteristically large built form for the area, increased traffic congestion, road and pedestrian safety and undue noise.  Additionally, the proposed building is non-compliant in respect of numerous developmental controls – so therefore it should be refused by Council as a matter of course.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PT.2        Objection to Culling of Feral Rabbits – (One Hundred and Ninety-Four [194] Signatures                                                                                                                                                55

 

File: S04668

 

“To the Australian Government, Ku-ring-gai Council, Urban Feral Animal Action Group (UFAAG), NSW, we, the undersigned world-wide, object to Ku-ring-gai Council, as well as other Councils in the Northern Sydney region releasing a deadly virus causing Rabbit Hemorrhagic Disease (RHD) into the national parks of Northern Sydney targeting wild rabbits.  This virus causes “a slow and painful death”, taking two to three days to kill its host, causing them to bleed internally.  This is inhumane, immoral and even more mindless than the introduction of rabbits to Australia in the first place.

 

It’s extremely arrogant to be playing ‘God’ (or rather, the Devil) in effort to exterminate a population of other living creatures, that are by some mis-guided people considered "pests" and that are essentially not very different from us, humans.  According to the scientific discoveries of recent times, there's only 1-2% difference between our and animal genotypes.

 

According to http://www.rabbit.org/care/vhd.html insects, birds and animals such as rodents are known to spread the virus by acting as indirect hosts - spreading the disease from infected to uninfected rabbits.  Humans can also spread the virus to their pet rabbits if they have been in contact with infected rabbits or in contact with surroundings contaminated by the virus.

 

Using viruses as a method of Biological Population control is risky and extremely unethical - a method that should be banned.  Although scientists pride themselves on being able to study, create, propagate and control viruses in the lab, it is a dangerous weapon of consequences we cannot predict. We have no control over what chemicals and environments wild animals are in contact with.  Viruses can mutate or cross over to other species creating something that could be disastrous.  Apart from it being an inhumane and horrendous way to kill an innocent creature we need to take responsibility of the unknown side effects; how it may affect other species, our pets, our children, us and the future of this planet.

 

It's also time that councils become aware that the pesticides they commonly use on so-called weeds are contributing to the disappearance of bees, which threatens our own existence.

 

As to the rabbits, nature will take appropriate care of them and ultimately of us humans, if we continue to spread death and destruction around us.  Rather than "modifying" our natural environment to feed the interests of pharma-chemical cartel, Councils and other government authorities should look to the law of nature by adapting to our habitat, rather than the other way around.  We must recognise the fact that we are part of a living system and to continue our existence we must learn to live in harmony with our habitat and all fellow species.  The use of any artificial life-destroying substances should be banned by those public authorities responsible for protecting our natural habitat.

 

Permaculture is a well known and world wide recognised science, developed by an Australian, Bill Mollison, which if incorporated into our daily practice would make a world of difference in our quality of life.  Why not incorporate Permaculture into the "management" of "our" natural resources, including rabbits?

 

It simply doesn't make sense to continue the destruction of our own nest, even birds know that - Counting on Councils common sense and goodwill, we request that the plans to introduce any biological agents (as well as chemicals used for weed control) into the environment now and in the future be abandoned.

  

 

GENERAL BUSINESS

 

i.               The Mayor to invite Councillors to nominate any item(s) on the Agenda that they wish to have a site inspection.

 

ii.             The Mayor to invite Councillors to nominate any item(s) on the Agenda that they wish to adopt in accordance with the officer’s recommendation allowing for minor changes without debate.

 

 

GB.1        The Novus Foundation 2014 Gala Dinner                                                                   57

 

File: S05650

 

To advise Council of a request from The Novus Foundation to purchase tickets for a Gala Dinner to be held at Miramare Gardens Function Centre, Terrey Hills on Saturday 31 May, 2014.

 

Recommendation:

 

That Council determine whether to purchase tickets for The Novus Foundation 2014 Gala Dinner, and that Councillors who are interested in attending the dinner advise the General Manager by Friday 16 May 2014.

 

 

GB.2        Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters - Inquiry into the 2012 Local Government Elections                                                                                                      70

 

File: S08820

 

To consider the final report received from the Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters in regard to its inquiry into the conduct of the 2012 Local Government Elections.

 

Recommendation:

 

That Council receive and note the report from the Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters in relation to an Inquiry into the 2012 Local Government Elections.

 

 

GB.3        Investment Report as at 31 March 2014                                                                     185

 

File: S05273

 

To present Council’s investment portfolio performance for March 2014.

 

Recommendation:

 

That the summary of investments performance for March 2014 be received and noted; and that the Certificate of the Responsible Accounting Officer be noted and report adopted. 

 

 

GB.4        60 Bannockburn Road, Pymble - Alterations and Additions to the Existing Dwelling                                                                                                                                              194

 

File: DA0015/14

 

Ward: Wahroonga

Applicant: Urbanesque Planning Pty Ltd

Owner: Stephen and Alison Flannigan

 

To determine Development Application DA0015/14 for alterations and additions to the existing dwelling.

 

Recommendation:

 

Approval.

 

 

GB.5        35 Ivey Street, Lindfield - Extension to Rear Balcony and New Deck and Spa at Ground Floor Level                                                                                                         229

 

File: DA0344/13

 

Ward: Roseville

Applicant: Payman Tajalli

Owner: Payman Tajalli and Nina Tajalli

 

Extension to rear balcony and new deck and spa at ground floor level.

 

Recommendation:

 

Approval.

 

GB.6        6A Ignatius Road Lindfield - Construction of a Two Storey Dwelling House including Attached Secondary Dwelling, Swimming Pool and Spa                                     283

 

File: DA0318/13

 

Ward: Roseville

Applicant: Mr Brian Woods

Owner: Mr B Woods, Mrs M Woods, Mrs B Carlin

 

Construction of two storey dwelling-house with attached secondary dwelling, swimming pool and spa.

 

Recommendation:

 

Approval.

 

 

GB.7        Sustainable Event Management Policy                                                                     341

 

File: S09119

 

To seek endorsement of Council’s revised Sustainable Event Management Policy, Sustainable Event Management Plan and Sustainable Event Management Checklist. 

 

Recommendation:

 

That Council adopts the revised Sustainable Event Management Policy, Sustainable Event Management Plan and Sustainable Event Management Checklist.

  

 

Extra Reports Circulated to Meeting

 

 

BUSINESS WITHOUT NOTICE – SUBJECT TO CLAUSE 241 OF GENERAL REGULATIONS

 

 

Questions Without Notice

 

 

Inspections Committee – SETTING OF TIME, DATE AND RENDEZVOUS

 

 

** ** ** ** ** **


Minute                                           Ku-ring-gai Council                                               Page

MINUTES OF Ordinary Meeting of Council
HELD ON Tuesday, 8 April 2014

 

Present:

The Mayor, Councillor J Anderson (Chairperson) (Roseville Ward)

Councillors E Malicki & J Pettett (Comenarra Ward)

Councillors D Citer & C Szatow (Gordon Ward)

Councillor D Ossip (St Ives Ward)

Councillor D Armstrong (Roseville Ward)

Councillors C Fornari-Orsmond & D McDonald (Wahroonga Ward)

 

 

Staff Present:

General Manager (John McKee)

Director Corporate (David Marshall)

Director Development & Regulation (Michael Miocic)

Director Operations (Greg Piconi)

Acting Director Strategy & Environment (Antony Fabbro)

Acting Director Community (Virginia Leafe)

Manager Records & Governance (Matt Ryan)

Governance Officer (Lisa Guildea)

Minutes Secretary (Sigrid Banzer)

 

The Meeting commenced at 7.00pm

 

The Mayor offered the Prayer

 

 

100

Apologies

 

File: S02194

 

Councillor Christiane Berlioz tendered an apology for non-attendance [family commitment] and requested leave of absence.

 

NOTE:  The Director Community, Janice Bevan and the Director Strategy and Environment, Andrew Watson tendered apologies for non-attendance.

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Ossip/Pettett)

 

That the apology from Councillor Berlioz be accepted and leave of absence granted.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

 

The Mayor adverted to the necessity for Councillors and staff to declare a Pecuniary Interest/Conflict of Interest in any item on the Business Paper.

 

No Interest was declared.

 

 

 

Address the Council

 

The following members of the public addressed Council on items not on the Agenda:

 

M Inglis             –        Marian Street Theatre

D Castle            –        Marian Street Theatre

M McCrae         –        Future of Marian Street Theatre

S Newman        –        Future of Marian Street Theatre

B Watson          –        Gateway Determination extension letter

 

 

DOCUMENTS CIRCULATED TO COUNCILLORS

 

The Mayor adverted to the documents circulated in the Councillors’ papers and advised that the following matters would be dealt with at the appropriate time during the meeting:

 

Confidential Councillors Information:

West Pymble Pool – Confidential Memorandum and confidential attachment from Director Strategy and Environment dated 1 April 2014 in response to a Question Without Notice raised by Councillor David Armstrong at the Ordinary Meeting of Council held 25 March 2014 circulated to Councillors and General Manager ONLY.

 

 

CONFIRMATION OF MINUTEs

 

 

101

Minutes of Ordinary Meeting of Council

 

File: S02131

 

 

Meeting held 25 March 2014

Minutes numbered 83 to 99

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Szatow/Armstrong)

 

That Minutes numbered 83 to 99 circulated to Councillors were taken as read and confirmed as an accurate record of the proceedings of the Meeting.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

GENERAL BUSINESS

 

 

102

Planning Proposal for 1574 to 1578 Pacific Highway, Wahroonga

 

File: S09989

Vide: GB.6

 

 

For Council to consider a planning proposal to rezone and amend the heritage listing of land at 1574 to 1578 Pacific Highway, Wahroonga.

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Malicki/Pettett)

 

A.    That consideration of a planning proposal to rezone and amend the heritage listing of land at 1574 to 1578 Pacific Highway, Wahroonga be deferred pending a site inspection.

 

B.    That the site inspection be set at a time where the majority of Councillors can attend, including the two Ward Councillors, and that the surrounding or immediately adjacent properties also be part of that inspection.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

103

Request for Legal Assistance - Canterbury City Council

 

File: S02046/7

Vide: GB.1

 

 

To consider a request from Local Government NSW for assistance with legal costs incurred by Canterbury City Council.

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors McDonald/Ossip)

 

That Council agree to the request from Local Government NSW to contribute $611.71 towards Canterbury City Council’s incurred legal costs.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

104

The Future of Local Government Conference

 

File: S08278

Vide: GB.2

 

 

To advise Council of The Future of Local Government Conference.

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors McDonald/Armstrong)

 

That all interested Councillors advise the General Manager of their interest in attending The Future of Local Government conference by Friday, 11 April 2014.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

105

2014 SafeCity Conference

 

File: S08278

Vide: GB.3

 

 

To advise Council of the 2014 SafeCity Conference.

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors McDonald/Pettett)

 

That all interested Councillors advise the General Manager of their interest in attending the 2014 Safe City Conference by Friday, 11 April 2014.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

106

35 Water Street, Wahroonga - Alterations and Additions to Existing Building and Use as a Residential Dwelling

 

File: DA0537/13

Vide: GB.4

 

 

Alterations and additions to existing dwelling and change of use from hospital to residential.

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors McDonald/Fornari-Orsmond)

 

PURSUANT TO SECTION 80(1) OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT ACT, 1979

 

A.       THAT the Council, as the consent authority, is of the opinion that the objection under State Environmental Planning Policy No. 1 - Development Standards to the Building Height standard in clause 26ZY of the Ku-ring-gai Planning Scheme Ordinance is well founded. The Council is also of the opinion that strict compliance with the development standard is unreasonable and unnecessary in the circumstances of this case.

 

B.       THAT the Council, as the consent authority, being satisfied that the objection under SEPP No. 1 is well founded and also of the opinion that the granting of development consent to DA0537/13 is consistent with the aims of the Policy grant consent to DA 0537/13 for additions and alterations to an existing building and use of the building as a dwelling on land at 35 Water Street, Wahroonga for a period of two (2) years from the date of the Notice of Determination, subject to the following conditions:

 

Conditions that identify approved plans:

 

1.     Approved architectural plans and documentation (new development)

 

The development must be carried out in accordance with the following plans and documentation listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, except where amended by other conditions of this consent:

 

Plan no.

Drawn by

Dated

AR DA 00

TKD Architects

18.11.13

AR DA 01

TKD Architects

18.11.13

AR DA 03

TKD Architects

18.11.13

AR DA 04

TKD Architects

13.11.13

AR DA 05

TKD Architects

13.11.13

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

2.     Inconsistency between documents

 

In the event of any inconsistency between conditions of this consent and the drawings/documents referred to above, the conditions of this consent prevail.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

3.     No demolition of extra fabric

 

Alterations to, and demolition of the existing building shall be limited to that documented on the approved plans (by way of notation). No approval is given or implied for removal and/or rebuilding of any portion of the existing building which is shown to be retained.

 

Reason:    To ensure compliance with the development consent.

 

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to demolition, excavation or construction:

 

4.     Asbestos works

 

All work involving asbestos products and materials, including asbestos-cement-sheeting (ie. Fibro), must be carried out in accordance with the guidelines for asbestos work published by WorkCover Authority of NSW.

 

Reason:         To ensure public safety

 

5.     Notice of commencement

 

At least 48 hours prior to the commencement of any development (including demolition, excavation, shoring or underpinning works), a notice of commencement of building or subdivision work form and appointment of the principal certifying authority form shall be submitted to Council.

 

Reason:    Statutory requirement.

 

6.     Notification of builder’s details

 

Prior to the commencement of any development or excavation works, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be notified in writing of the name and contractor licence number of the owner/builder intending to carry out the approved works.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

7.     Dilapidation photos (public infrastructure)

 

Prior to the commencement of any works on site the applicant must submit to Ku-ring-gai Council and the Principal Certifying Authority a photographic record on the visible condition of the existing public infrastructure over the full site frontage (in colour - preferably saved to cd-rom in ‘jpg’ format). The photos must include detail of:

 

·     The existing footpath

·     The existing kerb and gutter

·     The existing full road surface between kerbs

·     The existing verge area

·     The existing driveway and layback where to be retained

·     Any existing drainage infrastructure including pits, lintels, grates.

Particular attention must be paid to accurately recording any pre-developed damaged areas on the aforementioned infrastructure so that Council is fully informed when assessing damage to public infrastructure caused as a result of the development (which is not to be repaired by the Applicant as part of the development). The developer may be held liable to all damage to public infrastructure in the vicinity of the site, where such damage is not accurately recorded and demonstrated under the requirements of this condition prior to the commencement of any works.

 

Reason:    To protect public infrastructure.

 

 

8.     Structural adequacy (alterations and additions)

 

Prior to commencement of any development or excavation works, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that that those components of the building to be retained and/or altered will be structurally sound and able to withstand the excavation and demolition process.

 

C1.     Note:  Evidence from a qualified practising structural engineer, demonstrating compliance with the above and detailing, where relevant, means of support for those parts of the retained building shall be provided to the Principal Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development can be undertaken in accordance with accepted construction practices as indicated on the endorsed development plans, without the need for modification of the consent.

 

9.     Construction and traffic management plan

 

Prior to the commencement of any works on site, the applicant must submit for review by Council's engineers a construction and traffic management plan. The following matters must be specifically addressed in the plan:

 

a.  A plan view of the entire site and frontage roadways indicating:

 

§     dedicated construction site entrances and exits, controlled by a certified traffic controller, to safely manage pedestrians and construction related vehicles in the frontage roadways

§     turning areas within the site for construction and spoil removal vehicles, allowing a forward egress for all construction vehicles on the site

§     the locations of proposed work zones in the frontage roadways

§     location of any proposed crane and concrete pump and truck standing areas on and off the site

§     a dedicated unloading and loading point within the site for all construction vehicles, plant and deliveries

§     material, plant and spoil bin storage areas within the site, where all materials are to be dropped off and collected

§     an on-site parking area for employees, tradespersons and construction vehicles as far as possible

 

b.  Traffic control plan(s) for the site

 

All traffic control plans must be in accordance with the RMS publication “Traffic Control Worksite Manual” and prepared by a suitably qualified person (minimum ‘red card’ qualification). The main stages of the development requiring specific construction management measures are to be identified and specific traffic control measures identified for each stage.

 

Approval is to be obtained from Council for any temporary road closures or crane use from public property. Applications to Council shall be made a minimum of 4 weeks prior to the activity proposed being undertaken.

 

c.  A detailed description and route map of the proposed route for vehicles involved in spoil removal, material delivery and machine floatage must be provided.

 

Light traffic roads and those subject to a load or height limit must be avoided where alternate routes exist.

 

A copy of this route is to be made available to all contractors and shall be clearly depicted at a location within the site.

 

The plan must provide evidence of RMS concurrence where construction access is provided directly from or within 20m of an arterial road.

 

The plan must provide a schedule of site inductions to be held on regular occasions and as determined necessary to ensure all new employees are aware of their construction management obligations. These must specify that construction-related vehicles are to comply with the approved requirements.

 

The plan must provide measures for minimising construction related traffic movements during school peak periods.

 

For those construction personnel that drive to the site, the applicant shall attempt to provide on-site parking so that their personnel’s vehicles do not impact on the current parking demand in the area.

 

The construction and traffic management plan shall be prepared by a suitably qualified and experienced traffic consultant and be certified by this person as being in accordance with the requirements of the abovementioned documents and the requirements of this condition. The construction management measures contained in the approved plan shall be implemented in accordance with the plan prior to the commencement of, and during, works on-site including excavation.

 

As the plan has a direct impact on the local road network, the plan shall be submitted to and reviewed by Council’s Development Engineer. Written acknowledgment from Council’s Engineer shall be obtained (attesting to this condition being appropriately satisfied) and submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the commencement of any works on site.

 

Reason:         To ensure that appropriate measures have been considered during all phases of the construction process in a manner that maintains the environmental amenity and ensures the ongoing safety and protection of people.

 

 

10.   Sediment controls

 

Prior to any work commencing on site, sediment and erosion control measures shall be installed along the contour immediately downslope of all disturbed and bare earth areas on site.

 

The form of the sediment controls to be installed on the site shall be determined by reference to the ‘NSW Department of Housing manual ‘Managing Urban Stormwater: Soils and Construction’. The erosion controls shall be maintained in an operational condition until the development activities have been completed and the site fully stabilised. Sediment shall be removed from the sediment controls following each heavy or prolonged rainfall period.

 

Reason:    To preserve and enhance the natural environment.

 

 

11.   Construction waste management plan

 

Prior to the commencement of any works, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a waste management plan, prepared by a suitably qualified person, has been prepared in accordance with Council’s DCP 40 - Construction and Demolition Waste Management.

 

The plan shall address all issues identified in DCP 40, including but not limited to: the estimated volume of waste and method for disposal for the construction and operation phases of the development.

 

Note:              The plan shall be provided to the Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:    To ensure appropriate management of construction waste.

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of the construction certificate:

 

12.   Approved works

 

The works approved pursuant of this application relate solely to the modification shown on the approved plans to the building ‘Rippon Grange’. No landscaping works, improvements to the swimming pool or any other structure is approved as part of this application. Such works will need to be considered and secured subject of separate development consent, with all references to such works deleted from the approved plans.

 

Reason:   to protect the ecological and historical values of the site.

 

13.   Modification to approved plans

 

Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate, the development plans shall be modified to delete the following notes:

·    Retain and repair pool and surrounds (dwg AR DA04 Revision A, TKD Architects, 13/11/13)

·    Landscaping to be retained and augmented with new plants and shrubs (dwg AR DA03 and DA04 Revision A, TKD Architects)

·    Removal of existing paving to the east of the house and replacement with lawn (dwg AR DA01 Revision A1, TKD Architects)

All plans subject of the Construction Certificate shall be consistent with this requirement.

Reason:   to ensure consistency of works.

 

14.   Environmental site management plan

 

Prior to the issue of any Construction Certificate, a site management plan ensuring that construction access is not permitted within the heritage garden or Blue Gum High Forest conservation areas within the property shall be prepared and submitted to Council's landscape officer for approval.

 

The site management shall include details of:

 

-      site entrance and exit and temporary access through the site in accordance with other conditions of consent and the attached marked up plan marked 'A'

-      stockpiles and site sheds in accordance with other conditions of consent

-      tree protection fencing in accordance with conditions and the attached marked up plan marked 'A'

 

The Construction Certificate shall not be issued until the Certifying Authority has written confirmation as to the adequacy of the plan. During construction works, the plan and restrictions there upon shall be strictly complied with.

 

Reason:       To protect existing heritage fabric and environmentally sensitive areas and trees during the construction phase.

 

15.   Long service levy

 

In accordance with Section 109F(i) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act a Construction Certificate shall not be issued until any long service levy payable under Section 34 of the Building and Construction Industry Long Service Payments Act 1986 (or where such levy is payable by instalments, the first instalment of the levy) has been paid. Council is authorised to accept payment. Where payment has been made elsewhere, proof of payment is to be provided to Council.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

16.   Builder’s indemnity insurance

 

The applicant, builder, developer or person who does the work on this development, must arrange builder’s indemnity insurance and submit the certificate of insurance in accordance with the requirements of Part 6 of the Home Building Act 1989 to the Certifying Authority for endorsement of the plans accompanying the Construction Certificate.

 

It is the responsibility of the applicant, builder or developer to arrange the builder's indemnity insurance for residential building work over the value of $20,000. The builder's indemnity insurance does not apply to commercial or industrial building work or to residential work valued at less than $20,000, nor to work undertaken by persons holding an owner/builder's permit issued by the Department of Fair Trading (unless the owner/builder's property is sold within 7 years of the commencement of the work).

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

17.   Certification of existing drainage system

 

Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that:

 

·     the operating condition of the existing site drainage system is of satisfactory capacity to meet the needs of the additional runoff generated by the development

·     there will be no adverse impacts on the existing, adjacent or downstream properties as a result of the continued use of the existing site drainage system

 

Note:              Evidence, including a sketch plan of the point and method of discharge for the existing stormwater drainage system from a licensed plumber, is to be provided prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate.

 

Where the existing drainage system is found to be unsatisfactory for continued use, the applicant is to submit plans and specifications for an upgraded stormwater disposal system, for approval by the Principal Certifying Authority (PCA) prior to issue of the Construction Certificate.  Plans are to be prepared by a suitably qualified and experienced consulting civil/hydraulic engineer in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Water Management Development Control Plan 47.

 

Reason:         To preserve and enhance the natural environment.

 

18.   Excavation for services

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that no proposed underground services (ie: water, sewerage, drainage, gas or other service) unless previously approved by conditions of consent, are located beneath the canopy of any tree protected under Council’s Tree Preservation Order, located on the subject allotment and adjoining allotments.

 

Note:              A plan detailing the routes of these services and trees protected under the Tree Preservation Order shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:         To ensure the protection of trees.

 

19.   Contamination

 

(a)      Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate a Phase 1 Site Investigation shall be undertaken and submitted to the Certifying Authority, along with a Remedial Action Plan and Hazardous Materials Survey if found to be required by the Phase 1 assessment. The Remedial Action Plan must be accompanied by a statement from a site auditor accredited by the Environmental Protection Agency who can issue site audit statements.

 

(b)      Upon completion of any required remediation works on the site and prior to the issue of an occupation certificate or occupation of the dwelling, a detailed Site Audit Summary Report and Site Audit Statement and Validation Report is to be submitted to the Certifying Authority. Such a site audit must be prepared in accordance with the Contaminated Land Management Act 1997 and completed by a site auditor accredited by the Environmental Protection Agency to issue site audit statements. Such a site audit must verify that the land is suitable for the proposed use.

 

Reason:   SEPP 55 requirement

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of the construction certificate or prior to demolition, excavation or construction (whichever comes first):

 

20.   Infrastructure restorations fee

 

To ensure that damage to Council Property as a result of construction activity is rectified in a timely matter:

 

a)      All work or activity taken in furtherance of the development the subject of this approval must be undertaken in a manner to avoid damage to Council Property and must not jeopardise the safety of any person using or occupying the adjacent public areas.

 

b)      The applicant, builder, developer or any person acting in reliance on this approval shall be responsible for making good any damage to Council Property, and for the removal from Council Property of any waste bin, building materials, sediment, silt, or any other material or article.

 

c)      The Infrastructure Restoration Fee must be paid to the Council by the applicant prior to both the issue of the Construction Certificate and the commencement of any earthworks or construction.

 

d)      In consideration of payment of the Infrastructure Restorations Fee, Council will undertake such inspections of Council Property as Council considers necessary and also undertake, on behalf of the applicant, such restoration work to Council Property, if any, that Council considers necessary as a consequence of the development. The provision of such restoration work by the Council does not absolve any person of the responsibilities contained in (a) to (b) above. Restoration work to be undertaken by the Council referred to in this condition is limited to work that can be undertaken by Council at a cost of not more than the Infrastructure Restorations Fee payable pursuant to this condition.

 

e)      In this condition:

 

“Council Property” includes any road, footway, footpath paving, kerbing, guttering, crossings, street furniture, seats, letter bins, trees, shrubs, lawns, mounds, bushland, and similar structures or features on any road or public road within the meaning of the Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) or any public place; and

 

“Infrastructure Restoration Fee” means the Infrastructure Restorations Fee calculated in accordance with the Schedule of Fees & Charges adopted by Council as at the date of payment and the cost of any inspections required by the Council of Council Property associated with this condition.

 

Reason:    To maintain public infrastructure.

 

21.   Temporary groundcover

 

Prior to building works commencing, all existing disturbed and bare earth areas on site shall be treated with a cover of mulch or treated with a dense cover crop utilising sterile/non seed-setting species. Such stabilisation shall be semi-permanent and remain in place until more formal landscaping works are undertaken.

 

Reason:    To protect the environment

 

22.   Tree protective fencing type galvanised mesh

 

The tree protection fencing shall be constructed of galvanised pipe at 2.4 metres spacing and connected by securely attached chain mesh fencing to a minimum height of 1.8 metres in height prior to work commencing.

 

Reason:   To protect existing trees during construction phase.

 

23.   Tree protection signage

 

Prior to works commencing, tree protection signage is to be attached to each tree protection zone, displayed in a prominent position and the sign repeated at 10 metres intervals or closer where the fence changes direction. Each sign shall contain in a clearly legible form, the following information:

 

    tree protection zone

 

    this fence has been installed to prevent damage to the trees and their growing environment both above and below ground and access is restricted

 

    any encroachment not previously approved within the tree protection zone shall be the subject of an arborist's report

 

    the arborist's report shall provide proof that no other alternative is available

 

    the arborist's report shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority for further consultation with Council

 

    The name, address, and telephone number of the developer.

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees during the construction phase.

 

24.   Tree fencing inspection

 

Upon installation of the required tree protection measures, an inspection of the site by the Principal Certifying Authority is required to verify that tree protection measures comply with all relevant conditions.

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees during the construction phase.

 

Conditions to be satisfied during the demolition, excavation and construction phases:

 

25.   Road opening permit

 

The opening of any footway, roadway, road shoulder or any part of the road reserve shall not be carried out without a road opening permit being obtained from Council (upon payment of the required fee) beforehand.

 

Reason:       Statutory requirement (Roads Act 1993 Section 138) and to maintain the integrity of Council’s infrastructure.

 

26.   Prescribed conditions

 

The applicant shall comply with any relevant prescribed conditions of development consent under clause 98 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation. For the purposes of section 80A (11) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, the following conditions are prescribed in relation to a development consent for development that involves any building work:

 

·     The work must be carried out in accordance with the requirements of the Building Code of Australia

·     In the case of residential building work for which the Home Building Act 1989 requires there to be a contract of insurance in force in accordance with Part 6 of that Act, that such a contract of insurance is in force before any works commence.

 

Reason:      Statutory requirement.

 

27.   Hours of work

 

Demolition, excavation, construction work and deliveries of building material and equipment must not take place outside the hours of 7.00am to 5.00pm Monday to Friday and 8.00am to 12 noon Saturday. No work and no deliveries are to take place on Sundays and public holidays.

 

Excavation or removal of any materials using machinery of any kind, including compressors and jack hammers, must be limited to between 7.30am and 5.00pm Monday to Friday, with a respite break of 45 minutes between 12 noon 1.00pm.

 

Where it is necessary for works to occur outside of these hours (ie) placement of concrete for large floor areas on large residential/commercial developments or where building processes require the use of oversized trucks and/or cranes that are restricted by the RMS from travelling during daylight hours to deliver, erect or remove machinery, tower cranes, pre-cast panels, beams, tanks or service equipment to or from the site, approval for such activities will be subject to the issue of an "outside of hours works permit" from Council as well as notification of the surrounding properties likely to be affected by the proposed works.

 

Note:              Failure to obtain a permit to work outside of the approved hours will result in on the spot fines being issued.

 

Reason:         To ensure reasonable standards of amenity for occupants of neighbouring properties.

 

28.   Heritage conservation advice

 

During the construction works, the conservation architects involved in the application shall be retained to provide on-site advice to the applicant and contractors in making decisions on how the actual works are to be carried out.

 

Reason:       To protect the heritage significance of the building and ensure the new work is appropriate and does not obscure significant fabric.

 

29.   Builders vehicles

 

All builders vehicles, deliveries and the like shall be located and undertaken within the boundaries of the site at all times. No related vehicles shall be parked in the surrounding street network.

 

Reason:      To protect the amenity of surrounding residents.

 

30.   Future landscaping works

 

No landscaping works are approved as part of this application (other than those works necessary to stabilise the disturbed parts of the site). Any landscaping works on site other than incidental maintenance shall be undertaken without separate development consent being first obtained from Council.

 

Reason:       To protect the ecological and heritage significance of the site.

 

31.   MP07_0151 works

 

No further landscaping works, building works or tree removal to those already undertaken which are facilitated under MP07_0151 shall be undertaken without Council's prior written approval.

 

Reason:       To protect the ecological and heritage significance of the site.

 

32.   Approved plans to be on site

 

A copy of all approved and certified plans, specifications and documents incorporating conditions of consent and certification (including the Construction Certificate if required for the work) shall be kept on site at all times during the demolition, excavation and construction phases and must be readily available to any officer of Council or the Principal Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

33.   Statement of compliance with Australian Standards

 

The demolition work shall comply with the provisions of Australian Standard AS2601: 2001 The Demolition of Structures. The work plans required by AS2601: 2001 shall be accompanied by a written statement from a suitably qualified person that the proposal contained in the work plan comply with the safety requirements of the Standard. The work plan and the statement of compliance shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the commencement of any works.

 

Reason:         To ensure compliance with the Australian Standards.

 

34.   Site notice

 

A site notice shall be erected on the site prior to any work commencing and shall be displayed throughout the works period.

 

The site notice must:

 

·          be prominently displayed at the boundaries of the site for the purposes of informing the public that unauthorised entry to the site is not permitted

·          display project details including, but not limited to the details of the builder, Principal Certifying Authority and structural engineer

·          be durable and weatherproof

·          display the approved hours of work, the name of the site/project manager, the responsible managing company (if any), its address and 24 hour contact phone number for any inquiries, including construction/noise complaint are to be displayed on the site notice

·          be mounted at eye level on the perimeter hoardings/fencing and is to state that unauthorised entry to the site is not permitted

 

Reason:         To ensure public safety and public information.

 

 

35.   Use of road or footpath

 

During excavation, demolition and construction phases, no building materials, plant or the like are to be stored on the road or footpath without written approval being obtained from Council beforehand.  The pathway shall be kept in a clean, tidy and safe condition during building operations.  Council reserves the right, without notice, to rectify any such breach and to charge the cost against the applicant/owner/builder, as the case may be.

 

Reason:         To ensure safety and amenity of the area.

 

36.   Toilet facilities

 

During excavation, demolition and construction phases, toilet facilities are to be provided, on the work site, at the rate of one toilet for every 20 persons or part of 20 persons employed at the site.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

 

37.   Recycling of building material (general)

 

During demolition and construction, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that building materials suitable for recycling have been forwarded to an appropriate registered business dealing in recycling of materials. Materials to be recycled must be kept in good order.

 

Reason:         To facilitate recycling of materials.

 

 

38.   Road reserve safety

 

All public footways and roadways fronting and adjacent to the site must be maintained in a safe condition at all times during the course of the development works. Construction materials must not be stored in the road reserve. A safe pedestrian circulation route and a pavement/route free of trip hazards must be maintained at all times on or adjacent to any public access ways fronting the construction site.  Where public infrastructure is damaged, repair works must be carried out when and as directed by Council officers. Where pedestrian circulation is diverted on to the roadway or verge areas, clear directional signage and protective barricades must be installed in accordance with AS1742-3 (1996) “Traffic Control Devices for Work on Roads”. If pedestrian circulation is not satisfactorily maintained across the site frontage, and action is not taken promptly to rectify the defects, Council may undertake proceedings to stop work.

 

Reason:         To ensure safe public footways and roadways during construction.

 

 

39.   Drainage to existing system

 

Stormwater runoff from all new impervious areas and subsoil drainage systems shall be piped to the existing site drainage system. The installation of new drainage components must be completed by a licensed contractor in accordance with AS3500.3 (Plumbing Code) and the BCA. No stormwater runoff is to be placed into the Sydney Water sewer system. If an illegal sewer connection is found during construction, the drainage system must be rectified to the satisfaction of Council and Sydney Water.

 

Reason:         To protect the environment.

 

40.   No storage of materials beneath trees

 

No activities, storage or disposal of materials shall take place beneath the canopy of any tree protected under Council's Tree Preservation Order at any time.

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees.

 

 

41.   Removal of refuse

 

All builders' refuse, spoil and/or material unsuitable for use in landscape areas shall be removed from the site on completion of the building works.

 

Reason:         To protect the environment.

 

 

42.   On site retention of waste dockets

 

All demolition, excavation and construction waste dockets are to be retained on site, or at suitable location, in order to confirm which facility received materials generated from the site for recycling or disposal.

 

·          Each docket is to be an official receipt from a facility authorised to accept the material type, for disposal or processing.

·          This information is to be made available at the request of an Authorised Officer of Council.

 

Reason:       To protect the environment.

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate:

 

43.   Compliance with BASIX Certificate

 

Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that all commitments listed in BASIX Certificate No. A175144 have been complied with.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

44.   Infrastructure repair

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority must be satisfied that any damaged public infrastructure caused as a result of construction works (including damage caused by, but not limited to, delivery vehicles, waste collection, contractors, sub-contractors, concrete vehicles) is fully repaired to the satisfaction of Council Development Engineer and at no cost to Council.

 

Reason:         To protect public infrastructure.

 

45.   Surrender of Major Project MP07_0151

 

Prior to the issue of any Occupation Certificate or occupation of the building, the Minister's Consent MP07_0151 shall be surrendered in accordance with Section 8P of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000. Written confirmation of this surrender shall be provided to the Certifying Authority prior to any Occupation Certificate being issued or occupation of the building. Once surrendered, no works associated with that approval shall be undertaken.

 

Reason:   To ensure orderly development of the land.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

107

23 Redfield Road, East Killara - Alterations and Additions to the Existing Dwelling including Replacement of Driveway, Internal Alterations, Addition of Awning to Existing Balcony and Landscaping

 

File: DA0424/13

Vide: GB.5

 

 

Alterations and additions to the existing dwelling including replacement of driveway, internal alterations, addition of awning to existing balcony and landscaping at 23 Redfield Road, East Killara.

