Ordinary Meeting of Council
TO BE HELD ON Tuesday, 23 May 2017 AT 7:00 pm
Level 3, Council Chamber
Agenda
** ** ** ** ** **
NOTE: For Full Details, See Council’s Website –
www.kmc.nsw.gov.au under the link to business papers
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
Confirmation of Reports to be Considered in Closed Meeting
NOTE:
That in accordance with the provisions of Section 10 of the Local Government Act 1993, all officers’ reports be released to the press and public, with the exception of confidential attachments to the following General Business reports:
GB.10 Ku-ring-gai Fitness and Aquatic Centre Solar Power Tender - RFT 03-2017
Attachment A1: RFT 03-2017 Weighted scoring summary
In accordance with 10A2(c)
Attachment A2: Signed evaluation form-KFAC Solar
In accordance with 10A2(c)
Attachment A3: RFT 03-2017 List of Tenderers for KFAC Solar PV
In accordance with 10A2(c)
That in accordance with the provisions of Section 10 of the Local Government Act 1993, all officers’ reports be released to the press and public, with the exception of confidential attachments to the following Confidential reports:
C.1 Lindfield Community Hub - Legal Advice for Procurement and Delivery Options
Attachment A1 HDY Legal advice
Attachment A2 Supplementary legal advice
In accordance with 10A2(c)
Address the Council
NOTE: Persons who address the Council should be aware that their address will be tape recorded.
Documents Circulated to Councillors
CONFIRMATION OF MINUTEs
Minutes of Ordinary Meeting of Council 8
File: S02131
Meeting held 2 May 2017
Minutes numbered 100 to 99
minutes from the Mayor
Petitions
GENERAL BUSINESS
i. The Mayor to invite Councillors to nominate any item(s) on the Agenda that they wish to have a site inspection.
ii. The Mayor to invite Councillors to nominate any item(s) on the Agenda that they wish to adopt in accordance with the officer’s recommendation allowing for minor changes without debate.
GB.1 Investment Report as at 30 April 2017 88
File: S05273
To present Council’s investment portfolio performance for April 2017.
Recommendation:
That the summary of investments performance for April 2017 be received and noted; and that the Certificate of the Responsible Accounting Officer be noted and report adopted.
GB.2 Analysis of Land and Environment Court Costs - 3rd Quarter 2016 to 2017 97
File: S05273
To report legal costs in relation to development control matters in the Land and Environment Court for the quarter ended 31 March 2017.
Recommendation:
That the analysis of Land and Environment Court costs for the quarter ended 31 March 2017 be received and noted.
GB.3 2016 - 2017 Budget Review - 3rd Quarter ended March 2017 115
File: S09112/6
To inform Council of the results of the 3rd quarter budget review of 2016/17 and seek approval to adjust the annual budget based on the actual financial performance and trend for the period 1 July 2016 to 31 March 2017.
Recommendation:
That Council receive and note the March 2017 Quarterly Budget Review and that the recommended changes to the 2016/17 budget be adopted.
GB.4 Draft Related Party Disclosures Policy 150
File: FY00592
To present to Council the Draft Related Party Disclosures Policy
Recommendation:
That the Draft Related Party Disclosures Policy be adopted by Council
GB.5 Invitation to the 2017 Child Protection Foundation Masquerade Ball 178
File: CY00043/9
To inform Councillors of an invitation from the Child Protection Foundation to attend the 2017 Black Tie Masquerade Ball, being held on Friday 7 July 2017 in the Chateau Reale Lounge at the Doltone House function centre, 223 Belgrave Esplanade, Sylvania Waters.
Recommendation:
That Council consider the invitation to purchase tickets for those Councillors wishing to attend the 2017 Child Protection Foundation Black Tie Masquerade Ball.
GB.6 12 Killeaton Street, St Ives - Torrens title subdivision of one lot into two, access driveway and associated subdivision works 183
File: DA0500/16
Ward: St Ives
Applicant: Chase Burke and Harvey Surveyors
Owner: Mr X Xu
Torrens title subdivision of one lot into two, access driveway and associated subdivision works
Recommendation:
Approval
GB.7 Consideration of Submissions - Planning Proposal to amend the KLEP 2015 for the rezoning of 21 Lorne Avenue, Killara 335
File: S11257
For Council to consider the submissions received in response to the exhibition of the Planning Proposal to amend to the KLEP 2015 for the rezoning of 21 Lorne Avenue, Killara.
Recommendation:
That Council adopts the Planning Proposal and makes the plan under delegation.
GB.8 Update Report on the Development Contributions System 451
File: S06785/3
The purpose of this report is to provide Council with an overview of key activities and highlights in the development contributions system over the past six months and anticipated actions and highlights for the coming twelve months.
Recommendation:
That the information in the report be received and noted.
GB.9 Cities Power Partnership 471
File: S09069/7
To seek endorsement for Council to join the Cities Power Partnership, soon to be launched by the Climate Council.
Recommendation:
That endorsement is provided for Council to join the Cities Power Partnership, soon to be launched by the Climate Council.
GB.10 Ku-ring-gai Fitness and Aquatic Centre Solar Power Tender - RFT 03-2017 496
File: S11318
To consider the tenders received for the installation of a Solar power system at the Ku-ring-gai Fitness and Aquatic Centre (KFAC) and appoint the preferred tenderer.
Recommendation:
In accordance with Section 55 of the Local Government Act and Tender Regulations, it is recommended Council accept the tender submitted by tenderer ‘A’ as identified in the Confidential Weighted Scoring Summary (Attachment 1).
GB.11 Roads & Maritime Funded Project Proposed additional car parking Old School Car Park, St Ives 501
File: TM3/09
To seek Council’s acceptance to the Roads & Maritime Services (RMS) grant for the reconfiguration and resurfacing of the Old School Car Park at St Ives.
Recommendation:
That Council advise the RMS of its acceptance of the grant for the resurfacing and reconfiguration of the Old School car park and arrange for the work to be completed by 30 June 2017.
GB.12 Road Naming - Roxy Place 514
File: S03211
To report on the proposal to name a new road in Lindfield, “Roxy Place”.
Recommendation:
That the Council adopt the name for the new road as ”Roxy Place” and notices be published in a local newspaper and the NSW Government Gazette.
Extra Reports Circulated to Meeting
Motions of which due Notice has been given
NM.1 DA0346/16 Childcare Centre 24 Bayswater Road Lindfield 518
File: DA0346/16
Current Land and Environment Court proceedings case number 2016/00309535 between Omid Mohebati-Arani as applicant and Ku-ring-gai Council as respondent.
The universal community opposition to the child-care centre application at 24 Bayswater Road resulted in 212 community objections to the original DA and 134 to the amended DA. Also, the 100 members of the Loyal Henry Community Association Inc, and over 250 local residents on the association’s mailing list, reject this development as inappropriately located and in breach of council controls.
The initial document (called a SOFAC) filed by the Council in the Land and Environment Court, detailed 9 contentions that the DA should be refused. An important contention was that the development is "contrary to the public interest” based on 7 issues from the community submissions.
Although there were the same and additional objections to the amended DA, the council has excluded public interest from its amended SOFAC. Because this document sets the agenda for the court case, issues not raised in it may not be considered.
Having taking regard to the following matters,
a) the wide community interest in this application, as evidenced by the number of opposing community submissions received by the Council in response to the original application and the amended application,
b) a public interest contention reflecting these community submissions having been included in the original court documents (SOFAC) filed by the Council in response to the original application,
c) the absence of a public interest contention in the amended SOFAC filed by the Council in response to the amended application,
d) such absence not being accounted for or explained to the community, despite their repeated requests for a meeting or explanation and
e) a public interest contention invariably being included in Council SOFAC’s prepared in similar circumstances to this one.
I move:
That council officers be directed to instruct the external solicitors, engaged by Council in these proceedings, to further amend the court document (SOFAC) filed by Council to include a public interest contention, reflecting and particularising the community submissions received by the Council.
NM.2 Council Website Home Page Link Public Exhibition 520
File: S11182
Notice of Motion from Councillor Berlioz dated 15 May 2017
Last week an Exhibition tab with direct link to proposals and documents on Public Exhibition was displayed on Council’s home webpage.
This ensures that matters on exhibition are clearly visible to users and not embedded in the website.
To ensure this becomes council policy or practice, I move that:
A specific Exhibition tab with a direct link to all proposals and documents on Public Exhibition must be visible on Council’s home page Navigation Menu, and that the Media and Communications Policy be amended to incorporate this.
BUSINESS WITHOUT NOTICE – SUBJECT TO CLAUSE 241 OF GENERAL REGULATIONS
Questions Without Notice
Inspections Committee – SETTING OF TIME, DATE AND RENDEZVOUS
Confidential Business to be dealt with in Closed Meeting
C.1 Lindfield Community Hub - Legal Advice for Procurement and Delivery Options
File: S10973
In accordance with the Local Government Act 1993 and the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005, in the opinion of the General Manager, the following business is of a kind as referred to in section 10A(2)(c), of the Act, and should be dealt with in a part of the meeting closed to the public.
Section 10A(2)(c) of the Act permits the meeting to be closed to the public in respect of information that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business.
The matter is classified confidential because it deals with the proposed acquisition and/or disposal of property.
It is not in the public interest to release this information as it would prejudice Council’s ability to acquire and/or dispose of the property on appropriate terms and conditions.
Report by Director Strategy & Environment dated 11 May 2017
John McKee
General Manager
** ** ** ** ** **
Minute Ku-ring-gai Council Page
MINUTES
OF Ordinary Meeting of Council
HELD ON Tuesday, 2 May 2017
Present: |
The Mayor, Councillor J Anderson (Chairperson) Councillors E Malicki & J Pettett (Comenarra Ward) Councillors C Szatow & D Citer (Gordon Ward) Councillors C Berlioz & D Ossip (St Ives Ward) Councillors C Fornari-Orsmond & D McDonald (Wahroonga Ward) |
|
|
Staff Present: |
General Manager (John McKee) Director Corporate (David Marshall) Director Development & Regulation (Michael Miocic) Director Operations (Greg Piconi) Director Strategy & Environment (Andrew Watson) Director Community (Janice Bevan) Corporate Lawyer (Jamie Taylor) Manager Corporate Communications (Virginia Leafe) Manager Urban & Heritage Planning (Antony Fabbro) Manager Finance (Angela Apostol) Manager Integrated Planning, Property & Assets (Deborah Silva) Manager Records and Governance (Amber Moloney) Team Leader Urban Planning (Craige Wyse) Minutes Secretary (Christine Dunand) |
The Meeting commenced at 7:00 pm
The Mayor offered the Prayer
87 |
Apologies
File: S02194
|
|
Councillor David Armstrong tendered an apology for non-attendance (medical reasons) and requested leave of absence.
Councillor David Ossip advised he will be late for the meeting.
|
|
Resolved:
(Moved: Councillors Fornari-Orsmond/Berlioz)
That the apologies from Councillors Armstrong and Councillor Ossip be accepted and leave of absence granted.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY |
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
The Mayor adverted to the necessity for Councillors and staff to declare a Pecuniary Interest/Conflict of Interest in any item on the Business Paper.
Councillor Fornari-Orsmond declared a significant pecuniary interest in item
GB.6 Consideration of Submissions - Planning Proposal for Areas Deferred from the KLEP 2015 as she lives in one of the areas and advised she would not participate in the debate.
Address the Council
The following members of the public addressed Council on items not on the agenda:
M Davey Bushlands Avenue
D Castle Bayswater Road DA
R Cuschieri Bayswater Road DA
DOCUMENTS CIRCULATED TO COUNCILLORS
The Mayor adverted to the documents circulated in the Councillors’ papers and advised that the following matters would be dealt with at the appropriate time during the meeting:
Councillor Agenda Information: |
GB.6 Consideration of Submissions - Planning Proposal for Areas Deferred from the KLEP 2015 Memorandum from Director Strategy & Environment dated 2 May 2017 advising Area 5 incorrectly titled ‘Jordan Avenue’ should read ‘Jordan Road’. |
Councillors Information: |
Minute Number 86 OMC 4 April 2017 – Requesting the Removal of a Netting Fence Surrounding Sheldon Forest Memorandum from Director Operations dated 18 April 2017 in response a Question without Notice from Councillor Malicki. |
CONFIRMATION OF MINUTEs
88 |
Minutes of Ordinary Meeting of Council File: S02131
|
|
Meeting held 4 April 2017 Minutes numbered 72 to 86
|
|
Resolved:
(Moved: Councillors McDonald/Szatow)
That Minutes numbered 72 to 86 circulated to Councillors were taken as read and confirmed as an accurate record of the proceedings of the Meeting.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY |
PETITIONS
89 |
Petition Regarding Lapwing Reserve, Carcoola Road St Ives - Proposal for the Erection of a Shade Structure (Thirty Eight [38] Signatures)
File: S05624 Vide: PT.1
|
|
“We, the undersigned, request council’s collaborative approach to the implementation of the playground and associated structures in this reserve continues, and that the local residents are engaged to provide input into any further construction to be carried out on site.”(Thirty Eight [38] Signatures).
We are writing to request that Council continues the strong engagement with local residents regarding the recently opened Lapwing Reserve in Carcoola Rd, St Ives. Council and the local residents have been working together for more than 20 years to enable this public open space to be conserved and then developed for the entire community to enjoy and we are very appreciative of the support we have received from everyone involved at the council throughout this time.
We, the undersigned, request council’s collaborative approach to the implementation of the playground and associated structures in this reserve continues, and that the local residents are engaged to provide input into any further construction to be carried out on site.
We had firstly been made aware via Council’s Facebook page, and subsequently through discussions with Alison Walker, Principle Landscape Architect, that there are plans for further construction to provide shade to users of the park’s slides. After seeking further details on the proposed shade structure, council has provided sail installation schematics drawings and notification of work.
We note that there was no shade structure included in the concept design for this playground when it was approved by Council. We further note that whilst a very early design noted a shade (2014 version), the residents concept plan feedback (18th Jan 2015) listing adjustments/improvements requests to the design, signed by 27 residents, has not included the removal of the shades. The removal of the shades was not triggered by the residents, at any time.
Without any scale or dimensions, it is very difficult for the residents to provide feedback on the impact of this structure to the amenity of local neighbours. Without this perspective, the sail schematic appears to show coverage over much of the new playground area which over-delivers against the concerns raised by the few users of the park who posted feedback over lack of shade over the slide.
The sail coverage appears to be well beyond the Mayor’s declaration during the park inauguration as she was standing at the top of the two metal slides that “we are planning to install sunshade over these two slides in the next few weeks”.
We submit that the erection of a significant structure over the playground will have a direct impact on the streetscape and the amenity of local neighbours, given the Reserve’s setting amongst private houses.
We are supportive of the provision of shade directly and immediately above the slides during the hottest part of the day only. We would like to work with council to ensure the needs of the park users and local residents are met.
|
|
Resolved:
(Moved: Councillors Berlioz/Fornari-Orsmond)
That the petition be received and referred to the appropriate Officer of Council for attention.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY |
GENERAL BUSINESS
90 |
Revised Delivery Program 2013 - 2017 and Draft Operational Plan 2017 - 2018
File: FY00382/9 Vide: GB.1
|
|
To place Council's revised Delivery Program 2013-2017 and draft Operational Plan 2017-2018, incorporating the Budget, Capital Works Program, Statement of Revenue Policy and Fees and Charges for 2017-2018, on public exhibition.
|
|
Resolved:
(Moved: Councillors McDonald/Fornari-Orsmond)
A. That the revised Delivery Program 2013-2017 and draft Operational Plan 2017-2018, incorporating the Budget, Capital Works Program, Statement of Revenue Policy and Fees and Charges for 2017-2018, be endorsed and placed on public exhibition for a period of twenty-eight (28) days.
B. That following public exhibition, a further report is submitted to Council to consider any submissions, to adopt the revised Delivery Program 2013-2017 and Operational Plan 2017-2018 including Fees and Charges 2017–2018.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY |
91 |
Investment Report as at 31 March 2017
File: S05273 Vide: GB.2
|
|
To present Council’s investment portfolio performance for March 2017.
|
|
Resolved:
(Moved: Councillors McDonald/Pettett)
A. That the summary of investments and performance for March 2017 be received and noted.
B. That the Certificate of the Responsible Accounting Officer be noted and the report adopted.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY |
92 |
Audit and Risk Committee Membership
File: CY00458/5 Vide: GB.3
|
|
At the Council meeting of the 4 April 2017, Council resolved to extend the tenure of the current Independent members; Mr John Gordon and Mr John Bartrop for a 12 month period. The purpose of this report is to amend this extension of the tenure to two years.
|
|
Resolved:
(Moved: Councillors McDonald/Szatow)
That Council extends the tenure of the current Independent members; Mr John Gordon and Mr John Bartrop for a further 12 month period to a total extension of 2 years.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY |
93 |
9 to 15 Cherry Street, Warrawee- Demolition of existing structures and construction of multi dwelling housing development comprising 27 townhouses, basement parking, associated landscaping and site consolidation
File: DA0019/16 Vide: GB.5
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The demolition of three dwellings, construction of a multi dwelling housing development comprising 27 townhouses and including basement parking, landscaping and the consolidation of three lots into one
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Resolved:
(Moved: Councillors McDonald/Fornari-Orsmond)
A. THAT Council, as the consent authority, is of the opinion that the variation request submitted under Clause 4.6 of Ku-ring-gai LEP (Local Centres) 2012 to vary the minimum street frontage development standard has met the requirements of clause 4.6(4) of the Ku-ring-gai LEP (Local Centres) 2012. Council is also of the opinion that strict compliance with the development standard is unreasonable and unnecessary in the circumstances of the case and that there are sufficient environmental planning grounds to justify the variation to the development standard.
AND
B. THAT Council, as the consent authority, grant development consent to DA0019/16 for the demolition of three dwellings, construction of a multi dwelling development comprising 27 townhouses, including basement parking, landscaping and the consolidation of three lots into one on land at 9-15 Cherry Street, Warrawee, subject to conditions. Pursuant to Section 95(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, this consent lapses if the approved works are not physically commenced within two years of the date of the Notice of Determination.
The conditions of consent are as follows:
Conditions that identify approved plans:
1. Approved architectural plans and documentation (new development)
The development must be carried out in accordance with the following plans and documentation listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, except where amended by other conditions of this consent:
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
Conditions to be satisfied prior to demolition, excavation or construction:
2. Asbestos works
All work involving asbestos products and materials, including asbestos-cement-sheeting (ie. Fibro), must be carried out in accordance with the guidelines for asbestos work published by WorkCover Authority of NSW.
Reason: To ensure public safety
3. Notice of commencement
At least 48 hours prior to the commencement of any development (including demolition, excavation, shoring or underpinning works), a notice of commencement of building or subdivision work form and appointment of the principal certifying authority form shall be submitted to Council.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
4. Notification of builder’s details
Prior to the commencement of any development or excavation works, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be notified in writing of the name and contractor licence number of the owner/builder intending to carry out the approved works.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
5. Dilapidation survey and report (public infrastructure)
Prior to the commencement of any development or excavation works on site, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a dilapidation report on the visible and structural condition of all structures of the following public infrastructure, has been completed and submitted to Council:
Public infrastructure
· Full road pavement width, including kerb and gutter, of Cherry Street over the site frontage. · All driveway crossings and laybacks opposite the subject site.
The report must be completed by a consulting structural/civil engineer. Particular attention must be paid to accurately recording (both written and photographic) existing damaged areas on the aforementioned infrastructure so that Council is fully informed when assessing any damage to public infrastructure caused as a result of the development.
The developer may be held liable to any recent damage to public infrastructure in the vicinity of the site, where such damage is not accurately recorded by the requirements of this condition prior to the commencement of works.
Note: A written acknowledgment from Council must be obtained (attesting to this condition being appropriately satisfied) and submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the commencement of any excavation works.
Reason: To record the structural condition of public infrastructure before works commence.
6. Archival recording of buildings
Prior to the commencement of any development or excavation works on site, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that an archival report has been submitted to Council’s Heritage Advisor.
The report must consist of an archival standard photographic record of the building (internally and externally), its garden and views of it from the street illustrating its relationship to neighbouring properties and the streetscape. Recording shall be undertaken in accordance with the guidelines for “Photographic Recording of Heritage Items Using Film or Digital Capture (2006)” prepared by the New South Wales Heritage Office.
Information shall be bound in an A4 report format. It shall include copies of photographs, referenced to plans of the site. Two (2) copies (one (1) copy to include negatives or CD of images shall be submitted to Council's Heritage Advisor. The recording document will be held in the local studies collection of Ku-ring-gai Library, the local historical society and Council’s files.
Note: A written acknowledgment from Council must be obtained (attesting to this condition being appropriately satisfied) and submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the commencement of any works.
Reason: To ensure the proper management of historical artefacts and to ensure their preservation.
7. Dilapidation survey and report (private property)
Prior to the commencement of any demolition or excavation works on site, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a dilapidation report on the visible and structural condition of all structures upon the following lands, has been completed and submitted to Council:
The dilapidation report must include a photographic survey of adjoining properties detailing their physical condition, both internally and externally, including such items as walls ceilings, roof and structural members. The report must be completed by a consulting structural/geotechnical engineer as determined necessary by that professional based on the excavations for the proposal and the recommendations of the submitted geotechnical report.
In the event that access for undertaking the dilapidation survey is denied by a property owner, the applicant must demonstrate in writing to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority that all reasonable steps have been taken to obtain access and advise the affected property owner of the reason for the survey and that these steps have failed.
Note: A copy of the dilapidation report is to be provided to Council prior to any excavation works been undertaken. The dilapidation report is for record keeping purposes only and may be used by an applicant or affected property owner to assist in any civil action required to resolve any dispute over damage to adjoining properties arising from works.
Reason: To record the structural condition of likely affected properties before works commence.
8. Construction and traffic management plan
The applicant must submit to Council a Construction Traffic Management Plan (TMP), which is to be approved prior to the commencement of any works on site.
The plan is to consist of a report with Traffic Control Plans attached.
The report is to contain commitments which must be followed by the demolition and excavation contractor, builder, owner and subcontractors. The TMP applies to all persons associated with demolition, excavation and construction of the development.
The report is to contain construction vehicle routes for approach and departure to and from all directions.
The report is to contain a site plan showing entry and exit points. Swept paths are to be shown on the site plan showing access and egress for a 12.5 metre long heavy rigid vehicle and if required for demolition and excavation stages a 19.0 metre long articulated vehicle are to be shown.
The Traffic Control Plans are to be prepared by a qualified person (red card holder). One must be provided for each of the following stages of the works:
· demolition · excavation · concrete pour · construction of vehicular crossing and reinstatement of footpath · traffic control for vehicles reversing into or out of the site · pedestrian safety measures to be shown.
Traffic controllers must be in place at the site entry and exit points to control heavy vehicle movements in order to maintain the safety of pedestrians and other road users.
When a satisfactory TMP is received, a letter of approval will be issued with conditions attached. Traffic management at the site must comply with the approved TMP as well as any conditions in the letter issued by Council. Council’s Rangers will be patrolling the site regularly and fines will be issued for any non-compliance with this condition.
Reason: To ensure that appropriate measures have been considered during all phases of the construction process in a manner that maintains the environmental amenity and ensures the ongoing safety and protection of people.
9. Work zone
A works zone shall be provided along the site frontage to the dead end of Cherry Street. The applicant must make a written application to the Ku-ring-gai Local Traffic Committee to install the work zone. Work zones are provided specifically for the set down and pick up of materials and not for the parking of private vehicles associated with the site. Work zones will generally not be approved where there is sufficient space on-site for the setting down and picking up of goods being taken to or from a construction site.
If the work zone is approved by the Local Traffic Committee, the applicant must obtain a written copy of the related resolution from the Ku-ring-gai Local Traffic Committee and submit this to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to commencement of any works on site.
Where approval of the work zone is resolved by the Committee, the necessary work zone signage shall be installed (at the cost of the applicant) and the adopted fee paid prior to commencement of any works on site. At the expiration of the work zone approval, the applicant is required to remove the work zone signs and reinstate any previous signs at their expense.
In the event the work zone is required for a period beyond that initially approved by the Traffic Committee, the applicant shall make a payment to Council for the extended period in accordance with Council’s schedule of fees and charges for work zones prior to the extended period commencing.
Reason: To ensure that appropriate measures have been made for the operation of the site during the construction phase.
10. Sediment controls
Prior to any work commencing on site, sediment and erosion control measures shall be installed along the contour immediately downslope of any future disturbed areas.
The form of the sediment controls to be installed on the site shall be determined by reference to the Landcom manual ‘Managing Urban Stormwater: Soils and Construction’. The erosion controls shall be maintained in an operational condition until the development activities have been completed and the site fully stabilised. Sediment shall be removed from the sediment controls following each heavy or prolonged rainfall period.
Reason: To preserve and enhance the natural environment.
11. Tree protection fencing
To preserve the existing tree/s that are to be retained, no work shall commence until the area beneath their canopy is fenced off as shown on the following plan as amended by condition, to prevent any activities, storage or the disposal of materials within the fenced area. The fence/s shall be maintained intact until the completion of all demolition/building work on site.
The tree protection fencing shall be constructed of galvanised pipe at 2.4 metre spacings and connected by securely attached chain mesh fencing to a minimum height of 1.8 metres in height prior to work commencing.
Reason : To protect existing trees during construction phase.
12. Tree protection signage
Prior to works commencing, tree protection signage is to be attached to each tree protection zone, displayed in a prominent position and the sign repeated at 10 metres intervals or closer where the fence changes direction. Each sign shall contain in a clearly legible form, the following information:
Tree protection zone.
i) This fence has been installed to prevent damage to the trees and their growing environment both above and below ground and access is restricted. ii) Any encroachment not previously approved within the tree protection zone shall be the subject of an arborist's report. iii) The arborist's report shall provide proof that no other alternative is available. iv) The Arborist's report shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority for further consultation with Council. v) The name, address, and telephone number of the developer.
Reason: To protect existing trees during the construction phase.
13. Tree fencing inspection
Upon installation of the required tree protection measures, an inspection of the site by the Principal Certifying Authority is required to verify that tree protection measures comply with all relevant conditions.
Reason: To protect existing trees during the construction phase.
14. Construction waste management plan
Prior to the commencement of any works, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a waste management plan, prepared by a suitably qualified person, has been prepared in accordance with Part 23 of the Ku-ring-gai Development Control Plan (Local Centres) 2016 (DCP).
The plan shall address all issues identified in the DCP, including but not limited to: the estimated volume of waste and method for disposal for the construction and operation phases of the development.
Note: The plan shall be provided to the Certifying Authority.
Reason: To ensure appropriate management of construction waste.
15. Noise and vibration management plan
Prior to the commencement of any works, a noise and vibration management plan is to be prepared by a suitably qualified expert addressing the likely noise and vibration from demolition, excavation and construction of the proposed development and provided to the Principal Certifying Authority. The management plan is to identify amelioration measures to achieve the best practice objectives of AS 2436-2010 and NSW Department of Environment and Climate Change Interim Construction Noise Guidelines. The report shall be prepared in consultation with any geotechnical report that itemises equipment to be used for excavation works.
The management plan shall address, but not be limited to, the following matters:
· identification of the specific activities that will be carried out and associated noise sources · identification of all potentially affected sensitive receivers, including residences, churches, commercial premises, schools and properties containing noise sensitive equipment · the construction noise objective specified in the conditions of this consent · the construction vibration criteria specified in the conditions of this consent · determination of appropriate noise and vibration objectives for each identified sensitive receiver · noise and vibration monitoring, reporting and response procedures · assessment of potential noise and vibration from the proposed demolition, excavation and construction activities, including noise from construction vehicles and any traffic diversions · description of specific mitigation treatments, management methods and procedures that will be implemented to control noise and vibration during construction · construction timetabling to minimise noise impacts including time and duration restrictions, respite periods and frequency · procedures for notifying residents of construction activities that are likely to affect their amenity through noise and vibration · contingency plans to be implemented in the event of non-compliances and/or noise complaints
Reason: To protect the amenity afforded to surrounding residents during the construction process.
Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of the construction certificate:
16. Amended architectural plans
Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the approved plans listed in Condition 1 above and endorsed with Council’s stamp, have been amended in accordance with the requirements of this condition as well as other conditions of this consent:
1. The small areas of courtyard at the front of Townhouses 17, 18, 19 and 20 and the rear of Townhouses 1-4, 8-11, 14-16, 21, 25-27 are to be deleted and replaced with soft landscaping.
2. The entrance path is to be set back approximately 2 metres from building line in front of Townhouses 5-7 as for Townhouses 1-4, allowing for a narrow planter bed along the fronts of the Townhouses similar to that provided for Townhouses 12 and 13. The southern extent of soft landscape area within the communal open space is to be enlarged as a result. An additional strip of common area planting is to be provided in front of private courtyard to Townhouses 11 and fronting the communal open space as shown to Townhouses 12 and 13.
3. The private courtyard fencing to Townhouses 25 and 26 is to be set back along the alignment of Townhouses 21-24. The path in front of these units is to be reduced to 1.2 metres width to allow for a 400mm width planter in front of the courtyard fencing incorporating low planting.
4. The proposed courtyards within the tree protection areas of Trees 8 and 9 are to be constructed in accordance with arborist recommendations, prepared by Elke Landscape Architect, dated 24/02/17 and Dwg Arb603/A, Elke, 24/02/17.
5. The entrance path is to continue on the same alignment in front of Townhouses 5-7 as for Townhouses 1-4, allowing for a narrow planter bed along the fronts of the units similar to that provided for Townhouses 12 and 13.
6. All solid masonry courtyard fencing facing the internal communal courtyard must be no higher than 1.2m.
7. An additional strip of common area planting is to be provided in front of private courtyard to Townhouses 11 and fronting the communal open space as shown to Townhouses 12 and 13.
8. The bike storage area is to be deleted from the front setback area within the tree protection zone of Tree 3. The entry arbor is to be restricted to the area of ‘feature entry granite paving’ as annotated on the landscape plans.
9. The basement plan is to indicate shoring instead of graded batters where existing trees are to be retained within the side setbacks.
10. A water outlet is to be provided to the primary private open space (balcony or terrace) of each Townhouse, the central communal open space and visitor car parking/car wash bay space.
11. Intercom access for visitors must be provided in a safe location within the driveway.
12. Air conditioning condenser units are to be relocated from Townhouse balconies and located in the basement.
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
17. Noise control measures
Prior to commencement of any works the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the recommended noise control measures as provided for in the Noise Acoustic Report prepared by Acoustica, dated July 2016 and listed in Condition 1 as submitted with this application and that the requirements of Section F Health and Amenity Clause F4.5 Ventilation of rooms of the Building Code of Australia are met.
Note: Plans, specifications and certifications of the proposed acoustic measures to achieve the recommendations of Noise Acoustic Report prepared by Acoustica are to be submitted for consideration and approval prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate:
Reason: To ensure adequate levels of health and amenity to the occupants of the building.
18. Consolidation of lots
Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, the applicant must consolidate the existing Torrens title lots which will form the development site. Evidence of lot consolidation, in the form of a plan registered with Land and Property Information, must be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to issue a Construction Certificate.
Reason: To ensure continuous structures will not be placed across separate titles.
19. Visitable dwellings
Plans demonstrating compliance with Council's visitable housing requirements contained within Part 23.1 of KDCP 2015 are to be submitted to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority, prior to issue of the Construction Certificate. A visitable dwelling is a dwelling that can be accessed by people who use wheelchairs in that there must be at least one accessible entry and accessible path of travel to the living area and to a toilet that is either accessible or visitable as defined by AS 4299.
At least 70% of dwellings within the development must be visitable.
Reason: To ensure that the minimum number of visitable dwellings is provided within the development.
20. Amendments to approved environmental site management plan
Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the approved environmental site management plans, listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, have been amended in accordance with the requirements of this condition as well as other conditions of this consent:
The above environmental site management plan(s) for Phase One and Phase Two shall be amended in the following ways:
1. The tree protection fencing to Tree 3 is exclude the area of the existing driveway that is to be used for the proposed construction access.
2. The tree protection fencing between Tree 3 and Tree 8 shall be extended to protect the existing Lilly Pilly hedge adjacent to the eastern / rail corridor boundary. Accordingly, the proposed turning circle, unloading and waste recycling areas are to be set back further from the eastern boundary to ensure the protection of the hedge that is shown to be retained on the landscape plan.
3. All trees are to be numbered in accordance with the approved Arboricultural Assessment prepared by Angophora Consulting Arborist dated 29/07/16.
Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the amended environmental site management plan has been submitted as required by this condition.
Note: An amended environmental site management plan shall be submitted to the Certifying Authority.
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
21. Amendments to approved landscape plan
Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the approved landscape plans, listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, have been amended in accordance with the requirements of this condition as well as other conditions of this consent:
The above landscape plan(s) shall be amended in the following ways:
1. The landscape plans are to be amended to be consistent with the approved architectural plans contained in Condition 1 of this consent.
2. Proposed filling to front setback in the vicinity of Townhouse 1 is not permitted and existing levels are to be retained.
3. Existing levels are to be shown to the side setbacks within the tree protection zone of all existing trees to be retained. An additional retaining wall is to be shown along the southern edge of the proposed access path within the tree protection zone of Tree 27 and the western edge of the access path within the tree protection zone of Tree 45-49.
4. The proposed Gleditsia in the approximate location of Tree 2 is to be substituted with a Jacaranda mimosifolia (Jacaranda).
5. The gravel area proposed in the front setback is to be replaced by turf.
6. The proposed planting of an Angophora between Trees 8 and 9 is to be relocated to the south-eastern corner of Townhouse 27, at least 8m from the building.
7. Proposed planting of 8 indigenous canopy planting is to include four (4)Syncarpia glomulifera (Turpentine).
8. The proposed planting of 7 Tristaniopsis laurina adjacent the existing Lilly Pilly hedge, located along the eastern boundary, is to be deleted.
9. The existing Lilly Pilly hedge located along the northeastern boundary is to be accurately located. The proposed lawn area and maintenance path along the north eastern boundary is to be located on site subject to required setback to existing Lilly Pilly hedge.
10. Proposed on slab planting over basement as indicated on the landscape plan is to provided sufficient soil depth for proposed planting.
11. The landscape plan is to demonstrate accessible grades have been provided to the communal open space from all units.
12. The mail box is to be of piered construction and not strip footing and the entry paving is to be constructed above grade.
Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the amended landscape plan has been submitted as required by this condition.
Note: An amended landscape plan shall be submitted to the Certifying Authority.
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
22. Long service levy
In accordance with Section 109F(i) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act a Construction Certificate shall not be issued until any long service levy payable under Section 34 of the Building and Construction Industry Long Service Payments Act 1986 (or where such levy is payable by instalments, the first instalment of the levy) has been paid. Council is authorised to accept payment. Where payment has been made elsewhere, proof of payment is to be provided to Council.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
23. Builder’s indemnity insurance
The applicant, builder, developer or person who does the work on this development, must arrange builder’s indemnity insurance and submit the certificate of insurance in accordance with the requirements of Part 6 of the Home Building Act 1989 to the Certifying Authority for endorsement of the plans accompanying the Construction Certificate.
It is the responsibility of the applicant, builder or developer to arrange the builder's indemnity insurance for residential building work over the value of $20,000. The builder's indemnity insurance does not apply to commercial or industrial building work or to residential work valued at less than $20,000, nor to work undertaken by persons holding an owner/builder's permit issued by the Department of Fair Trading (unless the owner/builder's property is sold within 7 years of the commencement of the work).
Reason: Statutory requirement.
24. Outdoor lighting
Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that all outdoor lighting will comply with AS/NZ1158.3: 1999 Pedestrian Area (Category P) Lighting and AS4282: 1997 Control of the Obtrusive Effects of Outdoor Lighting.
Note: Details demonstrating compliance with these requirements are to be submitted prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate.
Reason: To provide high quality external lighting for security without adverse affects on public amenity from excessive illumination levels.
25. Access for people with disabilities (residential)
Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that access for people with disabilities to and from and between the public domain, residential units and all common open space areas is provided. Consideration must be given to the means of dignified and equitable access.
Compliant access provisions for people with disabilities shall be clearly shown on the plans submitted with the Construction Certificate. All details shall be provided to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate. All details shall be prepared in consideration of the Disability Discrimination Act, and the relevant provisions of AS1428.1, AS1428.2, AS1428.4 and AS 1735.12.
Reason: To ensure the provision of equitable and dignified access for all people in accordance with disability discrimination legislation and relevant Australian Standards.
26. Adaptable units
Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the nominated adaptable units within the development application, [Townhouses 21,22 and 24) are designed as adaptable housing in accordance with the provisions of Australian Standard AS4299-1995: Adaptable Housing OR achieve a Platinum Level performance rating in accordance with the Livable Housing Guidelines.
Note: Evidence from an appropriately qualified professional demonstrating compliance with this control is to be submitted to and approved by the Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate.
Reason: Disabled access & amenity.
27. Excavation for services
Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that no proposed underground services (ie: water, sewerage, drainage, gas or other service) unless previously approved by conditions of consent, are located beneath the canopy of any tree protected under Council’s Tree Preservation Order, located on the subject allotment and adjoining allotments.
Note: A plan detailing the routes of these services and trees protected under the Tree Preservation Order shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority.
Reason: To ensure the protection of trees.
28. Noise from plant in residential zone
Where any form of mechanical ventilation equipment or other noise generating plant is proposed as part of the development, prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate the Certifying Authority, shall be satisfied that the operation of an individual piece of equipment or operation of equipment in combination will not exceed more than 5dB(A) above the background level during the day when measured at the site’s boundaries and shall not exceed the background level at night (10.00pm –6.00 am) when measured at the boundary of the site.
C1. Note: A certificate from an appropriately qualified acoustic engineer is to be submitted with the Construction Certificate, certifying that all mechanical ventilation equipment or other noise generating plant in isolation or in combination with other plant will comply with the above requirements.
Reason: To comply with best practice standards for residential acoustic amenity.
29. Location of plant (multi dwelling housing)
Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that all plant and equipment (including but not limited to air conditioning equipment) is located within the basement.
C1. Note: Architectural plans identifying the location of all plant and equipment shall be provided to the Certifying Authority.
Reason: To minimise impact on surrounding properties, improved visual appearance and amenity for locality.
30. Driveway crossing levels
Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, driveway and associated footpath levels for any new, reconstructed or extended sections of driveway crossings between the property boundary and road alignment must be obtained from Ku-ring-gai Council. Such levels are only able to be issued by Council under the Roads Act 1993. All footpath crossings, laybacks and driveways are to be constructed according to Council's specifications "Construction of Gutter Crossings and Footpath Crossings".
Specifications are issued with alignment levels after completing the necessary application form at Customer Services and payment of the assessment fee. When completing the request for driveway levels application from Council, the applicant must attach a copy of the relevant development application drawing which indicates the position and proposed level of the proposed driveway at the boundary alignment.
This development consent is for works wholly within the property. Development consent does not imply approval of footpath or driveway levels, materials or location within the road reserve, regardless of whether this information is shown on the development application plans. The grading of such footpaths or driveways outside the property shall comply with Council's standard requirements. The suitability of the grade of such paths or driveways inside the property is the sole responsibility of the applicant and the required alignment levels fixed by Council may impact upon these levels.
The construction of footpaths and driveways outside the property in materials other than those approved by Council is not permitted.
Reason: To provide suitable vehicular access without disruption to pedestrian and vehicular traffic.
31. Driveway grades - basement carparks
Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, longitudinal driveway sections are to be prepared by a qualified civil/traffic engineer and be submitted for to and approved by the Certifying Authority. These profiles are to be at 1:100 scale along both edges of the proposed driveway, starting from the centreline of the frontage street carriageway to the proposed basement floor level. The traffic engineer shall provide specific written certification on the plans that:
· vehicular access can be obtained using grades of 25% (1 in 4) maximum and · all changes in grade (transitions) comply with Australian Standard 2890.1 -“Off-street car parking” (refer clause 2.5.3) to prevent the scraping of the underside of vehicles
If a new driveway crossing is proposed, the longitudinal sections must incorporate the driveway crossing levels as issued by Council upon prior application.
Reason: To provide suitable vehicular access without disruption to pedestrian and vehicular traffic.