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors McDonald/Szatow)

 

PURSUANT TO SECTION 80(1) OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT ACT, 1979

 

THAT the Council, as the consent authority, is of the opinion that the objection under State Environmental Planning Policy No. 1 – Development Standards to the building height standard in clause 46 of the Ku-ring-gai Planning Scheme Ordinance is well founded.  The Council is also of the opinion that strict compliance with the development standard is unreasonable and unnecessary in the circumstances of this case.

 

AND

 

THAT the Council, as the consent authority, being satisfied that the objection under SEPP No. 1 is well founded and also being of the opinion that the granting of consent to DA0424/13 is consistent with the aims of the Policy, grant development consent to DA0424/13 for alterations and additions including replacement of driveway, internal alterations, addition of awning to existing balcony and landscaping on land at 23 Redfield Road East Killara, for a period of two (2) years from the date of the Notice of Determination, subject to the following conditions:

 

CONDITIONS THAT IDENTIFY APPROVED PLANS:

 

1.     Approved architectural plans and documentation (new development)

 

The development must be carried out in accordance with work shown in colour on the following plans and documentation listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, except where amended by other conditions of this consent.

 

Plan no.

Drawn by

Dated

32603A01.DWG Rev A Survey

Degotardi, Smith & Partners

10/08/10

1201-G-A01 Issue 1 General notes & drawing schedule

Noosalutions

01/08/13

1201-P-A01 Issue 1 Site analysis

Noosalutions

01/08/13

1201-P-A02 Issue 2 Site plan

Noosalutions

10/02/14

1201-P-G01-G02 Issue 1 Ground floor plans - existing

Noosalutions

01/08/13

1201-P-101-102 Issue 1 First floor plans

Noosalutions

01/08/13

1201-P-103 Issue 1 Garage parking clearances

Noosalutions

01/08/13

1201-P-201-202 Issue 1 Second floor plans

Noosalutions

01/08/13

1201-P-R01-R02 Issue 1 Roof floor plans

Noosalutions

01/08/13

1201-E-A01-A04 Issue 1 Elevations

Noosalutions

01/08/13

1201-E-A06 Issue 1 Gazebo elevation

Noosalutions

01/08/13

1201-E-A07 Issue 1 Pool & fencing detail

Noosalutions

06/02/14

1201-S-A01 Issue 1 Building section

Noosalutions

30/11/12

L001 Rev E Landscape plan

Peta Gilliland Landscape Design

07/02/14

C01 Rev B Driveway plan & sections

Northern Beaches Consulting Engineers Pty Ltd

14/12/12

D01 Rev B Stormwater management plan & details

Northern Beaches Consulting Engineers Pty Ltd

14/12/12

 

Document(s)

Dated

Letter from RFS

22 January 2014

BASIX certificate No. A85522_03

05 September 2013

Arborist report, Glenice Buck Designs Pty Ltd

15 October 2013

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

2.     Inconsistency between documents

 

In the event of any inconsistency between conditions of this consent and the drawings/documents referred to above, the conditions of this consent prevail.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

3.     Approved landscape plans

 

Landscape works shall be carried out in accordance with the following landscape plan(s), listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, except where amended by other conditions of this consent:

 

Plan no.

Drawn by

Dated

L001- E

Peta Gilliland

4/05/13

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

 

4.     No demolition of extra fabric

 

Alterations to, and demolition of the existing building shall be limited to that documented on the approved plans (by way of notation). No approval is given or implied for removal and/or rebuilding of any portion of the existing building which is shown to be retained.

 

Reason:         To ensure compliance with the development consent.

 

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to demolition, excavation or construction:

 

5.     Asbestos works

 

All work involving asbestos products and materials, including asbestos-cement-sheeting (ie. Fibro), must be carried out in accordance with the guidelines for asbestos work published by WorkCover Authority of NSW.

 

Reason:         To ensure public safety.

 

6.     Notice of commencement

 

At least 48 hours prior to the commencement of any development (including demolition, excavation, shoring or underpinning works), a notice of commencement of building or subdivision work form and appointment of the principal certifying authority form shall be submitted to Council.

 

Reason:    Statutory requirement.

 

7.     Notification of builder’s details

 

Prior to the commencement of any development or excavation works, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be notified in writing of the name and contractor licence number of the owner/builder intending to carry out the approved works.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

8.     Structural adequacy (alterations and additions)

 

Prior to commencement of any development or excavation works, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that that those components of the building to be retained and/or altered will be structurally sound and able to withstand the excavation and demolition process.

 

 

C1.   Note:    Evidence from a qualified practising structural engineer, demonstrating compliance with the above and detailing, where relevant, means of support for those parts of the retained building shall be provided to the Principal Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development can be undertaken in accordance with accepted construction practices as indicated on the endorsed development plans, without the need for modification of the consent.

 

 

9.     Access through public reserve not permitted

 

Access for construction purposes shall not be gained through the adjoining public reserve.  Should no alternative access exist, an application for access to the construction site via the public reserve shall be submitted to Council for consideration and approval prior to the commencement of works.

 

Reason:         To protect public reserves.

 

10.   Construction waste management plan

 

Prior to the commencement of any works, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a waste management plan, prepared by a suitably qualified person, has been prepared in accordance with Council’s DCP 40 - Construction and Demolition Waste Management.

 

The plan shall address all issues identified in DCP 40, including but not limited to: the estimated volume of waste and method for disposal for the construction and operation phases of the development.

 

Note:    The plan shall be provided to the Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:         To ensure appropriate management of construction waste.

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of the construction certificate:

 

11.   Long service levy

 

In accordance with Section 109F(i) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act a Construction Certificate shall not be issued until any long service levy payable under Section 34 of the Building and Construction Industry Long Service Payments Act 1986 (or where such levy is payable by instalments, the first instalment of the levy) has been paid. Council is authorised to accept payment. Where payment has been made elsewhere, proof of payment is to be provided to Council.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

12.   Builder’s indemnity insurance

 

The applicant, builder, developer or person who does the work on this development, must arrange builder’s indemnity insurance and submit the certificate of insurance in accordance with the requirements of Part 6 of the Home Building Act 1989 to the Certifying Authority for endorsement of the plans accompanying the Construction Certificate.

 

It is the responsibility of the applicant, builder or developer to arrange the builder's indemnity insurance for residential building work over the value of $20,000. The builder's indemnity insurance does not apply to commercial or industrial building work or to residential work valued at less than $20,000, nor to work undertaken by persons holding an owner/builder's permit issued by the Department of Fair Trading (unless the owner/builder's property is sold within 7 years of the commencement of the work).

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

13.   Stormwater details (alts and additions where rainwater tanks required)

 

Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, the applicant must submit, for approval by the Principal Certifying Authority, details in relation to stormwater management and disposal for the approved development. The following must be included:

 

(i)         Schedule of new drainage system components required to comply with AS3500.3 - (2003) Plumbing Code. This would typically nominate guttering and downpipe sizes and specifications, pipe and pit sizes for new drainage lines and show the location of these by way of sketch on the architectural plans issued for construction purposes.

 

(ii)        A plan showing the location(s) of the required rainwater storage tank(s) (of minimum volume 839 litres) with manufacturer details and specifications provided for proprietary products. The design and citing of rainwater tanks shall be in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Water Management Development Control Plan No. 47, Appendix 6. For every 5000 litres of tank storage provided, at least 100m2 of roof area must drain to the rainwater tank system so that it has an adequate rainwater supply.

 

(iii)       The specifications for any pumping facilities so that retained water may be used for household purposes as required.

 

(iv)       A sketch plan showing the location of any new connection points to the public drainage system where proposed (e.g. at kerb, table drain, in ground pits or pipes) for Council records.

 

The details may be prepared by either a licensed plumber with experience in the installation of domestic stormwater systems or a qualified civil/hydraulic engineer. The scope of detail required shall be at the discretion of the Principal Certifying Authority having regard to ensuring that the new stormwater disposal and management systems are installed in accordance with the relevant plumbing codes, guidelines and the Building Code of Australia.

 

Reason:         To ensure that stormwater disposal and management systems are installed in accordance with the relevant plumbing codes, guidelines and the Building Code of Australia.

 

14.   Excavation for services

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that no proposed underground services (ie: water, sewerage, drainage, gas or other service) unless previously approved by conditions of consent, are located beneath the canopy of any tree protected under Council’s Tree Preservation Order, located on the subject allotment and adjoining allotments.

 

Note:             A plan detailing the routes of these services and trees protected under the Tree Preservation Order shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:         To ensure the protection of trees.

 

15.   Landscape plan

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a landscape plan has been completed in accordance with Council’s DA Guide, relevant development control plans and the conditions of consent by a Landscape Architect or qualified Landscape Designer.

 

Note:             The Landscape Plan must be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:         To ensure adequate landscaping of the site.

 

16.   Driveway crossing levels

 

Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, driveway and associated footpath levels for any new, reconstructed or extended sections of driveway crossings between the property boundary and road alignment must be obtained from Ku-ring-gai Council. Such levels are only able to be issued by Council under the Roads Act 1993.  All footpath crossings, laybacks and driveways are to be constructed according to Council's specifications "Construction of Gutter Crossings and Footpath Crossings".

 

Specifications are issued with alignment levels after completing the necessary application form at Customer Services and payment of the assessment fee. When completing the request for driveway levels application from Council, the applicant must attach a copy of the relevant development application drawing which indicates the position and proposed level of the proposed driveway at the boundary alignment.

 

This development consent is for works wholly within the property. Development consent does not imply approval of footpath or driveway levels, materials or location within the road reserve, regardless of whether this information is shown on the development application plans. The grading of such footpaths or driveways outside the property shall comply with Council's standard requirements.  The suitability of the grade of such paths or driveways inside the property is the sole responsibility of the applicant and the required alignment levels fixed by Council may impact upon these levels.

 

The construction of footpaths and driveways outside the property in materials other than those approved by Council is not permitted.

 

Reason:         To provide suitable vehicular access without disruption to pedestrian and vehicular traffic.

 

17.   Vehicular access and garaging

 

Driveways and vehicular access ramps must be designed not to scrape the underside of cars. In all respects, the proposed vehicle access and accommodation arrangements must be designed and constructed to comply with Australian Standard 2890.1 - 2004 “Off-Street car parking”. Details are to be provided to and approved by the Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate.

 

Reason:         To ensure that parking spaces are in accordance with the approved development.

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of the construction certificate or prior to demolition, excavation or construction (whichever comes first):

 

18.   Infrastructure restorations fee

 

To ensure that damage to Council Property as a result of construction activity is rectified in a timely matter:

 

a)      All work or activity taken in furtherance of the development the subject of this approval must be undertaken in a manner to avoid damage to Council Property and must not jeopardise the safety of any person using or occupying the adjacent public areas.

 

b)      The applicant, builder, developer or any person acting in reliance on this approval shall be responsible for making good any damage to Council Property, and for the removal from Council Property of any waste bin, building materials, sediment, silt, or any other material or article.

 

c)      The Infrastructure Restoration Fee must be paid to the Council by the applicant prior to both the issue of the Construction Certificate and the commencement of any earthworks or construction.

 

d)      In consideration of payment of the Infrastructure Restorations Fee, Council will undertake such inspections of Council Property as Council considers necessary and also undertake, on behalf of the applicant, such restoration work to Council Property, if any, that Council considers necessary as a consequence of the development. The provision of such restoration work by the Council does not absolve any person of the responsibilities contained in (a) to (b) above. Restoration work to be undertaken by the Council referred to in this condition is limited to work that can be undertaken by Council at a cost of not more than the Infrastructure Restorations Fee payable pursuant to this condition.

 

e)      In this condition:

 

“Council Property” includes any road, footway, footpath paving, kerbing, guttering, crossings, street furniture, seats, letter bins, trees, shrubs, lawns, mounds, bushland, and similar structures or features on any road or public road within the meaning of the Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) or any public place; and

 

“Infrastructure Restoration Fee” means the Infrastructure Restorations Fee calculated in accordance with the Schedule of Fees & Charges adopted by Council as at the date of payment and the cost of any inspections required by the Council of Council Property associated with this condition.

 

Reason:         To maintain public infrastructure.

 

Conditions to be satisfied during the demolition, excavation and construction phases:

 

19.   Road opening permit

 

The opening of any footway, roadway, road shoulder or any part of the road reserve shall not be carried out without a road opening permit being obtained from Council (upon payment of the required fee) beforehand.

 

Reason:       Statutory requirement (Roads Act 1993 Section 138) and to maintain the integrity of Council’s infrastructure.

 

20.   Prescribed conditions

 

The applicant shall comply with any relevant prescribed conditions of development consent under clause 98 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation. For the purposes of section 80A (11) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, the following conditions are prescribed in relation to a development consent for development that involves any building work:

 

·        The work must be carried out in accordance with the requirements of the Building Code of Australia

·        In the case of residential building work for which the Home Building Act 1989 requires there to be a contract of insurance in force in accordance with Part 6 of that Act, that such a contract of insurance is in force before any works commence.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

21.   Hours of work

 

Demolition, excavation, construction work and deliveries of building material and equipment must not take place outside the hours of 7.00am to 5.00pm Monday to Friday and 8.00am to 12 noon Saturday. No work and no deliveries are to take place on Sundays and public holidays.

 

Excavation or removal of any materials using machinery of any kind, including compressors and jack hammers, must be limited to between 7.30am and 5.00pm Monday to Friday, with a respite break of 45 minutes between 12 noon 1.00pm.

 

Where it is necessary for works to occur outside of these hours (ie) placement of concrete for large floor areas on large residential/commercial developments or where building processes require the use of oversized trucks and/or cranes that are restricted by the RTA from travelling during daylight hours to deliver, erect or remove machinery, tower cranes, pre-cast panels, beams, tanks or service equipment to or from the site, approval for such activities will be subject to the issue of an "outside of hours works permit" from Council as well as notification of the surrounding properties likely to be affected by the proposed works.

 

Note:              Failure to obtain a permit to work outside of the approved hours will result in on the spot fines being issued.

 

Reason:         To ensure reasonable standards of amenity for occupants of neighbouring properties.

 

22.   Approved plans to be on site

 

A copy of all approved and certified plans, specifications and documents incorporating conditions of consent and certification (including the Construction Certificate if required for the work) shall be kept on site at all times during the demolition, excavation and construction phases and must be readily available to any officer of Council or the Principal Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

23.   Statement of compliance with Australian Standards

 

The demolition work shall comply with the provisions of Australian Standard AS2601: 2001 The Demolition of Structures. The work plans required by AS2601: 2001 shall be accompanied by a written statement from a suitably qualified person that the proposal contained in the work plan comply with the safety requirements of the Standard. The work plan and the statement of compliance shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the commencement of any works.

 

Reason:         To ensure compliance with the Australian Standards.

 

24.   Site notice

 

A site notice shall be erected on the site prior to any work commencing and shall be displayed throughout the works period.

 

The site notice must:

 

·        be prominently displayed at the boundaries of the site for the purposes of informing the public that unauthorised entry to the site is not permitted

·        display project details including, but not limited to the details of the builder, Principal Certifying Authority and structural engineer

·        be durable and weatherproof

·        display the approved hours of work, the name of the site/project manager, the responsible managing company (if any), its address and 24 hour contact phone number for any inquiries, including construction/noise complaint are to be displayed on the site notice

·        be mounted at eye level on the perimeter hoardings/fencing and is to state that unauthorised entry to the site is not permitted

 

Reason:         To ensure public safety and public information.

 

25.   Dust control

 

During excavation, demolition and construction, adequate measures shall be taken to prevent dust from affecting the amenity of the neighbourhood. The following measures must be adopted:

 

·        physical barriers shall be erected at right angles to the prevailing wind direction or shall be placed around or over dust sources to prevent wind or activity from generating dust

·        earthworks and scheduling activities shall be managed to coincide with the next stage of development to minimise the amount of time the site is left cut or exposed

·        all materials shall be stored or stockpiled at the best locations

·        the ground surface should be dampened slightly to prevent dust from becoming airborne but should not be wet to the extent that run-off occurs

·        all vehicles carrying spoil or rubble to or from the site shall at all times be covered to prevent the escape of dust

·        all equipment wheels shall be washed before exiting the site using manual or automated sprayers and drive-through washing bays

·        gates shall be closed between vehicle movements and shall be fitted with shade cloth

·        cleaning of footpaths and roadways shall be carried out daily

 

Reason:         To protect the environment and amenity of surrounding properties.

 

26.   Use of road or footpath

 

During excavation, demolition and construction phases, no building materials, plant or the like are to be stored on the road or footpath without written approval being obtained from Council beforehand.  The pathway shall be kept in a clean, tidy and safe condition during building operations.  Council reserves the right, without notice, to rectify any such breach and to charge the cost against the applicant/owner/builder, as the case may be.

 

Reason:         To ensure safety and amenity of the area.

 

27.   Guarding excavations

 

All excavation, demolition and construction works shall be properly guarded and protected with hoardings or fencing to prevent them from being dangerous to life and property.

 

Reason:         To ensure public safety.

 

28.   Toilet facilities

 

During excavation, demolition and construction phases, toilet facilities are to be provided, on the work site, at the rate of one toilet for every 20 persons or part of 20 persons employed at the site.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

29.   Protection of public places

 

If the work involved in the erection, demolition or construction of the development is likely to cause pedestrian or vehicular traffic in a public place to be obstructed or rendered inconvenient, or building involves the enclosure of a public place, a hoarding or fence must be erected between the work site and the public place.

 

If necessary, a hoarding is to be erected, sufficient to prevent any substance from, or in connection with, the work falling into the public place.

 

The work site must be kept lit between sunset and sunrise if it is likely to be hazardous to persons in the public place.

 

Any hoarding, fence or awning is to be removed when the work has been completed.

 

Reason:         To protect public places.

 

30.   Recycling of building material (general)

 

During demolition and construction, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that building materials suitable for recycling have been forwarded to an appropriate registered business dealing in recycling of materials. Materials to be recycled must be kept in good order.

 

Reason:         To facilitate recycling of materials.

 

31.   Construction signage

 

All construction signs must comply with the following requirements:

 

·        are not to cover any mechanical ventilation inlet or outlet vent

·        are not illuminated, self-illuminated or flashing at any time

·        are located wholly within a property where construction is being undertaken

·        refer only to the business(es) undertaking the construction and/or the site at which the construction is being undertaken

·        are restricted to one such sign per property

·        do not exceed 2.5m2

·        are removed within 14 days of the completion of all construction works

 

Reason:         To ensure compliance with Council's controls regarding signage.

 

32.   Road reserve safety

 

All public footways and roadways fronting and adjacent to the site must be maintained in a safe condition at all times during the course of the development works. Construction materials must not be stored in the road reserve. A safe pedestrian circulation route and a pavement/route free of trip hazards must be maintained at all times on or adjacent to any public access ways fronting the construction site.  Where public infrastructure is damaged, repair works must be carried out when and as directed by Council officers. Where pedestrian circulation is diverted on to the roadway or verge areas, clear directional signage and protective barricades must be installed in accordance with AS1742-3 (1996) “Traffic Control Devices for Work on Roads”. If pedestrian circulation is not satisfactorily maintained across the site frontage, and action is not taken promptly to rectify the defects, Council may undertake proceedings to stop work.

 

Reason:         To ensure safe public footways and roadways during construction.

 

33.   Services

 

Where required, the adjustment or inclusion of any new utility service facilities must be carried out by the applicant and in accordance with the requirements of the relevant utility authority. These works shall be at no cost to Council. It is the applicants’ full responsibility to make contact with the relevant utility authorities to ascertain the impacts of the proposal upon utility services (including water, phone, gas and the like). Council accepts no responsibility for any matter arising from its approval to this application involving any influence upon utility services provided by another authority.

 

Reason:         Provision of utility services.

 

34.   Structures to be clear of drainage easements

 

During all phases of demolition, excavation and construction, it is the full responsibility of the applicant and their contractors to:

 

·        ascertain the exact location of the Council drainage pipe traversing the site in the vicinity of the works

·        take full measures to protect the in-ground Council drainage system

·        ensure dedicated overland flow paths are satisfactorily maintained through the site

 

Drainage pipes can be damaged through applying excessive loading (such as construction machinery, material storage and the like). All proposed structures and construction activities are to be sited fully clear of Council drainage pipes, drainage easements, watercourses and trunk overland flow paths on the site. Trunk or dedicated overland flow paths must not be impeded or diverted by fill or structures unless otherwise approved. 

 

If a Council drainage pipeline is uncovered during construction, all work is to cease and the Principal Certifying Authority and Council must be contacted immediately for advice. Any damage caused to a Council drainage system must be immediately repaired in full as directed and at no cost to Council.

 

Reason:         To protect existing Council infrastructure and maintain over land flow paths.

 

35.   Erosion control

 

Temporary sediment and erosion control and measures are to be installed prior to the commencement of any works on the site. These measures must be maintained in working order during construction works up to completion. All sediment traps must be cleared on a regular basis and after each major storm and/or as directed by the Principal Certifying Authority and Council officers.

 

Reason:         To protect the environment from erosion and sedimentation.

 

 

36.   Drainage to existing system

 

Stormwater runoff from all new impervious areas and subsoil drainage systems shall be piped to the existing site drainage system. The installation of new drainage components must be completed by a licensed contractor in accordance with AS3500.3 (Plumbing Code) and the BCA. No stormwater runoff is to be placed into the Sydney Water sewer system. If an illegal sewer connection is found during construction, the drainage system must be rectified to the satisfaction of Council and Sydney Water.

 

Reason:         To protect the environment.

 

 

37.   Grated drain at garage

 

A 200mm wide grated channel/trench drain, with a heavy-duty removable galvanised grate is to be provided in front of the garage door/basement parking slab to collect driveway runoff. The channel drain shall be connected to the main drainage system and must have an outlet of minimum diameter 150mm to prevent blockage by silt and debris.

 

Reason:         Stormwater control.

 

38.   Approved tree works

 

Approval is given for the following works to be undertaken to trees on the site:

 

Schedule

Tree/Location

Approved tree works

As indicated on the approved Landscape plan by Peta Gilliland LA001-E

removal

 

Removal or pruning of any other tree on the site is not approved, excluding species exempt under Council’s Tree Preservation Order.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

39.   No storage of materials beneath trees

 

No activities, storage or disposal of materials shall take place beneath the canopy of any tree protected under Council's Tree Preservation Order at any time.

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees.

 

40.   Removal of refuse

 

All builders' refuse, spoil and/or material unsuitable for use in landscape areas shall be removed from the site on completion of the building works.

 

Reason:         To protect the environment.

 

41.   Canopy replenishment trees to be planted

 

The canopy replenishment trees to be planted shall be maintained in a healthy and vigorous condition until they attain a height of 5.0 metres whereby they will be protected by Council’s Tree Preservation Order.  Any of the trees found faulty, damaged, dying or dead shall be replaced with the same species.

 

Reason:         To maintain the treed character of the area.

 

42.   Removal of noxious plants & weeds

 

All noxious and/or environmental weed species shall be removed from the property prior to completion of building works.

 

Reason:         To protect the environment.

 

43.   On site retention of waste dockets

 

All demolition, excavation and construction waste dockets are to be retained on site, or at suitable location, in order to confirm which facility received materials generated from the site for recycling or disposal.

 

·        Each docket is to be an official receipt from a facility authorised to accept the material type, for disposal or processing.

·        This information is to be made available at the request of an Authorised Officer of Council.

 

Reason:       To protect the environment.

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate:

 

44.   Compliance with BASIX Certificate

 

Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that all commitments listed in BASIX Certificate No. A85522_03 and dated 05 September 2013 have been complied with.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

45.   Completion of landscape works

 

Prior to the release of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that all landscape works, including the removal of all noxious and/or environmental weed species, have been undertaken in accordance with the approved plan(s) and conditions of consent.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the landscape works are consistent with the development consent.

 

46.   Certification of drainage works (alterations/additions)

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that:

 

·        the components of the new drainage system have been installed by a licensed contractor in accordance with the National Plumbing and Drainage Code AS3500.3 (2003) and the Building Code of Australia

·        the stormwater drainage works have been completed in accordance with the approved Construction Certificate drainage plans, the nominated BASIX commitments and Ku-ring-gai Water Management DCP 47

 

Note:             Evidence from the plumbing contractor or a qualified civil/hydraulic engineer confirming compliance with this control is to be provided to Council prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate.

 

Reason:         To protect the environment.

 

47.   Reinstatement of redundant crossings and completion of infrastructure

        works

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority must be satisfied that he or she has received a signed inspection form from Council which states that the following works in the road reserve have been completed:

 

·        new concrete driveway crossing in accordance with levels and specifications issued by Council

·        removal of all redundant driveway crossings and kerb laybacks (or sections thereof) and reinstatement of these areas to footpath, turfed verge and upright kerb and gutter (reinstatement works to match surrounding adjacent infrastructure with respect to integration of levels and materials)

·        full repair and resealing of any road surface damaged during construction

·        full replacement of damaged sections of grass verge to match existing

 

This inspection may not be carried out by the Private Certifier because restoration of Council property outside the boundary of the site is not a matter listed in Clause 161 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000.

 

All works must be completed in accordance with the General Specification for the Construction of Road and Drainage Works in Ku-ring-gai Council, dated November 2004. The Occupation Certificate must not be issued until all damaged public infrastructure caused as a result of construction works on the subject site (including damage caused by, but not limited to, delivery vehicles, waste collection, contractors, sub-contractors, concrete vehicles) is fully repaired to the satisfaction of Council. Repair works shall be at no cost to Council.

 

Reason:         To protect the streetscape.

 

48.   Infrastructure repair

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority must be satisfied that any damaged public infrastructure caused as a result of construction works (including damage caused by, but not limited to, delivery vehicles, waste collection, contractors, sub-contractors, concrete vehicles) is fully repaired to the satisfaction of Council Development Engineer and at no cost to Council.

 

Reason:         To protect public infrastructure.

 

49.   Swimming pool (part 1)

 

Prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that:

 

C1   1.  Access to the pool/spa shall be restricted by a child resistant barrier in accordance with the regulations prescribed in the Swimming Pools Act, 1992:

 

(a)     The pool shall not be filled with water or be allowed to collect stormwater until the child resistant barrier is installed; and

 

(b)     The barrier is to conform to the requirements of AS 1926-1 2012 Fences and Gates for Private Swimming Pools.

 

Reason:         To ensure the safety of children.

 

2.       Any mechanical equipment associated with the swimming pool and/or spa pool shall be located in a sound-attenuating enclosure. The Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the sound levels associated with the swimming pool/spa filtration system and associated mechanical equipment do not exceed 5dB(A) above the background noise level at the boundaries of the site.

 

Reason:         To protect the amenity of surrounding properties.

 

Conditions to be satisfied at all times:

 

50.   Outdoor lighting

 

At all times for the life of the approved development, all outdoor lighting shall not detrimentally impact upon the amenity of other premises and adjacent dwellings and shall comply with, where relevant, AS/NZ1158.3: 1999 Pedestrian Area (Category P) Lighting and AS4282: 1997 Control of the Obtrusive Effects of Outdoor Lighting.

 

Reason:         To protect the amenity of surrounding properties.

 

51.   Swimming pool (part 2)

 

At all times:

 

1.    Access to the swimming pool must be restricted by fencing or other measures as required by the Swimming Pools Act 1992.

2.    Noise levels associated with spa/pool pumping units shall not exceed 5dB(A) above the background noise level at the boundaries of the site.

3.    Devices or structures used for heating swimming pool water must not be placed where they are visible from a public place.

4.    For the purpose of health and amenity, the disposal of backwash and/or the emptying of a swimming pool into a reserve, watercourse, easement or storm water drainage system is prohibited. These waters are to discharge via a permanent drainage line into Sydney Water's sewer in accordance with Australian Standard AS3500.2 section 10.9. Permission is to be obtained from Sydney Water prior to the emptying of any pool to the sewer.

5.    Lighting from the swimming pool and other communal facilities shall not detrimentally impact the amenity of other premises and adjacent dwellings.

 

Reason:         Health and amenity.

 

52.   Rural Fire Services (RFS)

 

Prior to the commencement of any works, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the following RFS requirements have been satisfied:

 

Asset Protection Zones

 

The intent of measures is to minimise the risk of bush fire attack and provide protection for emergency services personnel, residents and others assisting fire fighting activities. To achieve this, the following conditions shall apply:

 

At the commencement of building works and in perpetuity the entire property shall be managed as an inner protection area (IPA) as outlined within section 4.1.3 and Appendix 5 of 'Planning for Bush Fire Protection 2006' and the NSW Rural Fire Service's document 'Standards for asset protection zones'.

 

To allow for emergency service personnel and residents to undertake property protection activities, a defendable space that permits unobstructed pedestrian access is to be provided around the building.

 

Water and Utilities

 

The intent of measures is to minimise the risk of bush fire attack and provide protection for emergency services personnel, residents and others assisting fire fighting activities. To achieve this, the following conditions shall apply:

 

New installations of water, electricity and gas are to comply with section 4.1.3 of 'Planning for Bush Fire Protection 2006'.

 

Design and Construction

 

The intent of measures is that buildings are designed and constructed to withstand the potential impacts of bush fire attack. To achieve this, the following conditions shall apply:

 

New construction on the north-western elevation(s) shall comply with Sections 3 and 8 (BAL 40) Australian Standard AS3959-2009 'Construction of buildings in bush fire-prone areas' and section A3.7 Addendum Appendix 3 of 'Planning for Bush Fire Protection'.

 

New construction shall comply with Sections 3 and 9 (BAL FZ) Australian Standard AS3959-2009 'Construction of buildings in bush fire-prone areas'. However, any material, element of construction or system when tested to the method described in Australian Standard AS1530.8.2 Methods for fire tests on building materials, components and structures Part 8.2: Tests on elements of construction for buildings exposed to simulated bushfire attack-Large flaming sources shall comply with Clause 13.8 of that Standard except that flaming of the specimen is not permitted and there shall be no exposed timber.

 

Windows assemblies shall comply with modified Sections 3 and 9 of AS3959 (as above) or the following:

 

i.     They shall be completely protected by a non-combustible and non perforated bushfire shutter that complies with Section 3.7 of AS3959 excluding parts (e) & (f); and

 

ii     They shall comply with the following:

 

a)      Window frames and hardware shall be metal;

b)      Glazing shall be toughened glass, minimum 6mm;

c)      Seals to stiles, head and sills or thresholds shall be manufactured from materials having a flammability index no greater than 5;

d)      The openable portion of the window shall be screened internally or externally with a mesh with a maximum aperture of 2mm, made from corrosion resistant steel or bronze. The frame supporting the mesh shall be metal.

 

External Doors (not including garage doors) shall comply with modified Sections 3 and 9 of AS3959 (as above) or the following:

 

i.     They shall be completely protected by a non-combustible and non perforated bushfire shutter that complies with Section 3.7 of AS3959 excluding parts (e) & (f); and

 

ii.    They shall comply with the following:

 

a)      Doors shall be non-combustible;

b)      Externally fitted hardware that supports the panel in its function of opening and closing shall be metal;

c)      Where doors incorporate glazing, the glazing shall be toughened glass minimum 6mm;

d)      Seals to stiles, head and sills or thresholds shall be manufactured from silicone;

e)      Doorframes shall be metal;

f)       Doors shall be tight fitting to the doorframe or an abutting door;

g)      Weather strips, draught excluders or draught seals shall be installed if applicable.

 

The existing dwelling is required to be upgraded to improve ember protection. This is to be achieved by enclosing all openings (excluding roof tile spaces) or covering openings with a non-corrosive metal screen mesh with a maximum aperture of 2mm. Where applicable, this includes any sub floor areas, openable windows, vents, weepholes and eaves. External doors are to be fitted with draft excluders.

 

Landscaping

 

Landscaping to the site is to comply with the principles of Appendix 5 of 'Planning for Bush Fire Protection 2006'. In this regard the following landscaping principles are to be incorporated into the development:

 

    Suitable impervious areas being provided immediately surrounding the building such as courtyards, paths and driveways;

 

    Grassed areas/mowed lawns/ or ground cover plantings being provided in close proximity to the building;

 

    Restrict planting in the immediate vicinity of the building which may over time and if not properly maintained come in contact with the building;

 

    Maximum tree cover should be less than 30%, and maximum shrub cover less than 20%;

 

    Planting should not provide a continuous canopy to the building (i.e. trees or shrubs should be isolated or located in small clusters);

 

    When considering landscape species consideration needs to be given to estimated size of the plant at maturity;

 

    Avoid species with rough fibrous bark, or which retain/shed bark in long strips or retain dead material in their canopies;

 

    Use smooth bark species of trees species which generally do not carry a fire up the bark into the crown;

 

    Avoid planting of deciduous species that may increase fuel at surface/ ground level (i.e. leaf litter);

 

    Avoid climbing species to walls and pergolas;

 

    Locate combustible materials such as woodchips/mulch, flammable fuel stores away from the building;

 

    Locate combustible structures such as garden sheds, pergolas and materials such timber garden furniture way from the building; and

 

    Use of low flammability vegetation species.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

108

Updated Policy on Dividing Fences adjoining Council Land

 

File: CY00068/6

Vide: GB.7

 

 

To seek endorsement of Council on an updated Policy and Procedure on Dividing Fences adjoining Council Land.

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors McDonald/Szatow)

 

That Council adopt the updated Policy and Procedure on Dividing Fences adjoining Council land.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

  

 

Motions of which due Notice has been given

 

 

109

Rejuvenation of Grandview Street, Pymble Shopping Precinct

 

File: S05711

Vide: NM.1

 

 

The following members of the public addressed Council:

 

M Burton

P Cooper

 

 

Notice of Motion from Councillor Ossip dated 31 March 2014

 

The Pymble village shopping precinct on Grandview Street has served Pymble well since it was established over a century ago, before the construction of the North Shore railway line. Most of the present shops were built in the interwar period in the traditional strip-shopping village style in proximity of the station.

 

It has been widely observed that the Grandview Street precinct in Pymble has become somewhat dated over the years and is now regarded by many as the most neglected and aesthetically displeasing town centre in Ku-ring-gai.  In recent months, shop owners and residents of the area have made representations to Council about the state of the precinct. This is nothing new - there is evidence that this has been an issue of consternation for Pymble residents and shop owners for at least the past 18 years, with the first letter on the issue being received by Council in 1996. In 2001, two petitions with a combined 1,050 signatures were submitted to Council requesting action to improve the state of the precinct. Unfortunately, no such action has been taken to date.

 

At present, Council has no plans for any works in Pymble until after 2031 at the earliest. Pymble is not a neighbourhood centre and is consequently not included in the neighbourhood centres program. Further, it is not a town centre in which Council expects significant, if any commercial redevelopment. Accordingly, development contributions sufficient to fund any upgrade works are not anticipated.

 

Without action, therefore, the Pymble town centre will continue to be neglected and will continue to deteriorate. Residents and local shop owners are demanding that the area be revitalised and beautified as a priority.

 

I believe a significant opportunity exists for Council to assist in the rejuvenation of an important, historical area of Ku-ring-gai. Indeed, even minor upgrades of the precinct would be consistent with Council’s economic and social development objectives and enhance civic pride.

 

I therefore move that:

 

“1.  Council begins the process of community consultation with residents and shop owners in Pymble to ascertain what improvements these stakeholders view as desirable for the Pymble village shopping precinct in Grandview Street.

 

2.    A report be brought back to Council within 3 months providing Council with options as to how the precinct can be rejuvenated and revitalised. “

 

 

Motion:

 

(Moved: Councillors Ossip/Citer)

 

That the above Notice of Motion as printed be adopted.

 

For the Motion:                      Councillors Armstrong, Citer and Ossip

 

Against the Motion:                The Mayor, Councillor J Anderson, Councillors McDonald, Pettett, Szatow, Malicki and Fornari-Orsmond

 

No decision was taken in respect of the above matter as

the Motion when put to the vote was LOST

 

 

The above Motion was subject to an Amendment which was LOST.  The Lost Amendment was:

 

(Moved:  Councillors Ossip/Citer

 

A report be brought back to Council within 3 months providing Council with options as to how the precinct can be rejuvenated and revitalised.

 

  

 

QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE

 

 

110

828 Pacific Highway Gordon

 

File: S08130/5

Vide: QN.1

 

 

Question Without Notice from Councillor David Armstrong

 

Could the Director responsible for the refurbishment of 828 Pacific Highway please give a summary of progress made and monies spent to date?

 

Answer by the General Manager

 

Happy to take that on notice and provide a written memorandum to Councillors.

 

 

 

 

111

Completion of Planning Proposal for 20 to 28 Culworth Avenue and
17 Marian Street, Killara

 

File: S09768

Vide: QN.2

 

 

Question Without Notice from Councillor Cheryl Szatow

 

Could a copy of the General Manager’s letter dated 20 February 2014 to the Department of Planning and Infrastructure requesting an extension of time for completion of the planning proposal under the Gateway Determination be placed on Council’s website along with other “Additional Material” relating to the public exhibition and the request for submissions relating to the planning proposal for 20 to 28 Culworth Avenue and 17 Marian Street, Killara?

 

Answer by the General Manager

 

Whilst not directly related to the second exhibition, it is a publicly available document and happy to put it on Council’s website.

 

 

 

112

Disclosure of Confidential Documents regarding Acquisition of 828 Pacific Highway Gordon

 

File: S08130/5

Vide: QN.3

 

 

Question Without Notice from Councillor Cheryl Szatow

 

What is the current timing for the release of the disclosure of confidential documents regarding the acquisition of 828 Pacific Highway Gordon as resolved at the Ordinary Meeting of Council on 18 March 2014?

 

Answer by the General Manager

 

The Corporate Lawyer and I have met on those today.  As late as this afternoon, if they are not already but from tomorrow morning, some will start to be available and we decided that rather than vet all the documents and put them up in one hit, we think it is fairer to actually stage them so as we release them, we will just periodically put them up on the website.

 

 

 

113

Netball Courts at Canoon Road Turramurra

 

File: S02268

Vide: QN.4

 

 

Question Without Notice from Councillor David Armstrong

 

Could you please advise us on the upgrade and scope of upgrade on the netball courts at South Turramurra?

 

Answer by the Director Operations

 

Happy to report back on that but there is information in the current Delivery Program that has gone out on exhibition indicating what works are planned for the next 4 to 5 years.

 

 

 

Inspections Committee – SETTING OF TIME, DATE AND RENDEZVOUS

 

An Inspections Committee will take place to view the following properties:

 

1574 to 1578 Pacific Highway, Wahroonga

 

Councillors and immediate surrounding parties will be advised of the date, time and rendezvous of the Inspections Committee.

 

 

 

The Meeting closed at 8.04pm

 

 

The Minutes of the Ordinary Meeting of Council held on 8 April 2014 (Pages 1 - 41) were confirmed as a full and accurate record of proceedings on 29 April 2014.

 

 

 

 

 

          __________________________                                 __________________________

                   General Manager                                                         Mayor / Chairperson

 

 

 


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 29 April 2014

MM.1 / 48

 

 

Item MM.1

CY00416/2

 

3 April 2014

 

 

Mayoral Minute

 

 

Ku-ring-gai Flying-Fox Reserve

 

  

The Ku-ring-gai Flying-Fox Reserve (KFFR), located in Gordon, has been subject to a Conservation Agreement, entered into between Ku-ring-gai Council and the NSW Government, since February 1991, to ensure the continuing protection and preservation of native flora and fauna, in particular the Grey-headed Flying-fox colony and all elements of its habitat, within the Ku-ring-gai Flying-fox Reserve (KFFR).

 

Historically the Flying-fox colony has moved periodically around the KFFR.  At times when the Flying-fox colony inhabits the deeper areas of the Reserve the impacts to residents have been negligible. However, since 2009 the flying-fox colony has inhabited an area very close to properties adjacent to the KFFR, in Taylor and Waugoola Streets (see Ku-ring-gai Flying-Fox Management Plan 2013 – Appendix 6).

 

This has led to persistent disturbance to residents in Taylor and Waugoola Streets over a number of years, caused by the noise, smell and droppings, especially around the breeding period (March - April) where numbers are in the tens of thousands and intolerable noise levels are experienced by residents for large periods of the day and night. This has resulted in severe impacts to the quality of life for these residents over prolonged periods.

 

Ku-ring-gai Council has an obligation to protect and conserve its threatened ecological communities, species and populations, as well to protect the interests and wellbeing of its residents. The Ku-ring-gai Flying-fox Management Plan, most recently reviewed and endorsed by Council in August 2013, attempts to strike a balance between these two equally important aims, within a prescribed management framework largely determined by State and federal legislation, for example, the Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 and the Environment Protection & Biodiversity Conservation (EPBC) Act 1999. This is further complicated by the conditions of the Conservation Agreement.

 

Management actions in the KFFR Management Plan, aimed at reducing the impacts of the Flying-foxes on residents and their properties (especially those adjacent to the KFFR) are as follows:

 

•        Investigate and secure an alternative location for the Flying-fox release cage (away from residential housing), as part of the KFFR rehabilitation and release program.

 

•        Collaborate with relevant agencies, organisations, councils and Flying-fox experts on best practice Flying-fox management for implementation within the KFFR

 

•        Prepare and submit licence and referral applications to initiate strategic tree removal and vegetation modification works in the KFFR close to residential housing on Taylor Street and Waugoola Street

 

•        Conduct approved strategic tree removal and vegetation modification works in the KFFR close to residential housing on Taylor Street and Waugoola Street

 

•        Formalise community engagement processes to ensure that local community groups and residents are consulted and updated on management activities within the KFFR.

 

•        Elevate community engagement efforts during periods of greatest community concern, for example, when Flying-foxes numbers are at their highest during the breeding season

 

•        Review and determine the feasibility of potential Flying-fox management options on an annual basis, for implementation within the KFFR before the breeding season commences,  including, but not limited to:

o        Providing information and / or securing funding for sound insulation in dwellings adjacent to the KFFR

o        Strategic tree removal and vegetation modification works at the boundary between the KFFR and private property where there is a risk to life or property or where there is significant noise disturbance to residents over prolonged periods (that is, over a number of breeding seasons)

o        Effective, humane and legal methods to nudge the Flying-fox camp away from the Reserve edges (where Flying-foxes are less than 50m from habitable dwellings and causing significant noise disturbance to residents over prolonged periods).

 

•        Implement feasible Flying-fox management options within the KFFR on an annual basis, before the breeding season commences

 

•        Investigate ways to incorporate Flying-fox information or guidelines into 149 certificates

 

•        Engage with proponents of any activities which may impact the KFFR (such as planned dispersals)

 

Unfortunately, the activities conducted to date have had little success in alleviating the impacts on residents adjacent to the Reserve. Despite ongoing investigations, there appears to be no feasible (effective, humane and legal) or affordable methods to successfully nudge the Flying-fox camp away from the Reserve edges. Whilst Council staff are empathetic with residents, all options have been exhausted within the current legal and management framework in which Council operates.

 

In light of the above, I move the following to ensure that the management issues associated with the KFFR, specifically the impact on the residents, are elevated to the Minister for Environment:

 

 

Recommendation:

 

A.       That the Mayor writes to the Minister for Environment outlining the management issues / constraints associated with the KFFR and the ongoing impacts on residents.

 

B.       That the Mayor seeks a meeting with the Minister for Environment to clearly articulate Council’s position and management program and to seek the NSW Government’s support for future management of the Reserve

 

C.       That the Councillors, Council management and the community be updated in relation to the status of this matter.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jennifer Anderson

Mayor

 

 

 

  


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 29 April 2014

MM.2 / 51

 

 

Item MM.2

CY00455/2

 

16 April 2014

 

 

Mayoral Minute

 

 

Award Certificates for former Councillor Ian Cross

  

 

Tonight we honour a former long-serving Councillor, Ian Cross who retired in 2012.

 

Ian Cross was first elected to Council in 1999 in Wahroonga Ward. He has served as Mayor for four terms, from 2002 to 2004 and from 2009 to 2011. He was also Deputy Mayor for the 2001-2002 term.

 

Ian has chaired or served on committees including finance, heritage, sustainability and open space, parks and reserves.

 

We all know of the demands civic office can place on our lives. Successfully performing the role of a local Councillor can require an enormous amount of commitment and dedication with very little financial reward.

 

Ian has been awarded two NSW Local Government and Shires Associations’ awards: the Certificate of Service Award and the Emeritus Mayor Certificate, which honours Mayors who have served a minimum of three one-year terms.

 

On behalf of the Ku-ring-gai community, I thank Ian for his valuable contributions to our community and invite him to receive his two awards certificates.

 

Recommendation:

 

That the Mayoral Minute be received and noted.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jennifer Anderson

Mayor

 

 

 

   


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 29 April 2014

PT.1 / 52

 

 

Item PT.1

DA0060/14

 

22 April 2014

 

 

Petition

 

 

Petition Against the Development of a Child Care Centre at 17 Bandalong Avenue, Pymble –
(Two Hundred and Twenty [220] Signatures

  

 

“We, the undersigned, petition Ku-ring-gai Council to reject the establishment of a child care centre at 17 Bandalong Avenue, West Pymble for the following reasons:

 

       Traffic volume increase from 6.30am (the Centre’s proposed opening times 6.30am to 6.30pm);

 

       Increased parking on the street – only 3 onsite parking spots are available for 36 families;

 

       The Centre is proposed to be built on the blind bend of Bandalong Avenue – this is a safety issue for crossing the road and local pedestrians;

 

       There are already Child Care Centres in West Pymble that have spaces available including a new Centre being built on Yanko Road;

 

       Traffic congestion will cause problems for local service access, for example: buses and the garbage service.

 

We are indicating our strong opposition to this development as we fear it will result in uncharacteristically large built form for the area, increased traffic congestion, road and pedestrian safety and undue noise.  Additionally, the proposed building is non-compliant in respect of numerous developmental controls – so therefore it should be refused by Council as a matter of course.”

 

Recommendation:

 

That the petition be received and referred to the appropriate Officer of Council for attention.

 

 


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 29 April 2014

PT.2 / 53

 

 

Item PT.2

S04668

 

22 April 2014

 

 

Petition

 

 

Objection to Culling of Feral Rabbits –
(One Hundred and Ninety-Four [194] Signatures

  

 

“To the Australian Government, Ku-ring-gai Council, Urban Feral Animal Action Group (UFAAG), NSW, we, the undersigned world-wide, object to Ku-ring-gai Council, as well as other Councils in the Northern Sydney region releasing a deadly virus causing Rabbit Hemorrhagic Disease (RHD) into the national parks of Northern Sydney targeting wild rabbits.  This virus causes “a slow and painful death”, taking two to three days to kill its host, causing them to bleed internally.  This is inhumane, immoral and even more mindless than the introduction of rabbits to Australia in the first place.

 

It’s extremely arrogant to be playing ‘God’ (or rather, the Devil) in effort to exterminate a population of other living creatures, that are by some mis-guided people considered "pests" and that are essentially not very different from us, humans.  According to the scientific discoveries of recent times, there's only 1-2% difference between our and animal genotypes.

 

According to http://www.rabbit.org/care/vhd.html insects, birds and animals such as rodents are known to spread the virus by acting as indirect hosts - spreading the disease from infected to uninfected rabbits.  Humans can also spread the virus to their pet rabbits if they have been in contact with infected rabbits or in contact with surroundings contaminated by the virus.

 

Using viruses as a method of Biological Population control is risky and extremely unethical - a method that should be banned.  Although scientists pride themselves on being able to study, create, propagate and control viruses in the lab, it is a dangerous weapon of consequences we cannot predict. We have no control over what chemicals and environments wild animals are in contact with.  Viruses can mutate or cross over to other species creating something that could be disastrous.  Apart from it being an inhumane and horrendous way to kill an innocent creature we need to take responsibility of the unknown side effects; how it may affect other species, our pets, our children, us and the future of this planet.

 

It's also time that councils become aware that the pesticides they commonly use on so-called weeds are contributing to the disappearance of bees, which threatens our own existence.

 

As to the rabbits, nature will take appropriate care of them and ultimately of us humans, if we continue to spread death and destruction around us.  Rather than "modifying" our natural environment to feed the interests of pharma-chemical cartel, Councils and other government authorities should look to the law of nature by adapting to our habitat, rather than the other way around.  We must recognise the fact that we are part of a living system and to continue our existence we must learn to live in harmony with our habitat and all fellow species.  The use of any artificial life-destroying substances should be banned by those public authorities responsible for protecting our natural habitat.

 

Permaculture is a well known and world wide recognised science, developed by an Australian, Bill Mollison, which if incorporated into our daily practice would make a world of difference in our quality of life.  Why not incorporate Permaculture into the "management" of "our" natural resources, including rabbits?

 

It simply doesn't make sense to continue the destruction of our own nest, even birds know that - Counting on Councils common sense and goodwill, we request that the plans to introduce any biological agents (as well as chemicals used for weed control) into the environment now and in the future be abandoned.

 

Recommendation:

 

That the petition be received and referred to the appropriate Officer of Council for attention.

 

  


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 29 April 2014

GB.1 / 55

 

 

Item GB.1

S05650

 

3 April 2014

 

 

The Novus Foundation 2014 Gala Dinner

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

purpose of report:

To advise Council of a request from The Novus Foundation to purchase tickets for a Gala Dinner to be held at Miramare Gardens Function Centre, Terrey Hills on Saturday 31 May, 2014.

 

 

background:

The Novus Foundation was established in 2006, as a partnership between Phil McCarroll Automotive and the Wahroonga Rotary Club. The Foundation supports projects directed at the welfare of young people in the Hornsby and Ku-ring-gai region. The primary target group is young people under 25 years of age.

 

 

comments:

Proceeds from the Novus Foundation fundraising in 2014 will support KYDS, StreetWork, Rotary Club of Wahroonga Youth Projects, Achieve Australia and Open Heart International. Tickets for the dinner are $160 per person. Sponsorship packages (including tables of 10) are available for $22,000, $11,000, $5,500 and $3,300.

 

 

recommendation:

That Council determine whether to purchase tickets for The Novus Foundation 2014 Gala Dinner, and that Councillors who are interested in attending the dinner advise the General Manager by Friday 16 May 2014.

 

 

 


  

Purpose of Report

 

To advise Council of a request from The Novus Foundation to purchase tickets for a Gala Dinner to be held at Miramare Gardens Function Centre, Terrey Hills on Saturday 31 May, 2014.

 

Background

 

The Novus Foundation was established in 2006, as a partnership between Phil McCarroll Automotive and the Wahroonga Rotary Club. The Foundation supports projects directed at the welfare of young people in Hornsby and Ku-ring-gai region. The primary target group is young people under 25 years of age. The aim is to develop and support projects and organisations that are investing in youth, primarily in the following areas:

 

·    Direction – giving young people improved mentoring and guidance

·    Educational – giving young people wider access to skills

·    Health – giving young people access to health programs, including youth related medical research

 

Comments

 

The Foundation will be holding a Gala Dinner on 31 May 2014 at Miramare Gardens Function Centre, Terrey Hills. The purpose of the Gala Dinner is to raise funds for nominated projects. In 2014 the Novus Foundation is supporting the following organisations:

 

·    KYDS

·    StreetWork

·    Rotary Club of Wahroonga Youth Projects

·    Achieve Australia

·    Sydney Adventist Hospital Open Heart International

 

Tickets for the Gala Dinner are $160.00 per person. Sponsorship packages (including tables of 10) are available for $22,000, $11,000, $5,500 and $3,300.

 

A copy of the brochure and invitation from The Novus Foundation is attached to this report.  

 

 

integrated planning and reporting

 

 

Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective

Delivery Program

Term Achievement

Operational Plan

Task

C1.1 An equitable and inclusive community that cares and provides for its members.

 

Access has increased for communities that face barriers to using social services and facilities.

 

Implement priority recommendations and programs from Council’s Youth Strategy.

 

 

 

Governance Matters

 

In accordance with Council’s ‘Policy for the Payment of Expenses and Provision of Facilities to Councillors’ Section 2.5 - Local Travel Arrangements, Attendance at Dinners and Other Non-Council Functions:

 

Council shall meet the cost of Councillors’ attendance at functions that are of a formal or ceremonial nature within the Sydney metropolitan area, including functions for charities, community service and sporting groups supported by Council or of which Council is a financial member. Council shall meet the cost of any component of the ticket to the function that is a donation to a registered charity but shall not meet the cost of any component of the ticket that is a donation to a political party, candidate’s electoral fund or other private benefit. Each Councillor is entitled to a maximum of $455.00 per year of term for external payments in respect of the types of expenses described in this paragraph.

 

 

Risk Management

 

There are no significant risk management matters directly associated with this report.

 

 

Financial Considerations

 

Individual tickets for the dinner are $160 per person. There are funds available in the 2013/14 budget for the purchase of tickets for the Gala Dinner.

 

Council has also been invited to sponsor a table of 10 at the dinner for $22,000, $11,000, $5,500 or $3,300, however there are no funds available in the 2013/14 sponsorship budget.

 

 

Social Considerations

 

Attendance at the Gala Dinner will enable Councillors to meet other members of the community who support The Novus Foundation, there will also be opportunities to obtain further details about individual projects from representatives of various community organisations.

 

Environmental Considerations

 

There are no significant environmental considerations associated with this report.

 

Community Consultation

 

There has been no community consultation associated with this report.

 

Internal Consultation

 

There has been no internal consultation associated with this report.

 

 

Summary

 

Council has received an invitation to attend The Novus Foundation Gala Dinner to be held on Saturday 31 May 2014 at Miramare Gardens Function Centre, 289 Mona Vale Road, Terrey Hills. Individual tickets are $160 each. Sponsorship packages (including tables of 10) are available for $22,000, $11,000, $5,500 and $3,300.

 

Recommendation:

 

A.       That Council determine whether to purchase tickets for The Novus Foundation Gala Dinner on 31 May 2014.

 

B.       That any Councillors who would like to attend The Novus Foundation 2014 Gala Dinner advise the General Manager by Friday, 16 May 2013.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Danny Houseas

Manager Community

 

 

 

 

Janice Bevan

Director Community

 

 

Attachments:

A1View

Invitation and Brochure for The Novus Foundation 2014 Gala Dinner

 

2014/095015

  


APPENDIX No: 1 - Invitation and Brochure for The Novus Foundation 2014 Gala Dinner

 

Item No: GB.1

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 29 April 2014

GB.2 / 68

 

 

Item GB.2

S08820

 

31 March 2014

 

 

Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters - Inquiry into the
2012 Local Government Elections

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

purpose of report:

To consider the final report received from the Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters in regard to its inquiry into the conduct of the 2012 Local Government Elections.

 

 

background:

Council was invited to make a submission to the Committee in regard to the conduct of the Local Government Elections in March 2013. The terms of reference given to the Committee allowed it to examinee matters relating to the cost of the elections, the experience of councils that conducted their own elections, and any issues arising from non-residential voting. The Committee was also to consider possible legislative changes to improve the efficiency of the election processes and remove any barriers to candidate participation.

 

 

comments:

The Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters has now released its report (see Attachment A1).

 

 

recommendation:

That Council receive and note the report from the Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters in relation to an Inquiry into the 2012 Local Government Elections.

 

 

 


  

Purpose of Report

 

To consider the final report received from the Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters in regard to its inquiry into the conduct of the 2012 Local Government Elections.

 

Background

 

The 2012 Local Government Elections were held on Saturday, 8 September 2012. The Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters was requested to conduct an inquiry in to the elections. The Committee is a current joint standing committee of the Parliament of NSW, first established in May 2004. The Committee primarily oversights the activities of the NSW Electoral Commission, undertakes periodic audits of electoral legislation, and reviews the conduct of State and Local Government elections following each round of elections.

 

The terms of reference of the Committee enable it to examine, inquire into and report on matters related to the functions and operations of the Commission. These matters may be referred to the Committee by either House of Parliament, or by a Minister. On the 12 November 2012, following a referral from the Minister for Local Government, the Hon. Don Page MP, the Committee adopted terms of reference to inquiry into and report on the 2012 Local Government Elections.

 

In December 2012 the Committee invited Councils to make submissions to the Committee in regard to the conduct of the Local Government Elections in March 2013. Council lodged a submission to the Inquiry on the 4 March 2013 (see Attachment A2).

 

The Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters has now released its report (see Attachment A1). The report contains a list of fifteen (15) key recommendations. They are;

 

Recommendation 1

The Committee supports the current arrangements that grant local councils the authority to conduct their own elections. However, the Committee recommends that both the Department of Premier and Cabinet and the Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters review the administration of future elections.

 

Recommendation 2

The Committee recommends that each council that administers its own election be required to submit information relating to candidate participation and voter turnout to the Division of Local Government.

 

Recommendation 3

The Committee recommends that each council that resolves to administer its election in-house be required to prepare a report for the Division of Local Government in which it demonstrates its capacity to conduct a successful election. This report should include council’s access to suitably qualified returning officers, as well as possible substitutes, and be prepared no later than 15 months prior to the 2016 elections.

 

Recommendation 4

The Committee recommends that the Department of Premier and Cabinet takes steps to ensure that all councils not utilising the services of the Electoral Commission, or that are conducting their elections in-house, have secured contracts with an electoral service provider at least 15 months prior to the 2016 elections.

 

Recommendation 5

The Committee recommends that the Division of Local Government provide guidance to the Electoral Commission with respect to the extent and mode of electoral role data that can be disclosed to councils that conduct their own elections. Particular weight should be given to ensuring councils are granted sufficient access to roll data, while safeguarding elector privacy. If this is not possible, the committee believes it is the democratic obligation of the Electoral Commission to provide soft copy access to rolls so that Councils can exercise their right to undertake their own elections, should they decide to do so.

 

Recommendation 6

The Committee recommends that the Government raise the threshold for a candidate to open a campaign account to $2,500, indexed annually to inflation.

 

Recommendation 7

The Committee recommends that the Government remove the mandatory requirement for a candidate to appoint an official agent but that candidates may choose to appoint an official agent if they wish.

 

Recommendation 8

The Committee recommends that the Government remove the requirement that a candidate information sheet is made in the form of a statutory declaration.

 

Recommendation 9

The Committee recommends the introduction of a countback system, modelled on the one currently operating in Victoria, as an option for councils when casual vacancies arise within 18 months of the original election in lieu of a by-election.

 

Recommendation 10

The Committee recommends that the Government abolish the existing eligibility requirements with respect to whether an elector is qualified to cast a postal vote.

 

Recommendation 11

The Committee recommends that each council be granted the option to conduct its elections via a postal ballot in lieu of attendance voting on a designated polling day.

 

Recommendation 12

The Committee recommends that the Government abolish existing eligibility requirements with respect to whether an elector is qualified to cast a pre-poll vote. Further, the Committee recommends that the Government retains the existing two week pre-poll period.

 

Recommendation 13

The Committee recommends that the Government extend technology-assisted voting (or iVote) to be available to all electors ahead of the 2016 Local Government elections and subsequent State Elections. The Committee recommends that there is an independent software review and report on the integrity of iVote systems prior to implementation.

 

Recommendation 14

That the Government amend the Local Government Act to provide for permanency of the non-residential roll across all NSW Councils so that electors are not required to re-apply for inclusion prior to each election.

 

Recommendation 15

The Committee recommends that the Government introduce the model used by the City of Melbourne for the City of Sydney in all its respects including the deeming provisions and the compulsory voting aspect for electors on the non-residential roll. Furthermore, the Government consider applying this model to City Council areas with significant economic centres such as Newcastle, Wollongong and Parramatta.

 

Comments

 

The NSW Government is due to respond to the Committee’s report by Saturday, 27 September 2014.

 

integrated planning and reporting

 

Leadership

 

Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective

Delivery Program

Term Achievement

Operational Plan

Task

A shared long term vision for Ku-ring-gai underpins strategic collaboration, policy development and community engagement.

Council's responses to government policy and reforms are guided by and aligned with the adopted Community Strategic Plan 'Our Community Our Future 2030'. 

The organisation responds flexibly, proactively and equitably to challenges and opportunities arising from government policy changes and reforms.

 

Governance Matters

 

Local Government Elections are administered by the General Manager of Council, or by the NSW Electoral Commissioner, in accordance with the provisions of Section 296 of the Local Government Act 1993.

 

Risk Management

 

There are no major risk management considerations associated with the recommendation in this report.

 

Financial Considerations

 

There are no financial management considerations associated with the recommendation in this report.

 

Social Considerations

 

There are no social considerations associated with the recommendation in this report.

 

Environmental Considerations

 

There are no environmental considerations associated with the recommendation in this report.

 

Community Consultation

 

None undertaken or required.

 

Internal Consultation

 

None undertaken or required.

 

Summary

 

The 2012 Local Government Elections were held on Saturday, 8 September 2012. The Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters was requested to conduct an inquiry in to the elections. The Committee is a current joint standing committee of the Parliament of NSW, first established in May 2004. The Committee primarily oversights the activities of the NSW Electoral Commission, undertakes periodic audits of electoral legislation, and reviews the conduct of State and Local Government elections following each round of elections.

 

The Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters has now released its report containing fifteen (15) key recommendations.

 

Recommendation:

 

That Council receive and note the report from the Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters in relation to an Inquiry into the 2012 Local Government Elections.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Matt Ryan

Manager Records & Governance

 

 

 

 

David Marshall

Director Corporate

 

 

Attachments:

A1View

Inquiry into the 2012 Local Government Elections - report from the Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters

 

2014/077466

 

A2View

Submission to the Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters regarding the Inquiry into the 2012 Local Government Elections

 

2013/051225

  


APPENDIX No: 1 - Inquiry into the 2012 Local Government Elections - report from the Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters

 

Item No: GB.2

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


APPENDIX No: 2 - Submission to the Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters regarding the Inquiry into the 2012 Local Government Elections

 

Item No: GB.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contact:  Manager Records and Governance                             Reference: S08820  2013/051225

                                                                                                                                        4 March 2013

 

Jai Rowell MP

Parliament of NSW

Committee on Electoral Matters

Macquarie Street

SYDNEY  NSW  2000

electoralmatters.committee@parliament.nsw.gov.au

 

 

Dear Jai,

 

Commission on Electoral Matters Inquiry into the 2012 Local Government Elections - Submission

 

Council has received your letter dated 20 December 2012 in which you advise of the formation of an Inquiry into the 2012 Local Government Elections. I also make reference to subsequent emails between Mr Jason Arditi, Inquiry Manager of your office and Mr Matt Ryan, Council’s Manager Records and Governance, dated 18 January 2013 in which Council sought, and was granted, an extension of time to make a submission to the Inquiry.

 

At the Ordinary Meeting of Council held Tuesday, 5 February 2013 Council resolved to make a submission to the Committee. Comments from Councillors were requested and these formed the basis of a subsequent report that was considered at the Ordinary Meeting of Council held on Tuesday, 26 February 2013. At this meeting Council resolved;

 

“That Council’s submission to the Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters in regards to the conduct of the 2012 Local Government elections include the comments contained within the report, and

 

“That the comments of individual Councillors be attributed to them in the contents of the submission”.

 

Thereby please find Council’s submission below.

 

Five (5) comments in relation to the elections were received from Councillors as follows;

 

Councillor Jennifer Anderson;

 

In relation to cost of the elections - decision out of our Council's hands as to where to install the Returning Officer. Cost of renting another building, inconvenient and confusing for pre-poll voters and candidates. Costs relating to a controversy over electricity bills. Enormous increase over recent elections in costs to each council.

 

Electronic roll comes too late to be of use to candidates.

 

Costs of printing brochures is enormous and must be beyond many potential candidates. Perhaps time for electronic information and electronic voting.

 

I attended two information sessions before the elections, one at Hornsby and one at Ku-ring-gai. Both had different presenters and differing information was given. One session said anyone who was a developer or associate of a developer who made their income from development, could not self fund their campaign. The other said they could self fund.

 

It’s a significant impost on candidates and campaign workers to service the full 2 week pre-poll period. It’s a massive task to have volunteers man the pre-poll for all day for the two weeks. The first week is usually pretty quiet. Suggest to shorten this period for pre-poll.

 

Councillor Christiane Berlioz;

 

The 2 week Pre-polling time - is too long and onerous on "manpower" for candidates and also for the electoral commission - not sure about impact on council. 5 days is more than enough for pre-poll.

 

There are too many polling places per ward (8 in St Ives) - this is extremely onerous for candidates to "man".

 

For integrity and fairness: candidates should run as individuals - not as a team with advantages over candidates standing individually "under the line". There should not be any preference sharing between candidates. This is exploited as candidates put up a selection of "dummy" candidates with which to exchange preferences.

 

Declaration of interest - candidates should have to sign a "statutory declaration" of interests - pecuniary or otherwise and other declarations on the Candidate Registration Form (eg properties ownership within the municipality, party membership). There should be heavier sanctions for breaches of declarations.

 

Councillor Christiane Berlioz;

 

Additional point: any person that declares themselves as member of a political party should have the information on all electoral material. For example Liberal Party member or Liberal Party endorsed, as the case may be.

 

Under the current system candidates who are members of parties but not endorsed - play both cards to suit their campaign - declaring themselves as an independent, or party member, as it suits them.

 

If it were mandatory to declare party membership or endorsement it would solve the problem for independents who are falsely accused by rival candidates as being members of political parties unpopular in the ward/municipality.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Councillor Christiane Berlioz;

 

Additional point: for non resident candidates - any business lease should be signed a minimum of 3 months before elections and there should be a statutory declaration that the lessee, or business property owner, occupies the business premises (ie not leasing an empty office space just to be eligible as candidate).

 

Councillor Cheryl Szatow;

 

I have two concerns to raise as a result of experiences in two local elections;

 

Anonymous flyers discrediting other candidates and/or sitting councillors and casting slurs on their bona fides - distributed to residents. What can be done?

 

Information stating in what Council Area candidates reside should be mandatory information to be included on all election material about a given candidate.

 

I would like to take this opportunity to formally thank you for inviting Council to be a part of this Inquiry and I look forward to reviewing the Committee’s findings.

 

Yours faithfully

 

 

John McKee

GENERAL MANAGER

 

 

 


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 29 April 2014

GB.3 / 183

 

 

Item GB.3

S05273

 

3 April 2014

 

 

Investment Report as at 31 March 2014

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

purpose of report:

To present Council’s investment portfolio performance for March 2014.

 

 

background:

Council’s investments are reported monthly to Council in accordance with the Local Government Act 1993, the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 and Council’s Investment Policy.

 

 

comments:

The net return on investments for the financial year to March 2014 was $2,936,000 against a revised budget of $2,881,000, giving a YTD favourable variance of $55,000.

 

 

recommendation:

That the summary of investments performance for March 2014 be received and noted; and that the Certificate of the Responsible Accounting Officer be noted and report adopted. 

 

 

 


  

Purpose of Report

 

To present Council’s investment portfolio performance for March 2014.

 

Background

 

Council’s investments are reported monthly to Council in accordance with the Local Government Act 1993, the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 and Council’s Investment Policy.

 

Comments

 

Investment Portfolio Performance Snapshot

 

The table below provides the investments portfolio performance against targets identified in Council’s Investment Policy as well as other key performance indicators based on industry benchmarks.

 

 

 

Cumulative Investment Return against Revised Budget

 

The net return on investments for the financial year to March 2014 was $2,936,000 against a revised budget of $2,881,000, giving a YTD favourable variance of $55,000. The total return on investments (interest and net capital gain) for the month of March is provided below. It is expected to achieve the forecasted yearly budget of $3,779,100 by financial year end.

 

 

A comparison of the cumulative investment returns against year to date budget is shown in Chart below.

 

 

 

Cash Flow  and Investment Movements

 

Council’s total cash and investment portfolio at the end of March 2014 is $83,852,000.

 

The net cash outflow for the month was $4,695,000 mainly due to creditor payments for capital works projects.

 

There were four investments matured in March 2014 and three new investments were made during the month. Table 1 below provides detailed movements of the investment by institution name, investment rating and interest rate.

 

 

Table 1 – Investment Movements - March 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investment Performance against Industry Benchmarks

 

Overall during the month of March the investments performance was well above industry benchmark. The benchmark is specific to the type of investment and details are provided below.

 

Ø UBS Bank Bill Index is used for all Council’s investments

 

A comparison of the portfolio returns against investment benchmark is provided in Table 2 below.

 

Table 2 - Investments Performance against Industry Benchmarks

 

 

Table 3 below provides a summary of all investments by type and performance during the month.

Attachment A1 provides definitions in relation to different types of investment.

 

Table 3 - Investments Portfolio Summary

 

 

 

 *   Weighted average returns

 ** Refer to Risk Management section for commentary on these investments

 

 

Investment by Credit rating and Maturity Profile

 

The allocation of Council’s investments by credit rating and the maturity profile are shown below:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

integrated planning and reporting

 

Leadership & Governance

 

Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective

Delivery Program

Term Achievement

Operational Plan

Task

L2.1 Council rigorously manages its financial

resources and assets to maximise delivery of

services

Council maintains and improves its long term financial position and performance.

Continue to analyse opportunities to expand the revenue base of Council

 

 

Governance Matters

 

Council’s investments are made in accordance with the Local Government Act (1993), the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 and Council’s Investment Policy.

 

A revised Investment Policy was adopted by Council on 10 December 2013.

 

Section 212 of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 states:

 

(1)     The responsible accounting officer of a council:

 

(a)     must provide the council with a written report (setting out details of all money that the council has invested under section 625 of the Act) to be presented:

 

(i)      if only one ordinary meeting of the council is held in a month, at that meeting, or

 

(ii)     if more than one such meeting is held in a month, at whichever of those meetings the council by resolution determines, and

 

(b)     must include in the report a certificate as to whether or not the investment has been made in accordance with the Act, the regulations and the council’s investment policies.

 

(2)     The report must be made up to the last day of the month immediately preceding the meeting.

 

Risk Management

 

Council manages the risk associated with investments by diversifying the types of investment, credit quality, counterparty exposure and term to maturity profile.

 

Council invests its funds in accordance with The Ministerial Investment Order.

 

All investments are made with consideration of advice from Council’s appointed investment advisor, CPG Research & Advisory.

 

Council has two “Grandfathered” investments in structured products that were previously entered into in accordance with The Ministerial Investment Order at the time. The Ministerial Investment Order no longer allows investment in these products. These investments are: 

 

Maple Hill – HSBC Bank

 

Maple Hill, with a face value of $3,000,000, is invested by Council on a “held to maturity” basis being December 2014. This CDO has incurred six previous credit events by the underlying securities and can withstand a further five credit events before principal loss is incurred. There are no distressed securities now and independent advice is that the CDO is at low risk of not recovering the full principal. The investment has not operated outside of its terms and conditions, it continues to fully meet interest payments as and when they fall due and there has not been a reduction in the coupon rate. While Council intends to hold this investment to maturity, the market value at 31 March 2014 was quoted by HSBC at $2,949,000.