32. Basement car parking details
Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, certified parking layout plan(s) to scale showing all aspects of the vehicle access and accommodation arrangements must be submitted to and approved by the Certifying Authority. A qualified civil/traffic engineer must review the proposed vehicle access and accommodation layout and provide written certification on the plans that:
· all parking space dimensions, driveway and aisle widths, driveway grades, transitions, circulation ramps, blind aisle situations and other trafficked areas comply with Australian Standard 2890.1 - 2004 “Off-street car parking” · a clear height clearance of 2.6 metres (Volume C Part 23.7 of the Ku-rin-gai Local Centres DCP for waste collection trucks) is provided over the designated garbage collection truck manoeuvring areas within the basement · no doors or gates are provided in the access driveways to the basement carpark which would prevent unrestricted access for internal garbage collection at any time from the basement garbage storage and collection area · the vehicle access and accommodation arrangements are to be constructed and marked in accordance with the certified plans
Reason: To ensure that parking spaces are in accordance with the approved development.
33. Car parking allocation
Car parking within the development shall be allocated in the following way:
Each adaptable dwelling must be provided with car parking complying with the dimensional and location requirements of AS2890.1 - parking spaces for people with disabilities.
At least one visitor space shall also comply with the dimensional and location requirements of AS2890.1 - parking spaces for people with disabilities.
1 resident car space will need to be allocated to the visitor car space requirement given that only 6 car spaces are annotated on DA04 Basement Plan, prepared by Connor and Solomon Architects, dated 30/03/17.
Consideration must be given to the means of access from disabled car parking spaces to other areas within the building and to footpath and roads and shall be clearly shown on the plans submitted with the Construction Certificate.
Reason: To ensure equity of access and appropriate facilities are available for people with disabilities in accordance with federal legislation.
34. Number of bicycle spaces
The basement car park shall be adapted to provide 28 bicycle spaces (24 in the basement and 4 adjacent to entry Arbor) in accordance with the Ku-ring-gai Development Control Plan (Local Centres) 2016. The bicycle parking spaces shall be designed in accordance with AS2890.3. Details shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the Certifying Authority prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate.
Reason: To provide alternative modes of transport to and from the site.
35. Energy Australia requirements
Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, the applicant must contact Energy Australia regarding power supply for the subject development. A written response detailing the full requirements of Energy Australia (including any need for underground cabling, substations or similar within or in the vicinity the development) shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority for approval prior to issue of the Construction Certificate.
Any structures or other requirements of Energy Australia shall be indicated on the plans issued with the Construction Certificate, to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority and Energy Australia. The requirements of Energy Australia must be met in full prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate.
Reason: To ensure compliance with the requirements of Energy Australia.
36. Utility provider requirements
Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, the applicant must make contact with all relevant utility providers whose services will be impacted upon by the development. A written copy of the requirements of each provider, as determined necessary by the Certifying Authority, must be obtained. All utility services or appropriate conduits for the same must be provided by the developer in accordance with the specifications of the utility providers.
Reason: To ensure compliance with the requirements of relevant utility providers.
37. Underground services
All electrical services (existing and proposed) shall be undergrounded from the proposed building on the site to the appropriate power pole(s) or other connection point. Undergrounding of services must not disturb the root system of existing trees and shall be undertaken in accordance with the requirements of the relevant service provided. Documentary evidence that the relevant service provider has been consulted and that their requirements have been met are to be provided to the Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate. All electrical and telephone services to the subject property must be placed underground and any redundant poles are to be removed at the expense of the applicant.
Reason: To provide infrastructure that facilitates the future improvement of the streetscape by relocation of overhead lines below ground.
Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of the construction certificate or prior to demolition, excavation or construction (whichever comes first):
38. Infrastructure damage security bond and inspection fee
To ensure that any damage to Council property as a result of construction activity is rectified in a timely matter:
(a) All work or activity undertaken pursuant to this development consent must be undertaken in a manner to avoid damage to Council property and must not jeopardise the safety of any person using or occupying the adjacent public areas.
(b) The applicant, builder, developer or any person acting in reliance on this consent shall be responsible for making good any damage to Council property and for the removal from Council property of any waste bin, building materials, sediment, silt, or any other material or article.
(c) The Infrastructure damage security bond and infrastructure inspection fee must be paid to Council by the applicant prior to both the issue of the Construction Certificate and the commencement of any earthworks or construction.
(d) In consideration of payment of the infrastructure damage security bond and infrastructure inspection fee, Council will undertake such inspections of Council Property as Council considers necessary and will also undertake, on behalf of the applicant, such restoration work to Council property, if any, that Council considers necessary as a consequence of the development. The provision of such restoration work by the Council does not absolve any person of the responsibilities contained in (a) to (b) above. Restoration work to be undertaken by Council referred to in this condition is limited to work that can be undertaken by Council at a cost of not more than the Infrastructure damage security bond payable pursuant to this condition.
(e) In this condition:
“Council property” includes any road, footway, footpath paving, kerbing, guttering, crossings, street furniture, seats, letter bins, trees, shrubs, lawns, mounds, bushland, and similar structures or features on any road or public road within the meaning of the Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) or any public place; and
“Infrastructure damage security bond and infrastructure inspection fee” means the Infrastructure damage security bond and infrastructure inspection fee as calculated in accordance with the Schedule of Fees & Charges adopted by Council as at the date of payment and the cost of any inspections required by the Council of Council property associated with this condition.
Reason: To maintain public infrastructure.
39. Section 94 Contributions - Centres.
This development is subject to a development contribution calculated in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010, being a s94 Contributions Plan in effect under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, as follows:
The contribution shall be paid to Council prior to the issue of any Construction Certificate, Linen Plan, Certificate of Subdivision or Occupation Certificate whichever comes first in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010.
The contributions specified above are subject to indexation and will continue to be indexed to reflect changes in the consumer price index and housing price index until they are paid in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 to reflect changes in the consumer price index and housing price index. Prior to payment, please contact Council directly to verify the current payable contributions.
Copies of Council’s Contribution Plans can be viewed at Council Chambers, 818 Pacific Hwy Gordon or on Council’s website at www.kmc.nsw.gov.au.
Reason: To ensure the provision, extension or augmentation of the Key Community Infrastructure identified in Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 that will, or is likely to be, required as a consequence of the development.
Conditions to be satisfied during the demolition, excavation and construction phases:
40. Road opening permit
The opening of any footway, roadway, road shoulder or any part of the road reserve shall not be carried out without a road opening permit being obtained from Council (upon payment of the required fee) beforehand.
Reason: Statutory requirement (Roads Act 1993 Section 138) and to maintain the integrity of Council’s infrastructure.
41. Prescribed conditions
The applicant shall comply with any relevant prescribed conditions of development consent under clause 98 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation. For the purposes of section 80A (11) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, the following conditions are prescribed in relation to a development consent for development that involves any building work:
· The work must be carried out in accordance with the requirements of the Building Code of Australia · In the case of residential building work for which the Home Building Act 1989 requires there to be a contract of insurance in force in accordance with Part 6 of that Act, that such a contract of insurance is in force before any works commence.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
42. Hours of work
Demolition, construction work and deliveries of building material and equipment must not take place outside the hours of 7.00am to 5.00pm Monday to Friday and 8.00am to 12 noon Saturday. No work and no deliveries are to take place on Sundays and public holidays.
Excavation using machinery must be limited to between 7.00am and 5.00pm Monday to Friday, with a respite break of 45 minutes between 12 noon and 1.00pm. No excavation using machinery is to occur on Saturdays, Sundays or public holidays.
Where it is necessary for works to occur outside of these hours (ie) placement of concrete for large floor areas on large residential/commercial developments or where building processes require the use of oversized trucks and/or cranes that are restricted by the RTA from travelling during daylight hours to deliver, erect or remove machinery, tower cranes, pre-cast panels, beams, tanks or service equipment to or from the site, approval for such activities will be subject to the issue of an "outside of hours works permit" from Council as well as notification of the surrounding properties likely to be affected by the proposed works.
Note: Failure to obtain a permit to work outside of the approved hours will result in on the spot fines being issued.
Reason: To ensure reasonable standards of amenity for occupants of neighbouring properties.
43. Approved plans to be on site
A copy of all approved and certified plans, specifications and documents incorporating conditions of consent and certification (including the Construction Certificate if required for the work) shall be kept on site at all times during the demolition, excavation and construction phases and must be readily available to any officer of Council or the Principal Certifying Authority.
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
44. Statement of compliance with Australian Standards
The demolition work shall comply with the provisions of Australian Standard AS2601: 2001 The Demolition of Structures. The work plans required by AS2601: 2001 shall be accompanied by a written statement from a suitably qualified person that the proposal contained in the work plan comply with the safety requirements of the Standard. The work plan and the statement of compliance shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the commencement of any works.
Reason: To ensure compliance with the Australian Standards.
45. Construction noise
During excavation, demolition and construction phases, noise generated from the site shall be controlled in accordance with the recommendations of the approved noise and vibration management plan.
Reason: To ensure reasonable standards of amenity to neighbouring properties.
46. Site notice
A site notice shall be erected on the site prior to any work commencing and shall be displayed throughout the works period.
The site notice must:
· be prominently displayed at the boundaries of the site for the purposes of informing the public that unauthorised entry to the site is not permitted · display project details including, but not limited to the details of the builder, Principal Certifying Authority and structural engineer · be durable and weatherproof · display the approved hours of work, the name of the site/project manager, the responsible managing company (if any), its address and 24 hour contact phone number for any inquiries, including construction/noise complaint are to be displayed on the site notice · be mounted at eye level on the perimeter hoardings/fencing and is to state that unauthorised entry to the site is not permitted
Reason: To ensure public safety and public information.
47. Dust control
During excavation, demolition and construction, adequate measures shall be taken to prevent dust from affecting the amenity of the neighbourhood. The following measures must be adopted:
· physical barriers shall be erected at right angles to the prevailing wind direction or shall be placed around or over dust sources to prevent wind or activity from generating dust · earthworks and scheduling activities shall be managed to coincide with the next stage of development to minimise the amount of time the site is left cut or exposed · all materials shall be stored or stockpiled at the best locations · the ground surface should be dampened slightly to prevent dust from becoming airborne but should not be wet to the extent that run-off occurs · all vehicles carrying spoil or rubble to or from the site shall at all times be covered to prevent the escape of dust · all equipment wheels shall be washed before exiting the site using manual or automated sprayers and drive-through washing bays · gates shall be closed between vehicle movements and shall be fitted with shade cloth · cleaning of footpaths and roadways shall be carried out daily
Reason: To protect the environment and amenity of surrounding properties.
48. Post-construction dilapidation report
The applicant shall engage a suitably qualified person to prepare a post construction dilapidation report at the completion of the construction works. This report is to ascertain whether the construction works created any structural damage to adjoining buildings, infrastructure and roads. The report is to be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority. In ascertaining whether adverse structural damage has occurred to adjoining buildings, infrastructure and roads, the Principal Certifying Authority must:
· compare the post-construction dilapidation report with the pre-construction dilapidation report · have written confirmation from the relevant authority that there is no adverse structural damage to their infrastructure and roads.
A copy of this report is to be forwarded to Council at the completion of the construction works.
Reason: Management of records.
49. Compliance with submitted geotechnical report
A contractor with specialist excavation experience must undertake the excavations for the development and a suitably qualified and consulting geotechnical engineer must oversee excavation.
Geotechnical aspects of the development work, namely:
· appropriate excavation method and vibration control · support and retention of excavated faces · hydro-geological considerations
must be undertaken in accordance with the recommendations of the Geotechnical Report prepared by Jeffery and Katauskas Pty Ltd Ref: 28805SYrpt dated 18 December 2015. Approval must be obtained from all affected property owners, including Ku-ring-gai Council, where rock anchors (both temporary and permanent) are proposed below adjoining property(ies).
Reason: To ensure the safety and protection of property.
50. Use of road or footpath
During excavation, demolition and construction phases, no building materials, plant or the like are to be stored on the road or footpath without written approval being obtained from Council beforehand. The pathway shall be kept in a clean, tidy and safe condition during building operations. Council reserves the right, without notice, to rectify any such breach and to charge the cost against the applicant/owner/builder, as the case may be.
Reason: To ensure safety and amenity of the area.
51. Guarding excavations
All excavation, demolition and construction works shall be properly guarded and protected with hoardings or fencing to prevent them from being dangerous to life and property.
Reason: To ensure public safety.
52. Toilet facilities
During excavation, demolition and construction phases, toilet facilities are to be provided, on the work site, at the rate of one toilet for every 20 persons or part of 20 persons employed at the site.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
53. Protection of public places
If the work involved in the erection, demolition or construction of the development is likely to cause pedestrian or vehicular traffic in a public place to be obstructed or rendered inconvenient, or building involves the enclosure of a public place, a hoarding or fence must be erected between the work site and the public place.
If necessary, a hoarding is to be erected, sufficient to prevent any substance from, or in connection with, the work falling into the public place.
The work site must be kept lit between sunset and sunrise if it is likely to be hazardous to persons in the public place.
Any hoarding, fence or awning is to be removed when the work has been completed.
Reason: To protect public places.
54. Recycling of building material (general)
During demolition and construction, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that building materials suitable for recycling have been forwarded to an appropriate registered business dealing in recycling of materials. Materials to be recycled must be kept in good order.
Reason: To facilitate recycling of materials.
55. Construction signage
All construction signs must comply with the following requirements:
· are not to cover any mechanical ventilation inlet or outlet vent · are not illuminated, self-illuminated or flashing at any time · are located wholly within a property where construction is being undertaken · refer only to the business(es) undertaking the construction and/or the site at which the construction is being undertaken · are restricted to one such sign per property · do not exceed 2.5m2 · are removed within 14 days of the completion of all construction works
Reason: To ensure compliance with Council's controls regarding signage.
56. Maintenance period for works in public road
A maintenance period of six (6) months applies to all work in the public road reserve carried out by the applicant - after the works have been completed to the satisfaction of Ku-ring-gai Council. In that maintenance period, the applicant shall be liable for any section of the public infrastructure work which fails to perform in the designed manner, or as would reasonably be expected under the operating conditions. The maintenance period shall commence once the applicant receives a formal letter from Council stating that the works involving public infrastructure have been completed satisfactorily.
Reason: To protect public infrastructure.
57. Road reserve safety
All public footways and roadways fronting and adjacent to the site must be maintained in a safe condition at all times during the course of the development works. Construction materials must not be stored in the road reserve. A safe pedestrian circulation route and a pavement/route free of trip hazards must be maintained at all times on or adjacent to any public access ways fronting the construction site. Where public infrastructure is damaged, repair works must be carried out when and as directed by Council officers. Where pedestrian circulation is diverted on to the roadway or verge areas, clear directional signage and protective barricades must be installed in accordance with AS1742-3 (1996) “Traffic Control Devices for Work on Roads”. If pedestrian circulation is not satisfactorily maintained across the site frontage, and action is not taken promptly to rectify the defects, Council may undertake proceedings to stop work.
Reason: To ensure safe public footways and roadways during construction.
58. Services
Where required, the adjustment or inclusion of any new utility service facilities must be carried out by the applicant and in accordance with the requirements of the relevant utility authority. These works shall be at no cost to Council. It is the applicants’ full responsibility to make contact with the relevant utility authorities to ascertain the impacts of the proposal upon utility services (including water, phone, gas and the like). Council accepts no responsibility for any matter arising from its approval to this application involving any influence upon utility services provided by another authority.
Reason: Provision of utility services.
59. Erosion control
Temporary sediment and erosion control and measures are to be installed prior to the commencement of any works on the site. These measures must be maintained in working order during construction works up to completion. All sediment traps must be cleared on a regular basis and after each major storm and/or as directed by the Principal Certifying Authority and Council officers.
Reason: To protect the environment from erosion and sedimentation.
60. Sydney Water Section 73 Compliance Certificate
The applicant must obtain a Section 73 Compliance Certificate under the Sydney Water Act 1994. An application must be made through an authorised Water Servicing CoOrdinator. The applicant is to refer to “Your Business” section of Sydney Water’s web site at www.sydneywater.com.au then the “e-develop” icon or telephone 13 20 92. Following application a “Notice of Requirements” will detail water and sewer extensions to be built and charges to be paid. Please make early contact with the CoOrdinator, since building of water/sewer extensions can be time consuming and may impact on other services and building, driveway or landscape design.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
61. Project arborist
A suitably qualified project arborist (AQF level 5) is to be engaged to advise the Principal Certifying Authority on the protection of trees at the site and to supervise the installation and maintenance of tree protection measures required by this consent.
Prior to the commencement of any works including demolition on the site in areas required to be protected by this consent, the project arborist shall inspect the site and satisfy himself/herself that the protection measures are in accordance with the approved design and must provide a written certification to the Principal Certifying Authority to that effect. If not satisfied, the project arborist must provide to the Principal Certifying Authority a list of works that are to be completed to ensure compliance with all conditions of consent relating to the protection of trees at the site. Those works must be undertaken to the satisfaction of the project arborist.
Reason: To ensure protection of existing trees.
62. Arborist’s report
All trees to be retained shall be inspected and monitored by an AQF Level 5 Arborist in accordance with AS4970-2009 and an Arboricultural Assessment prepared by Angophora Consulting Arborist dated 29/07/16 and an arborist assessment, prepared by Elke Landscape Architect, dated 20/02/17 during and after completion of development works to ensure their long term survival.
Regular inspections and documentation from the project arborist to the Principal Certifying Authority are required during all works within the canopy spread of all existing trees on site and overhanging from adjoining sites, including date, brief description of the works inspected, and any mitigation works prescribed.
All monitoring shall be provided to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate.
· All works as recommended by the project arborist are to be undertaken by an experienced arborist with a minimum AQF Level 3 qualification.
Reason: To ensure protection of existing trees.
63. Canopy/root pruning
Canopy and/or root pruning of the following tree/s shall be undertaken by an experienced Arborist/Horticulturist, with a minimum qualification of the Horticulture Certificate or Tree Surgery Certificate. All pruning works shall be undertaken as specified in Australian Standard 4373-2007 - Pruning of Amenity Trees.
Reason: To protect the environment.
64. Treatment of tree roots
If tree roots are required to be severed for the purposes of constructing the approved works, they shall be cut cleanly by hand, by an experienced Arborist/Horticulturist with a minimum qualification of Horticulture Certificate or Tree Surgery Certificate. All pruning works shall be undertaken as specified in Australian Standard 4373-2007 – Pruning of Amenity Trees.
Reason: To protect existing trees.
65. Hand excavation
All excavation excluding for the basement within the specified radius of the trunk(s) of the following tree(s) shall be hand dug:
Reason: To protect existing trees.
66. No storage of materials beneath trees
No activities, storage or disposal of materials shall take place beneath the canopy of any tree protected under Council's Tree Preservation Order at any time.
Reason: To protect existing trees.
67. Removal of refuse
All builders' refuse, spoil and/or material unsuitable for use in landscape areas shall be removed from the site on completion of the building works.
Reason: To protect the environment.
68. Canopy replenishment trees to be planted
The canopy replenishment trees to be planted shall be maintained in a healthy and vigorous condition until they attain a height of 5.0 metres whereby they will be protected by Council’s Tree Preservation Order. Any of the trees found faulty, damaged, dying or dead shall be replaced with the same species.
Reason: To maintain the treed character of the area.
69. Survey and inspection of waste collection clearance and path of travel
At the stage when formwork for the ground floor slab is in place and prior to concrete being poured, a registered surveyor is to:
· ascertain the reduced level of the underside of the slab at the driveway entry, · certify that the level is not lower than the level shown on the approved DA plans; and · certify that the minimum headroom of 2.6 metres will be available for the full path of travel of the small waste collection vehicle from the street to the collection area. · This certification is to be provided to Council’s Development Engineer prior to any concrete being poured for the ground floor slab. · No work is to proceed until Council has undertaken an inspection to determine clearance and path of travel.
At the stage when formwork for the ground floor slab is in place and prior to concrete being poured, Council’s Development Engineer and Manager Waste Services are to carry out an inspection of the site to confirm the clearance available for the full path of travel of the small waste collection vehicle from the street to the collection area. This inspection may not be carried out by a private certifier because waste management is not a matter listed in Clause 161 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000.
Reason: To ensure access will be available for Council’s contractors to collect waste from the collection point.
70. On site retention of waste dockets
All demolition, excavation and construction waste dockets are to be retained on site, or at suitable location, in order to confirm which facility received materials generated from the site for recycling or disposal.
· Each docket is to be an official receipt from a facility authorised to accept the material type, for disposal or processing. · This information is to be made available at the request of an Authorised Officer of Council.
Reason: To protect the environment.
Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate:
71. Easement for waste collection
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, an easement for waste collection is to be created under Section 88B of the Conveyancing Act 1919. This is to permit legal access for Council, Council’s contractors and their vehicles over the subject property for the purpose of collecting waste from the property. The terms of the easement are to be generally in accordance with Council’s draft terms for an easement for waste collection and shall be to the satisfaction of Council’s Development Engineer.
Reason: To permit legal access for Council, Council’s contractors and their vehicles over the subject site for waste collection.
72. Compliance with BASIX Certificate
Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that all commitments listed in the relevant BASIX Certificate have been complied with.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
73. Clotheslines and clothes dryers
Prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the units either have access to an external clothes line located in common open space or have a mechanical clothes dryer installed.
Reason: To provide access to clothes drying facilities.
74. Mechanical ventilation
Following completion, installation and testing of all the mechanical ventilation systems, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied of the following prior to the issue of any Occupation Certificate:
1. The installation and performance of the mechanical systems complies with:
· The Building Code of Australia · Australian Standard AS1668 · Australian Standard AS3666 where applicable
2. The mechanical ventilation system in isolation and in association with other mechanical ventilation equipment, when in operation will not be audible within a habitable room in any other residential premises before 7am and after 10pm Monday to Friday and before 8am and after 10pm Saturday, Sunday and public holidays. The operation of the unit outside these restricted hours shall emit a noise level of not greater than 5dbA above the background when measured at the nearest adjoining boundary.
Note: Written confirmation from an acoustic engineer that the development achieves the above requirements is to be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate.
Reason: To protect the amenity of surrounding properties.
75. Completion of landscape works
Prior to the release of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that all landscape works, including the removal of all noxious and/or environmental weed species, have been undertaken in accordance with the approved plan(s) and conditions of consent.
Reason: To ensure that the landscape works are consistent with the development consent.
76. Completion of tree works
Prior to the release of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that all tree works, including pruning in accordance with AS4373-2007 or remediation works in accordance with AS4370-2009, have been undertaken in accordance with the approved plan(s) and conditions of consent.
Reason: To ensure that the tree works are consistent with the development consent.
77. Accessibility
Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that:
· the lift design and associated functions are compliant with AS 1735.12 & AS 1428.2 · the level and direction of travel, both in lifts and lift lobbies, is audible and visible · the controls for lifts are accessible to all persons and control buttons and lettering are raised · international symbols have been used with specifications relating to signs, symbols and size of lettering complying with AS 1428.2 · the height of lettering on signage is in accordance with AS 1428.1 – 1993 · the signs and other information indicating access and services incorporate tactile communication methods in addition to the visual methods
Reason: Disabled access & services.
78. Retention and re-use positive covenant
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the applicant must create a positive covenant and restriction on the use of land under Section 88E of the Conveyancing Act 1919, burdening the property with the requirement to maintain the site stormwater retention and re-use facilities on the property.
The terms of the instruments are to be generally in accordance with the Council's "draft terms of Section 88B instruments for protection of retention and re-use facilities" and to the satisfaction of Council (refer to Council’s Local Centres DCP Volume C Part 24R.8). For existing titles, the positive covenant and the restriction on the use of land is to be created through an application to the Land Titles Office in the form of a request using forms 13PC and 13RPA. The relative location of the reuse and retention facility, in relation to the building footprint, must be shown on a scale sketch, attached as an annexure to the request forms.
Registered title documents showing the covenants and restrictions must be submitted to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate.
Reason: To protect the environment.
79. Certification of drainage works
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that:
· the stormwater drainage works have been satisfactorily completed in accordance with the approved Construction Certificate drainage plans · the minimum retention and on-site detention storage volume requirements of BASIX and Ku-ring-gai Local Centres DCP Volume C Part 24C.5 respectively, have been achieved · retained water is connected and available for use · basement and subsoil areas are able to drain via a pump/sump system installed in accordance with AS3500.3 and Ku-ring-gai Local Centres DCP Volume C Part 24R.6 · all grates potentially accessible by children are secured · components of the new drainage system have been installed by a licensed plumbing contractor in accordance with the Plumbing and Drainage Code AS3500.3 2003 and the Building Code of Australia · all enclosed floor areas, including habitable and garage floor levels, are safeguarded from outside stormwater runoff ingress by suitable differences in finished levels, gradings and provision of stormwater collection devices
Note: Evidence from a qualified and experienced consulting civil/hydraulic engineer documenting compliance with the above is to be provided to Council prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate.
Reason: To protect the environment.
80. WAE plans for stormwater management and disposal
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, a registered surveyor must provide a works as executed survey of the completed stormwater drainage and management systems. The survey must be submitted to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate. The survey must indicate:
· as built (reduced) surface and invert levels for all drainage pits · gradients of drainage lines, materials and dimensions · as built (reduced) level(s) at the approved point of discharge to the public drainage system · as built location and internal dimensions of all detention and retention structures on the property (in plan view) and horizontal distances to nearest adjacent boundaries and structures on site · the achieved storage volumes of the installed retention and detention storages and derivative calculations · as built locations of all access pits and grates in the detention and retention system(s), including dimensions · the size of the orifice or control fitted to any on-site detention system · dimensions of the discharge control pit and access grates · the maximum depth of storage possible over the outlet control · top water levels of storage areas and indicative RL’s through the overland flow path in the event of blockage of the on-site detention system
The works as executed plan(s) must show the as built details above in comparison to those shown on the drainage plans approved with the Construction Certificate prior to commencement of works. All relevant levels and details indicated must be marked in red on a copy of the Principal Certifying Authority stamped construction certificate stormwater plans.
Reason: To protect the environment.
81. OSD positive covenant/restriction
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the applicant must create a positive covenant and restriction on the use of land under Section 88E of the Conveyancing Act 1919, burdening the owner with the requirement to maintain the on-site stormwater detention facilities on the lot.
The terms of the instruments are to be generally in accordance with the Council's "draft terms of Section 88B instrument for protection of on-site detention facilities" and to the satisfaction of Council (refer to Council’s Local Centres DCP Volume C Part 24R.8). For existing titles, the positive covenant and the restriction on the use of land is to be created through an application to the Land Titles Office in the form of a request using forms 13PC and 13RPA. The relative location of the on-site detention facility, in relation to the building footprint, must be shown on a scale sketch, attached as an annexure to the request forms.
Registered title documents, showing the covenants and restrictions, must be submitted and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate.
Reason: To protect the environment.
82. Sydney Water Section 73 Compliance Certificate
Prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate the Section 73 Sydney water Compliance Certificate must be obtained and submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority
Reason: Statutory requirement.
83. Certification of as-constructed driveway/carpark – RFB
Prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that:
· the as-constructed car park complies with the approved Construction Certificate plans · the completed vehicle access and accommodation arrangements comply with Australian Standard 2890.1 – 2004 “Off-Street car parking" and the Seniors Living State Environment Planning Policy in terms of minimum parking space dimensions · finished driveway gradients and transitions will not result in the scraping of the underside of cars · no doors, gates, grilles or other structures have been provided in the access driveways to the basement carpark, which would prevent unrestricted access for internal garbage collection from the basement garbage storage and collection area · the vehicular headroom requirements of: - Australian Standard 2890.1 – “Off-street car parking”, - The Seniors Living SEPP (as last amended) for accessible parking spaces, - 2.6 metres height clearance for waste collection trucks (refer DCP 40) are met from the public street into and within the applicable areas of the basement carpark.
Note: Evidence from a suitably qualified and experienced traffic/civil engineer indicating compliance with the above is to be provided to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate.
Reason: To ensure that vehicular access and accommodation areas are compliant with the consent.
84. Reinstatement of redundant crossings and completion of infrastructure works
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority must be satisfied that he or she has received a signed inspection form from Council which states that the following works in the road reserve have been completed:
· new concrete driveway crossing in accordance with levels and specifications issued by Council · removal of all redundant driveway crossings and kerb laybacks (or sections thereof) and reinstatement of these areas to footpath, turfed verge and upright kerb and gutter (reinstatement works to match surrounding adjacent infrastructure with respect to integration of levels and materials) · full repair and resealing of any road surface damaged during construction · full replacement of damaged sections of grass verge to match existing
This inspection may not be carried out by the Private Certifier because restoration of Council property outside the boundary of the site is not a matter listed in Clause 161 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000.
All works must be completed in accordance with the General Specification for the Construction of Road and Drainage Works in Ku-ring-gai Council, dated November 2004. The Occupation Certificate must not be issued until all damaged public infrastructure caused as a result of construction works on the subject site (including damage caused by, but not limited to, delivery vehicles, waste collection, contractors, sub contractors, concrete vehicles) is fully repaired to the satisfaction of Council. Repair works shall be at no cost to Council.
Reason: To protect the streetscape.
85. Infrastructure repair
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority must be satisfied that any damaged public infrastructure caused as a result of construction works (including damage caused by, but not limited to, delivery vehicles, waste collection, contractors, sub contractors, concrete vehicles) is fully repaired to the satisfaction of Council Development Engineer and at no cost to Council.
Reason: To protect public infrastructure.
86. Fire safety certificate
Prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a Fire Safety Certificate for all the essential fire or other safety measures forming part of this consent has been completed and provided to Council.
Note: A copy of the Fire Safety Certificate must be submitted to Council.
Reason: To ensure suitable fire safety measures are in place.
Conditions to be satisfied at all times:
87. Outdoor lighting
At all times for the life of the approved development, all outdoor lighting shall not detrimentally impact upon the amenity of other premises and adjacent dwellings and shall comply with, where relevant, AS/NZ1158.3: 2005 Pedestrian Area (Category P) Lighting and AS4282: 1997 Control of the Obtrusive Effects of Outdoor Lighting.
Reason: To protect the amenity of surrounding properties.
88. Noise control – plant and machinery
All noise generating equipment associated with any proposed mechanical ventilation system/s shall be located and/or soundproofed so the equipment is not audible within a habitable room in any other residential premises before 7am and after 10pm Monday to Friday and before 8am and after 10pm Saturday, Sunday and public holidays. The operation of the unit outside these restricted hours shall emit a noise level of not greater than 5dbA above the background when measured at the nearest boundary.
Reason: To protect the amenity of surrounding residents.
89. Car parking
At all times, the visitor car parking spaces are to be clearly identified and are to be for the exclusive use of visitors to the site. On site permanent car parking spaces are not to be used by those other than an occupant or tenant of the subject building. Any occupant, tenant, lessee or registered proprietor of the development site or part thereof shall not enter into an agreement to lease, license or transfer ownership of any car parking spaces to those other than an occupant, tenant or lessee of the building. These requirements are to be enforced through the following:
· restrictive covenant placed on title pursuant to Section 88B of the Conveyancing Act, 1919 · restriction on use under Section 68 of the Strata Schemes (Leasehold Development) Act, 1986 to all lots comprising in part or whole car parking spaces
Reason: To ensure adequate provision of visitor parking spaces.
Integrated referral conditions
90. Sydney Trains concurrence conditions
a. Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate the Applicant shall submit to Sydney Trains for approval certification the following items: a. Final Geotechnical Report b. Final detailed Structural report/drawings c. Construction methodology with details pertaining to structural support during excavation. d. Final cross sectional drawings showing ground surface, rail tracks, sub soil profile, proposed basement excavation and structural design of sub ground support adjacent to the Rail Corridor. e. Detailed Survey Plan showing the relationship of the proposed development with respect to RailCorp's land and infrastructure. f. If required by Sydney Trains, an FE analysis which assesses the different stages of loading unloading of the site and its effect on the rock mass surrounding the rail corridor. g. Final Drainage details consistent with Concept Storm water Management Ground Plan (Drawing No. H04/P5 dated 29/11/16) prepared by AJ Whipps Consulting Group.
b. If required by Sydney Trains, prior to the commencement of works, prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate, or at any time during the excavation and construction period deemed necessary by Sydney Trains, a joint inspection of the rail infrastructure and property in the vicinity of the project is to be carried out by representatives from Sydney Trains and the Applicant. These dilapidation surveys will establish the extent of any existing damage and enable any deterioration during construction to be observed. The submission of a detailed dilapidation report will be required unless otherwise notified by Sydney Trains.
c. Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate, the Applicant shall provide an accurate survey locating the development with respect to the rail boundary and rail infrastructure. This work is to be undertaken by a registered surveyor, to the satisfaction of Sydney Trains representative.
d. Given the possible likelihood of objects being dropped, thrown or blown onto the rail corridor from balconies, windows and other external features (e.g. roof terraces and external fire escapes) that face the rail corridor, the Applicant is required to install measures (e.g. awning windows, louvres, enclosed balconies etc.) which prevent the throwing of objects onto the rail corridor. The Principal Certifying Authority shall not issue the Construction Certificate until it has confirmed that these measures are to be installed and have been indicated on the Construction Drawings.
e. Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate, the Applicant is to provide Sydney Trains with a report from a qualified structural engineer demonstrating that the structural design of the development satisfies the requirements of AS5100. The Principal Certifying Authority shall not issue the Construction Certificate until it has received written confirmation from Sydney Trains that it has received this report and the Principal Certifying Authority has also confirmed that the measures recommended in engineers report have been indicated on the Construction Drawings.
f. Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate the Applicant is to submit to Sydney Trains the demolition, excavation and construction methodology and staging for review and endorsement. The Principle Certifying Authority is not to issue the Construction Certificate until written confirmation has been received from Sydney Trains confirming that this condition has been satisfied.
g. An acoustic assessment is to be submitted to Council prior to the issue of a construction certificate demonstrating how the proposed development will comply with the Department of Planning's document titled "Development Near Rail Corridors and Busy Roads- Interim Guidelines".
h. Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate the Applicant is to engage an Electrolysis Expert to prepare a report on the Electrolysis Risk to the development from stray currents. The Applicant must incorporate in the development all the measures recommended in the report to control that risk. A copy of the report is to be provided to the Principal Certifying Authority with the application for a Construction Certificate.
i. The design, installation and use of lights, signs and reflective materials, whether permanent or temporary, which are (or from which reflected light might be) visible from the rail corridor must limit glare and reflectivity to the satisfaction of Sydney Trains. The Principal Certifying Authority is not to issue the Construction Certificate until written confirmation has been received from Sydney Trains confirming that this condition has been satisfied.
j. If required by Sydney Trains, prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate a Risk Assessment/Management Plan and detailed Safe Work Method Statements (SWMS) for the proposed works are to be submitted to Sydney Trains for review and comment on the impacts on rail corridor. The Principal Certifying Authority is not to issue the Construction Certificate until written confirmation has been received from Sydney Trains confirming that this condition has been satisfied.
k. No metal ladders, tapes and plant/machinery, or conductive material are to be used within 6 horizontal metres of any live electrical equipment. This applies to the train pantographs and 1500V catenary, contact and pull-off wires of the adjacent tracks, and to any high voltage aerial supplies within or adjacent to the rail corridor.
l. Prior to the issuing of a Construction Certificate the Applicant is to submit to Sydney Trains a plan showing all crane age and other aerial operations for the development and must comply with all Sydney Trains requirements. The Principal Certifying Authority is not to issue the Construction Certificate until written confirmation has been received from the Sydney Trains confirming that this condition has been satisfied.
m. If required by Sydney Trains, a track monitoring plan (including instrumentation and the monitoring regime during excavation and construction phases) is to be submitted to Sydney Trains for review and endorsement prior to the issuing of a Construction Certificate. The Principal Certifying Authority is not to issue a Construction Certificate until written confirmation has been received from Sydney Trains advising of the need to undertake the track monitoring plan, and if required, that it has been endorsed.
n. Unless advised by Sydney Trains in writing, all excavation, shoring and piling works within 25m of the rail corridor are to be supervised by a geotechnical engineer experienced with such excavation projects.
o. No rock anchors/bolts are to be installed into Sydney Trains property or easements.
p. Prior to the issuing of an Occupation Certificate the Applicant is to submit as-built drawings to Sydney Trains and Council. The as-built drawings are to be endorsed by a Registered Surveyor confirming that there has been no encroachment into Sydney Trains property or easements, unless agreed to be these authorities. The Principal Certifying Authority is not to issue the final Occupation Certificate until written confirmation has been received from Sydney Trains confirming that this condition has been satisfied.
q. Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate the Applicant is to contact Sydney Trains Rail Corridor Management Group to determine the need for public liability insurance cover. If insurance cover is deemed necessary this insurance be for sum as determined by Sydney Trains and shall not contain any exclusion in relation to works on or near the rail corridor, rail infrastructure. The Applicant is to contact Sydney Trains Rail Corridor Management Group to obtain the level of insurance required for this particular proposal. Prior to issuing the Construction Certificate the Principal Certifying Authority must witness written proof of this insurance in conjunction with Sydney Trains written advice to the Applicant on the level of insurance required.
r. Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate the Applicant is to contact Sydney Trains Rail Corridor Management Group to determine the need for the lodgement of a Bond or Bank Guarantee for the duration of the works. The Bond/Bank Guarantee shall be for the sum determined by Sydney Trains. Prior to issuing the Construction Certificate the Principal Certifying Authority must witness written advice from Sydney Trains confirming the lodgement of this Bond/Bank Guarantee.
s. Sydney Trains or Transport for NSW (TfNSW), and persons authorised by those entities for the purpose of this condition, are entitled to inspect the site of the development and all structures to enable it to consider whether those structures have been or are being constructed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans and these conditions of consent, on giving reasonable notice to the principal contractor for the development or the owner or occupier of the part of the site to which access is sought.
t. Prior to the issuing of a Construction Certificate the Applicant is to submit to Sydney Trains a plan showing all craneage and other aerial operations for the development and must comply with all Sydney Trains requirements. If required by Sydney Trains, the Applicant must amend the plan showing all craneage and other aerial operations to comply with all Sydney Trains requirements. The Principal Certifying Authority is not to issue the Construction Certificate until written confirmation has been received from the Sydney Trains confirming that this condition has been satisfied.
u. Copies of any certificates, drawings, approval/certification or documents endorsed by, given to or issued by Sydney Trains must be submitted to Council for its records prior to the issuing of a Construction Certificate.
v. The Applicant must provide a plan of how future maintenance of the development facing the rail corridor is to be undertaken. The maintenance plan is to be submitted to Sydney Trains prior to the issuing of the Occupancy Certificate. The Principal Certifying Authority shall not issue an Occupation Certificate until written confirmation has been received from Sydney Trains advising that the maintenance plan has been prepared to its satisfaction.
w. No scaffolding is to be used within 6 horizontal metres of the rail corridor unless prior written approval has been obtained from Sydney Trains. To obtain approval the applicant will be required to submit details of the scaffolding, the means of erecting and securing this scaffolding, the material to be used, and the type of screening to be installed to prevent objects falling onto the rail corridor.
x. The' following items are to be submitted to Sydney Trains for review and endorsement prior to the issuing of a Construction Certificate:
· Machinery to be used during excavation/construction.
y. The Principal Certifying Authority is not to issue the Construction Certificate until it has received written confirmation from Sydney Trains that this condition has been complied with.
z. Prior to the commencement of works appropriate fencing/hoarding is to be in place along the rail corridor/station to prevent unauthorised access to the rail corridor during works. Details of the type of fencing and the method of erection are to be to the satisfaction of Sydney Trains prior to the fencing/hoarding work being undertaken.
aa. The Applicant shall have appropriate fencing fit for the future usage of the development site to prevent unauthorised access to the rail corridor by future occupants of the development. Prior to the issuing of an Occupation Certificate the Applicant shall liaise with Sydney Trains regarding the adequacy of any existing fencing along the rail corridor boundary. Details of the type of new fencing to be installed and the method of erection are to be to the satisfaction of Sydney Trains prior to the fencing work being undertaken.
bb. Any conditions issued as part of Sydney Trains approval/certification of any documentation for compliance with the Sydney Trains conditions of consent, those approval/certification conditions will also form part of the consent conditions that the Applicant is required to comply with.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY |
94 |
24 Cowan Road St Ives - Demolition of Existing Structures and Construction of a Multi-Dwelling Development Comprising Six Villas and Two Town-Houses, Parking and Associated Landscaping
File: DA0289/16 Vide: GB.4
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
To determine Development Application No. DA0289/16 which seeks consent for the demolition of the existing structures and construction of a multi-dwelling development comprising six villas and two town-houses, parking and associated landscaping.