 

CPDO PP – Royal Bank of Scotland

 

This Constant Proportion Debt Obligations Principal Protected (CPDO PP), with a face value of $6,000,000, is invested by Council on a “held to maturity” basis being September 2016. This CPDO is capital protected at maturity date by Royal Bank of Scotland. Since December 2011 it ceased to pay interest, due to a decrease in the credit indices it was linked to, creating an unwind event. The investment now takes the form of a zero coupon senior bank bond with a value of $6M. While Council intends to hold this investment to maturity, the market value at 31 March 2014 was quoted by RBS Morgan at $5,439,000.

 

Financial Considerations

 

The revised budget for interest on investments for the financial year 2013/2014 is $3,779,100. Of this amount approximately $2,671,200 is restricted for the benefit of future expenditure relating to developers’ contributions, $361,200 transferred to the internally restricted Infrastructure & Facility Reserve, and the remainder of $746,700 is available for operations.

 

Social Considerations

 

Not applicable.

 

Environmental Considerations

 

Not applicable.

 

Community Consultation

 

None undertaken or required.

 

Internal Consultation

 

None undertaken or required.

 

Certification - Responsible Accounting Officer

 

I hereby certify that the investments listed in the attached report have been made in accordance with Section 625 of the Local Government Act 1993, clause 212 of the Local Government General Regulation 2005 and Council’s Investment Policy.

 

Summary

 

As at 31 March 2014:

 

 

Ø Council’s total cash and investment portfolio is $83,852,000.

 

Ø Council’s net return on investments for the financial year to March 2014 was $2,936,000 against a budget of $2,881,000, giving a YTD favourable variance of $55,000.

 

Recommendation:

 

A.       That the summary of investments and performance for March 2014 be received and noted.

 

B.       That the Certificate of the Responsible Accounting Officer be noted and the report adopted.

 

 

 

Tony Ly

Financial Accounting Officer

 

Angela Apostol

Manager Finance

 

David Marshall

Director Corporate

 

 

Attachments:

A1View

Investments definitions specific to Council’s investment portfolio

 

2014/037712

  


APPENDIX No: 1 - Investments definitions specific to Council’s investment portfolio

 

Item No: GB.3

 


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 29 April 2014

GB.4 / 192

 

 

Item GB.4

DA0015/14

 

18 March 2014

 

 

development application

 

 

Summary Sheet

 

Report title:

60 Bannockburn Road, Pymble - Alterations and additions to the existing dwelling

ITEM/AGENDA NO:

GB.4

 

 

Application No:

DA0015/14

Property Details:

60 Bannockburn Road, Pymble

Lot & DP No: Lot 13 DP 13111

Site area (m2): 1612m²

Zoning: Residential 2(c)

Ward:

Wahroonga

Proposal/Purpose:

To determine Development Application DA0015/14 for alterations and additions to the existing dwelling

Type of Consent:

Local

Applicant:

Urbanesque Planning Pty Ltd

Owner:

Stephen and Alison Flannigan

Date Lodged:

21 January 2014

Recommendation:

Approval

 

 

  

 


Purpose of Report

 

To determine Development Application No 0015/14, which seeks consent for alterations and additions to the existing dwelling on the subject site.  As there would be a variation to a development standard that exceeds 10%, the DA must be determined by full Council.

 

Consideration of variation pursuant to SEPP No. 1

 

Under the provisions of Clause 60C(2) of the Ku-ring-gai Planning Scheme Ordinance the Built-upon Area (BUA) for the site is prescribed at 60% of the total site area.

 

The existing development, which consists of a two storey dwelling, in-ground swimming pool and tennis court, exceeds Council’s BUA, equating to 71.78% of the site area.

 

The works proposed under DA0015/14 result in a net reduction to the existing BUA of 3.29m² making the total BUA for the site 71.58%.  However, this BUA still remains over the prescribed maximum of 60% and therefore requires a SEPP 1 Objection.

 

integrated planning and reporting

 

Places, Spaces & Infrastructure

 

Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective

Delivery Program

Term Achievement

Operational Plan

Task

P3.1 The built environment delivers attractive, interactive and sustainable living and working environments.

A high standard of design quality and building environmental performance is achieved in new development.

Assessment of applications is consistent with Council’s adopted LEPs and DCPs.

 

 

Executive Summary

 

Issues:

Built Upon Area  - Clause 60C(2) of the Ku-ring-gai Planning Scheme Ordinance

Submissions:

No submissions received

Land and Environment Court:

N/A

Recommendation:

Approval

 

DA history

 

21 January 2014                                            Application lodged.

 

23 January 2014                                            Internal landscape referral sent.

 

23 January 2014                                            Application notified.

 

THE SITE AND SURROUNDING AREA

 

The site:

 

Visual character study category:

1920-1945

Easements/rights of way:

None identified

Heritage Item:

No

Heritage conservation area:

No

In the vicinity of a heritage item:

No

Bush fire prone land:

No

Endangered species:

Yes – Blue Gum High Forest – No impact

Urban bushland:

No

 

Site description

 

The site is legally described as Lot 13 in DP13111 and is known as 60 Bannockburn Road, Pymble.  The site is on the western side of Bannockburn Road and has a total area of 1612m².  Currently on-site is a two storey residential dwelling, an in-ground swimming pool and a tennis court.  The tennis court is located on the hatched shaped section of the site at the rear.

 

  

Figure 1: Site Aerial Photo                                Figure 2: Locality Aerial Photo

 

Surrounding development

 

The surrounding development is primarily two storey residential dwellings with Bannockburn Oval located opposite the site.

 

THE PROPOSAL

 

The application proposes alterations and additions to the existing dwelling comprising the following:

 

·    demolition of the existing porch and roof and construction of a new verandah and porch

·    internal demolition and widening of front entry to accommodate new doors

·    removal of existing windows to the formal dining room and lounge room and installation of new French doors to a new verandah

·    widening of existing path to front steps

·    rear extension of the existing living room to create new rumpus room

·    demolition of an existing garden bed and extension of the existing rear verandah off the living room to create a new terrace to the new rumpus room, with the existing verandah slab to be raised to match the existing living room level

·    modification of the existing billiard room with the provision of new windows and bi-fold doors

·    lowering and upgrading to paving and retaining walls around the modified billiard room

·    removal of paving at the rear of the new rumpus room and introduction of a grassed area

·    modification and extension of existing retaining wall located adjacent to new rumpus room

·    replacement of the existing roof tiles with new flat terracotta roof tiles 

 

The majority of the work is proposed over existing hard surface areas and will result in a minor reduction of the built-upon area from 71.78% to 71.58% (3.29m²).

 

COMMUNITY CONSULTATION

 

In accordance with Development Control Plan No. 56, owners of surrounding properties were given notice of the application. In response, no submissions were received.

 

INTERNAL REFERRALS

 

Landscaping

 

Council's Landscape and Tree Assessment Officer commented on the proposal as follows:

 

“Site characteristics

The almost level site rises approximately 1.5m to the rear eastern boundary.

 

Tree impacts

There are no significant trees removed or adversely impacted by the proposal.

 

Stormwater plan

A stormwater management plan has not been required.

 

BASIX

There is no landscape commitment under the BASIX certificate.

 

Conclusion

The proposal is supported.”

 

Engineering

 

Council's Development Engineer has no objection to the application, subject to Conditions 11, 12, 25, 27, 28 and 35.

 

 

 

STATUTORY PROVISIONS

 

The proposal is “Local Development” under Part 4 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and requires development consent.

 

State Environmental Planning Policies

 

State Environmental Planning Policy No. 1 – Development Standards

 

This policy provides flexibility in the application of development standards within Planning Instruments in circumstances where strict compliance would be unreasonable or unnecessary or tend to hinder the attainment of the objects specified under Section 5(a)(1) of the Act.

 

Clause 60C(2) of the Ku-ring-gai Planning Scheme Ordinance states that the maximum built-upon area (BUA) for any land on which a dwelling house is or is proposed to be erected or extended or on which development ancillary to the dwelling has been or is proposed to be carried out is  prescribed at 60% of the total site area.

 

The existing development onsite, which comprises of a two storey dwelling, in-ground swimming pool and tennis court, exceeds Council’s built-upon area equating to 71.78%  and the proposal will decrease this to 71.58%.  Accordingly, a SEPP 1 objection has been lodged and the departure from the development standard is considered below.

 

Sydney Regional Environmental Plan No. 20 – Hawkesbury-Nepean River

 

SREP 20 applies to land within the catchment of the Hawkesbury Nepean River.  The general aim of the plan is to ensure that development and future land uses within the catchment are considered in a regional context.  The Plan includes strategies for the assessment of development in relation to water quality and quantity, scenic quality, aquaculture, recreation and tourism.

 

The development has the potential to impact on water quality and volumes to the catchment.

 

Council’s Development Engineer considers the proposed stormwater system to be acceptable. Subject to conditions, the development is unlikely to generate significant additional stormwater and is consistent with the provisions of SREP 20.

 

State Environmental Planning Policy No. 55 - Remediation of Land

 

The provisions of SEPP 55 require Council to consider the potential for a site to be contaminated. The subject site has a history of residential use and as such, it is unlikely to contain any contamination and further investigation is not warranted in this case.

 

State Environmental Planning Policy (Building Sustainability Index: BASIX) 2004

 

A valid BASIX certificate has been submitted. The certificate demonstrates compliance with the provisions of the SEPP and adequately reflects all amendments to the application.

 

 

Ku-ring-gai Planning Scheme Ordinance

 

Part A: Development standards

 

Development standard

Proposed

Complies

Site area:  1612m2

Minimum size allotments

 

 

Site area:  929m2 (min)

1612m2

YES

Site width:  18m (min)

26.9m

YES

Height:  8m or 2storey (max)

8m or 2 storeys

YES

Built upon areas 60%(967.2m2)(max)

 

71.58% (1153.88m2)

(Existing: 71.78%)

 

NO – refer SEPP 1 Objection

 

State Environmental Planning Policy No. 1 (Development Standard)

 

Clause 6 of SEPP 1 incorporates the mechanism for making of a SEPP 1 Objection and provides as follows:

 

Where development could, but for any development standard, be carried out under the Act, the person intending to carry out that development may make a development application in respect of that development, supported by written objection that the development standard is unreasonable or unnecessary in the circumstances of the case, and specify the grounds of that objection.

 

The applicant has submitted a SEPP1 objection (Attachment 1) seeking to vary the development standard under Clause 60C(2) for built upon area.  Currently the built upon area onsite is at 71.78% and the proposal will reduce this to 71.58%.  The SEPP 1 Objection provides that compliance with the development standard is unreasonable or unnecessary as:

 

·    The proposal seeks to increase the existing percentage of landscape areas. The proposal does not impact upon the biodiversity of the locality.

·    The front setback maintains a developed and well landscaped garden and lawn area. The front yard is the primary soft landscaped area and ensures the existing dwelling presents well from the streetscape and adjoining developments. 

·    The proposed landscape area will not increase urban run–off from the current situation as level of pervious areas will Increase. 

·    According to the accompanying Stormwater statement by StormCivil Engineering Solutions, the site has a frontage to Bannockburn Road and by elevation is higher than the level of Bannockburn Road. Consequently the site efficiently drains by gravity to council’s street drainage system.

·    The proposed development decreases the existing percentage of built upon areas.

 

Accordingly, the following assessment has been carried out as follows:

whether the control is a development standard?

 

Clause 60C(2) of the Ku-ring-gai Planning Scheme Ordinance (KPSO) prescribes a maximum built upon area of 60%. As the KPSO is a statutory planning instrument, this control is a development standard as defined under Section 4 of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979.

 

the underlying objectives or purpose behind the standard

 

Clause 60C(2) does not have any specific objectives, however DCP 38 provides guidance with regards to objectives for built upon area, which are as follows:

 

·    Development should maintain a reasonable proportion of the site as soft landscaping to ensure that predominant landscape character of the locality is maintained or enhanced.

·    The built upon area should be reduced where stormwater cannot be directed to the street or a drainage easement.

 

The limitations on built upon area are primarily to reduce impacts upon the landscaped character of the site and locality.  By providing maximum built upon area requirements, soft landscaping and canopy trees can be adequately accommodated on a site whilst also providing appropriate stormwater management for the site. 

 

 

whether compliance with the development standard is consistent with the aims of the policy and, in particular, whether compliance with the development standard hinders the attainment of the objectives specified under Section 5(A)(i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979

 

The aim of SEPP 1 is to:

 

Provide flexibility in the application of planning controls operating by virtue of development standards in circumstances where strict compliance with those standards would, in any particular case, be unreasonable or unnecessary or tend to hinder the attainment of the objects specified in Section 5(a) (i) and (ii) of the Act.

 

In this regard, the objectives of Section 5(a)(i) and (ii) of the Act are:

 

(a) To encourage:

 

(i) The proper management, development and conservation of natural and artificial resources, including agricultural land, natural areas, forests, minerals, water, cities, towns and villages for the purpose of promoting the social and economic welfare of the community and a better environment;

 

(ii) The promotion and co-ordination of the orderly and economic use and development of land;

 

The SEPP 1 Objection states that providing flexibility in the application of the built upon area standard will result in a development that is consistent with the objectives of Sections 5(a)(i) and (ii).  Compliance with the standard in this case would not change the planning outcome of the site, particularly as the majority of the works are over existing hard surface areas. 

whether compliance with the development standard is unreasonable or unnecessary in the circumstances of the case

 

Compliance with the development standard, in this instance, is considered to be unreasonable and unnecessary as the site currently has a built upon area of 71.78% and the proposed development will be constructed over existing hard surface areas with a small amount of existing paving to be removed and converted into soft landscaping.

 

For the proposal to be fully compliant with the 60% standard, the proposal would need to reduce the built upon area by 186.68m².  This would require a large portion of existing paving and part of the tennis court to be removed and replaced with soft landscaping.  This is not considered to be reasonable as the site already has a non-compliant built-upon area and the application proposes to reduce this, albeit marginally.

 

The works proposed at the rear are over existing hard surfaces and will not change the overall landscape character of the site, particularly as the site supports a landscaped frontage which is in keeping with the streetscape character. 

 

whether the objection is well founded

 

The proposed non-compliance to the built-upon area is the product of existing development on the site and will be slightly reduced due to the proposed works.  For this reason and those listed above, the objection is considered to be well founded and it is agreed that compliance with the standard is unreasonable and unnecessary in the circumstances of the case. 

 

whether non-compliance with the development standard is raises any matter of significance for State or regional environmental planning

 

It is considered that there are no matters of significance for State or regional environmental planning in this circumstance.

 

whether there is public benefit in maintaining the planning controls adopted by the environmental planning instrument

 

The development standard for built-upon area is consistent with the development outcomes promoted by the Ku-ring-gai Planning Scheme Ordinance.  There is public benefit in maintaining this development standard but, in this instance, requiring compliance would not be considered reasonable.

 

 

Clause 33(a) – Aesthetic appearance

 

Clause 33(a) of the KPSO requires Council to give appropriate consideration to the visual impacts of a development when viewed from the open space reserve located opposite the site.

 

The proposed changes to the overall visual presentation of the site’s development to the reserve are not considered to be unreasonable. When viewed from this location, the proposed development is moderate in scale and will not generate any undue bulk, scale, solar access or general amenity impact. Also, the materials and finishes used are consistent with the surrounding environment.

 

Therefore, in respect of the above, the aesthetic presentation of the development to the reserve is deemed to be acceptable.  

 

 

Clause 38B – Services

 

Clause 38B states that consent must not be issued to the carrying out of development on land unless access to a water supply, drainage and a sewerage system will be available.

 

The site is connected to the sewer system and reticulated water is provided. 

 

 

Part B: Aims and objectives for residential zones:

 

The development: (i) provides satisfactory levels of solar access & privacy to surrounding properties; (ii) is of a bulk, scale and design, characteristic of the area; (iii) maintains adequate levels of soft landscaping; (iv) provides suitable egress/ingress for vehicles; and (v) maintains the landscape quality of the municipality. Consequently, the aims and objectives for residential development as outlined by Schedule 9 have been satisfied.

 

 

Part C: Heritage /conservation areas:

 

Not applicable.

 

 

Draft Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan 2013

 

The draft LEP and supporting material was exhibited from 25 March 2013 to 6 May 2013. The particular aims of the draft LEP are to guide the future development of land and the management of environmental, social, economic, heritage and cultural resources within Ku-ring-gai. The subject site is located within an area identified on the statutory maps and as such the draft LEP forms a consideration for the assessment of this application.

 

As a result of the plan, the subject site will be zoned ‘R2 Low Density Residential’ and the development is permissible within this zoning. The objectives of the zone are as follows:

 

·    To provide for the housing needs of the community within a low density residential environment.

·    To enable other land uses that provide facilities or services to meet the day to day needs of residents.

·    To provide housing that is compatible with the existing environmental and low density character of Ku-ring-gai

 

The proposal has a built form which is compatible with the existing low density character of the area and the land to be developed. Therefore, the proposal meets the objectives of the draft zone.

 

 

POLICY PROVISIONS

 

Development Control Plan No. 38 - Ku-ring-gai Residential Design Manual

 

Development Control

Proposed

Complies

4.1 Streetscape:

Building setbacks (s.4.1.3)

 

 

Front setback: 12m (min)

11.8m to porch 

NO

Side setback: 

Ground floor:  3.2m (min)

 

4m  

 

YES

Rear setback:  12m(min)

5.4m

NO

4.2 Building form:

FSR (s.4.2.1)   0.3:1 (max)

0.2:1

YES

Height of building (s.4.2.2)

 

 

2 storey (max) and 8m

2 storey &  8m

YES

Building height plane (s.4.2.3)

450 from horizontal at any point 3m above boundary

Existing

N/A

First floor (s.4.2.4)

 

 

FSR: < 40% total FSR

37%

YES

Roof Line (s.4.2.6)

 

 

Roof height  (5m - single storey) (3m - two+ storey)

3m

YES

Roof pitch    350 (max)

To match existing

N/A

Built-upon area (s.4.2.7)  

50% (806m2) (max)

 

71.58%

 

Refer SEPP 1 discussion

Unrelieved wall length (s.4.2.8)

12m for walls less than 4m in height

8m for walls more than 4m in height 

 

10m

Existing

 

YES

N/A

Solar access (4.2.11) 4h solar access to adjoining properties between 9am to 3pm

Existing

N/A

Cut & fill (s.4.2.14)

 

 

Max cut 900mm

<900mm

YES

Max cut & fill across building area of 1800mm and 900mm

<1800mm

 YES

No cut or fill within side setbacks

 

YES

4.3 Open space & landscaping:

Soft landscaping area (4.3.3)

50% (806m2) (min)

 

28.42%

 

NO

Tree replenishment (s.4.3.6)

10 Trees required

 

5 existing

 

NO

Landscaping cut & fill (4.3.7)

 

 

max cut or fill 500mm relative to natural ground

<500mm

YES

no cut & fill within 2m of boundary

>2m

YES

Useable open space (s.4.3.8)

Min depth 5m and min area 50m2

 

5m depth

Area: 50m2

 

YES

YES

4.4 Privacy & security:

 Refer discussion below.

 

Part 4.1 - Streetscape:

 

Front setback:

 

The proposed front verandah does not comply with the minimum 12 metres front setback control.  However, despite the minor 200mm numerical departure, the proposed front setback is considered to be consistent with the existing character of buildings on adjoining properties.  The site has a very well established front garden setting and the new verandah’s minor encroachment does not impact on this landscaped setting or the streetscape character of the locality.

 

Rear setback

 

The site has an irregular rear boundary in that it has two discernible positions, one being on the southern side of the site, which is 38.86 metres from the front boundary, and the other being on the northern section of the site, which measures 74.81 metres from the front boundary. 

 

The rear setback control is applicable to both the north and south sections of the rear boundaries.  The northern section of the boundary complies with the required rear setback to the dwelling but the southern section does not.  Accordingly a merit based assessment has been carried out for this section as the extension of the existing living room will bring the new rumpus room to within 5.3 metres of this southern section boundary.

 

Under section 4.1.3 of DCP 38 the objectives of the setback control are to:

 

·     maintain streetscape character

•     ensure the amenity of neighbouring properties is maintained or enhanced

•     allow for the provision of landscaping and provide room for additional tree plantings to grow to maturity;

•     facilitate solar access;

•     protect significant vegetation;

•     facilitate efficient use of the site; and

•     minimise bushfire hazard by preserving a "fuel free" zone (where development is adjacent to high bushfire hazard areas).

 

Whilst the rear extension to create the rumpus room does not comply with the rear setback control, the objectives have been maintained as the neighbouring property’s amenity will not be affected with regard to privacy or any other impacts.  The boundary is well screened, as indicated below by Figure 3, and will have an additional planter box introduced along the boundary to provide additional screen planting.  Being only single storey, the extension will not impact on solar access and is proposed largely over existing paving which contains no vegetation that requires removal other than an existing garden bed.

 

Figure 3: Rear southern boundary

 

It is therefore considered that the rear extension is acceptable as it maintains the objectives of the setback control.

 

4.3 Open space & landscaping:

 

Soft landscaping area (4.3.3) and tree replenishment (4.3.6)

 

The existing built-upon area of 71.78% prevents compliance with the minimum soft landscaping requirement of 50% of the site.

 

The site supports a two storey dwelling, driveway, in-ground swimming pool and tennis court together with a significant amount of paving.  The site’s primary landscaped area is located within the front setback of the site and along the side and rear boundaries, which only allows for boundary plantings.  The site cannot therefore comply with the required 50% soft landscaping requirement or provide the replacement 5 canopy trees required by DCP 38. 

 

The site does support a number of trees and has a front landscape setting that is consistent with the streetscape character of the locality.  There is sufficient private open space at the rear that provides an area of recreation for the residents and, whilst there is a shortfall in the provision of landscaped area, it is considered that the objectives of DCP 38 have been achieved.

 

4.4 Privacy & security:

 

There will be no privacy or security impacts as a result of the proposed works.  The new window to the billiard room along the northern boundary is at single storey level and is screened by an existing brushwood fence, thereby minimising any privacy impacts to the property at 62 Bannockburn Road.  

 

The rear extension will have minimal privacy impacts to the surrounding rear properties as it is single storey, has existing screen planting along the rear southern boundary and is sufficiently distant from the private open spaces of these properties. 

 

Development Control Plan 40 – Construction and Demolition Waste Management

 

An acceptable Waste Management Plan has been submitted and further conditions are recommended to ensure appropriate practices are undertaken with regard to site management, pollution control, resource/waste management, tree protection and noise control where applicable.

 

Other stated DCPs or Policies

 

The development application is satisfactory having regard to the relevant matters for consideration under those stated DCPs or Policies as identified under the “Executive Summary” in this report.

 

LIKELY IMPACTS

 

All likely impacts have been considered. 

 

SUITABILITY OF THE SITE

 

The site is considered to be suitable for the proposed development.

 

ANY SUBMISSIONS

 

No submissions have been received.

 

PUBLIC INTEREST

 

The approval of the application is considered to be in the public interest.

 

CONCLUSION

 

Having regard to the provisions of section 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, the proposed development is considered to be satisfactory. Therefore, it is recommended that the application be approved.

 

Recommendation:

 

PURSUANT TO SECTION 80(1) OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT ACT, 1979

 

THAT the Council, as the consent authority, is of the opinion that the objection under State Environmental Planning Policy No. 1 - Development Standards to the Built-upon Area development standard in clause 60C of the Ku-ring-gai Planning Scheme Ordinance is well founded.  The Council is also of the opinion that strict compliance with the development standard is unreasonable and unnecessary in the circumstances of this case.

 

THAT the Council, as the consent authority, being satisfied that the objection under SEPP No. 1 is well founded and also being of the opinion that the granting of consent to DA0015/14 is consistent with the aims of the Policy, grant development consent to DA0015/14 for alterations and additions on land at 60 Bannockburn Road Pymble, for a period of two (2) years from the date of the Notice of Determination subject to the following conditions:

 

 

Conditions that identify approved plans:

 

1.     Approved architectural plans and documentation (new development)

 

The development must be carried out in accordance with work shown in colour on the following plans and documentation listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, except where amended by other conditions of this consent.

 

Plan no.

Drawn by

Dated

DA-01-3  DA-02-3 DA-03-3

Bean Project Management Pty Ltd

13.12.13

 

Document(s)

Dated

Colours and finishes schedule

December 2013

Basix certificate No. A178318

11 December 2013

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

2.     Inconsistency between documents

 

In the event of any inconsistency between conditions of this consent and the drawings/documents referred to above, the conditions of this consent prevail.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

3.     No demolition of extra fabric

 

Alterations to, and demolition of the existing building shall be limited to that documented on the approved plans (by way of notation). No approval is given or implied for removal and/or rebuilding of any portion of the existing building which is shown to be retained.

 

Reason:         To ensure compliance with the development consent.

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to demolition, excavation or construction:

 

4.     Asbestos works

 

All work involving asbestos products and materials, including asbestos-cement-sheeting (ie. Fibro), must be carried out in accordance with the guidelines for asbestos work published by WorkCover Authority of NSW.

 

Reason:         To ensure public safety.

 

5.     Notice of commencement

 

At least 48 hours prior to the commencement of any development (including demolition, excavation, shoring or underpinning works), a notice of commencement of building or subdivision work form and appointment of the principal certifying authority form shall be submitted to Council.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

6.     Notification of builder’s details

 

Prior to the commencement of any development or excavation works, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be notified in writing of the name and contractor licence number of the owner/builder intending to carry out the approved works.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of the construction certificate:

 

7.     Long service levy

 

In accordance with Section 109F(i) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act a Construction Certificate shall not be issued until any long service levy payable under Section 34 of the Building and Construction Industry Long Service Payments Act 1986 (or where such levy is payable by instalments, the first instalment of the levy) has been paid. Council is authorised to accept payment. Where payment has been made elsewhere, proof of payment is to be provided to Council.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

8.     Builder’s indemnity insurance

 

The applicant, builder, developer or person who does the work on this development, must arrange builder’s indemnity insurance and submit the certificate of insurance in accordance with the requirements of Part 6 of the Home Building Act 1989 to the Certifying Authority for endorsement of the plans accompanying the Construction Certificate.

 

It is the responsibility of the applicant, builder or developer to arrange the builder's indemnity insurance for residential building work over the value of $20,000. The builder's indemnity insurance does not apply to commercial or industrial building work or to residential work valued at less than $20,000, nor to work undertaken by persons holding an owner/builder's permit issued by the Department of Fair Trading (unless the owner/builder's property is sold within 7 years of the commencement of the work).

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

9.     Excavation for services

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that no proposed underground services (ie: water, sewerage, drainage, gas or other service) unless previously approved by conditions of consent, are located beneath the canopy of any tree protected under Council’s Tree Preservation Order, located on the subject allotment and adjoining allotments.

 

Note:     A plan detailing the routes of these services and trees protected under the Tree Preservation Order shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:         To ensure the protection of trees.

 

10.   Screen planting plan

 

A plan detailing screen planting of the extension in the proposed garden bed located  along the rear south-western boundary shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority and approved by a Landscape Architect or qualified Landscape Designer prior to release of the Construction Certificate. The plan shall incorporate species of type suitable for the site conditions and location on site, of 25L size capable of attaining a height of
3 metres and be maintained at a height of 3 metres.

 

Reason:        To ensure adequate landscaping of the site.

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of the construction certificate or prior to demolition, excavation or construction (whichever comes first):

 

11.   Infrastructure restorations fee

 

To ensure that damage to Council Property as a result of construction activity is rectified in a timely matter:

 

a)      All work or activity taken in furtherance of the development the subject of this approval must be undertaken in a manner to avoid damage to Council Property and must not jeopardise the safety of any person using or occupying the adjacent public areas.

 

b)      The applicant, builder, developer or any person acting in reliance on this approval shall be responsible for making good any damage to Council Property, and for the removal from Council Property of any waste bin, building materials, sediment, silt, or any other material or article.

 

c)      The Infrastructure Restoration Fee must be paid to the Council by the applicant prior to both the issue of the Construction Certificate and the commencement of any earthworks or construction.

 

d)      In consideration of payment of the Infrastructure Restorations Fee, Council will undertake such inspections of Council Property as Council considers necessary and also undertake, on behalf of the applicant, such restoration work to Council Property, if any, that Council considers necessary as a consequence of the development. The provision of such restoration work by the Council does not absolve any person of the responsibilities contained in (a) to (b) above. Restoration work to be undertaken by the Council referred to in this condition is limited to work that can be undertaken by Council at a cost of not more than the Infrastructure Restorations Fee payable pursuant to this condition.

 

e)      In this condition:

 

“Council Property” includes any road, footway, footpath paving, kerbing, guttering, crossings, street furniture, seats, letter bins, trees, shrubs, lawns, mounds, bushland, and similar structures or features on any road or public road within the meaning of the Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) or any public place; and

 

“Infrastructure Restoration Fee” means the Infrastructure Restorations Fee calculated in accordance with the Schedule of Fees & Charges adopted by Council as at the date of payment and the cost of any inspections required by the Council of Council Property associated with this condition.

 

Reason:         To maintain public infrastructure.

 

Conditions to be satisfied during the demolition, excavation and construction phases:

 

12.   Road opening permit

 

The opening of any footway, roadway, road shoulder or any part of the road reserve shall not be carried out without a road opening permit being obtained from Council (upon payment of the required fee) beforehand.

 

Reason:       Statutory requirement (Roads Act 1993 Section 138) and to maintain the integrity of Council’s infrastructure.

 

13.   Prescribed conditions

 

The applicant shall comply with any relevant prescribed conditions of development consent under clause 98 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation. For the purposes of section 80A (11) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, the following conditions are prescribed in relation to a development consent for development that involves any building work:

 

·       The work must be carried out in accordance with the requirements of the Building Code of Australia

·       In the case of residential building work for which the Home Building Act 1989 requires there to be a contract of insurance in force in accordance with Part 6 of that Act, that such a contract of insurance is in force before any works commence.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

14.   Hours of work

 

Demolition, excavation, construction work and deliveries of building material and equipment must not take place outside the hours of 7.00am to 5.00pm Monday to Friday and 8.00am to 12 noon Saturday. No work and no deliveries are to take place on Sundays and public holidays.

 

Excavation or removal of any materials using machinery of any kind, including compressors and jack hammers, must be limited to between 7.30am and 5.00pm Monday to Friday, with a respite break of 45 minutes between 12 noon 1.00pm.

 

Where it is necessary for works to occur outside of these hours (ie) placement of concrete for large floor areas on large residential/commercial developments or where building processes require the use of oversized trucks and/or cranes that are restricted by the RTA from travelling during daylight hours to deliver, erect or remove machinery, tower cranes, pre-cast panels, beams, tanks or service equipment to or from the site, approval for such activities will be subject to the issue of an "outside of hours works permit" from Council as well as notification of the surrounding properties likely to be affected by the proposed works.

 

Note:              Failure to obtain a permit to work outside of the approved hours will result in on the spot fines being issued.

 

Reason:         To ensure reasonable standards of amenity for occupants of neighbouring properties.

 

15.   Approved plans to be on site

 

A copy of all approved and certified plans, specifications and documents incorporating conditions of consent and certification (including the Construction Certificate if required for the work) shall be kept on site at all times during the demolition, excavation and construction phases and must be readily available to any officer of Council or the Principal Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

16.   Statement of compliance with Australian Standards

 

The demolition work shall comply with the provisions of Australian Standard AS2601: 2001 The Demolition of Structures. The work plans required by AS2601: 2001 shall be accompanied by a written statement from a suitably qualified person that the proposal contained in the work plan comply with the safety requirements of the Standard. The work plan and the statement of compliance shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the commencement of any works.

 

Reason:         To ensure compliance with the Australian Standards.

 

17.   Site notice

 

A site notice shall be erected on the site prior to any work commencing and shall be displayed throughout the works period.

 

The site notice must:

 

·          be prominently displayed at the boundaries of the site for the purposes of informing the public that unauthorised entry to the site is not permitted

·          display project details including, but not limited to the details of the builder, Principal Certifying Authority and structural engineer

·          be durable and weatherproof

·          display the approved hours of work, the name of the site/project manager, the responsible managing company (if any), its address and 24 hour contact phone number for any inquiries, including construction/noise complaint are to be displayed on the site notice

·          be mounted at eye level on the perimeter hoardings/fencing and is to state that unauthorised entry to the site is not permitted

 

Reason:         To ensure public safety and public information.

 

18.   Dust control

 

During excavation, demolition and construction, adequate measures shall be taken to prevent dust from affecting the amenity of the neighbourhood. The following measures must be adopted:

 

·          physical barriers shall be erected at right angles to the prevailing wind direction or shall be placed around or over dust sources to prevent wind or activity from generating dust

·          earthworks and scheduling activities shall be managed to coincide with the next stage of development to minimise the amount of time the site is left cut or exposed

·          all materials shall be stored or stockpiled at the best locations

·          the ground surface should be dampened slightly to prevent dust from becoming airborne but should not be wet to the extent that run-off occurs

·          all vehicles carrying spoil or rubble to or from the site shall at all times be covered to prevent the escape of dust

·          all equipment wheels shall be washed before exiting the site using manual or automated sprayers and drive-through washing bays

·          gates shall be closed between vehicle movements and shall be fitted with shade cloth

·          cleaning of footpaths and roadways shall be carried out daily

 

Reason:         To protect the environment and amenity of surrounding properties.

 

19.   Use of road, nature strip or footpath

 

During excavation, demolition and construction phases, no building materials, plant or the like are to be stored on the road, nature strip or footpath without written approval being obtained from Council beforehand.  The pathway shall be kept in a clean, tidy and safe condition during building operations.  Council reserves the right, without notice, to rectify any such breach and to charge the cost against the applicant/owner/builder, as the case may be.

 

Reason:         To ensure safety and amenity of the area.

 

20.   Guarding excavations

 

All excavation, demolition and construction works shall be properly guarded and protected with hoardings or fencing to prevent them from being dangerous to life and property.

 

Reason:         To ensure public safety.

 

21.   Toilet facilities

 

During excavation, demolition and construction phases, toilet facilities are to be provided, on the work site, at the rate of one toilet for every 20 persons or part of 20 persons employed at the site.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

22.   Protection of public places

 

If the work involved in the erection, demolition or construction of the development is likely to cause pedestrian or vehicular traffic in a public place to be obstructed or rendered inconvenient, or building involves the enclosure of a public place, a hoarding or fence must be erected between the work site and the public place.

 

If necessary, a hoarding is to be erected, sufficient to prevent any substance from, or in connection with, the work falling into the public place.

 

The work site must be kept lit between sunset and sunrise if it is likely to be hazardous to persons in the public place.

 

Any hoarding, fence or awning is to be removed when the work has been completed.

 

Reason:         To protect public places.

 

23.   Recycling of building material (general)

 

During demolition and construction, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that building materials suitable for recycling have been forwarded to an appropriate registered business dealing in recycling of materials. Materials to be recycled must be kept in good order.

 

Reason:         To facilitate recycling of materials.

 

24.   Construction signage

 

All construction signs must comply with the following requirements:

 

·          are not to cover any mechanical ventilation inlet or outlet vent

·          are not illuminated, self-illuminated or flashing at any time

·          are located wholly within a property where construction is being undertaken

·          refer only to the business(es) undertaking the construction and/or the site at which the construction is being undertaken

·          are restricted to one such sign per property

·          do not exceed 2.5m2

·          are removed within 14 days of the completion of all construction works

 

Reason:         To ensure compliance with Council's controls regarding signage.