The following members of the public addressed Council on this item:
J Duncan
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Resolved:
(Moved: Councillors Berlioz/Szatow)
A. THAT Council, as the consent authority, is of the opinion that the variation request submitted under Clause 4.6 of Ku-ring-gai LEP (Local Centres) 2012 to vary the minimum street frontage development standard has met the requirements of clause 4.6(4) of the Ku-ring-gai LEP (Local Centres) 2012. Council is also of the opinion that strict compliance with the development standard is unreasonable and unnecessary in the circumstances of the case and that there are sufficient environmental planning grounds to justify the variation to the development standard.
AND
B. THAT Council, as the consent authority, grant development consent to DA0289/16 for the demolition of the existing structures and construction of a multi-dwelling development comprising six villas and two town-houses, parking and associated landscaping on land at 24 Cowan Road, St Ives, subject to conditions. Pursuant to Section 95(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, this consent lapses if the approved works are not physically commenced within two years of the date of the Notice of Determination.
Conditions that identify approved plans:
1. Approved architectural plans and documentation (new development)
The development must be carried out in accordance with the following plans and documentation listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, except where amended by other conditions of this consent:
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
2. Inconsistency between documents
In the event of any inconsistency between conditions of this consent and the drawings/documents referred to above, the conditions of this consent prevail.
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
3. Approved landscape plans
Landscape works shall be carried out in accordance with the following landscape plan(s), listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, except where amended by other conditions of this consent:
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
Conditions to be satisfied prior to demolition, excavation or construction:
4. Asbestos works
All work involving asbestos products and materials, including asbestos-cement-sheeting (ie. Fibro), must be carried out in accordance with the guidelines for asbestos work published by WorkCover Authority of NSW.
Reason: To ensure public safety.
5. Notice of commencement
At least 48 hours prior to the commencement of any development (including demolition, excavation, shoring or underpinning works), a notice of commencement of building or subdivision work form and appointment of the principal certifying authority form shall be submitted to Council.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
6. Notification of builder’s details
Prior to the commencement of any development or excavation works, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be notified in writing of the name and contractor licence number of the owner/builder intending to carry out the approved works.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
7. Dilapidation survey and report (public infrastructure)
Prior to the commencement of any development or excavation works on site, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a dilapidation report on the visible and structural condition of all structures of the following public infrastructure, has been completed and submitted to Council:
Public infrastructure
· Full road pavement width, including kerb and gutter, of Cowan road over the site frontage. · All driveway crossings and laybacks opposite the subject site.
The report must be completed by a consulting structural/civil engineer. Particular attention must be paid to accurately recording (both written and photographic) existing damaged areas on the aforementioned infrastructure so that Council is fully informed when assessing any damage to public infrastructure caused as a result of the development.
The developer may be held liable to any recent damage to public infrastructure in the vicinity of the site, where such damage is not accurately recorded by the requirements of this condition prior to the commencement of works.
Note: A written acknowledgment from Council must be obtained (attesting to this condition being appropriately satisfied) and submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the commencement of any excavation works.
Reason: To record the structural condition of public infrastructure before works commence.
8. Dilapidation survey and report (private property)
Prior to the commencement of any demolition or excavation works on site, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a dilapidation report on the visible and structural condition of all structures upon the following lands, has been completed and submitted to Council:
The dilapidation report must include a photographic survey of adjoining properties detailing their physical condition, both internally and externally, including such items as walls ceilings, roof and structural members. The report must be completed by a consulting structural/geotechnical engineer as determined necessary by that professional based on the excavations for the proposal and the recommendations of the submitted geotechnical report.
In the event that access for undertaking the dilapidation survey is denied by a property owner, the applicant must demonstrate in writing to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority that all reasonable steps have been taken to obtain access and advise the affected property owner of the reason for the survey and that these steps have failed.
Note: A copy of the dilapidation report is to be provided to Council prior to any excavation works been undertaken. The dilapidation report is for record keeping purposes only and may be used by an applicant or affected property owner to assist in any civil action required to resolve any dispute over damage to adjoining properties arising from works.
Reason: To record the structural condition of likely affected properties before works commence.
9. Construction and traffic management plan
The applicant must submit to Council a Construction Traffic Management Plan (TMP), which is to be approved prior to the commencement of any works on site.
The plan is to consist of a report with Traffic Control Plans attached.
The report is to contain commitments which must be followed by the demolition and excavation contractor, builder, owner and subcontractors. The TMP applies to all persons associated with demolition, excavation and construction of the development.
The report is to contain construction vehicle routes for approach and departure to and from all directions.
The report is to contain a site plan showing entry and exit points. For tree protection purposes, the use of the existing driveway and crossing for construction access is required. Swept paths are to be shown on the site plan showing access and egress for a 12.5 metre long heavy rigid vehicle and if required for demolition and excavation stages a 19.0 metre long articulated vehicle are to be shown. Construction vehicles for all stages of the development should be able to turn into the site without crossing the median strip in Cowan Road.
The Traffic Control Plans are to be prepared by a qualified person (red card holder). One must be provided for each of the following stages of the works:
· demolition · excavation · concrete pour · construction of vehicular crossing and reinstatement of footpath · traffic control for vehicles reversing into or out of the site
Traffic controllers must be in place at the site entry and exit points to control heavy vehicle movements in order to maintain the safety of pedestrians and other road users.
When a satisfactory TMP is received, a letter of approval will be issued with conditions attached. Traffic management at the site must comply with the approved TMP as well as any conditions in the letter issued by Council. Council’s Rangers will be patrolling the site regularly and fines will be issued for any non-compliance with this condition.
Reason: To ensure that appropriate measures have been considered during all phases of the construction process in a manner that maintains the environmental amenity and ensures the ongoing safety and protection of people.
10. Work zone
A works zone shall be provided along the site frontage. The applicant must make a written application to the Ku-ring-gai Local Traffic Committee to install the work zone. Work zones are provided specifically for the set down and pick up of materials and not for the parking of private vehicles associated with the site. Work zones will generally not be approved where there is sufficient space on-site for the setting down and picking up of goods being taken to or from a construction site.
If the work zone is approved by the Local Traffic Committee, the applicant must obtain a written copy of the related resolution from the Ku-ring-gai Local Traffic Committee and submit this to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to commencement of any works on site.
Where approval of the work zone is resolved by the Committee, the necessary work zone signage shall be installed (at the cost of the applicant) and the adopted fee paid prior to commencement of any works on site. At the expiration of the work zone approval, the applicant is required to remove the work zone signs and reinstate any previous signs at their expense.
In the event the work zone is required for a period beyond that initially approved by the Traffic Committee, the applicant shall make a payment to Council for the extended period in accordance with Council’s schedule of fees and charges for work zones prior to the extended period commencing.
Reason: To ensure that appropriate measures have been made for the operation of the site during the construction phase.
11. Sediment controls
Prior to any work commencing on site, sediment and erosion control measures shall be installed along the contour immediately downslope of any future disturbed areas.
The form of the sediment controls to be installed on the site shall be determined by reference to the Landcom manual ‘Managing Urban Stormwater: Soils and Construction’. The erosion controls shall be maintained in an operational condition until the development activities have been completed and the site fully stabilised. Sediment shall be removed from the sediment controls following each heavy or prolonged rainfall period.
Reason: To preserve and enhance the natural environment.
12. Erosion and drainage management
Earthworks and/or demolition of any existing buildings shall not commence until an erosion and sediment control plan is submitted to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority. The plan shall comply with the guidelines set out in the NSW Department of Housing manual "Managing Urban Stormwater: Soils and Construction" certificate. Erosion and sediment control works shall be implemented in accordance with the erosion and sediment control plan.
Reason: To preserve and enhance the natural environment.
13. Tree protection fencing
To preserve the following tree/s, no work shall commence until the area beneath their canopy is fenced off at the specified radius from the trunk/s to prevent any activities, storage or the disposal of materials within the fenced area. The fence/s shall be maintained intact until the completion of all demolition/building work on site.
Reason: To protect existing trees during the construction phase.
14. Tree protective fencing type galvanised mesh
The tree protection fencing shall be constructed of galvanised pipe at 2.4 metres spacing and connected by securely attached chain mesh fencing to a minimum height of 1.8 metres in height prior to work commencing.
Reason: To protect existing trees during construction phase.
15. Tree protection signage
Prior to works commencing, tree protection signage is to be attached to each tree protection zone, displayed in a prominent position and the sign repeated at 10 metres intervals or closer where the fence changes direction. Each sign shall contain in a clearly legible form, the following information:
Tree protection zone.
(i) This fence has been installed to prevent damage to the trees and their growing environment both above and below ground and access is restricted. (ii) Any encroachment not previously approved within the tree protection zone shall be the subject of an arborist's report. (iii) The arborist's report shall provide proof that no other alternative is available. (iv) The Arborist's report shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority for further consultation with Council. (v) The name, address, and telephone number of the developer.
Reason: To protect existing trees during the construction phase.
16. Tree protection mulching
Prior to works commencing and throughout construction, the area of the tree protection zone is to be mulched to a depth of 100mm with composted organic material being 75% Eucalyptus leaf litter and 25% wood.
Reason: To protect existing trees during the construction phase.
17. Tree protection - avoiding soil compaction
To preserve the following tree/s and avoid soil compaction, no work shall commence until temporary measures to avoid soil compaction (eg rumble boards) beneath the canopy of the following tree/s is/are installed if ANY vehicular access is required or repeated pedestrian access is necessary:
Reason: To protect existing trees during the construction phase.
18. Tree fencing inspection
Upon installation of the required tree protection measures, an inspection of the site by the Principal Certifying Authority is required to verify that tree protection measures comply with all relevant conditions.
Reason: To protect existing trees during the construction phase.
Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of the construction certificate:
19. Skylights
Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the skylights to living rooms shown on the architectural plans are to be amended to include the installation of summer shade protection and the skylight in the 2nd floor lobby is to be an operable/ventilated type with summer shade protection.
Reason: To ensure appropriate internal amenity.
20. Amendments to approved landscape plan
Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the approved landscape plans, listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, have been amended in accordance with the requirements of this condition as well as other conditions of this consent:
The above landscape plan(s) shall be amended in the following ways:
(i) The proposed stepping stone paths on each side of the development shall be continued and connected through the rear communal open space. (ii) The proposed side gates and fences between the building and side boundaries within the northern and southern side setbacks shall be deleted to ensure free access to the rear communal open space.
Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the landscape plan has been amended as required by this condition.
Note: An amended plan, prepared by a landscape architect or qualified landscape designer shall be submitted to the Certifying Authority.
Reason: To ensure adequate landscaping of the site.
21. Long service levy
In accordance with Section 109F(i) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act a Construction Certificate shall not be issued until any long service levy payable under Section 34 of the Building and Construction Industry Long Service Payments Act 1986 (or where such levy is payable by instalments, the first instalment of the levy) has been paid. Council is authorised to accept payment. Where payment has been made elsewhere, proof of payment is to be provided to Council.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
22. Builder’s indemnity insurance
The applicant, builder, developer or person who does the work on this development, must arrange builder’s indemnity insurance and submit the certificate of insurance in accordance with the requirements of Part 6 of the Home Building Act 1989 to the Certifying Authority for endorsement of the plans accompanying the Construction Certificate.
It is the responsibility of the applicant, builder or developer to arrange the builder's indemnity insurance for residential building work over the value of $20,000. The builder's indemnity insurance does not apply to commercial or industrial building work or to residential work valued at less than $20,000, nor to work undertaken by persons holding an owner/builder's permit issued by the Department of Fair Trading (unless the owner/builder's property is sold within 7 years of the commencement of the work).
Reason: Statutory requirement.
23. Outdoor lighting
Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that all outdoor lighting will comply with AS/NZ1158.3: 1999 Pedestrian Area (Category P) Lighting and AS4282: 1997 Control of the Obtrusive Effects of Outdoor Lighting.
Note: Details demonstrating compliance with these requirements are to be submitted prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate.
Reason: To provide high quality external lighting for security without adverse affects on public amenity from excessive illumination levels.
24. Air drying facilities
Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a common open space area dedicated for open air drying of clothes is provided. This area is to be located at ground level behind the building line and in a position not visible from the public domain.
In lieu of the above, written confirmation that all units will be provided with internal clothes drying facilities prior to the Occupation Certificate is to be submitted to the Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate.
Reason: Amenity & energy efficiency.
25. Access for people with disabilities (residential)
Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that access for people with disabilities to and from and between the public domain, residential units and all common open space areas is provided. Consideration must be given to the means of dignified and equitable access.
Compliant access provisions for people with disabilities shall be clearly shown on the plans submitted with the Construction Certificate. All details shall be provided to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate. All details shall be prepared in consideration of the Disability Discrimination Act, and the relevant provisions of AS1428.1, AS1428.2, AS1428.4 and AS 1735.12.
Reason: To ensure the provision of equitable and dignified access for all people in accordance with disability discrimination legislation and relevant Australian Standards.
26. Adaptable units
Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the nominated adaptable units within the development application, [Villa 4], are designed as adaptable housing in accordance with the provisions of Australian Standard AS4299-1995: Adaptable Housing.
Note: Evidence from an appropriately qualified professional demonstrating compliance with this control is to be submitted to and approved by the Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate.
Reason: Disabled access & amenity.
27. Location of plant (multi-dwelling developments)
Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that all plant and equipment (including but not limited to air conditioning equipment) is located within the basement.
C1. Note: Architectural plans identifying the location of all plant and equipment shall be provided to the Certifying Authority.
Reason: To minimise impact on surrounding properties, improved visual appearance and amenity for locality.
28. Driveway crossing levels
Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, driveway and associated footpath levels for any new, reconstructed or extended sections of driveway crossings between the property boundary and road alignment must be obtained from Ku-ring-gai Council. Such levels are only able to be issued by Council under the Roads Act 1993. All footpath crossings, laybacks and driveways are to be constructed according to Council's specifications "Construction of Gutter Crossings and Footpath Crossings".
Specifications are issued with alignment levels after completing the necessary application form at Customer Services and payment of the assessment fee. When completing the request for driveway levels application from Council, the applicant must attach a copy of the relevant development application drawing which indicates the position and proposed level of the proposed driveway at the boundary alignment.
This development consent is for works wholly within the property. Development consent does not imply approval of footpath or driveway levels, materials or location within the road reserve, regardless of whether this information is shown on the development application plans. The grading of such footpaths or driveways outside the property shall comply with Council's standard requirements. The suitability of the grade of such paths or driveways inside the property is the sole responsibility of the applicant and the required alignment levels fixed by Council may impact upon these levels.
The construction of footpaths and driveways outside the property in materials other than those approved by Council is not permitted.
Reason: To provide suitable vehicular access without disruption to pedestrian and vehicular traffic.
29. Driveway grades - basement carparks
Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, longitudinal driveway sections are to be prepared by a qualified civil/traffic engineer and be submitted for to and approved by the Certifying Authority. These profiles are to be at 1:100 scale along both edges of the proposed driveway, starting from the centreline of the frontage street carriageway to the proposed basement floor level. The traffic engineer shall provide specific written certification on the plans that:
· vehicular access can be obtained using grades of 20% (1 in 5) maximum and · all changes in grade (transitions) comply with Australian Standard 2890.1 -“Off-street car parking” (refer clause 2.5.3) to prevent the scraping of the underside of vehicles.
If a new driveway crossing is proposed, the longitudinal sections must incorporate the driveway crossing levels as issued by Council upon prior application.
Reason: To provide suitable vehicular access without disruption to pedestrian and vehicular traffic.
30. Basement car parking details
Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, certified parking layout plan(s) to scale showing all aspects of the vehicle access and accommodation arrangements must be submitted to and approved by the Certifying Authority. A qualified civil/traffic engineer must review the proposed vehicle access and accommodation layout and provide written certification on the plans that:
· all parking space dimensions, driveway and aisle widths, driveway grades, transitions, circulation ramps, blind aisle situations and other trafficked areas comply with Australian Standard 2890.1 - 2004 “Off-street car parking” · a clear height clearance of 2.6 metres (Volume C Part 3.4 of the Local Centres DCP for waste collection trucks) is provided over the designated garbage collection truck manoeuvring areas within the basement · no doors or gates are provided in the access driveways to the basement carpark which would prevent unrestricted access for internal garbage collection at any time from the basement garbage storage and collection area · the vehicle access and accommodation arrangements are to be constructed and marked in accordance with the certified plans
Reason: To ensure that parking spaces are in accordance with the approved development.
31. Energy Australia requirements
Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, the applicant must contact Energy Australia regarding power supply for the subject development. A written response detailing the full requirements of Energy Australia (including any need for underground cabling, substations or similar within or in the vicinity the development) shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority for approval prior to issue of the Construction Certificate.
Any structures or other requirements of Energy Australia shall be indicated on the plans issued with the Construction Certificate, to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority and Energy Australia. The requirements of Energy Australia must be met in full prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate.
Reason: To ensure compliance with the requirements of Energy Australia.
32. Utility provider requirements
Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, the applicant must make contact with all relevant utility providers whose services will be impacted upon by the development. A written copy of the requirements of each provider, as determined necessary by the Certifying Authority, must be obtained. All utility services or appropriate conduits for the same must be provided by the developer in accordance with the specifications of the utility providers.
Reason: To ensure compliance with the requirements of relevant utility providers.
33. Underground services
All electrical services (existing and proposed) shall be undergrounded from the proposed building on the site to the appropriate power pole(s) or other connection point. Undergrounding of services must not disturb the root system of existing trees and shall be undertaken in accordance with the requirements of the relevant service provided. Documentary evidence that the relevant service provider has been consulted and that their requirements have been met are to be provided to the Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate. All electrical and telephone services to the subject property must be placed underground and any redundant poles are to be removed at the expense of the applicant.
Reason: To provide infrastructure that facilitates the future improvement of the streetscape by relocation of overhead lines below ground.
Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of the construction certificate or prior to demolition, excavation or construction (whichever comes first):
34. Infrastructure damage security bond and inspection fee
To ensure that any damage to Council property as a result of construction activity is rectified in a timely matter:
(a) All work or activity undertaken pursuant to this development consent must be undertaken in a manner to avoid damage to Council property and must not jeopardise the safety of any person using or occupying the adjacent public areas.
(b) The applicant, builder, developer or any person acting in reliance on this consent shall be responsible for making good any damage to Council property and for the removal from Council property of any waste bin, building materials, sediment, silt, or any other material or article.
(c) The Infrastructure damage security bond and infrastructure inspection fee must be paid to Council by the applicant prior to both the issue of the Construction Certificate and the commencement of any earthworks or construction.
(d) In consideration of payment of the infrastructure damage security bond and infrastructure inspection fee, Council will undertake such inspections of Council Property as Council considers necessary and will also undertake, on behalf of the applicant, such restoration work to Council property, if any, that Council considers necessary as a consequence of the development. The provision of such restoration work by the Council does not absolve any person of the responsibilities contained in (a) to (b) above. Restoration work to be undertaken by Council referred to in this condition is limited to work that can be undertaken by Council at a cost of not more than the Infrastructure damage security bond payable pursuant to this condition.
(e) In this condition:
“Council property” includes any road, footway, footpath paving, kerbing, guttering, crossings, street furniture, seats, letter bins, trees, shrubs, lawns, mounds, bushland, and similar structures or features on any road or public road within the meaning of the Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) or any public place; and
“Infrastructure damage security bond and infrastructure inspection fee” means the Infrastructure damage security bond and infrastructure inspection fee as calculated in accordance with the Schedule of Fees & Charges adopted by Council as at the date of payment and the cost of any inspections required by the Council of Council property associated with this condition.
Reason: To maintain public infrastructure.
35. Section 94 Contributions - Centres.
This development is subject to a development contribution calculated in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010, being a s94 Contributions Plan in effect under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, as follows:
The contribution shall be paid to Council prior to the issue of any Construction Certificate, Linen Plan, Certificate of Subdivision or Occupation Certificate whichever comes first in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010.
The contributions specified above are subject to indexation and will continue to be indexed to reflect changes in the consumer price index and housing price index until they are paid in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 to reflect changes in the consumer price index and housing price index. Prior to payment, please contact Council directly to verify the current payable contributions.
Copies of Council’s Contribution Plans can be viewed at Council Chambers, 818 Pacific Hwy Gordon or on Council’s website at www.kmc.nsw.gov.au.
Reason: To ensure the provision, extension or augmentation of the Key Community Infrastructure identified in Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 that will, or is likely to be, required as a consequence of the development.
Conditions to be satisfied during the demolition, excavation and construction phases:
36. Road opening permit
The opening of any footway, roadway, road shoulder or any part of the road reserve shall not be carried out without a road opening permit being obtained from Council (upon payment of the required fee) beforehand.
Reason: Statutory requirement (Roads Act 1993 Section 138) and to maintain the integrity of Council’s infrastructure.
37. Prescribed conditions
The applicant shall comply with any relevant prescribed conditions of development consent under clause 98 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation. For the purposes of section 80A (11) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, the following conditions are prescribed in relation to a development consent for development that involves any building work:
(i) The work must be carried out in accordance with the requirements of the Building Code of Australia. (ii) In the case of residential building work for which the Home Building Act 1989 requires there to be a contract of insurance in force in accordance with Part 6 of that Act, that such a contract of insurance is in force before any works commence.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
38. Hours of work
Demolition, construction work and deliveries of building material and equipment must not take place outside the hours of 7.00am to 5.00pm Monday to Friday and 8.00am to 12 noon Saturday. No work and no deliveries are to take place on Sundays and public holidays.
Excavation using machinery must be limited to between 7.00am and 5.00pm Monday to Friday, with a respite break of 45 minutes between 12 noon and 1.00pm. No excavation using machinery is to occur on Saturdays, Sundays or public holidays.
Where it is necessary for works to occur outside of these hours (ie) placement of concrete for large floor areas on large residential/commercial developments or where building processes require the use of oversized trucks and/or cranes that are restricted by the RTA from travelling during daylight hours to deliver, erect or remove machinery, tower cranes, pre-cast panels, beams, tanks or service equipment to or from the site, approval for such activities will be subject to the issue of an "outside of hours works permit" from Council as well as notification of the surrounding properties likely to be affected by the proposed works.
Note: Failure to obtain a permit to work outside of the approved hours will result in on the spot fines being issued.
Reason: To ensure reasonable standards of amenity for occupants of neighbouring properties.
39. Approved plans to be on site
A copy of all approved and certified plans, specifications and documents incorporating conditions of consent and certification (including the Construction Certificate if required for the work) shall be kept on site at all times during the demolition, excavation and construction phases and must be readily available to any officer of Council or the Principal Certifying Authority.
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
40. Statement of compliance with Australian Standards
The demolition work shall comply with the provisions of Australian Standard AS2601: 2001 The Demolition of Structures. The work plans required by AS2601: 2001 shall be accompanied by a written statement from a suitably qualified person that the proposal contained in the work plan comply with the safety requirements of the Standard. The work plan and the statement of compliance shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the commencement of any works.
Reason: To ensure compliance with the Australian Standards.
41. Construction noise
During excavation, demolition and construction phases, noise generated from the site shall be controlled in accordance with the recommendations of the approved noise and vibration management plan.
Reason: To ensure reasonable standards of amenity to neighbouring properties.
42. Site notice
A site notice shall be erected on the site prior to any work commencing and shall be displayed throughout the works period. The site notice must:
· be prominently displayed at the boundaries of the site for the purposes of informing the public that unauthorised entry to the site is not permitted · display project details including, but not limited to the details of the builder, Principal Certifying Authority and structural engineer · be durable and weatherproof · display the approved hours of work, the name of the site/project manager, the responsible managing company (if any), its address and 24 hour contact phone number for any inquiries, including construction/noise complaint are to be displayed on the site notice · be mounted at eye level on the perimeter hoardings/fencing and is to state that unauthorised entry to the site is not permitted
Reason: To ensure public safety and public information.
43. Dust control
During excavation, demolition and construction, adequate measures shall be taken to prevent dust from affecting the amenity of the neighbourhood. The following measures must be adopted:
· physical barriers shall be erected at right angles to the prevailing wind direction or shall be placed around or over dust sources to prevent wind or activity from generating dust · earthworks and scheduling activities shall be managed to coincide with the next stage of development to minimise the amount of time the site is left cut or exposed · all materials shall be stored or stockpiled at the best locations · the ground surface should be dampened slightly to prevent dust from becoming airborne but should not be wet to the extent that run-off occurs · all vehicles carrying spoil or rubble to or from the site shall at all times be covered to prevent the escape of dust · all equipment wheels shall be washed before exiting the site using manual or automated sprayers and drive-through washing bays · gates shall be closed between vehicle movements and shall be fitted with shade cloth · cleaning of footpaths and roadways shall be carried out daily
Reason: To protect the environment and amenity of surrounding properties.
44. Post-construction dilapidation report
The applicant shall engage a suitably qualified person to prepare a post construction dilapidation report at the completion of the construction works. This report is to ascertain whether the construction works created any structural damage to adjoining buildings, infrastructure and roads. The report is to be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority. In ascertaining whether adverse structural damage has occurred to adjoining buildings, infrastructure and roads, the Principal Certifying Authority must:
· compare the post-construction dilapidation report with the pre-construction dilapidation report · have written confirmation from the relevant authority that there is no adverse structural damage to their infrastructure and roads.
A copy of this report is to be forwarded to Council at the completion of the construction works.
Reason: Management of records.
45. Compliance with submitted geotechnical report
A contractor with specialist excavation experience must undertake the excavations for the development and a suitably qualified and consulting geotechnical engineer must oversee excavation.
Geotechnical aspects of the development work, namely:
· appropriate excavation method and vibration control · support and retention of excavated faces · hydro-geological considerations
must be undertaken in accordance with the recommendations of the Geotechnical Investigation prepared by SMEC Testing Services Pty Ltd dated February 2014. Approval must be obtained from all affected property owners, including Ku-ring-gai Council, where rock anchors (both temporary and permanent) are proposed below adjoining property(ies).
Reason: To ensure the safety and protection of property.
46. Use of road or footpath
During excavation, demolition and construction phases, no building materials, plant or the like are to be stored on the road or footpath without written approval being obtained from Council beforehand. The pathway shall be kept in a clean, tidy and safe condition during building operations. Council reserves the right, without notice, to rectify any such breach and to charge the cost against the applicant/owner/builder, as the case may be.
Reason: To ensure safety and amenity of the area.
47. Guarding excavations
All excavation, demolition and construction works shall be properly guarded and protected with hoardings or fencing to prevent them from being dangerous to life and property.
Reason: To ensure public safety.
48. Toilet facilities
During excavation, demolition and construction phases, toilet facilities are to be provided, on the work site, at the rate of one toilet for every 20 persons or part of 20 persons employed at the site.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
49. Protection of public places
If the work involved in the erection, demolition or construction of the development is likely to cause pedestrian or vehicular traffic in a public place to be obstructed or rendered inconvenient, or building involves the enclosure of a public place, a hoarding or fence must be erected between the work site and the public place.
If necessary, a hoarding is to be erected, sufficient to prevent any substance from, or in connection with, the work falling into the public place.
The work site must be kept lit between sunset and sunrise if it is likely to be hazardous to persons in the public place.
Any hoarding, fence or awning is to be removed when the work has been completed.
Reason: To protect public places.
50. Recycling of building material (general)
During demolition and construction, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that building materials suitable for recycling have been forwarded to an appropriate registered business dealing in recycling of materials. Materials to be recycled must be kept in good order.
Reason: To facilitate recycling of materials.
51. Construction signage
All construction signs must comply with the following requirements:
· are not to cover any mechanical ventilation inlet or outlet vent · are not illuminated, self-illuminated or flashing at any time · are located wholly within a property where construction is being undertaken · refer only to the business(es) undertaking the construction and/or the site at which the construction is being undertaken · are restricted to one such sign per property · do not exceed 2.5m2 · are removed within 14 days of the completion of all construction works
Reason: To ensure compliance with Council's controls regarding signage.
52. Maintenance period for works in public road
A maintenance period of six (6) months applies to all work in the public road reserve carried out by the applicant - after the works have been completed to the satisfaction of Ku-ring-gai Council. In that maintenance period, the applicant shall be liable for any section of the public infrastructure work which fails to perform in the designed manner, or as would reasonably be expected under the operating conditions. The maintenance period shall commence once the applicant receives a formal letter from Council stating that the works involving public infrastructure have been completed satisfactorily. Reason: To protect public infrastructure.
53. Road reserve safety
All public footways and roadways fronting and adjacent to the site must be maintained in a safe condition at all times during the course of the development works. Construction materials must not be stored in the road reserve. A safe pedestrian circulation route and a pavement/route free of trip hazards must be maintained at all times on or adjacent to any public access ways fronting the construction site. Where public infrastructure is damaged, repair works must be carried out when and as directed by Council officers. Where pedestrian circulation is diverted on to the roadway or verge areas, clear directional signage and protective barricades must be installed in accordance with AS1742-3 (1996) “Traffic Control Devices for Work on Roads”. If pedestrian circulation is not satisfactorily maintained across the site frontage, and action is not taken promptly to rectify the defects, Council may undertake proceedings to stop work.
Reason: To ensure safe public footways and roadways during construction.
54. Services
Where required, the adjustment or inclusion of any new utility service facilities must be carried out by the applicant and in accordance with the requirements of the relevant utility authority. These works shall be at no cost to Council. It is the applicants’ full responsibility to make contact with the relevant utility authorities to ascertain the impacts of the proposal upon utility services (including water, phone, gas and the like). Council accepts no responsibility for any matter arising from its approval to this application involving any influence upon utility services provided by another authority.
Reason: Provision of utility services.
55. Erosion control
Temporary sediment and erosion control and measures are to be installed prior to the commencement of any works on the site. These measures must be maintained in working order during construction works up to completion. All sediment traps must be cleared on a regular basis and after each major storm and/or as directed by the Principal Certifying Authority and Council officers.
Reason: To protect the environment from erosion and sedimentation.
56. Drainage to interallotment easement
Stormwater runoff from all new impervious areas and subsoil drainage systems shall be piped and connected to the interallotment stormwater drainage line benefiting the site. The interallotment line must be covered by the necessary easement for drainage which may exist or need to be created under this consent.
Reason: To protect the environment.
57. Sydney Water Section 73 Compliance Certificate
The applicant must obtain a Section 73 Compliance Certificate under the Sydney Water Act 1994. An application must be made through an authorised Water Servicing CoOrdinator. The applicant is to refer to “Your Business” section of Sydney Water’s web site at www.sydneywater.com.au then the “e-develop” icon or telephone 13 20 92. Following application a “Notice of Requirements” will detail water and sewer extensions to be built and charges to be paid. Please make early contact with the CoOrdinator, since building of water/sewer extensions can be time consuming and may impact on other services and building, driveway or landscape design.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
58. Arborist’s report
The tree/s to be retained shall be inspected, monitored and treated by a qualified Arborist during and after completion of development works to ensure their long term survival. Regular inspections and documentation from the Arborist to the Principal Certifying Authority are required at the following times or phases of work:
Reason: To ensure protection of existing trees.
59. Treatment of tree roots
If tree roots are severed for the purposes of constructing the approved works, they shall be cut cleanly by hand, by an experienced AQF3 Arborist/Horticulturist. All pruning works shall be undertaken as specified in Australian Standard 4373-2007 - Pruning of Amenity Trees.
Reason: To protect existing trees.
60. Cutting of tree roots
No tree roots of 30mm or greater in diameter located within the specified radius of the trunk/s of the following tree/s shall be severed or injured in the process of any works during the construction period. All pruning works shall be undertaken as specified in Australian Standard 4373-2007 - Pruning of Amenity Trees:
Reason: To protect existing trees.
61. Approved tree works
Approval is given for the following works to be undertaken to trees on the site:
Removal or pruning of any other tree on the site is not approved, excluding species exempt under Council’s Tree Preservation Order.
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
62. Hand excavation
All excavation within the specified radius of the trunk/s of the following tree/s shall be hand dug:
Reason: To protect existing trees.
63. Thrust boring/directional drilling
Excavation for the installation of any services within the specified distance of the trunk/s of the following tree/s shall utilise the thrust boring method. Thrust boring shall be carried out at least 600mm beneath natural ground level to minimise damage to tree/s root system:
Reason: To protect existing trees.
64. No storage of materials beneath trees
No activities, storage or disposal of materials shall take place beneath the canopy of any tree protected under Council's Tree Preservation Order at any time.
Reason: To protect existing trees.
65. Removal of refuse
All builders' refuse, spoil and/or material unsuitable for use in landscape areas shall be removed from the site on completion of the building works.
Reason: To protect the environment.
66. Canopy replenishment trees to be planted
The canopy replenishment trees to be planted shall be maintained in a healthy and vigorous condition until they attain a height of 5.0 metres whereby they will be protected by Council’s Tree Preservation Order. Any of the trees found faulty, damaged, dying or dead shall be replaced with the same species.
Reason: To maintain the treed character of the area.
67. Survey and inspection of waste collection clearance and path of travel
At the stage when formwork for the ground floor slab is in place and prior to concrete being poured, a registered surveyor is to:
· ascertain the reduced level of the underside of the slab at the driveway entry, · certify that the level is not lower than the level shown on the approved DA plans; and · certify that the minimum headroom of 2.6 metres will be available for the full path of travel of the small waste collection vehicle from the street to the collection area. · This certification is to be provided to Council’s Development Engineer prior to any concrete being poured for the ground floor slab. · No work is to proceed until Council has undertaken an inspection to determine clearance and path of travel.
At the stage when formwork for the ground floor slab is in place and prior to concrete being poured, Council’s Development Engineer and Manager Waste Services are to carry out an inspection of the site to confirm the clearance available for the full path of travel of the small waste collection vehicle from the street to the collection area. This inspection may not be carried out by a private certifier because waste management is not a matter listed in Clause 161 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000.
Reason: To ensure access will be available for Council’s contractors to collect waste from the collection point.
68. On site retention of waste dockets
All demolition, excavation and construction waste dockets are to be retained on site, or at suitable location, in order to confirm which facility received materials generated from the site for recycling or disposal.
(i) Each docket is to be an official receipt from a facility authorised to accept the material type, for disposal or processing. (ii) This information is to be made available at the request of an Authorised Officer of Council.
Reason: To protect the environment.
Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate:
69. Easement for waste collection
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, an easement for waste collection is to be created under Section 88B of the Conveyancing Act 1919. This is to permit legal access for Council, Council’s contractors and their vehicles over the subject property for the purpose of collecting waste from the property. The terms of the easement are to be generally in accordance with Council’s draft terms for an easement for waste collection and shall be to the satisfaction of Council’s Development Engineer.
Reason: To permit legal access for Council, Council’s contractors and their vehicles over the subject site for waste collection.
70. Golf buggy trailer storage
Prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that the "golf buggy trailer storage" areas notated on the plans are included in the titling of the dwellings to ensure that the future use is as described and cannot be used for the parking of motor vehicles.
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination. 71. Private open space
Prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that the line of the private open space to Villas 1 and 2, defined by a fence at lawn level, is included in the titling of the dwellings.
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
72. Provision of copy of OSD designs if Council is not the PCA
Prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate, the following must be provided to Council’s Development Engineer:
(i) A copy of the approved Construction Certificate stormwater detention/retention design for the site (ii) A copy of any works-as-executed drawings required by this consent (iii) The Engineer’s certification of the as-built system.
Reason: For Council to maintain its database of as-constructed on-site stormwater detention systems.
73. Compliance with BASIX Certificate
Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that all commitments listed in BASIX Certificate No. 736371M and dated 15 June 2016 have been complied with.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
74. Completion of landscape works
Prior to the release of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that all landscape works, including the removal of all noxious and/or environmental weed species, have been undertaken in accordance with the approved plan(s) and conditions of consent.
Reason: To ensure that the landscape works are consistent with the development consent.
75. Retention and re-use positive covenant
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the applicant must create a positive covenant and restriction on the use of land under Section 88E of the Conveyancing Act 1919, burdening the property with the requirement to maintain the site stormwater retention and re-use facilities on the property.
The terms of the instruments are to be generally in accordance with the Council's "draft terms of Section 88B instruments for protection of retention and re-use facilities" and to the satisfaction of Council (refer to Council’s Local Centres DCP Volume C Part4R.9). For existing titles, the positive covenant and the restriction on the use of land is to be created through an application to the Land Titles Office in the form of a request using forms 13PC and 13RPA. The relative location of the reuse and retention facility, in relation to the building footprint, must be shown on a scale sketch, attached as an annexure to the request forms.
Registered title documents showing the covenants and restrictions must be submitted to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate.
Reason: To protect the environment.
76. Certification of drainage works
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that:
· the stormwater drainage works have been satisfactorily completed in accordance with the approved Construction Certificate drainage plans · the minimum retention and on-site detention storage volume requirements of BASIX and Council’s Local Centres DCP Volume C Part 4B.5 respectively, have been achieved · retained water is connected and available for use · basement and subsoil areas are able to drain via a pump/sump system installed in accordance with AS3500.3 and Council’s Local Centres DCP Volume C Part 4R.6 · all grates potentially accessible by children are secured · components of the new drainage system have been installed by a licensed plumbing contractor in accordance with the Plumbing and Drainage Code AS3500.3 2003 and the Building Code of Australia · all enclosed floor areas, including habitable and garage floor levels, are safeguarded from outside stormwater runoff ingress by suitable differences in finished levels, gradings and provision of stormwater collection devices
Note: Evidence from a qualified and experienced consulting civil/hydraulic engineer documenting compliance with the above is to be provided to Council prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate.
Reason: To protect the environment.
77. WAE plans for stormwater management and disposal (dual occupancy and above)
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, a registered surveyor must provide a works as executed survey of the completed stormwater drainage and management systems. The survey must be submitted to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate. The survey must indicate:
· as built (reduced) surface and invert levels for all drainage pits · gradients of drainage lines, materials and dimensions · as built (reduced) level(s) at the approved point of discharge to the public drainage system · as built location and internal dimensions of all detention and retention structures on the property (in plan view) and horizontal distances to nearest adjacent boundaries and structures on site · the achieved storage volumes of the installed retention and detention storages and derivative calculations · as built locations of all access pits and grates in the detention and retention system(s), including dimensions · the size of the orifice or control fitted to any on-site detention system · dimensions of the discharge control pit and access grates · the maximum depth of storage possible over the outlet control · top water levels of storage areas and indicative RL’s through the overland flow path in the event of blockage of the on-site detention system
The works as executed plan(s) must show the as built details above in comparison to those shown on the drainage plans approved with the Construction Certificate prior to commencement of works. All relevant levels and details indicated must be marked in red on a copy of the Principal Certifying Authority stamped construction certificate stormwater plans.
Reason: To protect the environment.
78. Basement pump-out maintenance
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a maintenance regime has been prepared for the basement stormwater pump-out system.
Note: A maintenance regime specifying that the system is to be regularly inspected and checked by qualified practitioners is to be prepared by a suitable qualified professional and provided to the Principal Certifying Authority.
Reason: To protect the environment.
79. OSD positive covenant/restriction
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the applicant must create a positive covenant and restriction on the use of land under Section 88E of the Conveyancing Act 1919, burdening the owner with the requirement to maintain the on-site stormwater detention facilities on the lot.
The terms of the instruments are to be generally in accordance with the Council's "draft terms of Section 88B instrument for protection of on-site detention facilities" and to the satisfaction of Council (refer to Council’s Local Centres DCP Volume C Part4R.9). For existing titles, the positive covenant and the restriction on the use of land is to be created through an application to the Land Titles Office in the form of a request using forms 13PC and 13RPA. The relative location of the on-site detention facility, in relation to the building footprint, must be shown on a scale sketch, attached as an annexure to the request forms.
Registered title documents, showing the covenants and restrictions, must be submitted and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate.
Reason: To protect the environment.
80. Easement drainage line construction
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the required interallotment drainage system has been installed and surveyed under the supervision of a designing engineer or equivalent professional.
Note: At the completion of the interallotment works, the following must be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority for approval:
· details from the supervising engineer that that the as-constructed works comply with the approved interallotment design documentation · a full works as executed drawing of the as built interallotment drainage line (dimensions, grades, materials, invert levels) prepared by a registered surveyor, and details from the surveyor that all drainage structures are wholly contained within existing drainage easement(s)
Reason: To protect the environment.
81. Sydney Water Section 73 Compliance Certificate
Prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate the Section 73 Sydney water Compliance Certificate must be obtained and submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority
Reason: Statutory requirement.
82. Certification of as-constructed driveway/carpark - RFB
Prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that:
· the as-constructed car park complies with the approved Construction Certificate plans · the completed vehicle access and accommodation arrangements comply with Australian Standard 2890.1 - 2004 “Off-Street car parking" and the Seniors Living State Environment Planning Policy in terms of minimum parking space dimensions · the temporary service / car wash space is signposted · finished driveway gradients and transitions will not result in the scraping of the underside of cars · no doors, gates, grilles or other structures have been provided in the access driveways to the basement carpark, which would prevent unrestricted access for internal garbage collection from the basement garbage storage and collection area · the vehicular headroom requirements of: - Australian Standard 2890.1 - “Off-street car parking”, - 2.6 metres height clearance for waste collection trucks are met from the public street into and within the applicable areas of the basement carpark.