 

25.   Road reserve safety

 

All public footways and roadways fronting and adjacent to the site must be maintained in a safe condition at all times during the course of the development works. Construction materials must not be stored in the road reserve. A safe pedestrian circulation route and a pavement/route free of trip hazards must be maintained at all times on or adjacent to any public access ways fronting the construction site.  Where public infrastructure is damaged, repair works must be carried out when and as directed by Council officers. Where pedestrian circulation is diverted on to the roadway or verge areas, clear directional signage and protective barricades must be installed in accordance with AS1742-3 (1996) “Traffic Control Devices for Work on Roads”. If pedestrian circulation is not satisfactorily maintained across the site frontage, and action is not taken promptly to rectify the defects, Council may undertake proceedings to stop work.

 

Reason:         To ensure safe public footways and roadways during construction.

 

26.   Services

 

Where required, the adjustment or inclusion of any new utility service facilities must be carried out by the applicant and in accordance with the requirements of the relevant utility authority. These works shall be at no cost to Council. It is the applicants’ full responsibility to make contact with the relevant utility authorities to ascertain the impacts of the proposal upon utility services (including water, phone, gas and the like). Council accepts no responsibility for any matter arising from its approval to this application involving any influence upon utility services provided by another authority.

 

Reason:         Provision of utility services.

 

27.   Erosion control

 

Temporary sediment and erosion control and measures are to be installed prior to the commencement of any works on the site. These measures must be maintained in working order during construction works up to completion. All sediment traps must be cleared on a regular basis and after each major storm and/or as directed by the Principal Certifying Authority and Council officers.

 

Reason:         To protect the environment from erosion and sedimentation.

 

28.   Drainage to existing system

 

Stormwater runoff from all new impervious areas and subsoil drainage systems shall be piped to the existing site drainage system. The installation of new drainage components must be completed by a licensed contractor in accordance with AS3500.3 (Plumbing Code) and the BCA. No stormwater runoff is to be placed into the Sydney Water sewer system. If an illegal sewer connection is found during construction, the drainage system must be rectified to the satisfaction of Council and Sydney Water.

 

Reason:         To protect the environment.

 

29.   Treatment of tree roots

 

If tree roots are required to be severed for the purposes of constructing the approved works, they shall be cut cleanly by hand, by an experienced Arborist/Horticulturist with a minimum qualification of Horticulture Certificate or Tree Surgery Certificate.  All pruning works shall be undertaken as specified in Australian Standard 4373-2007 - Pruning of Amenity Trees.

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees.

 

30.   No storage of materials beneath trees

 

No activities, storage or disposal of materials shall take place beneath the canopy of any tree protected under Council's Tree Preservation Order at any time.

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees.

 

31.   Removal of refuse

 

All builders' refuse, spoil and/or material unsuitable for use in landscape areas shall be removed from the site on completion of the building works.

 

Reason:         To protect the environment.

 

32.   On site retention of waste dockets

 

All demolition, excavation and construction waste dockets are to be retained on site, or at suitable location, in order to confirm which facility received materials generated from the site for recycling or disposal.

 

·          Each docket is to be an official receipt from a facility authorised to accept the material type, for disposal or processing.

·          This information is to be made available at the request of an Authorised Officer of Council.

 

Reason:       To protect the environment.

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate:

 

33.   Compliance with BASIX Certificate

 

Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that all commitments listed in BASIX Certificate No. A178318 have been complied with.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

 

34.   Completion of landscape works

 

Prior to the release of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that all landscape works, including the removal of all noxious and/or environmental weed species, have been undertaken in accordance with the approved plan(s) and conditions of consent.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the landscape works are consistent with the development consent.

 

 

35.   Infrastructure repair

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority must be satisfied that any damaged public infrastructure caused as a result of construction works (including damage caused by, but not limited to, delivery vehicles, waste collection, contractors, sub-contractors, concrete vehicles) is fully repaired to the satisfaction of Council Development Engineer and at no cost to Council.

 

Reason:         To protect public infrastructure.

 

 

36.   Swimming pool (part 1)

 

Prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that:

 

C1

1.       Access to the pool/spa shall be restricted by a child resistant barrier in accordance with the regulations prescribed in the Swimming Pools Act, 1992:

 

(a)     The pool shall not be filled with water or be allowed to collect stormwater until the child resistant barrier is installed; and

(b)     The barrier is to conform to the requirements of AS 1926-1 2012 Fences and Gates for Private Swimming Pools.

 

Reason:         To ensure the safety of children.

 

2.       Any mechanical equipment associated with the swimming pool and/or spa pool shall be located in a sound-attenuating enclosure and positioned so that it is setback a minimum of 2m from the boundary of any adjoining premises. The Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the sound levels associated with the swimming pool/spa filtration system and associated mechanical equipment do not exceed 5dB(A) above the background noise level at the boundaries of the site.

 

Reason:         To protect the amenity of surrounding properties.

 

Conditions to be satisfied at all times:

 

37.   Swimming pool (part 2)

 

At all times:

 

1.       Access to the swimming pool must be restricted by fencing or other measures as required by the Swimming Pools Act 1992.

2.       Noise levels associated with spa/pool pumping units shall not exceed 5dB(A) above the background noise level at the boundaries of the site.

3.       Devices or structures used for heating swimming pool water must not be placed where they are visible from a public place.

4.       For the purpose of health and amenity, the disposal of backwash and/or the emptying of a swimming pool into a reserve, watercourse, easement or storm water drainage system is prohibited. These waters are to discharge via a permanent drainage line into Sydney Water's sewer in accordance with Australian Standard AS3500.2 section 10.9. Permission is to be obtained from Sydney Water prior to the emptying of any pool to the sewer.

5.       Lighting from the swimming pool and other communal facilities shall not detrimentally impact the amenity of other premises and adjacent dwellings.

 

Reason:         Health and amenity.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Natalie Piggott-Herridge

Development Assessment Officer

 

 

 

 

Selwyn Segall

Team Leader - Development Assessment North

 

 

 

 

Richard Kinninmont

Team Leader- Development Assessment - Central

 

 

 

 

Michael Miocic

Director Development & Regulation

 

 

Attachments:

A1View

Floor plans

 

2014/017021

 

A2View

Site analysis

 

2014/017022

 

A3View

Elevations

 

2014/017017

 

A4View

SEPP 1 objection

 

2014/016995

 

A5View

Zoning

 

2014/077742

 

A6View

Location sketch

 

2014/077743

 

A7View

Planning circular

 

2014/092078

  


APPENDIX No: 1 - Floor plans

 

Item No: GB.4

 


APPENDIX No: 2 - Site analysis

 

Item No: GB.4

 


APPENDIX No: 3 - Elevations

 

Item No: GB.4

 


APPENDIX No: 4 - SEPP 1 objection

 

Item No: GB.4

 


 


 


 


APPENDIX No: 5 - Zoning

 

Item No: GB.4

 


APPENDIX No: 6 - Location sketch

 

Item No: GB.4

 


APPENDIX No: 7 - Planning circular

 

Item No: GB.4

 


 


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 29 April 2014

GB.5 / 225

 

 

Item GB.5

DA0344/13

 

16 April 2014

 

 

development application

 

 

Summary Sheet

 

Report title:

35 Ivey Street, Lindfield - Extension to rear balcony and new deck and spa at ground floor level

ITEM/AGENDA NO:

GB.5

 

 

Application No:

DA0344/13

Property Details:

35 Ivey Street, Lindfield

Lot & DP No:      Lot 13 DP 13408

Site area (m2):   1082m2

Zoning:               Residential 2(a)

Ward:

Roseville

 

Proposal/Purpose:

Extension to rear balcony and new deck and spa at ground floor level

Type of Consent:

Local

Applicant:

Payman Tajalli

Owner:

Payman Tajalli and Nina Tajalli

Date Lodged:

17/09/2013

Recommendation:

Approval

 

 

  

 


Purpose of Report

 

To determine Development Application No.0344/13, for an extension to the rear balcony at the first floor level and construction of a new deck and spa at the ground floor level of an existing dwelling house at 35 Ivey Street, Lindfield.

 

Consideration of variation pursuant to SEPP No. 1

 

Council’s attention is directed to Planning Circular PS 08-014 from the NSW Department of Planning (attached) concerning the determination by Council of Development Applications where a variation of a development standard is sought under the provisions of SEPP No. 1.

 

The circular requires all development applications which involve a variation greater than 10% under the provisions of SEPP No. 1 be determined by full Council and not by Council staff under delegated authority.

 

The application involves a variation greater than 10% to a development standard and must be determined by full Council.

 

Executive Summary

 

Issues:                                                     Height of building (SEPP No. 1 variation greater than 10%)

 

Submissions:                                 Two submissions received

 

Land & Environment Court Appeal: N/A

 

History

 

Site

 

Council’s records indicate that the site has historically been used for residential purposes.

 

Pre-DA

 

No pre-DA consultation was undertaken by the applicant prior to the lodgement of this development application.

 

Development applications

 

DA No.

Proposal

Determination and date

DA0931/13

Extend existing deck on upper level and construct new deck on lower level incorporating spa.

The application was withdrawn on 09 February 2011.

DA0365/03

New two storey dwelling

Approved, 18 July 2003.

DA0365/03A

Section 96 to DA0365/03

modification to stormwater system.

Approved, 10 October 2003.

 

Current DA history

 

17 September 2013

The application was lodged.

 

 

20 September 2013

The application was notified to the owners of surrounding properties.

A referral was made to the Rural Fire Service.

 

 

30 September 2013

A submission was received from Louise and Peter McCallum from 37 Ivey Street Lindfield.

 

 

02 October 2013

A submission was received from Mark Faigan at 33 Ivey Street Lindfield.

 

 

10 October 2013

Council received comment from the Rural Fire Service.

 

 

14 November 2013

Council requested additional information and amended plans.

 

 

27 November 2013

The applicant requested an extension of time for submitting amended plans.

 

 

10 December 2013

Amended plans received.

 

 

15 January 2014

The applicant was advised that a SEPP No.1 objection is required.

 

 

22 January 2014

The applicant was advised that the SEPP No.1 submitted on the 16 January 2014 was unacceptable.

 

 

24 January 2014

A revised SEPP No.1 was submitted.

 

The Site

 

Site description

 

The subject property is described as 35 Ivey Street, Lindfield. The subject site has a frontage of 17.07 metres and is located on the south- western side of Ivey Street. The site is rectangular in shape, with northern and southern side boundaries of approximately 63.4 metres in length. The site has a total area of 1082sqm. The subject site has an approximate fall of 13 metres from the front boundary (RL66.00) down to the rear boundary (RL53.00).

 

The site backs onto the Sir Phillip Game Reserve and is situated within a bushfire buffer zone.

 

Currently the site contains a two and three storey dwelling house with a double garage at the south-eastern elevation of the dwelling.

 

Surrounding development

 

The surrounding development mainly consists of single dwelling houses.

 

The Proposal

 

The application involves alterations and additions to the rear of the existing dwelling house including the following:

 

·    new covered deck at the ground floor and first floor at the rear of the existing dwelling

·    new spa at the north-western side of the new deck

 

Consultation

 

Community

 

In accordance with Development Control Plan No. 56, owners of surrounding properties were given notice of the application. In response, submissions were received from the following:

 

1.       Mark Faigan, 33 Ivey Street Lindfield

2.       Louise & Peter McCallum, 37 Ivey Street Lindfield

 

The submissions raised the following issues:

 

Noise impact

 

The proposed deck and spa are ancillary to the existing dwelling. The noise impacts associated with a spa and deck are considered to be something that would be anticipated under the residential zoning of the site. The proposed spa is well set back from the adjoining property, with a side setback of 2.69 metres from the south-western boundary which exceeds the 2 metres side setback requirement for a pool/ spa. The noise impacts generated from the deck and spa are considered reasonable and will not adversely impact on the amenity of adjoining properties. Council’s Health & Environmental Officer indicated that the standard conditions for swimming pool/spas would be adequate to ensure noise generated from the spa and the equipment will be limited to a reasonable level. (Conditions 34 and 36)

 

Privacy impact

 

The first floor balcony is approximately 6.7 metres from the adjoining property at No. 37 Ivey Street. As part of the revised plans, a 1.6 metres high privacy screen (solid balustrade with glass block) is now proposed along the south-eastern elevation of the balcony to preclude privacy impacts on the neighbouring properties.

 

Loss of view

 

Concern over likely loss of views has been expressed by  owner of No. 37 Ivey Street. This property is located to the south of the subject site, aligning the southern side boundary. Specifically, the objector raises concern that the proposed development will obstruct existing views of the adjacent bushland reserve from the rear of the adjacent property. This bushland is located to the west of the adjacent property (see Figure 1 below).

 

 

Figure 1 – showing the subject site (No. 35 Ivey Street) highlighted. No. 37 Ivey Street adjoins to the south.

 

With regard to impacts on view loss, a planning principle has been developed by the NSW Land and Environmental Court (Tenacity Consulting v Warringah [2004] NSWLEC 140). The principle notes that views from the side boundaries are more difficult to protect than views from front and rear boundaries and the expectation to retain side views is often unrealistic. This is of particular relevance in this instance as the proposed development will only be visible from No. 37 Ivey Street when viewed across the side boundary. The proposal will not have any impact on the views currently enjoyed by 35 Ivey Street of the adjacent bushland to west or south of the property. Moreover, the proposed development provides a substantial rear setback of more than 25 metres and, as such, a substantial portion of the bushland views currently available to the north-west will remain unobstructed.

 

It is also noted that the existing views are classified as ‘district views’ under the Court’s planning principle and that the proposed development will not obstruct any views that could be considered as iconic. Therefore, given the view corridors that will remain available to the adjacent property and that the proposed development will not obstruct any current views considered to be of an exceptional quality, the application is assessed as acceptable with regard to views.

 

Current impacts from lighting of the existing dwelling, noise from downpipes during heavy rainfall and previous construction works

 

The abovementioned concerns are not matters that are related to the current application. These are civil matters beyond Council’s jurisdiction.

 

INTERNAL REFERRALS

 

Landscaping

 

Council’s Landscape and Tree Assessment Officer supports the development.

 

Engineering

 

Council’s Development Engineer has no objections to the proposal.

 

exTERNAL REFERRALS

 

Rural Fire Service

 

In accordance with the provisions of section 79BA of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, Council has consulted with the Commissioner of the NSW Rural Fire Service concerning measures to be taken with respect to the protection of persons, property and the environment from danger that may arise from a bush fire. The RFS supports the proposal, subject to a condition intended to protect the property from the threat of bushfire (Conditions No. 6).

 

 

Statutory Provisions

 

 

State Environmental Planning Policy No. 55 - Remediation of Land

 

The provisions of SEPP 55 require Council to consider the potential for a site to be contaminated. The subject site has a history of residential use and, as such, it is unlikely to contain any contamination and further investigation is not warranted in this case.

 

 

Sydney Regional Environmental Planning Policy (Sydney Harbour Catchment) 2005

 

SREP 2005 applies to the site as the site is located in the Sydney Harbour Catchment. The Planning Principles in Part 2 of the SREP must be considered in the preparation of environmental planning instruments, development control plans, environmental studies and master plans. The proposal is not affected by the provisions of the SREP which relate to the assessment of development applications as the site is not located in the Foreshores and Waterways Area as defined by the Foreshores and Waterways Area Map.

 

 

State Environmental Planning Policy (Building Sustainability Index: BASIX) 2004

 

A valid BASIX certificate has been submitted. The certificate demonstrates compliance with the provisions of the SEPP.

 

Ku-ring-gai Planning Scheme Ordinance

 

Part A: Development standards

 

Development standard

Proposed

Complies

Mimimum size allotments

Site area:  790m2 (min)

 

1082m2 (existing)

 

YES

Building height 8m (max)

9.6m (existing dwelling)

No – Refer to SEPP 1 assessment below

Built upon area

60% (649.2m2) (max)

37% (400.56m2)

YES

 

State Environmental Planning Policy No 1 - Objection to Development Standards

 

Where there is a variation to a development standard, the application must be accompanied by a SEPP 1 Objection, a written objection stating that compliance with that development standard is unreasonable or unnecessary in the circumstances of the case, and specifying the grounds of that objection.

 

The proposed alterations and additions to the dwelling do not alter the existing overall height of dwelling house which is 9.6 metres at the rear.

 

A SEPP No. 1 objection has been submitted by the applicant and is assessed as follows:

 

Height of buildings (clause 46):

 

Clause 46 of the Ku-ring-gai Planning Scheme Ordinance (KPSO), a statutory planning instrument, states:

 

(1) Notwithstanding the provisions of part III of this Ordinance, a building shall not be erected to a height, across any point of a site, which is greater than 7 metres without the consent of the council.

 

(2) A person shalt not erect a dwelling-house or dual occupancy building with a height in excess of 8 metres.

 

(3) Subclause (2) does not enable a second dwelling-house erected on an allotment to exceed a height of 3.6 metres in contravention of clause 11 of Sydney Regional Environmental Plan No 12 - Dual Occupancy.

 

This clause of the KPSO provides the following definition for height of buildings:

 

Ground level” means the level of a site before development is carried out on the site under this Ordinance.

 

“Height” in relation to a building, means a distance measured vertically from any point on the ceiling of the topmost floor of the building to the ground level immediately below that point.

 

The proposed development is located at the rear of the existing dwelling which has a maximum height of 9.6m and does not comply with the 8m requirement under the KPSO. The non-compliance with the development standard in Clause 46 of the KPSO necessitates the lodgement of a SEPP1 objection. An objection has been submitted and is assessed as follows:

 

Whether the planning control in question is a development standard.

 

Part VII Clause 46 (2) (building height) of the KPSO restricts the land on which dwelling houses are constructed to a maximum building height of 8m. As the KPSO is a statutory planning instrument, this control is considered to be a development standard as defined under Section 4 of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act, 1979.

 

The underlying objective or purpose behind the standard

 

The objectives of clause 46 are unstated in the KPSO.

 

The relevant specific Aims and Objectives for Residential Zones as stated in schedule 9 of the KPSO are as follows:

 

(e)     all new dwelling-houses and additions to existing dwelling-houses are of a height, size and bulk generally in keeping with that of neighbouring properties and, where larger buildings are proposed, they are designed so as not to dominate and so far as possible to harmonise with neighbouring development;

 

A similar objective is included in section 4.2 of DCP No. 38 which states:

 

To ensure that the bulk, scale and height of the proposed works do not dominate the natural landscape, existing streetscape, nor adversely impact on the tree canopy vista.

 

Whether compliance with the development standard is consistent with the aims of the Policy and whether compliance tends to hinder the attainment of the objects specified in section 5(a)(i) and (ii) of the EP & A ACT 1979.

 

The aim of SEPP 1 is to:

 

Provide flexibility in the application of planning controls operating by virtue of development standards in circumstances where strict compliance with those standards would, in any particular case, be unreasonable or unnecessary or tend to hinder the attainment of the objects specified in Section 5(a) (ii) and (ii) of the Act.

 

The objectives of Section 5(a)(i) and (ii) of the act are:

 

(a)     To encourage:

 

(i)      the proper management, development and conservation of natural and artificial resources, including agricultural land, natural areas, forests, minerals, water, cities, towns and villages for the purpose of promoting the social and economic welfare of the community and a better environment;

 

(ii)     the promotion and co-ordination of the orderly and economic use and development of land.

 

It is considered that compliance with the development standard is not consistent with the aims of SEPP 1 as it is unreasonable and unnecessary in this instance (as discussed below). In this particular circumstance, compliance with the development standard would hinder the attainment of the objectives specified in Section 5(a) (i) and (ii) of the Act.

 

Whether compliance with the development standard is unreasonable or unnecessary in the circumstance.

 

The applicant has put forward the following arguments in support of the variation to the development standard:

 

The constructed house and the building height of this existing dwelling are in accordance with the DA plans approved by the Council in 2003. The final certificate of completion/occupancy for the house was issued by the Council in early 2005.

 

It would be very unreasonable to attempt to comply with the standard at this time that is, to somehow reduce the height of this dwelling which was constructed nearly 10 years ago and in accordance with the approved DA.

 

The proposed addition of a new deck, for which this current DA has now been lodged, does not change anything on the existing building, including the building height.

 

Whether the objection is well founded.

 

The proposed non-compliance is the product of existing development on the site and will not be increased by the alterations and additions proposed under this development application. For these reasons and those listed above, the objection is considered to be well founded and it is agreed that compliance with the standard is unreasonable and unnecessary in the circumstances of the case.

 

Whether non -compliance with the development standard raises any matter of significance for State or regional environmental planning, and

 

There are no matters of significance for State or regional environmental planning.

 

Whether there is public benefit of maintaining the planning controls adopted by the environmental planning instrument.

 

The development standard for the building height within the site is consistent with the development outcomes promoted by the Ku-ring-gai Planning Scheme Ordinance. There is public benefit in maintaining this planning control but, in this instance, requiring compliance would not be considered reasonable.

 

Aesthetic appearance to public reserve (Clause 33(a))

 

Clause 33(a) of the KPSO requires Council to consider the probable aesthetic appearance of the proposed works when viewed from a public reserve adjacent to the site.

 

The proposed alterations to the existing dwelling are considered to enhance the visual appearance of the dwelling when viewed from the public reserve and in keeping with the overall desirable elements of the current character of the area. In this respect, the proposed works are considered to satisfy the requirements under this clause.

 

Part B: Aims and objectives for residential zones:

 

The development: (i) provides satisfactory levels of solar access and privacy to surrounding properties; (ii) is of a bulk, scale and design, characteristic of the area; (iii) maintains adequate levels of soft landscaping; (iv) provides suitable egress/ingress for vehicles; and (v) maintains the landscape quality of the municipality. Consequently, the aims and objectives for residential development as outlined by Schedule 9 have been satisfied.

 

Part C: Heritage /conservation areas:

 

The subject site is not listed as a heritage item nor is it situated within a heritage conservation area.

 

Draft Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan 2013

 

The draft comprehensive Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan 2013 is also a matter for consideration. This DLEP seeks to replace the Ku-ring-gai Planning Scheme Ordinance by bringing the principal planning instrument of the LGA in line with the intended standard instrument.

 

Of key note, the Draft LEP seeks to rezone the subject site to R2 - Low Density Residential. The works are permissible as ancillary to a dwelling house. While the existing house exceeds the maximum 9.5 metres building height development standard proposed under the LEP, the proposed works do not. The impacts associated with the height of the development are not considered to be unreasonable.

 

The proposed works are also consistent with the provisions of the draft instrument in all other respects.

 

Policy Provisions (DCPs, Council policies, strategies and management plans)

 

Development Control Plan No. 38 – Ku-ring-gai Residential Design Manual

 

Development Control

Proposed

Complies

4.1 Streetscape:

Building setbacks (s.4.1.3)

 

 

Front setback: 11m (Ave) -75% front elevation 9m (min) - 25% front elevation

 No proposed work located at the front of the dwelling

 YES

Side setback: 

Ground floor: 2m(min)

1st floor:  2.56m (min)

 

2.1m

2.1m (balcony)

 

YES

NO

Rear setback:  12m(min)

25.2m

YES

4.2 Building form:

FSR (s.4.2.1)   0.357:1 (max)

0.42:1

NO

Height of building (s.4.2.2)

 

 

2 storey (max) and 8m (site >200 slope) or 7m (site <200 slope)

2 storey & 

9.6m (existing dwelling)

YES

NO- refer to the SEPP 1 assessment above

Building height plane (s.4.2.3) 450 from horizontal at any point 3m above boundary

 

YES

First floor (s.4.2.4)

 

 

FSR: < 40% total FSR

38%

YES

Roof Line (s.4.2.6)

 

 

Roof height  (5m - single storey) (3m - two+ storey)

300mm

YES

Roof pitch    350 (max)

Flat roof (pergola)

YES

Built-upon area (s.4.2.7)   52% (562.64m2) (max)

37% (400.56m2)

YES

Unrelieved wall length (s.4.2.8) 12m (min)

15.5m (existing dwelling)

YES

Solar access (4.2.11) 4h solar access to adjoining properties between 9am to 3pm

The proposed deck is an open structure and will not impose adverse

YES

Cut & fill (s.4.2.14)

 

 

Max cut 900mm

No proposed cut and fill

YES

4.3 Open space & landscaping:

Soft landscaping area (4.3.3) 48% (519.36m2) (min)

63% (681.66m2)

YES

Tree replenishment (s.4.3.6) 7 Trees required

Not required

YES

Landscaping cut & fill (4.3.7)

 

 

max cut or fill 500mm relative to natural ground

No proposed landscape cut and fill

YES

no cut & fill within 2m of boundary

 

 

Useable open space (s.4.3.8) Min depth 5m and min area 50m2

Depth 7m      

Area 95.9m2

YES

YES

4.4 Privacy & security:

Refer discussion below.

4.5 Access & parking:

No. of car parking spaces (s.4.5.1) 2 spaces behind building line

Existing

YES

Driveway width (s.4.5.6)  3.5m

3.6m

YES

4.6 Ancillary facilities:

Swimming pools (s.4.6.1)

 

 

Setback from boundary:  2m

2.65m

YES

Pool coping <500mm above ground level

1.127m (Spa)

NO

Pool excavation not below the canopy of trees

 

YES

 

Part 4.1 - Streetscape:

 

First floor side setback (balcony)

 

The proposed first floor balcony is set back 2.1 metres from the south-eastern side boundary and does not comply with the 2.56 metres side setback control. The non-compliance can be supported as the proposed balcony is a semi open structure with flat pergola roofing that would not result in any undue bulk and scale impacts upon the streetscape or neighbouring properties. The proposed development incorporates consistent first floor setbacks to those of existing developments within the visual catchment of the site. A 1.6 metres glass block privacy screen is proposed along the south-eastern elevation of the balcony to preclude overlooking onto the private open space or living areas of the adjoining properties. The proposed development will not cause any adverse impacts upon the solar access, privacy or general amenity of neighbouring properties.

 

In respect of these factors, the proposed development is considered to satisfy the objectives stated by this section of the DCP.

 

Part 4.2 - Building form:

 

Floor space ratio

 

The extension of the balcony at the first floor will increase the floor space ratio by 22.20m2 and will result in a total floor space ratio of 0.42:1. The proposed development does not comply with the floor space ratio of 0.357:1 as specified under the DCP No. 38. The purpose of the DCP control is to limit the impact of bulk and scale on adjoining properties. In this respect, the non-compliance would be acceptable, as whilst strictly calculable as floor space ratio, the balcony is an open structure and will not present the same bulk as solid enclosed walls. The proposed development incorporates a variety of architectural measures that break-up the side elevations of the building to minimise bulk, scale and visual impacts upon the neighbouring properties.

 

Part 4.4 - Privacy and security

 

The proposed development will retain sufficient visual and acoustic privacy to the sensitive areas of the neighbouring properties for the following reasons:

 

i.        The extension of the balcony at the first floor is unlikely to allow for overlooking of the private open space or living area of the adjoining property at No. 37 Ivey Street as a 1.6 metres privacy screen will be installed along the south- eastern elevation of the balcony.

 

ii.       The proposed deck at the ground floor is situated two metres above the natural ground level and has the potential of allow for overlooking into the adjoining property at the south-eastern side. To ensure there is no privacy impact to the private open space of the adjoining property at No. 37 Ivey Street, it is recommended that a 1.6 metres high privacy screen is to be erected along the south-eastern elevation of the deck at the ground floor level. (Condition No. 8).

 

iii.      The proposed spa has a side setback of 2.69m from the north-western side boundary and is well set back from the dwellings on neighbouring properties. It is unlikely to generate any unreasonable overlooking into any windows of main living area or private open space as the proposed spa is set well away from the adjoining property.

 

iv.      The appropriate standard for swimming pool/ spa will be required to ensure the spa’s filter is appropriately designed and located to minimise noise impacts (Conditions 34 and 36)

 

 

Part 4.6 - Ancillary facilities:

 

 

Spa coping

 

Due to the slope of the land, the proposed spa at the south-western elevation of the deck will be situated 1.127 metres above the natural ground level. The proposed spa complies with the 2 metres setback requirement of the DCP and is unlikely to generate significant impacts subject to conditions. To ensure visual amenity between the neighbours is maintained, screen planting that will attain a height of 2m-2.5m should be planted at the north-western boundary, along the proposed spa. The planting location and species should comply with the bushfire requirement. This is conditioned (Condition No. 7).

 

Consent conditions have been included as part of the recommendation to ensure the proposed spa complies with Council’s Swimming Pool Code and Swimming Pool Act 1992 (Conditions 34 and 36).

 

 

Development Control Plan 40 - Construction and Demolition Waste Management

 

The applicant has submitted a waste management plan would comply with DCP 40, subject to conditions.

 

Development Control Plan No. 43 - Car Parking

 

The proposed car parking arrangement is compliant with DCP 43.

 

Development Control Plan 47 - Water Management

 

The proposal has been considered in accordance with DCP 47.

 

Likely Impacts

 

The proposed development has been assessed against the relevant considerations and is considered unlikely to generate any unreasonable impacts on the neighbouring properties or the surrounding area.

 

Suitability of the Site

 

The site is considered to be suitable for the proposed development.

 

Public Interest

 

The approval of the application is considered to be in the public interest.

 

Conclusion

 

Having regard to the provisions of section 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, the proposed development is considered to be satisfactory. Therefore, it is recommended that the application be approved.

 

Recommendation:

 

PURSUANT TO SECTION 80(1) OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT ACT, 1979

 

THAT the Council, as the consent authority, is of the opinion that the objection under State Environmental Planning Policy No. 1 - Development Standards to Clause 46 height of the building of the Ku-ring-gai Planning Scheme Ordinance is well founded. The Council is also of the opinion that strict compliance with the development standard is unreasonable and unnecessary in the circumstances of this case as discussed in this report.

 

AND

 

THAT the Council, as the consent authority, being satisfied that the objection under SEPP No. 1 is well founded and also being of the opinion that the granting of consent to DA0344/13 is consistent with the aims of the Policy, grant development consent to DA0344/13 for extension to rear balcony; and new deck and spa at ground floor level on land at 35 Ivey Street Lindfield, for a period of two [2) years from the date of the Notice of Determination, subject to the following conditions:

 

Conditions that identify approved plans:

 

1.     Approved architectural plans and documentation (new development)

 

The development must be carried out in accordance with work shown in colour on the following plans and documentation listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, except where amended by other conditions of this consent.

 

Plan no.

Drawn by

Dated

P1005-02-DA

Artec Projects

15.02.2013

P1005-03-DA

Artec Projects

15.02.2013

P1005-04-DA

Artec Projects

15.02.2013

P1005-05-DA

Artec Projects

15.02.2013

P1005-06-DA

Artec Projects

15.02.2013

P1005-07-DA

Artec Projects

15.02.2013

P1005-08-DA

Artec Projects

15.02.2013

 

Document(s)

Dated

Bush fire risk assessment and certification, (prepared by Building Code & Bushfire Hazard Solutions)

10 April 2013

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

2.     Inconsistency between documents

 

In the event of any inconsistency between conditions of this consent and the drawings/documents referred to above, the conditions of this consent prevail.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to demolition, excavation or construction:

 

3.     Asbestos works

 

All work involving asbestos products and materials, including asbestos-cement-sheeting (ie. Fibro), must be carried out in accordance with the guidelines for asbestos work published by WorkCover Authority of NSW.

 

Reason:         To ensure public safety.

 

4.     Notice of commencement

 

At least 48 hours prior to the commencement of any development (including demolition, excavation, shoring or underpinning works), a notice of commencement of building or subdivision work form and appointment of the principal certifying authority form shall be submitted to Council.

 

Reason:       Statutory requirement.

 

5.     Notification of builder’s details

 

Prior to the commencement of any development or excavation works, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be notified in writing of the name and contractor licence number of the owner/builder intending to carry out the approved works.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of the construction certificate:

 

6.     Rural Fire Services Condition

 

Asset Protection Zones

 

The intent of measures is to provide sufficient space and maintain reduced fuel loads so as to ensure radiant heat levels of buildings are below critical limits and to prevent direct flame contact with a building. To achieve this, the following conditions shall apply:

 

1.       At the commencement of building works and in perpetuity the entire property shall be managed as an inner protection area (IPA) as outlined within section4.1.3 and Appendix 5 of 'Planning for Bush Fire Protection 2006' and the NSW Rural Fire Service's document 'Standards for asset protection zones'.

 

Water and utilities

 

The intent of measures is to provide adequate services of water for the protection of buildings during and after the passage of a bush fire, and to locate gas and electricity so as not to contribute to the risk of fire to a building. To achieve this, the following conditions shall apply:

 

2.       Water, electricity and gas are to comply with section 4.1.3 of 'Planning for Bush Fire Protection 2006'.

 

Access

 

The intent of measures for internal roads is to provide safe operational access for emergency services personnel in suppressing a bush fire, while residents are accessing or egressing an area. To achieve this, the following conditions shall apply:

 

3.       To aid in fire fighting activities, unobstructed pedestrian access to the rear of the property shall be provided and is to be maintained at all times.

 

Design and construction

 

The intent of measures is that buildings are designed and constructed to withstand the potential impacts of bush fire attack. To achieve this, the following conditions shall apply:

 

4.       New construction on the western elevation shall comply with Sections 3 and 9 (BAL FZ) Australian Standard AS3959 2009 'Construction of buildings in bushfire prone areas'. However, any material, element of construction or system when tested to the method described in Australian Standard AS1530.8.2. Methods for fire tests on building materials, components and structures Part 8.2: Tests on elements of construction for buildings exposed to simulated bushfire attack Large flaming sources shall comply with Clause 13.8 of that Standard except that flaming of the specimen is not permitted and there shall be no exposed timber.

 

5.       Windows assemblies shall comply with modified Sections 3 and 9 of AS3959 (as above) or the following: i. They shall be completely protected by a non-combustible and non-perforated bushfire shutter that complies with Section 3.7 of AS3959 excluding parts (e) & (f); and ii. They shall comply with the following: a) Window frames and hardware shall be metal; b) Glazing shall be toughened glass, minimum 6mm; c) Seals to stiles, head and sills or thresholds shall be manufactured from materials having a flammability index no greater than 5; d) The openable portion of the window shall be screened internally or externally with a mesh with a maximum aperture of 2mm, made from corrosion resistant steel or bronze. The frame supporting the mesh shall be metal.

 

6.       External Doors (not including garage doors) shall comply with modified Sections 3 and 9 of AS3959 (as above) or the following: i. They shall be completely protected by a non-combustible and non-perforated bushfire shutter that complies with Section 3.7 of AS3959 excluding parts (e) & (f); and ii. They shall comply with the following: a) Doors shall be non-combustible; b) Externally fitted hardware that supports the panel in its function of opening and closing shall be metal; c) Where doors incorporate glazing, the glazing shall be toughened glass minimum 6mm; d) Seals to stiles, head and sills or thresholds shall be manufactured from silicone; e) Door frames shall be metal; f) Doors shall be tight fitting to the door frame or an abutting door; g) Weather strips, draught excluders or draught seals shall be installed if applicable.

 

General advice

 

The Service recognises that the site is constrained and that the proposed development falls within the Flame Zone. Flame Zone development is high risk development; consequently, in situations such as this, the Service seeks to improve the overall fire safety of the existing development. This requires greater emphasis on construction standards, landscaping, siting, and vegetation management practices to ensure improved levels of protection are afforded to the development, its occupants and fire fighters. The Service has undertaken a merit based assessment of the proposal and provides the above advice in accordance with 'Planning for Bush Fire Protection 2006'.

 

Reason:         Bushfire safety.