Note: Evidence from a suitably qualified and experienced traffic/civil engineer indicating compliance with the above is to be provided to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate.
Reason: To ensure that vehicular access and accommodation areas are compliant with the consent.
83. Reinstatement of redundant crossings and completion of infrastructure works
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority must be satisfied that he or she has received a signed inspection form from Council which states that the following works in the road reserve have been completed:
· new concrete driveway crossing in accordance with levels and specifications issued by Council · removal of all redundant driveway crossings and kerb laybacks (or sections thereof) and reinstatement of these areas to footpath, turfed verge and upright kerb and gutter (reinstatement works to match surrounding adjacent infrastructure with respect to integration of levels and materials) · full repair and resealing of any road surface damaged during construction · full replacement of damaged sections of grass verge to match existing
This inspection may not be carried out by the Private Certifier because restoration of Council property outside the boundary of the site is not a matter listed in Clause 161 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000.
All works must be completed in accordance with the General Specification for the Construction of Road and Drainage Works in Ku-ring-gai Council, dated November 2004. The Occupation Certificate must not be issued until all damaged public infrastructure caused as a result of construction works on the subject site (including damage caused by, but not limited to, delivery vehicles, waste collection, contractors, sub-contractors, concrete vehicles) is fully repaired to the satisfaction of Council. Repair works shall be at no cost to Council.
Reason: To protect the streetscape.
84. Infrastructure repair
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority must be satisfied that any damaged public infrastructure caused as a result of construction works (including damage caused by, but not limited to, delivery vehicles, waste collection, contractors, sub-contractors, concrete vehicles) is fully repaired to the satisfaction of Council Development Engineer and at no cost to Council.
Reason: To protect public infrastructure.
85. Fire safety certificate
Prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a Fire Safety Certificate for all the essential fire or other safety measures forming part of this consent has been completed and provided to Council.
Note: A copy of the Fire Safety Certificate must be submitted to Council.
Reason: To ensure suitable fire safety measures are in place.
Conditions to be satisfied at all times:
86. Outdoor lighting
At all times for the life of the approved development, all outdoor lighting shall not detrimentally impact upon the amenity of other premises and adjacent dwellings and shall comply with, where relevant, AS/NZ1158.3: 2005 Pedestrian Area (Category P) Lighting and AS4282: 1997 Control of the Obtrusive Effects of Outdoor Lighting.
Reason: To protect the amenity of surrounding properties.
87. Annual Fire Safety Statement
Each 12 months after the installation of essential fire or other safety measures, the owner of a building must cause the Council to be given an Annual Fire Safety Statement for the building. In addition a copy of the statement must be given to the NSW Fire Commissioner and a copy displayed prominently in the building.
Reason: To ensure statutory maintenance of essential fire safety measures.
For the Resolution: The Mayor, Councillor Anderson, Councillors Citer, McDonald, Pettett, Malicki and Fornari-Orsmond
Against the Resolution: Councillors Berlioz and Szatow |
Councillor Fornari-Orsmond left the meeting
Councillor Ossip arrived
95 |
Consideration of Submissions - Planning Proposal for Areas Deferred from the KLEP 2015
File: S11313 Vide: GB.6
|
|
For Council to consider the submissions received in response to the exhibition of the Planning Proposal for areas deferred from the KLEP 2015.
The following members of the public addressed Council on this item:
F Martin M Boldvan W Knowles J Martyn R Martyn P Carlson D White C Chiu A Gatome
|
|
Resolved:
(Moved: Councillors Malicki/Berlioz)
A. That Council adopts the Planning Proposal for Areas Deferred from the Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan 2015 subject to the following amendments:
i. maps be amended to remove the development standards from the following properties: a. 420 Bobbin Head Road, North Turramurra – Lot 102 DP1134640 – remove HOB and FSR; b. 22 St Columbans Green, North Turramurra – Lot 101 DP1134640 – remove HOB and FSR; c. 410-412 Bobbin Head Road, North Turramurra – Lots 1-7 DP211722 and Lot 3 DP506214 – remove HOB and FSR; d. 61 Miowera Road, North Turramurra – Part of Lot 323 DP752031 – remove HOB; e. 118A Koola Avenue, East Killara – Lot 17 DP241746 – remove HOB, FSR and LSZ. ii. the Minimum Lot Size map be amended to include mapping of U2 – 1500 over Lot 1 DP585454. iii. Lot A DP386703 (part of Killara High School) be amended to SP2 Educational Establishment zoning, consistent with the zoning applying to the rest of the school site.
B. That the Planning Proposal be submitted to the Department of Planning and Environment in accordance with Section 59 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, and the Greater Sydney Commission be requested to make the plan
C. That those who made submissions be notified of Council’s decision.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
The above Motion was subject to an Amendment
(Moved: Councillor Szatow)
That East Killara, with the exception of those properties that are different, be rezoned to E3 instead of E4.
The Amendment lapsed for want of a Seconder.
A new Motion was proposed:
(Moved: Councillor Citer)
That the Council corresponds with Fire and Rescue NSW as to the planning proposal for the KLEP, and that Council receive a response before consideration of this proposal.
The new Motion lapsed for want of a Seconder
The Original Motion was:
(Moved: Councillors Citer/Malicki)
A. That Council adopts the Planning Proposal for Areas Deferred from the Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan 2015 subject to the following amendments:
i. maps be amended to remove the development standards from the following properties: a. 420 Bobbin Head Road, North Turramurra – Lot 102 DP1134640 – remove HOB and FSR; b. 22 St Columbans Green, North Turramurra – Lot 101 DP1134640 – remove HOB and FSR; c. 410-412 Bobbin Head Road, North Turramurra – Lots 1-7 DP211722 and Lot 3 DP506214 – remove HOB and FSR; d. 61 Miowera Road, North Turramurra – Part of Lot 323 DP752031 – remove HOB; e. 118A Koola Avenue, East Killara – Lot 17 DP241746 – remove HOB, FSR and LSZ. ii. the Minimum Lot Size map be amended to include mapping of U2 – 1500 over Lot 1 DP585454. iii. Lot A DP386703 (part of Killara High School) be amended to SP2 Educational Establishment zoning, consistent with the zoning applying to the rest of the school site.
B. That the Planning Proposal be submitted to the Department of Planning and Environment in accordance with Section 59 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, and the Greater Sydney Commission be requested to make the plan
C. That those who made submissions be notified of Council’s decision.
The above original Motion was withdrawn by Councillor Citer.
|
Motions of which due Notice has been given
96 |
Stanhope Road Killara - "Avenue of Trees"
File: S05318/10 Vide: NM.1
|
|
Notice of Motion from Councillor Szatow dated 24 April 2017 Council support the nomination of Stanhope Road Killara’s “Avenue of Trees” for inclusion on the National Trust Register of Significant Trees.
The nomination has been made by concerned residents who value this unparalleled street canopy, a defining element of Killara – one of Australia’s finest early 1900’s Federation and Garden Suburbs.
The avenue of trees contributes significantly to this Heritage Conservation Area and the combined effect of the figs and brushbox is a unique aesthetic that is not seen to this level of maturity elsewhere. Together they create a 325 metre long green street canopy and combine with the adjacent heritage federation homes to create an iconic spectacle. A 1943 aerial view of Stanhope Road reveals these plantings showing some canopy cover, indicating an earlier planting. A conservative estimate would place these trees as being some 80 years old.
Moreover the trees are in danger of decimation, owing largely, although not entirely, to the excessive pruning by Ausgrid which has caused significant changes to their growth patterns. Residents have been alarmed at the letters they have received from Council, which have stated that trees need to be removed. Residents are very concerned that these trees do not appear to be protected by a TPO or the fact they are in a Heritage Conservation Area, and there has been no arborist report to show the trees are dangerous.
By supporting this Motion, Council ensures that The National Trust’s Significant Trees Committee can assess the trees against nationally agreed criteria. The nomination, if successful, will ensure that Ausgrid (monitored by Council) and Council itself have a plan of management to ensure their long term survival.
To date, approximately 20% of these trees have been lost and Stanhope Road cannot afford to lose any more or this iconic “Tree Avenue” will cease to exist.
We have lost so many of our important trees which have been removed to make way for developments, that it would be a tragedy not to move to protect this grand formal avenue which is Stanhope Road - home to no fewer than nine individually listed heritage homes – where street trees and architecture complement one another in such an aesthetically pleasing way.
The following member of the public addressed Council on this item:
A Sweeny
|
|
Resolved:
(Moved: Councillors Szatow/McDonald)
A. That Council supports a nomination by the residents to the National Trust of this avenue of trees between the Pacific Highway and Culworth Avenue Killara.
B. That an arborists report, detailing in particular whether the trees at 19a and 13 Stanhope Road Killara can be saved, come back to council within one month.
C. That a report on the merits of recommending significant trees in the Ku-ring-gai area to the National Trust for the tree register be provided.
D. That a report on the costs of aerial bundling in Stanhope Road Killara (or part thereof) be brought back to Council.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY |
BUSINESS WITHOUT NOTICE - SUBJECT TO CLAUSE 241 OF GENERAL REGULATIONS
97 |
Child-Care Centre at 24 Bayswater Road Lindfield
File: DA0346/16 Vide: BN.1
|
|
Councillor D Citer drew Council’s attention to consideration of urgency for a matter pertaining to the development of a childcare centre at 24 Bayswater Road Lindfield which is currently before the Land and Environment Court.
He believed there are reasons whereby it should be addressed urgently.
|
|
Resolved:
A Motion moved by Councillor Citer to have the matter dealt with at the meeting was LOST
For the Urgency: Councillor Citer
Against the Urgency: The Mayor, Councillor Anderson, Councillors, McDonald, Pettett, Malicki, Berlioz, Szatow, and Ossip
The Mayor, Councillor Jennifer Anderson ruled against urgency.
|
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
98 |
Better traffic management Boomerang Street/Brentwood Avenue/Turramurra Avenue intersection
File: TM10/01 Vide: QN.1
|
|
Question Without Notice from Councillor Duncan McDonald.
|
|
Has the Traffic Committee now included the analysis of the intersection of Boomerang Street/Brentwood Avenue/Turramurra Avenue for a better traffic management system?
Answered by Director Operations
Director Operations advised he would take the question on notice. |
99 |
Process for objectors and staff to meet regarding DA0346/16 Childcare Centre Bayswater Road Lindfield
File: DA0346/16 Vide: QN.2
|
|
Question Without Notice from Councillor Christiane Berlioz
|
|
Resolved:
(What is the process for the objectors to the Bayswater Road Childcare Centre DA0346/16 to obtain a meeting with staff to discuss their points of contention before the next Council meeting?
Answered by Corporate Lawyer
The Corporate Lawyer advised there have been submissions received from residents in relation to the original and amended proposal. There have been meetings between Council representatives and the residents and their representatives on more than one occasion in these proceedings.
Utility of a further meeting is perhaps not clear, we haven’t been provided with any explanation of the purpose for which a meeting is sought.
Councillor Berlioz
The purpose would be to discuss their points of contention with a view to understanding better whether Council can take some of these points on or not, or to discuss the whole matter with Council to find out where they stand with regards to points of contention they referred to in their speeches to Council earlier today.
|
100 |
Reimbursement of Court Costs relating to Council Mergers
File: S09638 Vide: QN.3
|
|
Question Without Notice from Councillor Christiane Berlioz
|
|
What is the process and expected timeframe for reimbursement of court costs resulting from Council’s successful appeal in the Supreme Court against mergers?
Answered by Corporate Lawyer
The Corporate Lawyer advised we have recently passed the time for which any application can be made to the High Court. But, we have this week written to the Crown with some information as to what our costs incurred have been and I anticipate there will be some discussion and correspondence with the Crown seeking to agree on the amount of costs.
If the agreement isn’t successful then the Court has a costs assessments process that can determine the amount of costs and that can take some time. So it is preferable to seek agreement initially and the timeframe is a bit hard to say.
|
101 |
Timeframe for Lodging an Appeal against the Aged Care Facility in Bushlands Avenue
File: DA0418/15 Vide: QN.4
|
|
Question Without Notice from Councillor David Citer
|
|
Would there be time for Council to lodge a submission on the development for the aged persons housing that is currently before the Northern Regional Planning Panel for Bushlands Avenue Gordon?
Answered by Director Development and Regulation
The Director Development and Regulation advised timeframe for submissions has long gone. In terms of what our DCP describes, however, that does not necessarily preclude Council from making a late submission.
|
The Meeting closed at 9.23 pm
The Minutes of the Ordinary Meeting of Council held on 2 May 2017 (Pages 1 - 4) were confirmed as a full and accurate record of proceedings on 23 May 2017.
__________________________ __________________________
General Manager Mayor / Chairperson
Ordinary Meeting of Council - 23 May 2017 |
GB.1 / 84 |
|
|
Item GB.1 |
S05273 |
|
8 May 2017 |
Investment Report as at 30 April 2017
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Purpose of Report
To present Council’s investment portfolio performance for April 2017.
Background
Council’s investments are reported monthly to Council in accordance with the Local Government Act 1993, the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 and Council’s Investment Policy.
Comments
Investment Portfolio Performance Snapshot
The table below provides the investments portfolio performance against targets identified in Council’s Investment Policy as well as other key performance indicators based on industry benchmarks.
Cumulative Investment Returns against Revised Budget
The net return on investments for the month of April 2017 was $3,732,000 against a revised budget of $3,467,000 giving a YTD favourable variance of $265,000.
The total return on investments for the month of April is provided below.
A comparison of the cumulative investment returns against year to date revised budget is shown in the Chart below.
Cash Flow and Investment Movements
Council’s total cash and investment portfolio at the end of April 2017 was $137,961,000, compared to $141,880,000 at the end of February 2017, a net cash outflow of $3,919,000. The cash outflow was mainly due to creditors payments.
Three investments have matured, and there were two new investments made during the month of April 2017.
Investment Performance against Industry Benchmarks
Overall during the month of April the investment performance was well above the industry benchmark.
The benchmark is specific to the type of investment and the details are provided below.
· AusBond Bank Bill Index is used for all Council’s investments
Table 1 - Investments Performance against Industry Benchmarks
Table 2 below provides a summary of all investments by type and performance during the month.
Attachment A1 provides definitions in relation to different types of investments.
Table 2 - Investments Portfolio Summary during April 2017
Investment by Credit rating and Maturity Profile
The allocation of Council’s investments by credit rating and the maturity profile are shown below:
integrated planning and reporting
Leadership & Governance
Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective |
Delivery Program Term Achievement |
Operational Plan Task |
L2.1 Council rigorously manages its financial resources and assets to maximise delivery of services |
Council maintains and improves its long term financial position and performance |
Continue to analyse opportunities to expand the revenue base of Council |
Governance Matters
Council’s investments are made in accordance with the Local Government Act (1993), the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 and Council’s Investment Policy.
Section 212 of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 states:
(1) The responsible accounting officer of a council:
(a) must provide the council with a written report (setting out details of all money that the council has invested under section 625 of the Act) to be presented:
(i) if only one ordinary meeting of the council is held in a month, at that meeting, or
(ii) if more than one such meeting is held in a month, at whichever of those meetings the council by resolution determines, and
(b) must include in the report a certificate as to whether or not the investment has been made in accordance with the Act, the regulations and the council’s investment policies.
(2) The report must be made up to the last day of the month immediately preceding the meeting.
Risk Management
Council manages the risk associated with investments by diversifying the types of investment, credit quality, counterparty exposure and term to maturity profile.
Council invests its funds in accordance with The Ministerial Investment Order.
All investments are made with consideration of advice from Council’s appointed investment advisor, CPG Research & Advisory.
Financial Considerations
The revised budget for interest on investments for the financial year 2016/2017 is $4,080,900. Of this amount approximately $2,454,000 is restricted for the benefit of future expenditure relating to development contributions, $555,800 transferred to the internally restricted Infrastructure & Facility Reserve, and the remainder of $1,071,100 is available for operations.
Social Considerations
Not applicable.
Environmental Considerations
Not applicable.
Community Consultation
None undertaken or required.
Internal Consultation
None undertaken or required.
Certification - Responsible Accounting Officer
I hereby certify that the investments listed in the attached report have been made in accordance with Section 625 of the Local Government Act 1993, clause 212 of the Local Government General Regulation 2005 and Council’s Investment Policy.
Summary
As at 30 April 2017:
· Council’s total cash and investment portfolio is $137,961,000.
· The net return on investments for the financial year to April 2017 was $3,732,000 against a revised budget of $3,467,000, giving a YTD favourable variance of $265,000.
A. That the summary of investments and performance for April 2017 be received and noted.
B. That the Certificate of the Responsible Accounting Officer be noted and the report adopted.
|
Tony Ly Financial Accounting Officer |
Angela Apostol Manager Finance |
David Marshall Director Corporate |
|
A1 |
Investments definitions specific to Council’s investment portfolio |
|
2016/124274 |
Ordinary Meeting of Council - 23 May 2017 |
GB.2 / 92 |
|
|
Item GB.2 |
S05273 |
|
10 May 2017 |
Analysis of Land and Environment Court Costs - 3rd Quarter 2016 to 2017
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
purpose of report: |
To report legal costs in relation to development control matters in the Land and Environment Court for the quarter ended 31 March 2017. |
|
|
background: |
A person may commence proceedings in the Land and Environment Court in relation to a development application which has either been refused by Council or is deemed to have been refused. An appeal may also be commenced in relation to conditions of development consent and the issue of building certificates and orders |
|
|
comments: |
For the nine months ended 31 March 2017, Council’s legal and associated payments in relation to the Land and Environment Court were $685,204. This compares with the annual budget of $1,063,600. |
|
|
recommendation: |
That the analysis of Land and Environment Court costs for the quarter ended 31 March 2017 be received and noted. |
Purpose of Report
To report legal costs in relation to development control matters in the Land and Environment Court for the quarter ended 31 March 2017.
Background
A person may commence proceedings in the Land and Environment Court in relation to a development application which has either been refused by Council or is deemed to have been refused (a development application is deemed to have been refused if it has not been determined within a period of 40 days or such longer period that may be calculated in accordance with the Act). An appeal may also be commenced in relation to conditions of development consent and the issue of building certificates and orders. Council is a respondent to such proceedings.
Comments
Appeals Lodged
In quarter ended 31 March 2017, there were nine new appeals lodged with the Land and Environment Court. The number of appeals received in prior years is as follows:
Financial year |
Number of appeals received (whole year) |
2012/2013 |
25 |
2013/2014 |
16 |
2014/2015 |
31 |
2015/2016 |
38 |
2016/2017 (as at 31 Mar 2017) |
33 |
The appeals commenced during the three months to 31 March 2017 concerned the following subject matters:
· residential apartment buildings
· town houses
· seniors living
· new dwelling
· additions and alterations
· modification of existing development consent
costs
For the quarter ended 31 March 2017, Council made payments of $285,681 on appeals and associated expenses in relation to Land & Environment Court matters. This comes to a total of $685,204 for the three quarters of 2016/2017. This compares with the annual budget of $1,063,600.
In addition to expenditure on appeals, a further amount of $32,380 was spent in obtaining expert advice regarding development assessment matters.
Land & Environment Court Costs 2013/2014 - 2016/2017 |
|||||
Financial Year |
Total Costs |
1st quarter September |
2nd quarter December |
3rd quarter March |
4th quarter June |
2013/2014* (16 appeals lodged) |
$481,043 |
$42,412 |
$124,001 |
$104,095 |
$210,535 |
2014/2015* (31 appeals lodged) |
$1,153,612 |
$186,803 |
$407,603 |
$194,103 |
$365,103 |
Financial Year |
Total Costs |
1st quarter September |
2nd quarter December |
3rd quarter March |
4th quarter June |
2015/2016 (38 appeals lodged) |
$1,256,887 |
$264,263 |
$290,099 |
$303,122 |
$399,403 |
2016/2017 (33 appeals lodged) |
$685,204 |
$202,574 |
$196,949 |
$285,681 |
N/A |
* Costs reported to Council in previous reports
The costs incurred in the nine months to 31 March 2017 represent 64% of the annual budget of $1,063,600. As noted above, the number of appeals in recently reported periods has been high compared to historical averages. The number of appeals received by Council is a matter that does not lie within the control of Council, however the main factor appears to have been the amendment to the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act made in 2013 which reduced the timeframe for lodgement of an appeal from twelve months to six months. This has had the undesired effect of applicants for more substantial and complex development proposals lodging appeals for no other reason than as a mechanism to preserve early appeal rights. Notwithstanding, Council’s overall success rate in appeals is high.
In relation to costs recovered, the amount of $136,519 had been recovered as at the end of the quarter to 31 March 2017. This compares favourably to an annual revised budget for costs recovered of $65,000.
SUMMARY BY WARD
A summary of the above Land & Environment Court costs by Ward for the nine months to 31 March 2017 is shown in the following table:
Outcomes
At an early stage of each appeal, Council as respondent, is required to file with the Court a Statement of Facts and Contentions outlining the grounds which Council asserts as warranting refusal of a development, or alternatively, that may be addressed by way of conditions of consent.
In cases where issues raised by Council are capable of resolution by the provision by the applicant of additional information or amendment of the proposal, it is the Court’s expectation that this should occur. The Court’s current practice of listing appeals for a preliminary mediation conference before a Commissioner of the Court pursuant to section 34 of the Land & Environment Court Act, strongly encourages this.
In this context, any of three outcomes can be regarded as favourable, namely:
1. If the appeal is in relation to a deemed refusal of an application which, upon assessment, is appropriate for approval: that the development is determined by Council, allowing the appeal to be discontinued by the applicant and avoiding as much as is practicable the incurring of unnecessary legal costs;
2. If the issues raised by Council are capable of resolution by the applicant providing further information, or amending the proposal: that this occurs, so that development consent should be granted, either by Council or the Court;
3. If the issues raised by Council are either not capable of resolution or the applicant declines to take the steps that are necessary to resolve them: that the appeal is either discontinued by the applicant, or dismissed (refused) by the Court.
Ten matters were concluded during the quarter. A favourable outcome was achieved in all matters.
· One matter was dismissed by the Court;
· Nine matters were resolved by agreement, in accordance with an amended proposal.
integrated planning and reporting
Leadership & Governance
Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective |
Delivery Program Term Achievement |
Operational Plan Task |
L2.1 Council rigorously manages its financial resources and assets to maximise delivery of services. |
Achieve financial sustainability targets identified in the Long Term Financial Plan. |
Undertake quarterly reporting to Council on the financial performance of the organisation. |
Governance Matters
Under Section 428 of the Local Government Act 1993, Council is required to report legal costs, and the outcome of each case in its Annual Report.
Risk Management
Quarterly reporting of legal costs to Council together with information about the number, character and outcomes of proceedings enable ongoing oversight of this area of Council’s activity.
Financial Considerations
Land & Environment Court legal costs form part of Council’s recurrent operating budget.
Social Considerations
None undertaken or required.
Environmental Considerations
None undertaken or required.
Community Consultation
None undertaken or required.
Internal Consultation
This report has been developed with input from Council’s Corporate Lawyer, Director Corporate and Director Development & Regulation.
Summary
For the quarter ended March 2017, Council made payments of $285,681 on Land & Environment Court appeals. The total amount expended for the three quarters of 2016/2017 was $685,204. This compares with the annual budget of $1,063,600.
That the analysis of Land and Environment Court costs for the quarter ended 31 March 2017 be received and noted.
|
Tony Ly Financial Accounting Officer |
Jamie Taylor Corporate Lawyer |
David Marshall Director Corporate |
Michael Miocic Director Development & Regulation |
A1 |
Individual Case Summary March 2017 - Land and Environment Court Costs |
|
2017/127190 |
APPENDIX No: 1 - Individual Case Summary March 2017 - Land and Environment Court Costs |
|
Item No: GB.2 |
Ordinary Meeting of Council - 23 May 2017 |
GB.3 / 110 |
|
|
Item GB.3 |
S09112/6 |
|
12 April 2017 |
2016 - 2017 Budget Review - 3rd Quarter ended March 2017
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
purpose of report: |
To inform Council of the results of the 3rd quarter budget review of 2016/17 and seek approval to adjust the annual budget based on the actual financial performance and trend for the period 1 July 2016 to 31 March 2017. |
|
|
background: |
Section 203(1) of the Local Government Regulation 2005 requires that at the end of each quarter, a Budget Review Statement be prepared and submitted to Council that provides the latest estimate of Income and Expenditure for the current (2016/17) financial year. |
|
|
comments: |
Budget adjustments proposed in this review will increase the forecast operating surplus (including capital items) by $202k compared to revised budget. This is primarily due to increased user fees and operational grants partly offset by increases in expenditure, as well as reclassification and deferral of operational project expenditure. When excluding capital income, the net operating result will increase by $197k. The forecast working capital balance at 30 June 2017 will remain unchanged at $4.66m. |
|
|
recommendation: |
That Council receive and note the March 2017 Quarterly Budget Review and that the recommended changes to the 2016/17 budget be adopted. |
Purpose of Report
To inform Council of the results of the 3rd quarter budget review of 2016/17 and seek approval to adjust the annual budget based on the actual financial performance and trend for the period 1 July 2016 to 31 March 2017.
Background
In accordance with Part 9, Division 3, Clause 203 of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 (“The Regulation”):
(1) Not later than 2 months after the end of each quarter (except the June quarter), the responsible accounting officer of a council must prepare and submit to the council a budget review statement that shows, by reference to the estimate of income and expenditure set out in the statement of the council’s revenue policy included in the operational plan for the relevant year, a revised estimate of the income and expenditure for that year.
(2) A budget review statement must include or be accompanied by:
a) a report as to whether or not the responsible accounting officer believes that the statement indicates that the financial position of the council is satisfactory, having regard to the original estimate of income and expenditure, and
b) if that position is unsatisfactory, recommendations for remedial action.
(3) A budget review statement must also include any information required by the Code to be included in such a statement.
The Office of Local Government has developed a set of minimum requirements that assists councils in meeting their obligations as set out in legislation.
At the Council meeting held on 14 June 2016, Council adopted the Revised 2013-2017 Delivery Program & Operational Plan 2016-2017, which incorporated the Annual Budget for 2016-2017.
Comments
This review analyses Council’s financial performance for the third quarter of 2016/17 and forecasts an end of financial year position by recommending budget adjustments to operating and capital budget.
Budget adjustments proposed in this review will increase the forecast operating surplus (including capital items) by $202k compared to revised budget. This is primarily due to increased user fees and operational grants partly offset by increases in expenditure, as well as reclassification and deferral of operational project expenditure. When excluding capital income, the net operating result will increase by $197k.
The change to the operating result is primarily due to increased income and decreased costs in (favourable) :
· Increased golf course and sportsground fees ($263k) offset by expenditure,
· Increased inspection and certificate fees ($108k),
· Increased easement fees ($75k) and traffic management fees ($125k),
· Increased state library grant & other operational grants ($126k),
· Decreased legal costs ($83k).
These were partly offset by decreased income or increased costs in (unfavourable):
· decreased infrastructure restoration fees ($188k),
· increased operating costs for Gordon Golf course ($255k), offset by income
· increased agency salaries for inspections ($130k)
· increased tree maintenance costs ($190k) offset by savings achieved in fuel ($45k) and other areas within Operations department.
In addition project expenditure decreased by $99k mainly due to reclassification of operational projects to capital and deferral to 2017/18 financial year.
Major variations in the capital budget are due to:
· Deferral of projects funded from S94 to 2017/18 ($7.321m), mainly New Street – 32 Dumaresq to Moree Street, Lindfield Village Green - Design Stage, Koola Park Upgrade Stage 4 - carparks and surrounds, St Ives Showground Main Car Park Upgrade and Norman Griffiths Oval Upgrade
Other budget adjustments to capital projects are detailed further in the report and listed in Attachment A2.
The forecast working capital balance at 30 June 2017 is projected to remain unchanged at $4.66m at the last quarterly budget review in December.
Quarterly Budget Review Statements (QBRS)
The Quarterly Budget Review Statements (QBRS) as prescribed by the OLG guidelines are composed of the following budget review reports:
· Income and Expenses Budget Review Statement (Table 1)
· Capital Budget (Expenditure and Funding) Budget Review Statement (Table 2)
· Proposed Operating Budget Adjustments by Resource Group (Table 3)
· Proposed Capital Budget Adjustments by Resource Group (Table 4)
· Income and Expenses Statement by Theme (Table 5)
· Cash and Investments position (Table 6)
· Contracts and Consultancy Expenses (Table 7)
· Capital & Operational Projects Summary (Table 8)
· Statement by the Responsible Accounting Officer
These statements are shown below.
Proposed Budget Adjustments
The table below lists the proposed budget adjustments, including comments for the March
Quarterly Budget Review.
Attachment A2 summarises all proposed budget adjustments for Projects.
The table below splits the current budget by six themes identified within Council’s Delivery Program 2013 – 2017. These themes are used as a platform for planning our activities to address the community’s stated needs and aspirations.
Cash and Investments position
Restricted funds are invested in accordance with Council’s Investment Policy. Total investments portfolio as per the March Investment Report is $141.8m
A detailed Restricted Assets Report as at March 2017 (Actual) is shown in Attachment A1
Contracts and Consultancy Expenses
Capital & Operational Projects Summary
Actual expenditure for capital and operational projects for the period ending 31 March 2017 is $22.6m against the YTD budget of $16.9m, resulting in an unfavourable variance of $5.6m. This variance is mainly due to timing differences between the actual expenditure incurred against the budget forecast of some projects for the quarter.
The table and chart below shows the YTD actual projects expenditure against YTD budget for the quarter ended March 2017.
The proposed budget changes to operational and capital projects total -$7.68m. The most significant variations and projects proposed for adjustment are listed below:
· Projects deferred to 2017/18: New Street - 32 Dumaresq to Moree Street ($3.5m), Lindfield Village Green - Design Stage ($1.2m), Koola Park Upgrade Stage 4 - carparks and surrounds ($900k), Norman Griffiths Oval Upgrade ($900k), St Ives Showground Main Car Park Upgrade ($800k).
· Increased project expenditure due to receipt of State Library grant ($77k) and Local Land Services grant ($25.8) received from Local Land Services for Ku-ring-gai Council Coups Creek Stormwater mitigation.
All Proposed Budget adjustments for each Project and explanation for the changes are detailed in
Attachment A2 – Summary of Capital and Operational Project Budget Adjustments
Major Capital Works Update
Operations Projects
The status of various projects and reviews of programs is covered in the commentary below:
§ Buildings
Works on the Turramurra Memorial Park public toilet upgrade is progressing well and scheduled for completion by June 2017. Quotations are being obtained for upgrades to public toilets at Howson Oval, Koola Park and Bicentennial Park.
§ Roads
The roads program at the end of the third quarter is well advanced with over 90% of the program completed. Works on the regional road program is now complete. All works are expected to be completed by the end of May 2017.
§ Footpaths
Designs are complete for new footpaths at Westbrook Avenue, Warrimoo Avenue and Monteith Avenue. Works have commenced on Westbrook Avenue and Warrimoo Avenue footpaths.
§ Drainage
Works have commenced on the drainage upgrade at 90 Babbage Road, Roseville Chase and a number of minor drainage upgrade works have been completed.
§ Playgrounds
Cameron Park upgrade was completed and opened in March 2017. The upgrade of Lofberg Road Playground and Golden Jubilee Oval are now complete and opened to the public.
§ Sportsfields
Koola Oval is now complete and open to the public. Howson Oval is now complete and open for use.
§ Sports Courts
The upgrade to the car park at Canoon Road was completed in March 2017 and opened for use on 1st April 2017 for the netball season.
§ North Turramurra Recreation Area
§ Work on the playing fields is now complete and the synthetic field is being used for training.
§ Construction of the amenity building and golf cart storage sheds is was completed and opened in early April 2017.
§ Work on the sportsfield car park is underway and scheduled for opening in July 2017.
§ Numbers of players at North Turramurra Golf Course continues to increase.
Strategy Projects
Updates of significant projects are provided below:
§ Lindfield Village Green
Lindfield Village Green will become a public open space, located in Council’s Tryon Road car park on the eastern side of Lindfield behind the Lindfield Avenue shops. The existing at grade car park will be relocated underground and the new Village Green built on top.
Lindfield Village Green will include a public plaza, underground public car parking, a new café or restaurant, public seating, toilets and a lift connecting to the basement car park. The development will meet the highest standards of design excellence and sustainability.
After the Council approved a ‘preferred’ concept design option in 2015, a ‘Final’ concept design was progressed and approved by Council in September 2016. In December 2016 a Development Application for the project was lodged and is pending determination.
We anticipate that construction on the project will commence in early 2018 once development consent is granted. Construction of the car park should take approximately 12 months with the new facilities opening shortly afterwards toward the middle of 2019.
The project will progress according to the following timeframes. Please note these are approximate and may change.
§ Development application submission – December 2016
§ Detailed design – commence July 2017
§ Construction – commence early 2018
§ Lindfield Village Green opens to public – mid 2019
§ Lindfield Community Hub
Lindfield Community Hub, located on the western side of the Lindfield Town Centre, has an estimated construction cost of approximately $150 million. The 1.3 hectare site is currently a Council owned carpark, which will be redeveloped to deliver a new mixed use precinct with community buildings, parks, boutique shops, cafes, restaurants, apartments and a below-ground supermarket.
On 6 September 2016 Council adopted the planning proposal amendments to facilitate approval of the Master Plan, which is awaiting gazettal by the Minister.
During the December quarter the Office of Local Government (OLG) completed their assessment of the Project Proposal which raised a number of technical matters that Council is required to resolve prior to resubmitting to OLG for further consideration. Staff will present a number solution to Council for resolution in early 2017. OLG approval to proceed is a mandatory process for all PPPs which must be completed before calling for Expressions of Interest.
In February 2017, at the inaugural Greater Sydney Planning Awards, the Greater Sydney Commission awarded the Lindfield Village Hub a High Commendation under the category of Great Integrated Planning Project.
§ Gordon Cultural and Civic Hub Master Plan
At the Ordinary Meeting of Council on 9 February 2016 Council resolved that the Gordon Cultural and Civic Hub Master Plan be deferred for the foreseeable future until broader strategic matters arising from the NSW Government merger proposal have been resolved. During that time the project was placed on hold.
The December quarter involved the preparation of a report to Council for OMC 22 November 2016 to recommend that Council recommence the master planning process. At that meeting Council supported the recommendation and resolved to exhibit master plan options within the first half of 2017. Since that time staff having been further developing options in association with feasibility consultants and traffic consultants.
§ Turramurra Community Hub
The Turramurra Community Hub will be located in the area between the railway line, Ray Street and the Pacific Highway, Turramurra (also known as the Ray Street Precinct). The site is 12,300sqm in area and makes up roughly one third of the combined area of the Turramurra Local Centre. The master plan proposes a rejuvenated civic precinct and community heart for Turramurra including a new branch library; multi-purpose community facility; parkland and town square; as well as a new full-line supermarket and associated speciality & leisure retail.
In October 2016 Council’s exhibited master plan won the Australia Award for Urban Design, Policies, Programs and Concepts, convened by the Planning Institute of Australia, The Australian Urban Design Awards are the premier national awards for excellence and innovation in urban design.
In December 2016 Council adopted a final master plan for the proposed Turramurra Community Hub and in February 2017 Council resolved in-principle to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Coles for the Turramurra Community Hub Project.
§ Ku-ring-gai Fitness & Aquatic Centre
In late 2015 Council received a “Notice of Dispute” pertaining to alleged delay costs suffered by the contractor during construction. This was reported to Council at the time and twice more recently. Actions as per Council’s resolution have been enacted. Meanwhile, Council is working through the dispute resolution process as per the contract. The Arbitrator has been appointed and the Contractor has submitted their evidence. Council has submitted its Points of Defence and Cross Claim.
A further case management conference is timetabled for late August with the hearing scheduled to commence in late October
§ St Ives Village Green Master Plan
A final concept design for a new recreation precinct was adopted by Council in 2016.
The adopted design includes a new children’s play space and a skate area, with a central promenade linking facilities with the surrounding park. New paths, seating, shelters, lighting, picnic facilities, shade tree planting and landscaping are also planned, together with improvements to the existing public toilets and the St Ives youth centre.
Council has received grant funding to assist with building improvements and consultants are continuing with design development and detailed documentation of the new recreation precinct based on additional community feedback. It is anticipated that construction will commence late 2017 following the public tender process and reporting to Council.
Future works will see the progressive implementation of the master plan (subject to Council approval for each component), including possible extra car parking in Cowan Road and Memorial Avenue, a perimeter exercise path, terraced seating around William Cowan Oval, and the eventual relocation of the tennis courts to be adjacent to the bowling club.
§ Koola Park Redevelopment, East Killara
Koola Park Stage 3 construction works were completed in late 2016, this included the installation of field fencing; the commissioning of irrigation, drainage and floodlights; and the growing in and establishment of the grass playing surface and the turf cricket wicket. Stage 4 early works including the new perimeter pathway and exercise stations, were also completed and the park is now available for use.
Detailed planning and design for the balance of Stage 4 works including proposed improvements to car parking and the internal access road are progressing pending ongoing discussions with major stakeholders including Crown Lands, Lindfield Junior Rugby Club, NSW Rural Fire Service, Scouts Australia NSW and Killara High School.
§ The Mall Shops, Warrimoo Avenue St Ives
An upgrade of The Mall Shops has been identified as a priority project, and detailed documentation was completed in 2016 for a range of proposed improvements aimed at revitalising and increasing access to the adjoin park. Unfortunately, Council has experienced difficulty in finding suitable contractors and this has delayed the start of works.
The project was tendered unsuccessfully in December 2017. There were only two submissions, and after review, both were found to be non-conforming. To facilitate construction the works package was divided into five Requests for Quotation (RFQ). Contractors have now been appointed and weather permitting site works are expected to commence by mid-2017
The centre will remain open during the proposed works which are not expected to significantly affect the normal running of businesses.
§ Future Park Cnr Allan Avenue, Duff St & Holmes St, Turramurra
To date work on Council’s future park development has included preliminary site planning and community engagement.
Surrounding residents were invited to complete an online survey to help guide the design of the new park. An inclusive playspace design workshop was also held to draw on the communities experience to establish practical, accessible and inclusive design outcomes for the park. Council’s goal is to create an attractive and engaging community recreation place for everyone in the local community to enjoy. It will be designed as a place for meeting, relaxing, playing and undertaking activities for health and well-being and will cater for the local neighbourhood and the growing residential community.
The December quarter saw the erection of perimeter fencing and the demolition of houses on site. A detailed arboricultural assessment and topographical survey of the cleared site was completed in the March quarter to establish site opportunities and constraints.
Detailed planning and design for the proposed playground has commenced and it is anticipated that the community will be invited to comment on the playground proposal in late-2017.
§ St Ives Showground Inclusive Playground
Council is planning a playground upgrade at St Ives Showground to address the lack of play facilities at this important site, and to enable more effective public use of the Showground which is regionally significant open space.
The additional play area will improve the opportunities for inclusion and recreation for a wide range of visitors to the St Ives Showground, in response to increasing population growth. Funding for the playground upgrade has been assisted by the NSW Department of Planning and Environment through the Metropolitan Greenspace Grant Program.
A playground concept design plan has been prepared by specialist playground designers, together with Council’s landscape architects and other technical staff, and the community has been invited to comment. The December quarter saw the adoption of the playground masterplan. Preparation of project documentation for tender is ongoing and a detailed arboricultural survey and assessment of the proposal is underway.
Key feature items of play equipment have been pre-ordered and it is anticipated that construction will commence mid to late 2017 following completion of environmental reviews, public tendering and reporting to Council.
§ Other Playgrounds
A number of other new park playspace designs and playground upgrades were progressed during the March quarter.
Council has experienced some difficulty in finding suitable contractors and this has delayed the start of works at Park Avenue Playground [Roseville Chase] which are now scheduled to commence mid-2017.
Construction of a new playground at Golden Jubilee Fields was substantially completed during the March quarter. The new playground at Bicentennial Park [Lofberg Road] and the new inclusive playspace at Cameron Park [Turramurra] were also both open to the public.
Statement by Responsible Accounting Officer
It is my opinion that the Quarterly Budget Review Statement for Ku-ring-gai Council for the quarter ended 31 March 2017 indicates that Council’s projected financial position at 30 June 2017 will be satisfactory, having regard to the projected estimates of income and expenditure and the original budgeted income and expenditure.