 

7.     Screen planting

 

To ensure the visual amenity to the streetscape and to adjoining properties is protected, screen planting is to be provided at the north-western boundary, along the proposed spa, as marked in red on the approved plans. The plant species is to attain a height of 2.5m. The plant species selected are to be appropriate for the location and in compliance with Rural Fire Services requirements. 

 

Reason:       To maintain amenity and privacy to No. 33 Ivey Street, Lindfield.

 

8.     Privacy screen

 

A privacy screen, designed to prevent overlooking to the adjoining property at No. 37 Ivey Street Lindfield and with height of 1.6 metres above finished floor level, shall be erected along the south- eastern side of the balcony at the ground floor and first floor levels, as marked in red on the approved plans. Details of the privacy screen shall be submitted to Principal Certifying Authority for approval prior to issue of the Construction Certificate.

 

Reason:        To ensure visual privacy is protected.

 

9.     Long service levy

 

In accordance with Section 109F(i) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act a Construction Certificate shall not be issued until any long service levy payable under Section 34 of the Building and Construction Industry Long Service Payments Act 1986 (or where such levy is payable by instalments, the first instalment of the levy) has been paid. Council is authorised to accept payment. Where payment has been made elsewhere, proof of payment is to be provided to Council.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

10.   Builder’s indemnity insurance

 

The applicant, builder, developer or person who does the work on this development, must arrange builder’s indemnity insurance and submit the certificate of insurance in accordance with the requirements of Part 6 of the Home Building Act 1989 to the Certifying Authority for endorsement of the plans accompanying the Construction Certificate.

 

It is the responsibility of the applicant, builder or developer to arrange the builder's indemnity insurance for residential building work over the value of $20,000. The builder's indemnity insurance does not apply to commercial or industrial building work or to residential work valued at less than $20,000, nor to work undertaken by persons holding an owner/builder's permit issued by the Department of Fair Trading (unless the owner/builder's property is sold within 7 years of the commencement of the work).

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of the construction certificate or prior to demolition, excavation or construction (whichever comes first):

 

11.   Infrastructure restorations fee

 

To ensure that damage to Council Property as a result of construction activity is rectified in a timely matter:

 

a)      All work or activity taken in furtherance of the development the subject of this approval must be undertaken in a manner to avoid damage to Council Property and must not jeopardise the safety of any person using or occupying the adjacent public areas.

 

b)      The applicant, builder, developer or any person acting in reliance on this approval shall be responsible for making good any damage to Council Property, and for the removal from Council Property of any waste bin, building materials, sediment, silt, or any other material or article.

 

c)      The Infrastructure Restoration Fee must be paid to the Council by the applicant prior to both the issue of the Construction Certificate and the commencement of any earthworks or construction.

 

d)      In consideration of payment of the Infrastructure Restorations Fee, Council will undertake such inspections of Council Property as Council considers necessary and also undertake, on behalf of the applicant, such restoration work to Council Property, if any, that Council considers necessary as a consequence of the development. The provision of such restoration work by the Council does not absolve any person of the responsibilities contained in (a) to (b) above. Restoration work to be undertaken by the Council referred to in this condition is limited to work that can be undertaken by Council at a cost of not more than the Infrastructure Restorations Fee payable pursuant to this condition.

 

e)      In this condition:

 

“Council Property” includes any road, footway, footpath paving, kerbing, guttering, crossings, street furniture, seats, letter bins, trees, shrubs, lawns, mounds, bushland, and similar structures or features on any road or public road within the meaning of the Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) or any public place; and

 

“Infrastructure Restoration Fee” means the Infrastructure Restorations Fee calculated in accordance with the Schedule of Fees & Charges adopted by Council as at the date of payment and the cost of any inspections required by the Council of Council Property associated with this condition.

 

Reason:       To maintain public infrastructure.

 

12.   Bush fire risk certification

 

Bush fire protection measures shall be carried out in accordance with the following bush fire risk assessment, report and certificate, listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, except where amended by other conditions of this consent:

 

Document title

Prepared by

Dated

Bush fire risk assessment and certification

Building Code & Bushfire Hazard Solutions

10 April 2013

 

Prior to the issue of the construction certificate, the principal certifying authority must be satisfied that the construction certificate is in accordance with the recommendations of the report and certificate as listed above.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

Conditions to be satisfied during the demolition, excavation and construction phases:

 

13.   Road opening permit

 

The opening of any footway, roadway, road shoulder or any part of the road reserve shall not be carried out without a road opening permit being obtained from Council (upon payment of the required fee) beforehand.

 

Reason:       Statutory requirement (Roads Act 1993 Section 138) and to maintain the integrity of Council’s infrastructure.

 

14.   Prescribed conditions

 

The applicant shall comply with any relevant prescribed conditions of development consent under clause 98 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation. For the purposes of section 80A (11) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, the following conditions are prescribed in relation to a development consent for development that involves any building work:

 

·        The work must be carried out in accordance with the requirements of the Building Code of Australia

·        In the case of residential building work for which the Home Building Act 1989 requires there to be a contract of insurance in force in accordance with Part 6 of that Act, that such a contract of insurance is in force before any works commence.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

15.   Hours of work

 

Demolition, excavation, construction work and deliveries of building material and equipment must not take place outside the hours of 7.00am to 5.00pm Monday to Friday and 8.00am to 12 noon Saturday. No work and no deliveries are to take place on Sundays and public holidays.

 

Excavation or removal of any materials using machinery of any kind, including compressors and jack hammers, must be limited to between 7.30am and 5.00pm Monday to Friday, with a respite break of 45 minutes between 12 noon 1.00pm.

 

Where it is necessary for works to occur outside of these hours (ie) placement of concrete for large floor areas on large residential/commercial developments or where building processes require the use of oversized trucks and/or cranes that are restricted by the RTA from travelling during daylight hours to deliver, erect or remove machinery, tower cranes, pre-cast panels, beams, tanks or service equipment to or from the site, approval for such activities will be subject to the issue of an "outside of hours works permit" from Council as well as notification of the surrounding properties likely to be affected by the proposed works.

 

Note:              Failure to obtain a permit to work outside of the approved hours will result in on the spot fines being issued.

 

Reason:         To ensure reasonable standards of amenity for occupants of neighbouring properties.

 

 

16.   Approved plans to be on site

 

A copy of all approved and certified plans, specifications and documents incorporating conditions of consent and certification (including the Construction Certificate if required for the work) shall be kept on site at all times during the demolition, excavation and construction phases and must be readily available to any officer of Council or the Principal Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

 

17.   Engineering fees

 

For the purpose of any development related inspections by Ku-ring-gai Council engineers, the corresponding fees set out in Councils adopted Schedule of Fees and Charges are payable to Council. A re-inspection fee per visit may be charged where work is unprepared at the requested time of inspection, or where remedial work is unsatisfactory and a further inspection is required. Engineering fees must be paid in full prior to any final consent from Council.

 

Reason:         To protect public infrastructure.

 

18.   Statement of compliance with Australian Standards

 

The demolition work shall comply with the provisions of Australian Standard AS2601: 2001 The Demolition of Structures. The work plans required by AS2601: 2001 shall be accompanied by a written statement from a suitably qualified person that the proposal contained in the work plan comply with the safety requirements of the Standard. The work plan and the statement of compliance shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the commencement of any works.

 

Reason:         To ensure compliance with the Australian Standards.

 

19.   Construction noise

 

During excavation, demolition and construction phases, noise generated from the site shall be controlled in accordance with the recommendations of the approved noise and vibration management plan.

 

Reason:         To ensure reasonable standards of amenity to neighbouring properties.

 

20.   Site notice

 

A site notice shall be erected on the site prior to any work commencing and shall be displayed throughout the works period.

 

The site notice must:

 

·        be prominently displayed at the boundaries of the site for the purposes of informing the public that unauthorised entry to the site is not permitted

·        display project details including, but not limited to the details of the builder, Principal Certifying Authority and structural engineer

·        be durable and weatherproof

·        display the approved hours of work, the name of the site/project manager, the responsible managing company (if any), its address and 24 hour contact phone number for any inquiries, including construction/noise complaint are to be displayed on the site notice

·        be mounted at eye level on the perimeter hoardings/fencing and is to state that unauthorised entry to the site is not permitted

 

Reason:         To ensure public safety and public information.

 

21.   Dust control

 

During excavation, demolition and construction, adequate measures shall be taken to prevent dust from affecting the amenity of the neighbourhood. The following measures must be adopted:

 

·        physical barriers shall be erected at right angles to the prevailing wind direction or shall be placed around or over dust sources to prevent wind or activity from generating dust

·        earthworks and scheduling activities shall be managed to coincide with the next stage of development to minimise the amount of time the site is left cut or exposed

·        all materials shall be stored or stockpiled at the best locations

·        the ground surface should be dampened slightly to prevent dust from becoming airborne but should not be wet to the extent that run-off occurs

·        all vehicles carrying spoil or rubble to or from the site shall at all times be covered to prevent the escape of dust

·        all equipment wheels shall be washed before exiting the site using manual or automated sprayers and drive-through washing bays

·        gates shall be closed between vehicle movements and shall be fitted with shade cloth

·        cleaning of footpaths and roadways shall be carried out daily

 

Reason:         To protect the environment and amenity of surrounding properties.

 

22.   Use of road or footpath

 

During excavation, demolition and construction phases, no building materials, plant or the like are to be stored on the road or footpath without written approval being obtained from Council beforehand.  The pathway shall be kept in a clean, tidy and safe condition during building operations.  Council reserves the right, without notice, to rectify any such breach and to charge the cost against the applicant/owner/builder, as the case may be.

 

Reason:         To ensure safety and amenity of the area.

 

 

23.   Toilet facilities

 

During excavation, demolition and construction phases, toilet facilities are to be provided, on the work site, at the rate of one toilet for every 20 persons or part of 20 persons employed at the site.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

 

24.   Recycling of building material (general)

 

During demolition and construction, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that building materials suitable for recycling have been forwarded to an appropriate registered business dealing in recycling of materials. Materials to be recycled must be kept in good order.

 

Reason:         To facilitate recycling of materials.

 

 

25.   Construction signage

 

All construction signs must comply with the following requirements:

 

·       are not to cover any mechanical ventilation inlet or outlet vent

·       are not illuminated, self-illuminated or flashing at any time

·       are located wholly within a property where construction is being undertaken

·       refer only to the business(es) undertaking the construction and/or the site at which the construction is being undertaken

·       are restricted to one such sign per property

·       do not exceed 2.5m2

·       are removed within 14 days of the completion of all construction works

 

Reason:         To ensure compliance with Council's controls regarding signage.

 

26.   Road reserve safety

 

All public footways and roadways fronting and adjacent to the site must be maintained in a safe condition at all times during the course of the development works. Construction materials must not be stored in the road reserve. A safe pedestrian circulation route and a pavement/route free of trip hazards must be maintained at all times on or adjacent to any public access ways fronting the construction site.  Where public infrastructure is damaged, repair works must be carried out when and as directed by Council officers. Where pedestrian circulation is diverted on to the roadway or verge areas, clear directional signage and protective barricades must be installed in accordance with AS1742-3 (1996) “Traffic Control Devices for Work on Roads”. If pedestrian circulation is not satisfactorily maintained across the site frontage, and action is not taken promptly to rectify the defects, Council may undertake proceedings to stop work.

 

Reason:         To ensure safe public footways and roadways during construction.

 

27.   Services

 

Where required, the adjustment or inclusion of any new utility service facilities must be carried out by the applicant and in accordance with the requirements of the relevant utility authority. These works shall be at no cost to Council. It is the applicants’ full responsibility to make contact with the relevant utility authorities to ascertain the impacts of the proposal upon utility services (including water, phone, gas and the like). Council accepts no responsibility for any matter arising from its approval to this application involving any influence upon utility services provided by another authority.

 

Reason:         Provision of utility services.

 

28.   Erosion control

 

Temporary sediment and erosion control and measures are to be installed prior to the commencement of any works on the site. These measures must be maintained in working order during construction works up to completion. All sediment traps must be cleared on a regular basis and after each major storm and/or as directed by the Principal Certifying Authority and Council officers.

 

Reason:         To protect the environment from erosion and sedimentation.

 

29.   Drainage to existing system

 

Stormwater runoff from all new impervious areas and subsoil drainage systems shall be piped to the existing site drainage system. The installation of new drainage components must be completed by a licensed contractor in accordance with AS3500.3 (Plumbing Code) and the BCA. No stormwater runoff is to be placed into the Sydney Water sewer system. If an illegal sewer connection is found during construction, the drainage system must be rectified to the satisfaction of Council and Sydney Water.

 

Reason:         To protect the environment.

 

30.   No storage of materials beneath trees

 

No activities, storage or disposal of materials shall take place beneath the canopy of any tree protected under Council's Tree Preservation Order at any time.

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees.

 

31.   Removal of refuse

 

All builders' refuse, spoil and/or material unsuitable for use in landscape areas shall be removed from the site on completion of the building works.

 

Reason:         To protect the environment.

 

32.   On site retention of waste dockets

 

All demolition, excavation and construction waste dockets are to be retained on site, or at suitable location, in order to confirm which facility received materials generated from the site for recycling or disposal.

 

·       Each docket is to be an official receipt from a facility authorised to accept the material type, for disposal or processing.

·       This information is to be made available at the request of an Authorised Officer of Council.

 

Reason:       To protect the environment.

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate:

 

33.   Infrastructure repair

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority must be satisfied that any damaged public infrastructure caused as a result of construction works (including damage caused by, but not limited to, delivery vehicles, waste collection, contractors, sub-contractors, concrete vehicles) is fully repaired to the satisfaction of Council Development Engineer and at no cost to Council.

 

Reason:         To protect public infrastructure.

 

34.   Swimming pool (part 1)

 

Prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that:

 

C1

1.       Access to the pool/spa shall be restricted by a child resistant barrier in accordance with the regulations prescribed in the Swimming Pools Act, 1992:

 

(a)     The pool shall not be filled with water or be allowed to collect stormwater until the child resistant barrier is installed; and

(b)     The barrier is to conform to the requirements of AS 1926-1 2012 Fences and Gates for Private Swimming Pools.

 

Reason:         To ensure the safety of children.

 

2.       Any mechanical equipment associated with the swimming pool and/or spa pool shall be located in a sound-attenuating enclosure and positioned so that it is setback a minimum of 2m from the boundary of any adjoining premises. The Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the sound levels associated with the swimming pool/spa filtration system and associated mechanical equipment do not exceed 5dB(A) above the background noise level at the boundaries of the site.

 

Reason:       To protect the amenity of surrounding properties.

 

35.   Compliance with bush fire assessment, report and certificate

 

Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that all recommendations listed in the bush fire risk assessment and report below have been complied with:

 

Document title

Prepared by

Dated

Bush fire risk assessment and certification

Building Code & Bushfire Hazard Solutions

10 April 2013

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

Conditions to be satisfied at all times:

 

36.   Swimming pool (part 2)

 

At all times:

 

1.       Access to the swimming pool must be restricted by fencing or other measures as required by the Swimming Pools Act 1992.

2.       Noise levels associated with spa/pool pumping units shall not exceed 5dB(A) above the background noise level at the boundaries of the site.

3.       Devices or structures used for heating swimming pool water must not be placed where they are visible from a public place.

4.       For the purpose of health and amenity, the disposal of backwash and/or the emptying of a swimming pool into a reserve, watercourse, easement or storm water drainage system is prohibited. These waters are to discharge via a permanent drainage line into Sydney Water's sewer in accordance with Australian Standard AS3500.2 section 10.9. Permission is to be obtained from Sydney Water prior to the emptying of any pool to the sewer.

5.       Lighting from the swimming pool and other communal facilities shall not detrimentally impact the amenity of other premises and adjacent dwellings.

 

Reason:         Health and amenity.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bonnie Yue

Development Assessment Officer

 

 

 

 

Shaun Garland

Team Leader Development Assessment South

 

 

 

 

Corrie Swanepoel

Manager Development Assessment Services

 

 

 

 

Michael Miocic

Director Development & Regulation

 

 

Attachments:

A1View

Location sketch

 

2014/043659

 

A2View

Zoning extract

 

2014/043652

 

A3View

Survey plan

 

2013/241484

 

A4View

Circular PS 08-014

 

2010/129057

 

A5View

SEPP1 Objection

 

2014/049455

 

A6View

Letter from Rural Fire Services

 

2014/049542

 

A7View

Bushfire Assessment Statement

 

2013/241482

 

A8View

Architectural plans

 

2014/043741

  


APPENDIX No: 1 - Location sketch

 

Item No: GB.5

 


APPENDIX No: 2 - Zoning extract

 

Item No: GB.5

 


APPENDIX No: 3 - Survey plan

 

Item No: GB.5

 


APPENDIX No: 4 - Circular PS 08-014

 

Item No: GB.5

 


 


APPENDIX No: 5 - SEPP1 Objection

 

Item No: GB.5

 


 


APPENDIX No: 6 - Letter from Rural Fire Services

 

Item No: GB.5

 


 


 


APPENDIX No: 7 - Bushfire Assessment Statement

 

Item No: GB.5

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


APPENDIX No: 8 - Architectural plans

 

Item No: GB.5

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 29 April 2014

GB.6 / 277

 

 

Item GB.6

DA0318/13

 

18 March 2014

 

 

development application

 

 

Summary Sheet

 

Report title:

6A Ignatius Road Lindfield - Construction of a two storey dwelling house including attached secondary dwelling, swimming pool and spa

ITEM/AGENDA NO:

GB.6

 

 

Application No:

DA0318/13

Property Details:

6A Ignatius Road Lindfield

Lot & DP No:      Lot 4 DP 20641

Site area (m2):   1322m2

Zoning:               Residential 2(a)

Ward:

Roseville

Proposal/Purpose:

Construction of two storey dwelling-house with attached secondary dwelling, swimming pool and spa

Type of Consent:

Local

Applicant:

Mr Brian Woods

Owner:

Mr B Woods, Mrs M Woods, Mrs B Carlin

Date Lodged:

26 August 2013

Recommendation:

Approval

 

 

  

 


Purpose of Report

 

To determine Development Application No. DA0318/13 for construction of a two storey dwelling house with attached secondary dwelling, swimming pool and spa.

 

The application is to be determined by full Council in accordance with the requirements of the Department of Planning. Council’s attention is directed to the attached Planning Circular PS08-014 from the NSW Department of Planning which requires all development applications that involve a variation of greater than 10% under the provisions of SEPP No 1 to be determined by full Council. The proposed variation to the site width development standard exceeds 10%.

 

integrated planning and reporting

 

Places, Spaces & Infrastructure

 

Community Strategic Plan

Long Term Objective

Delivery Program

Term Achievement

Operational Plan

Task

P3.1 The built environment delivers attractive, interactive and sustainable living and working environments.

A high standard of design quality and building environmental performance is achieved in new development.

Assessment of applications is consistent with Council’s adopted LEPs and DCPs.

 

History

 

Site

 

PCDC0077/12 – demolition of the existing dwelling-house at Lots 3 & 4 DP 20641

 

This complying development application was approved by a private certifier on 23 February 2012.

 

PCDC0095/13 – two storey dwelling at 6 Ignatius Road (Lot 3 DP 20641)

 

This complying development application was approved by a private certifier on 25 March 2013.

 

DA history

 

26 August 2013                                                                      Application submitted.

 

30 August 2013                                                                      Application notified.

 

29 October 2013                                                                    Application re-notified.

 

20 October 2013                                                                    Letter sent to applicant requesting that the following issues be addressed: non-compliant floor space ratio, non-compliant side setbacks, inadequate contextual information, building height plane encroachments, inadequate overshadowing information, privacy impacts from first floor windows, inadequate boundary fence details, Bushfire report, location of side boundary fence on survey.

 

13 November 2013                                                                Draft amended plans submitted.

 

4 December 2013                                                                            Final amended plans submitted.

 

15 January 2014                                                                    Revised Bushfire Risk Assessment Report submitted.

 

30 January 2014                                                                    Further information on the acoustic measures for the proposed pool and spa requested.

 

31 January 2014                                                                    Further information on the acoustic measures for the proposed pool and spa submitted.

 

3 March 2014                                                                         Revised Bushfire Risk Assessment Report submitted.

 

14 March 2014                                                                       SEPP 1 Objection submitted.

 

The Site

 

Site description

 

The subject site is legally described as Lot 4 in DP 20641 and is known as 6A Ignatius Road, Lindfield. Originally, Lots 3 and 4 of DP 20641 contained a single wide fronted dwelling known as 6 Ignatius Road. This dwelling was demolished in 2012 and the two allotments sold to separate owners. A new two storey dwelling is currently under construction at 6 Ignatius Road.

 

The subject site is irregular in shape with a splayed frontage to Ignatius Road of 19.66 metres, a maximum depth of 81 metres and a total area of 1322m². The site is located on the higher, eastern side of Ignatius Road. The site falls from the rear boundary to Ignatius Road with a cross fall of approximately 10 metres. Vehicular access is currently provided by a temporary crossover. The site does not contain any structures. Significant vegetation is located near the front and rear boundaries of the site.

 

Surrounding development

 

The properties surrounding the site are zoned for residential purposes. These properties are occupied by a mixture of single and two storey dwellings. The West Lindfield Bowling Club and Princes Park are located opposite the site on the northern side of Ignatius Road.

 

The Proposal

 

The application involves the construction of a two storey dwelling house with attached secondary dwelling, swimming pool and spa. Details of the proposal include:

 

Ground floor level:

 

Verandah, media room, bedroom 1 with en-suite, laundry, lounge, kitchen, dining room, powder room, rumpus room, guest bedroom, shower room, TV room, bedroom 6, secondary dwelling (bedroom, en-suite, laundry, living room and kitchen).

 

First floor level:

 

Four bedrooms, ensuite, bathroom, WC.

 

Basement floor level:

 

Double garage and store.

 

External works:

 

Swimming pool, spa, driveway, landscaping.

 

Amended plans received on 3 December 2013

 

The amended plans proposed the following changes to the application:

 

·    reduction of first floor area, floor space to accommodate bedroom 2, WIW and en-suite, bedroom 3, 4 and bathroom

·    stairway redesigned and stairwell window to be obscure glazing

·    side boundary setback along the southern side boundary increased

·    provision of screen planting

·    walk in robe to Bedroom 6 deleted

·    re-orientation of guest bedroom and laundry and reconfiguration of stairwell so that it does not protrude externally

·    bathroom adjacent to guest bedroom converted to powder room

·    Bedroom 1 has been reduced in size

·    reduction in lounge and pantry

·    study deleted

·    front verandah has been reduced in size

·    details of adjacent development shown on the plans

 

Consultation

 

Community

 

In accordance with Development Control Plan No. 56, owners of surrounding properties were given notice of the application. Two submissions were received from the following:

 

1.       Mr R Stephens, 35 Polding Street, Lindfield

 

The submissions raised the following issues:

 

privacy to 35 Polding Road

 

The backyard of 35 Polding Road separates the rear (northern) elevation of 35 Polding Road from the side (southern) elevation of the proposed dwelling. The distance between the side elevation of the proposed dwelling and the rear elevation of 35 Polding Road is 10.8-18.5 metres.

 

At the first floor level there is one window to a stairwell which will be of obscure glazing. The windows largely associated with the high use internal areas of the dwelling are located at the ground floor of the building. The rumpus room at the ground floor level along the southern elevation has a highlight window and will not impact unreasonably on the amenity of neighbouring properties.

 

The development is designed in a manner that maintains sufficient visual and acoustic privacy to neighbouring properties.

 

overshadowing

 

Information extrapolated from the submitted shadow diagrams on the levels of solar access available show that the majority of the private open space, swimming pool and northern wall of the dwelling at 35 Polding Road will receive solar access between 9am and 12pm. By 1pm half the pool will be overshadowed but the main private open space and northern wall of the dwelling will be in full sun. The dwelling, main private open space and the pool will receive at least 4 hours of solar access.

 

The shadow diagrams demonstrate that 4 hours of solar access is provided to adjoining properties, acheiving compliance with the solar access provisions of DCP No. 38.

 

noise from spa

 

The spa is located on the northern side of the proposed dwelling. The distance between the spa and the boundary shared with 35 Polding Road is 14.7 metres. The proposed dwelling is situated between the spa and shared boundary. The dwelling will act as a noise barrier for the spa. Furthermore, a standard condition (Condition 54) restricting noise emissions from the spa is included in the recommendation.  It is unlikely that noise from the spa would have a significant acoustic impact on the dwelling at 35 Polding Road.

 

bulk and scale of the proposed building

 

That part of the proposed dwelling adjacent to the rear boundary of 35 Polding Road has a 2.27 metres setback at the ground floor level and 5.29 metres setback at the first floor level. The setbacks exceed the requirements of the DCP, there are no unrelieved walls more than 8 metres in length and the majority of this part of the elevation is single storey. The bulk and scale of the building is acceptable.

 

location of the southern boundary is not consistent with the location of the boundary fence

 

The survey plan shows that the dividing fence between the subject site and 33 and 35 Polding Road is not located on the boundary. It is not unusual for the location of a dividing fence to differ from the location of the boundary. The dimensions on the architectural plans are correctly measured from the site boundaries.

 

further submission dated 12 November 2013

 

A further submission was received from the owners of No. 35 Polding Road, Lindfield in support of the application, subject to amendments agreed between themselves and the applicant. The amendments include:

 

·    increased side setback for the southern elevation;

·    additional screen planting;

·    reduction of first floor level, reduction of first floor windows with obscure glazing to stairwell window;

·    simplified roof design; and

·    overshadowing of swimming pool to comply with the requirements of DCP 38.

 

Amended plans received by Council on 3 December 2013

 

Amended plans incorporating the amendments agreed between the applicant and the owners of No. 35 Polding Road were submitted. The amended plans were notified and no submissions were received.

 

Within Council

 

Landscaping

 

Council's Landscape and Tree Assessment Officer commented on the proposal as follows:

 

Site characteristics

 

The site is characterised by an open landscaped setting, with scattered trees located adjacent to perimeter boundaries. Endemic tree species consistent with the endangered Sydney Turpentine Ironbark Forest (STIF) plant community are located on site.

 

Tree impacts

 

The development proposes the removal of three trees, two of which conflict with the development proposal. The following comments are made:

 

T5 Chamaecyparis obtusa (Japanese cypress) located centrally adjacent to the southern site boundary. The tree is in poor health and condition and does not have broader landscape significance. Removal is supported.

 

T6 Tristaniopsis laurina (Water Gum) located adjacent to the southern site boundary. The tree is in fair health and condition, and although providing site and neighbour amenity, does not have broader landscape significance. Removal is supported.

 

T3 Cryptomeria japonica (Japanese Cedar) located adjacent to the south-western site corner. The tree is prominent within the streetscape/landscape setting and outwardly in good health and condition although on a phototrophic lean. The tree is not adversely impacted by the development works and no justification has been provided for its removal. It is required for this tree to be retained. This is conditioned.

 

T4 Angophora costata (Sydney Red Gum) located within the site frontage. The tree is an endemic species and is prominent within the landscape setting. The tree is outwardly in good health and condition. The proposed development encroaches within the tree protection zone (TPZ) to the east and south, but at a sufficient setback to enable the retention and viability of the tree.

 

T7 Erythrina spp located adjacent to the southern site boundary within the neighbouring property. The tree is an exempt species within Council’s Tree Preservation Order (TPO) and has a high tolerance to development impact. The proposed development encroaches approximately 20% of the TPZ but this is an acceptable level.

 

All other trees are being retained. Tree protection requirements have been conditioned.

 

Landscape plan/tree replenishment

 

The submitted landscape plan is satisfactory, although plantings are sparse due to the fire report recommendations for the site to be maintained as an inner protection area (IPA). Screen planting between the proposal and neighbouring properties is limited.

 

Stormwater plan

 

No landscape based concerns.

 

BASIX

 

No landscape commitment has been made within the submitted BASIX certificate #488394S_04 dated 13/08/2013.

 

Fire

 

The site is identified as bush fire prone land. The applicant’s fire consultant has recommended the site be maintained as an APZ/IPA and new landscape works comply with Appendix 5 ‘Landscaping and Property Management’ of Planning for Bush Fire Protection 2006.

 

The Landscape Plan has been certified by the fire consultant.

 

Conclusion

 

The application is acceptable on landscape grounds.

 

Engineering

 

Council's Development Engineer commented on the proposal as follows:

 

Stormwater disposal

 

The development is classified as a Type 3 in Location A.

 

The stormwater runoff from the proposed roof area is collected and conveyed to seven underground tanks (5 x 2000L on the eastern side and 2 x 3200L on the northern side) and three aboveground tanks (3 x 2200L on the southern side). The overflow from all rainwater tanks and grated drain is directed by gravity to Ignatius Road.

 

The BASIX commitments of 23000L rainwater storage has been satisfied by provision of ten rainwater re-use tanks (total storage volume is 23000L) for laundry and irrigation.

 

Site access

 

Access to the property is via a new vehicular crossing. Council will provide a quotation for the construction of a pipe crossing upon application prior to Construction Certificate issue.

 

The driveway gradients and garage dimensions comply with Australian Standard 2890.1 (2004) "Off-Street Car Parking".

   

Recommendation

 

From an engineering perspective, there are no objections to this application.

 

Outside Council

 

Rural Fire Service

 

In accordance with the provisions of section Part 1(b) of Section 79BA of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, Council has been provided with a certificate by a person who is recognised by the NSW Rural Fire Service as a qualified consultant in bush fire risk assessment stating that the development conforms to the relevant specifications and requirements. As such, the application does not require a referral to the Rural Fire Service.

 

Council has considered the measures to be taken with respect to the protection of persons, property and the environment from danger that may arise from a bush fire. Appropriate conditions that adopt the recommendations of the bush fire risk assessment report and certificate have been recommended (Conditions 24, 55 and 57).

 

Statutory Provisions

 

Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979

 

The proposal is ‘Local development’ under Part 4 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979 and requires development consent pursuant to the Ku-ring-gai Planning Scheme Ordinance.

 

State Environmental Planning Policy No.1 – Development Standards

 

The provisions of SEPP 1 seek to provide flexibility in the application of planning controls operating as development standards where strict compliance with those standards would, in any particular case be unreasonable or unnecessary or tend to hinder the attainment of the objects specified in section 5(a)(i) and (ii) of the Act. The proposed development seeks a variation to Council’s 18 metres allotment width requirement, which is a development standard. The applicant has lodged a SEPP 1 Objection in support of the variation, the assessment of which is contained below under the KPSO assessment.

 

State Environmental Planning Policy No. 19 – Bushland in Urban Areas

 

The site is opposite 76A Highfield Road Lindfield which is land that contains bushland and is zoned for public open space purposes. The development does not require the removal of any bushland in 76A Highfield Road. Standard conditions requiring the installation and maintenance of sediment control devices have been included in the recommendation. These conditions will minimise the likelihood of erosion and siltation during the construction process. The development is unlikely to result in the spread of weeds and exotic plants. The development is consistent with the requirements outlined in clause 9 of the SEPP.

 

State Environmental Planning Policy No. 55 – Remediation of Land

 

The provisions of SEPP 55 require Council to consider the potential for a site to be contaminated. The subject site has a history of residential use and as such, it is unlikely to contain any contamination and further investigation is not warranted in this case.

 

State Environmental Planning Policy (Building Sustainability Index: BASIX) 2004

 

A valid BASIX certificate has been submitted. The certificate demonstrates compliance with the provisions of the SEPP and adequately reflects all amendments to the application.

 

Sydney Regional Environmental Planning Policy (Sydney Harbour Catchment) 2005

 

SREP 2005 applies to the site as it is located in the Sydney Harbour Catchment. The Planning Principles in Part 2 of the SREP must be considered in the preparation of environmental planning instruments, development control plans, environmental studies and master plans. The proposal is not affected by the provisions of the SREP which relate to the assessment of development applications as the site is not located in the Foreshores and Waterways Area as defined by the Foreshores and Waterways Area Map.

 

State Environmental Planning Policy (Affordable Rental Housing) 2009

 

Division 2 ‘Secondary dwellings’ of the SEPP applies to land which is zoned R1, R2, R3, R4 and R5 or land that is equivalent to those zones but only if a dwelling house is permissible on the land. Clause 5 (2A) of the SEPP states that in relation to land to which a non-standard environmental planning instrument applies a reference in the SEPP to a land use zone in the last draft environmental planning instrument that was the subject of community consultation. The zoning for the site under draft Ku-ring-gai LEP 2013 is R2 Low Density Residential, accordingly the SEPP applies to the site and development for the purposes of a secondary dwelling is permissible.

 

The SEPP (Affordable Rental Housing) 2009 permits development for the purposes of a secondary dwelling on residential land. A secondary dwelling is defined as:

 

a self-contained dwelling that:

 

(a)  is established in conjunction with another dwelling (the principal dwelling) and

(b)  is on the same lot of land (not being an individual lot in a strata plan or community title scheme) as the principal dwelling, and

(c)  is located within, or is attached to, or is separate from, the principal dwelling.

 

Development may be carried out with consent (clause 22)

 

Clause 22(3) states that a consent authority must not consent to development to which this division applies unless:

 

(a)  the total floor area of the principal dwelling and the secondary dwelling is no more than the maximum floor area allowed for a dwelling house on the land under another environmental planning instrument, and

(b)  the total floor area of the secondary dwelling is no more than 60m2 or, if a greater floor area is permitted in respect of a secondary dwelling on the land under another environmental planning instrument, that greater floor area

 

Clause 22(4) states that a consent authority must not refuse consent to development to which this division applies on either of the following grounds:

 

(a)  site area, if:

 

(i)      the secondary dwelling is located within, or is attached to, the principal dwelling

(ii)     the site area is at least 450m2

 

(b)  parking

 

if no additional parking is to be provided on the site.

 

SEPP (Affordable Rental Housing) 2009 – Development Standards

 

Development standard

Proposed

Complies

Total Floor Area:

60m2 (max)

 

52m2

 

YES

For detached secondary dwelling -

§ the site area is at least 450 square metres.

 

 

The subject site has an area of 1322m2.

 

 

YES

Parking:

No additional parking is required to be provided on the site.

 

No additional hardstand parking space is proposed to be provided on site.

 

YES

 

Comment: The Ku-ring-gai Planning Scheme Ordinance does not specify a maximum FSR for a dwelling, therefore clause 22 (3) (a) does not apply. The proposed secondary dwelling has an area of 52m2 and complies with clause 22 (3) (b) of the SEPP.

 

The subject site has an area of 1322m2 and the secondary dwelling is located within the principal dwelling, the proposal complies with clause 22 (4).

 

Ku-ring-gai Planning Scheme Ordinance

 

Development standards

 

Development standard

Proposed

Complies

Site area:  1322m2

Minimum size allotments

 

 

Site area:  836m2 (min)

1322m2

YES

Site width:  18m (min) at 12.2m from the street alignment

16m (existing non compliance)

NO

Building height  8m (max)

6.64m

YES

Built upon areas 60%(793.2m2)(max)

 

48.8% (645.35m2)

 

YES

 

 

Allotment width

 

The width of the site at a distance of 12.2 metres from the street frontage is 16 metres. This does not satisfy the 18 metres width requirement specified by the KPSO. An allotment width of 16 metres represents an 11% variation to the development standard for allotment width. Clause 43(5) of the KPSO states that nothing in clause 43 operates to prohibit the erection of a dwelling house on land which was in existence as a separate parcel on the appointed day.  Deposited plan No. 20641 was registered on 28 January 1947 and the appointed day is 29 September 1971. Whether the site was a separate parcel of land on the appointed day is a question of fact. Finding an answer to this question is difficult as the site was previously used in conjunction with the adjacent allotment (Lot 3 of DP 20641) for the purpose of a single dwelling house. This dwelling house was demolished in 2012 so that each lot could be sold and developed separately.