One of Council’s key performance indicators in the Long Term Financial Plan (LTFP) is to provide for a minimum available working capital balance of $4.7m. As a result of the March Review the forecast of available working capital at 30 June 2017 is projected to decrease slightly below the Long Term Financial Plan target of $4.7m.
integrated planning and reporting
Theme 6: Leadership and Governance
Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective |
Delivery Program Term Achievement |
Operational Plan Task |
L2.1 Council rigorously manages its financial resources and assets to maximise delivery of services. |
L2.1.2 Council’s financial services provide accurate, timely, open and honest advice to the community. |
Manages financial performance to achieve targets as defined in the Long Term Financial Plan. |
FIT FOR THE FUTURE IMPROVEMENT ACTION PLAN
The NSW Government's Fit for the Future initiative required all councils to prepare an Improvement Proposal and supporting Implementation Plan demonstrating how all seven Fit for the Future benchmarks would be met by 2016/17, and maintained or improved thereafter.
Council's Fit For the Future Improvement Proposal and supporting Implementation Plan underpins the decision to stand alone and not merge with Hornsby Council. The objectives established in the Improvement Proposal and Implementation Plan are embedded in Council's adopted Integrated Planning and Reporting documents including the Revised Delivery Program 2013-2017 and Operational Plan 2015-2016, Long Term Financial Plan 2015/16 to 2024/25 and Asset Management Strategy 2015/16 to 2024/25.
SUSTAINABILITY |
|||||
Objective |
Action |
Timeframe |
Target |
Measure |
Link to Term Achievement |
Manage financial performance to achieve Financial Sustainability targets identified in the LTFP |
Achieve Operating surplus before capital income items to fund capital expenditure: · Monitor Operating Expenditure and Revenue against budget on a monthly basis · Report on budget variations to senior management on a monthly basis and quarterly to Council |
Monthly Reporting to Senior Management
Quarterly reporting to Council
|
Operating Surplus achieved |
Actuals meet budget and LTFP target |
L2.1.1
Council maintains and improves its long term financial position and performance |
Under Sustainability of the Improvement Action Plan, Council will monitor financial performance on a monthly and quarterly basis and aim to achieve an operating surplus before capital items to fund capital expenditure. The target is to achieve operating surplus and meet targets identified in the Annual Budget and Long Term Financial Plan. The forecast results of the March Quarterly Budget Review 2016 -2017 indicate that Council will achieve these targets by the end of the current financial year. Council achieved operating surpluses for the past 5 years.
Governance Matters
Section 203(1) of the Local Government Regulation 2005 requires that at the end of each quarter, a Budget Review Statement be prepared and submitted to Council that provides the latest estimate of Income and Expenditure for the current financial year.
Risk Management
Income and expenditure is managed through the quarterly budget review process. Although some income and expenditure cannot be directly controlled, it can be monitored and action taken to mitigate potential financial or budgetary risk. Further, Council staff utilise monthly management reporting for managing operational and project income and expenditure, and any budget variations are reported to the Director. The executive team are also provided with monthly financial reports that allow Directors to make informed decisions and plan ahead to ensure budget targets are met.
Financial Considerations
Budget adjustments proposed in this review will increase the forecast operating surplus (including capital items) by $202k compared to revised budget. When excluding capital income, the net operating result will increase by $197k.
The forecast working capital balance at 30 June 2017 will remain unchanged at $4.66m.
Social Considerations
Not applicable.
Environmental Considerations
Not applicable.
Community Consultation
Not applicable.
Internal Consultation
Finance met with each Director and managers as part of the Quarterly Business Review to ensure departmental budget target reflects current forecasts. Comments from Directors have also been included as part of this report.
Summary
The recommended budget adjustments proposed in this review will increase the forecast operating surplus (including capital items) by $202k compared to revised budget. This is primarily due to increased user fees and operating grants partly offset by lower increases in expenditure. When excluding capital income, the net operating result will increase by $197k.
The forecast working capital balance at 30 June 2017 will remain unchanged at $4.66m.
That Council receive and note the March 2017 Quarterly Budget Review and adopt the recommended changes to the 2016/17 budget.
|
Angela Apostol Manager Finance |
David Marshall Director Corporate |
A1 |
Attachment A1 - Restricted Assets Report - March 2017 |
|
2017/127825 |
|
|
A2 |
Attachment A2 - Summary of Capital and Operational Projects Budget Adjustments - March 2017 |
|
2017/128305 |
APPENDIX No: 2 - Attachment A2 - Summary of Capital and Operational Projects Budget Adjustments - March 2017 |
|
Item No: GB.3 |
Ordinary Meeting of Council - 23 May 2017 |
GB.4 / 145 |
|
|
Item GB.4 |
FY00592 |
|
9 May 2017 |
Draft Related Party Disclosures Policy
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
purpose of report: |
To present to Council the Draft Related Party Disclosures Policy |
|
|
background: |
Council is required to prepare financial statements annually in accordance with the Local Government Act 1993 and Regulations, the Australian Accounting Standards and professional pronouncements and the Local Government Code of Accounting Practice and Financial Reporting. For periods commencing on 1 July 2016 the Australian Accounting Standards Board has determined that AASB124 Related Party Disclosures will apply to government entities, including local governments. |
|
|
comments: |
AASB124 requires local governments to make specific disclosures in relation to related parties, transactions and balances (including commitments) with related parties. |
|
|
recommendation: |
That the Draft Related Party Disclosures Policy be adopted by Council |
Purpose of Report
To present to Council the Draft Related Party Disclosures Policy
Background
Council is required to prepare financial statements annually in accordance with the Local Government Act 1993 and Regulations, the Australian Accounting Standards and professional pronouncements and the Local Government Code of Accounting Practice and Financial Reporting. For periods commencing on 1 July 2016 the Australian Accounting Standards Board has determined that AASB124 Related Party Disclosures will apply to government entities, including local governments.
The Draft Related Party Disclosures Policy was noted and endorsed by the Audit & Risk Committee on 6 April 2017.
Comments
AASB 124 requires local governments to make specific disclosures in relation to related party relationships, transactions and balances (including commitments) with related parties in financial statements. The Draft Policy aims to provide guidance to comply with the legislative requirements. The Draft Policy including the Related Party Certificate is attached to this report.
Disclosure in the financial statements will only be made where a transaction has occurred between Council and a related party of Council. In addition the transaction must be material in nature or size, when considering individually or collectively.
The related parties of Council are:
• Entities related to Council;
• Key Management Personnel (KMP) of Council;
• Close family members of KMP; and
• Entities that are controlled or jointly controlled by KMP or their close family.
Related parties include the mayor, councillors, general manager, directors and some managers, their close family members and any entities that they control or jointly control. Any transactions between Council and these parties, whether monetary or not, may need to be identified and disclosed.
A review of related parties will be completed on adoption of this policy and then at intervals not exceeding 12 months.
Council is required to disclose in accordance with the AASB 124 the following:
1. Relationships between a parent and its subsidiaries, irrespective of whether there have been transactions between them,
2. KMP compensation in total and for each of the following categories (individual KMP compensation not identified):
· Short-term employee benefits;
· Post-employment benefits;
· Other long-term benefits; and
· Termination benefits,
3. Where related party transactions have occurred:
· The nature of the related party relationship; and
· Information about the transactions, outstanding balances and commitments including terms and conditions,
4. Separate disclosure for each category of related party,
5. The types of transactions disclosed such as:
· purchase or sale of goods (finished or unfinished)
· purchase or sale of property and other assets
· rendering or receiving goods or services
· leases
· transfers of licence agreements, research and development, finance arrangements
· provision of guarantees and collateral
· commitment to do something if a particular event occurs or does not occur in the future (including executory contracts)
· settlement of liabilities on behalf of the entity or by the entity on behalf of that related party
Draft Related Party Disclosures Process
Council’s Key Management Personnel will be required to complete the Related Party Certificate attached to the Related Party Disclosures Policy. A review of related party transactions and disclosures will be required for each financial reporting period (12 months) – 1July – 30 June.
The following process will be undertaken at the end of each Financial Year, commencing this financial year 2016/17:
1. KMPs will receive the Related Party Certificate ( including all Attachments) prior to finalisation of the Financial Year.
2. The Related Party Certificate contains the following attachments:
a. Attachment A.1 - KMP – Certificate for the period 1 July 2016 to 30 June 2017 - Close Family Members & Entities
KMP must list in this form:
i. Close Family Members
ii. Entities Controlled by KMP and/or Close family Members
b. Attachment A.2 - KMP – Certificate for the period 1 July 2016 to 30 June 2017 Transactions
i. KMPs must identify if there are any transactions with Ku-ring-gai Council - Note: if transactions have been identified, KMPs must fill in Attachment A.3
c. Attachment A.3 - Details of Transactions - This form must be completed only if transactions have been identified in Attachment A.2.
i. KMPs must disclose detailed information for each transaction identified as per the form (examples are provided)
d. Attachment A.4 – Close Family Member – Consent Form – This form must be completed by each Family Member disclosed in Attachment A1 if transactions with Close Family Members have been identified in Attachment A.2
3. The Related Party Certificate, as described above must be signed off by the KMP and returned to Finance - (Manager Finance either by confidential mail or scanned and sent via e-mail) not later than 7 days after the completion of the financial period. ( i.e. 7 July for the financial period ending 30 June)
4. Related Party Certificates are confidential and will be stored in Council’s Records system in a secure container.
integrated planning and reporting
Leadership and Governance
Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective |
Delivery Program Term Achievement |
Operational Plan Task |
Council’s Governance framework is developed to ensure probity, transparency and the principles of sustainability are integrated and applied into our policies, plans, guidelines and decisions making processes. |
Compliance with the requirements of relevant Acts and Regulations. |
Comply with the requirements of the Local Government Act and Regulations. |
Governance Matters
Council is committed to responsible corporate governance, including compliance with the laws and regulations governing related party transactions.
The Draft Policy is in accordance with the Local Government Act 1993 and Regulations, the Australian Accounting Standards and professional pronouncements and the Local Government Code of Accounting Practice and Financial Reporting. AASB 124 requires disclosure of related party relationships, transactions and outstanding balances, including commitments in the financial statements effective from 1 July 2016.
Risk Management
The Draft Policy aims to guide staff in implementing the standard and will assist Council in mitigating the risk of non-compliance.
Financial Considerations
A related party relationship could have an effect on the profit and loss and financial position of Council. Related parties may enter into transactions that unrelated parties would not. The profit and loss and financial position of Council may be affected by a related party relationship even if related party transactions do no occur. The mere existence of the relationship may be sufficient to affect the transactions of Council with other parties. For these reasons, knowledge of Council’s transactions, outstanding balances including commitments and relationship with related parties may affect assessments of its operations by users of financial statements of the Council.
Social Considerations
Not applicable
Environmental Considerations
Not applicable
Community Consultation
None undertaken or required
Internal Consultation
Briefings will be undertaken with KMPs
Summary
From 2016/17, Council must disclose related party relationships, transactions and outstanding balances, including commitments, in the annual financial statements.
Related parties include the mayor, councillors, general manager, directors and some managers, their close family members and any entities that they control or jointly control. Any transactions between Council and these parties, whether monetary or not, may need to be identified and disclosed.
This information will be audited as part of the annual external audit by NSW Audit Office.
Council have drafted Related Party Disclosures Policy as guidance to the staff in implementing the standard and to insure Council is in compliance with the legislative requirements.
The Draft Related Party Disclosures Policy was noted and endorsed by the Audit & Risk Committee on 6 April 2017.
That the Draft Policy Related Party Disclosures be adopted by Council
|
Angela Apostol Manager Finance |
David Marshall Director Corporate |
A1 |
Draft Related Party Disclosures |
|
2017/128827 |
|
|
A2 |
Related Party Policy Disclosures Certificate for the end of financial period 30 June 2017 |
|
2017/128851 |
APPENDIX No: 2 - Related Party Policy Disclosures Certificate for the end of financial period 30 June 2017 |
|
Item No: GB.4 |
Ordinary Meeting of Council - 23 May 2017 |
GB.5 / 172 |
|
|
Item GB.5 |
CY00043/9 |
|
12 May 2017 |
Invitation to the 2017 Child Protection Foundation Masquerade Ball
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
purpose of report: |
To inform Councillors of an invitation from the Child Protection Foundation to attend the 2017 Black Tie Masquerade Ball, being held on Friday 7 July 2017 in the Chateau Reale Lounge at the Doltone House function centre, 223 Belgrave Esplanade, Sylvania Waters. |
|
|
background: |
The Child Protection Foundation is a Sydney-based registered charity dedicated to exposing and reducing the scourge of child abuse in our communities. Money raised from the Black Tie Masquerade Ball will go towards production and distribution of a special range of video resources on dealing with child abuse. |
|
|
comments: |
The 2017 Child Protection Foundation Black Tie Masquerade Ball will be held on Friday 7 July 2017 in the Chateau Reale Lounge at the Doltone House function centre, 223 Belgrave Esplanade, Sylvania Waters. Tickets are $110 per person. |
|
|
recommendation: |
That Council consider the invitation to purchase tickets for those Councillors wishing to attend the 2017 Child Protection Foundation Black Tie Masquerade Ball. |
Purpose of Report
To inform Councillors of an invitation from the Child Protection Foundation to attend the 2017 Black Tie Masquerade Ball, being held on Friday 7 July 2017 in the Chateau Reale Lounge at the Doltone House function centre, 223 Belgrave Esplanade, Sylvania Waters.
Background
The Child Protection Foundation is a Sydney-based registered charity dedicated to exposing and reducing the scourge of child abuse in our communities.
Inviting politicians at Federal, State and Local Government level to the annual Black Tie Masquerade Ball is a key way that Foundation are able to strengthen their political ties.
Comments
The 2017 Child Protection Foundation Black Tie Masquerade Ball will be held on Friday 7 July 2017 in the Chateau Reale Lounge at the Doltone House function centre, 223 Belgrave Esplanade, Sylvania Waters. The event will run from 7pm until midnight.
The elegant-dress Masquerade Ball will include a three-course meal with all beverages, a keynote speaker, special guests, and entertainment from a top party band. There will also be auctions for a quality range of memorabilia items, raffles, and prizes for the best mask for both ladies and gentlemen.
Tickets are $110 per person. Money raised from the Black Tie Masquerade Ball will go towards production and distribution of a special range of video resources on dealing with child abuse.
integrated planning and reporting
L1.1.3
Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective |
Delivery Program Term Achievement |
Operational Plan Task |
Partnerships are established with government agencies, regional and local organisations and community groups and are working to achieve Ku-ring-gai’s community outcomes. |
Pursue new opportunities for partnership arrangements with other agencies, organisations and community groups to achieve community outcomes.
|
Pursue priority areas where partnership arrangements will provide tangible benefits to the local area.
|
Governance Matters
The Payment of Expenses and Provision of Facilities to Councillors Policy provides for Council to meet the reasonable costs of Councillors attendance at formal functions, including functions for charities and community service groups, as authorised by resolution of Council.
Risk Management
Nil.
Financial Considerations
Individual tickets to the 2017 Child Protection Foundation Black Tie Masquerade Ball can be purchased for $110.
Funds are available in the 2016/17 budget.
Social Considerations
The Child Protection Foundation is a Sydney-based registered charity dedicated to exposing and reducing the scourge of child abuse in our communities.
Inviting politicians at Federal, State and Local Government level to the annual Black Tie Masquerade Ball is a key way that Foundation are able to strengthen their political ties.
Money raised from the Black Tie Masquerade Ball will go towards production and distribution of a special range of video resources on dealing with child abuse.
Environmental Considerations
Nil.
Community Consultation
Nil.
Internal Consultation
Nil.
Summary
2017 Child Protection Foundation Black Tie Masquerade Ball will be held on Friday 7 July 2017 in the Chateau Reale Lounge at the Doltone House function centre, 223 Belgrave Esplanade, Sylvania Waters (Attachment A1). Councillors have received an invitation to purchase tickets to the Ball, which are $110 per person.
That Council consider the invitation to purchase tickets for those Councillors wishing to attend the 2017 Child Protection Foundation Black Tie Masquerade Ball.
|
Amber Moloney Manager Records and Governance |
David Marshall Director Corporate |
A1 |
Invitation - 2017 Child Protection Foundation Masquerade Ball |
|
2017/126803 |
Ordinary Meeting of Council - 23 May 2017 |
GB.6 / 177 |
|
|
Item GB.6 |
DA0500/16 |
|
26 April 2017 |
development application
Summary Sheet
Report title: |
12 Killeaton Street, St Ives - Torrens title subdivision of one lot into two, access driveway and associated subdivision works |
ITEM/AGENDA NO: |
GB.6 |
Application No: |
DA0500/16 |
Property Details: |
12 Killeaton Street, St Ives Lot & DP No: Lot 3 DP21167 Site area (m2): 4199.00 sqm Zoning: R2 Low Density Residential |
Ward: |
|
Proposal/Purpose: |
Torrens title subdivision of one lot into two, access driveway and associated subdivision work |
Type of Consent: |
Integrated |
Applicant: |
Chase Burke and Harvey Surveyors |
Owner: |
Mr X Xu |
Date Lodged: |
18 October 2016 |
Recommendation: |
Approval |
Purpose of Report
The purpose of this report is to determine DA0500/16. The application is reported to Council as the proposal is for a Torrens title subdivision where the land contains an endangered ecological species (Sydney Turpentine Ironbark Forest) that is recommended for approval.
integrated planning and reporting
PLACES, SPACES & INFRASTRUCTURE
Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective |
Delivery Program Term Achievement |
Operational Plan Task |
P2.1 A robust planning framework is in place to deliver quality design outcomes and maintain the identity and character of Ku-ring-gai |
Applications are assessed in accordance with State and local plans
|
Assessments are of high quality, accurate and consider all relevant legislative requirements
|
Executive Summary
Issues |
· Preservation of Sydney Turpentine Ironbark Forest · Tree preservation · Impacts of stormwater and driveway infrastructure · Provision of bush fire protection measures |
Submissions |
· 2 submissions |
Land & Environment Court |
No |
Recommendation |
Approval |
|
|
LEGISLATIVE REQUIREMENTS: |
|
Zoning |
R2 Low Density Residential |
Permissible under |
Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan 2015 |
Relevant legislation |
· Rural Fires Act1997 · Threatened Species Conservation Act1995 · Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 · State Environmental Planning Policy No. 55 – Remediation of Land · State Environmental Planning Policy (Building Sustainability Index: BASIX) 2004 · Sydney Regional Environmental Planning Policy (Sydney Harbour Catchment) 2005 · Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan 2015 · Ku-ring-gai Development Control Plan |
Integrated Development |
Yes |
History
Site
30 September 2014 |
Development application DA0398/14 lodged for Torrens title subdivision of one lot into two. |
8 April 2015 |
Council request for information and further detail: · insufficient information and detail – ¾ services plan, driveway details and impacts to trees (arborist report) ¾ stormwater plan, including 5000L water tank ¾ evidence regarding granting of easement to drain water to Pymble Golf Club ¾ driveway layout for Lot 32 ¾ impacts to trees from sewer and stormwater ¾ 88B location (extent) and wording ¾ insufficient landscape detail – access handle ¾ detail of connection to watercourse
· tree impacts from driveway and services · indicative building footprint required Lot 31 · the bushfire consultant is to provide an assessment of the existing canopy, and any canopy thinning required for Asset Protection Zone · the driveway must be designed in accordance with the requirements of ‘Planning for Bush Fire Protection 2006’ |
4 September 2015 |
Council sends second request for outstanding information as requested in previous correspondence. |
23 February 2016 |
Development application DA0398/14 for Torrens title subdivision of one lot into two refused under delegated authority. |
Pre-DA
No pre development application meetings have been held.
DA History
18 October 2016 |
DA lodged. |
31 October 2016 |
The DA was notified for 14 days. |
31 October 2016 |
The DA was referred to internal and external referral bodies. |
22 February 2017
|
A preliminary assessment letter was sent to the applicant raising the following issues: · storm water details required · car parking details for the existing dwelling required · final location of easements required |
15 March 2017 |
Copy of RMS concurrence requirements provided to the applicant |
20 March 2017 |
Amended plans were lodged.
The amended plans were not notified as they did not result in a greater environmental impact than the original scheme. |
The Site
Site Description
The site is described as Lot 3 in DP 21167 and is known is 12 Killeaton Street St Ives. The site is regular in shape, with a frontage of approximately 30.48 metres to Killeaton Street, an average depth of 137.88 metres and a total area of 4199 sqm. The site falls approximately 10 metres from the north-eastern corner at Killeaton Street (RL145.87) to the rear south-western corner (RL135.5), with the majority of the level change occurring within the treed area at the rear of the property.
The site currently accommodates a single storey dwelling of brick construction with a pitched tile roof. The site includes Sydney Turpentine Ironbark Forest vegetation at the rear.
Surrounding Development
The site is generally bounded on either side by residential lots including battle axe lots containing single low density residential dwellings and the Pymble Golf Course to the rear.
The subdivision pattern indicates that lots on either side of the subject lot have been subdivided in a similar pattern to that proposed in the subject development application.
The Proposal
The applicant seeks development consent to:
· subdivide the land into two Torrens title lots in a battle axe configuration, comprising of:
o Lot 31 – 937.6sqm
o Lot 32 – 2968.75sqm (excluding access handle), 3265.1sqm (including access handle)
· retain the existing dwelling on Lot 32
· establish a building footprint and envelope on Lot 31
· subdivision work including:
o new layback and cross over
o new driveway within Lot 32 access handle
o new drainage infrastructure below driveway
o asset protection works for bush fire protection
· landscaping works within access handle and straddling the new common boundary between Lot 1 and Lot 2
· the removal of seven trees (T1, T1a, T2, T3, T4, T5, & T6) from within the site
· vegetation management works and the creation of an 88B positive covenant and restriction on the use of land under Section 88B of the Conveyancing Act 1919, burdening Lot 32 with the requirement to maintain the endangered ecological community Sydney Turpentine Ironbark Forest community on the lot
Amended plans and additional information submitted 5 December 2016
The amended plans and additional information included:
• the inter-allotment stormwater drainage has been re-designed to accommodate the 1 in 100 year overflow event
• revised details of the proposed storm water management
• a new hardstand car parking area (in front of the existing dwelling) added to engineering drawings
Consultation
Community
In accordance with the notification requirements of the KDCP, the application was notified to owners and occupants of surrounding properties for a period of 14 days, between 31 October 2016 and 14 November 2016. In response, Council received submissions from the following:
1. Jacqueline Wilmshurst |
6A Killeaton Street St Ives |
2. Russell Wadey and Gill Wade |
10 Killeaton Street St Ives |
The submissions raised the following issues:
The proposed development may threaten the habitat of the colony of Eastern Whipbird (Psophodes olivaceous).
Council’s Ecological Assessment Officer recommended (Conditions 16, 55 and 61) to ensure the protection of the onsite Sydney Turpentine Ironbark Forest (STIF) vegetation which provides habitat for the eastern Whip Bird. The Eastern Whipbird occurrence at the subject property is not likely to be affected where the development is in compliance with the conditions of consent. A bushland management plan is to be prepared and submitted for approval prior to the release of the Construction Certificate (Condition 16). This management plan will also address habitat values, threats and ameliorative measures to ensure the protection of the onsite STIF which provides habitat for the Eastern Whip Bird. The above conditions ensure the protection of the Whip Bird habitat at the site post development.
Tree loss, bamboo removal, ecological impacts. 15 trees have been removed under 10/50 legislation. A further 19 trees are proposed to be removed under this application. The site contains Sydney Turpentine Ironbark Forest.
Conditions of consent are recommended to ensure the protection of the onsite Sydney Turpentine Ironbark Forest (STIF) vegetation (Conditions 16, 55 and 61).
Only 7 trees are proposed to be removed as part of this development. Eleven trees have been removed from the site under the 10/50 legislation which over-rides Council’s tree preservation policies.
Conditions of consent have been recommended to ensure tree protection and to ensure the location of services for the lots minimises further tree impacts (Conditions 40 - 46).
The bamboo on site is required to be removed as part of the works. This is reflected within the conditions of consent (Condition 48).
Within Council
Engineering
Council's Development Engineer assessed the amended proposal and commented as follows:
General
A Section 73 Certificate will have to be obtained prior to the issue of the Subdivision Certificate, to confirm that each lot has its own water and sewer connection. The sewer main is at the rear corner so to minimise tree impact, Council’s Landscape Assessing Officer has conditioned for the proposed stormwater and sewer pipes to be installed utilising directional drilling/thrust boring within the TPZ of retained trees.
The drawings indicate that services (power, water mains, Telstra and gas) for the front lot (Lot 31) will access directly to the existing service infrastructure in Killeaton Street. Telstra and Gas services for the rear allotment (Lot 32) will require a conduit under the new driveway to minimise any future disturbance of trees root zones and nearby trees.
Water management
Revised engineering plans have been submitted by Chase Burke Harvey. The plan shows stormwater from a future dwelling on Lot 31, the driveway and the existing dwelling on Lot 32 will drain via a pit / pipe drainage system to a 10m long level spreader / raingarden at the rear of the existing dwelling. The location of the level spreader is supported by the project arborist.
A 1.5 metres wide interallotment drainage easement is proposed for the benefit of Lot 31 over Lot 32. A longitudinal section of the proposed interallotment drainage system has been submitted with this application. The interallotment drainage has now been designed to cater for the 100 year overflow event as per Part 24R.6 of Ku-ring-gai DCP and is acceptable.
A 2,000L rainwater tank for the existing dwelling has been depicted on the engineering plans. The overflow from the rainwater tank is to be conveyed to the proposed level spreader. The requirements of Part 24C.4 of the KDCP have been satisfied.
Water quality control measures have been addressed by the provision of a level spreader/ raingarden as well as enviropods within the grated pits. The requirements of Part 24C.6 of the Ku-ring-gai DCP have been satisfied.
Site access
Proposed Lot 31 will have access to Killeaton Street. A new driveway crossover and access driveway can be constructed as part of any future residential development. An indicative driveway layout has been shown to access Lot 32 will which will require a new layback and driveway crossover with a 4 metres wide internal driveway access handle which is also suitable for fire fighting vehicles. A turning bay facility has also been provided to accommodate the fire truck, which is acceptable.
A car parking facility in front of the existing dwelling has been provided to accommodate 2 parking spaces. The hard stand area is to be deleted (Condition 20). On-site parking for the existing dwelling can be accommodated within the existing garage and as well as the vehicle turning area behind the existing dwelling. This has been conditioned.
It will be conditioned that the engineering plans be amended to show the driveway to be a minimum of 5.5 metres in width for a minimum distance of 6 metres from the Killeaton Street property boundary to address RMS recommendations.
A driveway longitudinal section and cross sections have been submitted. The gradients and transitions along the new driveway are compliant with AS2890.1:2004.
Plan of subdivision
A preliminary plan of subdivision has been submitted which is acceptable for DA purposes. All physical works including upgrade of vehicular access driveway, stormwater facilities and the point of discharge are to be constructed as part of the subdivision application.
Recommendation
The development application is acceptable, subject to the recommended conditions of consent.
Planner’s Comment:
The levels show the rear portion of the driveway achieving a level of 1.2m maximum above natural ground and supported by retaining walls. It is important that the driveway be maintained above natural grade in order to minimise tree impacts, however the levels above the natural ground surface are excessive. In consultation with Council’s Development Engineer and Landsacpe Assessment Officer, a condition of consent is recommended (Condition 20) that limits the finished level of the driveway to0 the existing ground level (with allowance for base material and slab thickness). This will reduce the need for retaining walls to the site and will allow for use of the existing garage at the rear of the dwelling to be maintained.
Landscaping
Council's Landscape and Tree Assessment Officer commented on the proposal as follows:
Tree impacts
A detailed arboricultural impact assessment report has been submitted with the application. The following assessment comments are made:
· The proposal includes the removal of seven trees and this is acceptable T1, T1a,T2, T3, T4, T5, & T6.
· T1 Quercus robur (English Oak) is located within the stand of Bamboo adjacent to the western site boundary. The tree has poor structural form with some dieback and has been suppressed by the Bamboo.
· T1a Pittosporum undulatum (Native Daphne) is located along the western site boundary. This tree conflicts with the location of the driveway and is not of broader landscape significance.
· T4 & T5 Liquidambar styraciflua (Sweet Gum) are located adjacent to the western site boundary. The trees are large and over-mature with evidence of previous limb failure and storm damage.
· T6 Cedrus deodar (Himalayan Cedar) is located adjacent to the western site boundary. The tree is outwardly in good health but has poor structural form and is suppressed by T5.
· The following trees have already been removed under 10/50 legislation: T12a, T15, T16, T18, T18a, T19, T21, T22, T23, T24 and T25.
· The proposed driveway is located above existing grades and above the existing compacted driveway. Therefore reducing tree impact.
· The excavation for the proposed stormwater pipes is located outside of the structural root zones of retained trees but within the TPZ. Excavation will result in some root loss and tree impact. To further reduce tree impact it is conditioned that the proposed stormwater pipe be installed utilising directional drilling/thrust boring with any drilling pits to be located outside of the TPZ. This will ensure that root plates will remain intact (Condition 45).
Landscape plan/tree replenishment
The landscape plan is acceptable, subject to replacing two proposed plantings of Hymenospermum flavum (Native Frangipani) with Angophora coststa (Sydney Red Gum), to replenish endemic canopy trees removed as part of the proposal (Condition 19).
Stormwater plan
To minimise tree impact it is conditioned for the proposed stormwater and sewer pipes to be installed utilising directional drilling/thrust boring within the TPZ of retained trees (Condition 45).
Fire
The site is identified as bush fire prone land. The applicant’s fire consultant recommends the proposed two allotments be maintained as an APZ. It is noted that the existing tree coverage to the south of the existing dwelling is acceptable, but will require management of the ground and mid storey which can be undertaken under the 10/50 legislation.
Additional comments
The submitted subdivision plan #PS14122-C Rev C dated 30/09/2016 has a notation stating that ‘Final location od easements subject to on site direction by Dr Peter Bacon, Engineer, WRT Infiltration Wetland’.
This notation must be deleted from the plans as it allows the possibility of the easement being relocated. Assessment is based on the location and plans provided. If the easement requires relocation a modification to the consent would be necessary.
Planner’s Comment:
A condition of consent requiring the deletion of the reference on the plans to relocation of the easement is recommended (Condition 18). The required conditions of RMS have been reviewed by the landscape officer and found to be acceptable, subject to conditions requiring a landscape strip along the boundary of the site adjacent the driveway. The amended plans submitted on 28/02/17 (Revision C) include a hardstand area that has the potential to result in tree impacts. This is deleted via a condition of consent (Condition 20) and the driveway is to be provided at grade on the existing ground level, avoiding tree impacts but allowing for the existing car garage at the rear of the existing dwelling to be retained and used. Refer to the additional comments of Council’s landscape officer below:
Landscape Services has no objection to the application with conditions provided. The amended plans proposed an additional double parking bay (forward of the dwelling) and proposed retaining walls to the driveway. These elements of the proposal would result in tree impacts. The car parking space is to be deleted via condition, and the driveway is to be lowered so that the driveway is constructed on top of existing grades and enabling the continued use of the garage behind the dwelling. It is understood the Development Engineer will delete via condition (Condition 20)
The RMS requirement for a double width driveway at the driveway entry is conditioned (Conditions 20 and 64). The western setback of the driveway pavement within the proposed access handle shall be 1.0m wide to allow sufficient landscape area for screen planting Condition 20).
Ecology
Council's Ecological Assessment Officer commented on the proposal as follows:
During the site inspection Remnant Sydney Turpentine Ironbark Forest (STIF) which is listed as an Endangered Ecological Community (EEC) listed under the Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 was identified. The STIF community was identified around the existing dwelling and comprised of remnant Syncarpia glomulifera (Sydney Turpentine) trees. The occasional native groundcover was identified from within the STIF community. It was noted during the site inspection that a number of Sydney Turpentine and Pittosporum undulatum (Sweet Pittosporum) were being removed under the Rural Fire Service 10/50 code. Therefore it should be noted that the site survey submitted is not up to date.
Ecological constraints/environmental controls
The native vegetation within the rear of the site has been mapped as “biodiversity significance” under the KLEP 2015.
The proposed development satisfies the requirement of clause 6.3 Biodiversity protection of the KLEP. In particular, the proposed development satisfies the objectives of subclauses 1(a), (b), (c) and (d) of clause 6.3, in that the proposed development:
· protects, maintains, and improves the biological diversity and processes of the native vegetation necessary for their continued existence,
· encourages the recovery of the STIF, and protect biodiversity corridors,
· the development has been designed and sited to avoid the adverse impact upon the STIF.
According to subclause 4(a) of clause 6.3 of the LEP, the proposed development satisfies the provisions of subclause 4(b)(i) and (iv) and (iv) of clause 6.3 of the LEP in that the development:
· minimises disturbance and adverse impacts on the STIF
· includes measures to achieve no net loss of significant vegetation
Ecological Assessment
Proposed Lot 31 will not require the direct removal of EEC Sydney Turpentine Ironbark Forest, however the proposed stormwater pipe will result in impact upon trees/vegetation which form part of the onsite STIF community located behind the rear of the existing dwelling.
An assessment of significance has been undertaken for threatened species, populations and ecological communities listed within the TSC Act (1995), observed or with suitable habitat contained within the subject site. The impact assessment concludes:
· the proposed development is not likely to have a significant effect on threatened species, populations or ecological communities or their habitats
· a Species Impact Statement is not required for the proposed development
The aforementioned conclusion is supported on ecological grounds.
Conclusion:
The application is acceptable, subject to recommended conditions (Conditions 16, 17, 55 and 61).
The conditions require:
· removal of noxious plants & weeds
· a Bushland Management Plan (BMP) to be prepared and submitted to and approved by the Certifying Authority for the management of the protection of the endangered ecological community know as Sydney Turpentine Ironbark Forest (STIF). All STIF is to be managed under the BMP. The BMP is to cover only areas beyond the approved asset protection zone.
· nest boxes
· Sydney Turpentine Ironbark Forest protection – under a Section 88B instrument. Prior to release of the Subdivision Certificate, a positive covenant and restriction on the use of land are to be created under Section 88B of the Conveyancing Act 1919, burdening Lots with the requirement to maintain the endangered ecological community Sydney Turpentine Ironbark Forest community
Outside Council
NSW Roads and Maritime Service (RMS)
The application has frontage to a sub-arterial road, and was referred to the NSW Roads and Maritime Services (RMS) for concurrence.
The RMS provided the following comments:
“From the review of this application it was noted that current condition of the driveway is deteriorated and as such it is necessary to reconstruct the driveway including gutter crossing. Since the proposed development requires reconstruction of the driveway along a 'classified regional road' (Killeaton Street) this Application triggers concurrence from the Roads and Maritime in accordance with Section 138 of the Roads Act 1993.
Roads and Maritime has reviewed the submitted documentation and provides concurrence to the proposed development under Section 138 of the Roads Act 1993, subject to the following conditions being included in any consent issued by Council:
1. any new buildings and structures together with any improvements integral to the future use of the site are to be wholly within the freehold property (unlimited in height or depth), along the Killeaton Street boundary.
2. the design and construction of the gutter crossing on Killeaton Street shall be in accordance with Council standards and requirements.
3. all vehicles are to enter and leave the site in a forward direction.
4. in accordance with AS 2890.1- 2004 (Parking Facilities, Part 1: Off-street car parking), the driveway shall be a minimum of 5.5 metres in width for a minimum distance of 6 metres from the property boundary.
5. a Construction Traffic Management Plan detailing construction vehicle routes, number of trucks, hours of operation, access arrangements and traffic control should be submitted to Council for approval prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate.
6. sight distances from the proposed vehicular crossings to vehicles on Killeaton Street are to be in accordance with the Austroads 'Guide to Traffic Engineering Practice, Part 5: Intersections at Grade, Section 6.2 — Sight Distance' and AS 2890. Vegetation and proposed landscaping/fencing must not hinder sight lines to and from the vehicular crossings to motorists, pedestrians and cyclists.”
Planner’s Comment:
Having regard to the comments of the RMS, Council has considered the ability of the site to accommodate the 5.5 metres wide driveway for a distance of 6 metres from the street boundary. Having regard to the slope of the land and driveway grades, along with proximity to trees, it is considered that the requirements of RMS can be accommodated on the site and with appropriate conditions, certainty regarding the outcome of the development on the site can be achieved. The conditions of RMS and a further Council condition have been recommended (Conditions 20 and 64).
Office of Water
In accordance with the provisions of the Water Management Act 2000, the application was referred to the NSW Department of Primary Industries - Office of Water for assessment of measures to be taken with respect to development on waterfront land for which a Controlled Activity Approval is required. The application is in proximity to a watercourse within Pymble Golf Course. The comments provided by the Office of Water are as follows:
“The Office of Water has reviewed documents for the above development application and considers that, for the purposes of the Water Management Act 2000 (WM Act), a controlled activity approval is not required and no further assessment by this agency is necessary for one of the following reasons.
The proposed activity is not occurring on waterfront land (which includes (i) the bed of any river together with any land within 40 metres inland of the highest bank of the river, or (ii) the bed of any lake, together with any land within 40 metres of the shore of the lake, or (iii) the bed of any estuary, together with any land within 40 metres inland of the mean high water mark of the estuary).
Should the proposed development be varied in any way that results in development extending onto land that is waterfront land, or encompassing works that are defined as controlled activities, then the Office of Water should be notified.”
Planner’s Comment:
Having regard to the comments of the Office of Water, a Controlled Activity Approval is not required and no terms of approval have been applied.
Rural Fire Services
The proposed residential subdivision of bush fire prone land is integrated development under the provisions of Section 91 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. In accordance with the provisions of Section 100B of the Rural Fires Act 1997, the application was referred to the NSW Rural Fire Service for assessment of measures to be taken with respect to the protection of persons, property and the environment from danger that may arise from a bush fire and to issue a Bush Fire Safety Authority. The Rural Fire Service issued a Bush Fire Safety Authority, subject to terms contained in Condition 65.
Statutory Provisions
Acts (E P & A, DDA, etc)
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
The proposal is “Integrated Development” under Part 4 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (as amended) (EP&A Act) and requires development consent. Refer to the comments of the Rural Fire Service above.
The relevant provisions of environmental planning instruments, proposed instruments, DCPs, the regulations and policies are addressed below. The likely impacts, suitability of the site and public interest are also addressed.
State Environmental Planning Policies
State Environmental Planning Policy No. 55 – Remediation of Land
The provisions of SEPP 55 require Council to consider the potential for a site to be contaminated. The subject site has been historically used for residential uses. As such, it is unlikely to contain any contamination and further investigation is not warranted in this case.
Sydney Regional Environmental Plan No. 20 - Hawkesbury-Nepean River
SREP 20 applies to land within the catchment of the Hawkesbury Nepean River. The general aim of the plan is to ensure that development and future land uses within the catchment are considered in a regional context. The Plan includes strategies for the assessment of development in relation to water quality and quantity, scenic quality, aquaculture, recreation and tourism.
The proposed development achieves the relevant aims under this policy as water re-use will minimise the impact on downstream waterways.
State Environmental Planning Policy (Infrastructure) 2007
The development site is not in, or immediately adjacent to, the North Shore rail corridor or a Classified Road. The section of Killeaton Street where the site is located is classified as a Collector Road and the remaining section is classified as a Regional Road. However the application has been referred to the RMS for concurrence under Section 138 of the Roads Act 1993.The RMS have provided concurrence, refer to the comments of RMS above.
Local Content (LEP, KPSO, etc)
Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan 2015
Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan 2015 is the statutory LEP for the subject site.
In summary, the objectives of this plan are to:
· guide future development with respect to environmental, social, economic, heritage and cultural outcomes,
· provide housing choice,
· achieve land-use relationships that promote efficient use of infrastructure.
It is considered that the proposed development is consistent with the objectives of the LEP in this regard.
Sections of Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan 2015 relevant to the proposed development are discussed below:
Zoning and permissibility
The site is located within the R2 Low Density Residential zone. The proposed land subdivision is permissible with consent within the R2 zone under clause 2.6 of KLEP 2015.
Low Density Residential zone objectives:
The objectives for the R2 Low Density Residential zone are:
· To provide for the housing needs of the community within a low density residential environment.
· To enable other land uses that provide facilities or services to meet the day to day needs of residents.
· To provide for housing that is compatible with the existing environmental and built character of Ku-ring-gai.
The development is consistent with the objectives of the zone in that it facilitates additional housing in the locality and the subdivision is capable of supporting housing that is compatible with the built character of the low density residential environment.
Development standards
Development standard |
Proposed |
Complies |
4.1 Minimum subdivision lot size: · Area of 930m2 (excluding access handle) · Minimum site width of 18 metres at 12 metres from the street frontage of the lot Note: this standard does not apply to battle-axe lots |
Lot 31 lot size – 937.6sqm Site width – 23.16m |
YES
YES |
Lot 32 lot size – battle axe lot · 2968.75sqm (excluding access handle) · 3265.1sqm (including access handle) |
YES |
|
4.4 Floor Space Ratio: maximum 0.3:1 |
Lot 32 – (existing dwelling) · GFA – approximately 205sqm · FSR - 0.06:1 |
YES
|
Clause 5.9 – Preservation of trees or vegetation
Important trees have been surveyed as part of the application documentation. The removal of trees has been considered by Council’s Ecologist and Landscape and Tree Aassessment officers and is considered acceptable, with important vegetation being retained and enhanced. The objective of this clause is to preserve the amenity of area, including biodiversity values, through the preservation of trees and other vegetation. It is considered that the proposed development does not unduly impact upon any existing significant trees or vegetation and therefore meets the objective of the control.
LEP - Part 6 Additional local provisions
Clause 6.2 - Earthworks
The proposed development will not restrict the existing or future use of the site, adversely impact on neighbouring amenity, the quality of the water table or disturb any known relics. Additionally, the fill to be removed will be disposed of appropriately. The application is considered to be consistent with the objectives of Clause 6.2.
Clause 6.3 - Biodiversity protection
The native vegetation within the rear of the site is mapped as land comprising biodiversity significance. Council’s Ecological Assessment Officer has reviewed the proposal. The Officer is satisfied that the requirements of clause 6.3 Biodiversity protection of the KLEP are addressed, in particular, subclauses 1(a), (b), (c) and (d) of clause 6.3, in that the proposed development:
· protects, maintains, and improves the biological diversity and processes of the native vegetation necessary for their continued existence
· encourages the recovery of the STIF, and protect biodiversity corridors
· the development has been designed and sited to avoid the adverse impact upon the STIF
According to subclause 4(a) of clause 6.3 of the LEP, the proposed development satisfies the provisions of subclause 4(b)(i) and (iv) and (iv) of clause 6.3 of the LEP in that the development:
· minimises disturbance and adverse impacts on the STIF
· includes measures to achieve no net loss of significant vegetation
The proposed development has been designed to minimise impacts on the diversity and condition of native vegetation, fauna and habitat as per the requirements of the LEP. This will be further enhanced by conditions of consent which require:
· removal of noxious plants & weeds
· a Bushland Management Plan (BMP) to be prepared and submitted to and approved by Certifying Authority for the management of the protection of the endangered ecological community know as Sydney Turpentine Ironbark Forest (STIF). All STIF is to be managed under the BMP. The BMP is to cover only areas beyond the approved asset protection zone,
· nest boxes
· Sydney Turpentine Ironbark Forest protection – Section 88B instrument. Prior to release of the Subdivision Certificate, a positive covenant and restriction on the use of land are to be created under Section 88B of the Conveyancing Act 1919, burdening Lots with the requirement to maintain the endangered ecological community Sydney Turpentine Ironbark Forest community
The above demonstrates compliance with the objectives of Clause 6.3 of the Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan.
Clause 6.4 - Riparian land and waterways
The site is mapped as riparian land under Council’s mapping system. The development does not encroach within areas of riparian land. Conditions of consent will ensure that construction impacts of riparian land are managed in accordance with the objectives of Clause 6.4.
Clause 6.5 - Stormwater and water sensitive urban design
The objectives of this clause are to avoid or minimise the adverse impacts of urban stormwater on the land on which development is to be carried out, adjoining properties, native bushland, waterways and groundwater systems.
Council’s Development Engineer is satisfied that the proposed development, subject to conditions, will manage urban stormwater run-off as per the requirements of the LEP.
Policy Provisions (DCPs, Council policies, strategies and management plans)
Ku-ring-gai Development Control Plan (2015)
DCP COMPLIANCE TABLE SECTION A - |
||
Development control |
Proposed |
Complies |
Part 3 Land Consolidation and Subdivision |
||
3A – General Controls for Consolidation and Subdivision |
||
3A.1 Lot Shape, Orientation and Design |
|
|
• Ability for the lot to support the land use permitted under the zoning |
The application has demonstrated that the lots are of a size, shape and orientation that allow for the most likely use within the R2 zone, being low density residential dwellings. |
YES |
• Protection of habitat and distinctive environmental features |
The subdivision is proposed in an arrangement of lots that allows for the preservation of biodiversity vegetation. |
YES |
• Sharing of views |
The proposed subdivision does not alter any significant views. |
YES |
• Avoiding the location of development on steep lands |
The parts of the site with moderate slope (at the rear) are proposed to be protected under 88B restriction for STIF protection and are not available for building works or associated development. |
YES |
• Protection and enhancement of the amenity, solar access, privacy, open space and views |
The subdivision results in an acceptable outcome for neighbour amenity, solar access, privacy, open space and views. |
YES |
• Minimisation of impacts of the development (including any asset protection zones required) on riparian or Greenweb lands |
The proposed lot shapes and subdivision works do not impact on significant vegetation. Refer to the comments of Council’s Ecological Assessment Officer |
YES |
• Incorporation of the principles of water sensitive urban design. |
The subdivision works enable the future development to incorporate water sensitive urban design principles. |
YES |
• Minimisation of the need for bush fire hazard reduction, while protecting life and property. |
The asset protection works have been considered in conjunction with the ecological value of the site, and can be achieved without undue impacts. |
YES |
The block width, dimension, orientation and layout are to consider the existing subdivision pattern of the locality. |
The subdivision proposed gives regard to the subdivision pattern of the area (adjoining lots have been subdivided into three in the past) and maintains the regularity of lots anticipated by the LEP. |
YES |
New lot/s created is to be such that each lot with street frontage allows for the siting of a development which will address the street. |
The proposed new lot 31 allows for development that will address the street. |
YES |
Gated communities will not be permitted. |
None proposed. |
N/A |
3A.2 Minimum Lot Depth for Bushfire Prone land |
|
|
· 55m – 5o effective slope · 65m – 5o-10o effective slope · 90m - >10o effective |
The bush fire prone vegetation is contained on proposed Lot 32, and this lot has a depth of 97m and is compliant. Proposed Lot 31 in itself does not contain bush fire prone vegetation. It is noted that the effective slope of Lot 31 is < 5 degrees. The lot depth is 40.485m. The indicative building footprint indicates a rear setback of >21m can be achieved on the site. |
YES |
3A.3 Building Footprint |
|
|
Building footprint to be: · accessible and practical · outside of ecological or heritage significant areas · avoid tree removal · allow for private open space |
An indicative building footprint has been provided, having regard to the ecological sensitivities of the site, and is located to limit tree removal. The footprint is in a practical and accessible location suitable for building. |
YES |
3A.4 Trees and Vegetation |
|
|
Minimises impacts on and maximises the retention of existing significant trees and vegetation on or adjacent to the site within the design of: · building footprints · access ways · roadways, including perimeter roads or trails · services · inter-allotment drainage easements · asset protection zones |
The subdivision pattern, location of access handle and associated infrastructure, and the indicative building footprint has regard for the minimisation of tree removal, and has complied with the requirements of Council’s Landscape Assessment Officer and Ecological Assessment Officer. |
YES |
3A.5 Access |
||
· minimum width of handle 4.6 metres · maximum number of lots utilising access handle – 3 · Access for service vehicles, emergency vehicles and waste collection vehicles must be available |
The access handle is 7.32m wide and services one lot only. The carriageway makes provision for the access and turning requirements of the RFS for a fire fighting vehicle on the site. |
YES |
3A.6 Infrastructure |
||
All lots shall be provided services such as electricity, gas, town water supply, sewerage and communications. |
The provision of and location of services (including storm water) required for the subdivision has been made having consideration for impacts to trees. |
YES |
The table below addresses the assessment criteria contained under Section A Part 4 – Dwelling Houses in relation to the ability of the existing dwelling on the site to meet the development indicies for a dwelling on its newly configured lot (Lot 32).
DCP COMPLIANCE TABLE SECTION A - Part 4 Dwelling houses |
||
Development control |
Proposed |
Complies |
4A – Site Design |
||
4A.1 Local Character and Streetscape |
||
Visual Character - Design components are based on existing predominant visual character of the local neighbourhood |
|
|
- Consideration to be given to visibility of on site development and relationship to scale, layout and character of streetscape |
The proposal maintains character and streetscape. |
YES |
4A.2 Building Setbacks |
||
Building Line (Front Setback) |
|
|
Single storey Low side – 9m (minimum) High side – 12m (minimum)
|
The indicative footprint meets the street setback requirement of the DCP. |
YES |
Two storey Low side – 9m (11m average) High side – 12m (14m average)
|
|
|
Building Line (Rear Setbacks)
- 12 minimum for depths >48m - 25% of average of site depth is <48m |
The indicative footprint meets the setback requirement of the DCP. |
YES |
Building Line (Side Setbacks) |
|
|
>20m width - 9% of site width (single storey) - 12% of site width (double storey)
|
The existing dwelling does not change in its relationship to side boundaries as a result of the subdivision. Additionally, the existing dwelling is on a lot of sufficient size (Lot 32 - 3265.1m2) that the subdivision does not alter the dwelling’s reliance upon the setbacks to maintain the amenity of the area. The proposed (Lot 31) has a lot width of 23.16 metres and is capable of meeting the setback requirements of the DCP. |
YES |
Battle axe lots Long boundaries - 15% or 3m Other boundaries (rear setback) - depth >48m – min 12m depth >48m - min 25% average site depth
|
The existing dwelling does not change in its relationship to side boundaries as a result of the subdivision. Additionally, the existing dwelling is on a lot of sufficient size (Lot 32 - 3265.1m2) that the subdivision does not alter the dwelling’s reliance upon the setbacks to maintain the amenity of the area. |
NO |
4A.3 Built-Upon Area |
||
Lot 31 – Lot 32 - |
It is anticipated that Lot 31 can comply with BUA, which is based upon compliant lot size. The existing dwelling is located upon a lot that has an area of 3265.1m2, and complies with the BUA requirement. |
YES |
4A.4 Landscaping |
||
Tree replenishment - Less than 850m2 x3 trees - 850m2 to 1,000m2 x5 trees - 1,001m2 to 1,500m2x7 trees - Over 1,500m2 x10 trees or as directed |
Lot 31 has 5 trees on the site. Lot 32 has >10 trees on the site and retains significant STIF vegetation. |
YES |
4B – Access and Parking |
||
4B.1 Vehicle Access |
||
Driveways |
|
|
- <18m frontage 1 driveway |
The proposed Lot 31 retains use of the existing unformed gravel driveway. Lot 32 that contains the existing dwelling has a new driveway constructed with 4.0m width to accommodate a fire truck as per RFS requirements and a 5.5m width for the first 6m as required by RMS. |
YES |
- 3.5m crossing |
||
- Driveways designed in accordance with AS 2890.1 (2004) Off Street Car Parking |
||
4B.2 Car Parking Provision |
||
- 2 on-site parking spaces |
The existing dwelling has provision for 2 onsite parking spaces. |
YES |
4B.3 Carports and Garages |
||
- 2 spaces behind building line |
The car accommodation for the existing dwelling will be located on a battle axe lot (Lot 32), and so is behind the Killeaton Street building line. Further, the parking is suitably setback from boundaries in accordance with the requirements of the DCP. |
YES |
- Works should not prevent ability to provide 2 spaces behind building line |
|
|
- Width <6m as viewed from street |
|
|
- Detached carports single storey, set back 0.6m from side and rear boundaries |
|
|
- Detached garage, single storey set back 1.5 (from side/rear boundaries |
|
|
4C.4 Private Open Space |
||
- Min depth 5m and area of 50m² |
Lot 31 is capable of providing adequate private open space. Lot 32 retains large areas available to private open space, far in excess of 50m2 |
YES |
- At least one north facing area |
|
|
4C.5 Solar Access |
||
- 4hrs between 9am – 3pm on June 22 to north facing windows and all living areas and POS |
Lot 31 is capable of providing adequate solar access to a future dwelling as its neighbours. Lot 32 maintains the existing solar access relationship to neighbouring properties and is acceptable. |
|
- To neighbouring properties and dwelling itself |
|
|
- Where existing non-compliance reduction limited to 20% |
|
4A.2 Building setbacks
The DCP requires that a dwelling on the proposed battle axe Lot 32 have a side boundary setback of 4.57 metres. The existing dwelling that is located on the proposed battle axe lot has a minimum setback of 1m to the eastern boundary. The existing dwelling does not change in its relationship to side boundaries as a result of the subdivision. Additionally, the existing dwelling is on a lot of sufficient size (Lot 32 - 3265.1m2) that the subdivision does not alter the dwelling’s reliance upon the setbacks to maintain the amenity of the area.
DCP Section B
Part 15 – Land contamination
The site is not mapped as being contaminated.
The proposal has been assessed against the provisions of State Environmental Planning Policy 55 – Remediation of Land (SEPP 55). The proposal is satisfactory in this regard as discussed earlier in the report. Refer to the SEPP 55 discussion for further details in this regard.
Part 16 – Bushfire risk
The site is mapped as bush fire prone land.
In accordance with the provisions of section 91 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, the development is Integrated Development. S100B of the Rural Fires Act specifies that subdivision of bush fire prone land for residential purposes requires the issue of a Bush Fire Safety Authority (BFSA) by the Rural Fire Service (RFS). A referral to Rural Fire Services has been undertaken, and a BFSA has been issued by the RFS.
Council has considered the measures to be taken with respect to the protection of persons, property and the environment from danger that may arise from a bush fire. Appropriate conditions as required by the RFS have been recommended.
Part 17 – Riparian lands
The site is mapped as riparian land under Council’s mapping system. The development does not encroach within areas of riparian land. Conditions of consent will ensure that construction impacts of riparian land are managed.
Council’s Ecological Assessment Officer and Water and Catchments Officer are satisfied that, subject to conditions, the proposed development will minimise impacts on the riparian area.
Part 18 – Biodiversity
The land is mapped as comprising biodiversity significant land.
Council’s Ecological Assessment Officer is satisfied that the proposed development will not result in a significant detrimental impact contrary to the objectives of these provisions in relation to the diversity and condition of native vegetation, fauna and habitat, subject to conditions.
DCP Section C
Part 21 General site design
The proposal has been assessed against the earthworks provisions contained in this Part. The proposed development is consistent with these provisions as there is minimal excavation and fill required for the proposed development, subject to conditions of consent. The works will generally maintain the natural topography of the land. The works will not result in a significant impact in relation to existing trees worthy of retention, from soil erosion or siltation or degradation of land subject to conditions.
With regard to the landscape design provisions, Council’s Landscape and Tree Assessment Officer is satisfied that the proposed development has been designed and is consistent with the objectives of the controls and as consequence has not raised any significant issues or concerns in relation to these provisions.
As a result of the above it is considered that the development meets the objectives of the control.
Part 22 General access and parking
The proposal has been assessed against the relevant provisions contained in this Part. The subject site provides sufficient on-site parking in accordance with the car parking rates. No issues or concerns were raised by Council’s Development Engineer in relation to this Part. The proposal meets the relevant objectives of this control.
Part 23 General building design and sustainability
23.4 Waste Management and 23.10 Construction, Demolition and Disposal
The proposal has been assessed against the provisions contained in these Parts. The site containing the existing dwelling provides sufficient bins for general household waste including recycling materials and is suitably located to ensure minimal impacts. Any future application for a dwelling on Lot 31 will be subject to assessment in this regard.
No issues or concerns were raised by Council’s Development Engineer in relation to stormwater quality control during construction and erosion and sediment control during construction subject to conditions of consent. The development as conditioned is consistent with the objectives of these parts.
Part 23.5 and 23.6 General Acoustic and Visual Privacy
The proposal has been assessed against the provisions contained in these Parts. The proposal will not result in a significant detrimental impact contrary to these provisions.
The proposal allows for the retention of significant trees and for landscaping to either side of the driveway. It is considered that the proposed lot (Lot 31) can accommodate an appropriately designed dwelling that will maintain a reasonable level of privacy consistent with a low density residential environment. The creation of an additional lot (Lot 31) at the Killeaton Street frontage of the site will not result in undue privacy impacts to the existing dwelling located at the rear (Lot 32).
Part 24 Water management
Council’s Development Engineer is satisfied that the proposed development will not result in a significant detrimental impact contrary to the objectives of these provisions for the reasons detailed in the above referral comments. Refer to these comments for further details in this regard.
Part 25 – Notification
The application has been notified in accordance with the requirements of the DCP. The submissions received are addressed above.
Section 94 Development Contributions Plan 2010
Condition 65 requires the payment of the applicable s94 contribution of $26,663.78.
Likely Impacts
The likely impacts of the development have been considered within this report and are deemed to be acceptable, subject to conditions.
Suitability of the Site
The site is suitable for the proposed development.
Public Interest
The proposal is considered to be in the public interest.
Conclusion
Having regard to the provisions of section 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, the proposed development is considered to be satisfactory.
A. THAT Council, as the consent authority, being satisfied that the proposed development will be in the public interest, grant development consent to DA0500/16 for the Torrens title subdivision of one lot into two and associated subdivision works at 12 Killeaton Street, St Ives, subject to the conditions. Pursuant to section 95(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, this consent lapses if the approved works are not physically commenced within 2 years of the date of the Notice of Determination.
Conditions that identify approved plans:
1. Approved architectural plans and documentation (new development)
The development must be carried out in accordance with the following plans and documentation listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, except where amended by other conditions of this consent:
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
2. Inconsistency between documents
In the event of any inconsistency between conditions of this consent and the drawings/documents referred to above, the conditions of this consent prevail.
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
3. Approved landscape plans
Landscape works shall be carried out in accordance with the following landscape plan(s), listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, except where amended by other conditions of this consent:
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
Conditions to be satisfied prior to demolition, excavation or construction:
4. Asbestos works
All work involving asbestos products and materials, including asbestos-cement-sheeting (ie. Fibro), must be carried out in accordance with the guidelines for asbestos work published by WorkCover Authority of NSW.
Reason: To ensure public safety.
5. Notice of commencement
At least 48 hours prior to the commencement of any development (including demolition, excavation, shoring or underpinning works), a notice of commencement of building or subdivision work form and appointment of the principal certifying authority form shall be submitted to Council.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
6. Notification of builder’s details
Prior to the commencement of any development or excavation works, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be notified in writing of the name and contractor licence number of the owner/builder intending to carry out the approved works.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
7. Sediment controls
Prior to any work commencing on site, sediment and erosion control measures shall be installed along the contour immediately downslope of any future disturbed areas.
The form of the sediment controls to be installed on the site shall be determined by reference to the Landcom manual ‘Managing Urban Stormwater: Soils and Construction’. The erosion controls shall be maintained in an operational condition until the development activities have been completed and the site fully stabilised. Sediment shall be removed from the sediment controls following each heavy or prolonged rainfall period.
Reason: To preserve and enhance the natural environment.
8. Erosion and drainage management
Earthworks and/or demolition of any existing buildings shall not commence until an erosion and sediment control plan is submitted to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority. The plan shall comply with the guidelines set out in the NSW Department of Housing manual "Managing Urban Stormwater: Soils and Construction" certificate. Erosion and sediment control works shall be implemented in accordance with the erosion and sediment control plan.
Reason: To preserve and enhance the natural environment.
9. Tree protection fencing
To preserve the following tree/s, no work shall commence until the area beneath their canopy is fenced off at the specified radius from the trunk/s to prevent any activities, storage or the disposal of materials within the fenced area. The fence/s shall be maintained intact until the completion of all demolition/building work on site.
Reason: To protect existing trees during the construction phase.
10. Tree protective fencing type galvanised mesh
The tree protection fencing shall be constructed of galvanised pipe at 2.4 metres spacing and connected by securely attached chain mesh fencing to a minimum height of 1.8 metres in height prior to work commencing.
Reason: To protect existing trees during construction phase.
11. Tree protection signage
Prior to works commencing, tree protection signage is to be attached to each tree protection zone, displayed in a prominent position and the sign repeated at 10 metres intervals or closer where the fence changes direction. Each sign shall contain in a clearly legible form, the following information:
Tree protection zone.
· This fence has been installed to prevent damage to the trees and their growing environment both above and below ground and access is restricted. · Any encroachment not previously approved within the tree protection zone shall be the subject of an arborist's report. · The arborist's report shall provide proof that no other alternative is available. · The Arborist's report shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority for further consultation with Council. · The name, address, and telephone number of the developer.
Reason: To protect existing trees during the construction phase.
12. Tree protection mulching
Prior to works commencing and throughout construction, the area of the tree protection zone is to be mulched to a depth of 100mm with composted organic material being 75% Eucalyptus leaf litter and 25% wood.
Reason: To protect existing trees during the construction phase.
13. Trunk protection
To preserve the following tree/s, no work shall commence until the trunk/s are protected by the placement of 2.0 metres lengths of 50 x 100mm hardwood timbers spaced at 150mm centres and secured by 2mm wire at 300mm wide spacing over suitable protective padding material. The trunk protection shall be maintained intact until the completion of all work on site.
Any damage to the tree/s shall be treated immediately by an experienced Horticulturist/Arborist, with minimum qualification of Horticulture Certificate or Tree Surgery Certificate and a report detailing the works carried out shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority:
Reason: To protect existing trees during the construction phase.
14. Tree fencing inspection
Upon installation of the required tree protection measures, an inspection of the site by the Principal Certifying Authority is required to verify that tree protection measures comply with all relevant conditions.
Reason: To protect existing trees during the construction phase.
15. Construction waste management plan
Prior to the commencement of any works, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a waste management plan, prepared by a suitably qualified person, has been prepared in accordance with Council’s Waste Management controls in the Ku-ring-gai Development Control Plan.
The plan shall address all issues identified in the DCP, including but not limited to: the estimated volume of waste and method for disposal for the construction and operation phases of the development.
Note: The plan shall be provided to the Certifying Authority.
Reason: To ensure appropriate management of construction waste.
Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of the construction certificate:
16. Project ecologist/bush regenerator
Prior to the issue of any Construction Certificate, a Bushland Management Plan is to be prepared and submitted to and approved by Certifying Authority for the management of the protection of the endangered ecological community. A copy is also to be provided to Council’s Ecological Assessment Officer.
The Bushland Management Plan shall address habitat values, threats and ameliorative measures to ensure protection of the onsite Sydney Turpentine Iornbark Forest within the existing and newly created lot.
The Bushland Management Plan must be prepared by an appropriately qualified professional. The plan must be in accordance with the Australian Association of Bush Regenerators Guidelines or NSW TAFE Bush Regenerators Certificate Course Guidelines. The primary objective of the plan is weed management, regeneration of the native vegetation and supplementary native plantings for the benefit of the local flora and fauna.
The Project ecologist/Bush regenerator shall have a minimum qualification of TAFE Certificate III in Bush Regeneration or Conservation and Land Management - Natural Area Restoration. He/she shall have at least 4 years experience in the management of native bushland in the Sydney region. Details of the arborist including name, business name and contact details shall be provided to the Principal Certifying Authority with a copy to Council.
Reason: To ensure the protection of existing biodiversity values of the site.
17. Nest boxes
Prior to works commencing two nest boxes, comprising 1 small mammal & 1 medium mammal, shall be installed within the retained trees within the site. The nest boxes shall be constructed of durable wood material (marine ply) and installed at a minimum height of 6 metres from the ground and positioned under the direction of a qualified ecologist.
The qualified ecologist must hold an Animal Ethics Permit from the Office of Environment & Heritage and a wildlife licence under section 132C of the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 issued by the Office of Environment and Heritage.
Reason: To ensure protection of fauna species.
18. Deletion of plan notation
The submitted subdivision plan #PS14122-C Rev C dated 30/09/2016 has a notation stating that ‘Final location of easements, subject to on site direction by Dr Peter Bacon, Engineer, WRT Infiltration Wetland’.
This notation shall be deleted from the plans. The location of the easement shall be in accordance with the location on the plan.
Reason: Certainty surrounding environmental outcomes on the site.
19. Amendments to approved landscape plan
Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the approved landscape plans, listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, have been amended in accordance with the requirements of this condition as well as other conditions of this consent:
The above landscape plan(s) shall be amended as follows:
· The proposed planting of two Hymenospermum flavum (Native Frangipani) shall be replaced with Angophora costata (Sydney Red Gum) of the same pot size.
Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the landscape plan has been amended as required by this condition.
Note: An amended plan, prepared by a landscape architect or qualified landscape designer, shall be submitted to the Certifying Authority.
Reason: To ensure adequate landscaping of the site
20. Amendments to approved engineering plans
Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the approved engineering plan(s), listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, have been amended in accordance with the requirements of this condition as well as other conditions of this consent:
The engineering plans Drawing No. CE14122-C Sheets 1 to 7 dated 28/02/17 prepared by Chase Burke Harvey shall be amended as follows:
1. The driveway is to be a minimum of 5.5 metres in width for a minimum distance of 6 metres from the site frontage to Killeaton Street. A minimum 1 metre setback along the western boundary is required to allow suitable planting.
2. The double hard stand area in front of the existing dwelling is to be deleted. On-site parking for the existing dwelling is to be accommodated within the existing garage and the proposed hard stand to the south of the existing garage.
3. The retaining wall in front of the existing garage and the retaining wall around the driveway are to be deleted. The proposed driveway is to be constructed on top of the existing grades enabling vehicular access to the existing garage.
4. Any necessary longsections and cross sections are to be amended to reflect the proposed changes above.
Note: An amended engineering plan, prepared by a qualified engineer shall be submitted to the Certifying Authority.
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
21. Long service levy
In accordance with Section 109F(i) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act a Construction Certificate shall not be issued until any long service levy payable under Section 34 of the Building and Construction Industry Long Service Payments Act 1986 (or where such levy is payable by instalments, the first instalment of the levy) has been paid. Council is authorised to accept payment. Where payment has been made elsewhere, proof of payment is to be provided to Council.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
22. Builder’s indemnity insurance
The applicant, builder, developer or person who does the work on this development, must arrange builder’s indemnity insurance and submit the certificate of insurance in accordance with the requirements of Part 6 of the Home Building Act 1989 to the Certifying Authority for endorsement of the plans accompanying the Construction Certificate.
It is the responsibility of the applicant, builder or developer to arrange the builder's indemnity insurance for residential building work over the value of $20,000. The builder's indemnity insurance does not apply to commercial or industrial building work or to residential work valued at less than $20,000, nor to work undertaken by persons holding an owner/builder's permit issued by the Department of Fair Trading (unless the owner/builder's property is sold within 7 years of the commencement of the work).
Reason: Statutory requirement.
23. Driveway crossing levels
Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, driveway and associated footpath levels for any new, reconstructed or extended sections of driveway crossings between the property boundary and road alignment must be obtained from Ku-ring-gai Council. Such levels are only able to be issued by Council under the Roads Act 1993. All footpath crossings, laybacks and driveways are to be constructed according to Council's specifications "Construction of Gutter Crossings and Footpath Crossings".
Specifications are issued with alignment levels after completing the necessary application form at Customer Services and payment of the assessment fee. When completing the request for driveway levels application from Council, the applicant must attach a copy of the relevant development application drawing which indicates the position and proposed level of the proposed driveway at the boundary alignment.
This development consent is for works wholly within the property. Development consent does not imply approval of footpath or driveway levels, materials or location within the road reserve, regardless of whether this information is shown on the development application plans. The grading of such footpaths or driveways outside the property shall comply with Council's standard requirements. The suitability of the grade of such paths or driveways inside the property is the sole responsibility of the applicant and the required alignment levels fixed by Council may impact upon these levels.
The construction of footpaths and driveways outside the property in materials other than those approved by Council is not permitted.
Reason: To provide suitable vehicular access without disruption to pedestrian and vehicular traffic.
Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of the construction certificate or prior to demolition, excavation or construction (whichever comes first):
24. Infrastructure damage security bond and inspection fee
To ensure that any damage to Council property as a result of construction activity is rectified in a timely matter:
(a) All work or activity undertaken pursuant to this development consent must be undertaken in a manner to avoid damage to Council property and must not jeopardise the safety of any person using or occupying the adjacent public areas.
(b) The applicant, builder, developer or any person acting in reliance on this consent shall be responsible for making good any damage to Council property and for the removal from Council property of any waste bin, building materials, sediment, silt, or any other material or article.
(c) The Infrastructure damage security bond and infrastructure inspection fee must be paid to Council by the applicant prior to both the issue of the Construction Certificate and the commencement of any earthworks or construction.
(d) In consideration of payment of the infrastructure damage security bond and infrastructure inspection fee, Council will undertake such inspections of Council Property as Council considers necessary and will also undertake, on behalf of the applicant, such restoration work to Council property, if any, that Council considers necessary as a consequence of the development. The provision of such restoration work by the Council does not absolve any person of the responsibilities contained in (a) to (b) above. Restoration work to be undertaken by Council referred to in this condition is limited to work that can be undertaken by Council at a cost of not more than the Infrastructure damage security bond payable pursuant to this condition.
(e) In this condition:
“Council property” includes any road, footway, footpath paving, kerbing, guttering, crossings, street furniture, seats, letter bins, trees, shrubs, lawns, mounds, bushland, and similar structures or features on any road or public road within the meaning of the Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) or any public place; and
“Infrastructure damage security bond and infrastructure inspection fee” means the Infrastructure damage security bond and infrastructure inspection fee as calculated in accordance with the Schedule of Fees & Charges adopted by Council as at the date of payment and the cost of any inspections required by the Council of Council property associated with this condition.
Reason: To maintain public infrastructure.
25. Section 94 development contributions - other than identified centres (For DAs determined on or after 19 December 2010).
This development is subject to a development contribution calculated in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010, being a s94 Contributions Plan in effect under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, as follows:
The contribution shall be paid to Council prior to the issue of any Construction Certificate, Linen Plan, Certificate of Subdivision or Occupation Certificate whichever comes first in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010.
The contributions specified above are subject to indexation and may vary at the time of payment in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 to reflect changes in the consumer price index and housing price index. Prior to payment, please contact Council directly to verify the current payable contributions.
Copies of Council’s Contribution Plans can be viewed at Council Chambers, 818 Pacific Hwy Gordon or on Council’s website at www.kmc.nsw.gov.au.
Contributions outside the designated centres may be subject to a maximum contribution total in accordance with the s94E Direction issued by the Minister for Planning dated 21 August 2012, for so long as it remains legally in force. If the total amount above is an exact multiple of $20,000 then the contributions calculated in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 exceeded the maximum contribution payable and have been capped. If the process of inflation carries the contribution above over the maximum amount permitted by the s94E Direction prior to payment, the amount will be limited at time of receipt. Please contact Council to verify the total contributions payable prior to payment.
Reason: To ensure the provision, extension or augmentation of the Key Community Infrastructure identified in Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 that will, or is likely to be, required as a consequence of the development.
Conditions to be satisfied during the demolition, excavation and construction phases:
26. Road opening permit
The opening of any footway, roadway, road shoulder or any part of the road reserve shall not be carried out without a road opening permit being obtained from Council (upon payment of the required fee) beforehand.
Reason: Statutory requirement (Roads Act 1993 Section 138) and to maintain the integrity of Council’s infrastructure.
27. Prescribed conditions
The applicant shall comply with any relevant prescribed conditions of development consent under clause 98 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation. For the purposes of section 80A (11) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, the following conditions are prescribed in relation to a development consent for development that involves any building work:
· the work must be carried out in accordance with the requirements of the Building Code of Australia · in the case of residential building work for which the Home Building Act 1989 requires there to be a contract of insurance in force in accordance with Part 6 of that Act, that such a contract of insurance is in force before any works commence · if the development involves an excavation that extends below the level of the base of the footings of a building, structure or work (including any structure or work within a road or rail corridor) on adjoining land, the person having the benefit of the development consent must, at the person’s own expense:
(a) protect and support the building, structure or work from possible damage from the excavation, and (b) where necessary, underpin the building, structure or work to prevent any such damage.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
28. Hours of work
Demolition, construction work and deliveries of building material and equipment must not take place outside the hours of 7.00am to 5.00pm Monday to Friday and 8.00am to 12 noon Saturday. No work and no deliveries are to take place on Sundays and public holidays.
Excavation using machinery must be limited to between 7.00am and 5.00pm Monday to Friday, with a respite break of 45 minutes between 12 noon and 1.00pm. No excavation using machinery is to occur on Saturdays, Sundays or public holidays.
Where it is necessary for works to occur outside of these hours (ie) placement of concrete for large floor areas on large residential/commercial developments or where building processes require the use of oversized trucks and/or cranes that are restricted by the RTA from travelling during daylight hours to deliver, erect or remove machinery, tower cranes, pre-cast panels, beams, tanks or service equipment to or from the site, approval for such activities will be subject to the issue of an "outside of hours works permit" from Council as well as notification of the surrounding properties likely to be affected by the proposed works.
Note: Failure to obtain a permit to work outside of the approved hours will result in on the spot fines being issued.
Reason: To ensure reasonable standards of amenity for occupants of neighbouring properties.
29. Approved plans to be on site
A copy of all approved and certified plans, specifications and documents incorporating conditions of consent and certification (including the Construction Certificate if required for the work) shall be kept on site at all times during the demolition, excavation and construction phases and must be readily available to any officer of Council or the Principal Certifying Authority.
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
30. Site notice
A site notice shall be erected on the site prior to any work commencing and shall be displayed throughout the works period.
The site notice must:
· be prominently displayed at the boundaries of the site for the purposes of informing the public that unauthorised entry to the site is not permitted · display project details including, but not limited to the details of the builder, Principal Certifying Authority and structural engineer · be durable and weatherproof · display the approved hours of work, the name of the site/project manager, the responsible managing company (if any), its address and 24 hour contact phone number for any inquiries, including construction/noise complaint are to be displayed on the site notice · be mounted at eye level on the perimeter hoardings/fencing and is to state that unauthorised entry to the site is not permitted
Reason: To ensure public safety and public information.
31. Dust control
During excavation, demolition and construction, adequate measures shall be taken to prevent dust from affecting the amenity of the neighbourhood. The following measures must be adopted:
· physical barriers shall be erected at right angles to the prevailing wind direction or shall be placed around or over dust sources to prevent wind or activity from generating dust · earthworks and scheduling activities shall be managed to coincide with the next stage of development to minimise the amount of time the site is left cut or exposed · all materials shall be stored or stockpiled at the best locations · the ground surface should be dampened slightly to prevent dust from becoming airborne but should not be wet to the extent that run-off occurs · all vehicles carrying spoil or rubble to or from the site shall at all times be covered to prevent the escape of dust · all equipment wheels shall be washed before exiting the site using manual or automated sprayers and drive-through washing bays · gates shall be closed between vehicle movements and shall be fitted with shade cloth · cleaning of footpaths and roadways shall be carried out daily
Reason: To protect the environment and amenity of surrounding properties.
32. Use of road or footpath
During excavation, demolition and construction phases, no building materials, plant or the like are to be stored on the road or footpath without written approval being obtained from Council beforehand. The pathway shall be kept in a clean, tidy and safe condition during building operations. Council reserves the right, without notice, to rectify any such breach and to charge the cost against the applicant/owner/builder, as the case may be.
Reason: To ensure safety and amenity of the area.
33. Guarding excavations
All excavation, demolition and construction works shall be properly guarded and protected with hoardings or fencing to prevent them from being dangerous to life and property.
Reason: To ensure public safety.
34. Toilet facilities
During excavation, demolition and construction phases, toilet facilities are to be provided, on the work site, at the rate of one toilet for every 20 persons or part of 20 persons employed at the site.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
35. Protection of public places
If the work involved in the erection, demolition or construction of the development is likely to cause pedestrian or vehicular traffic in a public place to be obstructed or rendered inconvenient, or building involves the enclosure of a public place, a hoarding or fence must be erected between the work site and the public place.
If necessary, a hoarding is to be erected, sufficient to prevent any substance from, or in connection with, the work falling into the public place.
The work site must be kept lit between sunset and sunrise if it is likely to be hazardous to persons in the public place.
Any hoarding, fence or awning is to be removed when the work has been completed.
Reason: To protect public places.
36. Construction signage
All construction signs must comply with the following requirements:
· are not to cover any mechanical ventilation inlet or outlet vent · are not illuminated, self-illuminated or flashing at any time · are located wholly within a property where construction is being undertaken · refer only to the business(es) undertaking the construction and/or the site at which the construction is being undertaken · are restricted to one such sign per property · do not exceed 2.5m2 · are removed within 14 days of the completion of all construction works
Reason: To ensure compliance with Council's controls regarding signage.
37. Road reserve safety
All public footways and roadways fronting and adjacent to the site must be maintained in a safe condition at all times during the course of the development works. Construction materials must not be stored in the road reserve. A safe pedestrian circulation route and a pavement/route free of trip hazards must be maintained at all times on or adjacent to any public access ways fronting the construction site. Where public infrastructure is damaged, repair works must be carried out when and as directed by Council officers. Where pedestrian circulation is diverted on to the roadway or verge areas, clear directional signage and protective barricades must be installed in accordance with AS1742-3 (1996) “Traffic Control Devices for Work on Roads”. If pedestrian circulation is not satisfactorily maintained across the site frontage, and action is not taken promptly to rectify the defects, Council may undertake proceedings to stop work.
Reason: To ensure safe public footways and roadways during construction.
38. Services
Where required, the adjustment or inclusion of any new utility service facilities must be carried out by the applicant and in accordance with the requirements of the relevant utility authority. These works shall be at no cost to Council. It is the applicants’ full responsibility to make contact with the relevant utility authorities to ascertain the impacts of the proposal upon utility services (including water, phone, gas and the like). Council accepts no responsibility for any matter arising from its approval to this application involving any influence upon utility services provided by another authority.
Reason: Provision of utility services.
39. Erosion control
Temporary sediment and erosion control and measures are to be installed prior to the commencement of any works on the site. These measures must be maintained in working order during construction works up to completion. All sediment traps must be cleared on a regular basis and after each major storm and/or as directed by the Principal Certifying Authority and Council officers.
Reason: To protect the environment from erosion and sedimentation.
40. Arborist’s report
The tree/s to be retained shall be inspected, monitored and treated by a qualified Arborist during and after completion of development works to ensure their long term survival. Regular inspections and documentation from the Arborist to the Principal Certifying Authority are required at the following times or phases of work:
Reason: To ensure protection of existing trees.
41. Treatment of tree roots
If tree roots are required to be severed for the purposes of constructing the approved works, they shall be cut cleanly by hand, by an experienced AQF3 Arborist/Horticulturist. All pruning works shall be undertaken as specified in Australian Standard 4373-2007 - Pruning of Amenity Trees.
Reason: To protect existing trees.
42. Cutting of tree roots
No tree roots of 30mm or greater in diameter located within the specified radius of the trunk/s of the following tree/s shall be severed or injured in the process of any works during the construction period. All pruning works shall be undertaken as specified in Australian Standard 4373-2007 - Pruning of Amenity Trees:
Reason: To protect existing trees.
43. Approved tree works
Approval is given for the following works to be undertaken to trees on the site. ALL trees shall be clearly tagged and identified consistent with the Arboricultural Impact Assessment Report by Bluegum dated September 2016:
Removal or pruning of any other tree on the site is not approved, excluding species exempt under Council’s Tree Preservation Order.
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
44. Hand excavation
All excavation within the specified radius of the trunk/s of the following tree/s shall be hand dug:
Reason: To protect existing trees.
45. Directional drilling/thrust boring
Excavation for the installation of any services within the specified radius of the trunk/s of the following tree/s shall utilise Directional drilling/thrust boring methods under the direct supervision of the Project Arborist. Directional drilling/thrust boring shall be carried out at least 600mm beneath natural ground level to minimise damage to tree/s root system:
Reason: To protect existing trees.
46. No storage of materials beneath trees
No activities, storage or disposal of materials shall take place beneath the canopy of any tree protected under Council's Tree Preservation Order at any time.
Reason: To protect existing trees.
47. Removal of refuse
All builders' refuse, spoil and/or material unsuitable for use in landscape areas shall be removed from the site on completion of the building works.
Reason: To protect the environment.
48. Removal of noxious plants & weeds
All noxious and/or environmental weed species in accordance with Council weed policy shall be removed from the property by ecological sustainable practices prior to the completion of subdivision works:
Reason: To protect the environment.
The following noxious and/or environmental weed species shall be removed from the property prior to completion of building works:
Reason: To protect the environment.