 

Therefore it is necessary to determine whether the allotment was in existence as a separate parcel on the appointed day the date of construction of the dwelling that previously occupied Lots 3 and 4 of DP 20641. If the dwelling was constructed after the appointed day a SEPP 1 objection to the allotment width control is not required because the allotment was a separate parcel on the appointed day, however if the dwelling was constructed before the appointed day the site was not a separate parcel of land on the appointed day, but a single parcel of land comprised of two allotments. Historic aerial photography suggests that the dwelling may have been constructed before the appointed day, for precautionary reasons a SEPP 1 objection has been provided (Attachment 4).

 

The main arguments advanced by the applicant in the SEPP 1 objection are:

 

(i)      The proposal satisfies the objectives for residential development as outlined in Schedule 9 of the KPSO

(ii)     The non compliance with the standard would not hinder the achievement of the object in Section 5(a)(i) and (ii) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act

(iii)    The size and shape of the existing lot is sufficient to allow the construction of a dwelling in compliance with Council’s development controls

 

 

SEPP 1 CONSIDERATION

 

whether the control is a development standard

 

The allotment width control in clause 58B of the KPSO is a development standard as defined under section 4 of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act, 1979.

 

the underlying objectives or purpose behind the standard

 

There are no specifically stated purposes or objectives expressed in the Ku-ring-gai Planning Scheme Ordinance for the allotment width control. The general aims for the Residential 2(a) zone are:

 

(a) to maintain and, where appropriate, improve the existing amenity and environmental character of residential areas;

(b) to permit new residential development only where it is compatible with the existing environmental character of the locality and has a sympathetic and harmonious relationship with adjoining development.

 

An allotment width control works in conjunction with the allotment area control to create consistency in allotment size and shape within the zone. The size and shape of allotments has an impact on the characteristics of an area as it influences the way in which houses and gardens are designed. Wide allotments enable the provision of side setbacks that can support screen planting and provide separation between buildings which influences privacy, amenity and the character of an area.

 

whether compliance with the development standard is consistent with the aims of the policy and, in particular, whether compliance with the development standard hinders the attainment of the objectives specified under Section 5(A)(i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979

 

The SEPP 1 objection states that strict compliance would hinder the attainment of the objects of the Act as the objectives of the development standard are achieved notwithstanding the non compliance with the development standard.

 

The aim of SEPP 1 is to:

 

Provide flexibility in the application of planning controls operating by virtue of development standards in circumstances where strict compliance with those standards would, in any particular case, be unreasonable or unnecessary or tend to hinder the attainment of the objects specified in Section 5(a) (i) and (ii) of the Act.

 

In this regard, the objectives of Section 5(a)(i) and (ii) of the Act are:

 

(a) To encourage:

 

1. the proper management, development and conservation of natural and artificial resources, including agricultural land, natural areas, forests, minerals, water, cities, towns and villages for the purpose of promoting the social and economic welfare of the community and a better environment;

 

2. the promotion and co-ordination of the orderly and economic use and development of land.

 

For the reasons outlined below, it is agreed that strict compliance with the development standard would hinder the attainment of the objectives of the Act in this instance as the proposal is consistent with the objectives of the Act despite the non compliance.

 

whether compliance with the development standard is unreasonable or unnecessary in the circumstances of the case

 

Despite the width of the site not being compliant, the area of the allotment at 1,322m2 is 486m2 or 58% larger than the 836m2 minimum allotment size for the zone. The area of the allotment provides flexibility in the design of the dwelling. This flexibility allows for a design which respects the local context and has minimal impacts on neighbouring properties. The front setback of the dwelling represents the average of the adjacent dwellings to the north and south and the built upon area of the dwelling is less than 60%. A high proportion of the site area is landscaped and screen planting adjacent to the side boundaries has been provided.

 

whether the objection is well founded

 

In Wehbe v Pittwater Chief Justice Preston expressed the view that there are five different ways in which an objection may be well founded:

1.   the objectives of the standard are achieved notwithstanding non-compliance with the standard;

2.   the underlying objective or purpose of the standard is not relevant to the development and therefore compliance is unnecessary;

3.   the underlying object of purpose would be defeated or thwarted if compliance was required and therefore compliance is unreasonable;

4.   the development standard has been virtually abandoned or destroyed by the Council's own actions in granting consents departing from the standard and hence compliance with the standard is unnecessary and unreasonable;

5.   the zoning of the particular land is unreasonable or inappropriate so that a development standard appropriate for that zoning is also unreasonable and unnecessary as it applies to the land and compliance with the standard would be unreasonable or unnecessary.  That is, the particular parcel of land should not have been included in the particular zone.

 

Criterion 1 is satisfied as the objectives of the standard are achieved despite the non compliance with the standard. The proposed development of the site for the purposes of a dwelling-house and secondary dwelling is consistent with the objectives for development as outlined in schedule 9 of the KPSO.

 

 

whether non-compliance with the development standard raises any matter of significance for State or regional environmental planning, and

 

      There are no matters of significance for State or regional environmental planning.

 

whether there is public benefit of maintaining the planning controls adopted by the environmental planning instrument.

 

The SEPP 1 register shows that the allotment width standard in the KPSO has been varied on previous occasions. In this instance, the applicant has demonstrated that compliance with the development standard would be unnecessary as the objectives of the control are achieved despite the non compliance. The unique circumstances of the case will not create an undesirable precedent for the variation of the development standard in other development applications.

 

 

Aims and objectives for residential zones:

 

The development: (i) provides satisfactory levels of solar access and privacy to surrounding properties; (ii) is of a bulk, scale and design, characteristic of the area; (iii) maintains adequate levels of soft landscaping; (iv) provides suitable egress/ingress for vehicles; and (v) maintains the landscape quality of the municipality. Consequently, the aims and objectives for residential development as outlined by Schedule 9 have been satisfied.

 

 

Heritage / conservation areas:

 

The site is not within a heritage conservation area, a draft heritage conservation area nor is it a listed heritage item or within the vicinity of a heritage listed item.

 

Aesthetic appearance:

 

The site is opposite 76A Highfield Road which is land zoned 6(a) Recreation Existing. The front elevation of the proposed dwelling will be visible from the 6(a) Recreation Existing zoned land. The front elevation incorporates a garage, stairs, veranda, portico, front door and windows. The building has a tile covered hipped roof and a front setback where a landscaped garden is proposed. The design of the dwelling is compatible with the design of existing dwellings in the area. The aesthetic appearance of the dwelling is acceptable.

 

Biodiversity land:

 

The site is identified as biodiversity significant land by the KPSO.  Prior to granting development consent for development on land identified as having biodiversity significance the following issues must be considered by the consent authority:

 

(a) the impact of the proposed development on the following:

(i) any native vegetation community,

(ii) the habitat of any threatened species, population or ecological community,

(iii) any regionally significant species of plant, animal or habitat,

(iv) any biodiversity corridor,

(v) any wetland,

(vi) the biodiversity values within any reserve,

(vii) the stability of the land, and

(b) any proposed measure to be undertaken to ameliorate any potential adverse environmental impact, and

(c) any opportunity to restore or enhance remnant vegetation, habitat and biodiversity corridors.

 

Development consent must not be granted for development on land identified as land of biodiversity significance unless the consent authority is satisfied that the development:

 

(a) is consistent with the objectives of this clause, and

(b) is designed, and will be sited and managed, to avoid any potential adverse environmental impact or, if a potential adverse environmental impact cannot be avoided:

(i) the development minimises disturbance and adverse impacts on remnant vegetation communities, habitat and threatened species and populations, and

(ii) measures have been considered to maintain native vegetation and habitat in parcels of a size, condition and configuration that will facilitate biodiversity protection and native flora and fauna movement through biodiversity corridors, and

(iii) the development avoids clearing steep slopes and facilitates the stability of the land, and

(iv) measures have been considered to achieve no net loss of significant vegetation or habitat.

 

The development responds to these requirements by retaining the significant native trees on the site and providing new trees and landscaping. The new planting includes a Sydney Red Gum within the patch of Sydney Turpentine Ironbark Forest at the rear of the site, new landscaping adjacent to the northern boundary and in front of the dwelling. The development is consistent with the requirements for biodiversity significant land.

 

Draft Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan 2013

 

The draft LEP and supporting material was exhibited from Monday 25 March 2013 to Monday 6 May 2013. The particular aims of the draft LEP are to guide the future development of land and the management of environmental, social, economic, heritage and cultural resources within Ku-ring-gai. The subject site is located within an area identified on the statutory maps and as such the draft LEP forms a consideration for the assessment of this application.

 

As a result of the plan, the subject site will be zoned ‘R2 Low Density Residential’ and the development is permissible within this zoning. The objectives of the zone are as follows:

 

(i)      To provide for the housing needs of the community within a low density residential environment.

(ii)     To enable other land uses that provide facilities or services to meet the day to day needs of residents.

(iii)    To provide housing that is compatible with the existing environmental and low density character of Ku-ring-gai

 

The subject proposal has a built form which is compatible with the existing low density character of the area and the land to be developed. Therefore, the proposal meets the objectives of the draft zone. Additionally, while the Draft LEP specifies a minimum subdivision size of 930m2 (exclusive of an access handle), the Draft instrument does not stipulate a minimum allotment area or width needed for the erection of a new dwelling, as opposed to the provisions in the KPSO. The maximum floor space ratio under the draft LEP is 0.328:1 and the floor space ratio of the development is 0.3:1. The maximum building height under the draft LEP is 9.5m and the building height of the development is 7.7m. The proposal is consistent with the objectives and development standards of the draft LEP.

POLICY PROVISIONS

 

Development Control Plan No. 38 - Ku-ring-gai Residential Design Manual

 

Development Control

Proposed

Complies

4.1 Streetscape:

Building setbacks (s.4.1.3)

 

 

Front setback:

14m (Ave) -75% front elevation

12m (min) – 25% front elevation

 

12.7m verandah

14.25m dwelling (min)

20.8m dwelling (max)

 

 

YES

YES

YES

Side setback:

Ground floor:  2m(min)

First floor:  2.6m (min)

 

Southern

GF 1.65m – 3.97m

FF 3.4m – 5.29m

 

Northern

GF 1.5m – 8.86m

FF - 3.47m

 

 

 

NO

YES

 

 

NO

YES

 

Rear setback:  12m(min)

 

18.1m

YES

Front fences (s.4.1.5)

 

 

Height:  1.2m(max)

 

N/A

N/A

4.2 Building form:

FSR (s.4.2.1)   0.328:1 (434m2)(max)

 

0.366:1

Ground floor: 344m2

First floor: 92m2

Basement: 80m2

Total: 485m2

NO

 

Height of building (s.4.2.2)

 

 

2 storey (max) and

8m (site >200 slope) or

7m (site <200 slope)

 

2 storeys &

6.64m

YES

YES

Building height plane (s.4.2.3)

450 from horizontal at any point 3m above boundary

 

Eaves encroach on the northern and southern (side) elevations

 

NO

First floor (s.4.2.4)

 

 

FSR: < 40% total FSR

 

18.2%

YES

Roof Line (s.4.2.6)

 

 

Roof height

(3m – two+ storey)

 

<3m

 

YES

Roof pitch    350 (max)

 

200

YES

Built-upon area (s.4.2.7) 

50% (max)

 

 

48.8% (645.35m2)

 

YES

Unrelieved wall length (s.4.2.8)

12m (max)where wall height<4m high

8m (max) where wall height >4m high

 

 

No non-compliant walls

 

 

YES

Solar access (4.2.11)

4h solar access to adjoining properties between 9am to 3pm

 

 

At least 4 hours provided

 

YES

Cut & fill (s.4.2.14)

 

 

Max cut 900mm

 

2200mm (subfloor below laundry)

 

NO

 

Max fill 900mm

1470mm (below lounge room)

NO

Maximum level difference over building area: 1800mm

4350mm

NO

Maximum level difference at any one point: 900mm

1470mm

NO

No cut or fill within side setbacks

 

Cut and fill in side setbacks

NO

4.3 Open space & landscaping:

Soft landscaping area (4.3.3)

50% (min)

 

 

51.2%

 

YES

Tree replenishment (s.4.3.6)

7 Trees required

 

 

7 trees provided

 

YES

Landscaping cut & fill (4.3.7)

 

 

max cut or fill 500mm relative to natural ground

Cut - 1300mm

Fill 450mm

NO

YES

no cut & fill within 2m of boundary

 

 

NO

Useable open space (s.4.3.8)

Min depth 5m and min area 50m2

 

 

Depth >5m     

Area >50m2

 

 

YES

YES

4.4 Privacy & security:

Refer discussion below.

 

4.5 Access & parking:

No. of car parking spaces (s.4.5.1)

2 spaces behind building line

 

2 spaces behind building line

 

YES

Size of car parking space (s.4.5.2)

5.6m x 5.4m

 

6.33m x 11.5m

 

YES

Carport/garage <6m in width or <40% site width whichever is the lesser

 

6.33m and 38%

 

 

NO

Driveway width (s.4.5.6)  3.5m

 

3.5m

YES

4.6 Ancillary facilities:

Swimming pools (s.4.6.1)

 

 

Setback from boundary:  2m

Plunge pool - 2m

Spa – 1.4m

YES

NO

 

Pool coping <500mm above ground level

<500mm

YES

 

Pool excavation not below the canopy of trees

 

No excavation below canopy of trees

YES

 

Part 4.1 – Streetscape

 

The objectives of Part 4.1 are:

 

(a)     To ensure that the development is sensitive to the landscape setting, environmental conditions and established character of the street and locality.

(b)     To ensure that the appearance of new development is of a high visual quality, enhances the streetscape and complements good quality surrounding development.

(c)     To conserve the natural, built and cultural significance of streetscapes of heritage value.

 

Side setback

 

The northern and southern (side) ground floor elevations are set back a minimum of 1.5 metres and 1.65 metres respectively, breaching the minimum 2 metres required by the DCP control.

 

The assessment criteria for the side setback control are:

 

·    maintain streetscape character

·    ensure the amenity of neighbouring properties is maintained or enhanced

·    allow for the provision of landscape and provide room for additional tree plantings to grow to maturity

·    facilitate solar access

·    protection significant vegetation

 

The northern elevation of the building where a 1.5 metres side setback is proposed is situated to the south of a two storey dwelling under construction at 6 Ignatius Road. This dwelling was approved under a complying development certificate. The dwelling has a two storey high unrelieved wall on its southern elevation with a length of 21.8 metres and side setback of 1.75 metres. Whilst not considered to be an example of building design that reflects the objectives of DCP 38 and which should be used as a precedent to guide development, the non-compliant setback of 1.5 metres for an articulated single storey wall compares favourably to the 21.8 metres long unarticulated two storey wall of the adjacent dwelling. The proposed setbacks are compatible with the streetscape.

 

The development is well articulated and the variations to the setback controls are minor. The setback non-compliance of 500mm on the northern elevation relates to a wall length of 11.6 metres which is 33% of the length of the elevation and the setback non-compliance of 350mm on the southern elevation relates to a wall length of less than 1 metre and occurs at the point along the boundary where the site width changes from 16 metres to 18 metres. The variations to the setback control does not relate to portions of the building which meet or exceed the height limit.

The floor area of the first floor level is less than the maximum 40% permitted and has greater setbacks than the minimums permitted. The single storey portions of the building which do not comply with the side setback requirements will not have a significant impact on the amenity of adjoining properties.

 

The non-compliant setbacks would not unreasonably impact upon solar access to neighbouring properties. Despite the proposed building being situated to the north of the backyards of two adjacent dwellings solar access to the private open space and living areas of these dwellings complies with the DCP controls.

 

Significant vegetation is not contained within the side setback areas, however adequate space has been provided to enable suitable screen planting for a site which is bush fire prone.

 

Part 4.2 - Building form:

 

Floor space ratio

 

The DCP specifies a maximum FSR of 0.328:1 (434m2) for a site of this size and the proposal will result in a floor space ratio of 0.366:1 (485m2), a variation of 51m2 (11%).

 

The assessment criteria for the FSR control are:

 

·    ensure the scale of such new development is not excessive and relates well to the local context and streetscape;

·    limit the bulk of such new dwellings so that they do not dominate the treed landscape of Ku-ring-gai and there is sufficient space on the site for the provision of an adequate number of medium to large trees; and

·    minimise the impact of such development on significant views from and solar access to adjoining residential properties.

 

The design of the dwelling has been articulated, through varied setbacks, to negate any unreasonable bulk and scale impacts upon the amenity of neighbouring properties. The two storey scale of the development is consistent with the scale of surrounding two storey development and the building height is less than the adjoining two storey dwelling at 6 Ignatius Road.

 

The basement style garage has an area of 80m2 which exceeds the 31m2 concession available for all garages including those which are located at or above the natural ground level. The garage door and roof structure will be visible from the front elevation however the side walls of the garage are only partially visible as the garage floor is predominantly located below ground level. It is considered that only the front 3.1m or 19m2 portion of the structure adds meaningful bulk to the building. The DCP allows for 31m2 of garage space to be excluded from the floor space ratio calculation. This concession is available for all garages, including those which have a floor that is at or above the natural ground level. However the subject building has a basement style garage and only 19m2 of the garage adds meaningful bulk to the building. If the 31m2 concession is was applied to the front 19m2 of the garage which does add bulk to the building and the remaining part of the concession (12m2) was applied to the habitable parts of the dwelling the total floor space area would be 424m2, which is less than the control which allows up to 434m2. Despite the numerical non compliance with the floor space ratio control, the bulk and scale of the proposed dwelling is similar to a dwelling with a compliant floor space ratio and an at grade garage.

 

The proposed built upon area is 48.8% and is compliant with the maximum 50% built upon area control of DCP 38 and the 60% maximum built upon area development standard of the KPSO. The proposed dwelling has appropriate setbacks from the front, side and rear boundaries and sufficient space for new plantings is provided. The proposal includes the implementation of a landscape plan which includes canopy tree planting that will maintain and enhance the treed landscape of Ku-ring-gai.

 

The development will not have an unreasonable impact on significant views from adjoining properties as the footprint of the building and the height is compliant with the development standards for built-upon area and building height. The development will maintain a minimum of 4 hours solar access to adjoining properties as required by part 4.2.11 ‘Solar Access’.

 

Number of storeys

 

The proposed development has three levels and a maximum height of two storeys. The building is not three storeys in height as the garage is not located below the ground floor and first floor and the subfloor area behind the garage has a ceiling which is less than 1m above the natural ground level so it is not counted as a storey.

 

Building height plane

 

As stated in section 4.2.3 of DCP 38, development should avoid the creation of an overbearing effect upon adjoining development in order to:

 

·           maintain the relative scale relationship between buildings;

·           ensure that daylight to habitable rooms in adjacent dwellings is not significantly reduced;

·           ensure that sunlight to the private open spaces of the subject property and adjacent properties is not significantly reduced; and

·          encourage increased setback with increased height.

 

The proposed development does not comply with the building height plane control as the eaves on the northern and southern (side) elevations project outside the building height plane. These minor encroachments by the eaves do not result in an unacceptable scale relationship between buildings or a reduction in daylight and sunlight access. The variation to the building height plane control is therefore supported.

 

Cut & fill

 

In order to accommodate the construction of the proposed dwelling house, cut to a maximum depth of 2200mm and fill to a depth of 1470mm is required. The non-compliance is supported for the following reasons:

 

·    the proposed excavation will not require the removal of any significant vegetation;

·    the cut of 2200mm is for the subfloor level below the laundry, the full depth of the cut is not visible from outside the dwelling

·    the fill of 1470mm occurs at the northern side of the dwelling below the media room, the extent of fill is apparent from outside the dwelling as the floor level is elevated above the natural ground level, however the maximum wall height of the building in this area is only 4.2 metres;

·    the level changes are a result of the split level design which aims to minimise bulk, scale and amenity impacts by responding to the natural topography of the site;

·    the topographical characteristics of the site will be largely retained.  

 

Cut & fill (side setbacks)

 

As the building does not comply with the minimum side setback requirements and cut and fill is required to accommodate the building platform there is a non compliance with the no cut or fill in side setbacks control. The objective of this control is to minimise impact on retained trees, the natural landscape and the water table. The cut and fill in the side setbacks will not impact on retained trees the natural landscape and the water table.

 

Landscaping cut and fill (s4.3.7)

 

The application proposes cut and fill that exceeds the maximum 500mm depth / height allowable under the DCP control. These non-compliances are largely attributable to the sloping nature of the site. The predominant existing topography of the site will be largely maintained and the proposed development will not unduly impact on existing significant vegetation, subject to conditions. Additionally, the new retaining walls required to support the proposed cut and fill will not unreasonably impact on neighbouring amenity. Therefore, the proposed development achieves the objectives underlying this DCP control. 

 

As the proposed building does not comply with the side setback controls earthworks within the required side setbacks will be required. As has been discussed above, the proposed side setbacks provide adequate separation between adjacent properties and would not impact unreasonably on adjacent occupiers.

 

Part 4.4 – Privacy and security

 

The proposed development is designed in a manner that maintains sufficient visual and acoustic privacy to neighbouring properties. The windows largely associated with the high use internal areas of the dwelling are located at the ground floor of the building, either highlight windows, have large setbacks or present to the rear of the dwelling. The verandahs are largely on grade or below grade and will not unreasonably impact the amenity of adjoining properties.

 

The proposed plunge pool is located on the northern side of the dwelling in a courtyard that has a finished level up to 1000mm below the existing ground level. The plans for the adjoining dwelling show that the windows adjacent to the plunge pool serve a powder room, laundry, pantry and kitchen. These rooms are not particularly sensitive to acoustic impacts and the finished level of the patio being lower than the existing ground level will assist in minimising noise transmission between the adjacent dwellings. A standard condition with restrictions on noise emissions from the pool/spa equipment is recommended (Condition 54).

 

The proposed development provides sufficient security provisions, including opportunities for casual surveillance.

 

Part 4.5 – Access and parking

 

Section 4.5.3 of DCP 38 states that garage structures should be sympathetic to existing development on site and adjacent properties and should not dominate the site or the streetscape. DCP 38 also requires the width of the garage to be no greater than 6 metres.

 

The proposed garage has an overall width of 6.33 metres with a 5.35 metres wide door. The width of the garage is 48% of the width of the dwelling and 38% of the street frontage width. The front wall of the garage is set back 850mm from the balustrade of the front verandah and the two columns of the portico. The garage roof is a partial hipped roof form which matches the main roof of the dwelling. The proposal integrates the garage into the design of the dwelling and the width of the garage is less than 40% of the street frontage width. The garage does not dominate the site or the streetscape.

 

Part 4.6 - Ancillary facilities:

 

Section 4.6.1 of DCP 38 requires a setback of 2 metres from the boundary to the swimming pool coping. The plunge pool has a 2 metres setback and the spa has a 1.5 metres setback. The objective of the setback control is to provide substantial landscape planting to minimise potentially adverse impacts such as noise, glare and visual intrusion.  Council’s Landscape Officer is satisfied that the proposal provides a suitable amount of screen planting between the spa and the boundary fencing and that the objectives of the control are achieved.

 

Development Control Plan No. 40 – Construction and Demolition Waste Management

 

A waste management plan has been submitted and is deemed to be acceptable. 

 

Development Control Plan No. 43 – Car Parking

 

This DCP was considered in the assessment by Council’s Development Engineer and the development is acceptable in this regard.

 

Development Control Plan No. 47 – Water Management

 

This DCP was considered in the assessment by Council’s Development Engineer and the development is acceptable in this regard.

 

Section 94 Development Contribution

 

A section 94 contribution is payable as the two lots currently known as 6 and 6A Ignatius Road originally contained one dwelling. Approval to demolish this dwelling was granted under a complying development certificate issued in 2012 and construction of a new dwelling on 6 Ignatius Road has commenced. As the number of dwellings has been increased from one to two a section 94 contribution is payable. The contribution is split 50/50 between each of the new dwellings. A condition (Condition 23) requiring payment of the section 94 contribution has been included in the recommendation.

 

Likely Impacts

 

The impacts of the proposed development have been considered and are deemed to be acceptable, subject to conditions. 

 

Suitability of the Site

 

The site is considered to be suitable for the proposed development.

 

Public Interest

 

The public interest is best served by the consistent application of the requirements of the relevant Environmental Planning Instruments and by Council ensuring that any adverse effects on the surrounding area and the environment are minimised. The proposal has been assessed against the relevant environmental planning instruments and is deemed to be acceptable. Accordingly, the proposal is recommended for approval. 

 

Conclusion

 

Having regard to the provisions of section 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, the proposed development is considered to be satisfactory. Therefore, it is recommended that the application be approved.

 

Recommendation:

 

PURSUANT TO SECTION 80(1) OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT ACT, 1979

 

A.       THAT Council, as the consent authority, is of the opinion that the objection under State Environmental Planning Policy No. 1 – Development Standards to clause 58B – allotment width of the Ku-ring-gai Planning Scheme Ordinance is well founded.  The Council is also of the opinion that strict compliance with the development standard is unreasonable and unnecessary in the circumstances of this case as the objectives of the standard are achieved notwithstanding the failure to achieve compliance with the development standard.

 

AND

 

B.       THAT Council, as the consent authority, being satisfied that the objection under  SEPP No. 1 is well founded and also being of the opinion that the granting of consent to DA0318/13 is consistent with the aims of the Policy, grant development consent to DA0318/13 for ‘construction of a two storey dwelling house including attached secondary dwelling, swimming pool and spa on land at 6A Ignatius Road Lindfield, for a period of two (2) years from the date of the Notice of Determination, subject to the following conditions:

 

1.     Approved architectural plans and documentation (new development)

 

The development must be carried out in accordance with the following plans and documentation listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, except where amended by other conditions of this consent:

 

Plan no.

Drawn by

Dated

975.DA1/5A, issue A, site plan and built upon area plan

Ross Morton Sundesign

15 November 2013

975.DA2/5A, ground floor plan

Ross Morton Sundesign

undated

975.DA3/5A, first floor plan, basement floor plan

Ross Morton Sundesign

undated

975.DA4/5A, elevations

Ross Morton Sundesign

undated

975.DA5/5A, sections

Ross Morton Sundesign

undated

975.NC1, proposed noise control fence and pool pump location plan

Ross Morton Sundesign

30/1/2014

L-01, revision D, landscape Plan

Ecodesign

8 August 2013 and received by Council on 26 August 2013

D1 Issue A, Legend, notes, details calculations

Storm Civil

7/08/2013

D2 Issue A, Stormwater Management Plan

Storm Civil

7/08/2013

 

Document(s)

Dated

Basix certificate No. 488394S_04

28 November 2013

Bush fire risk assessment and certification, reference Number 130814

updated 27 February 2014

Waste Management Plan

16/08/2013

 

Reason:    To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

 

2.     Inconsistency between documents

 

In the event of any inconsistency between conditions of this consent and the drawings/documents referred to above, the conditions of this consent prevail.

 

Reason:    To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

 

3.     Approved landscape plans

 

Landscape works shall be carried out in accordance with the following landscape plan(s), listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, except where amended by other conditions of this consent:

 

Plan no.

Drawn by

Dated

# L-01 Rev D

ecodesign

08/08/2013

 

Reason:    To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to demolition, excavation or construction:

 

4.     Asbestos works

 

All work involving asbestos products and materials, including asbestos-cement-sheeting (ie. Fibro), must be carried out in accordance with the guidelines for asbestos work published by WorkCover Authority of NSW.

 

Reason:    To ensure public safety

 

5.     Notice of commencement

 

At least 48 hours prior to the commencement of any development (including demolition, excavation, shoring or underpinning works), a notice of commencement of building or subdivision work form and appointment of the principal certifying authority form shall be submitted to Council.

 

Reason:    Statutory requirement.

 

6.     Notification of builder’s details

 

Prior to the commencement of any development or excavation works, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be notified in writing of the name and contractor licence number of the owner/builder intending to carry out the approved works.

 

Reason:    Statutory requirement.

 

7.     Dilapidation photos (public infrastructure)

 

Prior to the commencement of any works on site the applicant must submit to Ku-ring-gai Council and the Principal Certifying Authority a photographic record on the visible condition of the existing public infrastructure over the full site frontage (in colour - preferably saved to cd-rom in ‘jpg’ format). The photos must include detail of:

 

        The existing footpath

        The existing kerb and gutter

        The existing full road surface between kerbs

        The existing verge area

        The existing driveway and layback where to be retained

        Any existing drainage infrastructure including pits, lintels, grates.

 

Particular attention must be paid to accurately recording any pre-developed damaged areas on the aforementioned infrastructure so that Council is fully informed when assessing damage to public infrastructure caused as a result of the development (which is not to be repaired by the Applicant as part of the development). The developer may be held liable to all damage to public infrastructure in the vicinity of the site, where such damage is not accurately recorded and demonstrated under the requirements of this condition prior to the commencement of any works.

 

Reason:    To protect public infrastructure.

 

8.     Tree protection fencing

 

To preserve the following tree/s, no work shall commence until the area beneath their canopy is fenced off at the specified radius from the trunk/s to prevent any activities, storage or the disposal of materials within the fenced area.  The fence/s shall be maintained intact until the completion of all demolition/building work on site.

 

Tree/Location

Radius from trunk

T1 & 2 Tibouchina lepidota ‘Alstonville’ Ignatius Rd nature strip

3.0m

T3 Cryptomeria japonica (Japanese Cedar) Adjacent to southern site corner

4.0m

T4 Angophora costata (Sydney Red Gum) Front garden

5.0m on eastern side 7.5m elsewhere

T8 Angophora costata (Sydney red Gum) Centrally located in rear setback

8.0m

T9 - T11 Syncarpia glomulifera (Turpentine) Adjacent to rear site boundary

4.0m

T12 Syncarpia glomulifera (Turpentine) Adjacent to rear site boundary

7.5m

 

Reason:    To protect existing trees during the construction phase.

 

9.     Tree protective fencing type galvanised mesh

 

The tree protection fencing shall be constructed of galvanised pipe at 2.4 metre spacing and connected by securely attached chain mesh fencing to a minimum height of 1.8 metres in height prior to work commencing.

 

Reason:   To protect existing trees during construction phase.

 

10.   Tree protection signage

 

Prior to works commencing, tree protection signage is to be attached to each tree protection zone, displayed in a prominent position and the sign repeated at 10 metres intervals or closer where the fence changes direction.  Each sign shall contain in a clearly legible form, the following information:

 

Tree protection zone.

 

        This fence has been installed to prevent damage to the trees and their growing environment both above and below ground and access is restricted.

        Any encroachment not previously approved within the tree protection zone shall be the subject of an arborist's report.

        The arborist's report shall provide proof that no other alternative is available.

        The Arborist's report shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority for further consultation with Council.

        The name, address, and telephone number of the developer.

 

Reason:    To protect existing trees during the construction phase.

 

11.   Tree protection mulching

 

Prior to works commencing and throughout construction, the area of the tree protection zone is to be mulched to a depth of 100mm with composted organic material being 75% Eucalyptus leaf litter and 25% wood.

 

Reason:    To protect existing trees during the construction phase.

 

12.   Tree fencing inspection

 

Upon installation of the required tree protection measures, an inspection of the site by the project arborist is required to verify that tree protection measures comply with all relevant conditions. Written certification of correct tree protection installation shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority

 

Reason:    To protect existing trees during the construction phase.

 

13.   Construction waste management plan

 

Prior to the commencement of any works, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a waste management plan, prepared by a suitably qualified person, has been prepared in accordance with Council’s DCP 40 - Construction and Demolition Waste Management.

 

The plan shall address all issues identified in DCP 40, including but not limited to: the estimated volume of waste and method for disposal for the construction and operation phases of the development.

 

Note:              The plan shall be provided to the Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:    To ensure appropriate management of construction waste.

 

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of the construction certificate:

 

 

14.   Amendments to approved landscape plan

 

Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the approved landscape plans, listed below, amended in red ink and endorsed with Council’s stamp, have been amended in accordance with the requirements of this condition as well as other conditions of this consent:

 

Plan no.

Drawn by

Dated

L-01 D

ecodesign

08/08/2013

 

The above landscape plan(s) shall be amended in the following ways:

 

        T3 is to be shown to be retained.

        The landscape plan is to be amended showing the amended dwelling and retaining wall locations as detailed on the approved architectural plans.

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the landscape plan has been amended as required by this condition.

 

Note:         An amended plan, prepared by a landscape architect or qualified landscape designer shall be submitted to the Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:   To ensure adequate landscaping of the site

 

15.   Privacy

 

To ensure that privacy and visual amenity is maintained the following measure(s) shall be implemented:

 

        The first floor stairwell window within the southern elevation is to be of obscure glazing.

 

Note:         Adhesive film is not acceptable and normal double hung windows with the bottom panel fixed are also not permitted as the fixing can easily be reversed.

 

Reason:    To maintain neighbour amenity.

 

16.   Long service levy

 

In accordance with Section 109F(i) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act a Construction Certificate shall not be issued until any long service levy payable under Section 34 of the Building and Construction Industry Long Service Payments Act 1986 (or where such levy is payable by instalments, the first instalment of the levy) has been paid. Council is authorised to accept payment. Where payment has been made elsewhere, proof of payment is to be provided to Council.

 

Reason:    Statutory requirement.

 

17.   Builder’s indemnity insurance

 

The applicant, builder, developer or person who does the work on this development, must arrange builder’s indemnity insurance and submit the certificate of insurance in accordance with the requirements of Part 6 of the Home Building Act 1989 to the Certifying Authority for endorsement of the plans accompanying the Construction Certificate.

 

It is the responsibility of the applicant, builder or developer to arrange the builder's indemnity insurance for residential building work over the value of $20,000. The builder's indemnity insurance does not apply to commercial or industrial building work or to residential work valued at less than $20,000, nor to work undertaken by persons holding an owner/builder's permit issued by the Department of Fair Trading (unless the owner/builder's property is sold within 7 years of the commencement of the work).

 

Reason:    Statutory requirement.

 

18.   Stormwater management plan (new single dwellings)

 

Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, the applicant must submit, for approval by the Principal Certifying Authority, scaled construction plans and specifications in relation to the stormwater management and disposal system for the development. The plan(s) must be based on Stormwater Management Plan, Job No. 109039 D1 & D2 Issue A dated 7 August 2013 prepared by StormCivil Engineering Solutions Pty Ltd and must include the following detail:

 

        exact location and reduced level of discharge point to the public drainage system

        layout of the property drainage system components, including but not limited to (as required) gutters, downpipes, pits, grated drains, swales, kerbs, flushing facilities, subsoil drainage and all ancillary plumbing - all designed for a 235mm/hour rainfall intensity for a duration of five (5) minutes (1:50 year storm recurrence)

        location(s), dimensions and specifications for the required rainwater storage and reuse tank systems and where proprietary products are to be used, manufacturer specifications and details must be provided

        specifications for reticulated pumping facilities (including pump type and manufacturer specifications) and ancillary plumbing to fully utilise rainwater in accordance with BASIX commitments

 

The above construction drawings and specifications are to be prepared by a suitably qualified and experienced civil/hydraulic engineer in accordance with Council’s Water Management Development Control Plan 47, Australian Standards 3500.2 and 3500.3 - Plumbing and Drainage Code and the BCA.

 

Reason:    To protect the environment.