49. On site retention of waste dockets
All demolition, excavation and construction waste dockets are to be retained on site, or at suitable location, in order to confirm which facility received materials generated from the site for recycling or disposal.
· Each docket is to be an official receipt from a facility authorised to accept the material type, for disposal or processing. · This information is to be made available at the request of an Authorised Officer of Council.
Reason: To protect the environment.
Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate:
50. Completion of landscape works
Prior to the release of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that all landscape works, including the removal of all noxious and/or environmental weed species, have been undertaken in accordance with the approved plan(s) and conditions of consent.
Reason: To ensure that the landscape works are consistent with the development consent.
51. Certification of drainage works
Prior to issue of the Final Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that:
· the components of the new drainage system have been installed by a licensed contractor in accordance with the National Plumbing and Drainage Code AS3500.3 (2003) and the Building Code of Australia · the stormwater drainage works have been completed in accordance with the approved Construction Certificate drainage plans and Ku-ring-gai DCP Part 24
Note: Evidence from the plumbing contractor or a qualified civil/hydraulic engineer confirming compliance with this control is to be provided to Council prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate.
Reason: To protect the environment.
52. Sydney Water Section 73 Compliance Certificate
Prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate the Section 73 Sydney water Compliance Certificate must be obtained and submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
53. Certification of as-constructed driveway
Prior to issue of an Final Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that:
· the as-constructed driveway complies with the approved Construction Certificate plans;
· the completed vehicle access and accommodation arrangements comply with Australian Standard 2890.1 - 2004 “Off-Street car parking";
· finished driveway gradients and transitions will not result in the scraping of the underside of cars.
Note: Evidence from a suitably qualified and experienced traffic/civil engineer indicating compliance with the above is to be provided to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the issue of an Final Certificate.
Reason: To ensure that vehicular access and accommodation areas are compliant with the consent.
54. Infrastructure repair
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority must be satisfied that any damaged public infrastructure caused as a result of construction works (including damage caused by, but not limited to, delivery vehicles, waste collection, contractors, sub-contractors, concrete vehicles) is fully repaired to the satisfaction of Council Development Engineer and at no cost to Council.
Reason: To protect public infrastructure.
Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of a Subdivision certificate:
55. Bushland management works
The following works as detailed in the Bushland Management Plan are to be implemented.
· All weeding removal, weed techniques, environmental protection measures and ongoing maintenance works are to be carried out in accordance with the BMP.
· All noxious and environmental weeds are to be removed from the Sydney Turpentine Ironbark Forest community within the site.
· All works at all times within the Sydney Turpentine Ironbark Forest community are to be conducted by a suitably qualified bush regenerator. The minimum qualifications minimum qualifications and experience (for bush regenerator) are a TAFE Certificate 2 in Bushland Regeneration and one year demonstrated experience (for other personnel). In addition the site supervisor is to be eligible for full professional membership of the Australian Association of Bush Regenerators (AABR).
Reason: To ensure the protection and enhancement of Sydney Turpentine Ironbark Forest within the site.
56. Requirements of public authorities for connection to services
Prior to the issue of the Subdivision Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the applicant has complied with the requirements of any public authorities (e.g. Energy Australia, Sydney Water, Telstra Australia, AGL, etc) in regard to the connection, relocation and/or adjustment of the services affected by the proposed subdivision. All costs related to the relocation, adjustment or support of services are the responsibility of the applicant.
Note: Details of compliance with the requirements of any relevant public authorities are to be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority.
Reason: To ensure that services are available to the allotments of land.
57. Infrastructure repair – subdivision works
Prior to issue of the Subdivision Certificate, any infrastructure within the road reserve along the frontage of the subject site or within close proximity, which has been damaged as a result of subdivision works, must be fully repaired to the satisfaction of Council’s Development Engineer and at no cost to Council.
Reason: To protect public infrastructure.
58. Provision of services
Prior to issue of the Subdivision Certificate, separate underground electricity, gas and phone or appropriate conduits for the same, must be provided to each allotment to the satisfaction of the utility provider. A suitably qualified and experienced engineer or surveyor is to provide certification that all new lots have ready underground access to the services of electricity, gas and phone. Alternatively, a letter from the relevant supply authorities stating the same may be submitted to satisfy this condition.
Reason: Access to public utilities.
59. Issue of Subdivision Certificate
The Subdivision Certificate must not be issued until all conditions of development consent have been satisfied and an Final Certificate has been issued by the Principal Certifying Authority.
Reason: To ensure that the development is completed prior to transfer of responsibility for the site and development to another person.
60. Submission of 88b instrument
Prior to the issue of the Subdivision Certificate, the applicant must submit an original instrument under Section 88B of the Conveyancing Act with the plan of subdivision, plus six (6) copies to Council. Ku-ring-gai Council must be named as the authority whose consent is required to release, vary or modify the burdens.
Reason: To create all required easements, rights-of-carriageway, positive covenants, restrictions-on-use or other burdens/benefits as may be required.
61. Sydney Turpentine Ironbark Forest protection - Section 88B instrument
Prior to release of the Subdivision Certificate, a positive covenant and restriction on the use of land are to be created under Section 88B of the Conveyancing Act 1919, burdening Lots with the requirement to maintain the endangered ecological community Sydney Turpentine Ironbark Forest community as identified in the approved Vegetation management plan in perpetuity in accordance with the approved Vegetation management plan Council is to be named as the authority to release, vary or modify the burdens.
Reason: To protect the Sydney Turpentine Ironbark Forest.
62. Submission of plans of subdivision (Torrens title)
For endorsement of the subdivision certificate, the applicant shall submit an original plan of subdivision plus 6 copies, suitable for endorsement by Council. The following details must be submitted with the plan of subdivision and its copies:
a) the endorsement fee current a the time of lodgement b) the 88B instrument plus 6 copies c) a copy of the Occupation Certificate issued for DA0500/16 d) all surveyor’s and/or consulting engineers’ certification(s) required under this subdivision consent e) The Section 73 (Sydney Water) Compliance Certificate for the subdivision. f) Proof of payment of S94 contribution
Council will check the consent conditions on the subdivision. Failure to submit the required information will delay endorsement of the linen plan and may require payment of rechecking fees. Plans and copies of subdivision must not be folded. Council will not accept bonds in lieu of completing subdivision works.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
63. General easement/R.O.W. provision and certification
Prior to issue of the Subdivision Certificate, a registered surveyor is to provide details to Council that all physical structures are fully contained within the proposed allotments or will be fully covered by the proposed burdens upon registration of the final plan of subdivision. Alternatively, where the surveyor is of the opinion that creation of burdens and benefits is not required, then proof to this effect must be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority.
Reason: To ensure that all physical structures are fully contained within the proposed allotments or will be fully covered by the proposed burdens upon registration of the final plan of subdivision.
INTEGRATED/CONCURRENCE REFERRAL CONDITIONS:
64. RMS - (Section 138 of the Roads Act 1993)
1. Any new buildings and structures together with any improvements integral to the future use of the site are to be wholly within the freehold property (unlimited in height or depth), along the Killeaton Street boundary. 2. The design and construction of the gutter crossing on Killeaton Street shall be in accordance with Council standards and requirements. 3. All vehicles are to enter and leave the site in a forward direction. 4. In accordance with AS 2890.1- 2004 (Parking Facilities, Part 1: Off-street car parking), the driveway shall be a minimum of 5.5 metres in width for a minimum distance of 6 metres from the property boundary. 5. A Construction Traffic Management Plan detailing construction vehicle routes, number of trucks, hours of operation, access arrangements and traffic control should be submitted to Council for approval prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate. 6 Sight distances from the proposed vehicular crossings to vehicles on Killeaton Street are to be in accordance with the Austroads 'Guide to Traffic Engineering Practice, Part 5: Intersections at Grade, Section 6.2 - Sight Distance' and AS 2890. Vegetation and proposed landscaping/fencing must not hinder sight lines to and from the vehicular crossings to motorists, pedestrians and cyclists.
65. RFS - Bush Fire Safety Authority (Section 100B of the 'Rural Fires Act 1997)
This response is to be deemed a bush fire safety authority as required under section 100B of the 'Rural Fires Act 1997' and is issued subject to the following numbered conditions:
Asset Protection Zones
The intent of measures is to provide sufficient space and maintain reduced fuel loads so as to ensure radiant heat levels of buildings are below critical limits and to prevent direct flame contact with a building. To achieve this, the following conditions shall apply:
1. At the issue of subdivision certificate and in perpetuity, the proposed Lot 31 shall be managed as an inner protection area (IPA) as outlined within section 4.1.3 and Appendix 5 of ‘Planning for Bush Fire Protection 2006’ and the NSW Rural Fire Service's document 'Standards for asset protection zones'.
2. At the issue of subdivision certificate and in perpetuity, the property around the existing dwelling on proposed Lot 32 shall be managed as follows:
● North up to property boundary metres as an Inner Protection Area. ● East up to property boundary as an Inner Protection Area. ● South for a distance of 10 metres as an Inner Protection Area. ● West up to property boundary as an Inner Protection Area.
Requirements for an Inner Protection Area are outlined within section 4.1.3 and appendix 5 of ‘Planning for Bush Fire Protection 2006’ (PBP) and the NSW Rural Fire Service's document ‘Standards for asset protection zones’.
Water and utilities
The intent of measures is to provide adequate services of water for the protection of buildings during and after the passage of a bush fire, and to locate gas and electricity so as not to contribute to the risk of fire to a building. To achieve this, the following conditions shall apply:
3. New provisions for water, electricity and gas services shall comply with section 4.1.3 of ‘Planning for Bush Fire Protection 2006’.
Access
The intent of measures for property access is to provide safe access to/from the public road system for fire fighters providing property protection during a bush fire and for occupants faced with evacuation. To achieve this, the following conditions shall apply:
4. Proposed property access road shall comply with section 4.1.3 (2) of 'Planning for Bush Fire Protection 2006'.
Design and construction
The intent of measures is that buildings are designed and constructed to withstand the potential impacts of bush fire attack. To achieve this, the following conditions shall apply:
5. The existing dwelling on proposed Lot 32 is required to be upgraded to improve ember protection. This is to be achieved by enclosing all openings (excluding roof tile spaces) or covering openings with a non-corrosive metal screen. Where applicable, this includes any sub floor areas, openable windows, doors, vents, weepholes and eaves.
Landscaping
6. New landscaping to the site is to comply with the principles of Appendix 5 of 'Planning for Bush Fire Protection 2006'. |
Janice Buteux-Wheeler Executive Assessment Officer |
Shaun Garland Team Leader Development Assessment Central |
Corrie Swanepoel Manager Development Assessment Services |
Michael Miocic Director Development & Regulation |
A1 |
Location sketch |
|
2017/114853 |
|
|
A2 |
Zoning extract |
|
2017/114851 |
|
A3 |
Subdivision plans |
|
2016/289250 |
|
A4 |
Engineering plans |
|
2017/114456 |
|
A5 |
Landscape plan |
|
2016/289258 |
|
A6 |
Flora and fauna assessment report |
|
2016/289172 |
|
A7 |
Arborist report |
|
2016/289179 |
|
A8 |
Bush fire assessment report |
|
2016/289174 |
Ordinary Meeting of Council - 23 May 2017 |
GB.7 / 326 |
|
|
Item GB.7 |
S11257 |
|
21 April 2017 |
Consideration of Submissions - Planning Proposal to amend the KLEP 2015 for the rezoning of 21 Lorne Avenue, Killara
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
purpose of report: |
For Council to consider the submissions received in response to the exhibition of the Planning Proposal to amend to the KLEP 2015 for the rezoning of 21 Lorne Avenue, Killara. |
|
|
background: |
The Planning Proposal was submitted to Council on 29 August 2016. Following the submission of additional information, the review of the Planning Proposal formally commenced on 4 November 2016. On 7 February 2017, Council resolved to forward the Planning Proposal to the Department of Planning and Environment for a Gateway Determination. A Gateway Determination was received on 21 March 2017. |
|
|
comments: |
The Planning Proposal was placed on public exhibition from 6 April 2017 to 5 May 2017. The submissions received have been assessed for Council’s consideration. |
|
|
recommendation: |
That Council adopts the Planning Proposal and makes the plan under delegation. |
Purpose of Report
For Council to consider the submissions received in response to the exhibition of the Planning Proposal to amend to the KLEP 2015 for the rezoning of 21 Lorne Avenue, Killara.
Background
The Planning Proposal for 21 Lorne Avenue, Killara was submitted to Council on 29 August 2016. The Planning Proposal seeks to make the following amendments to the KLEP 2015:
· rezone the site from R2 Low Density Residential to R4 High Density Residential;
· amend the Floor Space Ratio applying to the site from 0.3:1 to 1.3:1;
· amend the Height of Building applying to the site from 9.5m to 17.5m; and
· amend the Lot Size applying to the site from 840sqm to 1200sqm.
The Planning Proposal as submitted was incomplete. Following the submission of additional documentation, the review of the Planning Proposal formally commenced on 4 November 2016.
On 7 February 2017 Council considered a report on the Planning Proposal and resolved:
A. That the Planning Proposal to rezone 21 Lorne Avenue, Killara be sent to the Department of Planning and Environment for a Gateway Determination.
B. That prior to being sent for a Gateway Determination, the Planning Proposal be amended by the applicant as outlined in the body of this report.
C. That Council requests the plan-making delegation under Section 23 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 for this Planning Proposal.
D. That upon receipt of a Gateway Determination, the exhibition and consultation process be carried out in accordance with the requirements of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and the requirement of the Gateway Determination.
E. That a report be brought back to Council at the conclusion of the exhibition period.
Gateway Determination
The applicant amended the Planning Proposal in accordance with Resolution B (above), as follows:
· Part 2 of the Planning Proposal amended to detail the exact amendments sought to the KLEP 2015;
· Part 3 of the Planning Proposal amended to identify and demonstrate consistency with specific objectives and actions within A Plan for Growing Sydney, to demonstrate consistency with the Draft North District Plan and to include reference to the Urban Design Study as part of the justification and included as an appendix; and
· mapping amended to clearly identify the land to which the planning proposal applies.
The amended Planning Proposal was submitted to the Department of Planning and Environment on 22 February 2017 requesting a Gateway Determination. Council also requested the plan-making delegation in accordance with Resolution C (above).
The Department of Planning and Environment issued a Gateway Determination on 20 March 2017. The Department also issued authorisation for Council to exercise delegation to make this plan. The Gateway Determination is included at Attachment A1.
The Gateway Determination required a number of amendments to the Planning Proposal prior to community consultation, as follows:
1. Prior to community consultation, Council is to amend the planning proposal as follows:
a. Amend the planning proposal cover page to include Council’s logo and address details to reflect Councils adoption of the proposal;
b. Identify the exact amendments to the development standards in Part 2 of the planning proposal (page 2);
c. Include the findings of the Heritage Impact Statement in addressing Section 117 Direction 2.3 Heritage Conservation and remove the repeated paragraph in the table on page 9;
d. Include the relevant Section 117 Direction numbers in the table on page 13 of the planning proposal;
e. Include Council’s comments on traffic impacts from Councils Meeting Report in the planning proposal;
f. Identify an exhibition period of 28 days in Part 5 of the planning proposal and remove the templates instructions (page 19); and
g. Include the appropriate project timeline dates in Part 6 of the planning proposal (page 20).
The amended proposal is to be submitted to the Department for information purposes.
Council amended the Planning Proposal as required by Condition 1(a)-(g) of the Gateway Determination and submitted the amended Planning Proposal to the Department of Planning and Environment on 28 March 2017 for information purposes.
Public Exhibition
The Planning Proposal was placed on exhibition from 6 April 2017 – 5 May 2017, in accordance with the conditions of the Gateway Determination.
The exhibition material included the amended Planning Proposal (Attachment A2) and the following appendices:
· Appendix A – Checklist of Consistency with Section 117 Directions and SEPPs (Attachment A3);
· Appendix B – Heritage Impact Statement, Curio Projects (Attachment A4);
· Appendix C – Yield Analysis, Giles Tribe Architects (Attachment A5);
· Appendix D – Urban Design Study and Analysis (Attachment A6).
Comments
State Agency Consultation
The Gateway Determination required consultation with the following public authorities under Section 56(2)(d) of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979:
· Office of Environment and Heritage;
· Transport for NSW;
· Transport for NSW – Sydney Trains;
· Transport for NSW – Roads and Maritime Services;
· Sydney Water;
· Energy Australia;
· Telstra.
The public authorities were provided with a copy of the planning proposal and given 21 days to provide comment from the 28 March 2017.
Responses were received from Office of Environment and Heritage (Planning Team), Office of Environment and Heritage (Heritage Division), Roads and Maritime Services and Transport for NSW. Copies of the responses are included at Attachment A7.
Office of Environment and Heritage – Planning Team
The Office of Environment and Heritage Greater Sydney Planning Team had no comments on the Planning Proposal. However, noted that the Heritage Division may wish to comment separately.
Comment: The Planning Proposal was separately referred to the Office of Environment and Heritage (Heritage Division) for their comment on the planning proposal (see below).
Office of Environment and Heritage – Heritage Division
The response from the Heritage Division notes that the subject site is located on the northern side of Lorne Avenue, currently existing on the site is a two storey residential dwelling house built c.1912. The site is currently zoned R2 and the sites adjoining to the north, west and east are zoned R4 allowing for high density residential development up to 5 storeys.
The response notes the history of the heritage listing on the site, and the Perumal Murphy Alessi review of heritage status of heritage interface sites impacted by adjoining high density zones.
The response also notes the Complying Development Certificate issued on 1 December 2016 under Part 4 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 for the demolition of the dwelling.
The response notes that the site is located in the vicinity of locally listed heritage items I306 (20 Lorne Avenue), I305 (14 Lorne Avenue), I304 (10 Lorne Avenue), I303 (8 Lorne Avenue) and I302 (6 Lorne Avenue). The site is also located opposite HCA C24 Marian Street.
The Heritage Division considered that the proposal is consistent with the current zoning and character of the northern sector of Lorne Avenue, and is unlikely to have an additional unacceptable impact on the heritage significance of the Marian Street Conservation Area.
Roads and Maritime Services
The response from RMS raises no objections to the proposal as the associated traffic generation and potential traffic impact to Pacific Highway is relatively minor and does not require further detailed traffic assessment and/or transport infrastructure upgrades to the Pacific Highway/Lorne Avenue intersection.
Transport for NSW
Transport for NSW reviewed the submitted information and has no comment on the planning proposal.
Community Submissions
A total of 12 submissions were received from the community in response to the public exhibition of the planning proposal. A summary table of the submissions received and Council comment in response is included at Attachment A8.
The following are some of the key themes and matters raised in the submissions and Council comment on those matters:
· Street already overcrowded, enough high density in neighbourhood
Comment: In order to provide for Sydney’s growing population and the State Government dwelling targets – areas in Ku-ring-gai have been rezoned to allow for medium and high density housing. These areas are generally located along the railway line and Pacific Highway – close to public transport and existing infrastructure. The rezoning of 21 Lorne Avenue to R4 High Density Residential is consistent with the zoning of the surrounding properties.
The northern side of Lorne Avenue (except for 21 Lorne Avenue) is already zoned R4 High Density Residential – and sites have been redeveloped into 5 storey apartment blocks. The southern side of Lorne Avenue is a Heritage Conservation Area, and contains a number of heritage items – it is unlikely that the southern side of Lorne Avenue will be redeveloped and will remain as low density in character.
· Rezoning will impact on infrastructure such as water pressure, telecommunications, sewage, stormwater, schools, parks, trains and roads. Already lack of infrastructure and amenities failing to serve greatly increased population.
Comment: With regards to telecommunications, water pressure and sewage, the planning proposal was forwarded to Sydney Water and to Telstra under s56 of the EP&A Act 1979. No response has been received from these agencies. Sydney Water may require their assets to be adjusted to accommodate future development.
With regards to roads, the expected traffic generation rate of 0.3 trips per dwelling (2-way) during the peak hour is equal to approximately 24 trips, or roughly 1 trip every 2 minutes. Additional 24 trips in the peak hour is unlikely to have significant additional impact on the surrounding road network. Council is monitoring traffic volumes in Lorne Avenue to assess any effects from more recent high density residential developments. The RMS has noted that the planning proposal would not require any transport infrastructure upgrades to the Pacific Highway/Lorne Avenue intersection.
The planning proposal was forwarded to Sydney Trains under s56 of the EP&A Act 1979. No response was received.
For any future development approved on the site, Council would levy a contribution from the developers towards the costs of providing and augmenting local services and facilities that are required because of their development.
· Traffic and parking extremely busy in the street. People park in street to access station and residents from units with multiple cars park on street. Rezoning will result in additional cars parking on street and increase to traffic congestion. Traffic numbers quoted in Council report are from 2015 – there have been more units built since this time.
Comment: The expected traffic generation rate of 0.3 trips per dwelling (2-way) during the peak hour is equal to approximately 24 trips, or roughly 1 trip every 2 minutes. Additional 24 trips in the peak hour is unlikely to have significant additional impact on the surrounding road network. Council is monitoring traffic volumes in Lorne Avenue to assess any effects from more recent high density residential developments.
Narrow sections of Culworth Avenue have weekday am restrictions to minimize commuter parking and improve traffic flow during the morning peak.
New kerb ramps and a pedestrian refuge is being constructed in Culworth Avenue at the intersection with Lorne Avenue, to improve pedestrian access to/from Killara railway station.
The recorded 85% speed in Lorne Avenue (54km/h average, 2-way indicates the majority of vehicles travelling in Lorne Avenue travel at around (or below) the sign posted speed limit of 50km/h. This is a relatively good result for a straight length of local road.
The Ku-ring-gai DCP parking requirements for high density residential developments within 400m of railway stations is deemed to be adequate, and residents who choose to own more cars than car spaces allocated to them and park on street would have to compete with commuters or risk an infringement if parking in a time restricted zone.
Council staff are also developing a car share vehicle policy. Car share provide alternatives to residents owning more vehicles than they have allocated parking spaces on site, and therefore reduce demand for on-street parking spaces.
· Development will result in amenity impacts to neighbouring properties including overshadowing, privacy and noise.
Comment: This is a planning proposal for the rezoning of 21 Lorne Avenue to R4 and amendments to the development standards only, and as such does not consider the detailed design matters. It is not a Development Application for the construction of a building. These matters (overshadowing, privacy and noise) would be assessed as part of the Development Application process.
· 21 Lorne Avenue should not have been delisted. House has heritage significance and should be re-listed as a heritage item.
Comment: Council resolved to delist the property at 21 Lorne Avenue as part of the KLEP 2015. The rationale for the delisting was based on the heritage assessment undertaken by Perumal Murphy Alessi - Heritage Status and Context Review of 14 sites in Ku-ring-gai (May 2006). This assessment recommended that the heritage listing be removed from the property. The arguments for delisting of the site were the impact of development on curtilage and setting.
The original boundary of the lot on which the house was built was subdivided in 1958 to create 4 lots. This significantly reduced the curtilage and resulted in visual encroachment on the site with very narrow setback, particularly on the western side. Following the subdivision, the house did retain significance as a garden setting was still in place and the neighbouring properties did not exceed two storeys.
The opinion of the consultants and the Council interface assessment concluded the curtilage would be impacted by future (and now some existing) R4 development. The reduced curtilage as a result of the 1958 subdivision would now result in 5 storey neighbours on the up zoned sites, surrounding the house on 3 sides. As a result of the lost setting and diminished curtilage the house was removed from Council’s heritage list.
The Assessment of Significance by Perumal Murphy Alessi Heritage Consultants is included as Attachment A9.
The Section 56 response from the Office of Environment and Heritage – Heritage Division notes the history of the heritage listing on the site, and the Perumal Murphy Alessi review of heritage status of heritage interface sites impacted by adjoining high density zones.
· Development will result in loss of environment and animals. Loss of trees.
Comment: This is a Planning Proposal and only considers amendments to the Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan 2015 – it is not a development application and does give approval for the construction of buildings or removal of trees and vegetation.
The impacts of any future development proposed the site on the environment, including removal of trees and vegetation would be considered through the Development Application process. It is noted that 21 Lorne Avenue is not mapped as Biodiversity Significance under the KLEP 2015.
· Shortage of local businesses in area – house should be rezoned to allow for remodelling of house for a small business (e.g. convenience store, café, hairdresser, doctor)
Comment: The proposed R4 High Density Residential zone permits the following land uses which may support the development and use of ‘small business’:
· child care centres;
· neighbourhood shops;
· shop top housing;
· Home businesses.
It is up to the land owner to put forward a development application to Council. Each zone specifies a number of uses permitted within that zone. Council cannot force a landowner to develop their site for a certain purpose.
integrated planning and reporting
Places, Spaces and Infrastructure
Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective |
Delivery Program Term Achievement |
Operational Plan Task |
P2.1 A robust planning framework is in place to deliver quality design outcomes and maintain the identity and character of Ku-ring-gai |
Strategies, plans and processes are in place to effectively manage the impact of new development
|
Continue to review existing strategies and plans
|
Governance Matters
The process for the preparation and implementation of Planning Proposals is governed by the provisions contained in the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000.
Council sought the plan-making delegation under Section 23 of the EP&A Act 1979 to finalise the planning proposal. In issuing the Gateway Determination, the Department of Planning considered the nature of the planning proposal and decided to issue authorisation to Council to exercise delegation to make this plan.
Risk Management
This is a privately initiated planning proposal. Council needs to determine its position on this Planning Proposal. Council risks damage to its reputation if it does not undertake strategic land use planning in an effective and timely manner.
Financial Considerations
The Planning Proposal was subject to the relevant application fee under Council’s 2015/2016 Fees and Charges Schedule. The Planning Proposal was also subject to a further fee following the issue of the Gateway Determination for the advertisement of the Planning Proposal, in line with Councils 2015/2016 Fees and Charges Schedule. The cost for the review, assessment and advertisement of the Planning Proposal is covered by this fee.
Social Considerations
The site is well integrated with the surrounding public transport and pedestrian routes. The site is located within close proximity to the North Shore railway line and Killara Station. The increase in residential density will have access to facilities shared by the local community.
Environmental Considerations
The site is not identified as having Biodiversity or Riparian mapping under the KLEP 2015.
Community Consultation
The planning proposal was publically exhibited from 6 April 2017 to 5 May 2017 in accordance with the requirements of the Gateway Determination. The public exhibition was also advertised in the North Shore Times and on Councils website.
The exhibition material was available on Councils website, and a hard copy was available at Customer Service.
All persons who made a formal submission were notified of this matter being reported to Council.
Internal Consultation
This report has been referred to relevant sections of Council for comment.
Summary
The Planning Proposal seeks to make the following amendments to the KLEP 2015:
· Rezone the site from R2 Low Density Residential to R4 High Density Residential;
· Amend the Floor Space Ratio applying to the site from 0.3:1 to 1.3:1;
· Amend the Height of Building applying to the site from 9.5m to 17.5m;
· Amend the Lot Size applying to the site from 840sqm to 1200sqm.
The Planning Proposal was publically exhibited from 6 April 2017 to 5 May 2017.
This report considers and assesses the submissions made in response to the public exhibition of the planning proposal, from both the community and from the relevant state agencies. The report recommends that the Council adopt the planning proposal and makes the plan under delegation.
A. That Council adopts the Planning Proposal for the rezoning of 21 Lorne Avenue, Killara
B. That Councils proceeds to make the Plan, under delegated authority issued by the Department of Planning and Environment under Section 59(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.
C. That those who made submissions be notified of Council’s decision.
|
Alexandra Plumb Urban Planner |
Craige Wyse Team Leader Urban Planning |
Antony Fabbro Manager Urban & Heritage Planning |
Andrew Watson Director Strategy & Environment |
A1 |
Gateway Determination - 21 Lorne Avenue Killara |
|
2017/073140 |
|
|
A2 |
Planning Proposal - 21 Lorne Avenue Killara - Amended as Per Gateway Determination March 2017 |
|
2017/080825 |
|
A3 |
Appendix A - s117 Directions and SEPPs |
|
2017/128018 |
|
A4 |
Heritage Impact Statement - 21 Lorne Avenue Killara |
|
2016/305168 |
|
A5 |
Development Yield Analysis |
|
2016/284594 |
|
A6 |
Urban Design Study and Analysis |
|
2016/304798 |
|
A7 |
State Agency Responses - 21 Lorne Avenue |
|
2017/128029 |
|
A8 |
Submission Summary Table |
|
2017/128435 |
|
A9 |
Perumal Murphy Alessi - 21 Lorne Avenue, Killara - Heritage Status and Context Review of 14 Sites in Ku-ring-gai May 2006 |
|
2013/233256 |
APPENDIX No: 2 - Planning Proposal - 21 Lorne Avenue Killara - Amended as Per Gateway Determination March 2017 |
|
Item No: GB.7 |
APPENDIX No: 9 - Perumal Murphy Alessi - 21 Lorne Avenue, Killara - Heritage Status and Context Review of 14 Sites in Ku-ring-gai May 2006 |
|
Item No: GB.7 |
Ordinary Meeting of Council - 23 May 2017 |
GB.8 / 441 |
|
|
Item GB.8 |
S06785/3 |
|
21 September 2016 |
Update Report on the Development Contributions System
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
purpose of report: |
The purpose of this report is to provide Council with an overview of key activities and highlights in the development contributions system over the past six months and anticipated actions and highlights for the coming twelve months. |
|
|
background: |
Development contributions are a whole-of-Council activity, encompassing policy development, development assessment, customer services, financial management, project management and delivery of community assets. Many staff are involved in the delivery of community infrastructure wholly or partly funded by development contributions. |
|
|
comments: |
This report focuses on key aspects of development contributions delivery progress. More technical detail on key projects and financial management can be found in the quarterly and annual financial reports and annual delivery programmes as well as project-specific reports for large items of community infrastructure. |
|
|
recommendation: |
That the information in the report be received and noted. |
Purpose of Report
The purpose of this report is to provide Council with an overview of key activities and highlights in the development contributions system over the past six months and anticipated actions and highlights for the coming twelve months.
Background
Development contributions are a whole-of-Council activity, encompassing policy development, development assessment, customer service, financial management (including works programme cash-flow) and project management and delivery of community assets.
A report is provided to Council generally on a twice yearly basis outlining progress on the delivery of key items of infrastructure through the development contributions system. This report focuses on the opening of two new parks with playgrounds in or near two local centres: St Ives and Turramurra. This report also provides an updates on a number of voluntary planning agreements and foreshadows the commencement of the much-anticipated release of the 2016 census data.
Past Contributions Update Reports have highlighted the adoption of Ku-ring-gai’s first (indirect) s94A Contributions Plan and improved web pages for contributions; Turramurra Community Hub project; Lindfield Community Hub and Village Green projects; progress on the Open Space Acquisition Strategy; new parks and civic spaces; as well as general updates on works in progress, land acquisition and community consultation.
Comments
Delivery of Two New Parks
Since the last overview through this Update Report on the Development Contributions System in November 2016, two new parks have been officially opened for use by the community.
Lapwing Reserve in St Ives
Lapwing Reserve in Carcoola Avenue, St Ives was officially opened on Tuesday, 17 January 2017 after the completion of works in December 2016. The new park is fully fenced and includes an inclusive playground which makes use of the natural topography of the site. It features embankment slides, swings, a see-saw, roundabout, toddler spinner, log steppers and a cubby playhouse. There is also an open play area and grassy hill fort at the rear of the site, a drinking fountain and shaded picnic shelter. Nature play elements such as rock scrambles and logs, and landscaping with shade trees are also provided. Further works will include the installation of a shade structure over the embankment slides and roundabout.
Lapwing Reserve adds nearly 2,000 square metres of parkland to the smaller previously existing undeveloped vacant land in Carcoola Road. The name for the park was chosen by residents after a community survey in 2015, and takes inspiration from the masked lapwing plover birds which are native to Australia and inhabit the park.
The reserve was created through the purchase - funded by Section 94 contributions – of two properties previously owned by the Office of Strategic Lands.
Lapwing Reserve St Ives – Photo from Opening Day 17 January 2017
Cameron Park, Turramurra
Cameron Park existed as a small playground but was doubled in size by the acquisition of four adjoining allotments and reconstructed as a cohesive site. After a number of challenges occasioned by the insolvency of the lead contractor, Council staff took on the direct management of the park through to completion. Cameron Park was officially opened on 9 March 2017.
The newly expanded Cameron Park features open grassy areas and plentiful shade from trees – including the retention of the significant established oaks. A multipurpose paved area with outdoor table tennis table and picnic facilities, shown in the picture below, has been constructed on the sites at 2-8 Gilroy Road which were acquired by Council to expand the park and which would, by now, have been a multi-storey development, but for Council’s acquisition.
Cameron Park also features a self-cleaning, accessible public toilet, as well as brand new seating, fencing, pathways and lighting. Cameron Park’s playground has been upgraded together with child-friendly sculpture, a bicycle path and a dry creek bed and bridge to create a vibrant area for community recreation and leisure activities. Accessibility is enhanced by allowance for accessible parking and short stay parking in the immediate vicinity.
Cameron Park Turramurra – Shelter and table tennis table
Allan Avenue Park, Turramurra (working name)
Ku-ring-gai Council’s next new park to be delivered on the corner of Allan Avenue, Duff Street and Holmes Street in Turramurra, is now at design stage. This follows on from an initial community survey and an inclusive playspace design workshop which was held to draw on experience within the community to establish practical, accessible and inclusive design outcomes for the new park. Following the preparation and reporting of a concept design, further community consultation will then take place.
Located on the western side of the Pacific Highway and Northern Railway Line (the opposite side to the newly opened Cameron Park) this new park will support communities living on the western side of Turramurra, particularly in the new developments along this side of the Pacific Highway. Demolition is currently nearly complete, allowing the site to be profiled for the detailed design.
Image from preliminary features mapping for Allan Avenue Reserve
Playgrounds
Funding for playgrounds is sourced from a variety of budgets including – but not limited to – development contributions. Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 provides for eleven playgrounds of various sizes (6 local, 4 larger local and 1 district playground) to be included in either new or existing parks to meet need arising from new development. Siting is targeted to areas where new development in occurring. There is also capacity for incoming contributions from the contributions under Ku-ring-gai s94A Contributions Plan 2015 to provide for new playgrounds under that part of the works programme targeted to upgrades to local parks located in the residential areas established from the 1960s to the 1980s which are now being renewed with major extensions and knock-down-rebuilds. These areas are generally more remote from the local centres. Council staff are currently establishing a rolling works programme of playground and park upgrades utilising all available funding for the benefit of the community.
Planning Agreements New Roads – Status Update for Gordon
Two Voluntary Planning Agreements – one executed and one draft exhibited – relate to the road link between Dumaresq Street and Moree Street in Gordon. With the effective finalisation of the construction drawings this month, discussions are underway to formalise the extent of the road to be undertaken by the developer with the executed Planning Agreement as this developer is in a position to commence work in immediate future and is now certain to be the first of the two developments to commence construction. A drainage culvert passes under the road in the vicinity of the boundary between the two road-link properties and this, being a significant piece of infrastructure, is logistically best delivered by the first development to commence construction.
The draft VPA associated with the other redevelopment site fronting Moree Street has recently completed exhibition with one submission received. However, in the interim, there has been a change to the architectural and design team for the redevelopment and further discussions are required before the matter is formally reported to Council post-exhibition.
Planning Agreements for Laneways
As part of the comprehensive strategic planning of Ku-ring-gai’s Local Centres, a programme of laneway activation is supported by the Development Control Plan. Some of the key lanes for widening and/or revitalisation with active street frontages and public domain improvements include:, Fitzsimons Lane in Gordon, Post Office Lane in Pymble, Havilah Lane in Lindfield and Forbes Lane in Turramurra.
Of these, there are currently at least six sites adjacent to laneways now at various stages of progression including one executed Planning Agreement, two in the drafting stage, one as a formal offer to enter into a Planning Agreement, and a couple at pre-DA or making preliminary inquiries.
Some other lanes, such as McIntyre Lane in Gordon and Balfour Lane in Lindfield, require relocation to unite prospective development sites and to avoid orphaned undersized sites that are incapable of redevelopment while maintaining access for adjoining properties.
Fitzsimons Lane in Gordon
Of all the laneways highlighted in Ku-ring-gai’s strategic planning for the local centres, Fitzsimons Lane in Gordon is the most advanced. Ten development applications with some frontage to Fitzsimons Lane are either completed, under construction, recently approved or under assessment. This leaves only three sites that have not been the subject of an application for redevelopment at this stage however at least two have been recently upgraded and are considered unlikely to redevelop in the short term.
Three of the redevelopment sites are subject to an intention to widen the narrowest point of Fitzsimons Lane where it approaches Merriwa Street. The first Planning Agreement was executed on 24 February 2017 and the process of subdivision and dedication has commenced. Two other draft Planning Agreements are underway.
The Fitzsimons Lane area of Gordon also bounded by Merriwa Street, Ridge Street, the Pacific Highway and Mona Vale Road, was originally envisaged to be a more mixed commercial/residential street due to an impetus to retain employment land in Ku-ring-gai however the resulting redevelopment has been chiefly residential in character with only small scale shops, cafés and professional consulting rooms at ground level.
As a result of the increasing numbers of new residents, the intended upgrade of the public domain is now becoming critical. The first redevelopment is now complete and already occupied by residents, another is at final fit-out stage and several others are well under construction, with only a few yet to commence. As such, the present redevelopment phase is expected to be complete around the end of 2018.
The present public domain, as a former commercial office precinct now dominated by the movement of construction traffic, is pedestrian unfriendly. The design process for the public domain to address the renaissance of the area post-construction has commenced with the intention that it should be scheduled as soon of the current construction phase is nearing completion. It is anticipated that a draft design will be reported to Council for exhibition and public comment later in 2017 or early 2018.
Post Office Lane in Pymble
A formal letter of offer has been received from a development in Pymble fronting the Pacific Highway and backing on to Post Office Lane which can be viewed at Attachment A1. The offer-in-principle was negotiated as part of a Land and Environment Court case with the result that the development has already received consent from the Court based on their formal letter of offer. In accordance with the terms of the offer, the onus is on the developer to provide a first draft of the Planning Agreement to Council for discussion. A copy of Council’s Planning Agreement Policy 2016 was provided as part of a reminder of those terms in February 2017. It is recommended that Council authorise staff to progress the matter in accordance with Council’s adopted policies and strategic planning documents once a draft is received, prior to formally reporting the draft to an OMC for authorisation to go to public exhibition.
Forbes Lane in Turramurra
A formal pre-DA for the first development fronting the Pacific Highway at Turramurra which also backs onto Forbes Lane has recently been scheduled. The location of this site integrates closely with the Activate Turramurra proposals. More information should be available for inclusion by the next Contributions Update Report.
Havilah Lane in Lindfield
Preliminary discussions have commenced with a prospective developer ahead of a formal pre-DA. This matter is at the earliest of preliminary stages.
McIntyre Lane in Gordon
McIntyre Lane, off McIntyre Street in Gordon divides sites which require amalgamation in order to prevent the creation of orphaned sites that are too small for individual redevelopment. Currently, however, McIntyre Lane provides direct vehicular access to another site. This site was the subject of a pre-DA in 2015 and the possibility of a draft Planning Agreement was reported to Council as part of an update on Planning Agreements to the OMC of 24 November 2015. To date, nothing further appears to have progressed towards a draft Planning Agreement or formal Development Application on that site.
Summary
Notwithstanding that the in-principle inquiries regarding the last two lanes are at a very early stage, it is indicative of the increasing pace of delivery of sites in the Ku-ring-gai LGA since the gazettal of the Local Centres LEP in 2012, that these sites, which are a little more challenging in terms of both opportunities and constraints, are now coming to the fore.
Prospective Works-in-Kind in Pymble
At the OMC of 11 November 2015, a prospective VPA for streetscape and traffic works identified in Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 was foreshadowed as part of DA0145/15 for 2-4 Everton Road and 2-8 Pymble Avenue Pymble. That development subsequently received consent from the Land and Environment Court in August of 2016 but the in-principle offer to deliver works outside the site had not proceeded further by that stage and the opportunity was lost. There will no longer be a Planning Agreement for that site since the appropriate time to formalise this process has past.
Census 2016 – Staged Data Releases
The staged release of the 2016 Census data is an important period for Council planning in general and infrastructure planning and funding in particular. The 2016 census data will benchmark population change in the Ku-ring-gai LGA over the past five years – since the gazettal of the Centres LEPs – and over the past ten years – since the gazettal of KLEP 194.
It will also be time to analyse the main s94 Contributions Plan – in terms of the assumptions behind Ku-ring-gai’s growth and to prepare for the post-census review.
Data from the Census is released in stages. The first comprehensive release of 2016 Census data will occur on Tuesday, 27 June 2017. This dataset will include national, state/territory and capital city data for selected key person, family and dwelling characteristics, including age, sex, religion, language and income. Community level Census data, including information on small population groups and for small geographic areas such as suburbs and Local Government Areas such as Ku‑ring-gai will also be available.
Rebased Estimated Resident Population and the results of a Post Enumeration Survey will also be released on 27 June 2017.
Detailed Census data on employment, qualifications and population mobility (journey to work and previous address) will be released in October 2017. Employment data is also essential to understanding the Ku-ring-gai Local Government Area and also supports the analysis and review of the Contributions Plan.
The other chief factors influencing the timing of a review
of the Contributions Plan are the outcomes arising from the Greater Sydney
Commission and, aligned to this, issues for the future provision of
infrastructure affected by the on-going status of the threshold or
‘cap’ on contributions, which remains, in 2017, at $20,000 in 2009
dollars for most of Sydney’s brownfields areas and $30,000 in 2009
dollars for many of Sydney’s greenfield areas – excepting only
those areas in each category with a full or partial exemption.
integrated planning and reporting
Theme One: Community, People and Culture
Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective |
Delivery Program Term Achievement |
Operational Plan Task |
C1.1 An equitable and inclusion community that cares and provides for its members |
Our community facilities are accessible and function as cultural hubs to attract a range of users |
C6.1.1.1.1-C6.1.1.1.3 New community facilities under design and planned delivery for Lindfield Town Centre |
C4.1 A community that embraces healthier lifestyle choices and practices |
New and enhanced open space and recreation facilities have been delivered to increase community use and enjoyment |
C4.1.2.1.1; C4.1.2.1.2; and C4.1.2.1.3 Greengate Park ready to open. Eton Road Oval and community centre opened 17 December 2013. Balcombe Park Wahroonga opened last year. Cameron Park Turramurra ready to commence construction. |
Theme Three: Places, Spaces and Infrastructure
Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective |
Delivery Program Term Achievement |
Operational Plan Task |
P1.1 Ku-ring-gai’s unique and visual character and identity is maintained |
Place making programmes are being implemented for selected council owned areas |
P1.1.1.1.2 Lindfield town centre – both east and west of the railway line/Pacific Hwy – undergoing urban renewal |
P2.1 A robust planning framework is in place to deliver quality design outcomes and maintain the identity and character of Ku-ring-gai |
Strategies, plans and processes are in place to effectively manage the impact of new development |
P8.1.1.1.1.1-2 Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 ensures new development contributes towards the cost of delivering supporting infrastructure. |
P4.1 Our centres offer a broad range of shops and services and contain lively urban village spaces where people can live, work, shop, meet and spend leisure time |
Plans to revitalise local centres are being progressively implemented and achieve quality design outcomes in collaboration with key agencies, landholders and the community |
P1.1.1.1.2 Lindfield is the first centre to undergo comprehensive Masterplanning for revitalisation. |
P6.1 Recreation, sporting and leisure facilities are available to meet the community’s diverse and changing needs |
A programme is being implemented to improve existing recreation, sporting and leisure facilities and facilitate the establishment of new facilities. |
C4.1.2.1.2-3; New facilities are being established including: Eton Road Oval, Greengate Park and Cameron Park. |
P7 Multipurpose community buildings and facilities are available to meet the community’s diverse and changing needs |
Standards are developed to improve the condition and functionality of existing and new assets |
C6.1.2.1.2 New community facilities including a new library and multi-purpose community facilities are in the Masterplanning stages for Lindfield. |
P8.1 An improved standard of infrastructure that meets the community’s service level standards and Council’s obligations as the custodian of our community’s assets |
Our public infrastructure and assets are planned, managed and funded to meet community expectations, defined levels of service and address inter-generational equity |
C6.1.2.1.2; C4.1.2.1.3 New public infrastructure is planned to support new development and ensure that everyone who lives and works in Ku-ring-gai continues to enjoy access to public facilities. |
Theme Four: Access, Traffic and Transport
Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective |
Delivery Program Term Achievement |
Operational Plan Task |
T1.1 A range of integrated transport choices are available to enable effective movement to, from and around Ku-ring-gai |
A network of safe and convenient links to local centres, major land uses and recreational opportunities is in place |
C6.1.2.1.1; T1.1.3.1.1 Lindfield Commuter car park, park, community facilities and realigned Drovers Way. |
T3.1 An accessible public transport and regional road network that meets the diverse and changing needs of the community |
A strategic access, traffic and transport plan is being implemented for the Northern Sydney Region |
C6.1.2.1.1; T 1.1.3.1.1 Commuter car parking and new link roads |
Theme Six: Leadership and Governance
Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective |
Delivery Program Term Achievement |
Operational Plan Task |
L1.1 A shared long term vision for Ku-ring-gai underpins strategic collaboration, policy development and community engagement |
Council’s responses to government policy and reforms are guided by and aligned with the adopted Community Strategic Plan 2030 “Our Community – Our Future” |
L1.1.2.1.1 and L1.1.2.1.2 Ku-ring-gai made a comprehensive submission to the White Paper and Planning Bill and continues to have input into on-going planning for the future Planning System in respect of the future contributions system with the Department of Planning and Infrastructure |
L2.1 Council rigorously manages its financial resources and assets to maximise delivery of services |
Council expenditure satisfies the needs of the community and Council has increased its commitment to infrastructure asset management priorities |
C6.1.1.1.2 Council is leveraging the value of its assets to combine with contributions to deliver major community assets in Lindfield |
Governance Matters
Regular reporting
The need to give members of Council and the community more information on the progress and activity in the development contributions systems was identified as part of the Delivery Program and the Operational Plans. This update report has been provided regularly (twice-yearly) since 2011/12.
Risk Management
A rolling works programme
The works programme arising out of Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 through to at least 2031 is a multi-million dollar undertaking. Infrastructure delivery will be possible only through the receipt of contributions which will be affected by several economic cycles over the life of the contributions plan. The risks in taking such a strategic horizon are managed through regular reviews of the contributions plan, generally after the release of data from each five-yearly census or, potentially, more frequently, if the pace or scale of development is definitely changed by any statutory process or economic cycle. The rate and scale of development is monitored by Council staff. Sydney Water figures for delivered dwelling yield are also referenced.
Proposed reforms to the Planning Legislation that governs development contributions
It is now accepted that the Planning Reforms which were intended to replace the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act with a new piece of legislation have stagnated since they failed to gain Senate support at the end of 2013 and are no longer likely to be finalised as originally envisaged.
There are alternative mechanisms available to the NSW Government for the introduction of some of the reforms affecting development contributions, for example via Ministerial Direction under s94E or via amendments to the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation.
Presently the NSW Government is actively engaged in reviewing the governance of many aspects of residential development. There is also a sub-regional planning process currently being undertaken by the NSW State Government under the Greater Sydney Commission. Ku-ring-gai is in the North District.
Financial Considerations
Council maintains a dynamic Long Term Financial Plan (LTFP). The works program of Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 was integrated into the LTFP from the start of 2011 and adopted by Council on 3 May 2011. Since that date, it has been updated annually and duly reported to Council to ensure its currency. Staff from both the Finance Unit and the Urban Planning & Heritage Unit monitor both income and development growth respectively and liaise to maintain a deliverable works programme. The scheduling of works through to the long term should be considered somewhat fluid depending on strategic opportunities that might arise from time-to-time and the management of cash flows during the economic cycle.
In this context, the Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 comprises a large range of works from small-scale parkland embellishments to major community infrastructure which facilitates considerable flexibility in managing a financially deliverable work programme over time, while retaining adequate balances to support the contributions component of the complex delivery of major integrated community facilities and public domain works in Lindfield and Turramurra in the form of the Lindfield Village Green, the Lindfield Community Hub and the Turramurra Community Hub.
Contributions are also being received under Ku-ring-gai s94A Contributions Plan 2015. The receipting for these contributions is also fully integrated into the mainframe Property and Rating system and the financial management systems. After a year of operation, a review and benchmarking is expected to be undertaken shortly. The first works to be funded by this Contributions Plan are being incorporated into the Long Term Financial Plan now that there is some indication of cash-flow.
Ku-ring-gai Council’s Finance staff continue to refine the cash-flow management of development contributions to support and facilitate the infrastructure delivery programmes over the life of both contributions plans.
Social Considerations
The Ku-ring-gai Local Government Area has been going through a period of change commencing in 2004. This is bringing about population growth and demographic change following years of declining and stable population since the 1980s. Infrastructure is essential to support and encourage the integration of the new residents in Ku-ring-gai, both among residents of the new dwellings being built and those moving into larger existing housing vacated by the members of Ku‑ring-gai’s older population who have ‘downsized’ into smaller local accommodation.
The provision of additional community infrastructure providing both outdoor and indoor community spaces will continue to support this process and help Ku-ring-gai continue to be a vibrant and popular place to live for all ages.
Ku-ring-gai Council continues to prioritise the delivery of community infrastructure in areas of high development activity and in accessible locations for the majority of residents as well as local businesses and their employees.
The 2016 census was held on Tuesday, 9 August 2016. There has been significant change in Ku-ring-gai since the 2011 census with the construction of many more medium-to-high density units and it will be very interesting to see the changes in the Ku-ring-gai population as a whole as a result of the delivery of newer housing types as data begins to be released. Census data release is now imminent – with the first main release commencing from Tuesday 27 June 2017.
Environmental Considerations
Environmental considerations are part of the detailed design of every item of infrastructure provided for in the Contributions Plan. The provision of this infrastructure is required to support cohesive and sustainable communities in areas of increasing urbanisation.
Community Consultation
Extensive community consultation is part of the delivery aspect of all key items of infrastructure including new parks and community facilities. Early in 2016, Ku-ring-gai revamped the webpages that relate to the development contributions system including highlighting the rolling infrastructure delivery programme. Major items of infrastructure are highlighted with links to the specific progress pages presented online for community information.
Internal Consultation
The management of the development contributions system is a truly whole-of-Council system from policy development, to contributions calculation, through inflation and receipting to infrastructure development. All aspects of the contributions system are co-ordinated across Council with input from all areas with a direct interest in that aspect on an on-going basis.
Summary
This report summarises Ku-ring-gai’s achievements in infrastructure delivery and well as highlighting where Ku-ring-gai is heading in the delivery of infrastructure funded, or partly funded, by development contributions across the LGA with particular reference to the local centres where the majority of redevelopment is concentrated.
It should be remembered that this is a summary outline report. Much more extensive technical and financial detail is reported quarterly as part of Council’s Long Term Financial Plan, in Council’s annual budget and delivery programmes and, in the case of major items of infrastructure, such as Lindfield Community Hub, Lindfield Village Green and the Turramurra Community Hub Project and major new parks, these are also subject to separate, more detailed, project reporting on a regular basis.
A. That the update report on the development contributions system in Ku-ring-gai be received and noted.
B. That the formal offer to enter into a VPA from the development backing on to Post Office Lane in Pymble be noted and delegation be granted to the General Manager or his nominee to progress the matter in line with Council’s adopted Strategic Planning documents until it is ready for reporting for exhibition.
C. That Council endorses staff undertaking an active role to facilitate the dedication of land for road widening along laneways identified in Council’s adopted Strategic Planning documents including Ku-ring-gai Development Control Plan, Ku-ring-gai Public Domain Plan 2010 and/or Ku-ring-gai- Contributions Plan 2010 ahead of formal notification of an offer to enter into a Voluntary Planning Agreement.
|
Kate Paterson Infrastructure Co-ordinator |
Antony Fabbro Manager Urban & Heritage Planning |
Andrew Watson Director Strategy & Environment |
|
A1 |
Draft Offer to enter into a VPA |
|
2017/126942 |
Ordinary Meeting of Council - 23 May 2017 |
GB.9 / 459 |
|
|
Item GB.9 |
S09069/7 |
|
5 May 2017 |
Cities Power Partnership
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
purpose of report: |
To seek endorsement for Council to join the Cities Power Partnership, soon to be launched by the Climate Council. |
|
|
background: |
Council’s Climate Change Policy 2015 and Greenhouse Gas Reduction Action Plan provides a management framework for Council to respond to the observed and projected implications of climate change on Ku-ring-gai’s natural and built environment, community and economy.
An opportunity exists for Council to join the Cities Power Partnership (CPP) program, soon to be launched by the Climate Council, to support the implementation of this Policy and Action Plan and to extend Council’s efforts in mitigating and adapting to climate change. |
|
|
comments: |
The CPP program aims to engage towns and cities throughout Australia, via local councils, and incentivise councils to increase renewable energy and energy efficiency, improve transport and engage in advocacy. Members of the partnership will be: · given access to a national knowledge hub; · buddied with cities to knowledge share; · visited by domestic and international experts; · connected with community energy groups; and · celebrated at events with other local leaders. The CPP program will also showcase the achievements of councils in national, local and social media and share their success with the Climate Council community of over 200,000 members and supporters. Exclusive access to small grants and renewable energy incentives will be available to the first 15-20 councils who pledge to join the CPP. |
|
|
recommendation: |
That endorsement is provided for Council to join the Cities Power Partnership, soon to be launched by the Climate Council. |
Purpose of Report
To seek endorsement for Council to join the Cities Power Partnership, soon to be launched by the Climate Council.
Background
Ku-ring-gai Council, as a key asset owner, service provider and decision-maker, has a responsibility to its community to effectively mitigate against and adapt to the impacts of climate change.
Council’s Climate Change Policy 2015 provides a management framework for Council to respond to the observed and projected implications of climate change on Ku-ring-gai’s natural and built environment, community and economy. Council’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Action Plan 2015 supports the Climate Change Policy 2015 by providing a mitigation response to climate change and describing how Council intends to meet its 2020 greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction target.
An opportunity exists for Council to join the Cities Power Partnership (CPP) program, soon to be launched by the Climate Council, to support the implementation of this Policy and Action Plan and to extend Council’s efforts in mitigating and adapting to climate change.
Comments
The CPP program aims to engage towns and cities throughout Australia, via local councils, and incentivise councils to increase renewable energy and energy efficiency, improve transport and engage in advocacy. Members of the partnership will be given:
· access to a national knowledge hub;
· buddied with cities to knowledge share;
· visited by domestic and international experts;
· connected with community energy groups; and
· celebrated at events with other local leaders.
The CPP program will also showcase the achievements of councils in national, local and social media and share their success with the Climate Council community of over 200,000 members and supporters.
Benefits of Ku-ring-gai Council joining the CPP program are:
· access to a wealth of leading experts in climate impacts and renewable energy solutions whose technical knowledge will be key to helping local councils to implement emissions reduction measures;
· the use of the Climate Council’s national status and the credibility of its Climate Councillors to connect councils across the country with community energy groups and local organisations who can help councils to implement energy efficiency and renewable energy measures quickly and effectively, as well as getting sponsors on board who can provide incentives for councils to act; and
· potentially exclusive access to small grants and renewable energy incentives (for the first 15-20 councils who pledge to join the CPP).
The CPP will launch in mid-2017, along with a Climate Council cities report authored by some of Australia’s leading experts, a brand new CPP website and a media campaign featuring councils who have joined the partnership. The first year of the program will run from mid-2017 to mid-2018.
The three phases of the Cities Power Partnership are as follows:
Figure 1: Three phases of the Cities Power Partnership
Further details of the Cities Power Partnership, including the range of actions within the partnership pledge, are included in Attachment A1. Many of the partnership pledge actions Ku‑ring-gai Council is already implementing.
integrated planning and reporting
Natural Environment
Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective |
Delivery Program Term Achievement |
Operational Plan Task |
A community addressing and responding to the impacts of climate change and extreme weather events.
|
The community is effectively informed and engaged on climate change issues.
Council’s vulnerability to climate change is reduced.
|
Deliver the Climate Wise Communities program.
Pursue viable opportunities for a community volunteer network to respond to extreme weather events. |
Governance Matters
Under the NSW Local Government Act 1993, councils are required to manage the local environment with consideration to the principles of Ecologically Sustainable Development (ESD), which incorporates the Precautionary Principle. Section 7e of the Act requires “councils, Councillors and council employees to have regard to ESD principles in carrying out all of their responsibilities”. Due to the levels of variability associated with the rate and magnitude of changes to the climatic system and its associated impacts under different modelling scenarios, Council has adopted the Precautionary Principle in responding to climate change.
Risk Management
Risks arising from climate change that have been identified by the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) with high probability, severe consequences and with sufficient data to validate a high degree of confidence, and that have relevance to Ku-ring-gai, include:
· systematic risks from extreme weather events leading to a breakdown in infrastructure networks, critical services including power, water and health support;
· risk of mortality and morbidity during periods of extreme heat, particularly for vulnerable populations and those working outdoors;
· risk to food security and breakdown of food systems due to drought, fluctuations and changes in magnitude of climate and precipitation variability;
· risk of loss of terrestrial biodiversity, ecosystem goods and service functions;
· risk of infrastructure overload arising from energy demand for heating and cooling;
· challenges to the insurance system;
· risks from reduced labour productivity; and
· risk of increase in food and water borne disease (IPCC 2014a).
“The overall risks of climate change impacts can be reduced by limiting the rate and magnitude of climate change. This will require substantial and sustained reductions in greenhouse gas emissions together with adaptation. Reducing climate change can also reduce the scale of adaptation that might be required” (IPCC 2014a).
The inadequate resilience of communities has been witnessed across Australia with recent extreme weather events. (Climate Commission 2013) This clearly demonstrates the need for councils to provide leadership in climate change adaptation by building climate resilience into its operations and service delivery and that of their constituent communities.
The Attorney-General in Carroll and O’dea (2011) discussed the legal risks associated with climate change as involving responsibility to mitigate impacts, the need to take climate change into account when making decisions and the impact of climate change on national security.
Financial Considerations
There is no direct investment required to join the CPP partnership. Staff resources within the Environment and Sustainability section of Council will be dedicated to this program. A small amount of grant funding is available to the first 15-20 councils that join the CPP partnership.
Social Considerations
Impacts from recent climate-related extremes, such as heat waves, droughts, floods, cyclones, and wildfires, reveal significant vulnerability and exposure of human systems to current climate variability (very high confidence). Impacts of such climate-related extremes on human systems include disruption of food production and water supply, damage to infrastructure and settlements, morbidity and mortality, and consequences for mental health and human well-being. (IPCC 2014a)
Environmental Considerations
Evidence of observed climate-change impacts is strongest and most comprehensive for natural systems. In many regions, changing precipitation or melting snow and ice are altering hydrological systems, affecting water resources in terms of quantity and quality (medium confidence). Many terrestrial, freshwater, and marine species have shifted their geographic ranges, seasonal activities, migration patterns, abundances, and species interactions in response to ongoing climate change (high confidence). Some impacts of ocean acidification on marine organisms have been attributed to human influence (medium confidence).” (IPCC 2014b, p6)
Community Consultation
The importance of addressing climate change is demonstrated in the long-term objectives of Council’s Our Community Our Future - Community Strategic Plan 2030:
· an aware community able to prepare and respond to the risk to life and property from emergency events;
· a community empowered with knowledge, learning and information that benefits the environment;
· a community addressing and responding to the impacts of climate change and extreme weather events; and
· a community progressively reducing its consumption of resources and leading in recycling and reuse
Internal Consultation
Staff from all directorates of Council and Councillors were consulted on Council’s Climate Change Policy 2015 and Greenhouse Gas Reduction Action Plan 2015. The CPP program supports the implementation of this Policy and Action Plan.
Summary
Council’s Climate Change Policy 2015 and Greenhouse Gas Reduction Action Plan provides a management framework for Council to respond to the observed and projected implications of climate change on Ku-ring-gai’s natural and built environment, community and economy. An opportunity exists for Council to join the Cities Power Partnership (CPP) program, soon to be launched by the Climate Council, to support the implementation of this Policy and Action Plan and to extend Council’s efforts in mitigating and adapting to climate change.
The CPP program aims to engage towns and cities, via local councils, throughout Australia and incentivise councils to increase renewable energy and energy efficiency, improve transport and engage in advocacy. Members of the partnership will be given:
· access to a national knowledge hub;
· buddied with cities to knowledge share;
· visited by domestic and international experts;
· connected with community energy groups; and
· celebrated at events with other local leaders.
The CPP program will also showcase the achievements of councils in national, local and social media and share their success with the Climate Council community of over 200,000 members and supporters. Exclusive access to small grants and renewable energy incentives will be available to the first 15-20 councils who pledge to join the CPP.
Participating councils who join the partnership will have 6 months to select 5 key actions to implement from the partnership pledge, ranging from renewable energy, energy efficiency, transport and advocacy. Many of the partnership pledge actions Ku-ring-gai Council is already implementing.
The CPP will launch in mid-2017, along with a Climate Council cities report authored by some of Australia’s leading experts, a brand new CPP website and a media campaign featuring councils who have joined the partnership. The first year of the program will run from mid-2017 to mid-2018.
It is recommended that endorsement is provided for Council to join the Cities Power Partnership, soon to be launched by the Climate Council.
REFERENCES
Carroll and O’dea Lawyers (2011) The Attorney General Speaks Out About Natural Disasters and Climate Change, School of Law, James Cook University, Thursday, 6 October 2011
Climate Commission (2013) The Angry Summer, Cool Australia.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2014a) Climate Change 2014 Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability: Summary for Policy Makers, Working Group II contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2014b) Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report: Summary for Policy Makers, Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
A. That endorsement is provided for Council to join the Cities Power Partnership, soon to be launched by the Climate Council.
B. That a letter is prepared by the Mayor, on behalf of Council, to advise the Climate Council of Ku-ring-gai Council’s commitment to join the Cities Power Partnership Program. |
Marnie Kikken Manager Environment & Sustainability |
Andrew Watson Director Strategy & Environment |
A1 |
Cities Power Partnership information for councils |
|
2017/120478 |
Ordinary Meeting of Council - 23 May 2017 |
GB.10 / 484 |
|
|
Item GB.10 |
S11318 |
|
20 April 2017 |
Ku-ring-gai Fitness and Aquatic Centre Solar Power Tender - RFT 03-2017
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
purpose of report: |
To consider the tenders received for the installation of a Solar power system at the Ku-ring-gai Fitness and Aquatic Centre (KFAC) and appoint the preferred tenderer. |
|
|
background: |
As part of Council’s Environmental Levy energy reduction program, it was identified that the roof area at the KFAC site would be suitable for the installation of Solar PV panels. Council undertook a detailed design for the viability of solar power in 2015. The expected annual energy generation from the 100kW solar power system is 117 MWh per annum, which is equivalent to approximately 7% of the KFAC’s existing consumption. Tender documents were prepared for supply and installation of the design. The tender documents were released through Tenderlink on 6 February 2017 and submissions for the tender closed on 6 March 2017. |
|
|
comments: |
In total two (2) submissions were received. The submissions were assessed using published criteria which identified the best value to Council. |
|
|
recommendation: |
In accordance with Section 55 of the Local Government Act and Tender Regulations, it is recommended Council accept the tender submitted by tenderer ‘A’ as identified in the Confidential Weighted Scoring Summary (Attachment 1). |
Purpose of Report
To consider the tenders received for the installation of a Solar power system at the Ku-ring-gai Fitness and Aquatic Centre (KFAC) and appoint the preferred tenderer.
Background
As part of Council’s Environmental Levy energy reduction program, it was identified that the roof space at the KFAC site would be suitable for the installation of Solar PV panels.
Council undertook a detailed assessment and shading analysis of the benefits of either a solar water heating system to boost the pool heating systems or a solar power system to reduce the energy supplied from the grid. This assessment concluded that the Solar PV system would provide the best outcome.
The expected annual energy generation from the 100kW solar power system is 117 MWh per annum, which is equivalent to approximately 7% of the KFAC’s existing consumption.
As the cost of the works had the potential to exceed $150,000, tenders were called using Tenderlink, in accordance with the tender requirements of the Local Government Act and Regulation.
Tender documents were prepared for supply and installation of the design. The tender documents were released through Tenderlink on 6 February 2017 and submissions for the tender closed on 6 March 2017.
Comments
Two (2) tenders were received and recorded in accordance with Council’s tendering policy. Tenders were received from the following companies:
• Todae Solar;
• Solgen.
It should be noted the order above does not correspond to the order of the list of tenderers named from ‘A’ and ‘B’ in the list of tenders received.
A Tender Evaluation Panel consisting of staff from the Operations and Strategy & Environment Departments was formed to assess the two (2) tenders received. The evaluation took into account:
· conformity of submission;
· lump sum fee;
· company and staff experience;
· resources and availability;
· project history with Council;
· methodology;
· risk management and environmental management; and
· the company’s financial capacity.
Confidential attachments to this report include:
· Tender Evaluation Panel’s weighted scoring summary of submissions and recommendation (Confidential Attachment A1).
· Full version of Tender Evaluation Panel’s weighted scoring of submissions and recommendation, including pricing (Confidential Attachment A2).
· List of tenderers (Confidential Attachment 3).
From the two (2) submissions received and the available information taken into account during the evaluation and scoring of each element of the assessment, Tenderer ‘A’ was identified as providing the best value to Council.
An independent Performance and Financial Assessment by Corporate Scorecard Pty Ltd was considered by Council’s procurement management but was deemed not necessary due to the project quote being below $100,000.
integrated planning and reporting
Theme 3 Places, Spaces and Infrastructure
P7 Enhancing community buildings and facilities
Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective |
Delivery Program Term Achievement |
Operational Plan Task |
N5.1 A community progressively reducing its consumption of resources and leading in recycling and reuse. |
P7.1.1 Standards are developed to improve the condition and functionality of existing and new assets. |
P7.1.1.3.1 Implement prioritised energy and water conservation and efficiency works program. |
Governance Matters
The tender documents were released through Tenderlink on 6 February 2017 and submissions for the tender closed on 6 March 2017. At the close of tender, two (2) tenders were received. All submissions were recorded in accordance with Council’s tendering policy.
Confidential attachments to this report include the Tender Evaluation Panel’s comments and recommendation.
The attachments are considered to be confidential in accordance with Section 10A (2)(d)(iii) of The Local Government Act 1993 as they are considered to contain commercial in confidence information.
Risk Management
Three (3) key areas of risk were identified in relation to the proposed work:
· That work needed to be carried out by a suitably qualified company with experience in projects of similar scale;
· Company’s availability – the company was available to commence work as detailed in their submission;
· That Council should not be exposed to financial risk. An independent Performance and Financial Assessment by Corporate Scorecard Pty Ltd was considered by Council’s procurement management but was deemed not necessary due to the project quote being below $100,000.
Following evaluation the tenderer assessed as providing the most project specific expertise to under the works for Council was Tenderer ‘A’.
Financial Considerations
The project is to be funded by the Environmental Levy in line with the Council’s Delivery Program and Operational Plan (2016/2017).
The design work has estimated the Solar PV system to have a simple payback of 7 years, equating to a return on investment that meets Council’s cost of emissions abatement criteria for energy efficiency projects of this nature.
Annual energy savings costs are estimated to be $13,622 per annum.
Social Considerations
The installation of a Solar Power system at the site will provide emissions free power and reduce the amount of electricity supplied via the grid to the KFAC site. The resultant reduction in running costs will assist with the ongoing viability of providing this aquatic and fitness service to the community.
Environmental Considerations
The expected annual energy generation from the 100kW solar power system is 117 MWh per annum, which is equivalent to approximately 7% of the KFAC’s existing consumption, leading to a reduction of Council greenhouse gas emissions of approximately 124 tonnes of CO2 each year.
Community Consultation
The objectives of the project meet the objectives of Council’s Delivery Program and Operational Plan and Environmental Levy program. Hence, in this case community consultation for the project is not required.
Internal Consultation
Consultation was undertaken by officers from the Strategy & Environment Department for the proposed works with staff from the Operations and Community departments.
Summary
As part of Council’s Environmental Levy energy reduction program, it was identified that the energy consumption of the Ku-ring-gai Fitness and Aquatic Centre would be improved by the installation of a 100kW Solar Power system at the Ku-ring-gai Fitness and Aquatic Centre.
Council undertook a detailed assessment and shading analysis of the benefits of either a solar water heating system to boost the pool heating systems or a solar power system to reduce the energy supplied from the grid. This assessment concluded that the Solar PV system would provide the best outcome.
The expected annual energy generation from the 100kW solar power system is 117 MWh per annum, which is equivalent to approximately 7% of the KFAC’s existing consumption, leading to a reduction of Council greenhouse gas emissions of approximately 124 tonnes of CO2 each year.
Tender documents were prepared for supply and installation of the design. The tender documents were released through Tenderlink on 6 February 2017 and submissions for the tender closed on 6 March 2017.
From the two (2) submissions received and the available information taken into account during the evaluation and scoring of each element of the assessment, Tenderer ‘A’ was identified as providing the best value to Council.
Following the evaluation it is recommended Tenderer ‘A’ be appointed on the basis of providing the best value to Council.
A. That Council accept the tender submission from Tenderer ‘A’ for the installation of a 100kW Solar Power system at the Ku-ring-gai Fitness and Aquatic Centre.
B. That the Mayor and General Manager be delegated authority to execute all tender documentation on Council’s behalf in relation to the contract.
C. That the Seal of Council be affixed to the contract documents.
D. That all tenderers be advised of Council’s decision in accordance with Clause 178 of the Local Government Tendering Regulations.
|
Wayne Allwood Building Sustainability Project Officer |
Peter Vun Sustainability Planner |
Andrew Watson Director Strategy & Environment |
|
RFT 03-2017 Weighted scoring summary |
|
Confidential |
||
|
Signed evaluation form-KFAC Solar |
|
Confidential |
|
|
RFT 03-2017 List of Tenderers for KFAC Solar PV |
|
Confidential |
Ordinary Meeting of Council - 23 May 2017 |
GB.11 / 489 |
|
|
Item GB.11 |
TM3/09 |
|
8 May 2017 |
Roads & Maritime Funded Project Proposed additional car parking Old School Car Park, St Ives
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
purpose of report: |
To seek Council’s acceptance to the Roads & Maritime Services (RMS) grant for the reconfiguration and resurfacing of the Old School Car Park at St Ives. |
|
|
background: |
Council considered a report on the Clearway Program in St Ives at its meeting on 6 December 2016 and resolved to contact the RMS about the reconfiguration of the Old School car park at St Ives to provide for increased parking spaces and report the outcome back to Council. |
|
|
comments: |
A revised plan for the Old School car park has been prepared and submitted to the RMS with an estimate of cost for the upgrading of the car park to provide for additional parking spaces. The RMS has advised Council of the grant for the work but the work needs to be completed before 30 June 2017. |
|
|
recommendation: |
That Council advise the RMS of its acceptance of the grant for the resurfacing and reconfiguration of the Old School car park and arrange for the work to be completed by 30 June 2017. |
Purpose of Report
To seek Council’s acceptance to the Roads & Maritime Services (RMS) grant for the reconfiguration and resurfacing of the Old School Car Park at St Ives.
Background
Council considered a report on the proposed clearway to be implemented by the Roads and Maritime Services (RMS) at its meeting on 6th December 2016 and resolved as follows:
A. That Council accept the offer of funding from the RMS for additional parking in the car park opposite the entrance to Stanley Street, St Ives at 208-210 Mona Vale Road St Ives.
B. That Council advises the RMS of its acceptance to the proposed time parking changes in the adjoining car park and surrounding roads.
C. That the RMS be formally contacted to review the Old School site carpark for reconfiguration for increased car parking spaces, and the outcome reported back to Council, and that Council seek the RMS to fund the outcome.
Work on the car park opposite Stanley Street and changes to the parking restrictions in the adjoining carpark were completed in March 2017 and the clearway along Mona Vale Road is now in operation.
Comments
Council’s Traffic staff have prepared a plan for the revised parking layouts in the Old School Carpark at St Ives and attached is a copy of the revised plan. This allows for an additional six (6) parking spaces for public use.
The plan has been submitted to the RMS and attached is a copy of the letter from the RMS advising of the grant funding for the work.
The RMS have requested Council accept the grant and complete the works before the end of June 2017.
If Council were to accept the grant, contractors will be arranged to undertake the work in June 2017.
Further refinements to the plan have been made since the plan was submitted to the RMS to cater for pedestrian movements and accessibility requirements. The user group parking allocation has been relocated to the unused area next to the Old School building to minimise traffic movements between the Old School building and the Trattoria restaurant.
integrated planning and reporting
Access, Traffic and Transport
Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective |
Delivery Program Term Achievement |
Operational Plan Task |
Council engages with the State Government to upgrade regional roads and reduce congestion in the local road network. |
A program of prioritised works has been developed and is being implemented in partnership with State Government to improve the efficiency of major roads. |
Pursue funding opportunities with Roads and Maritime Services (RMS) for improvement works on regional roads and at blackspot locations. |
Governance Matters
The RMS has provided Council with funding for the upgrade of the Old School carpark to allow for additional parking spaces and as such, Council is required by resolution to accept the grant.
Risk Management
The work is to be completed by 30 June 2017. There is a risk that the works may not be completed by the due date as it will be dependent on contractor availability. Staff from Operations has contacted several contractors to check on the availability to undertake the work before the end of June 2017. At this stage, it appears contractors are available subject to wet weather delays.
Financial Considerations
The works are to be fully funded by the RMS. The estimate has included contingencies to cover any unforeseen events.
Social Considerations
The additional spaces in the Old School carpark will provide for much needed additional parking spaces in St Ives. In particular, it will assist the patronage of the shops along Mona Vale Road between Rosedale Road and Memorial Avenue.
Environmental Considerations
An environmental assessment will be undertaken prior to carrying out the work but only minor vegetation is proposed to be removed associated with the work.
Community Consultation
Consultation will be undertaken with the user groups and lessees prior to undertaking the work. Notices will be in place to advise when the work is to be undertaken.
Internal Consultation
Staff from Council’s Corporate Section have been advised of the grant application.
Summary
Council considered a report on the Clearway in St Ives at its meeting on 6 December 2016 and resolved to contact the RMS about the reconfiguration of the Old School car park at St Ives to provide for increased parking spaces and report the outcome back to Council.
A revised plan for the Old School car park has been prepared and submitted to the RMS with an estimate of cost for the upgrading of the car park to provide for additional parking spaces.
The RMS have advised Council of the grant for the work but the work needs to be completed before 30 June 2017.
That Council advise the RMS of its acceptance of the grant for the resurfacing and reconfiguration of the Old School car park and arrange for work to be completed by 30 June 2017.
|
Greg Piconi Director Operations |
|
A1 |
Old School carpark - proposed parking layout |
|
2017/125204 |
|
|
A2 |
RMS - approved project - clearways program |
|
2017/125336 |
Ordinary Meeting of Council - 23 May 2017 |
GB.12 / 502 |
|
|
Item GB.12 |
S03211 |
|
1 May 2017 |
Road Naming - Roxy Place
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
purpose of report: |
To report on the proposal to name a new road in Lindfield, “Roxy Place”. |
|
|
background: |
A request was received from the developers to name the road in the new subdivision off Eton Road, Lindfield. |
|
|
comments: |
The road name suggested by the applicant of the subdivision is “Roxy Place”. |
|
|
recommendation: |
That the Council adopt the name for the new road as ”Roxy Place” and notices be published in a local newspaper and the NSW Government Gazette. |
Purpose of Report
To report on the proposal to name a new road in Lindfield, “Roxy Place”.
Background
A new road is to be constructed to service the new residential development subdivision at No 101 Eton Road, Lindfield.
The site was occupied by Screen Australia. Through amalgamations and changes in priorities, Screen Australia no longer required the site and was sold for development. A name has been proposed for the new road by the developer of the site.
The road is being named after The Roxy Theatre that was constructed on the site in the 1970’s. It was a purpose built theatre for use by Screen Australia. It was also available for hire and was quoted as Australia’s finest private preview theatre.
Comments
A copy of the road plan with the proposed road name is attached to this report. [Attachment A1]
Under Section 162 of the Roads Act 1993, Council is the Road Naming Authority. If Council resolves to adopt the name suggested, “Roxy Place”, Section 162 of the Roads Act 1993, requires publication of the new name in a local newspaper and in the NSW Government Gazette.
The proposed road name does not conflict with any other existing road names in the Ku-ring-gai area and conforms to the Geographical Names Board of New South Wales, NSW Addressing User Manual. It is therefore considered appropriate to name the new road “Roxy Place”.
integrated planning and reporting
Places, Spaces and Infrastructure
Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective |
Delivery Program Term Achievement |
Operational Plan Task |
P8.1.2 Programs for infrastructure are delivered. |
Asset management plans are in place
|
Implementation of assets
|
Governance Matters
The actions outlined within this report comply with:
· Roads Act 1993, Section 162
· Roads (General) Regulation 2008
· NSW Addressing User Manual – Geographical Names Board of NSW
Risk Management
Compliance with the above Acts, regulations, policies and procedures minimises any risks associated with this proposal.
Financial Considerations
The provision of a street sign is included in the works within the subdivision. The developer will be required to fund the installation of the new street sign.
Social Considerations
The chosen name is in accordance with Geographical Names Board of New South Wales, NSW Addressing User Manual.
Environmental Considerations
Nil
Community Consultation
Council has consulted with the Geographical Names Board of New South Wales, and has advertised the proposed road name in a local newspaper.
No objections have been received to the naming of “Roxy Place” following the advertising.
Following Council resolution, the adopted road name will be advertised in a local newspaper and the NSW Government Gazette.
Internal Consultation
Council’s Corporate Department has been consulted in this process and will be advised of the new details following approval by Council, and notice published in a local newspaper and in the NSW Government Gazette.
Summary
Council has been asked to approve the road name “Roxy Place”.
No objections were received from the Geographical Names Board of New South Wales, and the public following the statutory consultation period.
A. That Council names the new road off Eton Road into the new Lindfield subdivision as “Roxy Place”.
B. That a notice of the new road name be published in a local newspaper and the NSW Government Gazette.
|
Greg Piconi Director Operations |
|
A1 |
Proposed Road Name Plan |
|
2017/005108 |
Ordinary Meeting of Council - 23 May 2017 |
NM.1 / 506 |
|
|
Item NM.1 |
DA0346/16 |
|
9 May 2017 |
Notice of Motion
DA0346/16 Childcare Centre 24 Bayswater Road Lindfield
Current Land and Environment Court proceedings case number 2016/00309535 between Omid Mohebati-Arani as applicant and Ku-ring-gai Council as respondent.
The universal community opposition to the child-care centre application at 24 Bayswater Road resulted in 212 community objections to the original DA and 134 to the amended DA. Also, the 100 members of the Loyal Henry Community Association Inc, and over 250 local residents on the association’s mailing list, reject this development as inappropriately located and in breach of council controls.
The initial document (called a SOFAC) filed by the Council in the Land and Environment Court, detailed 9 contentions that the DA should be refused. An important contention was that the development is "contrary to the public interest” based on 7 issues from the community submissions.
Although there were the same and additional objections to the amended DA, the council has excluded public interest from its amended SOFAC. Because this document sets the agenda for the court case, issues not raised in it may not be considered.
Having taking regard to the following matters,
a) the wide community interest in this application, as evidenced by the number of opposing community submissions received by the Council in response to the original application and the amended application,
b) a public interest contention reflecting these community submissions having been included in the original court documents (SOFAC) filed by the Council in response to the original application,
c) the absence of a public interest contention in the amended SOFAC filed by the Council in response to the amended application,
d) such absence not being accounted for or explained to the community, despite their repeated requests for a meeting or explanation and
e) a public interest contention invariably being included in Council SOFAC’s prepared in similar circumstances to this one.
I move:
That council officers be directed to instruct the external solicitors, engaged by Council in these proceedings, to further amend the court document (SOFAC) filed by Council to include a public interest contention, reflecting and particularising the community submissions received by the Council.
That the above Notice of Motion as printed, be adopted.
|
Councillor David Citer Councillor for Gordon Ward |
|
Ordinary Meeting of Council - 23 May 2017 |
NM.2 / 507 |
|
|
Item NM.2 |
S11182 |
|
15 May 2017 |
Notice of Motion
Council Website Home Page Link Public Exhibition
Notice of Motion from Councillor Berlioz dated 15 May 2017
Last week an Exhibition tab with direct link to proposals and documents on Public Exhibition was displayed on Council’s home webpage.
This ensures that matters on exhibition are clearly visible to users and not embedded in the website.
To ensure this becomes council policy or practice, I move that:
A specific Exhibition tab with a direct link to all proposals and documents on Public Exhibition must be visible on Council’s home page Navigation Menu, and that the Media and Communications Policy be amended to incorporate this.
That the above Notice of Motion as printed be adopted.
|
Councillor Christiane Berlioz Councillor for St Ives Ward |
|