 

19.   Screen planting plan

 

A plan detailing screen planting adjacent to that part of the southern side boundary of the site which adjoins the rear boundary of 35 Polding Road, Lindfield shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority and approved by a Landscape Architect or qualified Landscape Designer prior to release of the Construction Certificate.  The plan shall incorporate species of type suitable for the site conditions and location on site, capable of attaining a height of 4 metres in height. The screen planting must comply with the requirements of the Bushfire report and Certification prepared by Building code & Bushfire Hazard Solutions Pty Limited, reference No. 130814, updated 27 February 2014 and Planning for Bushfire Protection 2006.

 

Reason:    To ensure adequate landscaping of the site.

 

20.   Driveway crossing levels

 

Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, driveway and associated footpath levels for any new, reconstructed or extended sections of driveway crossings between the property boundary and road alignment must be obtained from Ku-ring-gai Council. Such levels are only able to be issued by Council under the Roads Act 1993.  All footpath crossings, laybacks and driveways are to be constructed according to Council's specifications "Construction of Gutter Crossings and Footpath Crossings".

 

Specifications are issued with alignment levels after completing the necessary application form at Customer Services and payment of the assessment fee. When completing the request for driveway levels application from Council, the applicant must attach a copy of the relevant development application drawing which indicates the position and proposed level of the proposed driveway at the boundary alignment.

 

This development consent is for works wholly within the property. Development consent does not imply approval of footpath or driveway levels, materials or location within the road reserve, regardless of whether this information is shown on the development application plans. The grading of such footpaths or driveways outside the property shall comply with Council's standard requirements.  The suitability of the grade of such paths or driveways inside the property is the sole responsibility of the applicant and the required alignment levels fixed by Council may impact upon these levels.

 

The construction of footpaths and driveways outside the property in materials other than those approved by Council is not permitted.

 

Council will provide a  quotation for  the construction of a pipe crossing upon application prior to Construction Certificate.

 

Reason:    To provide suitable vehicular access without disruption to pedestrian and vehicular traffic.

 

21.   Vehicular access and garaging

 

Driveways and vehicular access ramps must be designed not to scrape the underside of cars. In all respects, the proposed vehicle access and accommodation arrangements must be designed and constructed to comply with Australian Standard 2890.1 - 2004 “Off-Street car parking”. Details are to be provided to and approved by the Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate.

 

Reason:    To ensure that parking spaces are in accordance with the approved development.

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of the construction certificate or prior to demolition, excavation or construction (whichever comes first):

 

22.   Infrastructure restorations fee

 

To ensure that damage to Council Property as a result of construction activity is rectified in a timely matter:

 

a)       All work or activity taken in furtherance of the development the subject of this approval must be undertaken in a manner to avoid damage to Council Property and must not jeopardise the safety of any person using or occupying the adjacent public areas.

 

b)       The applicant, builder, developer or any person acting in reliance on this approval shall be responsible for making good any damage to Council Property, and for the removal from Council Property of any waste bin, building materials, sediment, silt, or any other material or article.

 

c)       The Infrastructure Restoration Fee must be paid to the Council by the applicant prior to both the issue of the Construction Certificate and the commencement of any earthworks or construction.

 

d)       In consideration of payment of the Infrastructure Restorations Fee, Council will undertake such inspections of Council Property as Council considers necessary and also undertake, on behalf of the applicant, such restoration work to Council Property, if any, that Council considers necessary as a consequence of the development. The provision of such restoration work by the Council does not absolve any person of the responsibilities contained in (a) to (b) above. Restoration work to be undertaken by the Council referred to in this condition is limited to work that can be undertaken by Council at a cost of not more than the Infrastructure Restorations Fee payable pursuant to this condition.

 

e)       In this condition:

 

“Council Property” includes any road, footway, footpath paving, kerbing, guttering, crossings, street furniture, seats, letter bins, trees, shrubs, lawns, mounds, bushland, and similar structures or features on any road or public road within the meaning of the Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) or any public place; and

 

“Infrastructure Restoration Fee” means the Infrastructure Restorations Fee calculated in accordance with the Schedule of Fees & Charges adopted by Council as at the date of payment and the cost of any inspections required by the Council of Council Property associated with this condition.

 

Reason:    To maintain public infrastructure.

 

23.   Section 94 development contributions - other than identified centres

(For DAs determined on or after 19 December 2010).

 

This development is subject to a development contribution calculated in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010, being a s94 Contributions Plan in effect under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, as follows:

 

Key Community Infrastructure

Amount

Local parks and local sporting facilities

$1462.54

Local recreation and cultural facilities;  Local social facilities

$8,651.55

Total:

$10,114.09

 

The contribution shall be paid to Council prior to the issue of any Construction Certificate, Linen Plan, Certificate of Subdivision or Occupation Certificate whichever comes first in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010.

 

The contributions specified above are subject to indexation and may vary at the time of payment in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 to reflect changes in the consumer price index and housing price index.  Prior to payment, please contact Council directly to verify the current payable contributions.

 

Copies of Council’s Contribution Plans can be viewed at Council Chambers, 818 Pacific Hwy Gordon or on Council’s website at www.kmc.nsw.gov.au.

 

Reason:    To ensure the provision, extension or augmentation of the Key Community Infrastructure identified in Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 that will, or is likely to be, required as a consequence of the development.

 

24.   Bush fire risk certification

 

Bush fire protection measures shall be carried out in accordance with the following bush fire risk assessment, report and certificate, listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, except where amended by other conditions of this consent:

 

Document title

Prepared by

Dated

Bushfire Hazard Assessment Report

Building Code & Bushfire Hazard Solutions Pty Ltd

Updated 27 February 2014

 

Prior to the issue of the construction certificate, the principal certifying authority must be satisfied that the construction certificate is in accordance with the recommendations of the report and certificate as listed above.

 

Reason:    To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

 

Conditions to be satisfied during the demolition, excavation and construction phases:

 

25.   Road opening permit

 

The opening of any footway, roadway, road shoulder or any part of the road reserve shall not be carried out without a road opening permit being obtained from Council (upon payment of the required fee) beforehand.

 

Reason:    Statutory requirement (Roads Act 1993 Section 138) and to maintain the integrity of Council’s infrastructure.

 

26.   Prescribed conditions

 

The applicant shall comply with any relevant prescribed conditions of development consent under clause 98 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation. For the purposes of section 80A (11) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, the following conditions are prescribed in relation to a development consent for development that involves any building work:

 

        The work must be carried out in accordance with the requirements of the Building Code of Australia

        In the case of residential building work for which the Home Building Act 1989 requires there to be a contract of insurance in force in accordance with Part 6 of that Act, that such a contract of insurance is in force before any works commence.

 

Reason:    Statutory requirement.

 

27.   Hours of work

 

Demolition, excavation, construction work and deliveries of building material and equipment must not take place outside the hours of 7.00am to 5.00pm Monday to Friday and 8.00am to 12 noon Saturday. No work and no deliveries are to take place on Sundays and public holidays.

 

Excavation or removal of any materials using machinery of any kind, including compressors and jack hammers, must be limited to between 7.30am and 5.00pm Monday to Friday, with a respite break of 45 minutes between 12 noon 1.00pm.

 

Where it is necessary for works to occur outside of these hours (ie) placement of concrete for large floor areas on large residential/commercial developments or where building processes require the use of oversized trucks and/or cranes that are restricted by the RTA from travelling during daylight hours to deliver, erect or remove machinery, tower cranes, pre-cast panels, beams, tanks or service equipment to or from the site, approval for such activities will be subject to the issue of an "outside of hours works permit" from Council as well as notification of the surrounding properties likely to be affected by the proposed works.

 

Note:         Failure to obtain a permit to work outside of the approved hours will result in on the spot fines being issued.

 

Reason:    To ensure reasonable standards of amenity for occupants of neighbouring properties.

 

 

28.   Approved plans to be on site

 

A copy of all approved and certified plans, specifications and documents incorporating conditions of consent and certification (including the Construction Certificate if required for the work) shall be kept on site at all times during the demolition, excavation and construction phases and must be readily available to any officer of Council or the Principal Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:    To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

 

29.   Statement of compliance with Australian Standards

 

The demolition work shall comply with the provisions of Australian Standard AS2601: 2001 The Demolition of Structures. The work plans required by AS2601: 2001 shall be accompanied by a written statement from a suitably qualified person that the proposal contained in the work plan comply with the safety requirements of the Standard. The work plan and the statement of compliance shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the commencement of any works.

 

Reason:    To ensure compliance with the Australian Standards.

 

30.   Site notice

 

A site notice shall be erected on the site prior to any work commencing and shall be displayed throughout the works period.

 

The site notice must:

 

        be prominently displayed at the boundaries of the site for the purposes of informing the public that unauthorised entry to the site is not permitted

        display project details including, but not limited to the details of the builder, Principal Certifying Authority and structural engineer

        be durable and weatherproof

        display the approved hours of work, the name of the site/project manager, the responsible managing company (if any), its address and 24 hour contact phone number for any inquiries, including construction/noise complaint are to be displayed on the site notice

        be mounted at eye level on the perimeter hoardings/fencing and is to state that unauthorised entry to the site is not permitted

 

Reason:    To ensure public safety and public information.

 

31.   Dust control

 

During excavation, demolition and construction, adequate measures shall be taken to prevent dust from affecting the amenity of the neighbourhood. The following measures must be adopted:

 

        physical barriers shall be erected at right angles to the prevailing wind direction or shall be placed around or over dust sources to prevent wind or activity from generating dust

        earthworks and scheduling activities shall be managed to coincide with the next stage of development to minimise the amount of time the site is left cut or exposed

        all materials shall be stored or stockpiled at the best locations

        the ground surface should be dampened slightly to prevent dust from becoming airborne but should not be wet to the extent that run-off occurs

        all vehicles carrying spoil or rubble to or from the site shall at all times be covered to prevent the escape of dust

        all equipment wheels shall be washed before exiting the site using manual or automated sprayers and drive-through washing bays

        gates shall be closed between vehicle movements and shall be fitted with shade cloth

        cleaning of footpaths and roadways shall be carried out daily

 

Reason:    To protect the environment and amenity of surrounding properties.

 

32.   Use of road or footpath

 

During excavation, demolition and construction phases, no building materials, plant or the like are to be stored on the road or footpath without written approval being obtained from Council beforehand.  The pathway shall be kept in a clean, tidy and safe condition during building operations.  Council reserves the right, without notice, to rectify any such breach and to charge the cost against the applicant/owner/builder, as the case may be.

 

Reason:    To ensure safety and amenity of the area.

 

 

33.   Guarding excavations

 

All excavation, demolition and construction works shall be properly guarded and protected with hoardings or fencing to prevent them from being dangerous to life and property.

 

Reason:    To ensure public safety.

 

 

34.   Toilet facilities

 

During excavation, demolition and construction phases, toilet facilities are to be provided, on the work site, at the rate of one toilet for every 20 persons or part of 20 persons employed at the site.

 

Reason:    Statutory requirement.

 

 

35.   Protection of public places

 

If the work involved in the erection, demolition or construction of the development is likely to cause pedestrian or vehicular traffic in a public place to be obstructed or rendered inconvenient, or building involves the enclosure of a public place, a hoarding or fence must be erected between the work site and the public place.

 

If necessary, a hoarding is to be erected, sufficient to prevent any substance from, or in connection with, the work falling into the public place.

 

The work site must be kept lit between sunset and sunrise if it is likely to be hazardous to persons in the public place.

 

Any hoarding, fence or awning is to be removed when the work has been completed.

 

Reason:    To protect public places.

 

36.   Road reserve safety

 

All public footways and roadways fronting and adjacent to the site must be maintained in a safe condition at all times during the course of the development works. Construction materials must not be stored in the road reserve. A safe pedestrian circulation route and a pavement/route free of trip hazards must be maintained at all times on or adjacent to any public access ways fronting the construction site.  Where public infrastructure is damaged, repair works must be carried out when and as directed by Council officers. Where pedestrian circulation is diverted on to the roadway or verge areas, clear directional signage and protective barricades must be installed in accordance with AS1742-3 (1996) “Traffic Control Devices for Work on Roads”. If pedestrian circulation is not satisfactorily maintained across the site frontage, and action is not taken promptly to rectify the defects, Council may undertake proceedings to stop work.

 

Reason:    To ensure safe public footways and roadways during construction.

 

37.   Services

 

Where required, the adjustment or inclusion of any new utility service facilities must be carried out by the applicant and in accordance with the requirements of the relevant utility authority. These works shall be at no cost to Council. It is the applicants’ full responsibility to make contact with the relevant utility authorities to ascertain the impacts of the proposal upon utility services (including water, phone, gas and the like). Council accepts no responsibility for any matter arising from its approval to this application involving any influence upon utility services provided by another authority.

 

Reason:    Provision of utility services.

 

38.   Erosion control

 

Temporary sediment and erosion control and measures are to be installed prior to the commencement of any works on the site. These measures must be maintained in working order during construction works up to completion. All sediment traps must be cleared on a regular basis and after each major storm and/or as directed by the Principal Certifying Authority and Council officers.

 

Reason:    To protect the environment from erosion and sedimentation.

 

39.   Drainage to street

 

Stormwater runoff from all new impervious areas and subsoil drainage systems shall be piped to the street drainage system.  New drainage line connections to the street drainage system shall conform and comply with the requirements of Sections 5.3 and 5.4 of Ku-ring-gai Water Management Development Control Plan No. 47.

 

Reason:    To protect the environment.

 

40.   Driveway trench drain at boundary

 

A 200mm wide grated drain, with heavy duty removable galvanised grates is to be located within the site at the intersection of the driveway and Council's footway to collect all surface water flowing down the driveway.  The drainage line from the grated drain shall be connected to the street system, either separately or via the main site outlet.

 

Reason:    Stormwater control.

 

 

41.   Treatment of tree roots

 

If tree roots are severed for the purposes of constructing the approved works, they shall be cut cleanly by hand, by an experienced AQF3 Arborist/Horticulturist. All pruning works shall be undertaken as specified in Australian Standard 4373-2007 - Pruning of Amenity Trees.

 

Reason:    To protect existing trees.

 

42.   Cutting of tree roots

 

No tree roots of 30mm or greater in diameter located within the specified radius of the trunk/s of the following tree/s shall be severed or injured in the process of any works during the construction period.  All pruning works shall be undertaken as specified in Australian Standard 4373-2007 - Pruning of Amenity Trees:

 

Tree/Location

Radius from trunk

T1 & 2 Tibouchina lepidota ‘Alstonville’ Ignatius Rd nature strip

3.5m

T3 Cryptomeria japonica (Japanese Cedar) Adjacent to southern site corner

4.5m

T4 Angophora costata (Sydney Red Gum) Front garden

5.0m on eastern side 7.5m elsewhere

T7 Erythrina spp (Coral Tree) Adjacent to southeast site boundary in neighbouring property

4.0m on northern side

T8 Angophora costata (Sydney red Gum) Centrally located in rear setback

8.0m

T9 - T11 Syncarpia glomulifera (Turpentine) Adjacent to rear site boundary

4.0m

T12 Syncarpia glomulifera (Turpentine) Adjacent to rear site boundary

7.5m

 

Reason:    To protect existing trees.

 

43.   Approved tree works

 

Approval is given for the following works to be undertaken to trees on the site. All trees to be clearly numbered on site consistent with the Arboricultural Impact Assessment Report by arboreport dated 23/07/2013.

 

Tree/Location

Approved tree works

T5 Chamaecyparis obtusa (Japanese Cypress) Adjacent to southern site boundary

Removal

T6 Tristaniopsis laurina (Water Gum) Adjacent to southern site boundary

Removal

 

Removal or pruning of any other tree on the site is not approved, excluding species exempt under Council’s Tree Preservation Order.

 

Reason:    To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

44.   Hand excavation

 

All excavation within the specified radius of the trunk/s of the following tree/s shall be hand dug:

 

Tree/Location

Radius from trunk

T1 & 2 Tibouchina lepidota ‘Alstonville’ Ignatius Rd nature strip

3.5m

T3 Cryptomeria japonica (Japanese Cedar) Adjacent to southern site corner

4.5m

T4 Angophora costata (Sydney Red Gum) Front garden

5.0m on eastern side 7.5m elsewhere

T7 Erythrina spp (Coral Tree) Adjacent to southeast site boundary in neighbouring property

4.0m on northern side

T8 Angophora costata (Sydney red Gum) Centrally located in rear setback

8.0m

T9 - T11 Syncarpia glomulifera (Turpentine) Adjacent to rear site boundary

4.0m

T12 Syncarpia glomulifera (Turpentine) Adjacent to rear site boundary

7.5m

 

Reason:    To protect existing trees.

 

45.   No storage of materials beneath trees

 

No activities, storage or disposal of materials shall take place beneath the canopy of any tree protected under Council's Tree Preservation Order at any time.

 

Reason:    To protect existing trees.

 

46.   Removal of refuse

 

All builders' refuse, spoil and/or material unsuitable for use in landscape areas shall be removed from the site on completion of the building works.

 

Reason:    To protect the environment.

 

47.   On site retention of waste dockets

 

All demolition, excavation and construction waste dockets are to be retained on site, or at suitable location, in order to confirm which facility received materials generated from the site for recycling or disposal.

 

        Each docket is to be an official receipt from a facility authorised to accept the material type, for disposal or processing.

        This information is to be made available at the request of an Authorised Officer of Council.

 

Reason:   To protect the environment.

 

48.   Sydney Water Section 73 Compliance Certificate

 

The applicant must obtain a Section 73 Compliance Certificate under the Sydney Water Act 1994. An application must be made through an authorised Water Servicing CoOrdinator. The applicant is to refer to “Your Business” section of Sydney Water’s web site at www.sydneywater.com.au <http://www.sydneywater.com.au> then the “e-develop” icon or telephone 13 20 92. Following application a “Notice of Requirements” will detail water and sewer extensions to be built and charges to be paid. Please make early contact with the CoOrdinator, since building of water/sewer extensions can be time consuming and may impact on other services and building, driveway or landscape design.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate:

 

49.   Compliance with BASIX Certificate

 

Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that all commitments listed in BASIX Certificate No. 488394S_04 have been complied with.

 

Reason:    Statutory requirement.

 

50.   Completion of landscape works

 

Prior to the release of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that all landscape works, including the removal of all noxious and/or environmental weed species, have been undertaken in accordance with the approved plan(s) and conditions of consent.

 

Reason:    To ensure that the landscape works are consistent with the development consent.

 

51.   Retention and re-use positive covenant

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the applicant must create a positive covenant and restriction on the use of land under Section 88E of the Conveyancing Act 1919, burdening the property with the requirement to maintain the site stormwater retention and re-use facilities on the property.

 

The terms of the instruments are to be generally in accordance with the Council's "draft terms of Section 88B instruments for protection of retention and re-use facilities" and to the satisfaction of Council (refer to appendices of Ku-ring-gai Water Management Development Control Plan No. 47). For existing titles, the positive covenant and the restriction on the use of land is to be created through an application to the Land Titles Office in the form of a request using forms 13PC and 13RPA. The relative location of the reuse and retention facility, in relation to the building footprint, must be shown on a scale sketch, attached as an annexure to the request forms.

 

Registered title documents showing the covenants and restrictions must be submitted to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate.

 

Reason:    To protect the environment.

 

52.   Certification of drainage works (new single dwellings)

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that:

 

        the stormwater drainage works have been satisfactorily completed in accordance with the approved Construction Certificate drainage plans

        the minimum retention volume storage requirements of BASIX and Ku-ring-gai Water Management Development Control Plan No. 47 has been achieved in full

        retained water is connected and available for use

        the drainage system has been installed by a licensed contractor in accordance with the Plumbing and Drainage Code AS3500.3 (2003) and the Building Code of Australia

        all enclosed floor areas, including habitable and garage floor levels, are safeguarded from outside stormwater runoff ingress by suitable differences in finished levels, gradings and provision of stormwater collection devices

 

The rainwater certification sheet contained in Appendix 13 of Ku-ring-gai Water Management Development Control Plan No. 47, must be completed and attached to the certification.

 

Note:         Evidence from a qualified and experienced consulting civil/hydraulic engineer documenting compliance with the above is to be provided to Council prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate.

 

Reason:    To protect the environment.

 

53.   Infrastructure repair

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority must be satisfied that any damaged public infrastructure caused as a result of construction works (including damage caused by, but not limited to, delivery vehicles, waste collection, contractors, sub contractors, concrete vehicles) is fully repaired to the satisfaction of Council Development Engineer and at no cost to Council.

 

Reason:    To protect public infrastructure.

 

 

54.   Swimming pool (part 1)

 

Prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that:

 

1.         Access to the pool/spa shall be restricted by a child resistant barrier in accordance with the regulations prescribed in the Swimming Pools Act, 1992:

 

(a)     The pool shall not be filled with water or be allowed to collect stormwater until the child resistant barrier is installed; and

(b)     The barrier is to conform to the requirements of AS 1926-1 2012 Fences and Gates for Private Swimming Pools.

 

Reason:    To ensure the safety of children.

 

2.         Any mechanical equipment associated with the swimming pool and/or spa pool shall be located in a sound-attenuating enclosure and positioned so that it is setback a minimum of 2m from the boundary of any adjoining premises. The Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the sound levels associated with the swimming pool/spa filtration system and associated mechanical equipment do not exceed 5dB(A) above the background noise level at the boundaries of the site.

 

Reason:    To protect the amenity of surrounding properties.

 

 

55.   Compliance with bush fire assessment, report and certificate

 

Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that all recommendations listed in the bush fire risk assessment and report below have been complied with:

 

Document title

Prepared by

Dated

Bushfire Hazard Assessment Report

Building Code & Bushfire Hazard Solutions Pty Ltd

Updated 27 February 2014

 

Reason:    Statutory requirement.

 

56.   Sydney Water Section 73 Compliance Certificate

 

Prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate the Section 73 Sydney water Compliance Certificate must be obtained and submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority

 

Reason:    Statutory requirement.

 

Conditions to be satisfied at all times:

 

57.   Compliance with bush fire assessment, report and certificate at all times

In accordance with the recommendations listed in the bush fire risk assessment and report below, all on going recommendations must be complied with at all times.

Document title

Prepared by

Dated

Bushfire Hazard Assessment Report

Building Code & Bushfire Hazard Solutions Pty Ltd

Updated 27 February 2014

Reason: To protect against bush fire.

 

58.   Outdoor lighting

 

At all times for the life of the approved development, all outdoor lighting shall not detrimentally impact upon the amenity of other premises and adjacent dwellings and shall comply with, where relevant, AS/NZ1158.3: 1999 Pedestrian Area (Category P) Lighting and AS4282: 1997 Control of the Obtrusive Effects of Outdoor Lighting.

 

Reason:    To protect the amenity of surrounding properties.

 

59.   Noise control - plant and machinery

 

All noise generating equipment associated with any proposed mechanical ventilation system/s shall be located and/or soundproofed so the equipment is not audible within a habitable room in any other residential premises before 7am and after 10pm Monday to Friday and before 8am and after 10pm Saturday, Sunday and public holidays.  The operation of the unit outside these restricted hours shall emit a noise level of not greater than 5dbA above the background when measured at the nearest boundary.

 

Reason:    To protect the amenity of surrounding residents.

 

60.   Swimming pool (part 2)

 

At all times:

 

1.       Access to the swimming pool must be restricted by fencing or other measures as required by the Swimming Pools Act 1992.

 

2.       Noise levels associated with spa/pool pumping units shall not exceed 5dB(A) above the background noise level at the boundaries of the site.

 

3.       Devices or structures used for heating swimming pool water must not be placed where they are visible from a public place.

 

4.       For the purpose of health and amenity, the disposal of backwash and/or the emptying of a swimming pool into a reserve, watercourse, easement or storm water drainage system is prohibited. These waters are to discharge via a permanent drainage line into Sydney Water's sewer in accordance with Australian Standard AS3500.2 section 10.9. Permission is to be obtained from Sydney Water prior to the emptying of any pool to the sewer.

 

5.       Lighting from the swimming pool and other communal facilities shall not detrimentally impact the amenity of other premises and adjacent dwellings.

 

Reason:    Health and amenity

 

 

 

 

 

Jonathan Goodwill

Executive Assessment Officer

 

 

 

 

Shaun Garland

Team Leader Development Assessment South

 

 

 

 

Corrie Swanepoel

Manager Development Assessment Services

 

 

 

 

Michael Miocic

Director Development & Regulation

 

 

Attachments:

A1View

Plans and elevations

 

2014/065854

 

A2View

Location Sketch

 

2014/065858

 

A3View

Zoning Extract

 

2014/065861

 

A4View

SEPP 1 Objection

 

2014/065864

 

A5View

Planning Circular PS08-014

 

2012/287313

  


APPENDIX No: 1 - Plans and elevations

 

Item No: GB.6

 


 


 


 


 


 


APPENDIX No: 2 - Location Sketch

 

Item No: GB.6

 


APPENDIX No: 3 - Zoning Extract

 

Item No: GB.6

 


APPENDIX No: 4 - SEPP 1 Objection

 

Item No: GB.6

 


 


 


 


 


APPENDIX No: 5 - Planning Circular PS08-014

 

Item No: GB.6

 


 


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 29 April 2014

GB.7 / 332

 

 

Item GB.7

S09119

 

1 April 2014

 

 

Sustainable Event Management Policy

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

purpose of report:

To seek endorsement of Council’s revised Sustainable Event Management Policy, Sustainable Event Management Plan and Sustainable Event Management Checklist.

 

 

background:

In June 2011 a draft Sustainable Event Management Policy was adopted by Council for consultation, as part of Council’s commitment under the Waste and Sustainability Improvement Payment (WaSIP) program, to formalise Council’s sustainable event management practices.

 

 

comments:

Since the adoption of the draft Sustainable Event Management Policy, a number of developments have occurred, including: extensive internal and external stakeholder consultation on the draft Policy; a broadening of scope in the Policy; the development of a Sustainable Event Management Plan, Sustainable Event Management Checklist and Sustainable Event Management Resource Guide to accompany the Policy; and the incorporation of mandatory requirements in the Policy. 

 

 

recommendation:

That Council adopts the revised Sustainable Event Management Policy, Sustainable Event Management Plan and Sustainable Event Management Checklist.

 

 

 


  

Purpose of Report

 

To seek endorsement of Council’s revised Sustainable Event Management Policy, Sustainable Event Management Plan and Sustainable Event Management Checklist.  

 

Background

 

Council has been incorporating a range of sustainability principles into the running of its community events for a number of years. In June 2011 a draft Sustainable Event Management Policy was adopted by Council for consultation, as part of Council’s commitment under the Waste and Sustainability Improvement Payment (WaSIP) program, to formalise Council’s sustainable event management practices. Since the WaSIP program transitioned to the Waste Less Recycle More program in 2012 sustainable event management has continued as part of Council’s corporate sustainability program.

 

Comments

 

Ku-ring-gai Council and external event organisers deliver a range of large and smaller scale events in the Ku-ring-gai Local Government Area (LGA), including festivals, concerts, fetes and fairs, sporting gala days, citizenship ceremonies and public seminars and workshops, which may include the provision of goods and services, food and beverages, presentations and/or demonstrations, entertainment and stalls.

 

Council’s draft Sustainable Event Management Policy identified three major delivery areas, namely: (i) Council run community events; (ii) sustainable facility management; and (iii) internal meetings and events. The draft Policy was developed to address the first delivery area and aimed to incorporate a range of sustainable principles to minimise waste, maximise recycling, reduce energy and water consumption, conserve biodiversity and mitigate the impacts of climate change.

 

Since the adoption of the draft Sustainable Event Management Policy, a number of developments have occurred:

 

·        The sustainability principles in the draft Policy have been adhered to for Council-run community events;

·        Extensive internal and external stakeholder consultation has occurred on the draft Policy;

·        The Policy has broadened in scope to include: (i) major and minor events held on land/in facilities managed by Council, including those organised by Council and those organised by external organisations; and (ii) internal Council events;

·        A Sustainable Event Management Plan (for major and minor events) and a Sustainable Event Management Checklist (for internal Council events) have been developed to accompany the Policy;

·        A Sustainable Event Management Resource Guide has been developed to accompany the Policy;

·        Mandatory requirements have been incorporated into the Policy for both major and minor events and internal Council events.

 

As a result, endorsement of the revised Sustainability Event Management Policy (Attachment A1) and supporting documents, being the Sustainable Event Management Plan and Sustainable Event Management Checklist (Attachments A2 and A3), is sought.

 

integrated planning and reporting

 

Leadership and Governance

 

Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective

Delivery Program

Term Achievement

Operational Plan

Task

The organisation is recognised and distinguished by its ethical decision-making, efficient management, innovation and quality customer service.

Council’s governance framework is developed to ensure probity, transparency and the principles of sustainability are integrated and applied into our policies, plans, guidelines and decision-making processes.

 

Participate in policy review opportunities to implement the principles of sustainability.

 

 

The organisation is recognised as a leader in sustainability

Review Council’s Corporate Sustainability Action Plan and implement a corporate sustainability program

 

Governance Matters

 

The development of this Policy has taken into account the requirements of the following legislative documents:

 

·        Waste Avoidance and Resource Recovery Act 2001;

·        Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997;

·        Local Government Act 1993.

 

A Sustainable Event Management Plan, provided by Council and demonstrating compliance to the Policy, must be completed and submitted for:

 

•        A Major Event organised by Council;

•        A Major Event organised by an external organisation;

•        A Minor Event organised by Council.

 

The Sustainable Event Management Plan must be submitted to Council’s events booking team by the event organiser as part of the event booking. Bookings will not be approved by Council without the submission of a satisfactory Sustainable Event Management Plan.

 

A Sustainable Event Management Checklist, provided by Council, will be available to all Council staff organising Internal Council Events and should be utilised to ensure compliance to the Policy.

 

Council’s Manager Environment and Sustainability will be responsible for reviewing and reporting on this Policy, and for overseeing compliance of this Policy, where practicable. Council’s Sustainability Officer will be responsible for monitoring compliance of this Policy by internal and external event organisers, through established monitoring and evaluation procedures, where practicable.

 

This Policy will be made available as a public document and will be communicated to external event organisers through the event booking process and via Council’s website. This Policy will be communicated to all internal staff, with briefing/training sessions and supporting resources provided to assist in the implementation of this Policy.

 

Risk Management

 

The risks in relation to this policy include the reputational risk from a failure to meet the requirements of the Policy and potential limitations in available technologies/goods/services to enable the objectives of this Policy to be met. Sustainable event management practices will be integrated into Council’s event risk management processes.

 

Financial Considerations

 

The financial implications of the implementation of this Policy will not be significant and are largely related to potential cost increases from procuring more sustainable goods and services. Cost competitiveness will be sought, however, through the procurement process.

 

Social Considerations

 

Through this Policy, Council is committed to ensuring that the planning, management, delivery and evaluation of events:

 

·        Is inclusive of the broader community and contributes to the diversity and cohesiveness of the Ku-ring-gai community;

·        Respects and publicly acknowledges local indigenous heritage and traditions;

·        Applies sustainable and ethical purchasing principles for the procurement of goods and services for events.

 

Environmental Considerations

 

Through this Policy, Council is committed to ensuring that the planning, management, delivery and evaluation of events:

 

·        Minimises impacts on the environment, including biodiversity and natural resources;

·        Implements efficiency measures to minimise energy and water consumption and greenhouse gas emissions;

·        Implements waste avoidance and minimisation strategies and maximises resource recovery for events;

·        Encourages the use of sustainable transport to and from events.

 

The implementation of this Policy demonstrates Council’s commitment to sustainability and environmental leadership.

 

 

Community Consultation

 

Consultation was undertaken with external event organisers and stallholders who use Council facilities for events, or participate in Council run events, via surveys and phone interviews. The consultation identified existing sustainable event management practices by these event organisers and stallholders and their attitude to sustainable event management in general. The consultation revealed that respondents have very little experience with many of the emerging sustainable event management practices. It also revealed that while some respondents viewed a sustainable event management policy as a positive development, others were apprehensive of being asked to comply with additional requirements.

 

Based on these consultation outcomes it was decided that the following approach would support external event organisers and stallholders transition to improved practices over time: a staged policy implementation approach; the incremental introduction of mandatory requirements for external event organisers (that is, for non-Council run events) over time; an internal review of all submitted sustainable event management plans to monitor which event practices are considered challenging to implement, so that capacity building activities can be targeted accordingly; and the provision of a Sustainable Event Management Resource Guide, to facilitate uptake and compliance with the Policy.

 

Internal Consultation

 

An internal working group was formed with representatives from across Council who are responsible for organising both large and small events, to review and progress the draft Policy and supporting documentation, and the Policy implementation processes. The working group met regularly over several months. Consultation with the working group identified sustainable event management practices currently implemented at Council run (major, minor and internal) events and opportunities for improvements. The working group also formulated the mandatory inclusions for Council run (major and minor) events and internal Council events which accompany the Policy.

 

Internal consultation also identified the need for improved internal procurement processes to support the implementation of the Policy, specifically the procurement of sustainable goods and services. This is being addressed in consultation with the Manager Procurement and Contracts.

 

In addition, a briefing was provided to GMD by the Manager Environment and Sustainability on the contents of the reviewed Policy, including the mandatory requirements in the Policy, and the proposed implementation processes to ensure uptake and compliance with the Policy. GMD endorsed the mandatory requirements during this briefing, with minor amendments, which have been incorporated into the supporting policy documents.

 

Summary

 

In June 2011 a draft Sustainable Event Management Policy was adopted by Council for consultation, as part of Council’s commitment under the Waste and Sustainability Improvement Payment (WaSIP) program, to formalise Council’s sustainable event management practices.

 

Since the adoption of the draft Sustainable Event Management Policy, however, a number of developments have occurred:

 

·        The sustainability principles in the draft Policy have been adhered to for Council-run community events;

·        Extensive internal and external stakeholder consultation has occurred on the draft Policy;

·        The Policy has broadened in scope to include: (i) major and minor events held on land/in facilities managed by Council, including those organised by Council and those organised by external organisations; and (ii) internal Council events;

·        A Sustainable Event Management Plan (for major and minor events) and a Sustainable Event Management Checklist (for internal Council events) have been developed to accompany the Policy;

·        A Sustainable Event Management Resource Guide has been developed to accompany the Policy;

·        Mandatory requirements have been incorporated into the Policy for both major and minor events and internal Council events.

 

As a result, endorsement of the revised Sustainability Event Management Policy (Attachment A1) and supporting documents, being the Sustainable Event Management Plan and Sustainable Event Management Checklist (Attachments A2 and A3), is sought.

 

Recommendation:

 

A.       That Council adopts the revised Sustainable Event Management Policy, Sustainable Event Management Plan and Sustainable Event Management Checklist.

 

B.       That a copy of the Sustainable Event Management Policy and supporting documentation is placed on Council's website and communicated to internal and external event organisers through the event booking process.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Peter Vun

Sustainability Planner

 

 

 

 

Marnie Kikken

Manager Environment & Sustainability

 

 

 

 

Antony Fabbro

Acting Director Strategy & Environment

 

 

 

Attachments:

A1View

Sustainable Event Management Policy

 

2014/091999

 

A2View

Sustainable Event Management Plan

 

2014/092004

 

A3View

Sustainable Event Management Checklist

 

2014/092009

  


APPENDIX No: 1 - Sustainable Event Management Policy

 

Item No: GB.7

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


APPENDIX No: 2 - Sustainable Event Management Plan

 

Item No: GB.7

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


APPENDIX No: 3 - Sustainable Event Management Checklist

 

Item No: GB.7

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator